key: cord-0827199-l6hgbrs1
authors: Séguigne, Clémentine; Mourier, Johann; Vignaud, Thomas; Buray, Nicolas; Clua, Éric
title: Effects of a COVID‐19 lockdown‐induced pause and resumption of artificial provisioning on blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai) in French Polynesia (East‐Pacific)
date: 2021-10-30
journal: Ethology
DOI: 10.1111/eth.13246
sha: 078b2093ce803925c44cd6ebc28597524863a2a6
doc_id: 827199
cord_uid: l6hgbrs1

The tourism activities linked to artificial provisioning of blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai) on a specific site in French Polynesia were suddenly and completely stopped due to a COVID‐19 lockdown that lasted 6 weeks from March 20 until April 30, 2020. Using both drone footage and underwater counting, we were able to track the abundance of those two species before, during, and after reopening and thus investigate the impact of provisioning on wild shark populations. The absence of any stimulus during this long period resulted in almost total desertion of the site by the elasmobranchs. However, 1 day prior to reopening, some individuals of both species positively reacted to the single acoustic stimulus of an engine boat, showing the resilience of conditioning, and some elasmobranchs reacted to acoustic and olfactive stimuli linked to the provisioning practice from the first day after reopening. During the first 2 weeks after reopening, the abundance of both species remained at reduced levels comparable to those observed between 2008 and 2010 for sharks; i.e., around 9 animals in the presence of local tourists. Pre‐lockdown abundance levels, reaching approximatively 15 individuals for sharks and 10 for rays, were considered restored 1 and 2 months after reopening for blacktip reef sharks and pink whiprays, respectively. These findings improve our capacity to better understand the potential effects of artificial provisioning tourism on the abundance of elasmobranchs by showing that conditioning is resilient for several weeks, suggesting that intermittent interruption of elasmobranchs feeding would not really help to decrease its impact on animal welfare.

Tourism based on elasmobranchs, whereby participants seek contact with sharks and rays in their natural environment, is a fastgrowing activity (Clua et al., 2011; Gallagher & Hammerschlag, 2011; Zimmerhackel et al., 2019) . To maximize the chances of encounters or to aggregate animals at the same location, many tour operators use provisioning, a practice that includes simple attraction by olfactory stimulus (chumming) and active feeding of elasmobranchs (see review by Gallagher et al., 2015) . Shark and ray tourism, attracting more than 500,000 participants expending around USD 314 million per year globally, has clear economic benefits and may lead to greater willingness to conserve these animals by governments and the general public (Cisneros-Montemayor et al., 2013; Clua et al., 2011; Vianna et al., 2012; Zimmerhackel et al., 2018) . Accordingly, it may help to meet the urgent need for measures to preserve shark and ray populations, many of which have declined at a worldwide scale and, in some cases, become functionally extinct (Dulvy et al., 2014; Macneil et al., 2020) . This conservation application is particularly important because many elasmobranchs are considered keystone species (Stevens et al., 2000) .

The provisioning of sharks and rays also raises concerns regarding the potential ecological effects on the animals. Indeed, previous studies highlighted some negative impacts such as modification of the composition of elasmobranch communities (Brunnschweiler et al., 2014; Meyer et al., 2009) , reduced mobility or habitat shifts (Bruce & Bradford, 2013; Clua et al., 2010; Corcoran et al., 2013; Huveneers et al., 2013; Mourier et al., 2021) , altered activity patterns (Barnett et al., 2016; Bruce & Bradford, 2013; Corcoran et al., 2013) , the transmission of ectodermal parasites (Semeniuk et al., 2009; Semeniuk & Rothley, 2008) , alteration of physiological characteristics (Semeniuk et al., 2009) , and elevated intra-and interspecific competition (Brunnschweiler et al., 2014; Clua et al., 2010; Newsome et al., 2004; Semeniuk & Rothley, 2008) . However, other studies did not show any significant negative impacts on ecology and behavior of targeted elasmobranchs species including white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) (Laroche et al., 2007) , Caribbean reef sharks (Carcharhinus perezii) (Maljković & Côté, 2011) , tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) (Hammerschlag et al., 2012) , bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) (Abrantes et al., 2018; Brunnschweiler & Barnett, 2013) , and juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) (Heinrich et al., 2021) . Thus, shark provisioning appears to have differential effects depending upon practices, with hand or surface feeding facilitating the development of agonistic behavior in sharks for instance (Clua, 2018) , and species, with resident species potentially more affected than highly mobile species (Mourier et al., 2021) .

