key: cord-0814409-e0p59tvc
authors: Gröhn, Stina; Heinimäki, Suvi; Tamminen, Kirsi; Blazevic, Vesna
title: Expression of influenza A virus-derived peptides on a rotavirus VP6-based delivery platform
date: 2020-10-16
journal: Arch Virol
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-020-04847-5
sha: 24a4c29f324bf29c224c06f9632fc922b5e81b2b
doc_id: 814409
cord_uid: e0p59tvc

Recombinant protein technology enables the engineering of modern vaccines composed of a carrier protein displaying poorly immunogenic heterologous antigens. One promising carrier is based on the rotavirus inner-capsid VP6 protein. We explored different VP6 insertion sites for the presentation of two peptides (23 and 140 amino acids) derived from the M2 and HA genes of influenza A virus. Both termini and three surface loops of VP6 were successfully exploited as genetic fusion sites, as demonstrated by the expression of the fusion proteins. However, further studies are needed to assess the morphology and immunogenicity of these constructs.

Modern bioengineering technologies have facilitated the design of subunit vaccines as safe and affordable alternatives to conventional vaccines [1] . At the frontline of the new alternatives are self-assembling protein-derived nanoparticles, which can also be employed as platforms or nanocarriers. These particles can be decorated with heterologous antigens, including peptides, protein domains, or (poly) saccharides with significant biological relevance but poor immunogenicity on their own due to small size, incorrect configuration, or lack of stability [1] . A protein functioning as a carrier typically has a highly ordered particulate structure and a size that is optimal for uptake by antigenpresenting cells [2] , efficiently inducing immune responses against the heteroantigens presented on the platform. One of the most frequently used platform technologies is based on virus-like particles [3] that have been successfully decorated with antigens of various origins, such as hepatitis B virus [4] and influenza virus [5] . Another promising nanocarrier is based on the rotavirus (RV) medium-layer VP6 protein, which forms various nanostructures when exposed to different physiological conditions [6] . These nanostructures are extremely immunogenic and have been shown to possess adjuvant properties when co-administered with antigens in vitro and in vivo [7] [8] [9] [10] .

It has been demonstrated previously that inserting foreign sequences by genetic fusion to the surface loops or N-terminus (N-t) of VP6 does not affect the structure of the VP6 monomer, allowing the insertion of at least a 15-amino-acid (aa) peptide [11, 12] . In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of insertions of different sizes on the expression of VP6 fusion proteins (FPs) by cloning these heterologous sequences at different sites of VP6. To test the capacity of VP6 to accommodate foreign antigenic sequences, we selected the extracellular domain of the M2 protein (M2e) and a stem fragment of hemagglutinin (HA) derived from influenza A virus as model antigens. These antigens are promising universal vaccine candidates due to their high degree of conservation [13, 14] . The HA stem fragment is known to induce broadly protective neutralizing antibodies [14] [15] [16] , whereas M2e induces cross-protective antibodies and CD8 + T cells [13, 17] . This study shows that VP6 can carry antigens of different sizes at several insertion sites. However, the insertion site affects the FP expression level and secretion pattern.

