key: cord-0801398-crh9ecvb authors: Wang, Qiuyun; Liu, Lu title: On the Critical Role of Human Feces and Public Toilets in the Transmission of COVID-19: Evidence from China date: 2021-09-11 journal: Sustain Cities Soc DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103350 sha: 234a1a2a008528d27dc53ed1cc8fa95864ef44f6 doc_id: 801398 cord_uid: crh9ecvb The surprising spread speed of the COVID-19 pandemic creates an urgent need for investigating the transmission chain or transmission pattern of COVID-19 beyond the traditional respiratory channels. This study therefore examines whether human feces and public toilets play a critical role in the transmission of COVID-19. First, it develops a theoretical model that simulates the transmission chain of COVID-19 through public restrooms. Second, it uses stabilized epidemic data from China to empirically examine this theory, conducting an empirical estimation using a two-stage least squares (2SLS) model with appropriate instrumental variables (IVs). This study confirms that the wastewater directly promotes the transmission of COVID-19 within a city. However, the role of garbage in this transmission chain is more indirect in the sense that garbage has a complex relationship with public toilets, and it promotes the transmission of COVID-19 within a city through interaction with public toilets and, hence, human feces. These findings have very strong policy implications in the sense that if we can somehow use the ratio of public toilets as a policy instrument, then we can find a way to minimize the total number of infections in a region. As shown in this study, pushing the ratio of public toilets to the local population in a city to its optimal level would help to reduce the total infection in a region. The outbreak of COVID-19 diseases spreads very quickly all over the world, infecting millions of people in a very short period. The number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 continues to rise; according to real-time statistics released by the World Health Organization (WHO), the cumulative number of cases as of September 8, 2021, was around 223 million globally. 1 The virus that causes the infection and hence the diseases is formally called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The spread of COVID-19 disease is a multi-scenario and multi-factor concept. Although such concept is very different from the virus of SARS-CoV-2, the two terms are used mixedly to express the similar meaning in many situations. However, this study mainly describes the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in a specific scenario. Therefore, even though there are several terms of COVID-19 throughout this paper, when we talk about the transmission, we really mean the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The surprising speed of the virus's spread created an urgent need to investigate the chain and pattern of transmission of COVID-19. As it is considered a respiratory syndrome, the major route of its transmission is commonly considered to be through respiratory channels. Indeed, most current studies imply that the major routes of transmission of the virus are through respiratory droplets and fomites Hellewell et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2020; WHO, 2020) . Therefore, people are encouraged to wear face masks to prevent the active virus from entering and lodging in the nasal cavity and upper respiratory tract. However, it has been more than twenty months since the outbreak of and mankind is yet not certain about its exact transmission route. Now, the exacerbation of the global pandemic indicates that other potential methods of transmission might also exist. More recent studies are emerging, not only in the social vulnerability (Kashem et. al., 2021) , but also in the practical challenges (Poon & Tee, 2021) . However, knowledge about other potential vehicles for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 remain to be determined. 2 As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves to a global disaster, even to be out of control in many countries and regions, we need to seek for new answers by exploring new routes of transmission of the virus of SARS-CoV-2. Up till now, we cannot rule out other routes besides the traditional respiratory route (Dhama et al., 2020) , especially the fecal-associated routes and many others). The transmission chain of COVID-19 is still a puzzle. The SARS-CoV-2 virus can survive for a long time, remaining viable on the surface of objects. In fact, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, China) released a report on October 17, 2020, saying that it detected a COVID-positive live virus in samples of imported frozen cod in Qingdao. 3 Under certain environmental conditions, the virus on the surface of an object might lead to infection. In addition, it has been reported that transmission could have occurred from a COVID-positive family whose children smeared feces around their room in a quarantine hotel in Australia. It is possible that the nursing staff was infected by the high viral concentration in feces when they entered the room. 4 Because "the living environment matters" (Das et al., 2021) , concern about the possible involvement of human feces as well as wastewater and garbage in the transmission of COVID-19 has been raised since the outbreak of the pandemic (Liu, 2020; Quilliam et al., 2020) . In fact, evidence showing the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to be spread by fecal-oral, fecal-fomite, or fecal-aerosol routes has accumulated (Arslan et al.,2020; de Graaf et al., 2020; Ling et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020a) , which raises concern about public toilets. Indeed, several incidents led to a suspicion of potential fecal transmission. In June 2020, a couple in Beijing was infected with COVID-19 after a visit to a public restroom, where samples of the environment were confirmed to be positive for In August 2020, an evidence indicates that a woman was infected with coronavirus in the restroom while on a flight from Italy to South Korea. 6 In December 2020, Chengdu experienced a small wave of COVID-19, and according to an official bulletin, people who had gone to a particular public restroom were notified that they should take the nucleic acid test for possible exposure to the virus. Thereafter, the official guide advised people to use the public toilets less or not at all. 7 During the same period, in Wenjiang district in Chengdu, the 29 public toilets there were sanitized 118 times every day. 8 The most typical case was the one in Guangzhou in June 2021, which was confirmed in an official investigation. A person could be infected after only 14 seconds in a public restroom. 9 In recent decades, "sustainability" has become a popular topic of discussion. Because people need to use the toilet every day, it can be considered a fundamental object involved in sustainability in daily life that involves meeting basic needs. However, if everyday activities are associated with the transmission of an infectious disease such as COVID-19, attention needs to be paid to it to avoid seriously negative outcomes. After the outbreak of COVID-19, researchers inspected the sewers of university residence halls and found SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater samples. 