key: cord-0824264-8yud5o6c authors: Wang, Gary X.; Chou, Shinn-Huey S.; Lamb, Leslie R.; Narayan, Anand K.; Dontchos, Brian N.; Lehman, Constance D.; Miles, Randy C. title: Opportunities for Radiology Trainee Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from an Academic Breast Imaging Program date: 2020-10-03 journal: Acad Radiol DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.009 sha: 87df7d2fe61c277682eca19cbc08182b5629141a doc_id: 824264 cord_uid: 8yud5o6c The COVID-19 pandemic required restructuring of Radiology trainee education across US institutions. While reduced clinical imaging volume and mandates to maintain physical distancing presented new challenges to traditional medical education during this period, new opportunities developed to support our division in providing high-quality training for residents and fellows. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies for Diagnostic Radiology helped guide division leadership in restructuring and reframing breast imaging education during this time of drastic change and persistent uncertainty. Here, we reflect on the educational challenges and opportunities faced by our academic breast imaging division during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic across each of the ACGME Core Competencies. We also discuss how systems and processes developed out of necessity during the first peak of the pandemic may continue to support radiology training during phased reopening and beyond. Challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic required restructuring of radiology training programs across US institutions. 1, 2 Medical training has traditionally relied on experiential learning gained through the performance of clinical work under attending supervision. While reduced clinical imaging volume and mandates to maintain physical distancing have presented challenges to traditional medical education, opportunities have arisen to develop new methods for effective training based on existing educational frameworks. 1 During the height of the pandemic, the American College of Radiology and American Society of Breast Surgeons recommended nationwide deferment of mammography screening examinations. 3 Weekly mammography volumes decreased by over 90% nationwide compared to pre-COVID levels. 4, 5 Consequently, the same spectrum of educational challenges broadly confronted by all radiology training programs were not only present but magnified for breast imaging. In turn, an understanding of the challenges, solutions, and opportunities encountered in breast imaging training may serve as a useful case study for radiology educators from all subspecialities. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies for Diagnostic Radiology can help guide educators in restructuring and reframing radiology training during this time of ongoing change and uncertainty. (Table 1) 6 Here, we reflect upon educational challenges and opportunities faced by our program during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may serve as a case study for programs from all subspecialites. This discussion will be structured using the ACGME Core Competencies framework to better help educators extend and adapt lessons learned to their own programs. We will explore in detail the challenges and opportunities for continued growth across the Core Comptency domains ( Table 2 ). We will also discuss how systems and processes developed out of necessity during the first peak of the pandemic may continue to support radiology training during phased reopening and beyond. This core competency covers patient safety, quality assurance and improvement, and patient care coordination. The development and implementation of unprecedented measures to mitigate risk and maintain healthcare system capacity in the face of the pandemic provided our fellows with invaluable lessons, as they were central in implementation of risk mitigation measures. Prior to the pandemic, our division readily accommodated five fellows and up to four residents. Fellows and residents were assigned to a primary role each day including: screening mammography, diagnostic clinic (mammography/ultrasound), MRI, biopsy/aspiration, needle localization, and second opinion consultation on outside facility imaging. Trainees interpreted imaging studies, performed ultrasound examinations, drafted preliminary reports, and performed mammogram-, ultrasound-, and MRI-guided procedures under attending supervision. Readouts, attending review of cases after trainee evaluation, were performed in person with the attending and trainee seated next to each other. Starting in March 2020, when the first cases of COVID-19 were identified in our state, clinical schedules were promptly modified in response to deferment of screening mammography and MRI examinations to respond to risk mitigation measures and declining volumes. In support of institutional guidelines to limit in-hospital personnel to those essential for clinical care, one attending and fellow were each assigned to work on-site each day. A reserve attending and fellow staff were also assigned each day, who could also cover clinical duties based on changes in clinical volumes until the peak of the pandemic. A step-wise process of incrementally increasing attending and fellow coverage was then enacted, as volumes began to increase following the peak of the pandemic. To support risk mitigation measures in the setting of low clinical volumes, residents previously scheduled for breast imaging rotations were placed into a residency-wide pool of offsite residents from March to June. These residents were taught through a comprehensive virtual curriculum covering topics across radiology managed by the residency leadership. While all senior residents had already fulfilled ACGME breast imaging requirements prior to implementation of the virtual curriculum, the schedule for the next academic year (2020-2021) was constructed to ensure remaining junior residents fulfilled their required 12 weeks of clinical breast imaging rotations prior to graduation. To support physical distancing measures, the on-site fellow and attending were separated into different reading rooms and used telecommunication tools to review imaging together. Telecommunication tools were also used to navigate patients throughout the clinic, while communicating with technologists and administrative staff. Use of these resources also helped to eliminate the need to transfer paperwork between patients, physicians, and ancillary staff for all phases of care. Fellows participated in the implementation of new clinical workflows designed to limit the number of personnel present for