key: cord-0825087-l9lhqhrg authors: Rediske, Graciele; Lorenzoni, Lauren Peres; Rigo, Paula Donaduzzi; Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse; Michels, Leandro; Marchesan, Tiago Bandeira title: The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the economic viability of distributed photovoltaic systems in Brazil date: 2022-03-28 journal: Environ Prog Sustain Energy DOI: 10.1002/ep.13841 sha: 09d49696873cbb8b14ac6f9e0f74d5265e9d143b doc_id: 825087 cord_uid: l9lhqhrg Electricity consumption in Brazil increases significantly, making feasibility studies to diversify the Brazilian electricity mix with other renewable sources become essential. However, the electricity market continues to be primarily driven by government or regulatory incentives and economic status. With the coronavirus pandemic since the beginning of 2020, the market has been undergoing significant changes that cause uncertainty in consumer investments in grid‐connected photovoltaic systems. This article presents an economic feasibility analysis of photovoltaic system installation for the Brazilian residential sector, estimating a cash and term investment and comparing the viability of the investment before the global pandemic (December 2019) with the pandemic scenario (April 2021) for each of the 27 Brazilian capitals. The baseline scenario for economic feasibility analysis calculations considered a power system of 4 kW. The results show that the effects of the pandemic in the electricity market were positive in the feasibility of investing in grid‐connected photovoltaic systems. Also, financing the system increases the chances of profitability. The current scenario is possibly the most attractive ever experienced by potential investors. However, this favorable scenario could decline in the coming years due to climatic and governmental factors. The electricity demand has increased over the years due to demographic evolution and the growth of economic activity. 1 With the significant increase in electricity consumption, public policies to expand energy generation have intensified globally. 2, 3 The production of electrical energy through photovoltaic (PV) technology is a particularly efficient initiative with low environmental impact, as PV systems do not emit pollutants in their operation, do not produce noise, and can be installed on residential roofs. 1 Renewable energy production has considerably competed with traditional energy sources, and its notorious growth is due to the incentives through public policies. 4 The Brazilian government launched different incentives to boost the development of renewable sources. In 2012, the Electric Energy Regulatory Agency (ANEEL), through resolution No. 482/2012, introduced a net metering system to promote distributed microgeneration from renewable energy sources. 5 This compensation system allows the active energy injected into the grid to be transferred to the distributor and subsequently compensated with energy consumption. 6 At the end of the month, if generation is more significant than consumption, the remaining balance reduces consumption in some subsequent months. The consumer only pays the basic tariff (30 kWh for single-phase installations, 50 kWh for two-phase, and 100 kWh for three-phase). In addition, in June 2021, the Brazilian President published Decree No. 10387 (incentives to finance infrastructure projects with environmental and social benefits), which encourages environmentally sustainable infrastructure projects and allows for more flexible financing conditions for the electricity sector. 7 Solar energy equipment has its taxes zeroed by the end of 2021 to reduce the amount paid by the consumer and stimulate the solar energy market. 8 PV systems correspond to approximately 95% of all distributed generation (DG) in Brazil. 9 One reason is that Brazil is privileged concerning daily insolation levels. In most country regions, the average daily insolation reaches 6-7 h, with some places reaching 8 h, and radiation levels in the country reach between 2.22 and 6.11 kWh/m 2 per day. 5 Using this potential to supply electricity to residential stretches can be an attractive solution to meet annual energy demand and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Investments in PV energy generate economic benefits for consumers and the country's economy. 10 In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the world was affected by a global pandemic by Coronavirus. The primary guideline to reduce the spread of the virus was to avoid crowds of people. That year, many countries adopted the so-called "lockdown," the most stringent pandemic measure, which requires social distancing by the population. With the global economy almost completely shut down after the declaration of the pandemic, electricity systems around the world faced severe shocks on both the supply and demand sides. 