key: cord-0813751-8993jmfz authors: Affun-Adegbulu, Clara; Sarkar, Nandini D. P.; Abejirinde, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade; Van Belle, Sara; Adegbulu, Opemiposi title: Health systems recovery from COVID-19: a window of opportunity for (in)fertility care date: 2020-07-14 journal: Sexual and reproductive health matters DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1790090 sha: 7a8e1c288ad2a05e499ec9cad09b85dcb965a475 doc_id: 813751 cord_uid: 8993jmfz nan From the onset, medical and human rights experts and organisations warned of the immediate and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). Yet most gave little or no attention to fertilityrelated health care, 1 despite it affecting up to 180 million couples worldwide. 2 Even before the pandemic, infertility was already one of the most understudied and underfunded aspects of SRHR. Access to fertility services: a right or a privilege? The right to reproduce has been recognised for over 70 years, first appearing in the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This gives rise to positive state obligations to remove unnecessary barriers to fertility services, yet there are large disparities in how countries recognise and protect this right. With half of the world's population being without universal health coverage and infertility services being excluded from many essential service packages, 3 funding is one of the biggest barriers. For instance, in India, Nigeria 4,5 and other lowand middle-income countries, fertility care is often not on the health financing agenda at all, and even international organisations providing sexual and reproductive health services tend to overlook it. 6 This situation is exacerbated by the almost complete absence of infertility care from international discourses on SRHR, which means that there is limited advocacy for the inclusion of fertility care in service packages. People in highincome countries also face financial barriers to fertility care, for example in countries like Ireland and Switzerland, which do not offer public funding for assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs), 7 or the USA, where health care financing is primarily from private sources, health care costs are high, and insurance coverage for ARTs often limited. 8 Even where fertility care is publicly funded, access may be limited by factors such as age or the existence of previous children. 7 Sociocultural, legal and/or ideological factors linked to social identifiers such as race, class, ability, marital status, sexual orientation or identity may also result in some groups being explicitly or implicitly excluded from access to fertility care. Heteronormative and gender binary notions of parenthood 9 and restrictive definitions of suitability for motherhood or what a family should look like, could mean that LGBTQIA+ people face barriers, as is the case in various European countries where access is legally restricted to heterosexual couples. 7 Implicit barriers can also limit the access of certain populations to fertility services. In the USA, for instance, access to COMMENTARY 60 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group reproductive technologies for HIV seropositive individuals is extremely limited because few clinics offer such services, in spite of recommendations for these services to be offered to HIV-infected individuals and couples. 10 In Britain, the case of the 22-week pregnant, disabled, single, black woman who was instructed against her own and her family's wishes to have an abortion because the judge felt it was in "her best interests", exemplifies how perceptions of suitability for motherhood can influence access to reproductive rights. The Court of Appeal later overturned the lower court's ruling, but if this woman had wanted fertility treatment, it is unlikely that it would have been made available to her. 11 Post-COVID health systems recovery: an opportunity to build back better Currently, many people are unable to exercise their right to reproduce because of a lack of access to treatment for infertility. This situation is set to worsen post-COVID, given that many countries suspended fertility services as part of measures to limit the impact of the disease, 12,13 with repercussions for intending parents who may lose their access because they no longer meet eligibility conditions like age. Furthermore, the unprecedented scale of measures that have been deployed globally in response to the pandemic will likely have an impact on the future availability of both domestic and foreign resources and, consequently, the willingness and ability of governments to invest in the health sector. At the individual level, the increase in under/unemployment and job insecurity will mean that fewer people have financial access to infertility treatment. Post-COVID recovery nevertheless represents an opportunity for countries to identify and rectify weaknesses in pre-pandemic health systems and build back better. For fertility services, this will require action in five key areas. . There must be explicit recognition that sexual and reproductive health imperatively includes treatment for infertility and related services. . Since health needs are likely to increase from ongoing disruptions to the health system and the impact of COVID containment measures on the determinants of health, efforts must be made to ensure that fertility services are not (further) deprioritised, and defunded within the health system. . Efforts must be made to ensure that fertility services are included in health policy reforms and other health systems interventions as part of the post-COVID-19 recovery. The new health system should be financed in a way that promotes equity and guarantees universal health coverage for infertility treatment. 14 This may require advocacy and renewed discussions on the ethical principles and procedures for the fair allocation and distribution of resources. 15 . Efforts must be made to address non-financial barriers which limit those who have traditionally been denied access to fertility services. This may require legal reform, to repeal laws and policies that criminalise, obstruct or undermine universal access to fertility services. It may also be necessary to revisit debates on suitability for parenthood and the socially acceptable family. This would require adopting a holistic intersectional approach to SRHR. 16 . Finally, efforts must be made to improve the quality of fertility services. They must become people-centred 17 and based on an integrated service delivery model, in which health workers collaborate to deliver seamless, comprehensive fertility services which are embedded within the wider context of sexual and reproductive health care. Post-COVID recovery provides a window of opportunity to build transformative health systems. We submit that quality fertility services can and should have a place within this transformation. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Clara Affun-Adegbulu http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-7398 Nandini D. P. Sarkar http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1171-073X Ibukun-Oluwa Abejirinde http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-0541 Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries Accelerate progresssexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher -Lancet Commission Essential packages of health services in 24 countries: findings from a cross-country analysis Infertility treatment financing in Nigeria In vitro fertilization: a case study in Kolkata, India Is global access to infertility care realistic? The walking egg project Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries Fertility treatments in the United States Regional legal and policy instruments for addressing LGBT exclusion in Africa. Sex Reprod Health Matters The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Human immunodeficiency virus and infertility treatment Court of Appeal overturns ruling ordering mentally disabled woman to have abortion. The Wall Street Journal American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Birmingham: American Society for Reproductive Medicine Universal health coverage for sexual and reproductive health Acceptable cost for the patient and society Women's health, men's health, and gender and health: Implications of intersectionality Patients from across Europe have similar views on patient-centred care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care