key: cord-0807533-wpy15gdy
authors: Akay, Tankut; Kaymaz, Cihangir; Rüçhan Akar, Ahmet; Orhan, Gökçen; Yanartaş, Mehmed; Gültekin, Bahadır; Şırlak, Mustafa; Kervan, Ümit; Gezer Taş, Serpil; Biçer, Murat; Yağdı, Tahir; İspir, Selim; Doğan, Rıza
title: Raising the bar to ultradisciplinary collaborations in management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
date: 2021-07-26
journal: Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg
DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.21284
sha: 8a5821fc9d3f54dd5b4cb89f275ebb9b0e43f4a6
doc_id: 807533
cord_uid: wpy15gdy

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is an underdiagnosed and potentially fatal subgroup of pulmonary hypertension, if left untreated. Clinical signs include exertional dyspnea and non-specific symptoms. Diagnosis requires multimodality imaging and heart catheterization. Pulmonary endarterectomy, an open heart surgery, is the gold standard treatment of choice in selected patients in specialized centers. Targeted medical therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty can be effective in high-risk patients with significant comorbidities, distal pulmonary vascular obstructions, or recurrent/persistent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy. Currently, there is a limited number of data regarding novel coronavirus-2019 infection in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and the changing spectrum of the disease during the pandemic. Challenging times during this outbreak due to healthcare crisis and relatively higher case-fatality rates require convergence; that is an ultradisciplinary collaboration, which crosses disciplinary and sectorial boundaries to develop integrated knowledge and new paradigms. Management strategies for the "new normal" such as virtual care, preparedness for further threats, redesigned standards and working conditions, reevaluation of specific recommendations, and online collaborations for optimal decisions for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients may change the poor outcomes.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a group of diseases that may interfere, involve, and contribute to various cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. [1] [2] [3] [4] The clinical classification is consisted of five groups according to clinical presentations, pathological findings, pathogenetic and hemodynamic characteristics, and treatment strategies. [1, 2, [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a progressive, potentially life-threatening obstructing vasculopathy considered a long-term complication of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), leading to significant mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. [1, 2, 6, [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] It is a potentially curable form of PH and classified as Group 4 in the PH classification and shown in Table 1 and abbreviations in Table 2 . [1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, [18] [19] [20] In this disease, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increases, resulting in the gradual progress of the disease, followed by right ventricular (RV) failure and death. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] Mechanism in CTEPH depends on segmental obstruction of pulmonary blood flow, high shear stress in non-occluded areas, and progressive PH due to vascular remodeling in distal vessels. [16, 17] Non-operable CTEPH has been associated with a five-year survival of 30%. [15] Early diagnosis is challenging. [8, 20] Late diagnosis have a negative impact on prognosis. [8] The diagnosis is made in the presence of the following criteria: (i) (with or without a prior episode of PTE), at least segmental perfusion defects in ventilationperfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy should be obtained with intraluminal filling defects in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and/or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and/or pulmonary angiography; (ii) finalizing the diagnosis of PH with a right heart catheterization, resting mean PAP (mPAP) should be equal or greater than 25 mmHg, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure should be lower than 15 mmHg; and (iii) these findings should be obtained after effective anticoagulant therapy for at least three months. [1] [2] [3] [21] [22] [23] Sometimes the thrombi in the pulmonary arteries may not resolve, but the patient may still not suffer from PH at rest either. This disease has similar symptoms and perfusion defects with CTEPH, but without PH at rest and defined as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTED). [1, 2, 24] There are robust data regarding satisfactory results with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for CTEPH. However, currently, we do not have sufficient data to conclude about a definitive evolution of CTED. There are no clear guideline recommendations for CTED, [1, 2, 4, 6, 22, 23] unlike the precise guidelines for PH and PTE. [1, 22] Currently, limited data from surveys are available regarding COVID-19 infection in patients with PH and CTEPH. [24] Patients with CTEPH having multiple comorbidities are distinctively at a higher risk for severe novel coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) infection. Relatively higher case-fatality rates in comparison with the general population are alarming and require reevaluation of specific recommendations. Convergence (ultradisciplinary collaboration), which crosses disciplinary and sectorial boundaries to develop integrated knowledge and new paradigms, may help to solve too many gray zones to be considered. [25] [26] [27] EPIDEMIOLOGY Studies have proven that CTEPH is an underdiagnosed disease. [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] In a prospective follow-up study, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic CTEPH after an acute episode of PTE was 1% at six months, 3.1% at one year, and 3.8% at two years. [28] A recent study showed that approximately 3.2% of all survivors who had an acute episode of PTE would develop CTEPH. [30] The International Prospective Registry data including 679 newly diagnosed consecutive patients with CTEPH from Europe and Canada showed that 75% of CTEPH patients had a history of PTE, and 56% of them had a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). [20] It is estimated from the registries that the incidence of CTEPH is thought to be 3 to 30 per million in the general population. [4, 31] The incidence of CTEPH in the United States and Europe ranges from 3 to 5/100,000. [29] While the incidence of CTEPH increases in the fourth to sixth decade, it is rare in childhood. [2, 20, 28] A lack of awareness and ambiguousness of symptoms results in misdiagnosis. Furthermore, a significant number of cases may be asymptomatic with a honeymoon period after PE. [21, 32] Screening is recommended within two years following a PE episode. [33] In Turkey, it is estimated that 800 individuals per year are suffering from CTEPH, but only 200 of them can have a chance for an optimal treatment. In the Registry on Clinical Outcome and Survival in Pulmonary Hypertension Groups (SIMURG), CTEPH accounted for 19% of the enrolled 1,501 patients with PH from 20 adult cardiology PH centers. [34] The