hand-held ultrasound exams and procedures to the absolute minimum necessary. For example, ultrasound-guided procedures previously involved a technologist operating the ultrasound unit, while the fellow performed the procedure under direct attending supervision. This was adjusted to require only the presence of a fellow and an attending. These workflows were efficient and feasible during our fellows last quarter of training before proceeding to independent practice. When communicating results or reviewing procedural issues in person, only one provider was present to further support risk mitigation measures. Same day care was instituted for all examinations. Biopsies and aspirations were performed on the same day as diagnostic imaging visits whenever possible to minimize the number of times patients traveled to the hospital. Similarly, we collaborated with our surgical oncology colleagues to ensure patients who might benefit from a surgical consultation, including those with highly suspicious findings for malignancy, were evaluated by a breast surgeon on the same day as the imaging visit. Our fellows were central in implementing these processes and coordinating patient care. Finally, fellows gained experience through taking part in broader risk mitigation processes, including universal use of personal protective equipment and performance of mandatory daily COVID-19 symptom attestations for on-site work. Prior to the pandemic, all fellows participated in daily team huddles held in the diagnostic imaging clinic at 8:00 AM, which were attended in-person by all in-house personnel that day including assistants, technologists, and practice managers. During this huddle, the team reviewed assigned clinical roles, diagnostic imaging and procedure schedules, and updates which may impact clinical workflow. To support physical distancing during the pandemic, this in-person daily huddle adopted a virtual format with a group videoconference at 8:00 AM. These huddles assumed even greater importance, as they provided an opportunity to review and reinforce risk mitigation processes within the division and at the departmental and institutional level. Off-site fellows and attendings joined virtually, to stay informed of daily clinical volumes, case types amid the pandemic, and important updates pertaining to divisional changes. Over this period, fellows learned to prioritize, facilitate, and coordinate patient care via clear and effective telecommunication with their peers, attending radiologists, and technologists. With all parties using facemasks, fellows continued to hone their verbal communication skills by conveying results and recommendations to patients in an empathetic and comprehensible manner. Role modeling of effective telecommunication by attending radiologists, as well as clear and frequent constructive feedback to trainees, also aided in enhancing trainees' interpersonal and communication skills. Growth along this competency was heavily impacted by decreased volumes. As a result, only one to two fellows worked on-site every day amid the peak period of the pandemic. Although off-site fellows could not directly participate in patient care, technological solutions were used to maximize their exposure to clinical cases and create a "remote" clinical learning environment. Through use of our institutional VPN and application virtualization tools, off-site fellows could access our picture archiving and communication system (PACS), mammography information system, and electronic health record to review clinical cases encountered each day. Fellows also had the opportunity to receive 4K ultra-high definition monitors from our department to supplement home workstations. Monitors were used to review mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI images for educational purposes. These monitors also allow off-site fellows to observe and participate in multidisciplinary conferences. Interpretation from home workstations for clinical purposes was not performed since this would require workstations to meet mammography practice parameters, including testing by a medical physicist prior to clinical use 7 . To support continued training in screening mammography for our fellows, worklists on our PACS were created containing screening mammograms previously finalized over one year ago for fellows to interpret using clinical workstations when on-site. Fellows were able to interpret studies blinded to final outcomes, simulating the experience of a real-world clinical setting and helping to augment the clinical volume. Fellows were responsible for comparing their own personal assessment with the true clinical outcome, with on-site attending staff readily available to answer questions and discuss specific cases. This learning opportunity was also provided to residents, who could read screening exams from remote work stations. To maximize exposure to clinical cases for off-site fellows, the division continued daily 4:00 PM videoconferences, which were attended by all attendings and fellows. The on-site fellow led the conference under the supervision of the on-site attending. Teaching points encountered over the course of the clinical day were presented. Radiology-pathology concordance was then discussed for biopsy results completed each day. During these conferences, fellows reviewed clinical history, diagnostic work-up, biopsy images using PACS, and pathology results. Radiology-pathology concordance was established through staff consensus. Discussions focused on the rationale behind steps in management of complex cases, biopsy approaches (modality and techniques), and alternative options for technically challenging cases. Time was allotted for fellows to ask questions about the diagnostic pathway and clinical management decision steps for each case. As previously mentioned, we minimized the number of personnel present in the room during procedures. The attending radiologist generally assumed operation of the ultrasound machine, while directly supervising the fellow during ultrasound procedures. This new workflow helped promote greater confidence and independent in decision making, and aided in strengthening procedural competence. Continued advancement of our fellows within this core competency was supported by a redesigned virtual didactic conference schedule (Table 3 ). Prior to embarking on this new academic calendar, technological support was provided to all attendings and fellows to ensure the successful use of videoconference tools for these virtual conferences. Previously scheduled weekly, hour-long faculty-led educational conferences on Thursday afternoons continued. Guest lecturers were invited from