key: cord-0790467-cwtdkylo authors: Chen, Justin A.; Chung, Wei-Jean; Young, Sarah K.; Tuttle, Margaret C.; Collins, Michelle B.; Darghouth, Sarah L.; Longley, Regina; Levy, Raymond; Razafsha, Mahdi; Kerner, Jeffrey C.; Wozniak, Janet; Huffman, Jeff C. title: COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: Early outpatient experiences and implications for the future date: 2020-07-09 journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.07.002 sha: a40a6b915796dff394e5d17c9d3dda28e33f339e doc_id: 790467 cord_uid: cwtdkylo The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically transformed the U.S. healthcare landscape. Within psychiatry, a sudden relaxing of insurance and regulatory barriers during the month of March 2020 enabled clinicians practicing in a wide range of settings to quickly adopt virtual care in order to provide critical ongoing mental health supports to both existing and new patients struggling with the pandemic's impact. In this article, we briefly review the extensive literature supporting the effectiveness of telepsychiatry relative to in-person mental health care, and describe how payment and regulatory challenges were the primary barriers preventing more widespread adoption of this treatment modality prior to COVID-19. We then review key changes that were implemented at the federal, state, professional, and insurance levels over a one-month period that helped usher in an unprecedented transformation in psychiatric care delivery, from mostly in-person to mostly virtual. Early quality improvement data regarding virtual visit volumes and clinical insights from our outpatient psychiatry department located within a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center reflect both the opportunities and challenges of virtual care for patients and providers. Finally, we provide clinical suggestions for optimizing telepsychiatry based on our experience, make a call for advocacy to continue the reduced insurance and regulatory restrictions affecting telepsychiatry even once this public health crisis has passed, and pose research questions that can help guide optimal utilization of telepsychiatry as mainstay or adjunct of outpatient psychiatric treatment now and in the future. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f included poor reimbursement and regulatory hassles (7) , which made this modality of treatment impractical for many health systems. Psychiatry was an early telehealth pioneer, with the earliest documented use of videoconferencing to support psychotherapeutic interventions and training occurring in the 1950s at the University of Nebraska (8) . Psychiatrist Thomas Dwyer first proposed the term telepsychiatry in 1973 to describe virtual consultation services from an academic medical center to another clinical site in Boston (9) . With advances in technology, adoption of telepsychiatry slowly increased in the ensuing decades (8) . Between 2010 and 2017, use of telepsychiatry by state agencies increased from 15.2% to 29.2% (10). A 2012 article reported that telepsychiatry was the second most practiced form of telemedicine in the world after teleradiology (11) . In 2015, the American Psychiatric Association formally convened a Committee on Telepsychiatry (12). Today, mental health services rendered via electronic means are variably referred to as telepsychiatry, telemental health, virtual care, etc. Some of these terms refer to a range of electronic connection, such as asynchronous electronic visits, electronic consultations, and audio-only visits. In this paper, the term telepsychiatry is used to refer to real-time video and/or audio connection between mental health clinicians and patients, including mental health services delivered by telephone. Systematic reviews have found that telepsychiatry is as effective as traditional in-person interventions across psychiatric diagnoses and patient populations, and concluded that users report high satisfaction (5, 8) .Telepsychiatry is efficacious in psychiatrically underserved minority (13) , veteran/military, pediatric, and rural populations (10, 14) . However, prior to the state of emergency created by COVID-19, the majority of U.S. mental health providers had not J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f engaged in telehealth services (15) (16) (17) . A representative recent study of 164 psychologists found that while 74% of the sample viewed telehealth as a useful means of intervention, only 26% had actually used it (16) . Among psychiatrists, from 2014-2016, the percentage who had engaged in telepsychiatry ranged from a low of 0.1% in Massachusetts to a high of 24.2% in North Dakota (18) . Telepsychiatry is utilized at higher rates in areas with more limited access to healthcare providers (10). Contributors to this heterogenous uptake are numerous, but mostly relate to the confusing patchwork of government regulations and insurance coverage policies that led to significant restrictions on reimbursements for services, as well as ambiguity on the part of providers and patients alike. Medicare began only in 2019 to reimburse limited telehealth visits, including Virtual Check-ins (brief phone calls initiated by the patient) and E-visits (communication via a secure patient portal) (1), but required that patients live in a designated rural area and travel to a qualified site to hold a reimbursable video visit (1) . Since CMS sets the standard for many commercial insurance carriers, it followed that only a few