International Prospective Registry data showed that 32% of CTEPH patients had thrombophilic disorders, including elevated Factor VIII and lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies. [20, 35] Moreover, this group of patients is more likely to have blood groups A, B, and AB, which may be associated with an increased level of Factor VIII. The relationship between thrombophilia and PTE is well known. However, the association of CTEPH and several disorders, including protein C and protein S, the G20210A mutation of prothrombin, and hyperhomocysteinemia, has not been fully understood, yet. [40] Despite that, routine thrombophilia screening, including antiphospholipid antibodies, may be useful. Other clinical risk factors are genetic predisposition, a history of splenectomy, infected ventriculoatrial shunts for the treatment of hydrocephalus, hypothyroidism and thyroid hormone replacement, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, chronic osteomyelitis, malignancy, and infected pacemaker lines. [28, 36] The prognosis is poor with these conditions. [28, [36] [37] [38] The CTEPH incidence after the COVID-19 pandemic and coronavirus challenge in patients with existing CTEPH remains to be resolved. A recent prospective study during the pandemic reported a high prevalence of PE in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission. [39] In the near future, the impact of COVID-19 on the epidemiology of CTEPH would be clearer.

The pathophysiology includes intraluminal thrombus organization, fibrotic scar tissue-like stenosis resulting from incomplete thrombus resolution following PE, and subsequent vascular remodeling of unaffected pulmonary vessels. [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] Previous studies have described that the organized thrombi are tightly attached to the pulmonary arterial medial layer and can form complete occlusion or form different grades of stenosis, webs and bands. [45, 46] Chronic intravascular scar formation, high shear stress in non-occluded areas, and progressive PH due to microvascular remodeling in distal pulmonary vessels lead to progressive PH and finally RV dysfunction. [17, 42, 47] Catheter studies in healthy individuals have demonstrated a normal mPAP at rest of about 14.0±3.3 mmHg. [48] The task force has proposed the inclusion of an mPAP of >20 mmHg as the threshold and PVR of ≥3 WU in the definition of pre-capillary PH. [30] Hemodynamically increased mPAP results in increased RV wall tension, RV hypertrophy and dilatation and, at later stages, RV failure in untreated patients. The main cause of vascular disease in patients with CTEPH can be considered the remodeling of the vascular wall after thromboembolism and the increased vascular resistance in the following period. Thus, RV failure is the main cause of death in CTEPH.

