key: cord-0788113-l9fffara
authors: Cavaillon, Jean-Marc; Osuchowski, Marcin
title: COVID-19 and earlier pandemics, sepsis, and vaccines: A historical perspective
date: 2021-05-18
journal: nan
DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.04.003
sha: 235b02fcb69ebc7202ff199919f8488329a20b42
doc_id: 788113
cord_uid: l9fffara

Humanity has regularly faced the threat of epidemics and pandemics over the course of history. Successful attempts to protect populations were initially made with the development of new vaccines, such as those against plague and cholera, under the leadership of the bacteriologist Waldemar Haffkine. Vaccines have led to the complete eradication of smallpox and bovine plague and a major reduction in other infectious diseases including diphtheria, typhoid fever, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type B meningitis. While a few coronaviruses have been identified that seasonally infect humans by causing mild symptoms, the emergence of a new zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly triggered the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic responsible for widespread mortality. The severe phenotypes of COVID-19 resemble a previous infectious threat that was initially designated as hospital fever and puerperal fever, presently known as sepsis. A SARS-CoV-2 infection has frequently been considered as a form of viral sepsis (owing to common features with bacterial sepsis) but is also associated with an array of specific and unique symptoms. Rapid progress in anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development, in particular, the design of efficient messenger RNA (mRNA) and recombinant adenovirus vaccines, is crucial for curbing the pandemic.

respectively [ Figure 1 ]. [2, 3] The first case outside China was reported in Thailand (January 13, 2020) and the first case in the USA was reported on January 21, 2020. The genetic sequence of this new SARS-CoV-2 was released early [ Figure 1 ]. Based on its homology with previously identified SARS-CoV and existing knowledge on SARS-CoV-1, the nature of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor [angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)] was rapidly determined.

While an estimated 3204 coronaviruses exist in bats, [4] only six have been identified in humans to date, including two alpha coronaviruses (229E and NL63) and two beta coronaviruses (OC43 and HKU1) that trigger common colds. In 2003, a different coronavirus epidemic caused by the SARS-CoV-1 virus emerged in Guangdong, China. Symptoms analogous to the common cold, such as low-grade fever, muscle aches, and dry cough, were the first indicators of infection, frequently followed by unilateral or bilateral pneumonia. A total of 8096 people in 29 countries got SARS and 774 of them died. [5] In 2012, another coronavirus was identified in Saudi Arabia as the cause of the so-called "Middle East respiratory syndrome" (MERS-CoV) associated with a wide range of symptoms, such as mild fever and respiratory signs, upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhea, and weakness to lethargy. Severe cases showed progressive infection of the lungs and respiratory failure, renal failure, and multiple organ failure. A total of 2442 cases were reported, leading to 842 deaths. [6] 

The word "sepsis" means putrefaction in Greek. The term septicemia was coined by Pierre Piorry in 1837, and present-day sepsis is recognized as the consequence of dysregulated host response to infection associated with organ failure. [7] In the past, sepsis was mainly reported within two populations: (1) hospitalized pregnant women who frequently died after delivery of so-called puerperal fever [a term coined by Edward Strother (1675-1737) in 1718] and (2) wounded soldiers admitted to field hospitals. These patients would acquire nosocomial fever, nosocomial typhus, or nosocomial gangrene (nosocomial is a Latin word meaning "from the hospital"), later also referred to as putrid fever, hospital gangrene, or hospital fever.

