key: cord-0790737-x6h01nh8 authors: Wang, Jing; Xie, Wen-Peng; Lei, Yu-Qing; Yu, Ling-Shan; Wang, Zeng-Chun; Cao, Hua; Chen, Qiang title: Extraluminal Placement of a Bronchial Blocker Compared with Carbon Dioxide Artificial Pneumothorax in Infants Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery date: 2021-07-23 journal: Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00050 sha: 358fd2b3e015da2300dc01785a7bce235ccf486e doc_id: 790737 cord_uid: x6h01nh8 Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker compared with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) artificial pneumothorax in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: The study involved 33 infants (group A) who underwent one-lung ventilation (OLV) with extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker and 35 other infants (group B) who underwent CO(2) artificial pneumothorax. Clinical characteristics, the degree of lung collapse, and complications were compared. Results: The degree of lung collapse in group A was significantly higher than that in group B at T2 and T3. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of group B was significantly lower than that of group A at 10 min and 30 min after OLV. The partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) of group B was significantly higher than that of group A at 30 min after OLV. The incidence of hypotension in group B was higher than that in group A. Conclusion: Compared with CO(2) artificial pneumothorax, extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker is associated with a better degree of lung collapse, fewer episodes of hypotension, and lower PaCO(2) accumulation during OLV in infants undergoing VATS. In recent years, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been increasingly used in pediatric thoracic surgery. In this process, lung collapse is induced to provide an adequate surgical field of vision. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) artificial pneumothorax is usually used to provide adequate operating conditions for VATS. 1, 2) However, this method may lead to hemodynamic changes, such as hypotension. 3) The use of a bronchial blocker can induce collapse of the lung on the operative side of the chest, and the mode of ventilation can be changed at any time during the operation. The secretions of the lung on the operation side can be aspirated at any time, and this is widely applied with good effect. 4, 5) A fiberoptic bronchoscope is used to locate the bronchial blocker after bronchial blocker placement. As the airway diameter of infants is relatively small, it can be difficult to operate a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Bronchial blocker placement in the endotracheal tube may increase airway pressure and reduce sufficient ventilation. Therefore, during VATS in infants, a bronchial blocker can be placed outside the endotracheal tube for one-lung ventilation (OLV) to achieve lung collapse. [6] [7] [8] [9] In this study, the data of infants undergoing VATS in our hospital from February 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to compare the safety and feasibility of extraluminal bronchial blocker placement and CO 2 artificial pneumothorax in those patients. The Ethics Committee of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital approved this retrospective study. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical standards and its later amendments. From February 2018 to December 2020, data were collected for 68 children through the medical record system, including 33 children in the bronchial blocker group (group A) and 35 children in the CO 2 artificial pneumothorax group (group B). Relevant general clinical data were collected ( Table 1) . The inclusion criteria were as follows: the infants were aged 2-12 months and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy in our hospital; extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker or artificial pneumothorax with CO 2 was used to induce lung collapse; the patient's diagnosis was congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of lung sequestration; and the family members signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria were as follows: the patient had other severe medical conditions, such as pulmonary insufficiency or liver and kidney insufficiency; and the patient underwent alternative surgical procedures or was converted to conventional open-chest surgery intraoperatively. The family members of the patient were informed of the anesthetic and surgical options before the surgery, and different lung collapse options were selected according to the decision of the anesthesiologist and surgeon. All infants fasted for 4 hours and did not consume water for 2 hours. They were sedated with 0.1 mg/kg midazolam by intravenous injection. After entering the operating room, physiologic saline was infused. Heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiograph (ECG), and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) were monitored. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol at 2-3 mg/kg, fentanyl at 3-5 μg/kg, and rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg. In group A, the glottis was exposed under a visual laryngoscope after mask inhalation of oxygen for 2 minutes. The smallest 5F bronchial blocker (Hangzhou Tappa Medical Technology Co., Ltd.) was inserted into the trachea. An uncuffed endotracheal tube was also inserted into the trachea to place the bronchial blocker outside the endotracheal tube. The endotracheal tube was adjusted approximately 1-2 cm away from the carina of the trachea using a fiberoptic bronchoscope, and the bronchial blocker was guided into the pulmonary region of the operative side. Next, 1-3 mL of air was injected into the cuff of the bronchial blocker. The anesthesiologist auscultated both sides of the chest, and disappearance of the sound of pulmonary respiration on the operative side indicated that the bronchial blocker was in the correct position. In this study, the bronchial blocker was placed in the right main bronchus, the right middle and right lower bronchus, the left main bronchus, and the left lower bronchus, depending on the surgical scope. After the cuff was deflated, the endotracheal tube was connected to the anesthesia machine for two-lung mechanical ventilation. The following pressure control mode was adopted: fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) of 0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 3-5 mmHg, inspiratory/expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:1.5, tidal volume (VT) of 8-10 mL/kg, respiratory frequency (R) of 30-35 times per minute, and oxygen flow rate of 2-3 L/min. Before skin incision, a fiberoptic bronchoscope was used again to determine the position of the cuff of the bronchial blocker. After entering the thoracic cavity on the operative side, the correct amount of air was injected into the cuff of the bronchial blocker, and one-lung mechanical ventilation was performed. The following pressure control mode was adopted: FiO 2 of 0.8-1.0, PEEP of 3-5 mmHg, I:E ratio of 1:1.5, VT of 6-8 mL/kg, R of 30-35 times per minute, and oxygen flow rate of 2-3 L/min. No additional CO 2 insufflation was needed in this group. In group B, the endotracheal tube was inserted into the principal bronchus, and mechanical ventilation was performed after concordant auscultatory breath sounds were noted in both lungs. After the infant was in the lateral position, CO 2 insufflation (CO 2 pressure = 8-10 mmHg) was used to create an artificial pneumothorax inducing lung collapse on the operative field side. After anesthesia induction, the radial artery and right internal jugular vein were punctured and catheterized. The invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored, and blood samples were collected for blood gas analysis during the operation. Arterial oxygen saturation was maintained between 92% and 96%. Remifentanil at 0.1-0.5 μg/kg/min and 1-3% sevoflurane were used to maintain anesthesia during the operation. The doses of remifentanil and sevoflurane were adjusted according to the monitoring values of anesthesia depth and blood pressure changes, HR, and end-expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO 2 ). If necessary, rocuronium 0.1 mg/kg was added. Recruitment maneuvers were performed in all infants at the end of OLV before restarting two-lung ventilation (TLV). In this study, a lung recruitment maneuver was performed three times, with airway pressure sustained at 30 cm H 2 O for 15-20 s. 10) Notably, during the operation, norepinephrine at 0.01-0.05 μg/kg/ min was injected if the blood pressure was lower than 20% of the baseline. If the oxygen saturation was lower than 90%, OLV was suspended, double-lung ventilation was resumed, and the bronchial blocker position was checked. OLV was performed after oxygen saturation was restored to >96%. Data were collected from the computer record system, which included (1) general data such as age, sex, weight, time of OLV, length of drainage, and length of hospital stay; (2) the MAP of infants before OLV (T1), 10 min after OLV (T2), 30 min after OLV (T3), and 10 min after the end of OLV (T4); (3) the degree of lung collapse evaluated by the operating surgeon using a verbal rating scale from 0 (no lung deflation) to 10 (complete collapse) at the time of T2 and T3; 11) (4) incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia and hypotension during the operation (intraoperative hypoxemia was defined as SpO 2 <90%; hypotension was defined as blood pressure lower than 20% of the baseline); and (5) incidence of postoperative complications including pneumothorax, atelectasis, and chylothorax. An arterial blood sample was taken for blood gas analysis at T1, T2, T3, and T4 by the anesthetist during the operation. The PaCO 2 value, oxygenation index (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ), and alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (PA-aO 2 ) data were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (25.0 Version, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data with a normal distribution were presented as the mean ± SD, and differences were evaluated using the t-test. Nonparametric data were presented as medians, and differences were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum. Categorical variables were shown as frequencies (percentages), and differences were evaluated using the χ2 test. A comparison of pulmonary gas exchange parameters pre-OLV, during OLV, and post-OLV was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. A P value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The clinical information and outcomes of the two groups are shown in Table 1 . There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical parameters, including age, sex, weight, time of OLV, length of drainage, and length of hospital stay (P >0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in length of drainage and hospital stay (P >0.05). In group A, there were 14 cases of lobectomy, 15 cases OLV: one-lung ventilation of pulmonary segmentectomy, and 4 cases of partial pulmonary resection. In group B, there were 14 cases of lobectomy, 17 cases of pulmonary segmentectomy, and 4 cases of partial pulmonary resection. These results indicate that the two sets of data were comparable and homogeneous. The comparison of the degree of lung collapse scores between the two groups is shown in Table 2 . The degree of lung collapse score in group A was significantly higher than that in group B at T2 and T3 (P <0.001, z = -3.489 and P <0.001, z = -4.195). A comparison of hemodynamic parameters between the two groups is shown in Table 2 . There was no significant difference in MAP between the two groups at T1 and T4, but the MAP in group B was significantly lower than that in group A at T2 and T3 (P <0.001). There was no significant difference in HR between the two groups at any time point (P >0.05). A comparison of the PaCO 2 between the two groups is shown in Fig. 1 . There were no significant differences in PaCO 2 between the two groups at T1, T2, or T4. At T3, the PaCO 2 in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P <0.001). The comparison of PaO 2 /FiO 2 and PA-aO 2 between the two groups is shown in Fig. 2 . There were no significant differences in PaO 2 /FiO 2 and PA-aO 2 between the two groups at any time point. However, there were significant differences when comparing these parameters at different time points in each group. In group A, compared with T1, the PA-aO 2 The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups is shown in Table 3 . The hypotension incidence in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P <0.001). Hypoxemia occurred in both groups, but the incidence was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.80). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. Compared to conventional surgery, VATS is a minimally invasive method in thoracic surgery and has many advantages, such as a small incision, less postoperative pain, fewer postoperative complications, and a shorter hospital stay, promoting the postoperative recovery of patients. Therefore, VATS has been widely accepted by parents for their children. 12) During the operation, it is necessary to collapse the lung on the operating side to expose the surgical field of vision, which is needed and beneficial for the surgeon to perform the operation. Collapse of the unilateral lung during the operation can be implemented using a bronchial blocker, a doublelumen tube, and CO 2 artificial pneumothorax. However, the smallest model of the double-lumen tube is only suitable for children over 8 years old. 13) In VATS, intrathoracic positive pressure injection of CO 2 can provide adequate lung collapse and promote visual surgical field exposure. However, this approach may lead to the accumulation of CO 2 . 14,15) The use of a bronchial blocker is suitable for infants and young children. In general, the bronchial blocker is placed in the endotracheal tube and located via fiberoptic bronchoscope guidance. When infants undergo endotracheal intubation, an endotracheal tube of ID 3.5# or 4.0# is generally selected. Due to the limitation of the endotracheal tube's inner diameter, the fiberoptic bronchoscope and bronchial blocker cannot enter the endotracheal tube simultaneously. Therefore, we typically place the bronchial blocker outside the endotracheal tube to implement lung collapse for infants under 1 year old. In this study, a single-lumen endobronchial tube was used for endotracheal intubation in both groups. Lung collapse was induced during surgery via the compression of CO 2 flow or the bronchial blocker to provide surgical vision and operating space. At T2 and T3, the degree of lung collapse of group A was greater than that of group B, indicating that the visual surgical field exposed by the bronchial blocker was better than that by CO 2 artificial pneumothorax. Zheng et al. and Yan et al. reported that the use of a bronchial blocker for lung collapse provides an adequate surgical field of vision. 9, 16) The MAP of group B was significantly lower than that of group A at T2 and T3. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension in group B was significantly higher than that in group A. Mohtar et al. also reported no significant change in blood pressure before, during, or after bronchial blocker use. 17) We considered that the pressure of CO 2 during CO 2 artificial pneumothorax could compress the heart and large blood vessels, resulting in reduced cardiac blood volume, transient or persistent hypotension, and even the need to use vasoactive drugs. 