11 As in many countries, Brazil faced a general reduction in electricity consumption, a change in consumption profile, 12 an increase in tariffs, and a decrease in interest rates for financing. A little over a year after the outbreak of the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), which profoundly reversed the national and world scenario, uncertainties related to the future of the pandemic and the economy are still high. Consumers do not feel safe to make a long-term investment, and decision-making in a global crisis scenario becomes difficult. For the distributed PV sector, the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown cause some scenarios. The installation companies are experiencing a shortage of labor, an increase in the cost of logistical time, and even the stagnation of logistics, which generate difficulties in transporting raw materials and semi-finished and finished products. 13 In addition, the subsequent outbreak and steady spread of COVID-2019 abroad could trigger new export demand after the recovery of production in the PV industry, which would increase uncertainty in this industry. Besides, the PV systems investor is dealing with a moment of insecurity in the market and the increase in tariffs, government tax incentives, and falling interest rates. In an economic crisis, banks need to encourage money movement by offering lower rates, such as the Interbank Certificate of Deposit (CDI) index, which was reduced during the pandemic in Brazil. The solar energy development in Brazil is economically viable, but the financial aspect is the investors' primary concern. Understanding the economics of PV systems is one of the most important considerations when deciding on solar energy, especially in times of crisis, as the world is going through with COVID-19. So, this study aims to compare the economic feasibility of installing PV systems for the residential sector before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering the electricity costs and local radiation in each of the 27 Brazilian capitals. The analysis comprises a 4 kW power system which represents, on average, the monthly expenditure of households in the range of 480-710 kW. Residential consumers, belonging to group B1 (residential class and voltage less than 2.3 kV), represent around 29.61% of the country's electricity consumption (EPE, 2019). Given the current economic situation in Brazil, some consumers do not have the monetary amount to invest. Therefore, it was decided to calculate the value of the equipment through financing. The economic viability aims to characterize the enterprise, assess the applicability of the business in the regions studied, make it a determining factor for companies in this field of activity, and serve as a decision tool for homeowners. This section presents the approach followed in this study to assess The total cost of the 4 kWp PV system was obtained in the Strategic Study of DG carried out by Greener. 14 Greener publishes biannual studies carried out with installers companies throughout Brazil, and these studies include final prices charged by them to their customers. From January 2019 to April 2021, prices for small systems varied little. The high dollar raised the purchase prices of imported equipment. However, installers absorbed this cost and reduced their profit margin, keeping prices competitive. Therefore, the cost for the scenario before the pandemic and during it is the same, 4.70 R$/Wp, resulting in a total investment of R$ 18,800.00. This value served as the basis for the calculations of the 27 Brazilian capitals. The intention is to scale PV systems to partially, totally, and excessively supply the average residential electricity demand. PV systems are known for their long service life, reaching over 25 years of full operation. Among the parameters to be analyzed is the annual system efficiency loss, also called the performance degradation rate, defined as the annual reduction rate of the maximum expected power of a PV module or a complete PV system. The degradation rate is associated with the specific PV technology and various factors, such as the system's temperature, humidity, precipitation, dust, and solar irradiation. Manufacturers guarantee that PV modules will provide a performance degradation rate of less than 1% per year during the first 10 years of operation and a maximum of 20% until the end of the modules' useful life. 15 With a performance guarantee of up to 25 years, solar panels guarantee high power, which will decrease at a rate of about 0.7% per year. 16 It means that, even after 25 years of installation, the panels will still work with at least 80% of their initial power. However, the inverters have a shorter useful life, estimating their replacement in approximately 13 years of operation for lowpower residential inverters. The costs related to operation and maintenance refer to hiring teams for cleaning and checking cables, electrical safety systems, and checking the fixing structures on the roofs. For this, according to the prices practiced by the installers, a constant annual value was fixed, which represents 0.5% of the initial investment portion. The average residential tariff has increased by 73.77% in the last 10 years, according to ANEEL data, 17 mainly due to the increase in energy chain costs. The objective of the annual tariff adjustment is to restore the utility's purchasing power. In other words, this constant increase in electricity tariffs will continue to increase, so to calculate the feasibility of a PV system, an increase of 7.37% per year was considered, which