key: cord-0827105-n8ggv3ve authors: Norrie, Caroline; Woolham, John; Samsi, Kritika; Manthorpe, Jill title: Personal Assistants’ role in infection prevention and control: Their experiences during the Covid‐19 pandemic date: 2021-11-03 journal: Health Soc Care Community DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13624 sha: 7d6ca06d07d7db2c608c06d714cbb6615c55da90 doc_id: 827105 cord_uid: n8ggv3ve Personal Assistants (PA) or client‐hired workers are directly employed by people needing care and support, often making use of government funding. In the context of Covid‐19, questions emerged about how this workforce is supported to practice safely. This paper reports PAs’ understanding and views of infection control during the early months of the Covid‐19 pandemic in England. Telephone interviews were undertaken with 41 PAs between 16th April and 21st May 2020. PAs were recruited from a sample that had participated in a previous study in 2014–16. Interview questions focused on changes arising from the pandemic. Data were transcribed and analysed using Framework analysis. This paper focuses on PAs’ perceptions of their role and responsibilities in preventing and managing infection. Arising themes were identified about barriers and facilitators affecting infection control in five areas: accessing information, social isolation, handwashing, hygiene, personal protective equipment and potential attitude to vaccines. Infection prevention and control are under‐researched in the home care sector generally and efforts are needed to develop knowledge of how to manage infection risks in home settings by non‐clinically trained staff such as PAs and how to engage home care users with these efforts, especially when they are the direct employers. icalised' relationship (Woolham et al., 2019, p. 77 Not all PAs felt this way; some were interested in taking on more health-focused roles . Data in this present paper come from a study of PAs undertaken in Spring 2020 during the first UK Covid-19 lockdown in England What is known about this subject • Infection control has been an important part of the response to • Little is known about Personal Assistants or directly employed care workers during Covid-19. • Research on infection control when care is delivered at home is limited; guidance does not always support untrained care workers working in domestic settings. • This study provides new information about Personal Assistants' activity in infection control and prevention efforts during the Covid-19 pandemic. • It provides an analysis of Personal Assistants' reports of isolating, handwashing, hygiene, access to and use of personal protective equipment and views of potential vaccines. • It suggests the value of Personal Assistants being included in contingency planning and emergency response initiatives. (see Woolham et al., 2020) . It investigated what steps, including infection control procedures, PAs were taking to protect themselves, their families, and their clients and how the pandemic was impacting on their work relationships with employers but also their families . This present paper focuses on an arising theme; PAs' knowledge, understanding and views of their part in infection control in these early months of Covid-19. It highlights barriers and facilitators to effective infection prevention and control in five areas: accessing information, social isolation, handwashing, hygiene, PPE and attitudes to vaccination. This was a qualitative study consisting of telephone interviews with 41 PAs. In April 2020, we re-contacted the sample obtained for a previous study that had interviewed 105 PAs from across England. Recruitment had largely been undertaken through disability organisations some of which assist with PA recruitment and payroll management. An information sheet was attached to the 2020 email and PAs were invited to return a consent form if they wished to participate. The email also included details of potential support organisations. Another two PAs who had not been part of the original study were invited to participate. Fifty PAs agreed to be interviewed in the new study and 41 were able to be interviewed within the study's time period. Non-respondents were followed up twice. Two from the original study proved uncontactable, and 48 did not respond. Several (14 of the original sample) replied to say they were no longer working as PAs. All interviews were conducted by telephone by one team member (JW) between 16th April and 21st May 2020. A semi-structured interview schedule was devised consisting of 27 questions focusing on Covid-19's impact on PA work. All interviews were audio-recorded with consent and fully transcribed. Interviews lasted from 20 to 60 min duration. Each participant was mailed a note of thanks and £20 in appreciation of their time. Transcribed data were pseudoanonymised before being entered into NVivo data analysis software (Woolf & Silver, 2017 ). The main research question was: What is the impact of COVID-19 on the working relationship of PAs and their employers (clients)? This included a focus on isolation, safety, work practices, accessing information, multi-agency working, and their working terms and conditions. Data were analysed using Framework analysis (Ritchie & Spencer, 1994) based on the interview questions. Emerging themes were coded inductively throughout the analysis and added to the coding scheme. Full team discussions ensured new codes were checked, validated by the team and consistency of coding was maintained. The research team (with backgrounds in gerontology, health services research, family care and local authority research) was working from home and met online regularly to discuss study progress and emerging findings, as well as sharing relevant information about social care guidance as this emerged in the early weeks of the pandemic. Data were further analysed for this present paper using key word automated text searches within NVivo to interrogate aspects of infection prevention and control, e.g. handwashing, virus and cleaning. A total of 41 respondents participated. Respondents were overwhelmingly female (95%) and white (83%) with 93% of British nationality. Their mean age was 48.5 years (ranging from 21 to 71 