key: cord-0822839-kpaicxkm
authors: Kasloff, Samantha B.; Leung, Anders; Strong, James E.; Funk, Duane; Cutts, Todd
title: Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on critical personal protective equipment
date: 2021-01-13
journal: Sci Rep
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80098-3
sha: cfb46be8f52805bef1038a129627f98e5f667971
doc_id: 822839
cord_uid: kpaicxkm

The spread of COVID-19 in healthcare settings is concerning, with healthcare workers representing a disproportionately high percentage of confirmed cases. Although SARS-CoV-2 virus has been found to persist on surfaces for a number of days, the extent and duration of fomites as a mode of transmission, particularly in healthcare settings, has not been fully characterized. To shed light on this critical matter, the present study provides the first comprehensive assessment of SARS-CoV-2 stability on experimentally contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE) widely used by healthcare workers and the general public. Persistence of viable virus was monitored over 21 days on eight different materials, including nitrile medical examination gloves, reinforced chemical resistant gloves, N-95 and N-100 particulate respirator masks, Tyvek, plastic, cotton, and stainless steel. Unlike previous reports, viable SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of a soil load persisted for up to 21 days on experimentally inoculated PPE, including materials from filtering facepiece respirators (N-95 and N-100 masks) and a plastic visor. Conversely, when applied to 100% cotton fabric, the virus underwent rapid degradation and became undetectable by TCID(50) assay within 24 h. These findings underline the importance of appropriate handling of contaminated PPE during and following use in high-risk settings and provide interesting insight into the potential utility of cotton in limiting COVID-19 transmission.

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Test surfaces. Eight materials, representing a range of environmental surfaces commonly encountered in healthcare facilities with a particular focus on personal protective equipment were included in this study. These included nitrile medical examination gloves, reinforced chemical resistant gloves, N-95 and N-100 particulate respirator masks, Tyvek coveralls, plastic from face shields, heavy cotton, and stainless steel (Table 1) . Pre-cut, 1 cm 2 stainless steel coupons were obtained directly from the manufacturer and sterilized as previously described 8 . Coupons of all other experimental materials were cut onsite to 1.4 cm 2 and sterilized by 2 Mrads of gamma radiation prior to use.

LogTCID 50 /mL) prepared in a tripartite soil load as per ASTM standard 9 containing mucin (Sigma #M3895), bovine serum albumin (Sigma #A1933) and tryptone (Sigma #T7293) to represent the organic components of typical virus-containing fluids shed by infected individuals 10 . Ten microliters of the resulting virus suspension were added via positive displacement pipette to the center of each coupon and left to air dry in a biosafety cabinet for 1 h. Once dry, coupons were placed in a vented plastic container and stored in a closed cabinet at ambient temperature for the duration of the study. Daily recordings of temperature and humidity at 12-h intervals were monitored with a Professional Thermo-Hygrometer with data logger (TFA Dostmann Product#30.3039.IT).

Three biological replicates (N = 3) of each test material were sampled at the following time points post inoculation: T = 1 h (point of drying), 4 h, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14 and 21 days. Two additional short-course studies on cotton were also included, using the same inoculation and sampling regime up to 3 dpi. Virus was recovered by elution of each coupon in 1 mL of culture medium (DMEM + 2% FBS + 1% Pen-Strep) with rigorous and repeated pipetting. Eluates were immediately tenfold serially diluted for endpoint titration in Vero E6 cells, with remaining volumes of eluates stored at − 80 °C for potential re-processing if required. Samples resulting in low-level cytopathic effect (i.e., in only a single well at neat dilutions) underwent additional sub-passage to confirm the presence of viable virus. Additionally, on the first instance where all biological replicates of a given sample material resulted as negative, supernatants from the neat dilutions of inoculated Vero E6 cells underwent additional sub-passage to ensure capture of potentially low-level virus not visually detected on the first passage. At the completion of the study, the full remaining volume from each day 21 eluate was added to an individual well of a 6-well plate of Vero E6 cells and monitored for cytopathic effect to maximize viable virus detection.