10 Moreover, a study conducted by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità suggests that SARS-CoV-2 existed in wastewater collected from the entrance of treatment plants in northern Italy. 11 SARS-CoV-2 was also identified in sewage in Brazil 12 and Spain 13 respectively. Xiao and Torok (2020) suggest that governments should take measures to control the potential threat of reinfection from sewage. In February 1, 2020, China's Ministry of Ecology and the Environment (MEE, China) released a notice about the handling of medical sewage and urban sewage, to standardize the emergency treatment and disinfection requirements of medical wastewater, and to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through feces and sewage. 14 In August 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, the US) announced the establishment of a National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) to help local public health officials to better understand the spread of the COVID-19 in their communities. 15 In addition, the US CDC recommended that workers at wastewater treatment plants take standard precautions to prevent exposure to aerosolized sewage. In this paper, we conjecture that the one possible route of transmission is public toilets, and our results show strong associations between wastewater and infection. One plausible reason for this result is that people infected with COVID-19 emitted airborne aerosols that were propelled upward and outward when they flushed the toilet. Because the toilets are in a public space, those who enter that area after them could become infected. However, the use of physical barriers (Ren et al.,2021) and better ventilation (Kong et al., 2021) may decrease the spread of infection. As stated above, the transmission chain of COVID-19 still remains unclear. Because the virus can be found in public toilets, wastewater, and sewage, we now suspect the virus can be transmitted in ways other than the traditional respiratory channels. In addition, the concentration of the virus (i.e., virus load) matters a great deal in the transmission of COVID-19. So, this study examines whether human feces and public toilets play a critical role in that transmission. First, we develop a theoretical model that simulates the transmission chain of COVID-19 through public restrooms. Second, we use stabilized epidemic data in China to empirically examine this theory. Finally, we outline policy implications based on our findings. There is a burst of related studies emerging in recent months of 2021. Hence, we present perhaps the most up-to-date, comprehensive literature review before we formally develop our analysis. Next, we briefly review current support for the potential for fecal transmission and discuss the possible impacts from a public health perspective. By examining the relevant case reports, we provide a valuable reference for the prevention and control of infection with SARS-CoV-2. In the first strand of related studies, there are many review articles of COVID-19 and its potential relationship with the digestive system. A respiratory disease though it appears to be (Brooks & Bhatt, 2021) , as many studies have confirmed high rate of physiopathology with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms beyond the traditional respiratory system among COVID-19 patients (Devaux et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021a) , the gastrointestinal tract is now becoming one of the alternative explanations to understand the virus (Sridhar & Nicholls, 2021 (Wang et al., 2021a) , it has been used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 as a new focal point (Cipriano et al., 2020) . But what is the missing link to inspire further investigation (Brooks & Bhatt, 2021) ? One alternative route of infection might be the digestive system, however, previous studies have ignored or underestimated the number of asymptomatic people with early mild GI symptoms (Gu et al., 2020) . Studies have shown that COVID-19 depends on the ACE2 host cell factor (Hoffmann et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020) and can be transmitted through feces by entering host cells through the ACE2 cellular receptor , so the digestive system is a potential route for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Recent reports also point out that some patients who were infected with COVID-19 had GI symptoms, including diarrhea (Cheung et al., 2020; Liang et al., 2020; Yeo et al., 2020) . In addition, some researchers find that some patients infected with COVID-19 have active and prolonged viral infection in their gut, even in the absence of GI symptoms. 16 In fact, the prevalence and prolonged discharge in human feces has already been detected and identified of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in COVID-19 patients (Cheung et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2020; He et al., 2020; Xu et al. 2020a; Zhang et al., 2021) . The ratio of positively tested stool specimens with SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be up to 66.67%, among which 64.29% still test positive even if the patients' test results of pharyngeal swabs are already negative (Chen et al., 2021a) . Thus, the fecal viral activity of SARS-CoV-2 has obtained more and more academic concerns (Zuo et al., 2021) . Testing in fecal sample is also recommended to increase the detection sensitivity (Cao et al., 2021a; Foladori et al., 2020) . Other studies have shown that COVID-19 can be found in the feces of people who feel sick as well as those without any symptoms (Bai et al., 2020; Kam et al., 2020; Mesoraca et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020) . Wang et al. (2004) find that SARS-CoV-1 can survive for more than 17 days in feces and urine. Holshue et al. (2020) report the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the first confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in the United States. After the patient's hospitalization, the results showed that the stool and respiratory tract samples were COVID-19 positive, but the serum was still negative. Obviously, the virus remains in the feces longer than in the respiratory tract. Studying a stool screening test, Zuo et al. (2021) note that some COVID-19 patients had positive stool tests but negative tests with respiratory samples. Moreover, Wu et al. (2020) find that viral RNA shed in fecal samples for approximately five weeks after the patients' respiratory samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Xu et al. (2020a) examine SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and find that eight of ten children tested positive on rectal swabs even after nasopharyngeal testing was negative. Studies in children's specimens of feces show positive RNA up to 30 or even 54 days (Xie et al., 2020) . show that SARS-CoV-2 can be found in feces, and even though the virus is not detected in the respiratory tract, stool samples can remain positive. Zhu et al. (2015) state that viral RNA could be detected in fecal samples from 15 patients with a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Moreover, Mesoraca et al. (2020) write that six fecal specimens became positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, while 13 respiratory tests returned negative results 15 days after the first positive respiratory specimens test. A natural implication of the fecal viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 