key: cord-0824932-o4bgcru9
authors: Shah, Khushali; Camhi, Stephanie S.; Sridhar, Jayanth; Cavuoto, Kara M.
title: Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on pediatric eye-related emergency department services
date: 2020-11-02
journal: J AAPOS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.09.001
sha: 6a09d41ee11347293bb9675eace561fcad092253
doc_id: 824932
cord_uid: o4bgcru9

Literature describing the trends and utilization of pediatric eye-related emergency department (ED) visits is limited. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 311 pediatric patients visiting Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI) ED between March and May 2020 to quantify the effect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on ophthalmology care utilization. In our study, pediatric ED visits declined by half at the onset of the pandemic in March. The number of visits reached the lowest point in early April and increased to 48% of the pre-COVID volume by the end of May. Despite changes in volume, patient demographics and clinical diagnoses were relatively consistent throughout the pandemic.

Utilization of emergency departments (ED) by pediatric patients has rapidly increased over the last two decades. 1 Currently, approximately 30 million pediatric ED visits take place annually. 1, 2 The emergence of the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically altered accessibility of medical care, leading to a 42% decline in ED visits nationally. 3 The largest declines in visits have been observed in women, persons aged 14 years and younger, and visits taking place in April. 3 Although this data has helped understand the overall effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ED utilization, data regarding urgent and emergent ophthalmic complaints in children are lacking. In this study, we sought to analyze trends in pediatric eyerelated ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analyzed with the Pearson χ 2 test or the Fischer exact test, as appropriate. Age was compared among diagnosis groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc analysis. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

A total of 311 children (range, 0.04-18 years; 9.73 ± 5.77 years) were seen during the study period. Of these, 154 (49.5%) presented in March, 74 (23.8%) in April, and 83 (26.7%) in May.

Compared to the March visits in 2019, the 2020 volume was lower by only 13 visits. Visit volume in late March 2020 decreased by 51% compared to early March. Visits dropped to the lowest in the study period in early April, at 30% of pre-COVID-19 volume. On relaxation of stay-at-home orders in early May, visits increased slightly, but only to 48% of pre-COVID volume.

The relationship between diagnosis and time period is depicted in Figure 1 . Overall, the presenting diagnosis, age group (0-5, 6-12, 13-18 years), and patient gender did not significantly change over the six time periods (P > 0.05).

Forty-six unique diagnoses were observed, with the leading diagnoses being eye trauma J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f (22.5%), conjunctivitis (18.6%), and chalazion/hordeolum (12.5%). Exploratory analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in diagnosis by age; however, the average age among the leading diagnoses was similar ( Table 1 ). The greatest decreases in the number of visits occurred in children 13-18 years of age (63.2%) and for children diagnosed with chalazion/hordeolum (83.5%), comparing the first and second halves of March. Diagnosis also differed significantly by gender (P = 0.021), with eye trauma diagnosed more frequently in males (70.0%) and chalazion/hordeolum diagnosed more frequently in females (76.9%). Infectious conditions, such as conjunctivitis, were diagnosed equally in males and females.

Our data suggest that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the clinical workflow in our eye-specific ED, as evidenced by a dramatic decline in pediatric visits over a short timeframe. Although COVID-19 was initially regarded as an adult-limited and predominantly respiratory illness, evidence connecting the virus to a Kawasaki-like pediatric multisystemic inflammatory condition, first identified in April, may have fueled parental fears of viral exposure and led to the decline in non-COVID-related ED encounters. 4 On the other hand, parents may have been more likely to present to our ED than to a general ED, because the risk of transmission of a respiratory virus would theoretically be lower given the eye-centered nature of our institution.

Mandated COVID-related lockdowns reached their peak in the latter half of April, leading to a significant drop in visits for the leading diagnosis, eye trauma, in our population.

Several studies have noted the home environment as the most common setting for serious eye injuries in children. 5, 6 The low incidence of eye trauma in our study during this time period may be attributable to children transitioning toward indoor, sedentary activities as school closures and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f cessation of sports/recreational activities limited the risk for acute ocular injuries. Alternatively, this trend may reflect the broader healthcare climate, as public health concerns over contracting COVID-19 intensified the hesitancy to visit the ED. The proportion of visits for eye trauma did increase from 9% to 25% when state-mandated lockdowns ended.

Although our sample demonstrates a decrease in ED volume following the nationwide stay-at-home orders, we uncovered no change in patient demographic characteristics before, during or after mandated COVID-19 lockdowns. Eye trauma occurred predominantly in boys, which may be due to increased tendency to participate in violent or aggressive activities. 7 Chalazion was another main driver of ED visits, and, consistent with published literature, was more prevalent in females. 8, 9 Our results highlight the fact that girls may be at greater risk for development of chalazia due to hormonal/pubertal changes, cosmetic use, and poor eyelid hygiene. 10 Although telemedicine was made available to our patient population, it was used only moderately, even for diagnoses that are typically nonurgent, such as chalazia. This might be due to the ease of access and availability of an ophthalmology-centric ED.

Limitations of this study include the small sample size, short timeframe, and retrospective design. However, we focused on the immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess short-term implications pertaining to pediatric ophthalmology-specific ED visits. Our study may not be generalizable to pediatric ED visits nationally, given geographic differences. It is possible that shorter time frames may elucidate more granular details regarding age and diagnoses. Future to ED visits at BPEI visits did not differ over the course of the study period. Age is presented as mean ± standard deviation. b Statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences in age were observed between the following diagnoses: vision loss vs chemical exposure, corneal ulcer vs chemical exposure, and corneal ulcer vs glaucoma.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey: 2017 Emergency Department Summary Tables

Emergency Department Utilization by Children in the USA

National Syndromic Surveillance Program Community of Practice. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits-United States

Covid-19, Kawasaki disease, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Pediatric eye injury-related hospitalizations in the United States

Patterns of pediatric firearm-related ocular trauma in the United States

Epidemiological findings of ocular trauma in childhood

Epidemiology of benign eyelid lesions in patients presenting to a teaching hospital

Incidence and predisposing factors of chalazion