key: cord-0801810-agqwnrgj authors: Sir Karakus, Gozde; Tastan, Cihan; Kancagi, Derya Dilek; Yurtsever, Bulut; Tumentemur, Gamze; Demir, Sevda; Turan, Raife Dilek; Abanuz, Selen; Cakirsoy, Didem; Seyis, Utku; Ozer, Samed; Elibol, Omer; Elek, Muhammer; Ertop, Gurcan; Arbak, Serap; Acikel Elmas, Merve; Hemsinlioglu, Cansu; Kocagoz, Ayse Sesin; Hatirnaz Ng, Ozden; Akyoney, Sezer; Sahin, Ilayda; Ozbek, Ugur; Telci, Dilek; Sahin, Fikrettin; Yalcin, Koray; Ovali, Ercument title: Preliminary report of preclinical efficacy and safety analysis of gamma-irradiated inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates, SK-01 version 1 and OZG-3861 version 1 date: 2020-09-04 journal: bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.04.277426 sha: bbab7624b2d17c51a543b775b84b4564483cadca doc_id: 801810 cord_uid: agqwnrgj The COVID-19 outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an unprecedented health crisis since there is no coronavirus vaccine in the market due to the novelty of this virus. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have become very important to reduce morbidity and mortality. At this point, inactivated vaccines are important because the straightforward process of existing infrastructure used for several licensed human vaccines can be used for SARS-CoV-2. Inactive vaccines provide an antigenic presentation similar to that when they encounter invasive virus particles of the immune system. In this study, in vitro and in vivo safety and efficacy analyzes of lyophilized vaccine candidates inactivated by gamma-irradiation were performed. Our candidate OZG-3861 version 1 (V1) is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccine, and SK-01 version 1 (V1) is the GM-CSF adjuvant added vaccine candidate. We applied the candidates intradermal to BALB/c mice to assess the toxicity and immunogenicity of the OZG-3861 V1 and SK-01 V1. Here, we report our preliminary results in vaccinated mice. When considered in terms of T and B cell responses, it was observed that especially the vaccine models containing GM-CSF as an adjuvant caused significant antibody production with neutralization capacity in absence of the antibody-dependent enhancement feature. Another finding showed that the presence of adjuvant is more important in T cell response rather than B cell. The vaccinated mice showed T cell response upon restimulation with whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or peptide pool. This study encouraged us to start the challenge test using infective SARS-CoV-2 viruses and our second version of gamma-irradiated inactivated vaccine candidates in humanized ACE2+ mice. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and spread globally, causing coronavirus disease 2019 . The number of COVID-19 cases has increased at a shocking rate around the world, pushing the limits of "the second wave". As of 1 August, the total confirmed cases have reached 17,853,488 and the death toll has risen to 684,765 (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/). There is still no specific treatment for . Several therapies such as various drugs, convalescent plasma, and cellular therapies are under investigation but the efficacy of these treatments is still yet to be improved. In this condition, the urgent need for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was responded by 160 candidates (23 clinical, 137 preclinical) in development (World Health Organization, 2020) and some of these candidates reported hopeful results (Gao et al., 2020; Jackson et al., 2020) . We have previously published our study on the isolation and propagation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in culture from COVID-19 patients (Taştan et al., 2020) . In this study, in vitro and in vivo analyzes of our lyophilized vaccine candidates inactivated by gamma-irradiation were performed. Our candidate OZG-3861-01 is a purified inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccine, and SK-01 is the GM-CSF adjuvant added vaccine candidate. We conducted a preclinical safety and efficacy analysis of the candidates that were applied intradermally to BALB/c mice to assess the toxicity and immunogenicity of OZG-3861-01 and SK-01. Here we report our preliminary results including both B cell and T cell response in vaccinated groups. This study encouraged us to start the challenge test using SARS-CoV-2 viruses and our gamma-irradiated inactivated vaccine candidates in humanized ACE2+ mice. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal cavity samples were obtained from four patients who were diagnosed as COVID-19 by Real-Time PCR in Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University Atakent, and Maslak Hospitals. In vitro isolation and propagation of SARS-CoV-2 from diagnosed COVID-19 patients were described in our previous study (Taştan et al., 2020) . The study for SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing was approved by the Ethics Committee of Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University (ATADEK-2020/05/41) and informed contents were obtained from the patients. For the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples to have clinical significance, it is extremely important to comply with the rules regarding sample