key: cord-0796857-yfon9lye authors: Cahill, R. A.; Dalli, J.; Khan, M.; Flood, M.; Nolan, K. title: Solving the problems of gas leakage at laparoscopy date: 2020-08-27 journal: Br J Surg DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11977 sha: c2a82568f04337dc7e0d1aa85604ab7742ba56e0 doc_id: 796857 cord_uid: yfon9lye Gas leakage during minimally invasive surgery is an aerosolization hazard. Sensitive optical and thermographic imaging can demonstrate and differentiate between mechanistic categories, enabling engineering solutions to fortify surgical care against pollutants and pathogens affecting operating room teams. [Image: see text] The COVID-19 pandemic has focused attention on surgical access 1,2 , with many surgeons [3] [4] [5] and professional bodies 6 abandoning minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for emergency and elective procedures, even in healthcare systems with preserved capability. The reason cited is concern over the aerosolization hazard from surgical gases and airborne transmission of infection. In the face of this challenge, to maintain the advantages of MIS to patients, protection of both the surgical team and environment is required 7 . This has already begun, with protocols emerging for more mindful, deliberate practice with respect to pneumoperitoneum management, combined with use of controlled, filtered insufflation and smoke evacuation systems 8, 9 . However, to fully address safe MIS, a better understanding of gas leakage is essential. To illustrate the full extent of the issue and to establish clinically useful modelling tools, a series of clinical and experimental explorations regarding surgical airflow around laparoscopic, robotic and transanal access sites was performed. These studies were performed with Institutional ethics review board approval (AEROSOLVE, IRB 1/378/2172). For clinical qualitative assessment, a near-infrared camera (FLIR GF343; FLIR Systems, West Malling, Kent, UK), spectrally attuned to the absorption wavelength of carbon dioxide to enable its visualization by the absorption δ, was used to observe both elective and emergency surgery performed by standard and robotic-assisted laparoscopy and transanal minimally invasive surgery. Experimentally, a high-fidelity laparoscopy model using fresh porcine cadaver was established for operation (diagnostic laparoscopy, cholecystectomy and small bowel examination), with standard instrumentation employed by experienced surgeons and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. To characterize and quantify gas leaks in this model, high-speed Schlieren optical imaging, a passive imaging method whereby changes in refractive index can be visualized directly (Fig. S1 , supporting information), was applied continuously. Leaks were studied at three different pneumoperitoneal pressures (8, 12 and 25 mmHg) using three different brands of trocar (Applied Medical, Santa Margarita, California, USA, Conmed, Utica, New York, USA; and Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) in separate models, with recording by monochromatic camera (Phantom ® v311/VEO4k 990; Vision Research, Wayne, New Jersey, USA). To demonstrate the droplet propulsion capability of the gas streams, a laparoscopic nebulizer (Aerogen ® Pro Solo, 1-5-μm mist; Aerogen, Dangan, Galway, Ireland) humidified intra-abdominal gas and high-definition videography was used to study droplet escape via transillumination in a darkened room. Post hoc image processing included optical flow-based estimation of indicative leak velocity flow field using feature tracking, and two-dimensional cross-correlation image flow to predict flow patterns (laminar or turbulent, by Reynold's number calculation) and quantify volumes and evolution of observed flow structures indicative of microdroplet kinematics (allowing approximation of particle path lines). Management of leaks by compensatory local ring vacuums (Leaktrap™, Palliare Surgical, Dangan, Galway, Ireland) was investigated using the same methodology. Considerable gas leakage was observed during all procedures ( Fig. S2 and Video S1, supporting information), and was reliably and repeatedly evident experimentally ( Fig. 1 ; Video S2, supporting information). Such trocar leaks are capable of actual droplet propulsion ( Fig. S3 and Video S3, supporting information). Trocar valve fatigue developed in Leaks in each category can be continuous or intermittent and affected (either exacerbated or relieved) by pneumoperitoneal pressure changes. Examples are shown in Fig. 1, and Figs S2-S5 and Videos S1-S5 (supporting information). some ports experimentally after as few as three instrument exchanges and, interestingly, was worst at lower pneumoperitoneal pressures (data not shown). Mechanistically, leaks can be grouped into three categories ( Table 1) . Volumes and flow patterns of gas leaks are shown in Table 2 , and Fig. S4 and Video S4 (supporting information), along with particle trajectories, showing mean velocities reaching 5 m/s and estimated leak flow rates up to 20 l/min. Instrument insertion was associated with greater turbulence of leak stream and volume (litres per minute) than withdrawal, with pressure exacerbating both. Observed jet streams tended to turbulence and were eliminated at trocar top and base by ring vacuums (15 l/min, 10 kPa suction) ( Fig. S5 and Video S5, supporting information). The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated a problem with contemporary MIS practice. The imperative now is to improve the fundamentals of MIS, so that further such threats cause less systemic shock and best patient care continues. In the hierarchy of hazard control measures 10 , engineering controls trump administrative and personal protection equipment controls, and rank below risk elimination only. This is needed whether or not the peak of the pandemic passes soon as resumption of normal services will involve patients at ongoing community risk of infection for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, even if it could be proved that COVID-19 is not transmissible from virions detectable