The cardinal symptom is progressive exertional dyspnea. [1, 2, 3, 9] However, the diagnosis is often delayed or missed due to non-specific symptoms and a lack of awareness. Non-specific symptoms, such as exercise intolerance, chest discomfort, fatigue, and depression can be potentially misleading. [10, 11] As the disease progresses, signs of RV failure, including jugular venous distension, hepatomegaly, ascites, and peripheral edema, may be seen. [7, 49] Occasionally, hypoxemia, syncopal episodes during effort, lightheadedness, stress angina, hemoptysis, or chest pain may be present.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension should be kept in mind for patients with a history of VTE in the presence of progressive exertional dyspnea. [9, 10, 21] Typically, clinical history reveals a suspicion of previous PE or DVT of the lower limbs in more than half of the patients with CTEPH. [7, 9] With effective anticoagulation, resolution is expected within three to six months. [7] The persistence of symptoms more than six months should alert the physicians.

Any patient with a history of PTE and progressive dyspnea is a potential candidate for CTEPH. A high index of suspicion is essential for early diagnosis. [48, 49, 50] Physical examination may reveal prominent RV impulse, a split of the second heart sound, a RV, S4 gallop, a right-sided S3, and varying degrees of tricuspid regurgitation.

The International Prospective Registry data reported a median time interval of 14.1 months between the first symptoms and CTEPH diagnosis. [20] However, early detection of CTEPH has a paramount importance on survival rates. [8, 28] Furthermore, an accurate diagnosis requires multimodality imaging. [21, 50] Chest radiography and pulmonary function tests may help in excluding possible airway or parenchymal lung diseases. [7] Right ventricular enlargement, a prominent pulmonary trunk, and hilar pulmonary arteries can be detected on chest X-ray.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) findings may show RV strain and hypertrophy, including P-pulmonale, right bundle branch block, T-wave abnormalities, and rightaxis deviation. [1, 51, 52] Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal prob-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) correlate with the severity of RV dysfunction and hemodynamic outcome. [53] A simple, non-invasive diagnostic model was developed by Klok et al. [52] based on ECG assessment and NT-proBNP measurements with a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86-98%) and a specificity of 65% (95% CI: 56-72%).

The current guidelines recommend echocardiography as the first-line non-invasive screening tool to detect PH and RV dysfunction. [1, 2, 16] Echocardiographic evaluations include estimation of pulmonary arterial systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures, quantifiable tricuspid regurgitant signals, RV pressure size, and function, septal shift, right atrial size, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, and pericardial effusion. Echocardiographic imaging can also rule out left-sided valvular lesions, left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, or intracardiac shunts. Echocardiographic evaluation in symptomatic patients with a suspicion of PH aims to estimate probability of PH, and has been based on two-step assessment comprising measurement of tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity by Doppler, and assessment for supportive findings suggestive of PH. Following the assessment for PH probability and the presence or absence of risk factors for PAH and CTEPH determines the decision for heart catheterization to confirm PH diagnosis. [1, 2, 9, 18, 20, 23, 53, 54] 

The V/Q scintigraphy is the first-line screening imaging method to rule out CTEPH. [1, 2, 7, 50, 55] A normal V/Q scan effectively eliminates CTEPH diagnosis with a sensitivity of 90 to 100% and a specificity of 94 to 100%. [1, 50, 55] Lobar and segmental perfusion defects are typical in CTEPH patients. An example of V/Q scintigraphy is shown in Figure 1 demonstrating diffuse perfusion defects in the right lung middle and lower lobe. False-positive V/Q scans may be misleading with pulmonary artery sarcoma, large-vessel pulmonary vasculitis, extrinsic compressive lesions, pulmonary microvasculopathy.

Spiral CT is an excellent imaging modality with a sensitivity of 85 to 90% to visualize occlusion of pulmonary arteries, eccentric filling defects compatible with thrombi, recanalization, webs, or bands. Moreover, post-stenotic dilatation or aneurysms and calcification in the thrombus can be identified using this method. Dual-energy CT, which has been successfully applied in recent years, provides valuable information regarding perfusion defects. [9, 19, 55] Pre-and postoperative CT scans and the operation material of a demonstrative patient are shown in Figures 2 and 3 . 