Real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on samples collected at T = 1 h (point of drying), 4 h, and 1, 7, and 14 dpi to confirm successful elution from all surfaces and to assess differences in residual RNA compared to infectious particles. Briefly, supernatants were pooled from the three biological replicates of individual materials harvested at a given time point, and viral RNA was extracted with the Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). The qRT-PCR was run on a LightCycler 96 (Roche, Germany) using the EXPRESS One-Step Superscript RT-qPCR Universal Kit (Invitrogen, USA) with primers and probes targeting the nucleocapsid (NP) gene 11 . Thermal cycling conditions were 50 °C for 15 min for reverse transcription, followed by 95 °C for 20 s and then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s, 60 °C for 30 s. Values are reported as log genome equivalents per mL based on CT values obtained with a standard curve of known concentration plasmid DNA encoding for the target nucleocapsid region.

Statistical analyses. Graphical representations of TCID 50 results, including averages and standard deviations, were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 7) software. Biological replicates with no recoverable virus were assigned a value of zero for the purposes of these calculations.

The environmental persistence of SARS-CoV-2 dried onto surfaces of commonly used PPE and surfaces found in healthcare settings over a period of 21 days revealed dramatic differences in virus stability. By 4 h postdeposition on cotton, infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus was drastically diminished, and no longer quantifiable by 24 h. Conversely, while reduced almost to the limit of detection, SARS-CoV-2 remained viable for up to 21 days 

organic soil load SARS-CoV-2 showed sustained persistence for prolonged periods of time. Viable SARS-CoV-2 was recovered after 21 days on plastic, 14 days on stainless steel, 7 days on nitrile gloves and 4 days on chemical resistant gloves, though at significantly reduced levels compared to the initial inoculum ( Fig. 1 ). Persistence data on stainless steel showed a decrease in viral titre from 5.74 to 4.39 log TICD 50 /ml after a 24 h, representing a > 95% decrease in viable virus. Sampling over a 21-day time course revealed that SARS-CoV-2 remained viable on stainless steel for up to 14 days at ambient conditions, though final titers of 0.7 Log TCID 50 / ml were exponentially lower than starting inoculum (Fig. 1A) . On plastic, a similar reduction in viable virus was observed by 24 h of drying compared to initial inoculum (from 5.74 to 4.5 log TCID 50 /ml). However, virus dried on this surface remained viable through the final sampling point at 21 days post-inoculation (Fig. 1B) .

Two glove types, representing those used in clinical and potential field hospital situations, were also included for analysis. With nitrile gloves, no decrease in viable virus was observed at 4 h post inoculation, though by 24 h a 2-log reduction in viral titer was recorded. At 7 days post-inoculation, low levels of viable virus (mean 1.50 log TCID 50 /ml) remained on all three biological replicates (Fig. 1C ). Conversely, virus applied to the chemical protective gloves showed a 2-log reduction in viability after only a single hour of drying, and a nearly 4-log reduction to 1.58 log TCID 50 /ml by 24 h (Fig. 1D ).

viable SARS-CoV-2 could be recovered from inoculated N-95 (Mask 1) and N-100 (Mask 2) surface materials for up to 21 days. Decay patterns of virus viability were comparable on the two masks; both showing a nearly 1 log decrease from 24 to 48 h, stable titres between 2 and 4 days, and a steady decline from days 7 through 21 (Fig. 1E,F) . On Tyvek, infectious SARS-CoV-2 persisted up to 14 days; again, reduced to very low levels compared to the starting inoculum. Persistence patterns on this material (Fig. 1G ) most closely resembled those for stainless steel.

Of all the materials tested, cotton provided the lowest environmental stability to SARS-CoV-2. After only a single hour of drying, over 4 logs of viable virus were lost, representing a 99.995% decrease from input inoculum. After 4 h of drying, a further decrease was recorded and only two of three technical replicates produced viable virus upon elution. By the 24 h time point and at all subsequent sampling days, infectious SARS-CoV-2 on cotton was below limits of detection by TCID 50 (Fig. 1H) .