Wildlife provisioning also creates unprecedented opportunities for scientific data collection, aggregating animals that are difficult to study without baiting due to their low density, solitary behavior, or pelagic environment (Bègue et al., 2020; Brena et al., 2015 Brena et al., ,2018 Gallagher & Hammerschlag, 2011; Meyer et al., 2009) . Flourishing shark and ray watching also promotes the development of participatory science, involving tourists in the production of scientific research and raising their awareness on elasmobranch conservation (Gallagher et al., 2015; Mieras et al., 2017; Ward-Paige et al., 2020) .

Finally, the ecological and economic importance of elasmobranchs for local communities has the potential to enhance the creation of protected areas to better conserve these often highly threatened species and potentially benefit the entire ecosystem (Govan et al., 2008; Jupiter et al., 2014; Ward-Paige et al., 2020) .

While some effects of chronic feeding on shark and ray populations have been studied, responses to a sudden prolonged break of this stimulus have rarely been observed in the wild (but see Huveneers et al., 2021) . In fish, long-term retention of information for activities such as food retrieval is traded-off with the benefits of discarding memory in favor of reduced energy expenditure and flexibility (Fuss & Schluessel, 2015) . Thus, elasmobranchs are hypothesized to exhibit memory windows that vary with task and the behavioral ecology of the species considered. Some sharks exhibit considerable information retention capacities ranging from 24 h to more than 40 days in juvenile Port-Jackson sharks (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) (Guttridge & Brown, 2014) , more than 10 weeks in some adult lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) (Clark, 1959) , more than 12 weeks in juveniles of the same species (Heinrich et al., 2021) , and more than 50 weeks in some juvenile grey bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) (Fuss & Schluessel, 2015) . However, little information, if any, is available on the memory capacities of wild pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai) and blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus). These two species are highly targeted by lagoon-based provisioning in French Polynesia, particularly at the touristic site of Tiahura in Moorea. From March 20 to April 30, 2020, a total break of provisioning was observed at the Tiahura site due to a COVID-19 lockdown, as in multiple tourist spots worldwide (Bates et al., 2021) .

This historic event induced the first globally considerable slowing of human activity, termed "anthropause" , where short-and long-term effects on biodiversity are currently being evaluated worldwide (Bates et al., ,2021 Corlett et al., 2020) .

Thus, this 6-week complete break of provisioning activities offered a unique opportunity to contribute to an unprecedent global research effort (Bates et al., 2021) .

In elasmobranchs, the deconditioning process (i.e., the decline of response) following cessation of provisioning can manifest as (i) a lower reaction to the noise of boat engines associated with baiting;

(ii) augmentation of the distance to human-feeders and tourists; (iii) an increase in the time before contact with a familiar attractant and a reduction in speed of approach when food is released; and (iv) a reduction in the number of individuals seen simultaneously on the site. The reconditioning processes, characterized by a return to usual behavioral responses, have been only described once for wild provisioned white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in a similar COVID-19

context . Conditioned elasmobranchs targeted in this study were mainly lagoon-resident and may present highly differential behavioral responses relative to those of white sharks. Thus, this situation offered a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of cessation of provisioning and the resumption of touristic activities on the behavior and ecology of elasmobranchs.