The MRI is a promising and evolving modality without radiation exposure in CTEPH diagnosis and evaluating cardiac remodeling both before and after PEA. [56] It not only allows diagnosis of both acute and chronic thromboembolism, but also enables the qualitative and quantitative determination of right and left ventricular function. [57] 

Digital subtraction pulmonary angiography is considered the gold standard for characterizing vessel morphology, surgical operability or applicability of interventional treatments in CTEPH. [2, 9, 23, 24, 44, 48] If the V/Q scan is suggestive of CTEPH, pulmonary angiography is required for accurate diagnosis and anatomical guidance for surgery. Selective pulmonary angiography is helpful for visualization of filling defects, web, ring-like or total obstructive lesions in pulmonary artery branches. It is also quite accurate in the identification of distal obstructions.

Cardiac catheterization has a critical role in the diagnostic algorithm of PH and CTEPH to establish the specific diagnosis and determine the severity of PH. It includes measurement of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, RV and right atrial pressures, serial blood sampling for oxygen saturation, and calculation of cardiac output and index, and PVR. Intracardiac shunting should be also ruled out. [1, 2, 9] Furthermore, coronary angiography for obstructive lesions and extrinsic compression of left main coronary artery by the aneurysmal or dilated pulmonary artery, and selective bronchial angiography should be considered during heart catheterization. The cardiologist's perspective prefers simultaneous pressure tracing for right and left-sided circulatory units to evaluate the changes in systemic pressure on the pulmonary arterial wedge and mean pressures. Therefore, heart catheterization rather than right heart catheterization seems to be the more appropriate definition for this procedure.

The 6-Minute Walking Test (6-MWT) is another diagnostic modality that has become widely used in both follow-up and clinical studies, and is a simple and repeatable test to measure the exercise capacity of patients. [1] [2] [3] [4] 11] 

If perfusion disorder is detected when there is no problem in respiratory function test, PH should be considered in the differential diagnosis, and if the patient has a history of PTE, CTEPH should be considered. [5] The diagnostic algorithm is summarized in Figure 4 . [1, 2, 3, 58, 59] Non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism (i.e., tumors, parasites, foreign materials) should be excluded in the differential diagnosis. Rare sarcomas and Echinococcosis-related hydatidosis should be considered, and these entities can be distinguished clinically from CTEPH by specific features. [60] TREATMENT A critical point is to make the decision based on an interdisciplinary approach consisting of different disciplines such as pulmonology, cardiology, cardiovascular surgery (cardiothoracic surgery in certain locations), radiology, nuclear medicine, and anesthesia and intensive care. [9] Curative treatment is PEA [1, 2, 3, [9] [10] [11] [12] [42] [43] [44] performed under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). [1] [2] [3] [9] [10] [11] [12] [42] [43] [44] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] This surgery has become an accepted and curative treatment modality worldwide with the increase of awareness and can be applied with low mortality with the help of recent advances in imaging and diagnostic methods, advances in myocardial protection techniques in cardiovascular surgery, advances in supporting systems for postoperative care in intensive care unit settings, and advances in medical treatment. [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] It is well known that the learning curve for diagnosis and management of CTEPH is an essential factor such as the commitment and the technical background of the center. [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] As cardiovascular surgeons, we must focus not only on how to perform a proper endarterectomy, but also on fundamental training and management of the problems in cardiac surgery principles, such as the management of CPB and DHCA, weaning from CPB in the presence of RV failure due to PH, and also the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in challenging cases. [61, 67] Therefore, the importance of experienced and committed inter/ultradisciplinary teams who can provide a second or third opinion should not be neglected. This fact has emerged as a reality, particularly in the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related travel restrictions. [26] The severity of the patients' symptoms, correlation between accessibility of thrombus and the degree of PH and RV failure are important criteria to consider while Diagnosis confirmed by CTEPH expert center operability assessment by a multidisciplinary CTEPH team deciding on the operation. The level and accessibility of obstruction are the most important surgical criteria. An "haute couture" approach has paramount importance similar to all areas of cardiovascular surgery. Life expectancy and individual expectations may vary depending on several factors. [1, 2, 9, 20, 23] Although increased PVR or advanced RV failure is not an absolute contraindication to surgery, these patients may have some challenges in the postoperative period. In some cases, additional medications or mechanical circulatory support systems may be needed. Patients with PVR values of 1,000 dyn·s/cm 5 or ≤12 Wood units are defined as relatively low-risk patients. [9] [10] [11] If the thrombus extends to the main branches of the pulmonary artery, lobar arteries and even segmental arteries, surgical removal of chronic thrombus material is considered safe. Removal of chronic clot material from the distal segmental or sub-segmental arteries may be difficult and, in some centers, this group of patients may be considered inoperable. In this case, a second opinion should be taken from another experienced center.