The internal positions (aa 171, aa 301 and aa 311 located in surface loops) in the 397-aa sequence of VP6 (RVA/ Hu-wt/RUS/Novosibirsk/Nov09-D83/2009/G1P [8] ) were selected based on a SWISS-MODEL analysis of the spatial conformation of the VP6 structure deposited by Mathieu et al. [18] in the Protein Data Bank (PDB code: 1qhd ) (Fig.1A) . Seven recombinant FPs (FP1-FP7) were designed by inserting the M2e peptide and/or HA stem fragment polypeptide to the surface loops, C-terminus (C-t), or N-t of VP6 by genetic fusion (Fig. 1B) . A 23-aa M2e peptide of human origin based on the consensus sequence SLLTEVET-PIRNEWGCRCNDSSD [13] was fused to the VP6 sequence at aa 171 (FP1, 48 kDa) and N-t (FP2, 48 kDa). Additionally, FPs containing three copies of the M2e sequence, of human, swine (SLLTEVETPTRSEWECRCSDSSD, A/ California/07/2009) and avian (type I consensus sequence SLLTEVETPTRNEWESRSSDSSD [19] [20] [21] ) origin, either as a tandem repeat at aa 171 (FP3, 56 kDa), or as individual peptides at aa 171, aa 301 and aa 311 (FP4, 56 kDa) were created. An HA stem fragment polypeptide (140 aa) was inserted at N-t (FP5, 62 kDa) and C-t (FP6, 62 kDa) of VP6. The HA stem fragment consists of aa 18-41 and aa 290-323 of subunit HA1 and aa 41-113 of subunit HA2 from the influenza A virus H1N1 HA (A/Puerto Rico/8/34 subtype) connected by GSA and GSAGSA linkers, and it mimics the structure of the epitope of the HA stem, inducing broadly neutralizing antibodies [14] . In addition, FP7 (65 kDa) was designed to contain both the human M2e peptide at aa 171 and the HA stem fragment polypeptide at N-t. Each insert was fused to the VP6 backbone with common flexible linkers (G 4 S) 1-3 to improve the display of the insert and to sustain the correct folding of the carrier protein. The DNAs coding for the FPs were synthetically subcloned into pFastBac™ 1 baculoviral transfer vectors by GeneART Gene Synthesis service (Germany).

Recombinant baculovirus (rBV) stocks were generated as described before [22] . Briefly, recombinant bacmids were constructed using the Bac-to-Bac™ Baculovirus Expression System (Gibco, Carlsbad, USA). Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells were transfected with bacmid DNA using Cellfectin II transfection reagent (Gibco), and after 4 days, the P0 rBV stocks were collected. The P0 stocks were used to infect Sf9 cells (2 × 10 6 cells/ml) to generate P1 stocks. The titers of the rBV stocks were determined using a Bac-PAK™ Baculovirus Rapid Titer Kit (TaKaRa, Mountain View, USA).

The optimal conditions for expression of each FP were determined by comparing different insect cell lines, Sf9 and High Five™ (Trichoplusia ni), cell densities (1 × 10 6 and 2 × 10 6 cells/ml), multiplicity of infection (MOI) values (1, 5 and 10 infectious units (IFU)/cell), and cultivation times (3-7 dpi). Sf9 cells were cultured in Sf-900™ III SFM medium (Gibco), and High Five™ cells in Insect-XPRESS™ Protein-free Insect Cell Medium (Lonza, Walkersville, USA). The optimization was carried out in 6-well plates (Nunc A/S, Roskilde, Denmark) with a volume of 2 ml and in culture flasks (Corning Inc., Corning, USA) with a volume of 30ml at +27°C in an orbital shaker (122 rpm). The optimal time for culture harvesting was deduced by monitoring the cytopathic effect using trypan blue staining (Countess™, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The cells were separated from the supernatant by centrifugation (1000 × g at +4°C for 20 min), and the pellets and supernatants were stored at -20° C and +4°C, respectively, for further characterization.

Protein expression from the pellet and supernatant of each culture was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using Mini Protean TGX Precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA) and PageBlue Protein Staining Solution (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA). To verify the presence of FPs, the supernatants and pellets were analyzed by VP6-specific Western blotting. The proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) using a Trans-Blot® SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad). The membranes were immunoblotted in an iBind Flex Western Device (Invitrogen) using 1:500-diluted mouse RV VP6 antibody IgG2a kappa (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, USA) and 1:1000-diluted goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). The immunoblots were developed using an Opti-4CN Substrate Kit (Bio-Rad). The FPs were also subjected to insert-specific Western blotting using anti-M2 (1:2000-diluted mouse influenza A M2 monoclonal antibody (14C2), Invitrogen) or anti-HA (1:500-diluted rabbit influenza A H1N1 hemagglutinin antibody, Sino Biological, Wayne, USA) antibodies and 1:1000-diluted goat anti-mouse (Sigma-Aldrich) or 1:5000-diluted goat anti-rabbit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) IgG-HRP, respectively. In addition, the ability of the FPs to trimerize was examined by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions as described by Peralta et al. [12] , followed by VP6-specific Western blotting.