leads to the concern of the potential fecal-oral transmission. In fact, A few studies raise the possibility of fecal-oral transmission based on the extended duration of viral shedding in stool samples. Such gastrointestinal illness induced by COVID-19 indicates high likelihood of transmission route of fecal material (Chen et al., 2021a; Olusola-Makinde et al., 2020) . Thus, the possibility of fecal-oral route has become a popular hypothesis which is suggested by the facts shown above (Bonato et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021a; Troisi et al., 2021) . Some scholars even consider it to be the cause of community transmission with a major environmental concern (Jones et al., 2020; Mohan et al., 2021) . Moreover, it has been prompting from clinical research (Pola et al., 2021) to a major public health concern (Panchal et al., 2021a; Usman et al., 2021) . However, the fecal-oral transmission is not the only concern we have. In fact, it may even not be the primary route (Albert et al., 2021) . Perhaps, we may need to worry about the fecal associated aerosols more (Cao et al., 2021b) . Now, the respiratory aerosols with much smaller size than the droplets are considered to contribute a lot to the infection of SARS-CoV-2 (Wang et al., 2021b) . In fact, studies on other diseases in the past suggest that the aerosol route can play a contributing role in transmission (Salgado et al., 2002; Ignatius et al., 2004; Atkinson & Wein, 2007; Brankston et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2010) . This would lead to the discussion of built environment (Li et al., 2021a; Liu et al., 2021) and especially indoor environment (Barbieri et al., 2021; Ren et. al., 2021) . In fact, besides the environmental surface (Dargahi et al., 2021) , the small and close environment provides scenarios of high risk of aerosols exposure (Ahmadzadeh & Shams, 2021) . Although proper physical isolation measures, such as social distancing and wearing masks (Sun, & Zhai, 2020; Choi & Shim, 2021; Liao et al., 2021; Su et al., 2021) , are effective for reducing the transmission of infection, indoor environments can still be risky, which leaves open the possibility of transmission via feces until this is disproven. Some scholars have paid attention to the ventilation system which may contribute either positively or negatively to the virus spread (Kong et al., 2021; Senatore et al., 2021; Sha et. al., 2021) . There is no doubt that optimized ventilation system can decrease the transmission of virus (Dumont-Leblond et al., 2020) . Beyond the ventilation, heating and air conditioning systems also add new concern in their roles with the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (Horve et al., 2021) . A typical example of the closed indoor environment with poor hygiene condition is the public restrooms. The risk of exposure in public toilets theoretically comes from aerosol transmission, which has been suggested to be an additional pathway. 17 Flushing produces aerosol sprays, and if the viruses are present in feces, the concern is that inhalation of aerosols is produced by people infected with SARS-CoV-2 when they cough or even speak, which can cause the virus to spread. Even the toilet paper is concerned for its hoarding (Labad et al., 2021) . In fact, the aerosol generation with unhealthy outcomes has been studied even before the COVID-19 pandemic (Aithinne et al., 2019) . As early as discussed by the classical research of microbiological hazards (Gerba et al., 1975) , the aerosol can be generated by toilet plume or flushing which may cause aerosolization (Barker & Jones, 2005; Best et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2013a; Johnson et al., 2013b; Hamilton et al., 2018) or bioaerosol concentrations (Knowlton et al., 2018) . In the process, the emission strength can be strong (Lai et al., 2018) , which may promote the transmission of virus if there is any according to the fluid dynamics ). An earlier study of hospital toilets also found that the bioaerosol concentrations were significantly greater after fecal waste was flushed down the toilet and might remain in the air for more than 30 minutes (Knowlton et al., 2018) . After the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of fecal transmission in public toilets via bioaerosols has soon obtained attention by researchers both in hospital conditions (Ding et al., 2021) and other scenarios (Schreck et al., 2021; Usman et al., 2021) . This adds alternative explanations to the "traditional" respiratory droplets. A recent study measuring viral RNA in aerosols at two hospitals in China during the outbreak of COVID-19 found that aerosols were higher in the area near the toilets in a patient's room. This suggests that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted through aerosols (Casanova et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2020) . Van Doremalen et al. (2020) report that SARS-CoV-2 could stay in the aerosols up to three hours. Li et al. (2020) also find that flushing the toilet can disperse virus-laden aerosols about 3 feet high, which computer simulations show can be inhaled. They show that after the toilet is flushed, 40-60% of the particles rose above the toilet seat and hovered in the air. As point out, massive number of people in many low-income and developing countries and regions have no access to private sanitary facilities with clean environment, which may become a leak of containment in the virus spread. Even in the developed world, the public restrooms are difficult to maintain high sanitation standards. Besides, regardless of the fecal related issues, the risk of indoor aerosols oriented viral transmission itself in the enclosed spaces for public use can be high (Chen et al., 2021b; . Moreover, concerns have been raised about whether solid human waste washed into the sewers can cause reinfection. Researchers around the world have traced the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through wastewater and sewage. Some are optimistic that this reinfection is unlikely happened because the chemicals added to the water destined for urban sewer pipes are disinfectants and prevent spread of the virus. Gundy et al. (2009) showed that the coronavirus dies off very quickly in wastewater, and the time required for the virus titer to decrease 99.9% (T99.9) is between two and four days. However, Casanova et al. (2009) state that the coronavirus can remain infectious for long periods in water and pasteurized settled sewage. Previous studies have said that SARS-CoV-1 was detected in sewage from hospitals in China during the SARS outbreak (Lee, 2003; Wang et al., 2005) . Bibby and Peccia (2013) detected that different types of human viruses can be discharged into the sewage collection system and concentrated in sewage sludge. Besides the pioneer research of Liu (2020) , now with the complex interaction of human feces and public restrooms, this would eventually make SARS-CoV-2 reach sewage systems (Javier et al., 2020; Albert et al., 2021; Giacobbo et al., 2021; Graham et al., 2021; Ihsanullah et al., 2021; Panchal et al., 2021a) . Naddeo and Liu (2020) consider the spread of COVID-19 throughout wastewater systems. Wang et al. (2020a) say that the nucleic acid of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in the sewage of two hospitals in China. In fact, there are many studies