key: cord-0771210-cw5xzte0
authors: Chang, Chia-Yu; Wang, Yong-Sheng; Wu, Jou-Fei; Yang, Tzu-Jing; Chang, Yen-Chen; Chae, Chanhee; Chang, Hui-Wen; Hsu, Shang-Te Danny
title: Generation and Characterization of a Spike Glycoprotein Domain A-Specific Neutralizing Single-Chain Variable Fragment against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
date: 2021-07-29
journal: Vaccines (Basel)
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080833
sha: 2aaeac62135182e8b061186b231c4281880ae764
doc_id: 771210
cord_uid: cw5xzte0

The emergence of the genotype (G) 2 and re-emergence of the G1 porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has caused severe economic impacts in the past decade. Developments of efficient vaccines against new variants of PEDV have been challenging, not least because of the difficulties in eliciting mucosal and lactogenic immunity. A single-chain fragment variable (scFv) capable of efficient antigen recognition is an alternative to vaccination and treatment of a viral infection. In the present study, the variable regions of the light chain and the heavy chain of a G2b PEDV spike domain A (S1(A))-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) were sequenced, constructed with a (G4S) x3 linker, and produced by a mammalian protein expression system. Our results demonstrated that the PEDV S1(A) domain scFv was able to bind to S proteins of both G1 and G2b PEDVs. Nevertheless, the scFv was only capable of neutralizing the homologous G2b PEDV but not the G1 PEDV. The binding ability of the G2b-specific neutralizing scFv was not able to predict the neutralizing ability toward heterologous PEDV. The anti-PEDV S1(A) scFv presented herein serves as a potential therapeutic candidate against the virulent G2b PEDV.

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a contagious swine enteric virus that causes porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) in neonatal and suckling piglets, which impacts the swine industry all over the world [1, 2] . The historic genotype (G)1 PEDV was first identified in the late 1970s in Belgium and subsequently became an endemic disease over the past decades in Europe and Asia [3] [4] [5] with sporadic outbreaks [4] . A new variant of PEDV, which belongs to G2 based on the phylogenetic analysis, has emerged since 2010 in China and rapidly spread across North America and Asia [6] [7] [8] [9] . This new PEDV variant caused high morbidity and high mortality in neonatal piglets [4, 10, 11] . Effective vaccination is a highly sought-after solution to mitigate a PEDV-associated endemic. An ideal PED vaccine should be capable of inducing passive lactogenic immunity from sows to protect neonatal piglets [12, 13] . A number of vaccines against G2 PEDV are conditionally licensed in the US and Korea to mitigate the outbreaks, albeit with controversies about the efficacy of the vaccines [14, 15] . Importantly, there is hitherto no effective prophylactic method and therapeutic tool to be used in the field to control seasonal outbreaks of PED in neonatal piglets.

PEDV is a single positive-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the genera Alphacoronavirus in the family Coronaviridae [1] . The genome size of PEDV is approximately 28 kilo-base (kb) to encode for 4 structural proteins, namely spike (S, 180-220 kDa), nucleocapsid (N, 55-58 kDa), membrane (M, 27-32 kDa), and envelope (E, 7 kDa), and 17 non-structural proteins (nsp1-nsp16, and ORF3) [1] . The S protein modulates host recognition, receptor binding, membrane fusion, and harbors neutralizing epitopes. It is, therefore, a major target for the development of vaccines and therapeutics. The S protein of PEDV (PEDV-PT strain, GenBank: KY929405.1) is 1383 amino acids (a.a.) in length, encompassing six functional domains, namely S1 0 (residues 1-219), S1 A (residues 219-509), S1 B (residues 509-639), S1 CD (residues 639-729), S2 (residues 730-1334), and the terminal transmembrane domain [16] [17] [18] . Several neutralizing epitopes of historic PEDV (G1) have been identified, including collagenase-26K equivalent (COE, residues 501-640) [19] , S1D (residues 640-794) [20] , and 2C10 (residues 1373-1379) [20] . Meanwhile, the S1 0 , S1 A , S1 B , and the N-terminus of S2 were proposed to have neutralizing epitopes of the new variants of PEDV (G2) [17, 18, 21] .

Understanding the structural and functional characteristics of epitopes is essential for immunological therapeutics developments. In human medicine, therapeutic antibodies have been developed since the 1980s. They have become an integral part of modern medicine in treating many diseases, including infectious, oncogenic, metabolic, autoimmune diseases, and even aging-associated disorders [22] [23] [24] . Several therapeutic antibodies have been deployed successfully and have been commercialized to treat viral and bacterial infections in humans [23] . Along with the increasing need in the market, developments of therapeutic antibodies are being made to tackle severe infectious human diseases such as dengue fever [25] , influenza [26] , Ebola [27] , and COVID-19 [28] . Efforts to develop therapeutic antibodies against animal diseases are also actively being made in veterinary medicine [29, 30] . However, success has been limited in controlling swine diseases, which is one of the most valuable agricultural industries worldwide.

We have previously reported a novel neutralizing monoclonal antibody (NmAb), E10E-1-10, that targets a conformational epitope within the S1 A domain of S protein of PEDV [18] . In the present study, we determined the DNA sequence encoding for the variable regions of E10E-1-10 by using template-switch specialized reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) [31, 32] . An scFv corresponding to E10E-1-10 was constructed and expressed in a mammalian protein expression system, the HEK293 Expi cell that can be cultured in suspension in large volumes, followed by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) to yield highly purified recombinant scFv in milligram quantities. The biological function of recombinant scFv was evaluated by immunostaining, neutralization of viral infection, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and immunoprecipitation assays. The results provided good evidence to support the potential use of the scFv for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes against PEDV.

The messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) encoding for the variable regions of E10E-1-10 was sequenced by using the template-switch specialized reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) [32] . Briefly, total mRNA was extracted from the freshly harvested hybridoma cells by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. To synthesize sequence-labeled cDNA, SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), custom-sequence template-switch oligonucleotide (TSO), and sequence-specific primers for the kappa chain (mIgK RT), lambda chain (mIgL RT), and heavy chain (mIgHG RT) of murine IgG were used (Table 1) . For each reaction, 100 ng mRNA, 1 µL of 10 mM primer (mIgK RT, mIgL RT, or mIgHG RT), and 1 µL of 10 mM dNTP were mixed and incubated at 72 • C for 3 min. Subsequently, 2 µL of 5x SMARTScribe buffer (Clontech), 1 µL of 20 mM DTT (Clontech), 3 µL of 10 µM TSO, 0.25 µL of RNAase inhibitor (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and 0.5 µL of 100 U/µL SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Clontech) were added to the mixture and the reaction was filled to 20 µL with RNAse-free water. The mixture was incubated at 42 • C for 60 min following a 5-min incubation at 70 • C. The cDNA was stored at −20 • C until use. 

To obtain the sequences of the variable region of the mAb, the universal custom forward primer, ISPCR, together with chain-specific reverse primers (mIgKpcr, mIgLpcr, or mIgHGpcr) were used to amplify the sequences of the corresponding chain as described previously [32] (Table 2) . For each reaction, 2 µL of cDNA, 10 µL of 2x AmaR One PCR mixture (GeneDireX, Taichung City, Taiwan), 1 µL of 10 mM universal forward primer, 1 µL of 10 mM chain-specific reverse primer, and 6 µL of PCR-grade water were prepared. The condition of the thermal cycler was defined as follows: 94 • C for 3 min, 12 cycles of 95 • C for 30 s, 60 • C for 30 s (−0.5 • C per cycle), and 72 • C for 1 min; and directly followed by 18 cycles of 95 • C for 30 s, 56 • C for 30 s, and 72 • C for 1 min. The final extension was 5 min at 72 • C. The expected sizes of amplicon were all approximately 550-600 bp. The sequences were analyzed by the IgBlast tool of NCBI to verify the framework regions (FRs) and the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of each chain. Table 2 . The primers used in the PCR reactions. Along with the common forward primer (ISPCR), the primers for variable kappa (mIgKpcr), variable lambda (mIgLpcr) light chains, and variable heavy chain (mIgHGpcr) were utilized to amplify specific sequences.

Primer Sequence 

The sequences encoding for the light-chain variable region (VL) and heavy-chain variable region (VH) were linked by a (G 4 S) 3 linker, one of the most commonly used linkers in the construction of scFv [33] . The tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) signal sequence was introduced at the 5 end of the coding sequence to help the secretory process. The DNA sequence was synthesized (GeneScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and cloned into the pcDNA™3.1/V5-His TOPO vector by using BamHI and NotI restriction enzymes. After ligation, the plasmid was amplified by the One Shot™ TOP10 competent E. coli (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) and extracted by the EasyPrep EndoFree Maxi Plasmid Extraction Kit (TOOLs, New Taipei City, Taiwan). To transfect 1 L of Expi293F™ cells at a concentration of 3 × 10 6 cells/mL, 2.7 mL of ExpiFectamine™ 293 transfection reagent (Thermo) were pre-diluted in 50 mL of Opti-MEM (Gibco, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and mixed with 1 mg of the DNA plasmid pre-diluted in 50 mL of Opti-MEM (Gibco, Invitrogen). The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min prior to transfection. After adding the transfection mixture, the Expi293F™ cells were cultured at 37 • C, supplemented with 8% CO 2 with constant shaking at 125 rpm. Twenty hours after transfection, 5 mL of ExpiFectamine TM 293 transfection enhancer 1 (Gibco, Invitrogen) and 50 mL transfection enhancer 2 (Gibco, Invitrogen) were added to boost recombinant protein expression for a total of four days. At the end of the four-day transient expression, the supernatant and cell lysates of Expi293F™ cells were collected for SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analyses to confirm the expression level of the target scFv.

After filtration by using a 0.22 µm filter cup (Thermo), the supernatant was mixed with the binding buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl (Sigma, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1.5 M sodium chloride (Sigma), and 50 mM imidazole (Sigma), pH 7.8) with a ratio of 10:1. The HisPur™ Cobalt Resin (Thermo), which was pre-washed with sterile water and TBA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (Sigma), 150 mM sodium chloride (Sigma), 0.02% sodium azide (Sigma), pH 7.6) was added to the supernatant in the binding buffer in a ratio of 1:100. After overnight incubation at 4 • C with regular stirring, the cobalt resin was collected by the Glass Econo-Column ® Column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and washed with the 5-fold resin volume of wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (Sigma), 300 mM sodium chloride (Sigma), and 10 mM imidazole (Sigma), pH 7.6). The target protein was eluted by using the elution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (Sigma), 300 mM sodium chloride (Sigma), and 150 mM imidazole (Sigma), pH 7.8). The eluent was concentrated to 0.5 mL for further purification in PBS (Sigma) by using a Superdex™ 75 Increase column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) coupled to an AKTA UPC10 FPLC system (GE Healthcare).

Vero cells were seeded on 96-well plates (Thermo) one day before the challenge. The cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (dPBS, Gibco, Invitrogen) and inoculated with 100 µL of 500 TCID 50 /mL of PEDV-PT passage 5 (G2b PEDV) or PEDV-CV777 (G1 PEDV) diluted in the TPA medium, a DMEM-based medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 0.3% tryptose phosphate broth (Sigma), 0.02% yeast extract (Acumedia, Lansing, CA, USA), and 10 µg/mL trypsin (Gibco, Invitrogen). After a visible cytopathic effect (CPE), the cells were fixed with 80% acetone for 20 min and air-dried for another 30 min. After washing with PBS three times, the purified scFv was diluted to 5 µg/mL with PBS and applied to the wells for 1 h of incubation. To verify the signals, a blank filled with PBS was included as a background control. Following three washing steps with PBS, the 1000× diluted anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen) was used for another hour of incubation to probe the V5 tag on our recombinant scFv. The goat-anti-mouse IgG conjugated with HRP (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or conjugated with FITC (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were utilized as the secondary antibody and was incubated with the plates for 1 h. Sequentially, the EnVision-DAB+ system (Dako) was used to visualize the signals of HRP conjugated secondary antibody. On the other hand, a ZOE™ Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad) was operated to observe the signals of FITC conjugated secondary antibody and also DAPI mounting solution.

The purified virions of PEDV-PT and PEDV-CV777 were diluted to 2 µg/mL with coating buffer (KPL, SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA) and respectively coated onto the Nunc maxisoap strips (Thermo) at 4 • C overnight. The strips were washed with 200 µL of washing buffer (KPL, SeraCare) six times and sequentially blocked with 300 µL of blocking buffer (KPL, SeraCare) for 1 h. The recombinant scFv were serially two-fold diluted from 20 µg/mL to 1.25 µg/mL, and applied on the strips under the condition of 100 µL/well, Vaccines 2021, 9, 833 5 of 14 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with 200 µL of washing buffer (KPL, SeraCare) six times, the 1000× diluted anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen) was incubated with the strips for another hour to probe the V5 tag on the scFv. Following the six washing steps as mentioned above, the 1000× diluted goat-anti-mouse IgG HRP (KPL, SeraCare) was incubated with the strips for 1 h. Fifty microliters of ABTS ® Peroxidase Substrate (KPL, SeraCare) were added after the strips were completely washed, and the coloration step was stopped by providing 50 µL of stopping solution (KPL, SeraCare). The signals were detected at 405 nm by using the EMax Plus Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

The ectodomain of the S protein of PEDV (GeneBank no. HC070225-S), hereafter PEDV S protein, was constructed, expressed in Expi293F™ cells in a secreted form, and purified from the culture medium as described previously [34] . To conduct the immunoprecipitation pull-down assay, 25 pmol of PEDV S protein (700 kDa in molecular weight as a homotrimer) was mixed with 125 pmol of scFv (30 kDa in molecular weight) and incubated at 37 • C for 3 h with regular shaking. A negative control of scFv only without the PEDV S protein was included. After incubation, the mixture was filtrated by a 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) spin column (Millipore, MA, USA) with centrifugation under 11,000× g for 5 min. The flow-through was discarded, and the column was washed with 10 column volumes (400 µL/per wash, 10 washes) of dPBS to remove the unconjugated scFv. The mixture was concentrated to 100 µL after washing and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Then, 13 µL of the concentrated mixture were mixed with 2 µL of 10× NuPAGE Reducing agent (Invitrogen) and 5 µL of 5× NuPAGE Sampling buffer (Invitrogen), followed by thermal denaturation at 95 • C for 5 min before applying to the 10% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 (CBR-250, Thermo).

The binding ability of the scFv toward the PEDV S protein was estimated by SEC. First, 380 pmol of PEDV S protein was mixed with 830 pmol scFv and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture was filtered by a 0.22 µm spin column (Millipore) before being separated by a Superose 6 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in TBA buffer coupled to an AKTA UPC10 FPLC System (GE Healthcare). The protein sample was monitored by the UV absorbance at 280 nm (UV 280 ) and fractionated with 0.5 mL per fraction. The fractions that should signify UV 280 absorbance were analyzed by Western blotting. The proteins were denatured by adding 2 µL of 10× NuPAGE Reducing agent (Invitrogen), 5 µL of 5× NuPAGE Sampling buffer (Invitrogen), and boiled at 95 • C for 5 min. The protein samples were separated by a 10% SDS-PAGE separating gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad). The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk for 30 min, and probed with 1:5000 diluted anti-V5 tag antibody (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature. After thorough washing, the 1:10,000 diluted anti-mouse IgG antibody with HRP conjugation (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was added. After 1 h of incubation and adequate washing, the V5-tag-positive protein signals were detected by using ClarityTM Western ECL Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad) and visualized by a ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad).

Vero cells were maintained in the DMEM (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplied with 10% FBS (Gibco, Invitrogen) and antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco, Invitrogen) and were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates (Thermo) to reach 90% confluency on the following day. The purified scFv was two-fold serially diluted from 25 µg/mL to 0.78 µg/mL in the TPA medium and mixed with constant 200 TCID 50 /mL PEDV-PT-passage 5 or PEDV CV777 strain. The controls without adding scFv (the diluted virus only) and without treatment (normal cells fed in TPA medium) were also included in both assays. The virus-antibody mixtures were incubated at 37 • C for 2 h. The Vero cells were gently washed with 200 µL of TPA medium twice, and the virus-scFv mixtures or the controls were inoculated onto the cells in each well, respectively. The cytopathic effect (CPE) of PEDV, which was expected as syncytial cells, was examined at 24, 48, and 72 h after inoculation.

The complementary sequences of the variable regions of the heavy and light chains were successfully amplified by using three pairs of general primers. Two amplicons sized approximately 500-600 bp were obtained from PCRs targeting variable kappa light chain and variable heavy chain, respectively ( Figure 1A) , thus enabling the deduction of the protein sequences corresponding to the variable regions of E10E-1-10, a PEDV-PT-specific NmAb ( Figure 1B ). The framework regions (FRs) and complementary determining regions (CDRs) of the variable heavy chain and variable light chain, which belong to the kappa subtype, were analyzed and predicted by the IgBlast tool of NCBI.

Vero cells were maintained in the DMEM (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplied with 10% FBS (Gibco, Invitrogen) and antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco, Invitrogen) and were seeded on 96well cell culture plates (Thermo) to reach 90% confluency on the following day. The purified scFv was two-fold serially diluted from 25 μg/mL to 0.78 μg/mL in the TPA medium and mixed with constant 200 TCID50/mL PEDV-PT-passage 5 or PEDV CV777 strain. The controls without adding scFv (the diluted virus only) and without treatment (normal cells fed in TPA medium) were also included in both assays. The virus-antibody mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The Vero cells were gently washed with 200 μL of TPA medium twice, and the virus-scFv mixtures or the controls were inoculated onto the cells in each well, respectively. The cytopathic effect (CPE) of PEDV, which was expected as syncytial cells, was examined at 24, 48, and 72 h after inoculation.

