key: cord-0808329-2mu83770 authors: Cereda, A.; Allievi, L.; Palmisano, A.; Tumminello, G.; Barbieri, L.; Mangieri, A.; Laricchia, A.; Khokhar, A.; Giannini, F.; Toselli, M.; Sangiorgi, G. M.; Esposito, A.; Aseni, P.; Lucreziotti, S.; Mafrici, A.; Carugo, S. title: Systematic review and meta-analysis on coronary calcifications in COVID-19 date: 2022-04-30 journal: Emerg Radiol DOI: 10.1007/s10140-022-02048-y sha: 3d6f8b8ec269d1c45e856cb46b4729cf2ee94892 doc_id: 808329 cord_uid: 2mu83770 Chest CT is valuable to detect alternative diagnoses/complications of COVID-19, while its role for prognostication requires further investigation. Non-pulmonary radiological findings such as cardiovascular calcifications could increase the predictivity of clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients beyond pulmonary involvement. Several observational studies have reported mixed results on the role of coronary calcifications in COVID-19 patients as a predictor of hospitalization, ventilatory support, and mortality. The purpose of the study is to systematically review the available evidence on the predictive role of cardiovascular calcifications in SARS-CoV2 disease. The meta-analysis confirms the prognostic significance of coronary calcifications on hospital mortality, and coronary calcifications (CAC ≠ 0) were associated with an OR for mortality of 2.19 (95% CI 1.36–3.52). CAC was neutral on respiratory outcomes, but it was associated with an increased trend of cardiovascular events. Coronary calcium appears as a promising biomarker imaging even in short-term outcomes (MACEs, hospital mortality) in a non-cardiovascular disease such as Sars-CoV2 infection. Further large studies are needed to confirm promising results of this imaging biomarker in non-cardiovascular disease. Chest CT has a potential role in the diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1] . In the early pandemic stages, chest CT was a rapid and reliable triage tool to refer patients requiring hospitalization to the COVID + or COVID − hospital units, when response times for virological tests were too long, to decrease congestion in the emergency departments. The diagnostic role has lost clinical importance due to the growing technological evolution and availability of molecular and antigenic tests. Meanwhile, the role of CT imaging in assessing prognosis, triaging patients, and identifying acute pulmonary complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is still relevant. CT imaging also may be used to stratify the severity of lung involvement, to evaluate the need for hospitalization, and to predict clinical outcomes [2] . There are several non-pulmonary radiological findings on thoracic imaging that are predictors of outcomes, such as pleuro-pericardial effusion, enlargement of the pulmonary artery, and thromboembolic manifestations [3] . Among these, the role of cardiovascular calcifications (coronary, valvular aortic, and thoracic aortic) emerged as a promising biomarker imaging to stratify the clinical evolution of the disease and predict clinical outcomes. Considering the impact of cardiovascular disease on COVID-19 outcomes, the integration of chest CT imaging with biomarker imaging such as calcium score could play an ever-larger role in the assessment of COVID-19-related issues [4] [5] [6] . Cardiovascular calcifications and coronary artery calcium (CAC) indirectly reveal plaque burden and are a biomarker of atherosclerosis. Both SCCT and Society of Thoracic Radiology jointly recommend the routine reporting of CAC score in routine non-contrast CT chest irrespective of indication for early detection of CAD and future research potential [7] . Cardiovascular and especially coronary calcifications can be measured using non-gated non-contrast chest CT. Various methods have been used for the evaluation of CAC (Agatston, calcium volume, semi-quantitative vessel score, and visual score). Although the method of CAC scoring is different between quantitative and the visual method, final categories, risk prediction, and management are similar. CAC is typically quantified using the Agatston score, a sum of the attenuation (in Hounsfield units) and area of all CAC lesions in the coronary arteries. The Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) classifies patients based on either visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery calcification. These scoring systems provide a simple method to indicate the overall severity of disease to the referring physician. Cardiovascular calcifications are an emerging biomarker in the cardiovascular field. Coronary artery calcium is a highly specific marker of subclinical atherosclerosis that can be quantified using non-contrast computed tomography [8] . A CACS of 0 can down-stratify a patient's risk, whereas a CAC > 100 identifies increased cardiovascular risk. Higher CAC burden is strongly associated with incident sudden cardiac death beyond traditional risk factors, particularly among primary prevention patients with lowintermediate risk [8] . The calcium score is proving to be an interesting marker also in the oncology field and in the outcomes of respiratory diseases, where cardiovascular health influences survival [9] . Recent cohort studies have shown a CACS 100-300 as a sign of increased cancer risk. CAC scoring as part of lowdose CT lung cancer screening can be used as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events [10] . The study was aimed to systematically analyze the available data on cardiovascular calcifications in patients with Sars-CoV2 infection. A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and was registered on Prospero (ID 307,133). An online search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases on 25th May 2021 to detect the studies to include in the meta-analysis. As search terms, we included "cardiovascular calcifications AND COVID-19," "coronary artery calcifications AND COVID-19," "coronary artery calcium AND COVID-19," and related terms. We also looked at the reference list of the included papers to detect additional eligible studies. Studies were included if they analyzed the relationship between cardiovascular calcifications (intended as coronary artery, aortic valve and/ or thoracic aorta calcifications) and different types of outcomes (e.g., intubation and/or mortality, etc.). No limitation to language, sample size, or publication date was applied. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for data selection. The eligibility of the retrieved items was independently assessed by two authors (LA and AC) and there was no disagreement. In the identification and screening phase, 22 reports were identified. Due to a lack of adequate CAC reporting and duplicates, only 11 studies were eventually included. The data extraction was performed by two reviewers (LA and AC); the extracted data included (1) sample characteristics (age, female sex, arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus); (2) presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) (defined as > 1 mm2 or density > 130 Hounsfield units), values of coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and prevalence of visual coronary artery calcium score and coronary artery calcium data and reporting system (CACS-DRS) categories; and (3) prevalence of COVID-19 outcomes (hospital survival, intubation, major adverse cardiac events-including acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and stroke-and mortality). The CAC scoring (Agatston, volume or visual) between the different studies was reassessed independently by two reviewers. We used the GRADE criteria to assess the quality of evidence for each study. The studies were classified in very low, low, moderate, and high quality according to study design, risk of bias (assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), consistency, directness, precision, publication bias, effect, confounders, and spurious effect (Tables 1) . The outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 disease depend on the emergency status of the health systems of the included studies, the period of the study (with worse outcomes in the first waves of the pandemic), and the selected population. In the analysis on cardiovascular calcifications, only coronary calcifications were included due to the lack of data on aortic valve calcifications (reported in one study) and on thoracic aortic calcifications (reported in two studies but not comparable due to methodological limitations). Based on the available outcomes of the included studies, the following end-points were assessed: (1) Impact of coronary calcifications (expressed differently in different studies) on mortality (2) Impact of coronary calcifications on the respiratory outcome "Orotracheal intubation" (3) Impact of coronary calcifications on MACE (defined as a composite endpoint of acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and pulmonary embolism) Quantitative data are reported as mean and standard deviation or median value with interquartile range. The categorical data are reported in percentages. The available data were analyzed using OpenMetanalyst, a completely open-source, cross-platform software for advanced meta-analysis and with STATA version 13. The results are expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval. Meta-analysis pooling of odds ratios was performed with the random-effects inverse-variance model. For the age, sex, and diabetes covariates, meta-regression was performed again with the random-effects model. The heterogeneity of the results was evaluated with the I squared index reported as a percentage. The association between categorical variables (calcium score and outcomes) was expressed in terms of odds ratios (OR). After an examination of titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and having excluded all the items which did not respect inclusion and exclusion criteria and duplicate records, 11 papers were included in the meta-analysis [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] . The characteristics of each study are shown in Table 1 . The quality of evidence assessment for each study is shown in the last column. None of the studies reached the highest level of quality, in part explained by the absence of randomized trials conducted to date on this topic. The systematic search and meta-analysis included 2875 patients from 11 studies (see Table 1 ) reporting CAC scoring and hospital outcomes of patients. Only 6 out of 11 studies had a sample size greater than 100 patients. The mean age of the population included in the metaanalysis was 62 years, 35% of patients were female, 57% were hypertensive, and 31% were diabetic (data in line with the COVID-19 literature of hospitalized patients). 