key: cord-0824316-hg4266q3 authors: Bersanelli, Melissa; Giannarelli, Diana; Leonetti, Alessandro; Buti, Sebastiano; Tiseo, Marcello; Nouvenne, Antonio; Ticinesi, Andrea; Meschi, Tiziana; Procopio, Giuseppe; Danielli, Riccardo title: The right immune-modulation at the right time: thymosin α1 for prevention of severe COVID-19 in cancer patients date: 2021-02-04 journal: Future oncology DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0754 sha: c3d44ed05b1f7735210336770049972ab62ebd59 doc_id: 824316 cord_uid: hg4266q3 We presented the rationale for the use of thymosin α1 as prophylaxis of severe COVID-19 in cancer patients undergoing active treatment, constituting the background for the PROTHYMOS study, a prospective, multicenter, open-label, Phase II randomized study, currently in its start-up phase (Eudract no. 2020-006020-13). We aim to offer new hope for this incurable disease, especially to frail patient population, such as patients with cancer. The hypothesis of an effective prophylactic approach to COVID-19 would have immediate clinical relevance, especially given the lack of curative approaches. Moreover, in the ‘COVID-19 vaccine race era’ both clinical and biological results coming from the PROTHYMOS trials could even support the rationale for future combinatorial approaches, trying to rise vaccine efficacy in frail individuals. often showing bilateral ground glass opacities, and leading to progressive respiratory impairment. The most severe phase of COVID-19, occurring in a minority of patients but unfortunately frequently observed worldwide in the last two months, is represented by the systemic hyperinflammation phase, characterized by a typical cytokine release syndrome. In this late stage, inflammation markers are elevated in the serum of patients, becoming responsible of organ damage and failure and of fibrosis of lung tissue. Beyond the typical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a multiorgan involvement is frequent, with thromboembolic events, myocarditis, renal and hepatic impairment, risk of cardiopulmonary collapse [1] [2] [3] [4] . The therapeutic approach for COVID-19 patients should not disregard this likely reliable timing. Antiviral drugs, potentially effective in the viremic phase (early stage), have recently demonstrated not to provide benefit when used in the later phases of the disease [5] . On the other hand, immunosuppressants like tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 antibody) or the most common corticosteroids (methylprednisolone) have shown a certain benefit, according to recent clinical reports, allowing dominating the cytokine storm that characterizes the late stage of COVID-19 [6] [7] [8] . It is likely that the differential effectiveness of such different therapeutic approaches can be due to an immunological shift occurring between the early and the later stages. The initial phase is probably characterized by impaired immunity, with lymphopenia facilitating the increase of the viral load. Indeed, it was recently reported that T cells are decreased and exhausted in patients with COVID-19 [9] . The onset of the respiratory impairment typically occurs during the immunological shift from defective to aberrant response, when an excessive and dysfunctional host immune response leads to ARDS [1] . In the first stage, anti-viral therapies could be beneficial, and immunosuppression could theoretically be dangerous, as it could delay the development of an adequate adaptive immune response. In this light, postexposition prophylaxis protocols should be investigated with caution and carefully considering the different profiles of the drug. In the second, pulmonary stage, when increasing levels of inflammation (moderate elevation of biomarkers) lead to clinical deterioration and to respiratory impairment, some immunosuppression could be beneficial. Then, in the cytokine storm phase, more aggressive immunomodulatory treatment is probably needed, to control the hyperinflammatory stage. Thymosin α1, is a synthetic version of a naturally occurring 28-amino acid peptide acetylated at its amino terminus. Chemically synthesized Tα1 is identical in amino acid sequence to thymosin α1 isolated from thymosin fraction-5, an extract from the thymus gland, which can be administered with subcutaneous injection. Despite its exact mechanism of action is not known, its effect as pleiotropic biological response modifier and as immune cell modulator has been demonstrated [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] . Thymosin α1 is expected to have clinical benefits in disorders where immune responses are altered. Of note, it can modulate and balance the immune system in different directions, depending on the immunological status of the host. Its effects have been investigated in clinical studies on various inflammatory and viral diseases, including sepsis, bone marrow transplant-related infections and severe acute respiratory syndromes [12] [13] [14] . Thymosin α1 has received marketing approval in close to 40 countries; approved indications include hepatitis B and C, severe sepsis with lymphopenia, vaccine augmentation, adjuvant to chemotherapy or immunotherapy of cancers. The safety and activity of thymosin α1 has been