The study was carried out on the Tiahura Marine Reserve, located in the North-West of the island of Moorea (17°30′S; 149°51′W), belonging to the Society Archipelago in French Polynesia (Figure 1a ). This lagoon site is surrounded by a central channel, with depths between 2 and 7 meters, and shallow coral reefs (Kiszka et al., 2016) ( Figure 1b) . The provisioning site in Tiahura shows a total surface area of approximately 4470 m 2 , with a very shallow water area (<1.5 meters) covered by sand where people can easily stand. This convenient access allowed the development of touristic activities on the area, targeting two elasmobranchs species: blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai). These two species share their habitat in the lagoons of French Polynesia, although blacktip reef sharks are also present in the fore-reef area (Gaspar et al., 2008; Mourier et al., 2013) . Both species are globally declining in numbers and are listed on the IUCN Red List as "Near threatened" and "Vulnerable", respectively (Heupel, 2009; Manjaji Matsumoto et al., 2016) . Daily and year-round provisioning of both sharks and rays has been carried out on Tiahura since the 1980s (and inconsistently before), usually with fish discards and frozen squids (Clua et al., 2011; Mourier et al., 2021) . Both professional operators who can bring up to 50 tourists per boat and individual users can share the area, which receives an average daily human attendance of around 100 people and up to almost 500 for special occasions such as Polynesian holidays when locals mix with tourists (Buray, 2015) .

Overall, animal-based tourism in French Polynesia attracts around 420,000 participants every year, and shallow water (lagoon) feeding of elasmobranchs accounts for 145,000 tourists per year (35%) through six different islands; Moorea island accounts for an average of 40,000 people per year (9.5%) (Lagouy & Clua, 2016) .

Both species are strongly conditioned to people, displaying strong attenuation of their fear of humans when in the presence of an unconditioned stimulus (US) that is related to food and smell and associated as a reward. Consequently, they react positively to a conditioned stimulus (CS, Pavlov, 1927) , i.e., the noise of boat motor, increasing their speed, and swimming in a circle. Additionally, sharks and rays are usually fed regularly during the day and consequently anticipate the arrival of boats one or 2 h before feeding hours (Gaspar et al., 2008) .

Pre-lockdown abundances of elasmobranchs were defined previously in the study site in Tiahura in three studies: Study 1: Mourier et al., 2012; Study 2: Kiszka et al., 2016; Study 3: Buray, 2015 ( Table 1) . Abundance data from studies 1 and 3 were collected similarly, using in-water sampling, whereas Study 2 used UAV overflights to estimate the number of animals in the area.

Comparisons between data of blacktip reef shark abundances were explored from the original data sets for all three studies. Due to the suddenness and the impossibility to anticipate the lockdown decision, no data were collected right before the closure of the provisioning activity. Nevertheless, according to experts and professional touristic operators, the average abundance of sharks and rays appears to be similar and maximal since Studies 2 and 3. Thus, we defined these values as "Business As Usual" (BAU) and considered them as the pre-lockdown reference for abundance.

Following the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, an official lockdown was implemented on March 20, 2020, in French Polynesia, which carried out complete removal of human presence and activity in the feeding spot of Tiahura for a 6-week period. Comm.).

In order to confirm the expert observer results and to record the number of sharks and rays simultaneously present, a 10-min UAV survey session was implemented at 10 a.m. on 29 and April 30, 2020. The drone flights were conducted using a DJI Mavic 2 Pro UAV quadcopter equipped with a Hasselblad L1D-20c camera, allowing us to capture 20-megapixel aerial shots and 4K HDR video.

The Mavic 2 Pro includes a multi-axis flight controller, GPS, and compass that allow for stable flight, maintenance of a consistently chosen altitude of 60 meters, wind compensation, station holding, and reliable user control.

The data collection focusing on elasmobranch abundances was carried out 1-3 times a day from May 1, 2020, the day of reopening after lockdown, to May 15, 2020, totaling 31 dives, in the presence of favorable climatic conditions (unaltered visibility, moderate current). Three additional dives were conducted in June 2020

at 10 a.m. in order to record elasmobranch abundance in the area 1 month after reopening. Despite the low amount of data collected in June, samplings sessions were separated into two groups-"early post-lockdown" with May data and "late post-lockdown" with June data-in order to highlight the possible differences in terms of elasmobranchs abundance. Diver results (see below) were compared to UAV data, collected at the beginning (4 days, between 1 and May 5, 2020) and at the end of the post-lockdown period (3 days, during late post-lockdown dives). During lockdown, a 10-min stationary UAV survey was performed with the same equipment, at the same height.

