key: cord-0809913-el9yv7iq
authors: Micochova, Petra; Chadha, Ambika; Hesseloj, Timi; Fraternali, Franca; Ramsden, Jeremy J.; Gupta, Ravindra K.
title: Rapid inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by titanium dioxide surface coating
date: 2021-09-09
journal: Wellcome Open Res
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16577.2
sha: 9f9707f34aca705be70b0ce436ff0c49bca4e3a6
doc_id: 809913
cord_uid: el9yv7iq

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission occurs via airborne droplets and surface contamination. Titanium dioxide (TiO (2)) coating of surfaces is a promising infection control measure, though to date has not been tested against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Virus stability was evaluated on TiO (2)- and TiO (2)–Ag (Ti:Ag atomic ratio 1:0.04)-coated 45 x 45 mm ceramic tiles. After coating the tiles were stored for 2–4 months before use. We tested the stability of both SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped virions based on a lentiviral system, as well as fully infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus. For the former, tile surfaces were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped HIV-1 luciferase virus. At intervals virus was recovered from surfaces and target cells infected. For live virus, after illuminating tiles for 0–300 min virus was recovered from surfaces followed by infection of Vero E6 cells. % of infected cells was determined by flow cytometry detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein 24 h post-infection. Results: After 1 h illumination the pseudotyped viral titre was decreased by four orders of magnitude. There was no significant difference between the TiO (2) and TiO (2)–Ag coatings. Light alone had no significant effect on viral viability. For live SARS-CoV-2, virus was already significantly inactivated on the TiO (2) surfaces after 20 min illumination. After 5 h no detectable active virus remained. Significantly, SARS-CoV-2 on the untreated surface was still fully infectious at 5 h post-addition of virus. Overall, tiles coated with TiO (2) 120 days previously were able to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 under ambient indoor lighting with 87% reduction in titres at 1h and complete loss by 5h exposure. Conclusions: In the context of emerging viral variants with increased transmissibility, TiO (2) coatings could be an important tool in containing SARS-CoV-2, particularly in health care facilities where nosocomial infection rates are high.

Respiratory droplets are believed to be the major vehicle of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Droplets or other body fluids from infected individuals can contaminate surfaces and viable virus has been detected on such surfaces, including surgical masks, for hours, even days depending on different factors including humidity, temperature and type of surface [1] [2] [3] . One therefore infers that any external contamination of personal protective equipment (PPE) may last hours or even days.

Recently, there has been a further increase in SARS-CoV-2 cases globally, despite severe mitigation measures following the first wave in the first half of 2020. The new UK, Brazilian and South African variants (501Y.V1/V2/V3) have led to global anxiety and high levels of nosocomial transmission within hospitals are being observed in the 2020/21 UK winter despite universal adoption of wearing face masks, regular testing of staff and patients, and social distancing measures. It may well be that contamination of surfaces is now disproportionately contributing to transmission 4,5 .

Traditional forms of decontamination (such as alcohol-based sprays, quaternary ammonium compounds, and sodium hypochlorite and other chlorine-based compounds) require repeated applications. Photocatalytic surfaces, on the other hand, permanently oxidize, inactivate and destroy microorganisms under normal ambient lighting conditions 6 . A recent hospital study of titanium dioxide-coated surfaces demonstrated progressive lowering of the bacterial bioburden 7 . Moreover, the radicals are not considered to induce antimicrobial resistance 8 . TiO 2 is especially attractive because it is considered nontoxic to humans: titanium, coated with its oxide, is the most widely used material for implants 9 . TiO 2 is also exceedingly stable, unlike other photocatalysts such as zinc oxide and tungsten trioxide. Illumination of TiO 2 generates highly oxidizing free radicals that are known to have bactericidal and antiviral action against influenza and rotavirus 10-12 . SARS-CoV-2 has not hitherto been investigated.

