key: cord-0822044-m9tuv442 authors: Lee, Hyeon-Ah; Ahn, Myung Hee; Byun, Seonjeong; Lee, Hae-Kook; Kweon, Yong-Sil; Chung, Seockhoon; Shin, Yong-Wook; Lee, Kyoung-Uk title: How COVID-19 Affected Healthcare Workers in the Hospital Locked Down due to Early COVID-19 Cases in Korea date: 2021-11-16 journal: J Korean Med Sci DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e325 sha: 8d077dd8684ca169539c61b3c5e2bd87299afad7 doc_id: 822044 cord_uid: m9tuv442 BACKGROUND: The healthcare workers (HCWs) were exposed to never-experienced psychological distress during the early stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of HCWs during the hospital lockdown period due to mass healthcare-associated infection during the early spread of COVID-19. METHODS: A real-time online survey was conducted between April 14–18, 2020 among HCWs who worked at the university hospital where COVID-19 was confirmed in a patient, and the hospital was shut down for 3 weeks. Along with demographic variables and work-related information, psychological distress was measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey scale, and the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9. RESULTS: The HCWs working in the cohort ward and those who have experienced social discrimination had significantly higher level of depression (PHQ-9 score; 5.24 ± 4.48 vs. 4.15 ± 4.38; P < 0.01 and 5.89 ± 4.78 vs. 3.25 ± 3.77; P < 0.001, respectively) and anxiety (GAD-7 score; 3.69 ± 3.68 vs. 2.87 ± 3.73; P < 0.05 and 4.20 ± 4.22 vs. 2.17 ± 3.06; P < 0.001, respectively) compared to other HCWs. Worries regarding the peer relationship and the skepticism about job were associated with depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–1.79; P < 0.05 and OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.31–2.17; P < 0.001, respectively) and anxiety (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.21–2.49; P < 0.01 and OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09–2.17; P < 0.05, respectively), while fear of infection or worsening of health was not. Path analysis showed that work-related stress associated with the viral epidemic rather than anxiety about the viral epidemic mainly contributed to depression. CONCLUSION: The present observational study indicates that mental health problems of HCWs exposed to COVID-19 are associated with distress in work and social relationship. Early intervention programs focusing on these factors are necessary. Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or coronavirus disease 2019 was detected in December 2019 in China, 1 the virus has quickly spread worldwide. On January 19, 2020, first patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in Korea; the number of COVID-19 patients soon drastically increased, exceeding 5,000 within 6 weeks. On February 21, 2020, the COVID-19 cases were first reported in Seoul Metropolitan area at the Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, which caused massive public fear of the uncontrolled transmission of COVID-19 in the most populated area in Korea. 2 This first case resulting from healthcare-associated infections (HAI) at a university hospital in Korea hurried the government into announcing the highest alert level of infectious disease nationwide on February 23, 2020. 3 The mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) is a major concern during the outbreak of COVID-19. 4,5 Before the development of vaccination and therapeutic options, fear of being infected with COVID-19 6,7 along with anxiety, insomnia, and depression were prominent mental problems among HCWs. 4,8, 9 Specifically, lockdown of the hospital had significantly undermined the mental health of the quarantined HCWs. 10, 11 Previous studies consistently reported various problems including exhaustion, anxiety, depression, deterioration of work performance, and social discrimination related to work among HCWs who worked under quarantine or isolation. 11- 15 The stress related to COVID-19 pandemic had several domains including fear of being infected or infecting others, being stigmatized, performing poorly or losing jobs. 2,16, 17 Currently, in March 2021, most countries are providing COVID-19 vaccination with its top priority being frontline HCWs. Though still prevalent, the mental health problems among the HCWs are now different from those during the early pandemic phase of COVID-19, both in feature and intensity. People have adapted to the threat posed by pandemic, and are less fearful of the virus as knowledge about its treatment and prevention is being communicated. 18 Despite the abundance of studies reporting mental health problems among HCWs exposed to the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have measured what domains of pandemic-related stress caused anxiety and depression among quarantined HCWs during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2020, the second mass HAI in Korea occurred at the Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, 19 which is the sister hospital of Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital which had reported the first mass HAI in Korea. Using real-time online survey, we measured COVID-19-related stress and events, the levels of depression, anxiety, and burnout among HCWs of Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital. This study evaluated the HCWs working at a university hospital during the lockdown period during the early spread of COVID-19 and provides a unique opportunity to explore