The underwater diver surveys were conducted by a qualified and trained freediver from an independent boat, who counted and i.e., at 10 a.m., 12 a.m., and 4 p.m.. During each count, the diver recorded the number of people present in the water, boats with (tour operators, jet skis, private boats) or without motors (standup paddle, kayak, pirogue), and whether provisioning occurred or not. The presence/absence of the sharks and rays targeted was evaluated four times: at the entrance of the diver in the water, after 10 min, after 20 min, and at the end of each session.

The counting of the sharks was carried out with the help of photo-identification techniques such as the identification of individual shape of margins separating black, white, and brown color patterns on both sides of the dorsal fin as well as other distinctive body marks such as scars, notches, and dots (Mourier et al., 2012; Porcher, 2005) . Similarly, rays can be differentiated using the dorsal and ventral color shapes and patterns. Sex was determined by the presence or absence of claspers for both species. Such information about shark and ray individual discrimination allowed us to avoid counting them twice and thus to generate more accurate measures of abundance. Identification was facilitated by the excellent visibility of the site (Figure 1 ), allowing photos and videos to be taken to confirm the identity of the animals observed.

Statistical analyses were completed using R software (V 2.0.4; R Core Team, 2020). Statistical significance was tested at the p-value <.05 level. Anthropogenic variables, including information on boats, and people present on the site, were tested for collinearity using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Low multicollinearity, expressed by a VIF < 5 was revealed, suggesting low collinearity between predictor variables for the abundance of the two species of elasmobranchs.

Pearson correlations were performed between the number of sharks and rays and the anthropogenic variables in order to detect possible associations between animal and human presence. Comparisons between drone and observer data were performed using χ 2 tests TA B L E 1 Overview of the publications used as references for pre-lockdown assessment in the present study 

This study was conducted under a special permit issued by the section (Natural changes in responsiveness). The elasmobranchs monitored had been targeted by ecotourism practices for years as described above in the "Study area and provisioning activity description" section and thus were highly conditioned to provisioning practices, minimizing the bias that might cause novelty in such a study (Rearing history, Experience). Furthermore, bias linked to potentially higher detectability of bold individuals may exist given that tourists may be perceived as a threat (Biro & Dingemanse, 2008) . However, the long-term conditioning phenomenon likely decreased the natural vigilance of the focal animals being fed and viewed by humans and thus likely allowed shyer individuals to be present simultaneously (Bejder et al., 2009) . Moreover, the excellent visibility at the site may have allowed the detection of individuals positioned more distantly in the visual field of the diver, and potentially displaying lower levels of boldness (Trappability and self-selection, Genetic make-up). According to the above statements, the STRANGEness of the sampling may be considered as low. All potential biases related to the STRANGE framework that could be due to inter-specific and inter-individual differences are discussed in the "Discussion" section.

The observer confined at home did not observe any significant presence of sharks during the lockdown duration. A maximum of one animal quickly crossing the area was observed in the absence of any stimulus. Nevertheless, on April 30, 2020, the observer spotted 9 elasmobranchs (6 sharks and 3 rays) aggregating after the arrival of a motorboat at the provisioning site, potentially stimulating the animals acoustically but without any food release. This was the only event where a boat was anchored in the area during the lockdown period. showing the presence of 20 sharks and 9 rays. All images were taken at 10 a.m. and have been adjusted to optimize shark and ray counts

The UAV videos recorded during the lockdown confirmed these observations with 1 shark and 0 rays counted on April 29, 2020 when no boats were crossing the area (Figure 2a) . The shark seen was traveling without any visible change in swimming speed and only stayed for a few seconds in the UAV frame. By contrast, analysis of drone data recorded April 30, 2020 with a motorboat arriving and anchoring in the area highlighted 6 sharks and 3 rays (Figure 2b ).

Both species remained for several minutes in the area and noticeably increased their speed quickly after the arrival of the boat, with a trajectory directed toward the boat, and circled the boat when it stopped despite the fact that no provisioning occurred.