reflects the annual historical average. For the financed investment scenario, the option of most Brazilian investors, the calculation considers the system acquisition through financing, according to the budget provided by a credit union. For this purpose, the Interbank Deposit Certificate (CDI) + 0.45% per month for 2021 is applied as an interest rate, with the CDI at an average of 0.22% per month. The CDI in Brazil is used as a reference index for the price of money in the economy, used as a benchmark in many investments. In the system acquisition calculation using the scenario before the Brazilians faced the pandemic, the same system acquisition values were considered, but the 2019 tariffs had low values, the state taxes also had minor changes, as well as higher values in the rates of financing that in 2019 the researched credit union applied the CDI + 0.72% per month, in addition to the rate added to the CDI being higher, the CDI was also higher at 0.48% per month. Finally, for economically viable techniques, it is necessary to use a Minimum Attractiveness Rate of Return (MARR). The MARR used by the electricity sector in Brazil is the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), the remuneration rate of regulatory capital used to review the tariff or revenue of electricity distributors, transmission, and generators companies. The method for estimating the WACC is based on national parameters and uses public data sources. The WACC treats the nature of the capital sources used by energy distributors differently, considering that equity is less flexible than third-party capital. Table 1 presents a summary of the data used in the cash flows. The base scenario for the economic feasibility analysis uses the elec- their rates changed to 1.65% and 7.6%, respectively, and calculated on a "non-cumulative" basis, that is, the new rates are based on a net calculation basis, with the total gross revenue deducting the costs allowed by law. The changes introduced by these new laws resulted in the removal of PIS and COFINS from the electricity tariff, and both are now reported individually in electricity bills and may vary monthly. Due to monthly variations, a historical average of the rates charged on the electric energy bills of five states was carried out, which resulted in a rate of 5.5%. Thus, for calculating economic feasibility, 5.05% of the rate was standardized for PIS and COFINSs since the effective post-tax tariffs are defined by Equation (1). 18 Fee A search was carried out for the average local irradiance values of the 27 capitals in the SunData-CRESESB database. 19 By obtaining the daily local irradiance of each city, it was possible to calculate the energy generated by the system, considering a residential PV system with 4 kWp, thus applying Equation (2) for the calculation. The value of 98% of inverter efficiency was considered, with annual degradation of 0.7% and total power losses of 18.5%. The actual energy generated by the system is obtained through the application of the percentages in Equation (3). To project the value of electricity tariffs in capitals, besides adding the percentages of state and federal taxes, 7.37% per year was applied, referring to the annual tariff adjustment, based on the historical average increase in the last 10 years of the residential tariff. As the MARR, the WACC rate explained in Section 2.1 was used. The project installation cost, the estimated annual electricity produced, the electricity price per kilowatt-hour, and its inflation rate are the main factors that play a role in the payback period of a PV solar system, 20 as well as the MARR and possible government incentives. 21 However, the payback period is not enough to provide insight from the investor's point of view because the payback period does not consider maintenance costs, inflation, depreciation, and the project lifetime. 22 Therefore, to increase the cost-effectiveness and measure the project's profitability, the net present value (NPV) and the internal rate of return (IRR) were calculated. Developers can compare their discount rate with the IRR to determine whether a system would be a financially attractive investment . 23 The IRR is the discount rate at which the NPV of all cash flows is zero. It can be calculated from Equation (4) 23 : where, I is the initial investment, the total price The NPV, presented in Equation (5), is the indicator that calculates the present value of a series of future financial movements, discounted at the MARR, considering the investment and revenues and costs over time. 24 NPV ¼ Therefore, consumers tend to wait for a more optimistic scenario, waiting to see how electricity prices, government incentives, and solar technology will evolve before deciding to invest. It implies that, compared to investments whose returns are subject to less uncertainty, consumers may demand a higher rate of return on their PV energy investments. The following variables were changed that affect the result to calculate the IRR and NPV in Brazilian capitals: electricity tariff, generated energy, annual radiation, ICMS. Each of these variables is directly related to the result, and all depend on the location. Before Brazilians faced the pandemic, the feasibility