of these covered telehealth, and often reimbursed for it at lower rates than in-person visits. The impact of inconsistent, inadequate reimbursement on preventing the widespread adoption of telepsychiatry cannot be overstated. Bashshur and colleagues commented, -Limited or lack of reimbursement has been identified as telemedicine's ‗Gordian knot' and one of the major reasons for the slow diffusion of telemedicine‖ (19). Additional CMS-mandated obstacles to telehealth included: 1) requirement for a previously established relationship, i.e., an in-person initial evaluation; 2) requirement that during the telehealth visit, the patient must be physically located in the state in which the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f provider is licensed; and 3) requirement that the visit must be conducted using HIPAA-compliant software. The pandemic's rapid escalation prompted swift, widespread changes throughout healthcare. In our hospital, non-urgent medical and mental health visits were initially cancelled or postponed. However, psychiatric services remained important for managing pandemicassociated exacerbations in pre-existing psychiatric conditions (20) , as well as to address newonset psychological distress related to increased social isolation, financial and employment instability (21), significant anxiety and uncertainty, and grief. Additionally, healthcare providers working in demanding, high-risk situations are susceptible to a wide range of mental health conditions, including Acute Stress Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (22) . Telepsychiatry became a critical method to ensure continued access to essential outpatient mental health treatment. These clinical concerns have been matched by a strong financial incentive to adopt telehealth. Without it, entire departments and practices would have faced an indefinite cessation of clinical activities and income, as has been seen in procedural and interventional medical specialties, with potentially devastating repercussions for revenue and fiscal viability. In order to adequately address these challenges, community mental health clinics, individual and group private practices, large healthcare organizations, and academic psychiatry departments have had to rapidly transform into virtual practices. This process has required adopting new telehealth platforms or updating existing platforms to accommodate large volumes; J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f training clinicians, support staff, and patients regarding the use of new technology; and identifying alternative options for clinicians and patients unable to access required technology. The month of March 2020 saw numerous payer and regulatory changes that significantly relaxed restrictions on telehealth during the COVID-19 public health emergency, enabling rapid expansion of telepsychiatry services. On March 17, 2020, as part of a bipartisan emergency COVID-19 spending bill passed by Congress, CMS temporarily relaxed several requirements for the provision of and payment for telehealth services to Medicare patients 1 . These changes are summarized in Table 1 . Additional obstacles to telehealth and telepsychiatry have been relaxed. These include federal regulations governing HIPAA-compliant telehealth platforms, controlled substance prescriptions, and laboratory requirements for certain medications, summarized in Table 2 . The rapidity and comprehensiveness of these changes were unprecedented in the field of psychiatry. Major professional societies quickly posted concise and comprehensive updates on their websites to assist clinicians with the transition to telepsychiatry 2 . interest in telehealth has also significantly increased, as reflected in web search data (31) . The (the highest number in the hospital, followed by oncology and pediatrics). Drastically increased demand for telehealth in the context of COVID-19 quickly exposed the technological limitations of the existing platform, including failed and dropped connections, inconsistent video quality, and an unpredictable audio system. To meet patients' needs, clinicians shifted variably to telephone calls or commercial platforms such as doxy.me, Zoom, and Doximity. Departmental quality improvement data suggest that these efforts led to a near-complete preference for telepsychiatry to continue to provide much-needed care, even for higher-risk patients who otherwise would not have been considered for this treatment modality (33) . In our experience, many clinicians have reported a higher average acuity on their outpatient caseloads to compensate for limitations in community resources. The impact of these changes on clinicians, including potential liability concerns, will be important to monitor and address. The undeniable advantage of telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic is limiting viral transmission. Virtual care is particularly impactful for patients and providers who are immunocompromised or have other underlying health vulnerabilities. In addition to infection control, telepsychiatry has demonstrated a number of clinical benefits, described in Table 3 . For J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f example, early quality improvement data from our department suggest that no-show rates have decreased by 20% between the immediate pre-COVID period (January and February, 2020) and the COVID period (April and May, 2020), likely due to decreased logistical barriers to access. Our clinicians have anecdotally observed that telepsychiatry may be beneficial for specific conditions. Patients with psychiatric pathologies that interfere with their ability to leave home-e.g., immobilizing depression, anxiety, agoraphobia, and/or time-consuming obsessivecompulsive rituals-are able to access care more consistently. Some clinicians caring for patients at risk for violence and behavioral dysregulation report a greater sense of personal safety with virtual care. Telepsychiatry also facilitates new and beneficial treatment frames, for example permitting meeting at more frequent time intervals and for briefer visits to manage patients in crisis or undergoing medication titration. Eliminating the need to travel to a psychiatry clinic can increase privacy and therefore decrease stigma-related barriers to treatment, potentially bringing care to many more patients in need. It will be important to attempt to corroborate these early clinical observations through more systematic research in the future. Telepsychiatry also has disadvantages, summarized in Table 3 . More frequent disruptions, difficulty reading nonverbal communications, and increased effort required to establish rapport have all been previously reported (5, 8) and are anecdotally confirmed by our clinicians. Already-vulnerable patients such as the poor, the elderly, and those located in rural areas will face further health service disparities due to the -digital divide‖ (37). Additionally, it remains to be demonstrated whether and for whom audio/video-based telehealth treatment is superior to audio-only telehealth treatment. • Choose a quiet location away from other people and street noise (38) . • Invest in a comfortable chair and desk and/or equipment that allows for good posture for extended periods. • Make sure your background is neutral (e.g., not facing into a busy part of your house) (38) . • Eliminate intrusion from pets and other household members. • Consider using headphones to increase privacy of the conversation. • Be mindful of the time and set up clocks in your telepsychiatry practice space that will be visible to you during visits. Technology setup: • Minimize electronic distractions when performing clinical care. Maximize your telehealth platform's window to hide other applications (e.g., email, web browsers). Ensure that pop-up notifications from other applications, particularly text and email, are turned off. • Set up your screen to lead your eyes close to your camera as naturally as possible. Looking at the camera will appear to the patient that you are looking at them, while looking at the screen is likely to appear that you are looking down or away from the patient. • If you are going to type during the session, try to arrange your various windows in such a manner that the video screen can remain on top (some telehealth apps have an option that forces the video screen to the front.) This way you can continue to see your patient even while typing in a different window. • Acknowledge the shift in treatment frame and potential awkwardness of virtual care, while also remaining open and curious to potential benefits. This can help model the types of adaptability and flexibility that we also wish to see in our patients (38) . • Develop your own systems and procedures for providing telehealth (e.g. consistent platform, URL for patient to access, etc.), and communicate these as soon as possible to patients. In the midst of so many changes, a sense of clarity and routine can be reassuring for patients and clinicians alike. • Acknowledge when care is disrupted by technology issues and establish a back-up plan if the video connection is lost, such as resorting to phone contact. • Determine your desired response to patients' inquiries about your own reactions to the pandemic in advance. If the conversation strays too far into the clinician's personal life, the clinician can gently redirect the discussion back to the patient's presenting concerns (e.g., -You are right, it is a really unsettling time for everyone. I am doing all right overall and appreciate your concern. Tell me how it's been affecting you.‖) • Determine expectations with patients as early as possible. Consider matters such as: ○ How to communicate if late in the virtual system ○ Expectations that a patient be seated for the session, rather than laying on a bed or walking/driving (38) ○ Expectations of the patient's space to offer a level of privacy/minimal distraction, if feasible Clinician self-management: • Seek regular peer supervision to normalize challenges and share best practices. • Seek consultation particularly around matters related to risk. • Stay abreast of recommendations from professional organizations. • Be extra attentive to self-care, even when typical activities are limited by COVID-19. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f • Schedule your day intentionally, leaving space for breaks, lunch, etc. Recognize that patients may show up for appointments more consistently, and plan breaks accordingly (38) . • Take visual breaks and look away from the computer screen for intervals recommended by eye care specialists. For the past five years, researchers have predicted an imminent -tipping point‖ for telehealth, such that any acceleration in use would result in this modality becoming widespread (37, 39). The COVID-19 pandemic may well represent this tipping point. Over the past month, both clinicians and patients have gained skill and experience with telehealth out of necessity. There is no clear end to this arrangement in sight. After any subsequent waves of COVID-19 subside, we are likely to remain in a -new normal,‖ in which telehealth remains a prominent vehicle for mainstream psychiatric treatment delivery. However, questions remain about how this will be operationalized. The ability of healthcare systems to continue to provide telehealth depends on the stakeholders that collectively relaxed regulations and supported reimbursements for telehealth over the past 1-2 months. Third-party payers had previously reimbursed for telehealth services at lower rates than in-person, and some did not cover them at all. Many clinicians, clinics, and patients are eager to support expansion of telepsychiatry, but are wary that permissions for COVID-19 may be revoked. During this crisis, certain protective regulations have been J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f recognized as barriers to treatment, including clozapine monitoring requirements and restrictions on the prescription of controlled substances. Easing these rules gives patients and prescribers more flexibility and arguably has improved quality and safety of care. It is unclear what rationale regulatory bodies and insurers will employ to decide which prior limitations, if any, should be reinstated. Pressure to maintain changes which have facilitated the safety and quality of patient care must come from clinicians and patients who recognize the benefits of this new model of care. Given the robust evidence supporting real-world safety and effectiveness of telehealth, and potential for significant benefits to patient care, we encourage diverse stakeholders to join together to advocate for continued adequate reimbursement, relaxed restrictions, and widespread utilization of telehealth in the post-COVID period. When routine in-person care again becomes feasible post-COVID, new questions will emerge regarding the appropriate place of virtual care in the mental health system. In a minority of clinical situations, reliance on telehealth visits may prevent positive or needed treatment changes-e.g., when in-person sessions may be beneficial for a person who struggles with behavioral activation or overcoming anxious avoidance. In these cases, telepsychiatry could introduce a subtle means for avoiding positive engagement and exposure. Further studies are needed to compare specific outcomes for in-person versus remote care, especially as related to specific conditions, including posttraumatic illnesses, personality disorders, psychotic disorders, and substance use disorders, which may be more challenging to manage well through virtual care, but could also benefit from the greater flexibility of this modality. The ability to connect with psychiatric services from anywhere may impact patient engagement and commitment to the process (e.g., a patient conducting a session lying in bed, while running errands, or playing with his or her children). How patients and clinicians negotiate personal boundaries within their homes can be a creative and dynamic process. Future studies should evaluate the extent to which these issues impact patients' ability to seek care, as well as clinicians' ability to deliver care (40) and shape telehealth practice guidelines. New regulatory and risk management guidelines will need to be developed regarding the decision between inperson vs. virtual care and phone vs. video visits. Other questions have also emerged that bear further research. What types of patients respond particularly well to virtual rather than in-person visits? Are there differences by gender, race, and other individual factors outside of psychiatric conditions? Is video-based telehealth necessarily superior to audio-only (i.e., telephone appointments)? What are the financial implications of widespread adoption of telehealth, taking into account potential benefits including increases in mental health service utilization, concomitant decreases in morbidity and mortality from psychiatric illness, decreases in lost productivity related to not needing to take time off work to commute to a provider's office, and decreases in no-show rates? The current transformation in the psychiatric care landscape poses significant implications not just for patients, but also for providers. Early survey results in our department suggest that even as cities and healthcare organizations enter into successive phases of reopening, our hospital-based outpatient clinicians have expressed a clear preference to continue to provide the majority of their care remotely (i.e., virtually from off campus.) Reasons cited J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f include personal health concerns limiting exposure to public transportation and the hospital environment, decreased commute times, and flexibility of scheduling around personal obligations, including childcare. The research questions described above will be key for helping to guide personal and administrative decision-making and best practices regarding the optimal balance of virtual vs. in-person care, tailored to specific patient and provider characteristics. Assuming telehealth continues to be reimbursed comparably to in-person care, the question of whether a given appointment should be conducted virtually, or even via video versus telephone-only, will likely become a routine component of treatment planning. As with other parts of mental health treatment, a thoughtful, individualized decision-making