selection, taking into the appropriate transfer solution, transporting them to the laboratory, and storing them under appropriate conditions when necessary (Taştan et al., 2020) . In Figure 1 , the production of a candidate vaccine for gamma-irradiated inactivated SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated. Isolation and propagation were performed from the samples taken on the 7th day in which the viral load was predicted to be the most in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. During virus replication, 90% confluent Vero cells in cell culture flasks with a larger surface area were gradually cultured with virus-containing supernatant. The supernatants obtained at the end of the production were pooled and concentrated 10-15 times. To remove cellular wastes in the supernatant, diafiltration was performed. Finally, the concentrated virus was frozen before 50 kGy gamma-irradiation processes. Two different formulations with or without 25ng/ml GM-CSF (CellGenix rhGM-CSF) as adjuvants were prepared by the lyophilization stage. Thus, the end products were made available for pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo analyzes. Viral RNA extractions were performed by Quick-RNA Viral Kit (Zymo Research, USA) in Acıbadem Labcell Cellular Therapy Laboratory BSL-3 Unit according to the manufacturer's protocols. Library preparation was performed by CleanPlex SARS-CoV-2 Research and Surveillance NGS Panel (Paragon Genomics, USA) according to the manufacturer's user guide. For the construction of the library, The CleanPlex® Dual-Indexed PCR Primers for Illumina® (Paragon Genomics, USA) were used by combining i5 and i7 primers. Samples were sequenced by Illumina MiSeq instrument with paired-end 131 bp long fragments. The data that passed the quality control were aligned to the reference genome (NC_045512.2) in Wuhan and a variant list was created with variant calling. The data analysis was described in detail in our previous study (Ozden Hatirnaz Ng et al., 2020) . Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) measurements were carried out for SARS-CoV-2 titer in suspension by using The NanoSight NS300 (Amesbury, UK). Samples were diluted with distilled water 1:10 ratio and transferred to Nanosight cuvette as 1 ml. Measurements were performed at room temperature with 5 different 60-second video recording. Dynamic light scattering (DSL) measurements of SARS-CoV-2 were carried out using a Zetasizer nano-ZS from Instruments (Malvern, UK). Samples were diluted with distilled water 1:10 ratio and transferred to a polystyrene cuvette (10 mm). The volume of the analyzed preparations was 1 ml. Measurements were performed at room temperature with a He-Ne laser (633 nm, 10 mW) and scattered light detection at 173°. Measured data were processed using the Dispersion Technology Software version 5.10. Total RNA isolations from SARS-CoV-2 were carried using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Kits (Zymo Research, USA), and concentrations were determined using Qubit fluorometer with the Qubit RNA HS Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). SARS-CoV-2 specific RT-PCR was performed with Bosphore Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Detection Kit (Anatolia Geneworks, Istanbul) along with Orf1ab and E gene primers. The RT-PCR analysis was performed in Roche Lightcycler 96. Total RNA isolations were performed from SARS-CoV-2 specimens using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Kits (Zymo Research, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with the QuantiVirus SARS-CoV-2 Test Kit (Diacarta) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quantitative RT-PCR analysis was analyzed in Roche Lightcycler 96. Viruses were inactivated and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 2.5 h. One drop of glutaraldehyde-treated virus suspension was placed on the carbon-coated grid for 10 min. Ultrathin sections (60nm) were stained according to the negative staining procedure. Ultrathin sections stained with 2% uranyl acetate were examined under a transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific-Talos L120C) and photographed. LC-MSMS protein analysis was performed at Acibadem Labmed Laboratory, Istanbul. ONAR data acquisition mode was applied by a Waters Xevo G2-XS high-resolution mass spectrometer. Tryptic peptides were generated by overnight digestion with trypsin followed by reduction and alkylation steps with DTT and IAA, respectively, and fractionated by a 90 min reverse-phase gradient at 500 nL/min flow rate on an HSS T3 (Waters-186008818) nano column. LC-MSMS data was searched against the NCBI RefSeq sequence database for protein identification. Progenesis QIP software was used for protein identification (Waters v4.1) 3µg of lyophilized inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate in 100 µl apyrogenic water was inoculated into %90 confluent Vero cells at 37C. The supernatant of this culture was replenished with fresh Vero cell culture every 3-to-5 days up to 21 days of incubation. As a negative control, only 100 µl apyrogenic water was inoculated into Vero cells and cultured for 21 days with the same treatments. At the end of the incubation, the final supernatant was collected, centrifuged