how COVID-19 affected the mental health of HCWs. the hospital to full function took 40 days following the outbreak of the first COVID-19 case in the hospital. All HCWs were asked to anonymously answer an online self-rated questionnaire during the lockdown period. Demographic data including age, gender, and marital status were gathered. Work-related data including information about their jobs, the experience of being quarantined, and working at the cohort wards were obtained. The COVID-19-related events COVID-19-related events including the experience of being quarantined at home and working at the cohort ward were obtained. Experiences of social discrimination were determined by the following question: "Have you experienced any social discrimination because of working at a hospital where COVID-19 cases were confirmed?" The Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) scale The 9-item SAVE-9 scale was originally developed for the assessment of HCWs work-related stress response to the viral epidemic. 20 The scale has two domains: 1) anxiety about the viral epidemic, and 2) work-related stress associated with the viral epidemic. Respondents can answer each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The appropriate cut-off score of SAVE-9 scale according to a mild degree of anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7] score ≥ 5) was observed as 22. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) The PHQ-9 21 is a self-report screening test and consists of nine items to assess for the presence of the nine diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). 22 Each item of PHQ-9 can be scored on a 4-point Likert scale as follows: 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than a week), 3 (nearly every day). The total score of the PHQ-9 scale can range from 0 to 27, and higher scores reflect severe degrees of depressive symptoms. The Korean version of the PHQ-9 was validated by various studies in the general population and in a primary care setting. 23, 24 In this study, clinical depression was defined as PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 points. 25 The GAD-7 was developed to screen and measure the severity of GAD symptoms in primary healthcare settings. 26,27 It consists of seven items rated on a 4-point Likert scale as follows: 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than a week), 3 (nearly every day). The total score of the GAD-7 scale can range from 0 to 21, and higher scores reflect severe degrees of anxiety symptoms. In this study, clinical anxiety symptom was defined as GAD-7 score ≥ 10 points. 26 The MBI-GS 28 is a self-rating scale widely used for assessing burnout. It includes 3 subscales: exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. The exhaustion scale relates to physical and emotional resource depletion caused by workplace stress. The cynicism scale describes an impersonal and distant attitude toward the work overall. The professional efficacy scale measures feelings of achievement at work. The degree of burnout is determined to be higher when the score is high in exhaustion and cynicism and low in professional efficacy. High levels of exhaustion (> 3.5) and either high cynicism (> 3.5) or low professional efficacy (< 2.5) were selected as the primary criteria to estimate degree of burnout. 29 The Student's t-test was used to compare mental health as measured by PHQ-9, GAD-7, MBI-GS, and SAVE-9 between HCWs who were exposed to COVID-19-related events and those who were not. Binary logistic regression was applied to examine the COVID-19-related events and items of SAVE-9 that are associated with the HCWs' depression and anxiety. The HCWs' depression vs. no depression was defined by PHQ-9 total score (≥ 10 points) and anxiety versus no anxiety was defined by GAD-7 total score (≥ 10 points). Age and sex were included in the regression model to adjust the results accordingly. For further analysis to explore how COVID-19-related stress, measured by SAVE-9, affects mental health, path analysis was performed based on the total scores of PHQ-9, GAD-7, MBI-GS, and the scores of the two known factors of SAVE-9: 1) anxiety about the viral epidemic and 2) work-related stress associated with the viral epidemic. The software R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and AMOS 27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used for binary logistic regression analysis and path analysis, respectively. All tests were 2-tailed and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The survey dates for the study, from April 14, 2020 to April 18, 2020, were in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea. The COVID-19 outbreaks in the Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, the second set of HAI in South Korea, received national attention. 