show the prolonged survival of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment of wastewater and sewage, which can be up to several days or even longer (Giacobbo et al., 2021) . Therefore, wastewater as well as the corresponding treatments become very vulnerable to the virus transmission (Foladori et al., 2020) . As a result, the pipeline and the plumbing systems are becoming hazardous zones (Collivignarelli et al., 2020; Dight & Gormley, 2021) . Even before the current pandemic, the aerosolization of wastewater systems was studied for its potential role in the viruses' transmission (Lee et al., 2016) . Beyond the fecal-oral route, the aerosolized water that is contaminated by SARS-CoV-2 can be the much more dangerous transmission route (de Oliveira et al., 2021) . Although some scholars claim "lack of evidence" against the infectious SARS-CoV-2 in feces and sewage in recent study (Albert et al., 2021) , such claim itself might be lack of evidence. Now, the contamination of the aquatic systems by the virus of SARS-CoV-2 and especially the health consequences of aerosolized wastewater (Usman et al., 2021) have already become a major public health concern (Panchal et al., 2021b) . Up till now, the viral RNA of SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in sewage with wastewater in many countries and regions around the globe, and even in surface waters in some places. Some notable examples are listed alphabetically here, but are not limited to: Canada (D'Aoust et al., 2021) , Finland (Hokajrvi et al., 2021) , Germany (Agrawal et al., 2021; Westhaus et al., 2021) , Hong Kong (Cheung et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020b) , Hungary (Roka et al., 2021) , India (Chakraborty et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2021) , Iran (Tanhaei et al., 2021) , Israel (Bar-Or et al., 2021) , Italy (La Rosa et al., 2021) , Mexico (Coronado et al., 2021) , Netherlands (Medema et al., 2020) , Pakistan (Haque et al., 2021) , Qatar (Saththasivam et al., 2021) , Saudi Arabia (Alahdal et al., 2021) , Serbia (Kolarevic et al., 2021) , Spain (Randazzo et al., 2020) , Switzerland (Fernandez-Cassi et al., 2021) , the United Kingdom (Hillary et al., 2021; Martin et al., 2020) , the United States (Li et al., 2021c; Sherchan et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020b) , and Venezuela Notable examples are listed but are not limited to water media , "sewage epidemiology" (Mackul'ak et al., 2021) , shedding dynamics model (Miura et al., 2021) , virus spreading surveillance (Anand et al., 2021) , monitor and control of mass transmission (Panchal et al., 2021a) , and even clinical breakthrough (Alygizakis et al., 2021) . Among these, the risk of community infection due to wastewater has already become an editorial concern by the academia (Fielder & Ferrell, 2021) . Unfortunately, the community spread due to wastewater happens not only in the developing countries like India which has already led to terrible results (Chakraborty et al., 2021) , but also in the developed countries like Canada (D'Aoust et al., 2021) . Then, where would the water in the sewage system finally go to? The freshwater environments and water safety are substantially jeopardized by SARS-CoV-2 RNA (Mahlknecht et al., 2021) . In fact, the natural water system such as rivers has already been detected with SARS-CoV-2 (Coronado et al., 2021; de Oliveira et al., 2021; Kolarevic et al., 2021) . According to the fecal transmission route, the treatment facilities for municipal wastewater have become the critical node in the fight against COVID-19 (Panchal et al., 2021a; Saththasivam et al., 2021; Sherchan et al., 2021; Wolfem et al., 2021) . Even the treated water samples are tested positive (Randazzo et al., 2020) . Therefore, the sanitation process in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) must be reinforced, and it also provides important measure to monitor the epidemiological trend, which is essentially an early surveillance (warning) system (Foladori et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2020; Panchal et al., 2021b; Shao et al., 2021) . If we can monitor the viral load (e.g., how many copies/mL or copies/100 mL) in the water, we can find a way to estimate the virus spread in the community (Foladori et al., 2020) . There can be a functional relationship between the two if proper surveillance (warning) system can be established. In this case, the viral shedding in feces can be parameterized for the Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) (LaTurner et al., 2021; Miura et al., 2021) or a broader concept of environment (Shao et al., 2021) . Furthermore, such surveillance (warning) system can be a very cost-effective way to know the spreading and mutations of SARS-CoV-2 in the population-level prevalence (Gibas et al., 2021; Kantor et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021b; Mackul'ak et al., 2021; Saini & Deepak, 2021; Singh et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020b; Wong et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021) . A promising surveillance tool as it appears to be, some scholars believe that the rapid monitoring is at least one of the keys to end the current mass transmission (Panchal et al., 2021b; Zhu et al., 2021) . Some even consider it to be a breakthrough in the clinical practice with limited testing capacity in laboratories (Alygizakis et al., 2021) and superior to the traditional clinical methods in population-level testing (Bar-Or et al., 2021) . Some scholars call this "Sewage Tracking" (Martin et al., 2020) . While some focus on the hospital wastewater (Acosta et al., 2021) , some others focus on the wastewater of residential building (Wong et al., 2021) as well as university campus (Gibas et al., 2021) . This may be particularly useful in the developing world (Saini & Deepak, 2021) . Indeed, there are already some successful examples, such as the sewage detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA two weeks before the outbreak in Hungary (Roka et al., 2021) , one to two weeks ahead of the official announcement in India , three days before the first case in England (Martin et al., 2020) , the incidence in Switzerland (Fernandez-Cassi et al., 2021) , and others. Now, hundreds of studies have related COVID-19 with water science (Ji et al., 2021) . Researchers in top academic journals have called for the establishment of the global database for wastewater surveillance as part of the international cooperation (Bivins et al., 2020) to support the decision-making in the public health sectors (Lundy et al., 2021) . Of course, there are uncertainties in every step of the above estimation process (Li et al., 2021d) , which needs future studies to upgrade it. To the best of our knowledge, most of these studies are review or descriptive type of articles. First, few city-wide level evidences are found to support the interaction of public toilets in the SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Second, few proper analytical frameworks are set up to conduct the corresponding research. And these are the gaps that this study tries to fill during this hard time. The initial number of infections in a region is I0. PRR is the probability of visit to a public restroom by someone who is infected. The infection multiplier of the public restroom is InfRR. Therefore, the number of new infections equals the initial number of infections times the visits to a public restroom, which can be expressed as follows. 