Appropriate hygiene as a countermeasure was soon advocated by Ignaz Semmelweis (1818-1865) in 1847 in Vienna and Florence Nightingale in her hospital ward in the barracks of Scutari (Turkey) in 1854. [8] In 1850 and 1858, respectively, two physicians were the first to consider puerperal fever and hospital fever as similar entities: James Simpson "We can consider the animalcules brought by the air or by humans as the source of the disease, in a form non-recognized by our senses, or by any other direct means of research, but nonetheless subject to certain laws of propagation and dissemination similar to those of other species and producing the virus that acts deleterious to the human body." [9] [10] [11] Through the centuries, sepsis has killed many famous people, including the daughter of a future pope (Lucrece Borgia), musicians (Lully, Rossini, Manet, and Mahler), scientists and physicians (Hertz and Semmelweis), kings and state leaders (Alexander I of Greece, Rainier III of Monaco, and Pope John Paul II), sportsmen (Socrates and Mohammad Ali), actors (Christopher Reeve), and explorers (Lord Carnarvon). Unfortunately, even in the twenty-first century, sepsis remains a serious health threat worldwide. In 2017, WHO recognized sepsis as a global health priority. [12] Puerperal fever has been regularly reported as an epidemic. The first officially recorded outbreak occurred at the Hôtel Dieu Hospital in Paris in 1646. In 1795, during an epidemic of puerperal fever in Aberdeen (Scotland), and later in 1842 in Birmingham, Alexander Gordon (1752-1799) and John Thomas Ingleby (1794-1845) independently recognized that the hands of physicians were the origin of contamination, an observation further validated in Boston in 1843 by Oliver W. Holmes (1809-1894). The COVID-19 pandemic shares a common feature with earlier sepsis epidemics/pandemics, in particular, in-hospital spread and acquisition, especially in the early phase. Among the early cases in Wuhan (China), 44% of 179 SARS-CoV-2 infections were hospital-acquired. [13] However, the contamination primarily threatened the attending medical personnel rather than patients. Nevertheless, in a major teaching hospital in London, 15% of COVID-19 in-patient cases between March 2 and April 12, 2020, were either definitely or probably hospital-acquired. [14] In contrast, between March 7 and May 30, 2020, at a large US academic medical center with rigorous infection control measures, nosocomial COVID-19 was very rare during the height of the pandemic in the region. [15] Even after the extreme contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 was established and protective equipment widely introduced (e.g., face masks), findings by Santé Publique France on 2328 clusters during September 14-20, 2020, revealed that 9.8% of COVID-19 infections were acquired in health institutions and 13.0% in nursing homes. [16] Severe COVID-19: A Viral Sepsis?

A direct inference between sepsis and severe COVID-19 has been made, although limited information is available about this new global disease. This emerging concept advocates that the most severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection could be considered as a form of viral sepsis. [17] [18] [19] However, this alleged similarity appears to be too hastily made, and, in many instances, unjustified. Based on present reports, one of the most striking incongruities is an association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with a cytokine storm. Comprehensive analysis of the reported absolute values of circulating cytokines in COVID-19 patients and their comparison with other critical care conditions revealed a discrepancy in the cytokine storm theory. [20] [21] [22] [23] Several comparative studies have focused on this issue. The groups of Pickkers and Deutschman compared circulating cytokines in COVID-19 vs. acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, sepsis patients with or without ARDS, trauma patients, and those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. [24, 25] Considering the bloodstream readouts, a "cytokine drizzle" rather than the storm was characteristic in the most severe COVID-19 cases. In contrast, a major cytokine storm appeared to occur within the lungs. A transcriptome of bronchoalveolar lavage cells suggested a robust innate immune response, chemokinedominant hypercytokinemia, and interferon-inducible gene (ISG) expression, exhibiting pathogenic potential with overrepresentation of genes involved in inflammation. [26, 27] The above results are suggestive of the so-called compartmentalization [28] of the cytokine expression profile, in turn, implying that excessive pro-inflammatory cytokine release, albeit at defined locations and not necessarily systemic, may be a hallmark of severe COVID-19.