628 of 2775 patients died, with an average mortality of 20.7% (95% CI 12.5-28.9; I^2 p value < 0.001) (Fig. 1) . Mortality of the included studies ranged from the lowest value of 4.3% (Dillinger et al.) to the greatest value of 45.7% in the study by Fervers et Al. The I 2 statistic (p value < 0.001) of the mortality rate underlines the heterogeneity of the populations examined. In meta-regression analyses for mortality, the mean age of the studies was positively associated with mortality (p value 0.016) ( Fig. 2A) . The sex covariate including all studies did not appear to be associated with mortality (Fig. 2C, D) . The prevalence of diabetes, available in only 4 studies, was positively associated with a higher mortality rate (Fig. 2B) . Patients with coronary calcifications (CAC > 0 vs. CAC = 0 patients) had a mortality OR of 2.19 (95% CI 1.36-2.52). Patients who did not have coronary calcium on chest CT had a 54% lower mortality risk (Fig. 3) . CAC of 0 was a strong negative risk factor and "derisks" patients. COVID-19 patients without coronary calcifications were nearly 50% less likely to die (OR 0.46 0.28-0.74) (Fig. 3) . Patients with severe calcifications (defined as a CAC > 400mm3) had an even greater risk of death (OR 2.49 1.15-5.41) regardless of orotracheal intubation (OR 0.94 0.22-4) (Fig. 4) . Respiratory outcome (orotracheal intubation) was independent of coronary calcifications (Fig. 5 , OR 1.08 0-75-1.55). Patients with severe calcifications (CAC > 400 mm3) had an increased risk of cardiovascular events (acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism and stroke) with an OR of 1.73 (1.04-2.88) (Fig. 6) . Analyzing mortality according to the CAD score-DRS, it is seen that with increasing severity of calcifications, there was an increase in mortality that reached 45.8% in patients with CAC-DRS 3 (Figs. 7-8) . In all mortality analyses, coronary calcifications (assessed as presence/absence or in quantitative terms) were correlated with an increased risk of mortality from COVID-19. The severity of coronary calcifications (expressed by the CAC-RAD classification in Fig. 9 ) was associated with higher mortality rates. The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that CAC is associated with mortality of COVID-19 patients; it is not related to the respiratory outcome of orotracheal intubation. Patients with more coronary calcific burden tend to have higher mortality, and the presence of CAC is associated with cardiovascular events (acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and stroke). In the various papers, various CAC score measurements (qualitative, quantitative, categorical quantitative, or comparisons through the median value of the population) were examined. This measurement heterogeneity limits the metaanalytic comparisons of the different studies, weakening the final result of the meta-analysis. Fig. 3 Meta-analysis including studies with mortality for patients with coronary calcifications and without (zero coronary calcium). The graph above shows that coronary calcifications (coronary calcium score > 0) increase mortality due to COVID-19. The same data can be interpreted in the graph below in terms of the protective effect of the zero coronary calcium score on mortality in patients with CAC values often invalidate the predictive significance of other cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension and diabetes). On the contrary, in the stratification of the asymptomatic patient with intermediate risk for CAD (as the recommendation of the American guidelines with evidence class IIa), the value of the CACS is incremental and does not eliminate the significance of the other risk factors in the multivariate analyses. This statistical overlapping of the calcium score with other risk factors is physiopathologically explainable because CAC is a cumulative marker of vascular damage caused by exposure to other cardiovascular risk factors. Probably the significance of this overlapping can be explained from a statistical point of view with the collinearity between calcium score and cardiovascular risk factors. Despite the collinearity bias [6] , the CAC was predictive of death in the paper by Giannini et al. independently from age, sex, creatinine, and lung interstitial involvement [16] . It is also necessary to take into consideration that the populations are heterogeneous and representative of different pandemic Fig. 4 Plot with the outcomes (mortality and intubation) in patients with coronary calcium score > 400. The above plot shows the mortality, the one below the intubation There are three possible explanations for the predictivity of CAC death in COVID: (1) The first cardiovascular hypothesis is that CAC is a more sensitive cardiovascular marker than other anam-nestic variables (probably weakened by suboptimal data collection in retrospective studies). Coronary calcium score, being a cumulative marker of cardiovascular damage, includes all risk factors [22] . The CAC can therefore be considered as a cumulative measure of cardiovascular damage with different degrees of severity even in the asymptomatic patient. In a disease that has a marked cardiovascular tropism, having a low calcium score probably confers some sort of resilience to Sars-CoV2 infection. It is also presumed that the patient with cardiovascular calcifications has a greater activation of the RAAS system which favors viral replication and vascular damage. (2) We can then suppose the existence of a second hypothesis that sees the calcium score as a marker of fragility [23] . Cardiovascular disease is associated with frailty, and frailty increases the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. Older patients, with more comorbidities, have higher CAC values and are more exposed to complications of SARS-CoV2 disease, with higher mortality. The patient with a higher calcific burden is frailer and more exposed to type II myocardial damage secondary to respiratory hypoxia [24] . In a disease with cardiovascular tropism, cardiovascular calcifications could indirectly represent the cardiovascular health of the individual (independently of other anamnestic and laboratory variables), and their quantification allows evaluating the cardiovascular resilience to Sars-CoV2. (3) The third hypothesis is the "immunological" one. Since CAC is related to epicardial adipose Tissue (EAT), we