UAV data and diver data were considered as independent using χ 2 tests during the mutual surveys (p-value >.05). For subsequent statistical analysis, only freediver counts were used, as they provided more samples. Data collected revealed a significant increase in anthropogenic activity between early and late post-lockdown with an intensification of the number of the motor and non-motorboats, the number of boats feeding and the number of people present on Tiahura (Kruskal-Wallis tests: p-value <.05 for all anthropogenic parameters) ( Table 2) . (Table 2) . Shark abundance recorded at early post-lockdown was only comparable to the one measured in Study 1, 10 years before (p-value = .667) and

was significantly lower than the abundances measured in other two previous studies (p-values <.05) (Figure 3 ). Early post-lockdown ray abundance was comparable to late post-lockdown ray abundance (p-value = .372), but was significantly lower than the one measured in Study 2, 6 years before (p-value = .041) (Figure 3 ).

Both species showed an increase in abundance during late postlockdown compared to early post-lockdown; this increase was significant for sharks (p-value = .040) with a mean of 19.92 ± 2.07 individuals but non-significant for rays (p-value = .372) with a mean of 6.58 ± 1.31 animals (Table 2, Figure 3 ). One month after reopening, in June 2021, shark abundance appeared fully recovered to pre-COVID levels and comparable to the ones obtained in Study 2 and Study 3, with a minimum of 17 individuals simultaneously present ( Figure 3a) . Concerning ray abundance, no significant difference was either observed between early and late post-lockdown data or between late post-lockdown and Study 2 counts. This result suggests a return to BAU for rays since June 2020, but with a slower abundance increase than for sharks and a complete recovery fully achieved 1 month later in July 2020 according to tourist operators' estimation ( Figure 3b) . A total of 31 different blacktip reef sharks, including 16 females and 15 males, and of 10 individuals pink whiprays, with 7 females and 3 males, were photo-identified (Appendix S1 

Using drones and underwater observations, we were able to accurately monitor the presence and abundance of two elasmobranch species at a specific feeding site for ecotourism purposes after a 6week break in provisioning. Based on the reaction of several animals from both species to a single acoustic stimulus (a motorboat) 1 day prior to the re-opening of the site, our findings suggest that sharks and rays can remember stimuli for periods exceeding 6 weeks (i.e., we observed a positive reaction to a CS in both species). This result confirms the resilience of conditioning as described following deliberate cessation of artificial stimuli in previous studies for other elasmobranch species (Clark, 1959; Fuss & Schluessel, 2015; Guttridge & Brown, 2014; Heinrich et al., 2021) . The fact that both species were attracted with a single sound stimulus supports F I G U R E 3 Abundance of blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai) furnished by several studies completed in Tiahura.

Boxplots not sharing the same letter are significantly different in pairwise comparisons (p-value <.05). Purple dots represent mean values of the abundance for the study considered. Note that the y-axis varies with species previous findings on Pink whipray (Gaspar et al., 2008) , white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) (Bruce & Bradford, 2013) , and Port-Jackson sharks (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) (Pouca & Brown, 2018) , showing a possible cognitive connection of two linked stimuli (food being the US). In this study, the noise of the engine appears to be an important stimulus that attracts highly conditioned blacktip reef sharks and pink whiprays. Further studies could explore a potential cognitive association between food reward and splashes (as CS) made by tourists practicing snorkeling or paddling in a highly frequented area.

It has been already observed that human-induced noises caused avoidance behavior for whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in the touristic site of Panaon island (Philippines) in 39% of the cases (Araujo et al., 2017) . By implication, elasmobranchs may be able to associate other sound stimuli like splashes to negative events (i.e., disturbance to the animals) or positive events (i.e., food reward). Such noises linked to provisioning participants should be, therefore, considered in future codes of conduct to improve the quality and safety of the experience. Indeed, even if all paddling noises cannot be avoided, tour operators could raise awareness about reducing splash entry in the water from boats and loud fin kicking when swimming. Notably, the number of provisioning boats in our study area was significantly higher for late post-lockdown than for early post-lockdown, and the amounts and types of food and the duration of exposure were not standardized and sometimes difficult to assess, possibly biasing our results. Nevertheless, a recent study suggests that the reward magnitude has a limited effect on learning rates (Heinrich et al., 2020) when it is hypothesized that CS could play an important role in associations made by sharks with the presence of baits. Thus, the bias potentially caused by the possible differences in provisioning effort between early and late post-lockdown may be considered as minimal, as CS was present since the first day of reopening.