Notably, major coagulopathy/endotheliopathy featuring disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombocytopenia have been frequently associated with the most severe cases of sepsis [29] and the lungs are the most common organ to fail first in sepsis patients. [30] Interestingly, acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS constitute common complications of sepsis. [31] In severe COVID-19 cases, lung disease is specifically characterized by diffuse alveolar damage with perivascular T-cell infiltration, severe pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, widespread thrombosis with microangiopathy, and peculiar intussusceptive angiogenesis. [32] Other similarities between bacterial sepsis and COVID-19 include the occurrence of severe lymphopenia [33] and apoptosis of splenic and lymph node cells. [34] While major reduction of Human Leukocyte Antigen -DR isotype (HLA-DR) expression in circulating monocytes is detected in COVID-19 patients similar to bacterial sepsis, [35] the reduced capacity of monocytes to produce inflammatory cytokines (after ex vivo stimulation) typically observed in sepsis patients [36] does not seem to occur in COVID-19 infection. [37, 38] However, ex vivo cytokine production by activated T-cells is strongly reduced in COVID-19

patients. [23] Another common feature is the ambiguous role of type I interferon. The yin-yang property of the type I interferon cytokines is a signaling hallmark in most bacterial infections [39] and their detrimental role is widely recognized. [40] A study by Wang et al [41] elegantly demonstrated that in COVID-19 cases, early administration of interferon-α2b is associated with a reduction in hospital mortality. Conversely, late interferon treatment increased mortality and delayed recovery, suggesting that the timing of therapeutic interferon application is crucial. [41] The difficulty in addressing the role of interferon in COVID-19 is a consequence of the capacity of the causative virus to prevent its induction and effects in the infected host.

In the context of characterizing disease-specific long-term effects, the occurrence of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) in both sepsis and COVID-19 survivors presents a significant confounding factor. While new data regarding COVID-19 patients are emerging, the existing evidence reveals numerous respiratory, muscular, neurologic, and intellectual disorders associated with fatigue and pulmonary fibrosis, [42] the majority of which have also been reported in recovering sepsis patients. Moreover, due to the COVID-19-induced lockdowns introduced in numerous countries, psychiatric disorders with wide-ranging effects have become an increasing concern in patients post-infection and, in many cases, non-infected individuals subjected to lockdown conditions.

Despite exhaustive efforts to develop effective treatments against bacterial sepsis based on evolving understanding of the pathophysiology of the syndromes, no new strategies (excluding antimicrobials) have emerged over the last 30 years. Although numerous positive preclinical assays have been published, it appears increasingly clear that the hunt for the "magic bullet" is futile. [43] Surprisingly, observations in the field of sepsis over 30 years have been practically reproduced within a single year for COVID-19; in particular, an emergence of numerous attempts at rapid treatments, which, in many instances have been poorly (and often only theoretically) justified and follow the same over-simplistic paradigms that ultimately failed to develop effective treatments against bacterial sepsis. A key explanation could be strong multitier synergy existing between multiple individual molecular and cellular factors that leave limited room for a drug/intervention that would induce benefits by targeting only a single selected element of the complex synergistic puzzle. Recently, researchers investigating COVID-19 have rediscovered some elements of that synergy (known for almost three decades), re-publishing virtually the same phenomena in prestigious journals (and without referencing the original seminal findings). For example, a key role of anaphylatoxin C5a as an amplifier of the septic inflammatory response [44] has been reported in COVID-19. [45] Similarly, a deleterious synergy between tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interferon (IFN)- originally reported to explain lethality in response to endotoxin, [46] was also shown in SARS-CoV-2 infection. [47] Clearly, for bacterial sepsis originating from virtually any pathogen, the idea of vaccination as a remedy could be perceived as utopian. However, attempts have been made to develop an anti-endotoxin vaccine targeting the common structure shared by Gram-negative bacteria. [48] A recombinant human antibody binding the common lipid A moiety of endotoxin failed to neutralize endotoxin. [49] In contrast, the development of vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis, one of the most common causes of meningococcal sepsis, resulted in a significant reduction of meningococcal serogroup C disease and its spread across Europe.