years). Nearly half (49%) were caring for another family member, and a similar proportion was caring for their children in addition to their paid care work (see Table 1 ). Barriers and facilitators to effective infection prevention and control at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic are presented from the PAs' accounts with reference to accessing information, social isolation, handwashing, hygiene, PPE and attitude to vaccines. Most PAs reported receiving little if any targeted information about infection control and Covid-19 at the start of the pandemic. PAs were effectively left out of early government pandemic guidance for professionals in health and social care (Hodgson et al., 2020) . Like the general population, most PAs received information about infection control and protecting themselves and their clients from the general media. Some felt they needed to decide for themselves which sources were more factual or credible than others. Most PAs referred to BBC news and daily government briefings and updates, as key sources of information. As government guidance was changing, there was a need to keep up to date. Most participants used their own initiative: PA: So every day I look at www.gov.uk and update my- Int: Because the guidance is changing, isn't it? PA: Yeah, so just to make sure that I'm up to date with everything, I check it every day before I go out… Those PAs with links with a disabled people's organisation were the exception as they reported receiving useful information, including advice about socially isolating (if experiencing symptoms or had had contact with symptomatic others). A small minority received regular updates from their Local Authority (council) via their contacts with these disabled people's organisations. These were considered invaluable, as they offered rolespecific advice about accessing PPE or more information about protocols: … but certainly (named) County Council and their team, I just feel… because as a PA you're very solitary, you make your own decisions, you haven't got a boss, you don't answer to anybody really, except yourself, and so at times like this you want to say, help, you know, where do I get that glove, or what's the protocol for this, and you've got this little invisible body, if I want to pick up the phone, I can phone them, but it's there and that's a valuable resource and they've really stepped up to the mark, so I feel fully supported, if I need it. PA550310 Most (79%) PAs in the original study had experience of working in a care setting before becoming a PA and so had some knowledge of infection control. Many (58%) had experience of caring for someone in their family. In the Covid-19 context, some drew on their experience and related this to the current situation: I worked ten years for (local authority) social services and ten years for [Agency] both agencies, very red hot about everything…. and I'm quite hot on all of that because I've had very good training, and also because I tend to be that way personally…. With regard to Covid-19, if I wanted any information, (disabled people's organisation) do send it but, to be honest, I understand about silo infections and crosscontamination, all kinds, yeah. PA550288. Most PA interviewed had stopped or reduced care work during the early stages of the pandemic to control the spread of the infection to their clients and their own families (not working, n = 15; reduced hours n = 13; no impact = 10; more/slightly more work n = 3). Some could rely on a spouse/partner to maintain the family income and so were less affected by not working. However, one PA felt that worry about loss of income might result hypothetically in a PA discounting how unwell they felt and continuing working. For those who chose to give up working, they reported that the care tasks the PAs had formerly undertaken were now being undertaken by family members, a smaller number of other PAs (where a team of PAs was employed) or by agency care workers who had been previously working alongside PAs. Some PAs continued to carry out tasks at a physical distance, such as delivering TA B L E 1 Participants' demographic details (n = 41) | 5 NORRIE Et al. shopping and telephoning clients to check on safety and wellbeing, while choosing not to enter their clients' homes and risk passing on infection. Of those who were still working in clients' homes, some described great efforts, including putting themselves or family members at risk, to ensure their client continued receiving their support: So we were actually talking about the scenario of my employer going to hospital, thinking about it … he would need at least one of the PAs to stay with him, which happened in the past. I think we would probably consider someone either living with him, we have a few PAs who have no families and they're single that would possibly cover, but if… I would cover as well probably, I would consider moving to him for a meantime to stay away from my family. PA550302 Some PAs continued to work alongside clients' families, and described abiding by reduced contact rules: We don't go for a walk, we don't go to the park. We go for a drive, which we've been authorised to do, so we've got an amendment to his care plan where we are allowed out for three short trips a day; originally that was one, but this week we've had that extended to three. We don't have any visits from any of the other workers that were working with [client], we don't sit in the garden, we obviously don't have any visitors, but we don't do any outdoor activity that we did before, so yeah, he finds all that strange. We were Hand washing was frequently mentioned as part of infection control. The importance of cleaning, sterilisation and disinfection was mentioned by several PAs who recounted their efforts to access products during shortages (at the pandemic's start) and their use: As soon as Covid was around, I was washing down, I was using hand gels to go in and occasionally I was using plastic aprons, where appropriate, which is a must when I was getting a bit more intimate with her, or changing her bed [] And then, as Covid got more and more serious, I was not only cleaning my hands and cleaning myself and making sure I didn't take anything