10 RR RR Thus the ratio of reproduction can be calculated as follows. Although I0 can be considered a constant in the regression, PRR is difficult to quantify in reality. We therefore use the ratio of the number of public toilets to the local population in a city or simply the number of public toilets to represent the likelihood of a visit to a public toilet by someone who is infected; although we do not use them at the same time, we compare the results of different model specifications. In addition, to proxy for InfRR, we use the local urban population. These two proxies are not perfect because acquiring accurate data on the two key variables might be technically impossible, but they are necessary. Of course, more control variables must be introduced to explore the transmission of COVID-19 further. The statistical methods we use in this study are simple but meaningful. In addition to the standard ordinary least squares (OLS) method, we use two-stage least squares (2SLS) with appropriate instrumental variables (IVs) to conduct the empirical estimation. However, the choice of IV is a real challenge for researchers. In this study, the key explanatory variable-the number of public toilets or its ratio to population-can be correlated with the stochastic error term in the regression, which is identified as an endogeneity issue. To correct the inconsistent estimation results, we need to use an appropriate IV, hence, we employ the 2SLS estimation method. In this case, urban residential wastewater or residential garbage is used as the IV, which might show important clues as to the possible intermediate role played by human feces on the transmission of COVID-19. In fact, their complex relationship might be difficult or even impossible to observe. We can observe the viral concentration in human feces in the laboratory, but doing so in an urban context for a large-scale outbreak, i.e., at a city-wide scale, would be difficult or even impossible. When we consider wastewater as well as garbage at the city level, the task becomes even harder. Our design here is novel (and somewhat "tricky"). The novelty of our design is that we use statistical tests to check whether wastewater or garbage at the city level is explicitly influential in viral transmission or implicit but functional as an intermediary for feces in transmission. Because the exact influence of these important factors at the city level (rather than in the lab) cannot be quantified and measured, if our statistical design passes appropriate statistical tests, then in a statistical sense, we can confirm the impact and interaction of these factors (i.e., human feces, wastewater, and garbage) at the city level. The specific regression method employed is that of two-stage least squares (2SLS) with appropriate instrumental variables (IVs To our knowledge, the design of this analytical framework is novel, as discussed further below. This study uses data combined from several sources from China. We select data Hubei Province, we use the confirmed numbers at the end of June 2020. As shown in Fig. 1 , there appears to be strong correlation between confirmed COVID-19 cases and the number of public toilets in most of the sample cities. (Insert Fig. 1 about here.) As mentioned earlier, we need to introduce several control variables into our regression. First, we include the distance from a city to the epicenter in mainland China, i.e., Wuhan, as measured with the digital map on Baidu.com. 19 Second, we add data on the local urban characteristics for the sample cities, primarily obtained from the China City Statistical Yearbook 2018. 20 We pay particular attention to urban wastewater and residential garbage, which might be directly or indirectly linked with human feces. In addition, we include some other variables, such as urban district area, green coverage area, and urban built district are also used, though they are not the primary focus of this paper. All the summary statistics are shown in Table 1 . (Insert Table. 1 about here.) Here, we try to keep the description of the empirical results as clear as possible, since all the results are in Tables 2, 3, and 4. Therefore, in the results section, we try to highlight the comparisons of the results in different models. In Tables 2 and 3 , we show several groups of empirical estimation results using ln(Wastewater) as the IV. In Table 3 , the explanatory variable is "ln(Garbage)," unlike in Table 2 . In addition, we also differentiate between "ln(Number_of_Latrines)" and "ln(Number_of Latrines_Ratio)" as the explanatory variable. The corresponding OLS version of the models are presented here as well. (Insert Table. 2 and 3 about here.) In Table 2 , which does not consider the impact of garbage, the key focus of this study, i.e., the number of public toilets, tends to be positive and significant in its estimation parameter regardless of its absolute value (e.g., Models (1)-(2) and Models (5)-(6)) or its relative or ratio form (e.g., Models (3)-(4) and Models (7)- (8) (Table 3) , the number of public toilets is no longer statistically significant in general, which is not the desired outcome. In addition, all the F-statistics in the tests of weak instruments in the 2SLS models in Table 3 are less than 10, which means they fail the tests. Notably, ln(Dist_to_Wuhan) is generally negative and significant in all models, and its estimation parameters appear to be robust among different model specifications. For example, in Model (2), the result shows that an increase of 1.372% in the number of infections occurs in locations that are 1% closer to Wuhan (i.e., a smaller distance). In Model (4), this marginal impact is 1.265%, which is very similar to that in Model (3). This result shows that the distance from Wuhan is a very powerful control variable that can help us isolate the local characteristic of the cities with COVID-19 transmission. In addition, ln(Urban_District_Population) is typically found to be positive and significant in the OLS estimations. Only in Model (4) in Table 2 is its coefficient positive and significant under 2SLS estimation. As shown in the results, the marginal impact is 1% to 1.428%. Moreover, the inclusion of ln(Urban_District_Area) or ln(Green_Coverage_Area) has no persuasive results. In Model (6), the result shows that a 1% increase in the green coverage area would decrease infections by 0.615%. In Table 3 , although the coefficients of ln(Garbage) are generally positive and significant, it distorts other aspects of the models, in particular the primary research target of this study, i.e., the number of public toilets. So, how can our empirical results be improved? In Table 4 , we use ln(Wastewater) as the explanatory variable and ln(Garbage) as the IV. The overall performance of this group of models appears to be better: the number of public toilets is positive and significant in its estimation coefficients, either in its original form or the ratio form. In Model (22), when the number of public toilets increases by 1%, the number of COVID-19 infections rises by 0.819%. Then, in Model (24), the marginal impact is 1% to 1.147% using the ratio version of the number of public toilets. (Insert Table. 