Since vaccines are now available for five out of six meningococcal disease-causing serogroups (A, B, C, W, and Y), vaccination programs will induce broad protection leading to effective control of future meningococcal outbreaks. [50] Similarly, after the introduction of the Haemophilus influenzae type B meningitis vaccine, a significant decrease in the incidence and mortality rates of the disease across all age groups was evident. [51] 

On May 14, 1796, Edward Jenner vaccinated an 8-year-old boy, James Phipps, against smallpox, unknowingly initiating the most successful quest in combating infectious diseases.

Taking the pus from a sore on the hand of Sarah Nelmes, a dairymaid, he applied it to the arm of the boy using two superficial incisions. Jenner submitted a manuscript describing the procedure and its justification to the Royal Society in London, which was returned without presentation. This was the fate of the first report on the attempt to prevent the occurrence of smallpox, which finally led to complete eradication of the disease, as announced by WHO on October 26, 1979 . Another vaccination success of equal proportions was that for cattle rinderpest, which was officially declared eradicated by the Food and Agriculture Organization [52] The marked reduction in the incidence of many prevalent diseases during this time, such as typhoid fever and diphtheria, further illustrated the success of vaccination.

Vaccines have been extensively investigated as a means to prevent several epidemics/pandemics. Jaume Ferran (1852-1929) , a Spanish physician, claimed to have developed a vaccine against cholera, but the investigation team sent to Spain headed by Dr.

Paul Brouardel (1837 Brouardel ( -1906 returned with a negative conclusion of its efficacy. The group stated "The more closely the problems concern human life, the more the scientific method must be perfect, the more the scientist must be armed. M. Ferran seems not to have understood the importance of these truths, and to have abandoned the field of scientific experiments and studies to enter too early into what he calls 'practice'." [53] Unfortunately, this conclusion appears pertinent to the current pandemic, as evident from the irresponsible behavior of some medical professionals and politicians in recommending the use of certain drugs without reliable evidence of their efficacy and safety. Astonishingly, the paper alleging University. [54] The evaluation identified 10 major flaws in the study. A retraction was subsequently requested by the publisher but declined by the senior author. In the same July IJAA issue, similar independent criticism was published. [55] Since this time, many wellpowered clinical trials (e.g., RECOVERY) and meta-analyses have objectively demonstrated the absence of any HCQ benefits [56, 57] and emerging findings further revealed that the combination of HCQ and azithromycin significantly increased mortality. Interestingly, quinine, another anti-malarial drug, was also proposed as a putative cure for the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic.

A key figure in the development of vaccines against nineteenth -to twentieth-century epidemics/pandemics was Waldemar Haffkine (1860-1930; Figure 2) , [58] 

The aim of vaccines is to induce adaptive immunity, which involves (1) a cellular arm:

(2) production of antibodies that neutralize the invading agent and facilitate its elimination.

Accordingly, natural antibodies found in post-infectious convalescent patients could be used to protect newly infected patients. A study performed on 39 patients with severe and potentially lethal COVID-19 reported a significant protective effect (25% vs. 60% mortality in the placebo group). [61] Similarly, in a study of 160 patients who underwent randomization, early administration of high-titer convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV-2 to infected older adults within 72 h after the onset of mild COVID-19 symptoms reduced disease progression. [62] However, an investigation on 464 adults with moderate COVID-19 showed no benefits of convalescent plasma. [63] Another study including hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19-induced pneumonia assigned to receive convalescent plasma (n = 208) or placebo (n = 105) also revealed no differences in clinical status or overall mortality between the groups. [64] Convalescent plasma should be standardized based not on titer but its virus neutralization capacity; in other words, qualitative standardization should be advocated and not quantitative standardization. While the latter observations raise doubts against the efficiency of convalescent plasma, patients in the most severe infection groups were shown to have anti-type I interferon antibodies. [65] The presence of such detrimental antibodies in transferred plasma should be avoided. Following treatment with a recombinant human antibody (Bamlanivimab®; LY-CoV555), a lower number of patients required hospitalization, specifically, 5/309 (1.6%), compared with placebo (9/143; 6.3%). [66] However, the monoclonal antibody coadministered with remdesivir did not demonstrate efficacy in 162 hospitalized patients who had COVID-19 without end-organ failure compared with placebo (n = 151). [67] The issue of whether the increasing frequency of neutralizationresistant variants could have undermined the efficacy of Bamlanivimab® in this trial remains to be established. Interestingly, two agammaglobulinemia patients who developed COVID-19-associated interstitial pneumonia did not require oxygen ventilation or intensive care.