calculation used Among the financial engineering techniques used for the analysis, DP is the value of most significant interest to investors for decision making. That said, Figure 1 shows the DP values, in years, for each Brazilian capital and the spot scenario (on the left) and the split scenario (on the right). The DP is faster in the cash system investment for all capitals except Rio de Janeiro. On average, the DP for the cash system is 4.71 years, and for the financed system, it is 5.59 years. Curitiba (PR), São Paulo (SP) and Macapá (AP) had the highest DP times for both scenarios. The first two are due to the irradiance levels in these capitals. SP is known for the "land of the drizzle" and has a lower solar potential. Macapá, on the other hand, is due to its electricity tariff being the lowest in the country. The DP means of the cash values for the financed values are statistically different (paired t-test, p-value = 0.009). The capital of Rio de Janeiro has the lowest DP as its electricity tariff is the highest in the country. The tariff is raised mainly by the share of "commercial losses," where fraud and electricity theft raise the tariff for all consumer units in the capital. Therefore, the consumer who installs a PV system under the distributed modality does not pay for electricity, fraud, or theft. As the monthly return on investment in the PV system is greater than the interest payment of the financed system, the financed investment was more attractive. The feasibility analysis was favorable in both investment models The main difference between the investment period before COVID- This increase in electricity tariffs in 2020 is mainly due to the noncharging of tariff flags from May to December 2020, which generated a billionaire loss. Not charging the yellow flag (the period using thermoelectric plants) had been a policy to support consumers during the pandemic crisis. Forecasts indicate that Brazil's electricity system will continue to be pressured by higher costs until 2022 due to the impacts of the worst rainy season in two decades on the production of hydroelectric plants, the primary source of energy generation in the country. The lack of rain leads to a sharp drop in the volume of water stored in the reservoirs of these hydroelectric plants, causing the government to create ways to save water from these reservoirs and reduce energy production by the hydroelectric plants. 25 It is necessary to activate the thermoelectric plants to compensate and meet the energy demand. 26 Brazil experienced an electricity crisis in 2013-2015, with some blackouts, a high risk of not having enough supply to meet demand, and skyrocketing electricity prices. As hydroelectric power generation accounts for more than 80% of generation, the lack of water in reservoirs can lead to an intense crisis in the sector. 27 The energy genera- The scenario is promising in terms of investment in the PV system because two reasons. At first, due to the financial return, that becomes more attractive than investing in the PV system due to the increase in the electricity bill resulting from the change in tariff flags that tend to stay between yellow and red due to the thermoelectric plants' activation. In the second stage, the increase in energy generation by the final consumer will alleviate the need for the generation coming from large plants when analyzed on a large scale. The scenario motivates consumer investment to achieve a balance between generation and consumption of electricity in the country. However, the fast growth of PV solar energy through DG has led ANEEL to revise the Electricity Offset System to balance grid costs for DG participants and non-participants. In addition, the insertion of DG in the Brazilian electricity grid worried electricity concessionaires and their monopoly. They faced the prospect that customers will reduce their electricity purchases as they adopt solar PV generation and enter a positive feedback loop (death spiral). 29 Because with the regulatory review, the payback time for investors increases. One study points to a 50% increase in turnaround time for applying ANEEL's alternative 5, the worst-case scenario. 31 This fact can lead the market to a cycle of expansion and contraction, requiring a high installation volume before the end of the incentive and a high contraction after the end of the incentive. Therefore, Brazil may be going through a moment of high expansion for the future high contraction. Even with the continuity of economic viability, the increase in the return on investment may force some investors to decide not to install a PV system of the DG modality. PV energy in Brazil is still at an early stage of development. However, the country has shown its interest in disseminating this technology, constantly changing its regulations in search of better conditions and aiming to diversify the Brazilian electricity mix. This study helps potential residential investors identify the economic feasibility of installing a PV system in each Brazilian capital in a moment of economic uncertainty due to the coronavirus pandemic. This study presented a satisfactory economic evaluation for four scenarios, and in all the configurations presented, the results were