4 about here.) With regard to the control variables, ln(Dist_to_Wuhan) and ln(Urban_District_Population) are as good as expected in the estimation parameters. In Model (22), the estimated marginal impact of the distance from Wuhan is 1% to -1.318%, and the coefficient in Model (24) is -1.298, which is still very close in percentage terms. In addition, ln(Green_Coverage_Area) and ln(Built_District) tend to have negative and significant estimation coefficients. This result means that larger areas tend to have a lower number of infections. In Model (20) , the marginal impact of the green coverage area on local infections is 1% to -0.343%, and in Model (22) the impact of built area on the number of infections is 1% to -0.704%. Although the reasons for these results might be complex, when cities have more such areas, viral transmission is more difficult, hence those cities have fewer confirmed COVID-19 infections. Notably, we combine the use of the IV ln(Garbage) and the explanatory variable ln(Wastewater) in the group of models shown in Table 4 Although the endogeneity test fails in Model (18), it passes in Model (20), (22), and (24). The results of the weak instrument test are generally good, either close to the empirically critical value of 10 or much larger than 10. Among all the models in this group, we prefer Models (22) and (24). Although the statistical results appear to be slightly better in Model (22) , in terms of more significant estimation coefficients (larger R 2 value and F-statistics in the test of weak instruments), the two models essentially differ very little. Many scholars have placed their concerns on the low-income countries or developing world where there is inadequate water for sanitation use (Castro et al., 2021; Eichelberger et al., 2021; Troisi et al., 2021) or the usage of virus-contaminated water . In such scenarios, the fecal-oral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has much higher risk (Chacin-Bonilla et al., 2021) and the community spread would be a more common consequence due to poor sanitation infrastructure (Eichelberger et al., 2021) . In the more vulnerable case, the squat toilets (especially with lidless designs) become new risk factors cases . Some scholars have mentioned India, where the dense population along with the poor sanitation condition make things worse (Panchal et al., 2021b) . In the previous section, we showed that human feces and public toilets might play a critical role in the transmission of COVID-19. In regions with relatively poor public sanitation, where human waste might be openly exposed, viral transmission could be even higher. Therefore, using the infection multipliers InfOPEN and InfRR, respectively, Because we are particularly interested in how the ratio of PRR affects the total number of infections TI, we take the first derivative of TI with respect to PRR. Simplifying this equation yields: By solving for PRR in Equation 8, we obtain the "optimal" value as follows: Equation 9 shows that the value of PRR * must be between 0 and 1. Therefore, it satisfies the requirement of probability. However, we do not know whether this "optimal" value is the maximum or the minimum. Thus, we need to examine the second-order condition. Therefore, we differentiate TI with respect to PRR twice as follows. It is not difficult for us to conclude that . We therefore confirm that the "optimal" value of PRR * is the minimum. These findings have very strong policy implications in the sense that if we can use the ratio of public toilets to the local population in a city or simply the number of public toilets (i.e., PRR * ) as a policy instrument, then we can minimize the number of total infections in a region due to exposure at a public toilet. This study presents novel insights into potential COVID-19 infection after fecal exposure at public toilets. It briefly reviews the current support for the possibility of fecal transmission and discusses the possible impacts from a public health perspective. First, a theoretical model is employed. Second, the statistical connection is established between infection and public sanitation. Then, it statistically simulates the transmission chain of COVID-19 at public restrooms and concludes that wastewater, along with garbage, promote the transmission of COVID-19. The results can provide a valuable reference for the prevention and control of the ongoing pandemic. So, we can draw a conclusion with very strong statistical significance that wastewater directly promotes the transmission of COVID-19 within a city. However, the role of garbage in this transmission chain is more indirect in the sense that garbage has a complex relationship with public toilets, and it promotes the transmission of COVID-19 within a city through the interaction of public toilets and human feces. The complicated potential transmission chain of COVID-19 is illustrated in Fig. 2. (Insert Fig. 2 about here.) These findings in this study may be of particular importance for India, as it suffers from relatively poor public sanitation conditions, which might contribute to its rapid increase in COVID-19 infection. As shown above, increasing the ratio of public toilets to the optimal level would help to reduce the total infection in a region. In addition, as shown in the empirical results, good control of urban wastewater and residential garbage would also help to cut the transmission chain of COVID-19. The findings in this study can be of general interest and applied elsewhere. We therefore hope that this study can provide new clues which can help contribute to the control of COVID-19 during such a time with hardship. Because the information and data currently available are rather limited, our discussion lacks many important factors. For example, wearing face masks and hand washing can effectively reduce fecal exposure. Critical information on wearing face masks and hand washing is missing under the circumstances of human feces and public toilets. In addition, some other temporal factors, such as how long the virus remains transmissible, are also important. Moreover, we should also consider the impact of some auxiliary equipment such as the ventilation system (e.g., exhaust fans), which might already be installed. These factors could also play a significant role in COVID-19 transmission and should be examined in future studies. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Note: The values of the constant terms are not reported. Robust Std. Err. in parentheses. *** p ≤ 0.01, ** 0.01< p < 0.05, *0.05< p < 0.1 Model (17) %2F2019-ncov%2Fcases-updates%2Fwastewater-surveillance The Scientist National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Baidu Map A multicenter study investigating SARS-CoV-2 in tertiary-care hospital wastewater. viral burden correlates with increasing hospitalized cases as well as hospital-associated transmissions and outbreaks Assessment of socioeconomic inequality based on virus-contaminated water usage in developing countries: A review Long-term monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater of the Frankfurt metropolitan area in Southern Germany Passenger exposure to respiratory aerosols in a train cabin: Effects of window, injection source, output flow location Toilet plume aerosol generation rate and environmental contamination following bowl water inoculation with Clostridium difficile spores Municipal wastewater viral pollution in Saudi Arabia: effect of hot climate on COVID-19 disease