Another study suggested that humoral immunity may not be a prerequisite to combat COVID-

anti-CD20 antibody treatment. [68] These results suggest that T-cell-dependent immunity may suffice in the absence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

The use of poly-specific antibodies present in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations has also been proposed to treat bacterial sepsis. A recent meta-analysis suggested that IVIG treatment reduces the all-cause mortality of patients with sepsis, but the study showed significant heterogeneity. [69] Enriched preparations with IgM have also been investigated but the available evidence is too ambiguous to support the widespread use of intravenous IgM for the treatment of sepsis. [70] Furthermore, IVIG with enhanced polyspecificity may have clinical potential in sepsis and related systemic inflammatory syndromes. [71] Several other questions regarding antibodies need to be addressed. (1) How long does humoral immunity last? Owing to the limited observation period for SARS-CoV-2 infections, this question cannot as yet be precisely answered. (2) Are antibodies fully protective or could they exert adverse effects? The phenomenon, known as "antibody-dependent enhancement," could contribute to further dissemination of the virus by favoring its entry into cells devoid of ACE2 but harboring Fcγ receptors (e.g., macrophages). [72] Notably, this type of antibodydependent infection mediated by antibodies against spike proteins has been reported for SARS-CoV-1. [73] This finding is particularly prevalent in dengue virus infection and has confounded vaccine development research in this area. Another potentially detrimental effect is the capacity of antibodies to activate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The nonneutralizing antibodies form immune complexes with viral antigens, resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cell recruitment, and activation of the complement within tissues. [74] Additionally, patients with severe COVID-19 produce a unique serologic signature, including an increase in IgG1 with afucosylated Fc glycans (on asparagine #297).

Afucosylated IgG responses, in turn, enhance the production of inflammatory cytokines by monocytes, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and TNF. [75] 

Robust T-cell immunity has been reported in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19. [76] Interestingly, this T-cell reactivity has also been detected in some healthy blood donors, suggesting the existence of some cross-reactivity with previous ordinary circulating coronavirus. In an earlier study, circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + and CD4 + T-cells were identified in approximately 70% and 100% COVID-19 convalescent patients, respectively, and CD4 + T-cell responses to spike, the main vaccine-related target, were robust and correlated with the magnitude of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. [77] Interestingly, the frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells was similar between asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals but the former showed increased IFN-γ and IL-2 production. Thus, asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals were not characterized by weak antiviral immunity, and in fact, mounted a highly functional virus-specific T-cell immune response. [78] T-cell responses recognize at least 30-40 epitopes in each donor and immunodominant regions for CD4 + T-cells have minimal overlap with antibody epitopes. [79] Owing to the broad T-cell repertoire, viral escape of T-cell immunity should be unlikely, which is an important assumption, particularly in view of the rapid emergence of multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Unfortunately, a recent investigation on the South African B.1.351 variant failed to show protection by the recombinant adenovirus AstraZeneca vaccine against mild to moderate COVID-19. However, vaccine efficacy against severe COVID-19 was not determined. [80] While the contribution and induction of specific Th1 cells and cytotoxic T-cells in response to the vaccines are highly expected, induction of Th2 cells that could favor a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration should be avoided. [81] Challenges As of April 2021, 311 vaccine candidates had been developed against SARS-CoV-2 (84 tested in clinical trials and 227 under preclinical investigation). [82] Multiple approaches for vaccine mass production rely on existing developmental blueprints using inactivated full virus, attenuated virus, virus-like particles, and protein subunits. New methodologies with non-commercialized vaccines employing DNA, viral vectors, and messenger RNA (mRNA) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles have led to outstanding results in humans and animal models, suggesting that the different vaccine types can facilitate the effective generation of protective antibodies and T-cell-dependent immunity. [83, 84] mRNA vaccines have been investigated for >30 years. [85] In vivo induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by liposome-entrapped mRNA was achieved in 1993. [86] Katalin Kariko, a Hungarian-born researcher working at the University of Pennsylvania, is considered by some as Nobel Prizeworthy for rendering this approach feasible. Dr. Kariko proposed the use of 1methylpseudouridine to avoid activation of Toll-like receptors (TLR)7 and TLR8 by uridine. [87, 88] Furthermore, uridine-containing mRNA induced interferon, which is counterproductive during vaccination, preventing the selection of high-affinity antibodies. Dr.