in or out, I was actually cleaning all the doorknobs as I went in, I was cleaning the car doorknobs, I was doing the steering wheel and I was being very careful that anything from her didn't go into my car, Given our interviews were undertaken in the early months of the pandemic when there were severe problems accessing PPE in the UK and internationally (McFadden et al., 2021; Rowe et al., 2020) , this was much discussed. PAs reported feeling overlooked by the authorities in relation to PPE which caused worry about infecting themselves, their clients and their own families. A few PAs in contact with disabled people's organisations had been given information about PPE regional distribution centres but reported being unable to access them because they had no CQC registration number. Sourcing PPE was difficult for many at this time, but PAs were also concerned about the expense: Gloves and masks you have to buy; they're very difficult to get hold of. This woman who's making them, a friend of a friend who's a carer, and they're £4 each and they're patterned so they look alright as well and they're £4 each but I can wash them, so I'm not wasting money that I ain't got. I can actually put it on, take it off, wash -put it into a bag, take it home -wash it and put another one on. PA550320 Self-employed PAs generally accepted their responsibility for providing their own PPE, but those who were directly employed were unclear about whose responsibility it was to provide it: … to be honest, to perhaps expect people that perhaps have disabilities and things like that to be able to organise getting PPE isn't perhaps the best idea, especially some people might have learning disabilities and things and be supported with their family, but families are just ordinary people, and trying to source government supplies from an ordinary person when even the frontline staff haven't got enough supplies is obviously a major issue. PA550295 As noted earlier, in our previous study, many PAs stated that they did not use PPE (such as gloves or an apron during personal care). This situation had changed; all PAs in the present study stated that they now wore PPE if they could get it and most said they would continue to do so. Only one PA reported the cost of PPE as being a reason for sub-optimal infection control: On the bus I do wear it, but when I get to the client's house I don't, I have to take it off. I prefer not to wear it [mask] because I have to buy it. I told her (client) I bought two face masks for £3.50, she said that's not fair, and yet still she's not providing it. [] By the time I wear it on the street, I have to throw that one when I get there. PA550321 PAs discussed their attitudes to annual flu vaccines (recommended for UK health and care staff) and those of their clients. PAs' attitudes to annual flu vaccinations were mixed; many PAs had not 'got around to it', with some preferring not to have this vaccination-either because of concerns that it would make them ill, not feeling they were in a vulnerable category, because they said that they had a 'needle phobia', because when they had asked to be vaccinated, they had been told they were not eligible, or that they felt they had had a reaction: [Doctor] just said I couldn't have it done because I wasn't… I think she said I wasn't a member of the family looking after the person, I was like a private carer and I should have to pay for it. PA550305 or where air is mechanically circulated (Colburn, 2020) . PAs felt and were 'unknown' to health and care services, despite their work income coming from public money in the main. Infection prevention for themselves and for their clients was jeopardised as PAs and home care staff were unable to access PPE in the early months of the pandemic as widely reported (Cook, 2020; Department of Health Northern Ireland, 2020; Home and Community Care Ireland, 2020; McFadden et al., 2021; Scottish Parliament, 2020) , amplified by PAs having no 'proof' of their care worker status or managerial oversight and support. Consideration is needed about whether, given these are largely publicly funded workers, their details should be collected by LAs, for example, in the setting up, review and monitoring of care plans. PAs could then be contacted in emergencies and best use made of their resource since they would have access to information about infection control and lines of assistance. During the early months of the pandemic in England CQC registered home care providers were asked to submit various data to a Home Care Tracker including numbers of service users, numbers of Covid-19 cases, workforce absences and PPE levels. The Tracker however only covers regulated organisations, prompting a call (Hodgson et al., 2020) for improved data across different social care settings to enable local public health teams to identify high risk areas, to put in place infection control measures and improve local co-ordination. Again, PAs would seem to be left out of such data collection proposals since they are unknown to authorities and the regulator, and they are unregistered workers. PAs were generally not included in information or guidance at the time of the study. They had to source information and products themselves and make their own decisions in these early stages of the pandemic. Most of this study's PAs had background, experience and some training in care work and were generally aware of infection control practices. However, about a fifth had no experience in the sector and, for them, decision-making around best practices would seem less straightforward. Access to training for those new to the sector may therefore be needed by this group as well as more general updating. Standardised training for all health and care support workers was recommended in the Cavendish report (Department of Health, 2013) but in this, and more generally, PAs are not included. Indeed, the Care Certificate provides a minimum standard, transferable, qualification, but is strongly criticised for not being mandatory (Gilding, 2015 (Gilding, , 2017 Peate, 2015; Pile, 2015; Willis, 2015) . This means that even those joining the PA workforce from the regulated sector do not necessarily bring any knowledge from previous