293T and Vero E6 cells were cultured in DMEM complete (DMEM, Sigma D5030) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin (Sigma), 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma), and 10% fetal calf serum, GIBCO, Thermofisher). Vero E6 were a gift from Prof. Ian Goodfellow. 293T cells were a gift from Prof Greg Towers. ACE-2/TMPRSS2-expressing 293T cells were generated by transfecting plasmids expressing ACE-2/TMPRSS2 from a CMV promoter in pCDNA3.1 (Thermofisher Cat no: V79020) 13 .

Pseudotyped virus SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped HIV-1 luciferase particles were produced by transfection of 293T cells with 1ug pCAGGS-SARS-CoV-2 Spike expressing plasmid (NIBSC cat no: 100976), 1ug p8.91HIV-1 gag-pol expression plasmid (a gift from Prof Greg Towers) and 1.5ug pCSFLW (expressing the firefly luciferase reporter gene with the HIV-1 packaging signal -a gift from Prof Greg Towers) 14 . Plasmids were mixed in Optimem (GIBCO, Thermofisher Cat no: 31985062)) Following transfection in 10cm plastic petri dishes (Nunc cat no:150464), viral supernatant was collected at 48 and 72 h after transfection, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter (Millipore, cat no: HAWP04700) and stored at −80 °C. The 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 ) of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus was determined using the Steady-Glo luciferase (Promega cat no: E2550) assay system including a luminometer (Glomax Navigator Luminometer, Promega, cat no: GM2000).

Live SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2/human/Liverpool/ REMRQ0001/2020) used in this study was isolated by Lance Turtle (University of Liverpool), David Matthews and Andrew Davidson (University of Bristol). A SARS-CoV-2 virus stock was produced by infecting Vero E6 cells at MOI 0.01. Culture supernatant was collected 48 h post-infection. The titre of the stock was determined by adding tenfold serial dilutions of virus onto Vero E6 cells. 24 h post-infection cells were fixed by removing media and replacing with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Samples were stained for nucleocapsid protein using a monoclonal rabbit anti-Nucleocapsid antibody (1:1000, MA5-36086, ThermoFisher) and % infection determined by flow cytometry on a BD FACSCalibur instrument, with 10,000 cells were counted. SARS-CoV-2 virus titres were determined as infectious units per ml (IU/ml) as follows: (% infected cells) × (total number of cells) × (dilution factor) / volume of inoculum added to cells.

Ceramic tiles were wiped down with neutral disinfectant then coated with either a TiO2 based solution or with a combination of TiO2 and Ag using a spray gun (bespoke). The tiles were allowed to dry for 15 minutes. The spray gun was connected to an 11L air compressor (Makita). The nozzle orifice was 8 microns with pressure fixed at 12 PSI to atomise the coating. Virus stability was evaluated on the following surfaces: sterile untreated Sterilin standard Petri dish; TiO 2and TiO 2 -Ag (Ti:Ag atomic ratio 1:0.04)-coated 45 × 45 mm ceramic tiles (Invisi Smart Technologies UK Ltd). The coatings are transparent and colourless and therefore invisible to the human eye. After coating the tiles were stored for 2-4 months before use. Surfaces were exposed (610 lx, ambient laboratory light) for 1 h before the start of each experiment to ensure a steady state of radical generation. The same light was used during virus exposure, during which relative humidity was approximately 65% and temperature 21 °C (in a microbiological safety cabinet).

Tile surfaces were inoculated with 10 5 RLU of SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped HIV-1 luciferase virus onto the surface of the tiles at a dosage of 5 μl over 5 x 5 mm at time t = 0 and illuminated for up to 6 h. Three individual 5x5mm spots were used on the same tile. At

We have amended the intro, added details to methods and discussion but not results.

Any further responses from the reviewers can be found at the end of the article REVISED intervals virus was recovered from surfaces with 50uL of DMEM complete followed by infection of ACE-2/TMPRSS2-expressing 293T cells. Luminescence was measured using Steady-Glo Luciferase assay system (Promega) 48 h post-infection.

