key: cord-0792492-qwkul28p
authors: Timon, Dr Charles; O'Ceallaigh, Brian; Siney, Edel; McInerney, Mr Niall
title: Full title: Rapid implementation of virtual hand therapy clinics during COVID-19, opportunities for the future
date: 2021-07-06
journal: JPRAS Open
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.06.002
sha: 08c74991c6d57af2ec5fd6511db250f1a9dd8b9d
doc_id: 792492
cord_uid: qwkul28p

nan

Covid-19 has posed many difficulties for health services and hand therapy must adapt to these challenges. In Ireland non-urgent outpatient hospital services were closed overnight to slow the virus' spread (1) . This proposed a challenge to post-operative and trauma services providing vital outpatient care. Hand Therapy is fundamental to achieving good results from hand surgery, and crucial after procedures such as tendon repairs, both in motivating patients and monitoring progress (2). Many of these patients require early hand therapy to optimise their outcomes. Furthermore, University Hospital Galway's hand therapy department provides a supraregional service to patients from seven hospitals in Ireland across eight counties to an estimated population of 730,513 people (3).

Video consultations were identified as a means of continuing to provide this service during the initial lockdown, offering patients access to essential post op care, while minimising social contacts. Removing patients' inconvenience and travel costs are obvious advantages. Previously described barriers to acceptance included data security, data governance, technology failure and threat to the therapists' role and skills (4) . Following the introduction of hand therapy virtual consultations we wanted to assess patient satisfaction with the service and to assess if this model of care is suitable and satisfactory going forward.

Patients receiving hand therapy were prospectively enrolled and had video consultations between 12 th March 2020 and 30 th June 2020. Depending on their progress patients either had further video consultations arranged, were discharged from the service, or if there was a clinical concern an in-person appointment would be arranged. The Braun and Clarke approach was utilised for the thematic analysis of patient satisfaction for the qualitative data provided by the patients (5). 74 patients were sent the survey questions, 44 (59.6%) responded. The most common positive theme in the comments was relief of being spared what is often a significant and costly trip to the outpatients department, patients avoided having to drive or commute using public transport, pay for fuel/parking, take more than an hour off work, spend time in the waiting room etc. Furthermore, they were spared the stress of attending a hospital and potential COVID-19 exposure during a pandemic. All 44 patients agreed that the process was punctual and efficient. Some of the common challenges experienced included poor internet connection affecting communication and patient difficulty with the software/hardware. However the vast majority of patients commended that they found no challenges with the process.

The vast majority of patients were happy to use telehealth, and were comfortable using the software. All of the patients responded that they could interact comfortably with their therapist and the vast majority did not report difficulty seeing/hearing their therapist when asked. 43/44 (97.7%) patients indicated they would be happy to use telehealth for future consultations.

Long-term, the socio-economic benefits of virtual clinic are significant. Patients' save time and money. They spend less time away from their work/personal commitments. Less travelling also leads to less emissions and the associated environmental benefits.

Despite its success, virtual clinics will not always be able to fully replace face-to-face consultations with tactile feedback. Nine of the 44 patients (20.5%) did not find the virtual consultation to be equal to a face-to-face session. Looking at accessibility, 10/44 (22.7%) of patients required help from a friend/family member to use telehealth. There is also a cohort of patients, especially in rural north/western Ireland, that have inconsistent internet access. Virtual consultation also may be inappropriate with elderly patients, especially those with visual/ hearing difficulties.

As the need for telehealth services arose in response to COVID 19 social distancing guidance, this study was a prospective review of patient's experience of accessing health services using a telehealth medium. Consequently, our study cohort consisted of a group of patients with a wide variety of hand trauma injuries and severitiescomplex upper limb trauma such as complex bone fractures, tendon injuries, nerve injuries, burns, amputation, and minor injuries such as small joint dislocations, ligament injuries, mallet fingers, closed central slip ruptures, soft tissue injuries. However, despite the range of upper limb injury,, all participants reported high satisfaction with the telehealth hand therapy service and indicated support for using telehealth services for future health care needs.

In summary the vast majority of patients found the process user-friendly, communicated fluently and would be happy to use it again. As COVID-19 persists with no end to the concept of social distancing in sight, this is important as it ensures continuity of service in line with national guidelines. Furthermore, in the long term it could provide significant socio-economic benefits in the future as patients should not have to undergo the burden of travel, waiting-rooms, missing full days of work/family commitments etc. Further work is needed to compare outcomes to face-to-face consultation and to measure long-term effects and cost efficiency. 

Roawp. Hand Surgery in the UK Manpower, resources, standards and training. The British Society for Surgery of the Hand

Saolta University Health Care Group Operational Plan

Remote Home Visit: Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and potential benefits of using digital technology to undertake occupational therapy home assessments

What can "thematic analysis" offer health and wellbeing researchers? International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being