Kariko also purified the mRNA to remove dsRNA that activates TLR3, retaining the lipid nanoparticles with an adjuvant effect. Incorporation of non-inflammatory, modified nucleosides in mRNA is required for the production of large amounts of antigen and robust immune responses following the activation of T follicular helper cells, germinal center Bcells, [89] and appropriate activation of dendritic cells. [86] mRNA coding for spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been designed for COVID-19 vaccines and preclinical and phase III studies have confirmed the significant efficiency of this approach within a very short period. [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] Other efficient vaccines (developed in <1 year) have been highlighted, such as the use of recombinant adenovirus coding for spike protein, [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] whole virion vaccine, [103] purified spike protein, [104] and recombinant measles virus expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. [105] Currently, vaccines are administered through the classical intramuscular route, but an intranasal route would be of significant interest given the ease of application and significant role of IgA and mucosal immunity. Indeed, IgAs are predominantly involved in the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. [106] Intranasal vaccination with a lentiviral vector has been shown to confer strong protection against SARS-CoV-2 in mouse and golden hamsters. [107] The bacilli Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, set up by the two Pasteurian researchers working in Lille in 1921-1924 to prevent tuberculosis, has been recommended to boost the immune status of the population during the COVID-19 pandemic based on epidemiological analyses of COVID-19 propensity. Upon examination of different countries with varying vaccination policies, it was initially proposed that BCG exposure could contribute to attenuation of the spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. [108] Further investigations suggested that BCG vaccination is associated with a decrease in the incidence of sickness induced by COVID-19. [109] However, other groups reported no protective effect in middleaged individuals administered the BCG vaccine at birth against SARS-CoV-2 [110] and the most recent epidemiological findings questioned the claim of BCG-induced protection, demonstrating a possible arbitrary selection bias in the analyses. [111, 112] At least 11 trials including over 16,000 patients have been registered to examine the efficacy of BCGdependent protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. While non-specific boosting of the immune system to combat viral infection (associated with the concept of trained innate immunity) remains an interesting theory, this approach needs reliable validation.

As in the case of anti-COVID-19 therapeutics, the development, registration, and commercialization/distribution processes of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are not free from political pressures, international turf wars, and various conspiracy theories. While these issues may never be fully eliminated, the best available remedy to overcome and dispel such impediments lies in maximal reliance on high-quality evidence-based science and transparency of all proceedings.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic emerged in late 2019. No effective drugs are immediately available, resulting in various non-pharmaceutical protective intervention attempts. Face masks are currently advocated worldwide as a protective approach while waiting for herd immunity to emerge. Charles Delorme (1584-1678), a graduate from the University of Montpellier, moved to Paris to practice medicine and became the chief physician to three consecutive French kings (Henri IV, Louis XIII, and Louis XIV). In 1619, following the eruption of the bubonic plague in Paris, Delorme designed a "plague preventive costume" featuring a famous beak-like-shaped nose filled with perfume and herbs and eyes protected by spectacles. This protection was worn by doctors in France and Italy until the Great Plague of Marseille in 1720. In 1870, John Tyndall (1820-1893), [113] an Irish physician and great supporter of the germ theory of Louis Pasteur, proposed breathing through cotton wool to filter the air and protect against infections. Subsequently, the use of surgical masks was recommended in 1897 by Paul Berger (1845-1908) In contrast to the other fields, research on vaccines is essentially performed by pharmaceutical companies, either alone (66%) or in collaboration with academic centers (21%). [115] A number of the proposed approaches are classical vaccine strategies that are already employed for many anti-viral vaccines. Others are new approaches with no commercialized examples among human vaccines, although some already exist in veterinary medicine. The lack of data may have an impact on the attitude of the general population.