training. It is moreover important not to over-emphasise training, since a recent observational study of US home nurses reported their average hand hygiene adherence rate was 45.6% (similar to rates in hospital and long-term care facilities) and suggested a need to highlight the connection between poor hand hygiene and infection transmission (McDonald et al., 2020) . There is a longstanding debate about which if any social care staff should undertake more complex healthcare activities in community services some of which involve procedures which risk infection transmission (England & Alcorn, 2018; Shang et al., 2014) . In this present study, some participants reported considering changing jobs, due to the insecurity, poor remuneration and lack of training opportunities of PA work. However, the care sector as a whole needs reinforcing; research with other care workers during Covid-19 in England suggested a key factor affecting their mental health was the feeling of being under-appreciated compared to NHS staff (Nyashanu et al., 2020) and Watterson (2020) concluded that the care sector had been abjectly neglected when compared to the health sector. In this present study, family members had taken over much of PAs' work, with some PAs considering this would be unsustainable . This confirms others' findings (Department of Health Northern Ireland, 2020; Giebel et al., 2020; Scottish Parliament, 2020) of the extra work for family carers during Covid-19. Information collected by LAs about PAs would also enable contingency plans to be put in place to ensure the safety and prevention of infection among clients should a PA or family carer becomes seriously ill and family cover cannot be arranged. Finally, the views of PAs, and their clients, about vaccines are important to consider. Reluctance to have flu vaccines, despite government guidance stressing their importance (NHS, 2020), suggests wider public health messaging about vaccines for people who are at substantial risk of contagion and those working for them may need to be developed. This reticence was reported early on in relation to care home workers being offered Covid-19 vaccines (Pyman, 2020) , suggesting that encouragement for care workers needs to be sector specific. Provisional analysis of deaths involving the coronavirus (COVID-19), by different occupational groups, among men and women aged 20 to 64 years in England and Wales Controlling Covid-19 transference Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic-A narrative review s-covid -19-guida nce-for-peopl e-recei ving-direc t-payme nts/coron aviru s-covid -19-qa-for-peopl e-recei ving-a-perso nal-budge t-orperso nal-healt h-budget Department of Health Northern Ireland Personalisation and pandemic: An unforeseen collision course? Adult social care and COVID-19: Assessing the policy response in England so far. Health Foundation Growing care gaps, shrinking state? Home care workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act Questioning "choice": A multinational metasynthesis of research on directly funded home-care programs for older people Decision-making for receiving paid home care for dementia in the time of COVID-19: A qualitative study The Care Certificate Standards: An introduction Implementing the Care Certificate: A developmental tool or a tick-box exercise? Covid-19: Excess all cause mortality in domiciliary care Briefing: Adult social care and COVID-19. Assessing the impact on social care users and staff in England so far. Health Foundation. Home and Community Care Ireland Caring in Covid-19: Personal Assistants' Changing Relationships with their Clients' Family Members Characterizing the nature of home care work and occupational hazards: A developmental intervention study Observation of hand hygiene practices in home health care The Role of Coping in the Wellbeing and Work-Related Quality of Life of UK Health and Social Care Workers during COVID-19 Who can have the flu vaccine? Skill mix: The potential for personal assistants to undertake health-related tasks for people with personal health budgets Triggers of mental health problems among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in private care homes and domiciliary care agencies: Lived experiences of care workers in the Midlands region Personal health budgets for patients with complex needs Care Certificate: Not worth the paper it is written on? Implementing the Care Certificate as positively as possible What is the risk of transmission of COVID-19 when delivering domiciliary care, and how effective are interventions that aim to minimise that risk? A rapid review ?id=835a0 05a8b 301ce 13aa8 ce50f 8724a05 Nearly half of care home staff might not take Covid vaccine-As healthcare bosses call on ministers to make jabs compulsory. Daily Mail Occupational health of home care aides: Results of the safe home care survey Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research How has Covid-19 impacted on care and support at home in Scotland? The Scottish Parliament Personal Assistance Relationships, Power, ethics and emotions A research agenda for infection prevention in home healthcare The prevalence of infections and patient risk factors in home health care: A systematic review Individual Employers and the Personal Assistant Workforce. Skills for Care COVID-19 in the UK and Occupational Health and Safety: Predictable not Inevitable Failures by Government, and Trade Union and Nongovernmental Organization Responses Directly employed care workers Raising the Bar: Shape of Caring: A Review of the Future Education and Training of Registered Nurses and Care Assistants. Nursing and Midwifery Council Qualitative analysis using NVivo: The fivelevel QDA® method Roles, responsibilities, and relationships: Hearing the voices of Personal Assistants and Directly Employed Care Workers. NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, The Policy Institute The impact of the coronavirus (Covid-19) on people who work as social care Personal Assistants. NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, The Policy Institute, King's College London Personal Assistants' role in infection prevention and control: Their experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic