key: cord-0777753-i442yh72 authors: Ben-Ezra, Menachem; Sun, Shaojing; Hou, Wai Kai; Goodwin, Robin title: The association of being in quarantine and related COVID-19 recommended and non-recommended behaviors with psychological distress in Chinese population date: 2020-07-02 journal: J Affect Disord DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.026 sha: 2348580c5ff2f55e84f8e99787f3a0c92b570289 doc_id: 777753 cord_uid: i442yh72 • The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines needs to be empirically examined. • The study sought to look at the recommended and non-recommended behaviors. • The results of the study show that psychological distress was negatively associated with recommended behaviors and positively with non-recommended behaviors. Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, emerged in Wuhan China but rapidly spread to other regions in China. This led to the quarantine of Wuhan city, and the recommendation of a number of precautious behaviors by both the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Chinese Centre for Disease control (CDC). Mortality salience increases distress 1 , and previous studies reported increased psychological distress during the previous SARS-CoV coronavirus 2, 3 . Anxiety can motivate people to adopt preventive measures during a pandemic 4 . Drawing on health belief models 5 , research conducted during H1N1 ("swine flu") and SARS-CoV positively associated distress with internationally recommended health behaviours 4 . However, anxiety may also encourage non-recommended, avoidant behaviours 6 . To date no empirical study to date has examined associations between psychological distress, quarantine and the use of recommend and non-recommended behaviors. Understanding this may be crucial for comprehending the psychological drivers of important behaviors at a time of national crisis, as well as the avoidance of behaviors with negligible or negative impact on health outcomes. We used an internet panel in China to recruit a national sample (n = 1134) between 4-10 March, 2020 using a random and stratified sampling with oversampling of Hubei region and the city of Wuhan. We employed a survey company specializing in East Asia (Asia Opinions), which uses a panel of participants across East Asia, including China. Participants are sent invitations to participate in the study and given small incentives for participation. The mean age of these participants was 31.01 years (SD = 6.81, range = 18-59), 53.5% were female (n = 607), 7.6% (n = 86) of the participants were living in Hubei region excluding Wuhan, 128 (11.3%) were living in the city of Wuhan and 920 (81.1%) were living in the rest of China. Each participant signed an electronic informed consent form. The response rate for the survey was 42.7%. Being in quarantine was measured by the question: "Are you currently in quarantine because of the Coronavirus?". For our study we took recommended behaviours to include those showing appropriate actions to mitigate infection risk, as suggested by international health bodies. These included three items selected from WHO guidelines 7 . "1. I am making sure that I ventilate the house regularly to help contain the risk of the virus". "2. When I get a chance to go out, I keep a distance of at least a meter from others when I go outside". "3. I try to avoid people who show cold or flu-like symptoms". Non-recommended behaviors were health behaviours that provide little protection against infection, or economic action that contradict national guidelines for returning to normal activities once the pandemic risk is reduced. We measured non-recommended health behaviours using two items from the WHO MythBusters list 8 . "1. I am taking some vitamins to help protect me safe from covid-19. "2. I have taken traditional medicines to keep me safe from covid-19". Nonrecommended economic behavior was measured by the item: "3. When my work reopens, I will take a few extra days off just to be on the safe side". Translations of all items in the questionnaire were validated using a bilingual group of translators. Psychological distress was measured by Kessler"s K6 (Chinese version, Appendix A) 9 . Scores ranged from 0 to 24, with 13 or higher indicating elevated psychological distress. Cronbach α was satisfactory (0.90). The K6 Chinese version was culturally adapted and validated as reported elsewhere 10 . Data was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression 11 to measure the association between elevated psychological distress (K6 ≥ 13) as the outcome measure with the following variables entering the equation: 1. Demographics (age, sex, region). 2. Currently being in quarantine. 3. Recommended behaviors. 