at 2000G for 10 min to remove cell debris. Next, the supernatants were concentrated 10x with 100kDa Amplicon tubes. The concentrated samples were tested in the xCelligence RTCA system in a dose-dependent manner as 10 -1 to 10 -6 to determine the cytopathic effect. Female or male 11-months-old BALB/c mice were housed in Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Laboratory Animal Application and Research Center (ACUDEHAM; Istanbul, Turkey) for 7-day toxicity and 21-day toxicity and efficacy tests. For 34-day efficacy tests, female or male 3-months-old BALB/c mice were housed in Yeditepe University Experimental Research Center. All animal studies received ethical approval by the Yeditepe University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Yeditepe-HADYEK). To determine the 21-day immunogenicity (n=3/group) and 7-day (n=4/group) or 21-day toxicity (n=3/group) of inactive vaccine produced in Acibadem Labcell Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Istanbul, Turkey, on day 0 mice were inoculated with the dose of 3 µg/100 µl (4,2x10 6 SARS-CoV-2 viral copy per microgram) adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted vaccine intradermally and with apirogen water in the control group. In two other groups, a booster dose of 3 µg/100 µl adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted vaccine was administered on day 15 intradermally in addition to day 0. Survival and weight change were evaluated daily and every week respectively. To evaluate the fast response toxicity, on day 0 mouse was inoculated with the dose of 3 µg/100 µl adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted vaccine intradermally and with apirogen water in the control group (n=4/group). Survival and weight change were evaluated on days 0, 3, and 7. Blood samples were collected just before the sacrification for hemogram and biochemical analysis at day 7. For long term toxicity and immunogenicity, blood samples were collected just before the sacrification on day 21 or day 34 for serum preparation to be used in preclinical in vitro studies. Mice treated with the vaccine candidates were sacrificed on day 21 or day 34 postimmunization for analysis of B and T cell immune responses via SARS-Cov-2 specific IgG ELISA, IFN ELISPOT, and cytokine bead array analysis. Mice treated for both toxicity and efficacy tests were sacrificed on day 7 or day 21 postimmunization for histopathology analysis. Dissected organs including the cerebellum, lungs, liver, kidneys, skin, intestine, and part of the spleen of sacrificed mice were taken into 10% buffered formalin solution before they were got routine tissue processing for histopathological analysis. Tissue tracking was performed firstly in NBF 10% for 1 hour and then in alcohol from 60% to absolute gradually for 1 hour/each alcohol concentration. The tissue tracking was finalized in Xylene and Paraffin for 1 hour/each. Blocking of tissues was performed by embedding in paraffin and turned into blocks. Sections with 3-4 µm thickness were taken from paraffin blocks. Next, the staining was performed following several procedures including deparaffinization, hydration, hematoxylin stage, acid alcohol phase, bluing, eosin phase, dehydration, transparency step, and closing with the non-aqueous closing agent. Before the sacrification, blood samples were collected from the whole group of mice. The serum was collected with centrifugation methods. Serum samples were stored -40 C. To detect the SARS-COV-2 IgG antibody in mouse serum SARS-COV-2 IgG ELISA Kit (Creative, DEIASL019) was used. Before starting the experiment with the whole sample, reagent and microplates pre-coated with whole SARS-CoV-2 lysate should be brought on room temperature. As a positive control, 100 ng mouse SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 monoclonal antibody was used which is commercially available (E-AB-V1005, Elabscience). Serum samples were diluted at 1:64, 1:128, and 1:256 in a sample diluent, provided in the kit. Anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Horseradish peroxidase enzyme (mHRP enzyme) was used as a detector. After incubation with the stoping solution, read at 450nm with the microplate reader (Omega ELISA Reader). TCID50 (Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose) of SARS-CoV-2 was determined by incubating the virus in a serial dilution manner with the Vero cell line (CCL81, ATCC) in gold microelectrodes embedded microtiter wells in xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) instruments (ACEA, Roche) for 8 days. Neutralization assay was performed as 1:64, 1:128, and 1:256 dilutions of mice serum were pre-incubated with a 10X TCID50 dose of SARS-CoV-2 at room temperature for 60 min. Infective active SARS-CoV-2 virus to be used in neutralization tests was titrated in the RTCA system and the dose of TCID50 was determined. It was decided to use 10 times more than the dose of TCID50 in the following neutralization tests. Next, the preincubated mixture was inoculated into the Vero-coated cells which were analyzed in real-time for 120 hours (totally, 145 hours). Cell analysis was normalized to the value at 24th hour of culturing before culturing with serum-SARS-CoV-2 sample conditions. Normalized cell index shows the proliferation and viability of the adherent cells (the higher cell index means the higher viability and proliferation). The neutralization ratio was determined by assessing percent neutralization by dividing the index value of serum-virus treated condition wells to the cell index value of untreated control Vero cells (normalized to 100%). For example, for the sample of 1:128 adjuvant+ double-dose, the normalized cell index value was 0,651 while the index value of control well was 0,715. At this time point, the cell index value of only virus incubated wells was 0. This gave 91,4% virus neutralization. This calculation was performed for each mouse in the group and the mean of the virus neutralization was determined. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy donor blood was isolated using the Ficoll-Paque solution. PBMCs were cultured in the T-300 flask for 2 hours at 37 C. Non-binding cells (T cells) were discarded by withdrawing the medium after the incubation. Following washing, flask-attached cells were mostly monocytes that were cultured in xCellegence plates for 24 hr before incubation with mice serum and SARS-CoV-2. Mice serum dose of 1:256 was preincubated with a dose of 10x TCID50 SARS-CoV-2. After 48 hours of incubation on the monocytes, qRT-PCR was performed by scraping off the supernatant and cells to assess the SARS-CoV-2 copy number per ml. MACSPlex Cytokine 10 kit (Miltenyi Biotec) was used for the Cytokine bead array following the manufacturer's protocol. To study the CBA test from serum samples, serum samples were diluted 1: 4 and tested. Samples were collected into sample tubes, and flow analysis was done. Flow analysis was performed with the MACSQuant Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec). Mouse Spleen T cells were centrifuged with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) at 300xg for 10 min. Pellet was resuspended in TexMACs (Miltenyi Biotech, GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) cell culture media (%3 human AB serum and 1% Pen/Strep). 500,000 cells in 100 µl were added into microplate already coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for mouse IFN-γ. Either 3µg/ 100 µl inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or 1000 nM SARS-CoV-2 virus Peptivator pool (SARS-CoV-2 S, N, and M protein peptide pool) (Miltenyi Biotech, GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) were added into each well including mouse spleen T cells. The microplate was incubated in a humidified 37°C CO 2 incubator. After 48-72 h incubation, IFN-γ secreting cells were determined with Mouse IFNγ ELISpot Kit (RnDSystems, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The spots were counted under the dissection microscope (Zeiss, Germany). 500,000 cells isolated from mouse spleen were incubated with 1000 nM SARS-CoV-2 virus Peptivator pool (SARS-CoV-2 S, N, and M protein peptide pool) (Miltenyi Biotech, GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) in a humidified 37°C CO 2 incubator. After 48-72 h incubation, the mouse cytokine profile was analyzed using the supernatant of the cultures using the MACSPlex Cytokine 10 kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Also, to determine T cell activation and proliferation, the restimulated cells were stained with the antibodies including CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD25 as an activation marker (Miltenyi Biotec). The Cytokine bead array and the T cell activation and proportions were analyzed using the MACSQuant Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec). In the bar graphs, normally distributed data were tested using student's t-tests for two independent means. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison between two groups of non-normally distributed data. Statistical analysis of the presence or absence of toxicity including inflammation in the tissue sections was performed using the Chi-squared test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics software. No outliers were excluded in any of the statistical tests and each data point represents an independent measurement. Bar plots report the mean and standard deviation of the mean. The threshold of significance for all tests was set at *p<0.05. NS is Non-Significant. Most of the therapeutic options available to treat COVID-19 are based on previous experience in the treatment of SARS-and MERS-CoV (Cyranoski, 2020) . The main reason for the lack of approved and commercially available vaccines or therapeutic agents against these CoVs may be the relatively high cost and long production time (Cyranoski, 2020) . Multiple strategies have been adopted in the development of CoV vaccines; most of these are recombinant adenovirusbased vaccines and immuno-informatics approaches used to identify cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and B cell epitopes (Bijlenga, 2005; . Unlike the vaccine obtained with the recombinant protein cocktail of the virus, the whole of the virus in the vaccine candidates may enable to produce a vast amount of the immunoglobulin molecules that can recognize the virus antigens better and more specific. With our straight forward manufacturing protocol of the whole inactivated lyophilized SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, two different formulations with or without GM-CSF as adjuvants were prepared (Fig. 1) . Thus, the end products were made available for preclinical in vitro and in vivo safety and efficacy analyzes. While evaluating the appropriate isolate for the inactive vaccine form, viral genome sequencing obtained from four patients was performed and a variant list was created ( Table 1) Pooling was performed to obtain the final product with SARS-CoV-2 isolates which were sequenced genome. RT-PCR identification of the isolates was performed as stated in our previous publication. The dry end product obtained after inactivation and lyophilization by gammairradiation was diluted to 3ug / 200 µl and analyzed to measure particle count, size, and density. As a result of these analyzes, the average size of the particles in SK-01 V1 was 139.3 +/-5.6 nm ( Fig. 3A and 3B ) and the average size of the particles in OZG-3861 V1 was determined to be 144 nm +/-51.8 nm ( Fig. 3C and 3D ). However, the particle density in this size range was calculated to be 91.9% +/-2.5% (Fig. 3D) . The number of viral particles per dose was found to be 2.6x10 8 +/-2.61x10 7 . These results have shown us that the virus particles in the final product largely retain their compact structure. However, negative staining and transmission were analyzed with an electron microscope to display the compact structure of the virus particles in the final product (Fig. 4A) . In addition to RT-PCR analysis, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific protein sequences including Replicase polyprotein 1ab and Non-structural protein 3b) was confirmed by proteome analysis on the final product, figure 4B shows eluted peptides between m/z 50-2000 along a 90 min reverse-phase gradient elution. As a result of these analyzes, it has been decided that vaccine candidates have been made final products for use in toxicity and efficacy studies. To test the reliability including 7-day and 21-day toxicity of the vaccine candidates, intradermal administration was performed to the mouse groups as a single dose with adjuvant (SK-01 V1) and single-dose without adjuvant (OZG-3861 V1) (Fig. 5A) . As a result of a one-week follow-up, no significant weight change was detected in groups compared to the control mouse group (Fig. 5B ). However, there was no significant difference in CBC analysis (red blood cell, RBC; white blood cell, WBC; hemoglobin; HGB and platelet rates) ( Fig. 5C and 5D) . However, when the study groups were compared with the control, there was a significant increase in gammaglobulin and related protein increase in the vaccine group containing adjuvant (Fig. 5E) . In toxicity analyzes, Ca, ALT, and LDH values did not differ significantly between the groups (Fig. 5F , 5G, and 5H). In the histopathological analysis om day 7, no different situation was observed in the samples of spleen, liver, lung, intestine, hippocampus, kidney, and skin among the groups (Fig. 5I ). In the examination of cerebellum tissues, no statistically significant pathology compared to the control group was observed (Fig. 5I) . In the adjuvant negative single dose (OZG-3861 V1) group, dense Purkinje cells were observed. However, this density did not appear to be significant (p >0.05) compared to the control group (Fig. 5I) . These toxicity analyzes encouraged us to start an in vivo efficacy and dose study with both adjuvant SK-01 V1 and OZG-3861 V1 vaccine candidates without adjuvant in mice. Histopathologic analysis on day 7 of the lung, jejunum of intestine, liver, spleen, cerebellum, hippocampus, kidney, and skin. Purkinje neurons (arrow). The thin double-headed arrow is space, the thick arrow is a picnotic cell. Next, we determined long-term toxicity analysis at day 21. As a result of histopathology analysis, a significant pathological finding was not observed in the lung, liver, jejunum of intestine, spleen, cerebellum, hippocampus, kidney, and skin tissues (Fig. 6A & 6B) . Numerous foci of megakaryocytes (marked by a star) and trabeculae (marked by arrow) were determined in the histological sections of the spleen in all groups (Fig. 6A) . Cerebellum sections were studied in brain tissues obtained from mouse groups. In particular, there is no statistically significant difference in the shape and staining properties of Purkinje neurons in the cerebellum cortex of all groups. Interestingly, the cells in the adjuvant-negative single-dose group had better shapes rather than the other groups (Fig. 6B) . Any pathology in the dentate gyrus and the pyramidal layer of the hippocampus was not seen in all groups (Fig. 6B) . Glomerulus in the bowman capsule (marked by arrowhead) wasn't seen in the control kidney due to section (Fig. 6B) . However, distal and proximal tubules in the kidney were observed similarly in all groups (Fig. 6B) . On the other hand, a statistically significant (p <0.05) inflammatory reaction was observed in the analyzed skin and kidney tissues in the adjuvant positive double dose vaccine administration group (Fig. 6B) . Furthermore, glomerulus structures in all vaccinated groups were normal. In toxicity analysis of skin tissue, inflammatory cells infiltration, and eosinophils in some dermis area of the vaccination points of