To provide additional confidence to stability data on cotton, two additional short-term persistence trials were carried out, with sampling at identical intervals as the initial long-term experiment but up to only 3 dpi (Fig. 2) . Results obtained were in agreement with those observed on the initial experiment; a single hour of drying resulted in over four logs of inactivation and additional loss of viability was recorded by 4 h post-inoculation. By the 24 h sampling point, all biological replicates from both independent experiments were negative by TCID 50 assay. A single biological replicate from one of the trials, however, resulted in CPE on the safety test following addition of the full volume of residual inoculum (~ 500 µl) from the eluted coupon. At the time of inoculation, www.nature.com/scientificreports/ potential wicking of the inoculum from the cotton coupon onto the culture plate below was noted for that particular biological replicate, however this cannot be confirmed as the cause for maintained viability. No further positivity was observed at any subsequent sampling point.

Persistence of viral RNA. To (Fig. 1) . When eluted from cotton, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was recovered at slightly lower yet relatively high titers (~ 7.9 logs) at the 1 and 4 h sampling times, followed by a gradual reduction between days 1 and 14 post inoculation (Fig. 1H ).

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented burdens on healthcare facilities worldwide. While respiratory droplets are considered an important mode of transmission, the role of fomites in the spread of SARS-CoV-2, as suggested for SARS-CoV-1 12 , is also suspected 13 . Our work represents the first comprehensive characterization of SARS-CoV-2 persistence on PPE materials and inanimate surfaces typical of healthcare facilities. Viable SARS-CoV-2 was recovered after 21 days on plastic, 14 days on stainless steel, 7 days on nitrile gloves and 4 days on chemical resistant gloves. Though reduced from baseline, significant quantities of viable SARS-CoV-2 could be recovered from inoculated N-95 and N-100 masks at 14 days. When dried onto Tyvek, infectious SARS-CoV-2 persisted up to 14 days. Of all the materials tested, cotton provided the lowest environmental stability to SARS-CoV-2. After only a single hour of drying, over 4 logs of viable virus were lost, representing a 99.995% decrease from input inoculum. These results have direct relevance to Infection Prevention and Control practices, laundering and waste handling protocols in healthcare settings.

The global shortage of N-95 masks has led healthcare centers worldwide to extend the usage of these masks despite them being designed for single use 5 . Our results demonstrate that this decision, in the absence of a decontamination strategy, may result in persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on the mask. Persistence of other viruses, such as influenza, Ebolavirus, and other coronaviruses, has been reported on experimentally-inoculated respirators 6, 14, 15 . While a number of decontamination methodologies show promise for the re-use of N-95s 16,17 , our results suggest that careful attention must be paid to their collection criteria and provision of appropriate risk-based PPE to staff involved in sorting and packaging of these masks prior to decontamination.

Our finding that SARS-CoV-2 can remain viable for up to 2 weeks at room temperature on Tyvek is novel and significant. Tyvek garments have been widely adopted in high-risk healthcare, field, and laboratory settings due to unique tensile properties combined with imperviousness to infectious agents. Viral persistence on Tyvek, combined with our demonstration of viral persistence on plastic has implications for the re-use of Powered Air Purifying Respirator hoods (PAPRs) in health care settings. Disinfection of these devices has proven to be challenging 18 . These results highlight the need for risk-based decision-making and implementation of appropriate decontamination protocols where re-use of these critical PPE components is practiced.

The extremely limited viability of SARS-CoV-2 on cotton aligns with survival results of other enveloped viruses on cotton, including those of human and avian origin 6, 19, 20 . Previous investigations by our group on the persistence of Ebola virus on PPE showed comparable trends, with viable virus decreasing by 99% within a single hour of deposition on cotton and becoming entirely undetectable by 24 h while RNA remained detectable throughout the course of study 21 . Similar to our results with SARS-CoV-2, the viability of SARS-CoV-1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ when applied at 10 5 TCID 50 /ml was limited to 1 h on a cotton gown compared to 24 h on a disposable gown 22 .

