key: cord-0817733-u0nooysz authors: Ruiz Medina, Leonardo; Moshtaghi, Omid; Kuang, Jessica; Schalch Lepe, Paul title: Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study date: 2021-12-11 journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol DOI: 10.1002/lio2.716 sha: f9514628b1b27be4642ceaf58cede81cb1b2bf2d doc_id: 817733 cord_uid: u0nooysz OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. RESULTS: In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. CONCLUSION: TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. The novel acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide with more than 158 million confirmed cases and more than 3 million confirmed deaths reported by the World Health Organization. Although the number of new cases is decreasing with the introduction of vaccines, the imminent threat of a resistant variant continues to be a motivating factor in reducing the spread of this virus. 1, 2 SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via respiratory droplets and can be transported in aerosols of varying size. 3, 4 Given pandemic precautions, elective procedures of the head and neck involving mucosal surfaces continue to pose an inoculation threat to otolaryngologist and team members involved in surgery. Most head and neck surgeries are considered aerosol generating medical procedures; therefore, the risk of contamination is particularly high. Notably, tonsillectomies and other procedures involving the oropharyngeal mucosa have demonstrated a high viral load. 5 A variety of surgical instruments and technologies are available for tonsillectomy. With each technology there is a varying degree of aerosolization. 6 Among them, a novel bayonet-style thermal welding device (TWD) (ENTceps; Microline Surgical, Beverly, Massachusetts; Figure 1 ) utilizes pressure and heat to generate a temperature gradient. This allows the device to cut tissue between the forceps and coagulate mucosa peripherally to form a seal. 7 In the context of SARS-CoV-2 and the introduction of this new technology, we set out to explore this instrument and its potential in reducing aerosolization in tonsillectomy. The study was performed at an outpatient surgical facility, in a 22 0 6 00 Â 16 0 6 00 Â 8 0 operating room. The equipment was tested and calibrated prior to measurements, according to manufacturer's instructions. Room temperature cow tongue and porcine nose tissue was selected as a surrogate for human upper airway tissue. All devices were set to a higher than recommended setting for live human tissue. This was done to maximize the particle burden difference between the devices. The settings were as follows: 50 W cut and 60 W coagulation for monopolar electrocautery; 70 W for bipolar electrocautery, and setting 7 (1 is the lowest and 8 is the highest) equivalent to 8.3 W for ENTceps. Each device modality was used on both tissues. The tissues were each ablated or cauterized for 3 minutes at a time. Multiple measurements were taken at 1-, 2-, and 3-minute time points. Baseline ambient particle count was measured prior to each trial. Aerosolized particles were measured using an Extech VPC300 electronic particle counter (Nashua, New Hampshire) placed 50 cm away from the cauterization site, which closely simulates the typical distance between the cauterization site and the surgeon's face. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. The highest value recorded over the course of 3 minutes was used. The baseline ambient room measurement obtained prior to each trial was subtracted from these values. Statistical analysis was completed using Student's t-test; a P-value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. On both tissue types, TWD had the lowest absolute aerosolizing burden among the three devices (Table 1) . TWD was compared independently against the highest particle value of both monopolar and bipolar electrocautery. Monopolar electrocautery proved to have the F I G U R E 1 ENTceps (Microline Surgical, Beverly, Massachusetts) This is the first study that specifically measures the particle burden of TWD in comparison to other devices used in oropharyngeal procedures. Our study demonstrates a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device that is used with TWD having the lowest burden and monopolar electrocautery having the highest ( Figure 2 ). This difference in particle burden was statistically significant for particle size of 0.5 and 10 μm when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery (Table 1) . Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States with more than 200,000 tonsillectomies performed on patients 15 years or older and over 500,000 performed in younger patients. 6, 8 Prior studies have repeatedly demonstrated that viral particles are viable in aerosolizing surgical procedures using energy devices and electrocautery. 9 Although there is no conclusive evidence regarding risk of transmission, measures to protect health care staff using PPE, smoke evacuation, and filtration are commonly implemented. For smoke evacuation in particular, studies have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing aerosolization particle exposure in tonsillectomies. 10 In addition to the common practices mentioned above, the decision of which surgical devices to use in such a common procedure is also important in the effort of minimizing the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral particles. Studies have detected SARS-CoV-2 DNA in droplet particles ranging from <5 to 10 μm. 11 Although there is no statistical significance when comparing TWD against bipolar electrocautery, the utility of bipolar electrocautery can be limited in tonsillectomy. Bipolar is excellent at hemostasis however is inefficient at cutting tonsillar tissue and therefore Randomized control studies have shown the same or decreased pain associated with TWD when compared with bipolar or monopolar cautery. 7, 12, 13 Thus, the use of TWD offers an alternative approach to monopolar/bipolar electrocautery by providing a favorable aerosolizing burden along with an efficient means of performing the surgery. However, the use of energy devices for cauterization is still usually needed to some degree to achieve hemostasis. 14 Thermal welding device produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. Omid Moshtaghi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-2019 Paul Schalch Lepe https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-6850 COVID-19: a new challenge for human beings Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions: scientific brief Minimum sizes of respiratory particles carrying SARS-CoV-2 and the possibility of aerosol generation Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary Clinical evidence-based review and recommendations of aerosol generating medical procedures in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic Ambulatory surgery in the United States Thermal welding versus bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a comparative study Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children Electrocautery, diathermy, and surgical energy devices: are surgical teams at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic Respiratory virus RNA is detectable in airborne and droplet particles Surgical team exposure to cautery smoke and its mitigation during tonsillectomy Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: postoperative hemorrhage Postoperative outcome of thermal welding tonsillectomy versus monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a randomized control study Randomized controlled trial of coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study