Previous studies have shown that in some places, focal species, such as bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) and whitetip reef sharks (Trianodon obesus), are not dependent on the provisioning activities as a significant food source (Abrantes et al., 2018) . However, heavy dependence has been observed in some other species, such as southern stingrays (Dasyatis Americana) (Semeniuk et al., 2007) . This could be a sign of potential differential effects of artificial feeding depending on species and practices, which may as well occur at an intraspecific level (Brunnschweiler et al., 2017) . Thus, it is expected that elasmobranchs that are fully dependent on daily provisioning activities continue to regularly visit the site, anticipating being fed.

Given that the sharks and rays in Tiahura completely deserted the area during the lockdown, they may not depend on this feeding activity to sustain and satisfy their nutritional needs. However, further studies focusing on food intake would be needed to confirm this observation.

The differences observed in presence-absence patterns and return to BAU between sharks and rays could be linked to the different ecologies of these two species. Indeed, blacktip reef

sharks are ram ventilators that must remain continuously swimming (Bernal et al., 2012) . By contrast, pink whiprays spend most of their time motionless, sitting on (or in) the sand to save energy and avoid predation. Such a difference in their behavioral ecology and respective capacities to explore their environment could explain the slower response of rays compared to sharks to relocate to the provisioning site in spite of the return of daily olfactory and acoustic stimuli. Another explanation could be linked to differences in auditory capacities for sharks relative to rays, with the former being more efficient.

Despite the majority of photo-identified individuals displaying an increased probability of being present at the feeding site with time, strong inter-individual differences were highlighted.

This intra-specific variation could be linked to physiological differences. A sudden restart of artificial provisioning could lead to a feeling of satiety owing to important and unexpected food intake.

A physiological shift may be needed from natural levels of eating to chronic artificial feeding (Leigh et al., 2017; Papastamatiou et al., 2007) . Sharks fed first after the reopening, still in a slow metabolism and slow digestion state, may feel "full" quickly and abandon the feeding site a few days after unnatural levels of eating, leaving space for others.

Another explanation could be linked to competition among individuals due to a rapid increase in the number of elasmobranchs F I G U R E 4 Accumulation curve of the individuals photo-identified at the Tiahura site. The blue line represents the accumulation curve for blacktip reef sharks and the red line for pink whiprays. Colored values on the x-axis represent samplings collected during early postlockdown in green (n = 124) and samplings collected during late post-lockdown in purple (n = 12). 95% confidence intervals are highlighted for each curve foraging in the area. Such negative interactions have already been observed for sicklefin lemon sharks (Negaprion acutidens) in another feeding site in Moorea, located on the outer reef, where some animals were displaying wounds inflicted during fights for dominance (Clua et al., 2010) . Particularly strong dominance interactions could have occurred after reopening, but then progressively attenuated with time, allowing coexistence of different individuals in the same area of interest, as has already been shown for tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) around a blue whale carcass (Clua et al., 2013) .

Another explanation could be the existence of clustering in the subpopulation of the elasmobranchs in the Tiahura site, with preferred associations between individuals that did not frequent the site simultaneously, as has been already suggested in the full population of blacktip reef sharks around Moorea island (Mourier et al., 2012) . Residency patterns could also be different between identified individuals with resident, semi-resident, or opportunistic individuals as has been observed in sicklefin lemon shark on a provisioning site (Clua et al., 2010) . The drop of in the probability of the presence of some sharks after 2 weeks could be linked to individual choices, linked to life-history traits (Mourier et al., 2013) or to individual personality (Finger et al., 2017) , with shyer individuals avoiding competition or displaying higher exploratory behavior encouraging foraging on new sites.

Even if it is still too early to evaluate the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the present study on the Tiahura provisioning site in Moorea suggests a limited impact on elasmobranch tourism in the area due to the fast recovery to beforelockdown abundances of blacktip reef sharks and pink whiprays.

Regarding the sustainability of tourism practices, the near desertion of the site during the Anthropause and the decrease in abundance observed at early post-lockdown provide more evidence that feeding elasmobranchs may not necessarily lead to drastic ecological change that cannot be reversed. Whatever their level of conditioning, our results suggest provisioned sharks and rays can adapt when provisioning stops, and then return when provisioning resumes. Those findings are in line with a growing number of studies showing minimal (if any) negative effects of shark feeding on the biology and ecology of some species (Abrantes et al., 2018; Brunnschweiler & Barnett, 2013; Hammerschlag et al., 2012; Heinrich et al., 2021; Laroche et al., 2007; Maljković & Côté, 2011) . Nevertheless, precautionary approaches should be taken to limit the potential negative impact of tourism on species with the high level of residency such as blacktip reef sharks (Mourier et al., 2021) , with a necessity to redesign the activity with sustainable management practices if impacts are documented. It is, however, important to place the potential impacts of these tourism activities in the context of the threats faced by sharks and rays (Healy et al., 2020) . Indeed, fishing and habitat loss remain the main causes of elasmobranch declines, and addressing these threats should remain the priority of conservation efforts for these species (Dulvy et al., 2014; Healy et al., 2020) . Furthermore, the use of codes of conduct standardizing ways to bait animals and to behave in the water during provisioning should help to minimize the potential impacts of this tourism activity on wildlife and on the safety of participants (Abrantes et al., 2018; Clua, 2018; Clua & Torrente, 2015; Gallagher et al., 2015; Healy et al., 2020; Newsome et al., 2004; Zimmerhackel et al., 2019) while increasing the ecological and economic benefits (Semeniuk et al., 2009; Zimmerhackel et al., 2018) . Evidence in the wild, including from this study, reveals strong levels of conditioning in sharks and rays strengthens the need for these codes of conduct to be adopted, implemented, and enforced in every provisioning site around the world. Our study reveals that conditioning stability is so strong that a cessation of the activity, even for several weeks (up to six in this case), has no significant impact on the conditioning of the animals. Therefore, efforts to reduce potentially deleterious effects of provisioning on animals should not rely on temporary feeding stoppages and instead focus on standardizing and optimizing both provisioning practices, which currently vary considerably among operators, as well as human behavior in the water.

This study was conducted under a special permit issued by the Kiszka to provide us with raw data on shark and ray abundance from its sampling in 2014. We acknowledge Aaron Wirsing for useful comments and English language revision.

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

You are what you eat: Examining the effects of provisioning tourism on shark diets

Assessing the impacts of tourism on the world's largest fish Rhincodon typus at Panaon Island, Southern Leyte, Philippines. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Ecotourism increases the field metabolic rate of whitetip reef sharks

Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment

Global Human Confinement Experiment" to investigate biodiversity conservation

Prevalence, persistence and impacts of residual fishing hooks on tiger sharks

Impact assessment research: Use and misuse of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli

Energetics, metabolism, and endothermy in sharks and rays

Sampling bias resulting from animal personality

Shark and ray provisioning: Functional insights into behavioral, ecological and physiological responses across multiple scales

Concede or clash? Solitary sharks competing for food assess rivals to decide

The effects of shark cage-diving operations on the behaviour and movements of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, at the Neptune Islands, South Australia

Longterm changes in species composition and relative abundances of sharks at a provisioning site

Opportunistic visitors: Long-term behavioural response of bull sharks to food provisioning in Fiji

Hand feeding can periodically fuel a major portion of bull shark energy requirements at a provisioning site in Fiji

Étude comportementale des requins sur le site touristique du « ray feeding » de Tiahura à Moorea en Polynésie Française

Global economic value of shark ecotourism: Implications for conservation

Instrumental conditioning of lemon sharks

Managing bite risk for divers in the context of shark feeding ecotourism: A case study from French Polynesia (Eastern Pacific). Tourism Management

Behavioural response of sicklefin lemon sharks Negaprion acutidens to underwater feeding for ecotourism purposes