Reluctance toward the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines appears to be on the rise [116] but strongly varies across countries. For example, the Chinese population has a very high level of confidence while in France, the country of Louis Pasteur, acceptance of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is relatively low. Given the considerable existing political influence of various governments and/or public officials, often reverting to nationalistic overtones for self-serving goals, it is appropriate to recall the famous statement by Louis Pasteur: "Science has no homeland, because knowledge belongs to humanity, the torch that lights the world." The current and future epidemics will be more effectively and rapidly overcome with smaller human and economic losses if the above counsel is followed worldwide.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. 

The recent pandemic of influenza: Its place of origin and mode of spread

Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the prepandemic period in Italy

Evidence of early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in France: Findings from the population-based "CONSTANCES" cohort

Global patterns in coronavirus diversity

SARS (10 Years After

Worldwide reduction in MERS cases and deaths since 2016

The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)

From septicemia to sepsis 3.0 -From Ignaz Semmelweis to Louis Pasteur

Le 19 e livre traitant de la grosse vérole

Oeuvres posthumes. Paris: Imprimerie Ph.D. Pierres; 1783

Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority -A WHO Resolution

Nosocomial infections among patients with COVID-19, SARS and MERS: A rapid review and meta-analysis

Nosocomial transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: A retrospective study of 66 hospital-acquired cases in a London teaching hospital

Incidence of nosocomial COVID-19 in patients hospitalized at a large US academic medical center

COVID-19 Point épidémiologique hebdomadaire du 24 Septembre 2020

SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: Observations and hypotheses

The severe COVID-19: A sepsis induced by viral infection? And its immunomodulatory therapy

COVID-19 sepsis and microcirculation dysfunction

SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: Evolving reality, global response, knowledge gaps, and opportunities

The COVID-19 puzzle: Deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity

Is a "Cytokine Storm" relevant to COVID-19

Severe immunosuppression and not a cytokine storm characterizes COVID-19 infections

Cytokine levels in critically Ill patients with COVID-19 and other conditions

Cytokine elevation in severe and critical COVID-19: A rapid systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison with other inflammatory syndromes

Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients

Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients

Compartmentalization of the inflammatory response in sepsis and SIRS

Sepsis-induced coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation

The role of the coagulation cascade in the continuum of sepsis and acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Lung injury induced by sepsis: Lessons learned from large animal models and future directions for treatment

Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in COVID-19

Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: A descriptive and predictive study

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) directly decimates human spleens and lymph nodes

The antiinflammatory response dominates after septic shock: Association of low monocyte HLA-DR expression and high interleukin-10 concentration

Dysregulation of in vitro cytokine production by monocytes during sepsis

Monocyte HLA-DR measurement by flow cytometry in COVID-19 patients: An interim review

Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure

The yin and yang of type I interferon activity in bacterial infection

Interfering with immunity: Detrimental role of type I IFNs during infection

Retrospective multicenter cohort study shows early interferon therapy is associated with favorable clinical responses in COVID-19 patients

Assessment and characterisation of post-COVID-19 manifestations

Sepsis therapies: Learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads

Protective effects of C5a blockade in sepsis

Association of COVID-19 inflammation with activation of the C5a-C5aR1 axis

Evidence for IFN-gamma as a mediator of the lethality of endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ triggers inflammatory cell death, tissue damage, and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection and cytokine shock syndromes