Although there was a slight decrease in the amount of RNA recovered from the cotton fabric when compared to the other materials, this was minor when compared to the substantial loss of virus viability (complete absence by 24 h in 8/9 replicates). While it is possible that retention of the RNA and virus in the cotton may have contributed to a small portion of the lowered recovery, clearly the greater than 6 logs reduction of viable virus over the PCR reflects the fact that cotton has a significant effect on virus viability. The porous nature of the cotton fabric, increasing the surface area onto which the inoculum droplet was adsorbed and subsequently subjected to drying, is likely to augmented viral degradation thereby decreasing virus viability as well as quantification of RNA. While this manuscript was in its revision stage, a study released by Riddell and colleagues corroborated our observations on the reduced viability of SARS-CoV-2 on cotton compared to other materials 23 . Using a similarly high titer inoculum, a significant loss of infectious virus was noted after an hour of drying, though persistence was detectable up to 7 days. This difference may be attributed to the specific material attributes of the cotton cloths used in the two studies, and/or differences in protein content in the concentrated virus preparation without use of a sucrose cushion. The use of non-medical masks to limit the spread of transmissible respiratory diseases, including COVID-19, has been contentious. While mounting evidence suggests that simple cloth masks could be effective in limiting SARS-CoV-2 24 , others have questioned the efficacy of manufactured or home-made cloth masks to effectively prevent release of viral particles from infected individuals 25, 26 . Our observations in the present study are not intended for inference on the ability of cotton masks to prevent aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, nor do they address filtration efficacy of cotton against the virus. However, the fact that virus viability is rapidly reduced on cotton exposure has implications for droplet transmission for both the wearer and nearby contacts, and complements the growing support of widespread cotton mask use. Further, these results suggest that the use of cottonbased fabrics in healthcare settings may present a lower risk during handling for subsequent decontamination and reuse. The use of cotton mask covers to extend the usage of N95 masks), a growing trend in major medical centers 27 , presents an excellent example of such a risk mitigation strategy.

The survival of SARS-Cov-2 on environmental surfaces has been described in two heavily cited studies 28, 29 . Our results are in agreement with those reported, however viral persistence was significantly prolonged under our experimental conditions. These discrepancies are likely due to a combination of different ambient conditions, inoculum titres, and readout assay sensitivity. Indeed, in the recently published work of Riddell and colleagues 23 , extended persistence of SARS-CoV-2 for up to 28 days was observed under experimental conditions most closely resembling those utilized herein.

The work of Chin and colleagues 28 , using a 5 µl droplet of high titre stock virus (~ 7.8 log TCID 50 units/mL), most closely resembled our inoculation conditions. The reported 65% RH in their study compared to ~ 40% RH under our experimental conditions is likely a significant contributor to the reduction in viability over time. The detrimental effects of high relative humidity on survival of other coronaviruses, including MERS and SARS-CoV-1, has been demonstrated [30] [31] [32] . Nevertheless, the availability of data specific to diverse environmental conditions is of importance to capture the realities at different geographical locations.

In the report by Van Doremalen et al. 29 , viable SARS-CoV-2 persisted up to only 3 days on stainless steel and plastic. While the reported ambient conditions more closely represented ours, the titre of infectious SARS-CoV-2 applied to test surfaces was approximately 2 logs lower than that applied in our study. The protective effect of high titre inoculum on environmental persistence has been previously shown for SARS-CoV-1 22 and therefor the extended survival observed under our experimental design is not surprising.

An additional factor differentiating the present work from other studies is the matrix in which inoculum was prepared. Contamination in a healthcare setting can occur through droplets from an array of infectious biological fluids, therefore a standardized tripartite soil load 10 was included in our experimental inoculum. The added stability provided by matrices to viruses under drying conditions has been demonstrated for many viruses, including SARS-CoV-1 10, 33, 34 . The recent findings of Riddell and colleagues, demonstrating persistence of viable SARS-CoV-2 up to 28 days on several surfaces 23 strongly supports the role of an organic matrix combined with high titer inoculum in the extended viral persistence observed in our experimental setting.

The decision to use a high titre inoculum in our study was to represent a worst-case scenario of SARS-CoV-2 persistence on a contaminated surface. Shedding of viral RNA from COVID-19 patients varies widely based on sample type, time post-symptom onset, severity of disease, and on an individual basis 35, 36 . Clinical data from mild and severe cases has revealed a range of data, with median initial viral loads of 5.11 and 6.17 log 10 copies of viral RNA per ml in mild and severe cases, respectively 37 . In a critically ill patient, loads of up to 1.34 × 10 11 copies per mL were detected 36 . Data on infectious virus shed in excreta from acutely ill COVID-19 patients is lacking. However, in a recently published SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis study, peak viral loads of > 6 log 10 TCID 50 / mL, corresponding to 11 log 10 TCID 50 RNA copies per mL were observed in the golden hamster model 38 . Taking these data into consideration, our experimental model would more closely demonstrate environmental contamination from a severe COVID-19 case.