spreading. Environmental Science and Pollution Research Lack of evidence for infectious SARS-CoV-2 in feces and sewage Analytical methodologies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: Protocols and future perspectives A review of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater and airborne particulates and its use for virus spreading surveillance Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via fecal-oral and aerosols-borne routes: Environmental dynamics and implications for wastewater management in underprivileged societies Quantifying the Routes of Transmission for Pandemic Influenza Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19 Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants by genomic analysis of wastewater samples in Israel Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from indoor air samples in environmental monitoring needs adequate temporal coverage and infectivity assessment The potential spread of infection caused by aerosol contamination of surfaces after flushing a domestic toilet Potential for aerosolization of clostridium difficile after flushing toilets: the role of toilet lids in reducing environmental contamination risk Identification of Viral Pathogen Diversity in Sewage Sludge by Metagenome Analysis Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19 Fecal-Oral Transmission of SARS-COV-2: Practical Implications Transmission of influenza A in human beings The gut microbiome: a missing link in understanding the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19? Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies Coronavirus in water media: Analysis, fate, disinfection and epidemiological applications Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in fecal samples with different pretreatment methods and PCR kits Multiple relationships between aerosol and COVID-19: A framework for global studies Survival of surrogate coronaviruses in water Global occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental aquatic matrices and its implications for sanitation and vulnerabilities in Brazil and developing countries SARS-CoV-2: Potential feco-oral transmission and implications on the spread and severity of COVID-19 in Venezuela First surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and organic tracers in community wastewater during post lockdown in Chennai, South India: Methods, occurrence and concurrence A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster Role of indoor aerosols for covid-19 viral transmission: a review COVID-19 and gastroenteric manifestations Gastrointestinal Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Virus Load in Fecal Samples From a Hong Kong Cohort: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Optimal strategies for social distancing and testing to control COVID-19 Gastrointestinal Infection Could Be New Focus for Coronavirus Diagnosis SARS-CoV-2 in sewer systems and connected facilities SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater from Mexico City used for irrigation in the Mezquital Valley: quantification and Implications of inadequate water and sanitation infrastructure for community spread of COVID-19 in remote Alaskan communities Wastewater monitoring outperforms case numbers as a tool to track COVID-19 incidence dynamics when test positivity rates are high Wastewater Tracks Community Infection SARS-CoV-2 from faeces to wastewater treatment: What do we know. A review Microbiological Hazards of Household Toilets: Droplet Production and the Fate of Residual Organisms A critical review on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in water and wastewater. What do we know? Implementing building-level SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance on a university campus SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Settled Solids Is Associated with COVID-19 Cases in a Large Urban Sewershed COVID-19: Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Potential Fecal-Oral Transmission Survival of Coronaviruses in Water and Wastewater Persistent viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in faeces-a rapid review Health risks from exposure to Legionella in reclaimed water aerosols: Toilet flushing, spray irrigation, and cooling towers Digestive Symptoms in COVID-19 Patients With Mild Disease Severity: Clinical Presentation, Stool Viral RNA Testing, and Outcomes A novel RdRp-based colorimetric RT-LAMP assay for rapid and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical and sewage samples from Pakistan Public health might be endangered by possible prolonged discharge of SARS-CoV-2 in stool Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in municipal wastewater to evaluate the success of lockdown measures for controlling COVID-19 in the UK SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor The detection and stability of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA biomarkers in wastewater influent in Helsinki First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States Identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in healthcare heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in water environments: Current status, challenges and research opportunities Tracking SARS-CoV-2 in Sewage: Evidence of Changes in Virus Variant Predominance during COVID-19 Pandemic Water science under the global epidemic of COVID-19: Bibliometric tracking on COVID-19 publication and further research needs Aerosol Generation by Modern Flush Toilets Lifting the lid on toilet plume aerosol: a literature review with suggestions for future research Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and urine and its potential role in person-to-person transmission and the environment-based spread of COVID-19 A Well Infant with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with High Viral load Challenges in Measuring the Recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from Wastewater Exploring the nexus between social vulnerability, built environment, and the prevalence of COVID-19: A case study of Chicago Bioaerosol Concentrations Generated from Toilet Flushing in a Hospital-based Patient Care Setting Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the Danube River in Serbia associated with the discharge of untreated wastewaters Experimental study on the control effect of different ventilation systems on fine particles in a simulated hospital ward Unravelling the early warning capability of wastewater surveillance for COVID-19: A temporal study on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and need for the escalation SARS-CoV-2 has been circulating in northern Italy since December 2019: Evidence from environmental monitoring A systematic review and realist synthesis on toilet paper hoarding: COVID or not COVID, that is the question Emission strength of airborne pathogens during toilet flushing Evaluating recovery, cost, and throughput of different concentration methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based epidemiology Partitioning of Viruses in Wastewater Systems and Potential for Aerosolization The SARS epidemic in Hong Kong Fine-Scale Temporal Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Abundance in Wastewater during A COVID-19 Lockdown Association of built environment attributes with the spread of COVID-19 at its initial stage in China Uncertainties in