viable. A constant observed is that, due to the effects of the pandemic, the financing rates present decreases, making the financeable system more attractive than the cash system in most capitals. It would be advisable to buy a financed PV system in these capitals and use the cash value in other possible investments. This attractiveness is also reinforced by the low risk involved in this type of investment, as there is legal certainty guaranteed by a regulation considered consolidated and in constant evolution, which makes it even more vital. It is noteworthy that the variables used in the calculations may be different for other regions of the country and, therefore, the results are specific for the systems studied in the capitals. This study confirms to policymakers that the incentives proposed by the government are being of great value and, currently, all Brazilian capitals are already economically viable in the implementation of PV systems in residential sectors. A difficulty to be overcome in DG is the attitude of energy distributors, who manage the entire process of grid-connection, a bureaucratic and timeconsuming administrative process. While it is bureaucratic, it is also essential to maintain the security and quality of the network. ANEEL needs to create mechanisms to evaluate both the fulfillment of deadlines by electricity distributors and the quality of service provided by the installers. Policymakers need to know that if the amendment proposed by ANEEL is approved, the attractiveness of the DG for residential purposes will be reduced. Brazil was affected by the economic crisis of the coronavirus and, at the same time, by a historic drought, impacting the costs of electricity generation due to dependence on hydroelectric plants. Therefore, a reduction in DG growth is inadequate from the point of view of diversifying the electricity matrix. Greater capacity and diversification of sources for power generation are increasingly important. Even with the proposed changes, the business will still be viable, but with a longer-term return on investment, which discourages investors from seeking financial results in the short term. Every real case must be carefully analyzed and calculated. A comprehensive study of techno-economic and environmental features of different solar tracking systems for residential photovoltaic installations Economic assessment of grid-connected residential solar photovoltaic systems introduced under Romania's new regulation Technical and economical evaluation of the photovoltaic system in Brazilian public buildings: a case study for peak and off-peak hours The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index Photovoltaic electricity production in Brazil: a stochastic economic viability analysis for small systems in the face of net metering and tax incentives Solar photovoltaic distributed generation in Brazil: the case of resolution 482/2012 Governo quer impulsionar desenvolvimento das fontes renováveis em linha com demanda da sociedade. Assoc Bras Energ sol Fotovoltaica Governo zera imposto de importação de equipamentos de energia solar Energia solar gera aos brasileiros 3 vezes mais benefícios do que custos The role of flexibility in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: contributing to a sustainable and resilient energy future in Europe Previsões de carga para a 1 a Revisão Quadrimestral da Carga The influence of COVID-19 on grid parity of China's photovoltaic industry Performance evaluation of large solar photovoltaic power plants in Spain Real-time monitoring and diagnosis of photovoltaic system degradation only using maximum power pointthe Suns-Vmp method Tarifas Residenciais: Efeitos dos Reajustes Tarifários Potencial Solar -SunData v 3.0 Performance and economic viability of the PV system in different climatic zones of Nigeria Economic and risk analysis of small-scale PV systems in Brazil Moving beyond LCOE: impact of various financing methods on PV profitability for SIDS Mapping the geographic distribution of the economic viability of photovoltaic load displacement projects in SW USA Economic viability of business models for photovoltaic solar generation in Brazil: studies of cases Acionada bandeira amarela para o mês de Abril 26/03/2021; 2021 Model for the flexible commercialization of thermoelectric plants in Brazil Thermoelectric dispatch: from utopian planning to reality Levelized cost analysis of thermoelectric generation in Brazil: a comparative economic and policy study with environmental implications Factors for measuring photovoltaic adoption from the perspective of operators Revisão das regras aplicáveis à micro e minigeração distribuída -Resolução Normativa n o 482 Impacto da TUSD na viabilidade econômica de sistemas fotovoltaicos no Brasil The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economic viability of distributed photovoltaic systems in Brazil The authors thank INCTGD, CAPES, CNPq, and FAPERGS for the financial support received for the development of this work. The authors declare no potential conflict of interest. Graciele Rediske: Methodology (equal). Lauren Peres Lorenzoni: Conceptualization (equal). Tiago Bandeira Marchesan: Supervision (equal). Data available on request from the authors.