SARS-CoV-2 live virus inactivation. 6×10 6 IU/ml of SARS-CoV-2 virus was added onto the surface of the tiles at a dosage of 2 μl over 5 × 5 mm. Three individual 5x5mm spots were used on the same tile. After illuminating for 0-300 min virus was recovered from surfaces with 50uL of DMEM complete followed by infection of Vero E6 cells. % of infected cells was determined by flow cytometry detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein 24 h post-infection.

The main challenge is that laboratory inactivation experiments are necessarily carried out with large numbers of viruses, with which the inactivating material is brought into contact at the beginning of the experiment, and the decay of the entire virus population is measured 15 . What is of practical interest in the scenario of a coating designed to keep surfaces (e.g., in a hospital) free of viral (and bacterial) bioburden is how quickly an individual virus is inactivated. According to analysis of previously reported results for influenza virus inactivation 11 , the kinetics fit a convective diffusion transport model even in the absence of mechanical agitation, most likely due to almost inevitable thermal gradients 15 . The concentration of survivors is thereby predicted to follow a so-called exponential decrease, and plotting the logarithm of the number of survivors v. time should give a straight line, the slope of which is -k, the inactivation rate coefficient. The value of k can then be compared with the transport-limited fastest possible rate calculated from the size of the virus 15 .

We did not perform statistical analyses in this work.

After 1 h illumination the pseudotyped viral titre was decreased by four orders of magnitude ( Figure 1A 16 ). There was no significant difference between the TiO 2 and TiO 2 -Ag coatings. Light alone had no significant effect on viral viability. Next, we tested the ability of the coated tiles to inhibit fully infectious live virus. Coated and uncoated surfaces were exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Virus was harvested at the times indicated and used to infect Vero E6 target cells. SARS-CoV-2 was already significantly inactivated on the TiO 2 surfaces after 20 min illumination. After 5 h no detectable active virus remained ( Figure 1B 16 ) . Significantly, SARS-CoV-2 on the untreated surface was still fully infectious at 5 h post-addition of virus. TiO 2 -Ag appeared somewhat less effective than TiO 2 alone, but the difference was not significant.

Plotting the experimental data ( Figure 1B 16 ) as ln(titre) v. time ( Figure 1C 16 ) yields a disinfection rate coefficient k of (5.2 ± 0.6) × 10 -4 s -l , which corresponds to the transport-limited fastest possible rate estimated for SARS-CoV-2 approaching a disinfecting surface in water 15 . Hence we infer that the viruses arriving at the surface from the inoculum are essentially immediately inactivated. From our illumination conditions we estimate the generation rate of radicals as about 10 13 cm -2 s -l , 6 corresponding to about 800 radicals s -l over the area occupied by one virus at the surface, By extrapolating the data from the first four points to the assumed detection limit, it can be seen that very likely no detectable virus from the initial inoculum remained soon after 2 h exposure ( Figure 1C 16 ).

The potent extended anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect of titanium dioxide surface coatings is highly desirable in hospital settings where both patients and staff might be shedding viruses. An important advantage of these surfaces is that they can be activated by ordinary interior light and do not need UV irradiation, which is usually incompatible with simultaneous human presence. The coating has a rough surface with high local curvature that creates an absorption tail into the blue region of the visible spectrum 6 , overlapping the spectral output of ordinary interior lighting. This is sufficient to ensure an adequate rate of radical generation for effectively immediately inactivating viruses and other microorganisms arriving from the air or hand touches. Conversely, a limitation is that if a sudden very large contamination event occurred, particularly one that severely diminished the light reaching the photocatalyst, it might take impracticably long for the contamination to be eliminated.

Hence, in that case rough cleaning, even washing with water, should be used to remove the gross contamination. Further limitations to our study include the lack of a control tile that was unsprayed for the virus isolation work, and the fact that activity against droplets from infected individuals may be different as a result of other material such as mucus present. Controlled experiments with respiratory secretions would not be feasible.