Patient-specific comorbidities and risk factors, long-term risk analysis, technical difficulties (hostile thorax such as previous sternotomy, chest anomalies, previous coronary artery bypass grafting) are the other factors that can play a role in the decision-making process. [15, 31, 83] However, two issues need to be considered with a special caution. First, patients with parenchymal lung damage (patients with severe emphysema or lung parenchymal damage) would experience severe respiratory failure in the postoperative period and, therefore, surgery may not be the right choice. Hence, it may not be beneficial to perform surgery to perfuse a non-ventilated lung. Second, surgery for patients with severe comorbid conditions such as end-stage lung disease or malignancy should be considered non-beneficial. [1, 2, 3, 9, 20, 23] Several risk models are described for PH patients (e.g., COMPERA), and we, as the authors of this paper, prefer the risk-benefit ratio described by Jenkins et al. [43] 

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with RV failure may cause hemodynamic instability during anesthetic induction and in the pre-CPB period, and associated comorbidities (pulmonary, hepatic) may affect the actions and metabolism of anesthetic drugs. Therefore, anesthetic care for patients needs special attention in every step. During the CPB period, the anesthesia team must ensure that adequate perfusion, cerebral oxygenation, and hypothermia for DHCA are employed. Very close collaboration with the anesthesiology team has a vital importance to manage either specific problems of the operation (i.e., residual PH, pulmonary edema, pulmonary bleeding, and RV failure) or various metabolic and cardiovascular issues related to hypothermic circulatory arrest.

A median sternotomy is required for CPB and surgical accessibility to both lungs. The IVC and superior vena cava (SVC) are encircled. The CPB is established with standard aorta-bicaval cannulation and a left ventricular vent through the right upper pulmonary vein. A second vent can be placed into the pulmonary artery, if necessary. [9, 20, 23] The cardioplegia cannula is inserted into the aortic root, and the circulation should be discontinued by cooling to 20ºC. The DHCA is probably the most important part of the operation to provide a clear, bloodless field of vision. Another crucial point is the identification of the correct plane of dissection in the segmental and sub-segmental branches of the pulmonary artery.

It is important to stay in the same plane circumferentially to avoid losing the plane of dissection, as it is advanced into the segmental and sub-segmental branches.

The critical point is to be able to perform a complete endarterectomy without any residue. [43, 44, 54, 68] Particularly in the distal part, it is vital that the endarterectomy material should not be cut, not be ripped off, and again with a meticulous dissection, removing the material as en bloc with its tail has a vital importance to prevent residual PH. [43, 44, 54, 58] If the disease has a very distal localization, another DHCA period can be necessary. After completing endarterectomy, the arteriotomy is closed with 5-0 or 6-0 Prolene, usually with a double running fashion. Concomitant cardiac pathologies such as coronary artery disease or valvular heart disease can be treated surgically during the warming period after total circulatory arrest. [1, 2, 20, 23] The most common procedure is closure of patent foramen ovale. [1, 2, 3, 9] Some essential points and significant landmarks of the operation are shown in Figure 5 .

The surgical classification was made according to materials extracted and there are five levels. [9, 20, 23] The types of diseases are summarized in Figure 6 and the pathological images are demonstrated in Figure 7 .