The expression of FPs was analyzed by SDS-PAGE for each culturing condition described above. An MOI value of 1 and cell density of 1.0 × 10 6 cells/ml were determined to be optimal for all FPs, as no significant improvements in protein yields were observed when using higher MOI values or cell density at the time of infection (data not shown). A cultivation time of 6 days was determined to be optimal for all FPs based on expression levels and the number of dead cells in the cultures (>80%). The optimal cell line was deduced by observing the localization of the FPs (Fig. 2A) . All FPs with an internal insert (FP1, FP3, FP4, FP7) were predominantly intracellularly located with a minor quantity of protein secreted. In comparison, the FPs with an insert at either terminus (FP2, FP5 and FP6) were secreted in higher quantities into the cell culture supernatant. Therefore, the Sf9 cell line was determined to be optimal for intracellularly located FPs, while the High Five™ cell line was ideal for secreted FPs. The optimal production conditions determined for all FPs are presented in Table 1 .

The supernatants and pellets were further analyzed by immunoblotting to confirm the expression of each FP and to determine its size and antigenicity. All FPs exhibited a band of the expected size, when detected using a VP6-specific antibody, demonstrating successful expression of all products ( Fig. 2A) . A pronounced cleavage in FP5, FP6 and FP7 resulted in additional smaller proteins (~50 kDa), suggesting that a large terminal insert might expose these FPs to partial proteolysis. FPs containing M2e were also detected with an M2-specific antibody (Fig. 2B) , and FPs containing the HA stem fragment with an HA-specific antibody (Fig. 2C) , further confirming the presence of the correct insertions. According to the preliminary trimerization analysis, FP1, FP2, FP3, FP5 and FP6 were capable of trimerization (data not shown).

We have previously shown not only that VP6 is a potential candidate for a non-live RV vaccine [22, 23] but that it also possesses favorable adjuvant properties promoting the uptake and immunogenicity of the co-administered antigens [7] [8] [9] [10] . Due to these immunomodulatory functions, VP6 could serve as a potential carrier for foreign antigens with poor immunogenicity. The objectives of this study were to employ VP6 as a carrier for the influenza A virus M2e and HA stem fragment and to investigate the most appropriate insertion sites and conditions for successful expression of the FPs.

We found an MOI value of 1, cell density of 1.0 × 10 6 cells/ml and cultivation time of 6 days to be ideal for all FPs. These observations are in accordance with previous studies [24] , suggesting that a low MOI should be used with a low cell density, as only a fraction of the cell population is initially infected, and thus, a longer cultivation time is needed to support viral progeny and recombinant protein production, respectively. Sf9 cells were determined to be optimal for non-secreted FP production based on a higher expression level of FPs in the cell pellet, as observed previously [25] . High Five™ cells, in turn, were superior for secreted FPs, as the expression levels were generally higher in High Five™ supernatants than in Sf9 supernatants (data not shown). In support of this, it has been shown previously that High Five™ cells are more suitable for the expression of secreted proteins [25] .