Business partner or simple catch? The economic value of the sicklefin lemon shark in French Polynesia

Behavioural patterns of a tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) feeding aggregation at a blue whale carcass in Prony Bay

Determining the role of hand feeding practices in accidental shark bites on scuba divers

Supplemental feeding for ecotourism reverses diel activity and alters movement patterns and spatial distribution of the southern stingray, Dasyatis americana

Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation

Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays

Personality in elasmobranchs with a focus on sharks: Early evidence, challenges, and future directions

Something worth remembering: visual discrimination in sharks

Global shark currency: The distribution, frequency, and economic value of shark ecotourism

Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism

Feeding sites frequentation by the pink whipray Himantura fai in Moorea (French Polynesia) as determined by acoustic telemetry

Locally managed marine areas: A guide to supporting community-based adaptive management

Learning and memory in the Port Jackson shark

Don't bite the hand that feeds: assessing ecological impacts of provisioning ecotourism on an apex marine predator

A global review of elasmobranch tourism activities, management and risk. Marine Policy

Short-term impacts of daily feeding on the residency, distribution and energy expenditure of sharks

Effects of reward magnitude and training frequency on the learning rates and memory retention of the Port Jackson shark Heterodontus portusjacksoni

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

The power of national acoustic tracking networks to assess the impacts of human activity on marine organisms during the COVID-19 pandemic

The effects of cage-diving activities on the fine-scale swimming behaviour and space use of white sharks

Locally-managed marine areas: Multiple objectives and diverse strategies

Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to investigate shark and ray densities in a shallow coral lagoon

MultNonParam: Mutlivariate Nonparametric Methods

L'écotourisme animalier en Polynésie française

Effects of provisioning ecotourism activity on the behaviour of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias

The nutritional physiology of sharks

Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks

Effects of tourism-related provisioning on the trophic signatures and movement patterns of an apex predator, the Caribbean reef shark

Pateobatis fai (p. e.T161615A104219816). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Seasonal cycles and long-term trends in abundance and species composition of sharks associated with cage diving ecotourism activities in Hawaii

The economy of shark conservation in the Northeast Pacific: The role of ecotourism and citizen science

Human-induced shifts in habitat use and behaviour of a marine predator: The effects of bait provisioning in the blacktip reef shark

Population structure, spatial distribution and life-history traits of blacktip reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus

Evidence of social communities in a spatially structured network of a free-ranging shark species

Impacts and risks associated with developing, but unsupervised, stingray tourism at Hamelin Bay, Western Australia

The response of gastric pH and motility to fasting and feeding in free swimming blacktip reef sharks, Carcharhinus melanopterus

Conditioned Reflexes

On the gestation period of the blackfin reef shark, Carcharhinus melanopterus, in waters off Moorea. French Polynesia

Food approach conditioning and discrimination learning using sound cues in benthic sharks

COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife

Ethology adopts the STRANGE framework for animal behaviour research, to improve reporting standards

A multi-attribute trade-off approach for advancing the management of marine wildlife tourism: A quantitative assessment of heterogeneous visitor preferences. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Costs of group-living for a normally solitary forager: Effects of provisioning tourism on southern stingrays Dasyatis americana

Using fattyacid profile analysis as an ecologic indicator in the management of tourist impacts on marine wildlife: A case of stingray-feeding in the Caribbean

The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems

Socio-economic value and community benefits from sharkdiving tourism in Palau: A sustainable use of reef shark populations

Tourism-driven ocean science for sustainable use: A case study of sharks in Fiji. bioRxiv

How STRANGE are your study animals?

Evidence of increased economic benefits from shark-diving tourism in the Maldives

How shark conservation in the Maldives affects demand for dive tourism

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of the article at the publisher's website.How to cite this article: Séguigne, C., Mourier, J., Vignaud, T., Buray, N., & Clua, É. (2021) . Effects of a COVID-19 lockdowninduced pause and resumption of artificial provisioning on blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and pink whiprays (Pateobatis fai) in French Polynesia (East-Pacific).Ethology, 00, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13246