estimating SARS-CoV-2 prevalence by wastewater-based epidemiology Data-driven estimation of COVID-19 community prevalence through wastewater-based epidemiology Can a toilet promote virus transmission? From a fluid dynamics perspective Diarrhoea may be underestimated: a missing link in 2019 novel coronavirus A technical review of face mask wearing in preventing respiratory COVID-19 transmission Gastrointestinal symptoms of 95 cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease re-habilitation patients The impacts of the built environment on the incidence rate of COVID-19: A case study of King County Emerging Study on the Transmission of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) from Urban Perspective: Evidence from China Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding Making Waves: Collaboration in the time of SARS-CoV-2-rapid development of an international co-operation and wastewater surveillance database to support public health decision-making The faecal metabolome in COVID-19 patients is altered and associated with clinical features and gut microbes Wastewater-Based Epidemiology as an Early Warning System for the Spreading of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Mutations in the Population The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different freshwater environments in urban settings determined by RT-qPCR: Implications for water safety Can a Paper-Based Device Trace COVID-19 Sources with Wastewater-Based Epidemiology? Tracking SARS-CoV-2 in Sewage: Evidence of Changes in Virus Variant Predominance during COVID-19 Pandemic Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 RNA in Sewage and Correlation with Reported COVID-19 Prevalence in the Early Stage of the Epidemic in The Netherlands Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in fecal samples Duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding in faeces as a parameter for wastewater-based epidemiology: Re-analysis of patient data using a shedding dynamics model SARS-CoV-2 in environmental perspective: Occurrence, persistence, surveillance, inactivation and challenges Editorial Perspectives: 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): what is its fate in urban water cycle and how can the water research community respond? Environmental Science Ticking bomb: Prolonged faecal shedding of novel coronavirus (2019-ncov) and environmental implications SARS-CoV-2: sewage surveillance as an early warning system and challenges in developing countries SARS-CoV-2: fate in water environments and sewage surveillance as an early warning system COVID-19 and gastrointestinal system: a brief review Detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in fecal specimens: The practical challenges COVID-19: The environmental implications of shedding SARS-CoV-2 in human faeces SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater anticipated COVID-19 occurrence in a low prevalence area Mitigating COVID-19 infection disease transmission in indoor environment using physical barriers Ahead of the second wave: Early warning for COVID-19 by wastewater surveillance in Hungary Wastewater-based epidemiology for novel Coronavirus detection in wastewater Influenza in the acute hospital setting An optimized and robust PEG precipitation method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak monitoring using wastewater-based epidemiology in Qatar Aerosol generation in public restrooms Indoor versus outdoor transmission of SARS-COV-2: environmental factors in virus spread and underestimated sources of risk Optimal control of high-rise building mechanical ventilation system for achieving low risk of COVID-19 transmission and ventilative cooling The role of airborne particles and environmental considerations in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Six Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants at the Early Stage of COVID-19 Pandemic in The United States Detection and disinfection of COVID-19 virus in wastewater Pathophysiology of infection with SARS-CoV-2-What is known and what remains a mystery A novel social distancing analysis in urban public space: A new online spatio-temporal trajectory approach The efficacy of social distance and ventilation effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission Open defecation and squat toilets, an overlooked risk of fecal transmission of COVID-19 and other pathogens in developing communities How human thermal plume influences near-human transport of respiratory droplets and airborne particles: a review Detection of Novel Coronavirus by RT-PCR in Stool Specimen from Asymptomatic Child The first detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the wastewater of Tehran Review article: Gastrointestinal features in COVID-19 and the possibility of faecal transmission COVID-19 and the gastrointestinal tract: Source of infection or merely a target of the inflammatory process following SARS-CoV-2 infection? Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in Aerosolized Wastewater: Toilet Flushing, Wastewater Treatment, and Sprinkler Irrigation Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1 Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with COVID-19: impact on the gut microbiome Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan COVID-19 and the digestive system: A comprehensive review High-throughput wastewater analysis for substance use assessment in central New York during the COVID-19 pandemic Concentration and detection of SARS coronavirus in sewage from Xiao Tang Shan Hospital and the 309th Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Study on Resistance of SARS-Conarovirus Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater in Germany -Suitability for COVID-19 surveillance and potential transmission risks Scaling of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Settled Solids from Multiple Wastewater Treatment Plants to Compare Incidence Rates of Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 in Their Sewersheds Possible Role of Aerosol Transmission in a Hospital Outbreak of Influenza Non-intrusive wastewater surveillance for monitoring of a residential building for COVID-19 cases Report of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples Taking the right measures to control COVID-19 Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2 Follow-up Study of Long-time Positive RT-PCR in Stool Specimens From Asymptomatic Children Infected With SARS-CoV-2 The first case study of wastewater-based epidemiology of COVID-19 in Hong Kong Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding Enteric involvement of coronaviruses: is faecal-oral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 possible? Digestive system is a potential route of COVID-19: an analysis of single-cell coexpression pattern of key proteins in viral entry process Prevalence and Persistent Shedding of Fecal SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Patients With COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin Early warning of COVID-19 via wastewater-based epidemiology: potential and bottlenecks Extra-pulmonary viral shedding in H7N9 Avian Influenza patients Depicting SARS-CoV-2 faecal viral activity in association with gut microbiota composition in patients with COVID-19 Note: Please see the Data section in the main text for more explanations of the variables.