the skin were detected in the double-dose groups (Fig. 6B) . This study further showed that treatments of the vaccine candidates did not have significant toxicity on the tissues. Finally, it was analyzed whether there was an increase in Th1, Th2, and Th17 dependent cytokine releases in the blood sera collected from the mouse groups that received the vaccine either at day 21. Compared to the control groups, no statistically significant cytokine increase was observed in any application group (Fig. 6C) . This analysis suggested that a toxic side effect of SK-01 V1 and OZG-3861 V1 in mouse groups were not determined. Histopathologic analysis on day 21 of A. lung (the arrow; chronic inflammation X100), jejunum of the intestine, liver, spleen, and B. cerebellum of brain, hippocampus, kidney, and skin. In the spleen, stars were foci of megakaryocytes and arrows were trabeculae (X400 H+E stain). In the cerebellum, the thin arrow was dendrites, the thick arrow was picnotic cell, the thin doubleheaded arrow was space. In the hippocampus, P was the pyramidal cell layer and D was dentate gyrus (X100 H+E stain). In the kidney, the arrow was interstitial chronic inflammation (X400 H+E stain). In the skin, black arrows were infiltrated inflammatory cells and red arrows were eosinophils (X40 H+E stain). C. Bar graphs showing quantitated mouse cytokine bead array analysis by assessing Th1, Th2, and Th17 specific cytokines (picogram/ml) in mice serum collected on day 21 of the vaccine treatment. To perform in vivo efficacy and dose studies of vaccine candidates, OZG-3861 V1 and SK-01 V1 were administered intradermally to the mouse groups as single or 15-day booster doses (Fig. 5A) . SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody analysis was performed in three different titrations (1:64, 1: 128 and 1: 256) in serum isolated from blood. According to the IgG ELISA result, the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody increase was significantly detected in all groups compared to the control (non-vaccinated) mouse group (*p<0.05) (Fig. 7A) . Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 monoclonal antibody was used in the same test as a positive control for the accuracy of the analysis (Fig. 7A) . The proof-of-concept has been optimized with the real-time cell analyzing (RTCA) system to determine the neutralization efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in serum content. As a representative data, with double dose SK-01 V1, control group serums were pre-incubated with SARS-CoV-2 virus at 10x TCID50 dose (Fig. 7B ) in 1: 128 and 1: 256 ratios, followed by Vero cell viability for approximately 6 days according to normalized cell index value in the RTCA system (Fig. 7C) . According to this analysis, we showed that double dose SK-01 V1 can neutralize the infective virus significantly compared to the control serum group even at 1: 256 dilutions (Fig. 7C) . When we conducted the same study for a single dose of SK-01 V1 and a single and double dose of OZG-3861 V1, it was seen that double dose OZG-3861 V1 at 1: 256 dilution also had virus neutralization capacity (Fig. 7D) . Although single-dose SK-01 V1 or OZG-3861 V1 did not show a significant neutralization efficacy at 1: 256 dilution (p>0.05), it was evaluated that it had neutralization capacity at 1: 128 dilution (Fig. 7D) . The high rate of neutralizing antibodies detected in control mice (in 2 out of 3 mice, %66) in this study suggests that the mice may have previously had a viral infection like the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), a member of the coronavirus family, related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this study suggested us to repeat the assay with mice that were considered to be negative for spontaneous neutralizing antibodies. However, the ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) test worked almost like a confirmation of the neutralizing antibody test, showing that the antibodies formed neutralized the virus without causing ADE (Fig. 7E) . This in vitro analysis with mice serum showed that the SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibody was produced with the help of immunization of mice with the first versions of SK-01 and OZG-3861 vaccine candidates without an ADE effect. Following the presence of antibodies due to B cell activity, T cell response was tested upon restimulation either with whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus or SARS-CoV-2 specific S, N, and M-protein peptide pool. The T cells were isolated from the spleen tissue of mice dissected either on day 21 or day 34. As T cells were incubated with the SARS-CoV-2 antigens, the cytokine secretion profile was evaluated on 72 hours (Fig. 8A) . Next, we wanted to determine the balance of Th1 and Th2 cell responses, we assessed an increase in the ratio of IL-12 to IL-4 and IFN to IL-4 (Fig. 8B) . This showed that our vaccine candidates predominantly biased towards Th1 CD4 T cell response regarding control T cells isolated from untreated mice spleens. Also, we determined a significant increase in the proportion of cytotoxic CD8 T cells from an adjuvant negative single dose (OZG-3861 V1) and adjuvant positive double dose (SK-01 V1) immunized mice upon re-stimulation with the