key: cord-0781276-hbh874p1
authors: Pelly, Fiona E.; Wiesmayr‐Freeman, Tania; Tweedie, Judith
title: Student placement adaptability during COVID‐19: Lessons learnt in 2020
date: 2020-06-23
journal: Nutr Diet
DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12625
sha: 78d1afafd42035389a4f443e32b89b3a3348ea23
doc_id: 781276
cord_uid: hbh874p1

nan

To the Editor The advent of COVID-19 has placed undue pressure on universities with accredited dietetic programs having to consider alternative models of placement due to social distancing, risk mitigation and isolation measures identified by placement partners. University programs have the added concern of maintaining professional accreditation standards 1 by ensuring that students are able to demonstrate that they meet competence. 2 We wish to outline the changes that have led to new opportunities to develop student competence at the University of the Sunshine Coast (USC) between February to April 2020 as a result of this unprecedented situation.

The novel coronavirus COVID-19 was first identified in Queensland on 29 January 2020. 3 With the unfolding situation, travel across the state became more tenuous and sending students away from support networks and possibly into isolation was less than ideal. Also, students' anxiety about the risk associated with COVID-19 and site constraints with implementing social distancing highlighted issues with the existing placement model. Thus, consideration was needed to modify public health nutrition, foodservice and medical nutrition therapy placements.

At USC, a nutrition and dietetics clinic was already in operation fortnightly as an additional experience as part of the medical nutrition therapy placement program. In response to the cancellation of some placements due to COVID-19 and increasing anxiety of some students, a decision was made to expand the operation of the clinic using telehealth. Strategies to market the service were a necessity and included a media release and social media posts that resulted in an ABC radio interview across Queensland. What resulted was a demand for the clinic services that required a quick response, and adaptability of staff and students. The attendance in the 2 weeks that the clinic was operational prior to this time (23rd-27th March and 6th-9th April 2020) was declining due to cancellations, and only one new (14%) and six review (86%) clients had attended. This increased by 300% over 9 days of operation (14th-24th April 2020) to 19 new (90%) and two review consultations (10%), and another 16 clients still to be seen. For a snapshot of consultations, see Table 1 .

For the public health nutrition and foodservice placements, remote projects were collaboratively established with sites with joint supervision that involved weekly Zoom meetings with sites, students and university supervisors.

The initial challenge for staff was to introduce flexibility across areas of practice to ensure that students continued to develop skills that allowed them to be assessed against the competency standards 2 while still complying with university policies on assessment and satisfying the requests of placement partners. Several challenges have arisen with the use of online supervision and telehealth ( Table 2) .

We believe there are reasons for the successful implementation of online placements at USC. This includes acting quickly and adapting to a new situation, raising awareness of the telehealth service and creating demand specific to COVID-19, removing barriers of cost and travel for clients, focusing on the "can do" and triaging clients if required. Transitioning to telehealth provided students with the opportunity to develop e-health skills that are also essential employability traits for healthcare. 4 The limited access to dietetic services for those in rural and remote areas 5 and the lower recurring costs of telehealth for dietetic service providers and clients, 6 provides an opportunity for USC to engage more easily with the local community and broaden reach beyond the Sunshine Coast. In regard to remote project supervision, establishing clear parameters for students, upskilling on various modes of technology and ensuring adequate engagement with stakeholders has been integral to success.

The knowledge and skills developed through this change are relevant to future work opportunities for graduates and are representative of the future thinking for dietetic education and training which include use of technology, digital literacy and communication skills .7-9 Concurrent workforce data collected via a survey of USC nutrition and dietetic graduates (2009-2018) demonstrates that of 91 individuals, only 38 (42%) of the sample were currently working in clinical dietetics within a hospital, with 43 (45%) self-employed or working for a small business. Students were asked which skills were of most value in their dietetics degree and what they would have liked to have obtained but felt they did not get during their course of study. Clinical, research and communication skills (aligning with key learning concepts for dietetics 10 ) were valued, while business and private practice were highlighted as areas that could be better incorporated into the degree, which supports recent results from focus group discussions with dietetic graduates. 11 This data suggests a need for change to exposure to different placement settings. As this was collected prior to the current situation with COVID-19, it will be beneficial to track graduate outcomes and reflection of placement experience from the 2020 cohort. The impact of these changes on students' competence and future employability will not be known for some time, however, we are confident that the use of telehealth and online placements through this unprecedented situation has resulted in beneficial outcomes that will remain in place beyond COVID-19. We have observed that students have risen to the challenge and have demonstrated flexibility, adaptability and resilience that they may not have experienced through standard placement models.

As of the current date (11 May 2020), the number of new cases of COVID-19 has declined in Queensland and thus sites are looking at how they can re-accommodate students. The big question is whether universities should return to standard placement models or consider this as a time to change.

The content in this manuscript was written by the first author with contributions from the other authors. All

Accreditation Standards for Dietetic Education Programs. Version 2

Dietitians Association of Australia. National Competency Standards for Dietitians in Australia

Queensland coronavirus update. Queensland Government

Employability skills essential for healthcare industry

The dietetic workforce distribution geographic atlas provides insight into the inequitable access for dietetic services for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia

Cost evaluation of providing evidence-based dietetic services for weight management in adults: in-person versus eHealth delivery

The contested space: the impact of competency-based education and accreditation on dietetic practice in Australia

Future dietitian 2025: informing the development of a workforce strategy for dietetics

Visioning report 2017: a preferred path forward for the nutrition and dietetics profession

Using document analysis to identify core concepts for dietetics: the first step in promoting conceptual learning

Preparedness for advancing future health: a national qualitative exploration of dietetics graduates' experiences