evaluated in both the preclinical and clinical settings. Adverse events have been infrequent and mild, consisting in local discomfort at the injection site and rare instances of erythema, transient muscle atrophy, polyarthralgia with hand edema and rash (<1% drug related adverse events for all indications). No severe adverse events have been reported [16] . Thymosin α1 has also shown promising results in combination with anticancer chemo and immune therapies, and its possible synergistic effect with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was reported [17, 18] . The favorable combination of thymosin α1 with an anti-PD-1 antibody has been already postulated in an experimental setting in which low doses of thymosin α1, while being ineffective alone, increased the efficacy of an anti-PD-1 antibody in the lung metastasis melanoma model [19] . Moreover, several evidence converge in the suggestion that thymosin α1 represents a plausible candidate to improve the safety and the efficacy profile of ICI [20] , and, in particular, a preclinical study has shown the protective role of thymosin α1 from intestinal toxicity in a murine model of ICI-induced colitis [21] . The rationale for the use of thymosin α1 in cancer patients was based on the capabilities to enhance immune response, prevent opportunistic infection and counteract the immunosuppressive side effects associated with conventional therapies. Moreover, immune evaluations revealed beneficial effects of thymosin α1 on NK cell activity and CD4 + cell number after the suppression induced by chemotherapy [17] . Eventually, it has also been used in infections, improving outcomes of pulmonary cytomegalovirus in renal transplanted patients and in recipients of haploidentical stem cell transplants for hematologic malignancies [12, 22] . Its use was associated with increased T-cell counts and earlier appearance of functional pathogen-specific T-cell responses. Thymosin α1 monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B was effective in suppressing viral replication compared with untreated control or to interferon, as suggested by a meta-analysis of randomized studies (353 patients) showing that, compared with no antiviral treatment, thymosin α1 suppressed viral replication in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. The odds ratio of the virological response of thymosin over placebo at the end of treatment, 6 months post-treatment and 12 months post-treatment were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.2-1.52), 1.67 (95% CI: 0.83-3.37) and 2.67 (95% CI: 1.25-5.68), respectively. There was an increasing trend of the virological response with time since the cessation of thymosin treatment (p = 0.02) [23] . Moreover, thymosin α1 has been widely investigated even in severe sepsis [24] . A systematic review of 19 randomized controlled trials showed a reduced mortality in sepsis patients receiving thymosin α1 as compared with control group (relative risk, RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77; p = 0.0001) [25] . Neither serious Tα1 related adverse events nor discontinuation due to tolerability issues have been recorded in such studies. Along this line, large, randomized trials have demonstrated that thymosin α1 enhances the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in immunocompromised patients, reducing the number of cases of influenza and symptoms compared with the vaccine alone, without any safety alerts [26] . Given these previous data, this adjuvant compound might be useful in reducing the required vaccine antigen that may be relevant, if massive vaccination programs are to be undertaken in the case of a pandemic threat. After further nationwide lock-downs to prevent the second spread of the virus, several countries in Europe are moving to the so called 'COVID-19 Phase III', a likely indefinite period during which citizens must learn how to live together with the virus. Along this line, in the next future, the human contacts will progressively increase, and the risk of new outbreaks will never be averted. In this scenario, it is crucial advancing COVID-19 strategies to prevent a new spread of the virus. Currently, more than 90 vaccines are being developed against COVID-19 by research teams in companies and universities worldwide, with the common goal to elicit an immune response against SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing the viral infection. However, the exact immunologic background of COVID-19 is currently under investigation. It has been identified that CD4 + and CD8 + lymphocytes are significantly lower in severe/critical COVID-19 patients [9] . The phenomenon of lymphocytes depletion (PLD) has demonstrated prognostic implications, including sepsis, pneumonia, ARDS and more recently also COVID-19 [9] . Cytokines, such as IL-10, IL-6 and TNF-α have been suggested to be involved in T-cell reduction during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, recent researches demonstrated that surviving T cell during PLD in COVID-19 are functionally exhausted, suggesting that lymphocyte subsets should be analyzed in these patients, in order to early intervene in the negative consequence of PLD and T-cell exhaustion [9, 27, 28] . Along