can assume that these patients have a higher baseline cardiometabolic inflammatory phenotype. These patients have a more pronounced basal inflammatory response that exposes them more to the cytokine storm induced by Sars-CoV2 [20] . It is well known that atherosclerotic disease is also associated with immune system dysregulation and a chronic inflammatory state. Interestingly, in predominantly respiratory disease, CAC is neutral in terms of respiratory outcomes such as orotracheal intubation. The association between MACEs and CAC on the other hand is easier to explain. Patients who have the most coronary plaque burden are also those most exposed to plaque rupture with multiple coronary and stroke syndromes. The pathogenesis of the pulmonary thromboembolic event is instead sought in a greater inflammatory/coagulative response of patients with elevated CAC [12] . Sars-CoV2 (like any infectious state) can favor the erosion/rupture of plaques and favor thromboembolic events and therefore increase the probability of cardiovascular events. The CAC, despite methodological limitations, nevertheless appears as a promising imaging marker in COVID-19. It is an easy-to-use imaging biomarker, does not take too long to measure, and could be an added value compared to pulmonary findings. However, the validity of this marker will have to be validated by the large numbers of clinical trials (where often the basal lung CT was an inclusion criteria). The CAC score values in drug trials could also tell us whether patients with coronary calcifications respond better or worse to specific therapies (such as heparin, steroids, or monoclonal antibodies). The calcium score, in the perspective of cardiovascular risk stratification, is probably "the elephant in the room" and it is often overlooked in radiological reports. CAC is the most reliable element in cardiovascular risk stratification in terms of precision of predictive ability and CAC of 0 is a strong negative risk factor and "de-risks" patients. If CAC is predictive of death in a new and not classically cardiovascular disease, let us think about its potential innovative applications in cardio-oncology and patients with end-stage nephropathy [25] . The non-cardiovascular application of this bioimaging marker could reclassify the risk profile of millions of patients who perform pulmonary CT every year for other clinical reasons. From the following meta-analysis of 11 studies, the role of coronary calcium score appears evident in terms of mortality prediction despite bias and heterogeneity. Coronary calcium in the studies included in this systemic review and meta-analysis was significantly associated with mortality. It was found to be neutral in terms of respiratory outcomes and showed a trend towards a greater number of MACEs. However, routine reporting of the CAC score on non-contrast chest CT, regardless of clinical indication (COVID-19 lung disease staging, pulmonary embolism, or other respiratory complications), promotes early diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis and stratifies the risk of COVID-19 patients [26, 27] . Chest CT in the emergency department for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia Chest CT in COVID-19 at the ED: Validation of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT Severity Score: A Prospective Chest CT-derived pulmonary artery enlargement at the admission predicts overall survival in COVID-19 patients: insight from 1461 consecutive patients in Italy Imaging in COVID-19-related myocardial injury Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risk by coronary artery calcium scores and percentiles among older adult males and females Coronary calcium score and cardiovascular risk SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology Coronary artery calcium for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: the coronary artery calcium consortium Relation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Risk of Cancer (from a Danish Population-Based Follow-up Study in Patients Who Underwent Cardiac Computed Tomography) Coronary artery calcium can predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer Qualitative and quantitative chest CT parameters as predictors of specific mortality in COVID-19 patients Coronary Calcium Score in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients Coronary Artery Calcification and Complications in Patients With COVID-19 Calcification of the thoracic aorta on low-dose chest CT predicts severe COVID-19 Subclinical coronary artery disease in COVID-19 patients Coronary and total thoracic calcium scores predict mortality and provides pathophysiologic insights in COVID-19 patients Coronary artery calcification in COVID-19 patients: an imaging biomarker for adverse clinical outcomes Utility of visual coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated thoracic CT in predicting clinical severity and outcome in COVID-19 Coronary artery calcification heralds adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for Covid-19 Coronary artery calcification and epicardial adipose tissue as independent predictors of mortality in COVID-19 Coronary calcium scoring assessed on native screening chest CT imaging as predictor for outcome in COVID19: An analysis of a hospitalized German cohort Frailty and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19: a call to arms? Coronary artery calcium scoring: new insights into clinical interpretation-lessons from the CAC consortium Coronary plaque as a replacement for age as a risk factor in global risk assessment The hidden interplay between sex and COVID-19 mortality: the role of cardiovascular calcification The authors declare no competing interests.