Another important question has emerged about brain protection during DHCA. This question was . Levels of pulmonary endarterectomy material. Type 1 disease describes the obstructive material present in main pulmonary arteries. In this group, a special group in which only one of the main pulmonary arteries is obstructed and the remaining lung is not perfused is called Type I C. Type 2 disease is characterized by intimal thickening and fibrosis and the presence of organized thrombus starting at the lobar artery level. In Type 3 disease, fibrosis starts from the distal segmental arteries, and intimal webs, and thickening of the intima with or without clots are seen. Surgical interventions are required for each segmental artery. Type 4 disease is the group that clot starts at the sub-segmental level and is considered advanced distal disease. answered after Pulmonary Endarterectomy Cognitive (PEACOG) study, neurocognitive functions of patients who underwent DHCA and selective perfusion were compared, and no significant difference was found between the two groups. [68] Weaning from CPB The snares are released from SVC and IVC. Air is removed from the cardiac chambers and the aorta is unclamped. The patient is warmed to 37ºC and vent cannulas are removed followed by a mandatory meticulous hemostasis, particularly focused on the suture lines of both pulmonary arteries. Pericardial patch can be sutured over the bleeding suture lines along the pulmonary arteries to control the bleeding. Reinforcing stitches along the suture lines should be avoided to prevent tears on pulmonary arteries, particularly in patients with postoperative PH. [1, 2, 4, 9, 20, 23] Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during surgery, which is a non-invasive monitoring method, provides extremely important information regarding the hemodynamic follow-up and treatment processes. After PEA, RV parameters reflecting RV EF such as global functional area change (FAC) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) can be quantitatively measured.

Complications related to open heart surgery such as postoperative bleeding, mediastinitis, atrial arrhythmias, central nervous system complications, renal problems, recurrence, laryngeal, and phrenic nerve injuries can be seen after the operation. Another important complication is massive pulmonary hemorrhage which can be potentially fatal. [9, 20, 23] Gentle dissection in the right plane is the main principle in preventing such an injury; however, the damage may occur, particularly in fragile arteries. The entire operating team needs to be aware of this complication and treatment options. Flexible bronchoscopy devices, surgical adhesives, and bronchial blockers must be ready in the operating theatre. After finishing the endarterectomy, a bubble test should be performed before weaning off CPB. The identification of bleeding before restarting the circulation is important to repair the disruption easily; otherwise, it may be difficult to repair and a pulmonary resection option may be also considered. [69] After PEA, patients with residual PH are natural candidates for reperfusion injury, pulmonary edema, and RV failure. Fluid replacement should be done carefully in the postoperative period. Nitric oxide may be a good option to decrease PVR. Milrinone can be another option for RV support. Pressure control, positive end-expiratory pressure, and inverse ratio ventilation are helpful strategies to maintain an acceptable ventilation-perfusion matching and decreasing the risk of further damage. However, if pulmonary edema and RV failure persist and the strategies mentioned earlier fail, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) is a useful treatment modality to decrease the RV volume overload and improve cardiac output, leading to better oxygen transport. It must be always remembered that ECMO is one of the devices that should be found in CTEPH centers. [9, 61, 70] 

What about the tricuspid valve? Repair or not to repair? Other concomitant procedures Tricuspid valve regurgitation in various degrees may be detected in CTEPH patients undergoing PEA. As cardiovascular surgeons, our intention is usually to perform a tricuspid valve repair. However, tricuspid valve repair is unnecessary, unless there is a serious structural problem involving the leaflets or chorda tendinea. After PEA, RV remodeling resolves and, therefore, we believe that tricuspid regurgitation secondary to annular dilatation should be omitted. [2, 31, 32, 56, 70] 