this line, PLD could be one of the main targets of thymosin α1 in the context of COVID-19, improving the prognosis of severe cases or even before hindering the progression from the viral phase to the severe inflammation stage. Recent data suggest that early adaptive immune responses might correlate with better clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients [29] . Thymosin α1 could trigger the adaptive immune response, directly enhancing the recognition of infected cells and modulating T-cells activity. Moreover, it can stimulate both innate and adaptive immunity to clear virus and other nonself agents [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] . Along with the basic research data, several clinical studies in very different areas, such as sepsis and cancer have indicated thymosin α1 could improve the imbalance of IFN-γ and IL-4 ratio in CD4 + T cell and adjust the immune state [24, 38] . The pleiotropic function of thymosin α1 on the immune system allows different immunomodulating effects depending on the immunological status of the recipient, a feature that could be extremely valuable in the context of COVID-19 [38] . Indeed, as already described in the first paragraph, the clinical course of the disease seems characterized both by immune disfunction/exhaustion and by paradoxical immune-hyperactivation (cytokine storm), with possibly unpredictable and very rapid switch from an initial phase of immunosuppressed status and a subsequent uncontrolled inflammatory reaction, characterizing the pathogenesis of the pulmonary damage [1] . The pleiotropic actions of thymosin α1 could effectively buffer the pathogenetic mechanisms of different phases, especially if combined with trivial immunosuppressant, such as corticosteroids, in the late stage of COVID-19. Another element supports the possible role of thymosin α1 in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity. Indeed, its maintained production in the functional thymus of children may be responsible for their decreased susceptibility to COVID-19 [39] . The other way around, the severity of the disease among the elderly patients may be favored by the dramatic thymic involution, which has already been suggested as possibly responsible for the age-associated failure of the adaptive immune system [40] . This immunological background suggests the possible use of thymosin α1 in clinical trials for preventing COVID-19 severe evolution, as prophylaxis for SARS-CoV-2 infection, or as adjuvant for the vaccines currently undergoing experimental development. Recently, a retrospective case series of 76 patients with severe COVID-19 was reported [41] : 36 were treated with thymosin α1, showing a significantly reduced mortality compared with 40 COVID-19 patients not receiving this treatment (mortality 11 vs 30%, respectively; p = 0.044). COVID-19 patients with low lymphocyte count gained more benefits from the drug, even in aged patients. Moreover, the authors showed that thymosin α1 significantly enhances T-cell counts in COVID-19 patients with severe lymphocytopenia and suggested its ability of reversing T-cell exhaustion, recovering immune reconstitution through promoting thymus output during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indeed, they showed that thymosin α1 effectively downregulates both PD 1 and Tim 3 on CD8 + T cells in COVID-19 patients [41] . Subsequent evidence, even stronger, came from a multicenter retrospective analysis of 334 COVID-19 patients enrolled to receive thymosin α1 for 5 days or more from December 2019 to March 2020 [42] . The primary outcomes measured were the 28-and 60-day mortality; the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and the total duration of the disease. The 28-day mortality between the thymosin α1 and nonthymosin α1-treated groups was significantly different in adjusted model (p = 0.016). According to the subgroup analysis, thymosin α1 therapy significantly reduced 28-day mortality (hazard ratio, HR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02-0.63; p = 0.013) by improving Pa0 2 /FiO 2 ratio (p = 0.036) and prolonged the hospital length of stay (p = 0.024) as well as the total duration of the disease (p = 0.001) in the critical type patients (who were defined by age, blood parameters, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) [42] . As an immunomodulatory agent, thymosin α1 has several features rendering this drug a potential optimal candidate for a prophylactic approach to COVID-19 evolution. First, it is very well-tolerated, and any drug-drug interaction has never been reported, even in the case of anticancer drugs, to which have been associated in several trials as immune adjuvant. Second, its pleiotropic function allows different immunomodulating effects depending on the immunological status of the recipient, a feature that could be crucial in the context of COVID-19. The peculiar ability of thymosin α1 to restore immune system homeostasis, renders this drug potentially able to contrast the etiopathogenesis of the damage, thus preventing the COVID-19 progression from the viremic phase to the more severe stages, as we represented in Figure 1 . With the premises described above, we hypothesized the effectiveness