19 Fig. 1 provides the peaked Google trend for the term "Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital" right before the survey during the lockdown of the hospital, which shows the context of vulnerability that they had experienced social discrimination because they were working at the hospital where COVID-19 patients were confirmed and contained. The total score of the SAVE-9 was 29.17 ± 7.05, and anxiety subscale and work-related stress subscale scores were 3.63 ± 0.84 and 2.62 ± 0.79, respectively ( Table 1) . Regarding the psychological distress of the HCWs, the percentage of the HCWs who had depression (PHQ-9 total scores ≥ 10) was 11.4%. The percentage of the HCWs who had generalized anxiety (GAD-7 total scores ≥ 10) was 6.5%. The proportion of the HCWs who had experienced burnout based on MBI-GS scores was 10.6%. Those HCWs who were quarantined due to exposure to the COVID-19 patients had significantly higher total scores of the SAVE-9 (30.08 ± 6.60 vs. 28 Fig. 2 shows the association between the experience of COVID-19-related stress and having depression or anxiety. The COVID-19-related stress include the items of SAVE-9 and whether HCWs experienced COVID-19-related social discrimination, quarantine, or working at cohort ward. As depicted in Fig. 2 The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers 0.01), and the experience of the social discrimination (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.06-5.91; P < 0.05) were associated with anxiety. Notably, Q6 and Q9 belong to the SAVE-9 work-related stress subscale and Q5 belongs to the SAVE-9 infection anxiety subscale. Do you think that your colleagues would have more work to do due to your absence from a possible quarantine and might blame you? Q . Do you worry your family or friends may become infected because of you? Q . After this experience, do you think you will avoid treating patients with viral illnesses? Q . Do you feel skeptical about your job after going through this experience? Q . Are you worried that others might avoid you even after the infection risk has been minimized? Q . Are you more sensitive towards minor physical symptoms than usual? Q . Socially discriminated Quarantined Working at cohort ward Are you worried that you might get infected? Q . Are you afraid your health will worsen because of the virus? Q . Are you afraid the virus outbreak will continue indefinitely? Q . Using a real-time online survey, the present study investigated the psychological impact of COVID-19 and predictors of depression in HCWs working at a university hospital which had been locked down during the early spread of COVID-19 pandemic. During COVID-19 outbreak, HCWs engaged in treating or managing patients with COVID-19 experienced significantly higher psychological distress than HCWs who did not, as evidenced by higher scores on the SAVE-9, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and MBI-GS scales. This is consistent with previous studies reporting that HCWs who have been in contact with patients with pandemic diseases including COVID-19, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) experienced an acute traumatic response. [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] However, our study shows that the predictor of depression of HCWs was not due to fear or anxiety of COVID-19 infection, but the work-related social stress that they might be shunned (Q5 item in SAVE-9) or blamed (Q9) due to the COVID-19 infection. The HCWs working at the cohort ward experienced higher levels of social discrimination than those not working in the ward and the HCWs who had experienced social discrimination showed increased mental distress; these findings emphasize the social nature of the distress caused by COVID-19 in HCWs. The skepticism about their job among the HCWs (Q6) showed the highest OR predicting depression and anxiety, suggesting that work-related stress could be the main source of distress in HCWs during infectious disease pandemics. The experiences of social discrimination and prejudice were predictors of generalized anxiety. Social stigma had various negative consequences such as higher prevalence of stress or burnout in HCWs treating patients with MERS 36 and COVID-19. 37 In our analysis using a path model, work-related stress including fear of social discrimination was the main contributor of generalized anxiety that had a direct effect on depression. Although previous studies also reported that feelings of vulnerability, changes in workload, fear of being blamed and isolated, and worries of adapting to changing environments were the factors responsible for psychological distress among HCWs managing infectious diseases 38-40 ; they rarely suggested that distress regarding work and social relations were the main source of mental problems including depression and anxiety among HCWs. The COVID-19 pandemic is now becoming a crisis with regards to work and social relations in the general population. 41, 42 Our results show that COVID-19 had disturbed the work and social relations of HCWs during the early phase of the pandemic. The present study showed that 11.4% (n = 87) of HCWs employed at hospitals with COVID-19 cases exhibited depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) and 6.5% (n = 50) had generalized anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 score ≥ 10). Previous studies showed that symptoms of anxiety and depression were reported in 25.5-44.6% and 12. respectively. The relatively lower rate of psychological distress compared to that in other countries, especially generalized anxiety of the HCWs in the present study, may be due to the differences in the number of confirmed cases, differences in working environment, using different measures, and varying organizational communication and support, 47,48 etc. The present study has several limitations. As this was a cross-sectional study, the causality between depression and work-related stress or worries of social discrimination could not be established. To increase the response rate in the survey, we did not include questionnaires evaluating previous psychiatric history, personality traits, or details of workload and lifestyle factors, which might elaborate the relationship between work-related social stress and mental health of HCWs. Finally, since this study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital, the results may not be generalized to HCWs in community settings. However, despite the limitations, the results of the study provide a novel case showing that HCWs engaged in treating or managing patients with suspected COVID-19 were at a higher risk of displaying psychiatric symptoms due to the worries and anxiety about work and social relations. Thus, early screening and effective intervention programs focusing on work-related social stress among HCWs are required. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin Letter to the Editor: Risk communication, shared responsibility, and mutual trust are matters: real lessons from closure of Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital due to coronavirus disease 2019 in Korea Korean Society of Infectious Diseases; Korean Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Report on the epidemiological features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the Republic of Korea from Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 in Wuhan: sociodemographic characteristics and hospital support measures associated with the immediate psychological impact on healthcare workers Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): predictors in an online study conducted in Fear and avoidance of healthcare workers: an important, under-recognized form of stigmatization during the COVID-19 pandemic The psychological impact of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review of the evidence Anxiety, depression, stress, fear and social support during COVID-19 pandemic among Jordanian healthcare workers Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence The endless quarantine: the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare workers after three months of mandatory social isolation in Argentina Depression, anxiety and stress among Indians in times of COVID-19 lockdown Mental health status of health-care professionals working in quarantine and non-quarantine Egyptian hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic Risk perception and impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: What can we learn? Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: a cross-sectional study Molecular epidemiology of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospitalized patients in Greece Anxiety reported by US adults in 2019 and during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: population-based evidence from two nationally representative samples The Korea Herald. Major hospitals in Seoul area on alert against COVID-19 infiltration Development of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) scale for assessing work-related stress and anxiety in healthcare workers in response to viral epidemics Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Standardization of the Korean version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 as a screening instrument for major depressive disorder Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Korean version in the elderly population: the Ansan Geriatric study Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 Validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and GAD-2 in patients with migraine Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual MBI-GS): an application in South Korea Prevalence of health care worker burnout during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan Subjective burden and perspectives of German healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors associated with the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on nurses and other hospital workers in Toronto Psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on health workers in a tertiary hospital Psychological effects of the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong on high-risk health care workers Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution Mental health of nurses working at a government-designated hospital during a MERS-CoV Outbreak: a cross-sectional study Social stigma during COVID-19 and its impact on HCWs outcomes The psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on healthcare workers in emergency departments and how they cope Nurses' experience with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: an evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers The effect of the 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak on social relationships: a cross-sectional study in Jordan Working in a pandemic: exploring the impact of COVID-19 health anxiety on work, family, and health outcomes Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity and psychological adaptation of the nurses in a structured SARS caring unit during outbreak: a prospective and periodic assessment study in Taiwan How to provide an effective primary health care in fighting against severe acute respiratory syndrome: the experiences of two cities Impact of severe respiratory syndrome on anxiety levels of front-line health care workers Pandemic-specific factors related to generalized anxiety disorder during the initial COVID-19 protocols in the United States We would like to appreciate all the healthcare workers in Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital who voluntarily participated in the survey.