related specialties including genetics, breast surgery, and medical oncology to provide additional learning opportunities. Fellows also presented on breast cancer related topics and led journal clubs to support peer-to-peer teaching and to promote self-learning while working remotely. In addition, the daily afternoon radiologypathology conference provided off-site fellows with continued exposure to clinically encountered cases, while also serving as informal didactic sessions. Finally, all fellows could attend virtual multidisciplinary breast oncology clinics (which review patients with new cancer diagnoses) and breast oncology tumor board (which reviews patients with known cancer facing complex management questions), attended by breast surgery, breast oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, and breast imaging services. Prior to the pandemic, only the fellow assigned to tumor board would be present to derive learning points from these sessions. Switching to a videoconference format provided accessibility for all fellows including those working off-site. Finally, breast imaging, faculty-led virtual resident educational lectures were also accessible via videoconferencing for our fellows. Remote-work solutions allowed fellows to continue their work on quality improvement and research projects. During the peak months, fellows were provided the opportunity to prepare manuscripts for their accepted abstracts to annual conferences that had been canceled due to the pandemic. A centralized fellows' educational folder and reference library was created for educational presentations, in addition to journal club and research articles. As part of the residency-wide virtual education curriculum for off-site residents, attending physicians within the breast imaging division held live videoconference-based hourlong lectures on a weekly basis. A web-based mammography learning program developed by faculty within our division, was made available for residents to support remote learning. The program consisted of 35 case-based learning modules. Each case module began with standard screening mammography images that trainees could interpret, answer case-based questions, and determine next steps in management. Answers were provided to trainees immediately following completion of each module. Scores were automatically stored and sent to educational leadership, which could be used to guide targeted feedback Fellows continued to progress within this domain through continued participation in clinical work. In particular, temporary suspension of nonessential elective procedures during the pandemic necessitated alternative management approaches to breast cancer treatment. Through their continued participation in daily multidisciplinary oncology conferences via videoconferencing, our fellows participated in complex decision-making processes involved in delivering appropriate cancer care during this period. Furthmore, the process of adapting to rapid changes in clinical workflow and maintaining high-quality care delivery amid ongoing uncertainty, created new opportunities for self-reflection and insight into one's strengths and limitations. At its highest level, professionalism means identifying and addressing barriers to ethical care, taking ownership of healthcare system outcomes, and meeting high professional expectations. At our institution, as in others across the country and around the world, models of professional behavior in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have been abundant. The fellows' consistent participation in weekly divisional planning meetings, as well as department/institution-wide town hall forums, allowed them to contribute to implementation of safe, high quality, and equitable care during a period of system-wide stress and uncertainty. The hospital and department provided resources to support emotional and physical health, with webinars and informational resources addressing topics ranging from managing parental challenges, particularly with regard to childhood education, to exercising in the era of COVID-19. Virtual group yoga, strength training, and home cooking session were also provided. These webinars and informational resources were made available for access at any time on hospital and departmental wellness websites, and the availability of these resources were widely broadcasted through daily and weekly emails. In addition, resources to support mental health during this period were widely distributed to all trainees. Educational leadership within the division also scheduled regular check-in meetings and were readily available for discussions with the fellows, both collectively and individually, to help manage trainee anxiety and concerns. As we reflect on the changes that occurred within our academic breast imaging program during the height of the pandemic, it became apparent that new opportunities have arisen to support the continued growth of our trainees largely through maximizing the use of remote work and communications tools. The shift of multidisciplinary oncology conferences to a virtual format has expanded access of these rich learning opportunities to all fellows. In addition, the creation of fellow-led, peer-to-peer educational conferences have provided the chance for fellows to improve their teaching skills and allowed the division to include trainees both on-and offservice. Through our phased reopening, these processes will be continued with incoming fellowship and resident classes, who have returned to on-site clinical rotations. Simulated screening mammography worklists are still being used to support clinical education for all trainees. Continued risk mitigation practices including paperless clinical workflow and same day care have helped our division to optimize our care delivery process, demonstrating to trainees innovative methods on how to improve patient care and workflow efficiency. Finally, videoconferencing capabilities have also helped to support social and wellness activities, in addition to educational, clinical, and research activities. Many of these changes will continue indefinitely, which will benefit trainees for years to come. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Radiology Education-Strategies for Survival The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Trainees ASBrS and ACR Joint Statement on Breast Screening Exams During the COVID-19 Pandemic Preventive Cancer Screenings during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Imaging Case Volumes The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ACR-AAPM-SIIM Practice Parameter for Determinants of Image Quality in Digital Mammography