peptide pool (Fig. 8C) . This showed that viral antigens caused CD8 T cell proliferation 34 days after vaccination. However, we could not determine an increase in the T cell activation marker, CD25 on both T cell subtype (Fig. 8C) . To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response, we analyzed the stimulated T cells providing specific IFNg secretion that were counted as spots in the IFN ELISPOT plate ( Fig. 8D and 8E ). According to this analysis, especially IFNg increase in T cells isolated from day21-dissected spleens was detected in a single or double dose of SK-01 V1 vaccine candidate containing adjuvant compared to the control mouse group (Fig. 8D) . Although there was no significant difference in the double dose of the OZG-3861 V1 vaccine candidate without adjuvant, an increase in IFNg was detected in single-dose administration (Fig. 8D) . On the other hand, we determined a significant IFNg secretion from the T cells isolated from day34-dissected spleens of the single or double dose of OZG-3861 V1 and a single dose of SK-01 V1 (Fig. 8E) . This analysis showed us that SK-01 V1 and OZG-3861 V1 vaccine candidates can achieve not only B cell response but also T cell response. These pre-clinical in vivo efficacy studies have encouraged us to challenge humanized ACE2 + mice and SK-01 V1 and OZG-3861 V1. There are steps based on the method to be considered to obtain an effective and safe result in terms of immunization in inactive vaccine production. Different methods are preferred in the vaccine inactivation process. In addition to chemical modifications such as formaldehyde or βpropiolactone, physical manipulations with ultraviolet radiation or gamma radiation may be preferred (Sabbaghi, Miri, Keshavarz, Zargar, & Ghaemi, 2019) . Chemical modifications in the vaccine inactivation process are time-consuming methods due to the need for purification, but they have disadvantages associated with toxicity. In three separate animal studies, we observed that single or double dose administrations with or without adjuvant were non-toxic. Also, it can cause changes in viral structure and product loss is also observed due to the necessity of purification in the final product. Ultraviolet radiation is noteworthy with its low penetration feature along with structural changes. All viral vaccines contain virus-like materials that they try to protect. This directs the immune system to generate a response and to produce antibodies ready for use if it encounters a true viral infection. However, it is worrying that the virus mutates to form "escape mutants". These are mutated versions of the virus that vaccine-induced antibodies do not recognize. For a significant immunization, it is necessary to create a vaccine profile that covers genetic variation in the community. If the genetic variation represented by the vaccine is small, triggering social immunity will not be at the desired rate. Therefore, the production and selection of more than one inactive viral strain remain an important mechanism for producing viral vaccines. Different variations may occur when producing large quantities (bulk) in the laboratory. Due to the low sensitivity of RNA-bound RNA polymerase, RNA viruses always produce a pool of variants during replication (Zhang et al., 2020) . This phenomenon provides a potential for the rapid evolution of the virus, but it also makes up the majority of mutations that have detrimental effects on virus stability. Increased virus complexity can cause a weakening of the population's virulence degree; therefore, the characterization of individual variants can provide useful information for the design of a new generation of more effective and safer vaccines. Lyophilization (freezedrying) is expressed as a process that combines the benefits of freezing and drying to obtain a dry, active, long shelf life, and easily soluble product (Karagül & Altuntaş, 2018) . Lyophilization is an important process for the preservation of heat-sensitive biological materials (Kunu, Jiwakanon, & Porntrakulpipat, 2019) . In the production of inactive vaccines, both inactivation and sterilization steps were carried out with a double dose (fractionated) gamma irradiation (25 kGy / single dose). With gamma irradiation, the frozen product can be irradiated, thus reducing the risk of toxicity as a free radical formation is prevented, and the risk of possible changes in the viral protein structure is reduced. Since functional viral structures are preserved, both B cell and T cell responses are triggered. With the first dose of irradiation, the raw product containing the live and infective virus is transformed into an intermediate product containing an inactive virus. Thus, before bottling, both the environment and personnel are protected. In our protocol, after the frozen raw product is converted into inactive form by gamma irradiation, it is melted, bottled, and lyophilized. Lyophilized formulations, together with the advantage of better stability, provide easy handling during transportation and storage. The second dose of irradiation performed after bottling (vialing) and lyophilization is performed to eliminate the presence of the replicant virus and end product sterilization. Also, unlike chemical inactivation methods, isolation