18) At T3, the PaCO 2 of group B was significantly higher than that of group A. We believe that this finding might have been due to the accumulation of CO 2 in the chest cavity after 30 minutes of artificial pneumothorax in the infants of group B, which resulted in acidosis and elevated PaCO 2 levels in the arterial blood. This observation was consistent with the research of Lin et al. 14) However, there was no significant difference in PaCO 2 between the two groups at T4. The reason might be due to the following operations performed at the end of the surgery. First, OLV was stopped immediately, and TLV was resumed. Second, the CO 2 was evacuated from the infants' thoracic cavity by the surgeon. Third, the infant was switched from the lateral to the supine position, and the lung recruitment maneuver was carried out. It has been reported that lung recruitment maneuvers improve oxygenation during OLV. 19) Therefore, the PaO 2 and PaCO 2 levels were significantly improved in blood gas analysis 10 minutes after OLV. Fig. 1 The comparison of the PaCO 2 between the two groups. OLV: one-lung ventilation; PaCO 2 : partial pressure of carbon dioxide During OLV in infants in the lateral decubitus position, the risk of hypoxemia is higher due to increased V/Q mismatch, compression of the healthy-side lung, and collapse of the surgical-side lung with higher oxygen consumption. 20, 21) In this retrospective study, we observed no significant differences in the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio or PA-aO 2 between the two groups at any time point. However, at T2 and T3, the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio decreased, and the PA-aO 2 increased in both groups, indicating a change in pulmonary function and a higher risk of hypoxemia in OLV. At T4, when OLV was stopped for 10 minutes, the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio and PA-aO 2 returned to baseline levels. Hale et al. reported the same situation in infants undergoing OLV. 22) There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoxemia between the two groups in this study. The state of hypoxemia can be quickly improved by suspending the operation and performing TLV. This research had some limitations. The sample size included in this study was relatively small. In addition, our data collection might have been biased. Relatively, few indicators of pulmonary function were adopted in the study, a subjective rating scale was used to evaluate the degree of pulmonary collapse, and the data could have become biased in the recording process, which, in turn, could affect the accuracy of the results. In addition, this study was retrospective rather than a prospective case-control study, which limited its statistical power, but we still believe that the results have clinical significance. Future research should consider variations in factors and examine a larger sample to confirm our conclusions. This study showed that OLV with extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker is a safe choice for infants undergoing VATS. In our study, the gas exchange changed during OLV but returned to baseline following resumption of TLV. Compared with CO 2 artificial pneumothorax, OLV with extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker appears to provide a higher degree of surgeon-rated lung collapse, fewer episodes of significant hypotension, and lower PaCO 2 accumulation for infants undergoing VATS. The application of single-lumen endotracheal tube anaesthesia with artificial pneumothorax in thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO2 artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy Successful one-lung ventilation by blocking the right intermediate bronchus in a 7-year-old child: a case report Comparison of univent tube and EZ blocker in one lung ventilation; airway pressures and gas exchange Routine extraluminal use of the 5F Arndt endobronchial blocker for onelung ventilation in children up to 24 months of age Bending the rules: a novel approach to placement and retrospective experience with the 5 French Arndt endobronchial blocker in children <2 years A new technique to facilitate lung lavage for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in a 3-month-old infant: Bronchial-blocker-out-ofendotracheal-tube technique Extraluminal placement of the bronchial blocker in infants undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled study The safety and efficacy of sustained inflations as a lung recruitment maneuver in pediatric intensive care unit patients Bronchial blocker lung collapse technique: nitrous oxide for facilitating lung collapse during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker One lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery Anesthetic management for lobectomy of a 2-month-old infant with bronchogenic cyst: case report along with review of literature A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO2 artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy Efficacy of artificial pneumothorax under two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer Effects of bronchial blockers on one-lung ventilation in general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trail Anesthetic management of thoracoscopic resection of lung lesions in small children Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax under twolung ventilation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the prone position Positive endexpiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers during one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Pediatric thoracic anesthesia Airway structure, function and development in health and disease Lung separation in children: Options and impact on gas exchange and lung compliance We appreciate all doctors and nurses in our center for fruitful advice and discussions. We hope humans eventually defeat COVID-19. All authors declared that they had no competing interests.