in blood and enteric content (and perhaps also peritoneal fluid) 2-13 , the precedent now is that laparoscopy may be discarded in the face of any other transmissible epidemic. There is already enough evidence to support improved practice regarding gas management, irrespective of infection risk (including non-COVID infections) 14, 15 . Some estimates suggest that MIS in the USA alone creates more carbon dioxide pollution than some countries 16 , and that the risks of inhaling surgical smoke equate to those of passive smoking 17 . This work has developed tools and models for the assessment of gas leakage. Carbon dioxide leakage is common, occurs at considerable velocity (equivalent to that occurring with a human cough) and volume, and is capable of transmitting particles into the operating room environment. Although some of the leaks are unsurprising, others, such as gas escape through hollow spaces needed for energy and lever transmission, were unexpected. Some of the known mismatch between carbon dioxide volumes needed to maintain pneumoperitoneum (200-400 ml/min) and the amount absorbed systemically (40 ml/min) has already been explained, showing how operative carbon dioxide consumption rates are in the order of 200-300 l/h (and higher with Airseal ® (Conmed) insufflation 18 ). Because of powerful insufflation, considerable ongoing gas leakage occurs without disruption of operative view or fluency. Although intentional leaks are controllable, technological development is needed to address the inadvertent and inbuilt ones. Different leaks occur simultaneously and therefore it is insufficient to focus on any one category alone. Furthermore, although current guidelines help in terms of intentional leaks, some leakage will still occur in this category despite adherence to best practice. Patient factors such as obesity can also confound; even if ideal incisions are made at the start, skin or fascial stretch can occur during the procedure, especially with extreme instrument movement. Smoke evacuation solutions are also only partially effective. Leaks occurring through functional trocars and instrumentation as well as trocar valve fatigue (interestingly, worsened by lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum) show some limitations of the present recommendations. Without more fundamental address, high-level personal protective equipment (perhaps powered air-purifying respirators 19 ) will continue to be needed to mitigate the hazards of pathogen and pollutant contamination. With the indicative data generated by these assessments, many practice and technological solutions can begin development, but further modelling is needed for precision. Smaller trocars and instruments let lower volumes of gas escape but their higher velocity accentuates droplet trajectory. Although initial mechanical adaptations can be configured as a universal add-on for rapid deployment (including lower device classification), next-generation design is needed within trocars for use in conjunction with filtered gas evacuators and low-pressure insufflators. Whatever the exact method of amelioration, the constructs need to be robust, widely acceptable and available. Their use could also extend to other aerosol-generating interventions such as endoscopy 20 and airway intubation 21 . Historically, there has been complacency about gas pollution in the operating room from endolaparoscopy 22, 23 . Although concern exists that complete eradication of cavity gas loss from instrument insertion, manipulation and withdrawal through trocars is impossible, the issues can be markedly improved. Within the stark context of a global pandemic with high healthcare staff infection rates and the cessation of elective surgical practice worldwide, the present data should inspire change. Minimally invasive surgery and the novel coronavirus outbreak: lessons learned in China and Italy Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: operating room suggestions from an international Delphi process Laparoscopy at all costs? Not now during COVID-19 and not for acute care surgery and emergency colorectal surgery: a practical algorithm from a hub tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Lombardy The possible impact of COVID-19 on colorectal surgery in Italy Is the use of laparoscopy in COVID-19 epidemic free of risk? Intercollegiate General Surgery Guideance on COVID-19 Update Is it too premature to recommend against laparoscopic emergency surgery in COVID-19 patients? SAGES. SAGES and EAED Recommendations Regarding Surgical Response to COVID-19 Crisis Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19 Hierarchy of Controls SARS-Cov-2 in peritoneal fluid: an important finding in the Covid-19 pandemic COVID-19: gastrointestinal manifestations and potential fecal-oral transmission Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2 Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists Particle and carbon dioxide concentration levels in a surgical room conditioned with a window/wall air-conditioning system Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: an estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint An analysis of surgical smoke plume components, capture, and evacuation Aerosols at endolaparoscopy and robotic surgery Prospective comparison between the AirSeal ® System valve-less trocar and a standard Versaport™ plus V2 trocar in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy Powered Air Purifying Respirators (PAPR) for the protection of surgeons during operative tasks: a user perspective assessment Ambient air pollution in gastrointestinal endoscopy unit Reducing droplet spread during airway manipulation: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore The dangers of electrosurgical smoke to operating room personnel: a review Risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke plume: a review of the literature The authors acknowledge the following equipment loans: v311 Phantom high-speed camera from the Thermal Management Group, Bell Labs (Dublin, Ireland), and Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.