of a prophylactic intervention with thymosin α1 in reducing the critical evolution COVID-19 number in high risk populations, preventing hospitalization and death from SARS-CoV-2 infection, reducing the development and the severity of COVID-19 complications. Such experimental application would be warranted among particularly frail population of individuals (such as elderly and cancer patients), especially in the light of the current drop in new infections. Among the frailest patient categories, cancer patients are both at high risk of exposure and of lethal complications. Recent studies demonstrated that patients affected by cancer might have a higher risk of COVID-19, and showed poorer outcomes, than individuals without cancer [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] . A prophylactic approach would be warranted for these frail patients during the 'Phase III', in order to reduce the critical evolution of COVID-19, preventing hospitalization and death, minimizing the anticancer treatment discontinuation rate and consequently improving the oncological outcome. On the bases described above, we have designed the PROTHYMOS trial, a multicenter, open-label, Phase II randomized study (Eudract no. 2020-006020-13), with the primary objective of evaluating the efficacy of thymosin α1 as prophylaxis of serious COVID-19, defined as COVID-related hospitalization or death, in cancer patients undergoing active treatment (including neoadjuvant, adjuvant and advanced settings, with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy). The prophylaxis impact against COVID-19, as the primary objective of the study, will be evaluated in terms of incidence of serious COVID-19 within 8 weeks from randomization, comparing the experimental Arm versus the control Arm, as the primary end point. Cancer patients represent a large subgroup at high risk of developing coronavirus infection and its severe complications. While other chronic disease can be followed at home, with phone assistance and with the aid of the general practitioner, anticancer treatments often require high intensity of care, with frequent hospital access and a great number of clinical controls, blood and radiological testing and physical examinations. As a consequence, cancer patients are at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion. In addition, given their likely impaired immunological status, due to the oncological disease and exposure to immunosuppressant treatments (such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy), they are at high risk of severe consequences from COVID-19. Thus, the primary objective of this study is preventing hospitalization and death from SARS-COV-2 infection, and the secondary aim is minimizing the anticancer treatment discontinuation rate in cancer patients due to COVID-19, consequently improving their outcome. In order to prioritize the health interventions postponed during the emergency, constructing actions for the improvement of the postemergency management of frail patients, the specific secondary objectives are represented by the compliance to anticancer therapy, by the dose-intensity maintenance, by the evaluation of the hematologic toxicity of the anticancer treatment (especially leukopenia and lymphopenia). The secondary end points that will be specifically investigated are represented by the anticancer therapy discontinuation rate, the dose reduction/delay rate, the incidence of hematologic toxicity (especially in terms of leukopenia and lymphopenia) and the rate of adverse events. Among cancer patients with advanced disease, representing the majority of the oncological patient population, the secondary aim of the study will be represented by the evaluation of possible benefit from thymosin α1 adjuvant use also in terms of improving the patient outcome. The outcome of interest, considered for the patient subgroup with metastatic/advanced disease (constituting the majority of cancer patients at our institutions), will be investigated in terms of anticancer treatment safety, objective response rate, progression-free survival, time to anticancer-treatment failure and cancer-specific overall survival. The hypothesis of an effective prophylactic approach to COVID-19 would have immediate clinical relevance, especially given the lack of curative approaches for the disease. Moreover, in the 'COVID-19 vaccine race era' both clinical and biological results coming from the PROTHYMOS trials could even support the rationale for future combinatorial approaches trying to raise vaccine efficacy in frail individuals. The expected impact on the public health is due to the reduction of deaths and hospitalizations from COVID-19, allowing savings healthcare resources, especially targeting the intervention in a frail population, as cancer patients, often requiring hospitalization in case of COVID-19 infection, due to their high risk of complications. Moreover, an effective secondary prevention of COVID-19 morbidity and lethality among cancer patients would reduce the heavy impact of the pandemic on the curability of oncological diseases, recently penalized in terms of health resources and at risk to be burdened by diagnostic and treatment delays in the endemic areas. • COVID-19 