process will be necessary. Consideration should be given to patient diagnosis, level of functioning, commitment to care, and other factors. In addition, providers' individual preferences related to medical conditions, family considerations, and the potential fatiguing impacts of increased screen time and decreased no-show rates, are all important to consider in assessing the long-term sustainability and efficacy of telepsychiatry. The COVID-19 pandemic has provoked unprecedented changes in healthcare delivery. Among other changes, this crisis has resulted in widespread and nearly wholesale adoption of telepsychiatry, made possible by payment parity and reduced regulations. Early analyses suggest that these changes have enabled mental health clinicians to continue to provide vital care at a challenging time. Although payer and regulatory changes may have initially been intended to be temporary, their effects are likely to be felt for the longer-term, especially if reimbursements can J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f be maintained. This would accord with the robust literature supporting telepsychiatry's effectiveness and superiority to traditional in-person care in some cases. While some hospitals, clinics, and clinicians were better prepared than others, we are now all becoming experts in this model of care and learning the versatility and limits of our trade. We are privileged to provide a crucial service during a crisis when so many resources are unavailable to those in need. With telepsychiatry, we have a small glimpse into details of patients' personal lives that were previously only available to practitioners performing home visits. While boundaries remain vital, there is an inherent benefit to simply being in connection with others. Our academic medical center psychiatry outpatient group has found that adapting to the challenges of telepsychiatry does not require entirely new approaches, but rather, greater Medicare Telemedicine Healthcare Provider Fact Sheet CMS.gov: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Telecare collaborative management of chronic pain in primary care: a randomized clinical trial The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review A Systematic Review of the Use of Telepsychiatry in Acute Settings Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes Top health industry issues of 2020: will digital start to show an ROI? : PwC Health Research Institute Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution Usefulness of telepsychiatry: A critical evaluation of videoconferencingbased approaches Telepsychiatry: psychiatric consultation by interactive television Telepsychiatry Use in U.S. Mental Health Facilities Effectiveness and feasibility of telepsychiatry in resource constrained environments? A systematic review of the evidence The Effectiveness of Telepsychiatry-Based Culturally Sensitive Collaborative Treatment for Depressed Chinese American Immigrants: A Randomized Controlled Trial The State and Sustainability of Telepsychiatry Programs Telemedicine for Mental Health in the United States: Making Progress, Still a Long Way to Go Survey of psychologists' telebehavioral health practices: Technology use, ethical issues, and training needs Demographic, organizational, and clinical practice predictors of U.S. psychologists' use of telepsychology Sustaining and realizing the promise of telemedicine Mental Health Strategies to Combat the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Beyond Paranoia and Panic The Role of Telehealth in Reducing the Mental Health Burden from COVID-19 Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease Medicare Telehealth Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) CMS.gov: Centers for Governor Oot, editor. mass.gov: Commonwealth of Massachusetts; 2020. 25. Ream S. APL 20-009 -Reimbursement for Telehealth Services. In: Care DoMH, editor. cmadocs.org: State of California Health and Human Services Agency; 2020. 26. Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth Remote Communications During the COVID-19 Nationwide Public Health Emergency hhs.gov: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Department of Justice; 2020 3 Telehealth Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Pandemic2020 Mainous Iii A. Population-Level Interest and Telehealth Capacity of US Hospitals in Response to COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Google Search and National Hospital Survey Data Why are you so slow? -Misattribution of transmission delay to attributes of the conversation partner at the far-end Repurposing Psychiatry During the COVID-19 Pandemic 10% of Americans don't use the internet. Who are they? pewresearch.org: Pew Research Center Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study State of Telehealth Tips and Tricks to Start Telehealth Tomorrow Telepsychiatry: Effective, Evidence-Based, and at a Tipping Point in Health Care Delivery? boundaries and smart homes for health: An ethnographic study MD: Conceptualization, methodology, writing -original draft, writing -review & editing PhD: Conceptualization, writing -original draft, writing -review & editing. Sarah K. Young, PsyD: Writing -original draft MD: Writing -original draft PhD: Writing -original draft, writing -review & editing. Regina Longley, BA: Writing -original draft PsyD: Writing -original draft MD: Writing -original draft MD: Writing -original draft MD: Writing -Review & Editing MD: Writing -Review & Editing