Traditionally, diuretic agents, oxygen therapy, and lifelong anticoagulant therapy are important parts of classical medical therapy. In anticoagulant therapy, the target international normalized ratio (INR) should be between 2.0 and 3.0. Anticoagulant therapy prevents pulmonary artery thrombosis and recurrent thromboembolism. We do not have enough data on the usage of direct-acting oral anticoagulants, despite the accumulated information that has increased in the medical treatment of DVT in recent years. Specific treatment for PH in CTEPH should be considered mainly in three patient groups: [1] [2] [3] 7, 9] (i) patients who are anatomically unsuitable for endarterectomy, since the lesion is placed very distally. This decision should be confirmed by a second opinion; (ii) patients with persistent PH after PEA; and (iii) patients who are deemed to be very risky as a result of the decision of the Multidisciplinary Council due to accompanying comorbid conditions (severe pulmonary parenchymal disease, morbid obesity, hepatic or renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hostile thorax due to previous mediastinal surgery). Patients who are unwilling to undergo surgery can be considered in this group. [2, 9, 71, 72] Riociguat treatment has emerged as an effective therapeutic option additionally to classical medical therapy in CTEPH. [71] [72] [73] It is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, acts on nitric oxide receptor, used orally, and the only approved drug for inoperable cases or treatment of recurrent/persistent PH after surgery. The CTEPH diagnosis confirmed by the expert center Operability assessment by a multidisciplinary CTEPH team starting dose is 0.5 mg t.i.d. By controlling the side effects, titrating and increasing the dose, the optimum dose of 2.5 mg t.i.d. should be reached. [2, 9, [71] [72] [73] In the literature, there are studies conducted with other agents, although they have not been approved yet. [74, 75] Discussions on bridging treatment are still in the gray zone, and the results of multi-center studies are waiting. [9] BALLOON PULMONARY ANGIOPLASTY (BPA)

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty has been considered an emerging treatment modality in small, segmental, and sub-segmental vessels in high-risk surgical patients due to multiple comorbidities or unwillingness of patients for PEA or residual CTEPH following PEA. The rationale beneath this percutaneous treatment is based on the presence of web, ring-like narrowing, or total occlusion amenable to balloon dilations. The role of BPA in CTEPH and treatment algorithm is summarized in Figure 8 .

The Japanese experience for BPA seems to provide robust data for efficacy and safety issues of this method in a selected subgroup of cases with CTEPH. The fundamental principles of different BPA strategies are to initiate balloon dilations with smaller balloon sizes than vessel diameters and multiple dilations for target lesions and target branches in each session, and to increase the balloon size at sequential sessions until achieving a satisfactory drop in PA pressures and PVR.

The risks for reperfusion pulmonary edema and vessel perforation are the most dreadful complications. [76 -80] The National Hospital Organization, Okayama Medical Center reported that mPAP reduced to below 25 mmHg threshold in 85% of patients with sequential BPA sessions within six months. After BPA, the 10-year survival rate was reported as 89.7%. [80] Following these encouraging results of the Japanese experience, BPA programs have been also initiated in many countries. [77] The Turkish BPA program was launched under the leadership of Dr. Matsubara in 2017, and was followed by at least five PH/CTEPH centers capable of performing BPA with satisfactory efficacy and safety results. Despite this enthusiasm, BPA should not be regarded as a treatment strategy that is an alternative to PEA, and decisions for eligibility to BPA should be based on the consensus of the multidisciplinary CTEPH teams. [2, 16, 24] A recent study examined the changes in NT-proBNP in patients undergoing BPA for inoperable CTEPH and showed that NT-proBNP levels decreased after BPA, providing valuable evidence for the efficiency of this treatment modality. [81] As a late-breaking abstract, the Riociguat versus Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Non-operable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (RACE) study was an open-label randomized, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of riociguat versus BPA in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve patients with inoperable CTEPH in 20 centers. [82] Patients aged 18 to 80 years, with inoperable CTEPH and eligible for BPA, without a history of specific PH therapies were enrolled in the study. Change in PVR from baseline to Week 26 was set as the primary endpoint, whereas changes in the 6MWT, functional class (FC), NT-pro BNP, and Borg Dyspnea Scale scores were secondary endpoints. The BPA significantly improved PVR compared to riociguat (BPA vs. riociguat: PVR reduction 40%, ratio of geometric means, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.53 to 0.69, p<0.0001), FC and NT-proBNP. There was no significant difference in the 6MWT between the two groups. However, BPA was associated with a higher number of serious adverse events. It seems that further randomized-controlled trials and prospective, longitudinal CTEPH registries including inoperable CTEPH are required to draw a firm conclusion on this subject. [83] In conclusion, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is critical, but a curable disease with pulmonary endarterectomy and there are medical options for inoperable patients. Collaboration with other disciplines has of utmost importance. Increasing awareness and establishing new expert and committed centers would provide benefits to this patient population.

ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): Updated Recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference

İstanbul: Bayçınar Tıbbi Yayıncılık

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

The changing landscape of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension management

Update on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Evolving therapeutic approaches for operable and inoperable disease

Determinants of diagnostic delay in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Results from the European CTEPH Registry

Kronik tromboembolik pulmoner hipertansiyon

Pulmoner hipertansiyon. Ankara: Antıb Basımevi

Pulmoner hipertansiyon Tanı ve Tedavi Uzlaşı Raporu. İstanbul: Logos Yayıncılık

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Evolving spectrum of treatment for CTEPH

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Improved survival in medically treated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

ERS Statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Controversies, uncertainties and future research on the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in pediatric patients

Outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy for treatment of extreme thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): Results from an international prospective registry

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the

Outcome of pulmonary endarterectomy in symptomatic chronic thromboembolic disease

An overview of the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension

COVID-19 in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A reference centre survey

How to deal with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTEPH) during the COVID-19 pandemic: Too many gray zones to be considered

Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (TSCVS) Proposal for use of ECMO in respiratory and circulatory failure in COVID-19 pandemic era

Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism

An epidemiological analysis of the burden of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the USA

Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: A contemporary view of the published literature

Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A current understanding

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension--not so rare after all

Multicentre observational screening survey for the detection of CTEPH following pulmonary embolism

Preliminary results from a nationwide adult cardiology perspective for pulmonary hypertension: RegiStry on clInical outcoMe and sUrvival in pulmonaRy hypertension Groups (SIMURG)

Thrombotic risk factors in pulmonary hypertension

Predictors of outcome in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Medical conditions increasing the risk of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Epidemiology and risk factors for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID 19 at the time of hospital admission

The pathophysiology of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Research progress on the pathogenesis of CTEPH

Current concepts in the pathogenesis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary endarterectomy in the management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Technical advances of pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary arterial bands and webs: An unrecognized manifestation of organized pulmonary emboli

Pulmonary vascular lesions occurring in patients with chronic major vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Microvascular disease in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A role for pulmonary veins and systemic vasculature

Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: A systematic review

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Predictive values of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing pulmonary hypertension

A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism

Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for haemodynamic outcome and mortality following pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Technique and outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy surgery

Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension

Reverse right ventricular remodeling after pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Utility of magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate restoration of the right ventricle

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Pearls and pitfalls of diagnosis

Pulmonary endarterectomy. Patient selection, technical challenges, and outcomes

External validation of a simple noninvasive algorithm to rule out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism

Intracardiac and pulmonary artery hydatidosis causing thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Venovenous extracorporeal life support after pulmonary endarterectomy: Indications, techniques, and outcomes

Operative classification of thromboembolic disease determines outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy

Successful surgical intervention in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary embolectomy and thromboendarterectomy in seven cases

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in pediatric patients: Report of three cases

Kronik tromboembolik pulmoner hipertansiyonda pulmoner tromboendarterektomi

Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy

Circulatory arrest versus cerebral perfusion during pulmonary endarterectomy surgery (PEACOG): A randomised controlled trial

Airway bleeding during pulmonary endarterectomy: The "bubbles" technique

A successful surgical treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism after endovenous radiofrequency ablation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridging

Riociguat for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A long-term extension study (PATENT-2)

Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Bosentan for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: BENEFiT (Bosentan Effects in iNopErable Forms of chronIc Thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Macitentan for the treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (MERIT-1): Results from the multicentre, phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Is Europe behind?

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Results of a multicenter registry

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for monitoring after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Late Breaking Abstract -Balloon pulmonary angioplasty versus riociguat for the treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Results from the randomised controlled RACE study

The United States chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension registry: Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal study

We are grateful for the mentorship in starting new CTEPH programs in Turkey, provided by Dr. Madani, Dr. Mayer, Dr. Jenkins, and Dr. Matsubara. This review article is intended to merge the knowledge generated by multiple disciplines, and we thank the members of all fields for their outstanding work.

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.