4. Non-recommended behaviors. For each variable we calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% C.I. using SPSS version 25 (IBM). Risk of severe mental illness was evident in 19.1% of the sample (n= 217). Elevated psychological distress was found among those who live in Hubei region excluding Wuhan (OR = 2.50 (95% CI: 1.44-4.32); p = <.001), those living in Wuhan excluding Hubei region (OR = 3.56 (95% CI: 2.25-5.61); p = .001), respondents currently in quarantine (OR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.17-2.84); p = .008), those practicing non-recommended behaviors such as taking vitamins as protection against COVID-19 (OR = 2.01 (95% CI: 1.42-3.11); p = .001) and participants planning to return to work a few days after it officially opens (OR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.46-3.35); p = <.001). Practicing recommended behaviors were associated with lower psychological distress: (Regularly ventilating the house in order to contain the risk of COVID-19 (OR = .38 (95% CI: .20-.72); p = .003), Keeping distance of at least one meter when going out (OR = .46 (95% CI: .23-.93); p = .03) and avoiding avoid people who show cold or flu-like symptoms (OR = .14 (95% CI: .07-.28); p = <.001)). See Table 1 for more information. Psychological distress was highest amongst those at the original epicenter of the outbreak (Hubei region, Wuhan city), as well as those in quarantine. Respondents in quarantine were faced with a range of challenges, both physical (e.g. financial loss) and psychological (stigma, absence of psychological support services) 12, 13 . Over 90% of the participants reported adhering to the WHO guidelines regarding recommended behaviors. Lower psychological distress was evident amongst those following these guidelines, suggesting that effective preventive action, coupled with high levels of trust in the information received 13 may play an important role in distress reduction. While this may suggest potential social desirability bias 14 , high levels of recommended behavioural compliance were also reported in other Chinese work during this pandemic 13 , as well as previous pandemic outbreaks in China 15 . Consistent with earlier work on H1N1 6 , higher distress was also associated with non-recommended behaviors (taking vitamins, reluctance to return to work), While adhered to by a lower percentage of respondents (from 28%-64%), such behavior may result from a belief in misleading "scientific" information, often presented online (the primary route of information about the pandemic in China) 13 . Social media use has been associated with mental health risk during COVID-19 16 . The use of traditional medicine was also consistent with a Chinese culture of traditional medicine, also evident during H1N1 and often favored when there is no clear treatment for an emerging risk. We recognize several limitations. Our study was cross-sectional and responses were selfreported. As is common with research on-line 13 our sample was predominately a young one. While we recognize that many respondents may have had personal experiences of epidemic threat during the H7N9 avian influenza outbreak 15 we had no information on past medical or psychological conditions nor we did have information regarding number of days in quarantine, type of information received about the effectiveness of preventive measures, the level of awareness, or health literacy at the individual or community level. We did not include other significant predictors of risk perception significant during H1N1 (e.g. personal values) 17 , or other proximal factors significant in a variety of health belief models (e.g. attitude towards the behaviour, perceived behavioural control and social pressure to perform from others 18 . Broader cultural influences on community health responsibilities and the minimization of risk may also be particularly important in a collective society such as China 19 . Finally, we did not consider additional psychological consequences of anxiety such as the stereotyping and prejudice reported during SARS 20 . However, this to our knowledge is the first study to empirically examine the association between psychological distress, quarantine and recommend and non-recommended behavior during COVID- 19 . Findings suggest that authorities should address the mental toll of quarantine over time, and reduce anxiety in order to limit unnecessary or costly actions. The causes and consequences of a need for selfesteem: A terror management theory. Public self and private self Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine Longitudinal assessment of community psychobehavioral responses during and after the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey COVID-19) advice for the public. World Health Organization website COVID-19) advice for the public -MythBusters. World Health Organization website Screening for serious mental illness in the general population Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative Logistic regression diagnostics: understanding how well a model predicts outcomes The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review Public perceptions and reactions to H7N9 in Mainland China Multidisciplinary research priorities for the covid-19 pandemic Initial Psychological responses to Swine Flu Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review Culture's consequences comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations Representations of SARS in the British Newspapers Screening for serious mental illness in the general population Acknowledgment: M.B wish to thank the research authority at Ariel university for their continuous support in funding my research.All the authors have contributed to the paper in terms of conceptualization, data collection, analyses of the paper, writing, and important intellectual contribution.Funding for the study was awarded to Prof. Menachem Ben-Ezra from the Research authority in Ariel University. The funding agency (Ariel University) had no influence on the study.We declare no conflict of interest or otherwise.The paper is a purely academic research. Appendix A -Kessler"s K6 (English version) Please circle the number that best describes how often you had this feeling during the last month? During the past 30 days, about how often did you feel ...None of the Time