Development of an anti-core lipopolysaccharide vaccine for the prevention and treatment of sepsis

Assessment of ability of murine and human anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies to bind and neutralize lipopolysaccharide

Worldwide Haemophilus influenzae type B disease at the beginning of the 21st century: Global analysis of the disease burden 25 years after the use of the polysaccharide vaccine and a decade after the advent of conjugates

Tome 6) réunies par Pasteur Vallery-Radot

Rapport sur les essais de vaccination cholérique entrepris en Espagne par M. le docteur Ferran

Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial Gautret et al

Reply to Gautret et al: Hydroxychloroquine sulfate and azithromycin for COVID-19: What is the evidence and what are the risks

Effect of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin on the mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: A systematic review and metaanalysis

Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for treatment of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials

Inoculation de vaccins anticholériques à l'homme

Remarks on Haffkine's method of protective inoculation against cholera

Remarks on the plague prophylactic fluid

Convalescent plasma treatment of severe COVID-19: A propensity score-matched control study

Early high-titer plasma therapy to prevent severe COVID-19 in older adults

Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate COVID-19 in adults in India: Open label phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial)

A randomized trial of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 severe pneumonia

Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody LY-CoV555 in outpatients with COVID-19

A neutralizing monoclonal antibody for hospitalized patients with COVID-19

Anti-CD20 and COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis and related disorders: A case series of 60 patients from Madrid, Spain

Evaluation of the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin dosing on mortality in patients with sepsis: A network meta-analysis

The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: A metaanalysis with trial sequential analysis

Intravenous immunoglobulin with enhanced polyspecificity improves survival in experimental sepsis and aseptic systemic inflammatory response syndromes

The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19

Antibodydependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins

Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies

Proinflammatory IgG Fc structures in patients with severe COVID-19

Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19

Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals

Highly functional virus-specific cellular immune response in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases

Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant

Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus

Next-generation vaccine platforms for COVID-19

COVID-19: Progress in diagnostics, therapy and vaccination

mRNA-based therapeutics -Developing a new class of drugs

Induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo by liposome-entrapped mRNA

Suppression of RNA recognition by Tolllike receptors: The impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA

Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability

Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses

Extracellular mRNA induces dendritic cell activation by stimulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion and signaling through a nucleotide receptor

A single immunization with nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines elicits strong cellular and humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in mice

COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and T(H)1 T cell responses

Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness

Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques

Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK

Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques

Interim results of a phase 1-2a trial of Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine

Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: An interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia

Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial

A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity

A highly immunogenic and effective measles virus-based Th1-biased COVID-19 vaccine

IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2

Intranasal vaccination with a lentiviral vector protects against SARS-CoV-2 in preclinical animal models

Significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes in countries with higher BCG vaccination coverage: A multivariable analysis

Safety and COVID-19 symptoms in individuals recently vaccinated with BCG: A retrospective cohort study

BCG vaccination in infancy does not protect against COVID-19. Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

Protection against SARS-CoV-2 by BCG vaccination is not supported by epidemiological analyses

BCG epidemiology supports its protection against COVID-19? A word of caution

On haze and dust

The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2

Whither COVID-19 vaccines

Figure 2: Waldemar Haffkine (1860-1930). Physician and scientist born in Odessa who studied zoology at the University of Odessa under the supervision of Elie Metchnikoff

Haffkine joined the laboratory of Metchnikoff in 1890 and developed the first effective cholera vaccine. In 1893-1894, he was offered the possibility to organize a cholera vaccination campaign in various regions of India where epidemics of cholera were prevalent by Lord Dufferin (Viceroy of India from 1884 to 1888 and Ambassador

Back in India in 1897, Haffkine produced a plague vaccine composed of killed germs to combat the bubonic plague epidemic