and purification processes are not required. This means preserving the amount of product. As a result, while achieving inactivation and sterility with fractionated (2-stage) gamma irradiation, less damage to the final product virus structure occurs. In the toxicity analysis of vaccinated mice, we decided that adjuvant positive double dose administration should be removed in our newly designed version 2 vaccine model, especially due to the inflammatory reaction in the skin and kidney. Therefore, it was decided to increase the SARS-CoV-2 effective viral copy dose (1x10 11 or 3x10 11 viral copies per dose) in version 2 of vaccine candidates. When considered in terms of T and B cell responses, it was observed that especially the vaccine models containing GM-CSF as an adjuvant caused significant antibody production with neutralization capacity in the absence of ADE feature. In the formation of the SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody, the antibody was detected up to 1: 256 titration in all doses and formulations of vaccine candidates administered to mice. This neutralizing antibody ratio seen in the first version vaccine candidates with a viral copy number of approximately 10 7 /dose is predicted to achieve higher antibody concentration in the second version (1x10 11 or 3x10 11 viral copies per dose) of SK-01 V2 and OZG-3861 V2 vaccine candidates. Thus, it is aimed to ensure the presence of long-term antibodies. Next, we also determined the balance of Th1 and Th2 cell responses, because it was reported that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD) is associated with Th2-biased cell responses, both in some animal models and children vaccinated with whole-inactivated RSV and measles virus vaccines (Bolles et al., 2011; Corbett et al., 2020; Fulginiti, Eller, Downie, & Kempe, 1967; Kim et al., 1969) . Another finding showed that the presence of adjuvant is more important in T cell response rather than B. For long term T cell response, we tested restimulation of spleen T cells from 34-day immunized mice. The vaccinated mice showed T cell response upon restimulation with whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or peptide pool. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody from B cell of 34-day mice serum sera is not yet analyzed. However, the high rate of neutralizing antibodies detected in control mice in this study suggests that the mice may have previously had a viral infection similar to the coronavirus family (eg mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)) related to SARS-CoV-2 (Hasöksüz, Kiliç, & Saraç, 2020; Perlman, 2020) . To test this, we collected gaita from 5 mice to determine MHV copy using qRT-PCR. However, we did not determine any MHV copy in the gaita. This suggests that other coronavirus-family viruses maybe exist in these mice which may cause spontaneous neutralizing antibodies production. Spontaneous neutralizing antibodies had low titers when we analyzed at high titers (1:128 and 1:256) and we saw that our first version of vaccine candidates could have SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibody capacity as the serum was titrated. Therefore, this study prompted us to plan a new in vivo experiment with the second version of SK-01 and OZG-3861 (1x10 11 or 3x10 11 viral copies per dose) in humanized ACE2+ mice which are also negative for spontaneous neutralizing antibodies along. The vaccinated mice are planed to be infected with infective SARS-CoV-2 after 3-week of the immunization. This challenge test will also confirm the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibody and show immune protection of vaccinated mice from the SARS-CoV-2. Proposal for vaccination against SARS coronavirus using avian infectious bronchitis virus strain H from The Netherlands A Double-Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Provides Incomplete Protection in Mice and Induces Increased Eosinophilic Proinflammatory Pulmonary Response upon Challenge SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Development Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness This scientist hopes to test coronavirus drugs on animals in locked-down Wuhan Altered Reactivity to Measles Virus: Atypical Measles in Children Previously Immunized With Inactivated Measles Virus Vaccines Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2 Coronaviruses and sars-cov-2 An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 -Preliminary Report Liyofilizasyon: Genel Proses Değerlendirmesi. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine A bread-based lyophilized C-strain CSF virus vaccine as an oral vaccine in pigs Potential Interventions for Novel Coronavirus in China: A Systemic Review Genome Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and Effects of Spike Glycoprotein Variants on Protein Structure Lessons for COVID-19 immunity from other coronavirus infections Inactivation methods for whole influenza vaccine production SARS-CoV-2 isolation and propagation from Turkish COVID-19 patients Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines -14th Long-term passage of duck Tembusu virus in BHK-21 cells generates a completely attenuated and immunogenic population with increased genetic diversity