is characterized by different stages from the viremic phase to the cytokine storm. • The first phase is probably allowed by immune suppression, while the late stage is often characterized by paradoxical excess of immune activation, with a cytokine storm. • Thymosin α1 is an immune-modulating agent drug with pleiotropic properties. • Thymosin α1 might have the ability to positively modulate the immune response in the viremic phase of COVID-19, avoiding progression into cytokine storm. • Prior experience suggested that the combination of thymosin α1 with anticancer therapies may improve the safety and the efficacy outcomes. • In the context of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, thymosin α1 could be investigated as prophylaxis of severe COVID-19 in cancer patients undergoing active therapy. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed States: a clinical-therapeutic staging proposal Severe acute respiratory syndrome: historical, epidemiologic, and clinical features Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 coronavirus in Wuhan China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19 clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19 Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab Tocilizumab treatment in severe COVID-1 19 patients attenuates the inflammatory storm incited by monocyte centric immune interactions revealed by single-cell analysis Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Thymosin α1 as a stimulatory agent of innate cell-mediated immune response Immune modulation with thymosin alpha 1 treatment Immunoregulation of thymosin α1 treatment of cytomegalovirus infection accompanied with acute respiratory distress syndrome after renal transplantation An aggressive systematic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe pneumonia after renal transplantation The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Thymosin α1 potentiates the release by CD8+ cells of soluble factors able to inhibit HIV-1 and human T lymphotropic virus 1 infection in vitro Summary of product characteristics Large randomized study of thymosin alpha 1, interferon alfa, or both in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma Long-term follow up of metastatic melanoma patients treated with thymosin alpha-1: investigating immune checkpoints synergy Evaluation of thymosin alpha 1 in nonclinical models of the immune-suppressing indications melanoma and sepsis A reappraisal of thymosin alpha1 in cancer therapy Thymosin alpha1 protects from CTLA-4 intestinal immunopathology The role of Tα1 on the infective patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation The efficacy of thymosin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a meta-analysis The efficacy of thymosin alpha 1 for severe sepsis (ETASS): a multicenter, single-blind, randomized and controlled trial Thymosin alpha-1 treatment for patients with sepsis Augmentation of influenza antibody response in elderly men by thymosin alpha one. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID-19 pneumonia Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19 Thymosin-alpha1 regulates MHC class I expression in FRTL-5 cells at transcriptional level Thymosin alpha 1 activates dendritic cells for antifungal Th1 resistance through toll-like receptor signaling Thymosin α1 and cancer: action on immune effector and tumor target cells Thymosin-α1 stimulates maturation of CD34 + stem cells into CD3 + 4 + cells in an in vitro thymic epithelia organ coculture model IRX-2 and thymosin alpha1 (Zadaxin) increase T lymphocytes in T lymphocytopenic mice and humans Thymosin-alpha1 modulates dendritic cell differentiation and functional maturation from human peripheral blood CD14 + monocytes Effects of thymic polypeptides on the thymopoiesis of mouse embryonic stem cells Dual effect of thymosin α 1 on human monocyte-derived dendritic cell in vitro stimulated with viral and bacterial toll-like receptor agonists Jack of all trades: thymosin α1 and its pleiotropy Possible causes for decreased susceptibility of children to coronavirus Naïve T cell maintenance and function in human aging Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) reduces the mortality of severe COVID-19 by restoration of lymphocytopenia and reversion of exhausted T cells Thymosin α1 therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter retrospective cohort study Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China Risk of COVID-19 for cancer patients Do patients with cancer have a poorer prognosis of COVID-19? An experience in New York City Clinical impact of COVID-19 in a single-center cohort of a prospective study in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy Patients with cancer appear more vulnerable to SARS-COV-2: a multi-center study during the COVID-19 outbreak The authors acknowledged SciClone Pharmaceuticals for promoting and sponsoring the PROTHYMOS project. The PROTHYMOS trial will be funded by SciClone Pharmaceuticals. M Bersanelli and R Danielli are the scientific coordinators of the PROTHYMOS trial, which is promoted and sponsored by SciClone, and they received fees as consultants for this role. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.