A potential limitation of this study lies in testing being carried out in a high containment laboratory, where 12 air exchanges per hour may represent a high air flow not necessarily representative of most health facilities, homes and other environments. In addition, the initial hour of drying time under a biosafety cabinet would have accelerated the drying effect and may have shortened the amount of time to inactivate the virus. However, the revealed persistence of up to 21 days was significant and may be the best-case scenario associated with high airflow conditions that can occur in some health care environments.

Additionally, the implications of these results and those of others 23, 28, 29 on the duration of potential fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 should be interpreted with caution due to the sampling methodology utilized. Viral recovery was achieved by material saturation in media, enabling recovery of extremely low levels of remaining virus. Had we employed a swabbing method to more closely mimic a casual contact scenario, a decrease in www.nature.com/scientificreports/ sensitivity would be expected and thus duration of viable virus detection may have been reduced. As a result, the data generated represent a worst-case scenario for potential exposure through these contaminated surfaces, though the risk of fomite transmission through casual contact can only be inferred by the presence of infectious virus at a given time point.

Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can remain infectious on contaminated PPE for extended periods under ambient environmental conditions. Conversely, they demonstrate that stability is highly reduced on cotton even within hours of contamination, and encourage the use of 100% cotton in infection prevention and control practices where fluid-resistant barriers are not required. These results underline the importance of proper handling of personal protective equipment during and following use in high-risk settings to minimize the likelihood of fomite transmission, and may assist centers in developing guidelines and protocols relating to decontamination and reuse of PPE in short supply.

Italian doctors call for protecting healthcare workers and boosting community surveillance during covid-19 outbreak

COVID-19 How many Healthcae workers are infected?

Health-Care Workers Make Up 1 in 10 Known Cases of COVID-19 in Ontario

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and healthcare workers

Critical supply shortages-the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic

Evaluating environmental persistence and disinfection of the Ebola virus Makona variant

A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints

Quantitative Carrier Tests (QCT) to Assess the Germicidal Activities of Chemicals: Rationale and Procedures

Standard Quantitative Disk Carrier Test Method for Determining the Bactericidal, Virucidal, Fungicidal, Mycobactericidal and Sporicidal Activities of Liquid Chemical Germicides

A disc-based quantitative carrier test method to assess the virucidal activity of chemical germicides

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research Use Only 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Primers and Probes

Role of fomites in SARS transmission during the largest hospital outbreak in Hong Kong

Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient

Persistence of the 2009 pandemic influenza a (H1N1) virus on N95 respirators

Coronavirus survival on healthcare personal protective equipment

Effectiveness of N95 Respirator Decontamination and Reuse against SARS-CoV-2 Virus

Decontamination of N95 masks for re-use employing 7 widely available sterilization methods

Assessment of half-mask elastomeric respirator and powered air-purifying respirator reprocessing for an influenza pandemic

Survival of two avian respiratory viruses on porous and nonporous surfaces

Survival of Influenza Viruses on Environmental Surfaces

Challenge of liquid stressed protective materials and environmental persistence of ebola virus

Survival of SARS Coronavirus

The effect of temperature on persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on common surfaces

Face masks against COVID-19: an evidence review

Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: a controlled comparison in 4 patients

Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: Would they protect in an influenza pandemic?

N95 Mask Cover Instructions

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions

Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1

Stability of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) under different environmental conditions

The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS coronavirus

Effects of air temperature and relative humidity on coronavirus survival on surfaces

Stability and inactivation of SARS coronavirus

Resistance of surface-dried virus to common disinfection procedures

SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients

Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples

Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study

Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus in golden Syrian hamsters

We kindly thank Dr. Yohannes Berhane for his insightful review of this manuscript. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

T.C conceived and designed the experiments. Experimental work and data analyses were carried out by T.C, A.L. and S.B.K. Figures and tables were prepared by S.B.K, and all authors contributed to the main manuscript text and its final review.

The authors declare no competing interests.

The online version contains supplementary material available at https ://doi. org/10.1038/s4159 8-020-80098 -3.Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.C.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.