The efficacy of the TiO 2 coating under typical hospital lighting makes it a promising candidate for enhancing the protection afforded by facemasks and other PPE, and well as surfaces likely to be contaminated and hence acting as reservoirs for transmitting infection if left untreated. The coatings would need only periodic re-application depending on the amount of wear, for example 6-12 monthly, and would be widely available in the future. Such interventions are increasingly critical in conditions where viral variants with increased transmissibility are the new norm 14,17-19 . throughput screening I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Reviewer Report 26 July 2021 https://doi.org/10.21956/wellcomeopenres.18269.r45067 © 2021 Xue X. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK In this research article, the authors demonstrated that titanium dioxide (TiO 2 )-and TiO 2 -Ag coating of surfaces can be a promising measure to reduce the fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 for future infection protection control. TiO 2 has been previously demonstrated to have bactericidal and antiviral action against influenza and rotavirus, but not yet studied on SARS-CoV-2, by generating oxidizing free radicals under light. This research compared the stability of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudo virus and infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus on coated and uncoated surfaces, and the results of which evidenced that TiO 2 -and TiO 2 -Ag coatings, compared to the uncoated control surfaces, effectively inactivated both SARS-CoV-2 pseudo and live viruses under ambient indoor light within hours. The authors indicated the potential of TiO 2 coatings as a tool in contribution to the control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public and health care settings. In this manuscript, the work has been well designed, clearly presented and concluded with relative adequate data.

Some minor comments are stated below:

There are a few different types of materials, e.g. metal-based, silicon-based, carbon-based, and polymers, that have been showing antiviral potentials. It would be good to briefly review the current literature on them and indicate the merit for investigating more on TiO 2coatings than others.

1.

The coating procedure was described in the methods section without further optimisation. Also, there are no further discussions on the validation and evaluation of the successful coatings on the surface. A series of surface characterisation techniques are therefore recommended, for example, ToF-SIMS and XPS to confirm the surface chemistries and their distributions after coating, and SEM to show the surface features and uniformity of the coating.

The virus stability was evaluated on both TiO 2 -coated and uncoated (control) surfaces. According to Fig. 1 B, polystyrene surface was used as the control substrate. However, as the coatings were applied on tiles (please specify its material) and no data have evidenced 3.

the successful coating (please see Comment 2), an uncoated tile surface would be a more appropriate control substrate compared to polystyrene.

In order to recommend on effective inactivation of virus on TiO 2 -coated surfaces for health care facilities in the future, it would be good to have more details of the light applied in this research as well as investigate more on different lights, in terms of their type, power, and applied distance to surfaces, in this study.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Antiviral materials, surface chemistry, polymer chemistry, biomaterials, high throughput screening I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Ravindra Gupta, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Reviewer 2: In this research article, the authors demonstrated that titanium dioxide (TiO 2 )-and TiO 2 -Ag coating of surfaces can be a promising measure to reduce the fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 for future infection protection control. TiO 2 has been previously demonstrated to have bactericidal and antiviral action against influenza and rotavirus, but not yet studied on SARS-CoV-2, by generating oxidizing free radicals under light. This research compared the stability of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudo virus and infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus on coated and uncoated surfaces, and the results of which evidenced that TiO 2 -and TiO 2 -Ag coatings, cultured virus and how this may have affected the inactivation of viral particles. Response: Mucous mainly contains mucin, a glycoprotein family, which would be photocatalytically oxidized to CO2 and H2O by TiO2. Partially oxidized intermediates may themselves be radicals that would damage and inactivate the viruses. Without detailed mechanistic investigations it is difficult to predict whether the mucous accelerates or retards virus inactivation. The ultimate outcome is not expected to be different, however. We have now commented on this in the discussion and thank the reviewer for this point.

No competing interests were disclosed.

Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1

PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Detection of air and surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms of infected patients

Screening of healthcare workers for SARS-CoV-2 highlights the role of asymptomatic carriage in COVID-19 transmission

Point of care nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients: A clinical validation trial and implementation study

The authors thank Saba Yussouf (Invisi Smart Technologies) for helpful discussions. We would also like to thank Nigel Temperton for the plasmids.

compared to the uncoated control surfaces, effectively inactivated both SARS-CoV-2 pseudo and live viruses under ambient indoor light within hours. The authors indicated the potential of TiO 2 coatings as a tool in contribution to the control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public and health care settings. In this manuscript, the work has been well designed, clearly presented and concluded with relative adequate data.Some minor comments are stated below:There are a few different types of materials, e.g. metal-based, silicon-based, carbonbased, and polymers, that have been showing antiviral potentials. It would be good to briefly review the current literature on them and indicate the merit for investigating more on TiO 2 -coatings than others.

Response: A formal review of literature would be lengthy. Hence we have focused on the tile based Ti02 coating.The coating procedure was described in the methods section without further optimisation. Also, there are no further discussions on the validation and evaluation of the successful coatings on the surface. A series of surface characterisation techniques are therefore recommended, for example, ToF-SIMS and XPS to confirm the surface chemistries and their distributions after coating, and SEM to show the surface features and uniformity of the coating.

Response: Unfortunately these experiments are beyond the scope of this report but are important as the reviewer points out. Please describe the time intervals and procedure of sampling to assess infectivity in detail (were different spots sampled on the same surface?) 2.Please clarify the nature of the control surface used. The text referred to an "uncoated surface" which I assumed would be ceramic, but the figure refers to polystyrene (is the latter an appropriate control surface?)3.Considering the potential of this surface coating: Please clarify a) how frequently the coating would have to be reapplied, b) what the cost of coating per square meter would be and c) how widely available TiO 2 is for use as a spray for surface coating.

Please comment on the difference of respiratory droplets that contain mucous vs free cultured virus and how this may have affected the inactivation of viral particles.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly ) . TiO 2 is photocatalytic under ambient light, producing oxidative radicals that inactivate infectious agents. The inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped virus and live SARS-CoV-2 cultures were assessed on ceramic tiles coated with either TiO 2 or TiO 2silver(Ag) by culturing viruses from these surface at different time intervals. The authors found that after 5 hours, no infective virus remained on the treated surface but it was still fully infectious on the untreated surface. The manuscript adds valuable novel data and provides an apparently practicable solution to coating surfaces in hospitals, which would result in surface disinfection under ambient light. The manuscript is overall well-constructed, accessible and well-written.

Please clarify how the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 is affected by natural vs incandescent vs fluorescent light bulbs?1.Response: Both natural (i.e. sunlight) and incandescent filament lamps approximate to black body radiators, albeit with different temperatures. The photocatalytic activity, which depends on the convolution of the incident light with the absorption spectrum of the TiO2, is therefore qualitatively the same for the two. The degree of activity (as measured e.g. by rate of inactivation of viruses) will simply depend on the actual irradiances --to a first approximation linearly. Fluorescent lighting has a different spectral distribution. For a good estimate of the degree of photocatalytic activity, one can simply take the irradiance in the near UV-violet-blue spectral range and compare it with that of the natural or incandescent source. Please describe the time intervals and procedure of sampling to assess infectivity in detail (were different spots sampled on the same surface?) This has now been described in the methods in more detail 1.Please clarify the nature of the control surface used. The text referred to an "uncoated surface" which I assumed would be ceramic, but the figure refers to polystyrene (is the latter an appropriate control surface?) 1.Response: We used plastic as a control surface in the absence of an uncoated tile. We have now stated this in the limitations section.Considering the potential of this surface coating: Please clarify a) how frequently the coating would have to be reapplied, b) what the cost of coating per square meter would be and c) how widely available TiO 2 is for use as a spray for surface coating.

Response: We have now specified in the paper that the coating would be re-applied every 6-12 months. The frequency depends on the adhesion of the coating and the degree of wear to which it is subjected. With no wear the coating lasts indefinitely. With moderate handtouching the coatings used in this work will typically last 6-12 months The cost is a few dollars per sq m and the coating is planned to be made widely available. The last two comments cannot really be put in the text as this is a changing area Please comment on the difference of respiratory droplets that contain mucous vs free 1.