According to the immunoblotting results, FPs with inserts at internal positions were predominantly intracellularly located, and FPs with terminal insertions were primarily secreted but also found in the pellets, similarly to wild-type VP6 [22, 23] . The intracellular accumulation of FPs may be due to internal insertions causing potential steric hindrance in the VP6 structure, thereby hampering the correct folding, trimerization, and/or oligomerization of VP6 [26] . The oligomerization state of each FP warrants further studies, but according to our preliminary results, inserts at aa 171, C-t or N-t do not prevent trimerization. Concurringly, Peralta et al. showed that an insert at the N-t does not affect the ability of VP6s to trimerize [12] . However, they could not detect trimers formed by VP6 carrying an insert at aa 171, aa 301 or aa 311. Despite the fact that some insertions might inhibit the trimerization of VP6 [12, 18] , we have recently shown that a lack of a high-order structures does not negatively affect VP6 uptake and presentation by murine bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells in vitro [27] .

The modifiability of protein-based vaccine platforms enables the decoration of carrier proteins with a large range of antigens, thus offering virtually unlimited vaccine opportunities. Additionally, platform technology ideally streamlines the manufacturing process, leading to potentially lower capital and operating costs. Since platform technology allows rapid and simple modifications with selected antigens, it could facilitate development of new vaccines against rapidly spreading viruses, such as influenza virus and coronaviruses. The present study demonstrates that VP6 has great potential to function as a platform for heterologous antigen display and delivery, as VP6 was capable of carrying 23-and 140-aa sequences at several insertion sites. In the light of recent findings, all FPs present the inserted antigens equally well. Therefore, we cannot make final statements on the best insertion sites, as the effect of insertions on VP6 structure and epitope accessibility has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Further studies are needed to determine the morphology and in vivo immunogenicity of the FPs, and thus the optimal insertion sites in VP6. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.

Platform technologies for modern vaccine manufacturing

Size-dependent immunogenicity: Therapeutic and protective properties of nano-vaccines against tumors

Engineering viruslike particles as vaccine platforms

Immunizations with chimeric hepatitis B virus-like particles to induce potential anti-hepatitis C virus neutralizing antibodies

Virus-like particles are a superior platform for presenting M2e epitopes to prime humoral and cellular immunity against influenza virus

Structural polymorphism of the major capsid protein of rotavirus

Rotavirus capsid VP6 tubular and spherical nanostructures act as local adjuvants when co-delivered with norovirus VLPs

Rotavirus Recombinant VP6 nanotubes act as an immunomodulator and delivery vehicle for norovirus virus-like particles

Rotavirus VP6 adjuvant effect on norovirus GII.4 virus-like particle uptake and presentation by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells in vitro and in vivo

Combination of three virus-derived nanoparticles as a vaccine against enteric pathogens; enterovirus, norovirus and rotavirus

A new rotavirus VP6-based foreign epitope presenting vector and immunoreactivity of VP4 epitope chimeric proteins

Chimeric recombinant rotavirus-like particles as a vehicle for the display of heterologous epitopes

A universal influenza A vaccine based on the extracellular domain of the M2 protein

Influenza hemagglutinin stem-fragment immunogen elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies and confers heterologous protection

Broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza viruses

Structure and accessibility of HA trimers on intact 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus to stem region-specific neutralizing antibodies

Long-Lasting Cross-Protection Against Influenza A by Neuraminidase and M2e-based immunization strategies

Atomic structure of the major capsid protein of rotavirus: implications for the architecture of the virion

Intranasal vaccination with M2e5x virus-like particles induces humoral and cellular immune responses conferring cross-protection against heterosubtypic influenza viruses

M2e-based universal influenza A vaccines

Virus-like particles containing multiple M2 extracellular domains confer improved crossprotection against various subtypes of influenza virus

Norovirus VLPs and rotavirus VP6 protein as combined vaccine for childhood gastroenteritis

Immune responses elicited against rotavirus middle layer protein VP6 inhibit viral replication in vitro and in vivo

Challenges for the production of virus-like particles in insect cells: the case of rotavirus-like particles

Tnao38, high five and Sf9-evaluation of host-virus interactions in three different insect cell lines: baculovirus production and recombinant protein expression

Protein chromatography: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology

Internalization and antigen presentation by mouse dendritic cells of rotavirus VP6 preparations differing in nanostructure