The complementary sequences of the variable regions of the heavy and light chains were successfully amplified by using three pairs of general primers. Two amplicons sized approximately 500-600 bp were obtained from PCRs targeting variable kappa light chain and variable heavy chain, respectively ( Figure 1A) , thus enabling the deduction of the protein sequences corresponding to the variable regions of E10E-1-10, a PEDV-PT-specific NmAb ( Figure 1B) . The framework regions (FRs) and complementary determining regions (CDRs) of the variable heavy chain and variable light chain, which belong to the kappa subtype, were analyzed and predicted by the IgBlast tool of NCBI. 

The sequences of the variable regions of E10E-1-10 were linked with a (G4S)3 linker to form a functional scFv. The DNA sequence corresponding to the scFv was subcloned into the vector, pcDNA3.1-V5/His, and transfected to Expi293F™ cells for transient expression, and the expression was confirmed by using the Western blotting probed by the anti-V5 tag antibody (Figure 2A) . A high level of expression of the scFv was observed in Expi293F™ cells. Therefore, the expression of recombinant scFv was scaled up for purification by IMAC followed by SEC. The purity of the scFv was verified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining ( Figure 2C ). The SEC analysis indicated some aggregation 

The sequences of the variable regions of E10E-1-10 were linked with a (G 4 S) 3 linker to form a functional scFv. The DNA sequence corresponding to the scFv was subcloned into the vector, pcDNA3.1-V5/His, and transfected to Expi293F™ cells for transient expression, and the expression was confirmed by using the Western blotting probed by the anti-V5 tag antibody (Figure 2A) . A high level of expression of the scFv was observed in Expi293F™ cells. Therefore, the expression of recombinant scFv was scaled up for purification by IMAC followed by SEC. The purity of the scFv was verified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining ( Figure 2C ). The SEC analysis indicated some aggregation formed by the recombinant scFv ( Figure 2B ). The fractions corresponding to the main elution peak of scFv were collected and concentrated for the following experiments.

The recombinant scFv was used for the immunocytochemical staining (ICC) and immunofluorescence assay (IFA) to verify its binding to PEDV virions. Both cells infected with G1 PEDV (CV777, the historic vaccine strain) and G2b PEDV (PEDV-PT, the parental Vaccines 2021, 9, 833 7 of 14 strain of the scFv) were used to test the reactivity of the scFv. As expected, the recombinant scFv was able to probe the PEDV-infected cells with an obvious cytopathic effect as well as the peripherally scattered infected cells (Figure 3 ). Despite the same titers used to infect the cells, however, the morphologies of the cytopathic effects conferred by the two different PEDV strains were very different. The parental strain, PEDV-PT, formed small and scattered fusion cells, whereas CV777 formed giant fusion cells. Regardless of the cellular morphologies, the scFv was capable of recognizing both G1 and G2b viruses. The binding ability of scFv against homogenous and heterogeneous PEDV was estimated by ELISA. Both PEDV-PT and CV777 virions were coated on the plates and incubated with different amounts of the scFv. The parental IgG of scFv, E10E-1-10, was used as a positive control to calculate the sample-to-positive ratio (S/P ratio), which is defined as: S/P ratio = OD sample − OD negative control OD positive control − OD negative control The S/P ratio for both viruses positively correlated with the concentration of scFv. Furthermore, our scFv can cross-react to both virus strains, indicating the cross-reactivity of this recombinant scFv ( Figure 4 ). 

The recombinant scFv was used for the immunocytochemical staining (ICC) and immunofluorescence assay (IFA) to verify its binding to PEDV virions. Both cells infected with G1 PEDV (CV777, the historic vaccine strain) and G2b PEDV (PEDV-PT, the parental strain of the scFv) were used to test the reactivity of the scFv. As expected, the recombinant The S/P ratio for both viruses positively correlated with the concentration of scFv. Furthermore, our scFv can cross-react to both virus strains, indicating the cross-reactivity of this recombinant scFv (Figure 4) . 

To further confirm that the PEDV S protein contains the epitope recognized by the scFv, an immunoprecipitation combined pull-down assay and SEC analysis were performed. For the immunoprecipitation assay, the purified trimeric PEDV S glycoprotein, which harbored a V5 tag and a Hisx6 tag, was incubated with scFv for 3 h and size-filtrated by centrifugation with a 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) spin column. In the absence of the PEDV S protein, all scFv passed through the 100 kDa MWCO spin column in the control group, and no protein band was detected in the respective lane of the SDS-PAGE (lane 2 in Figure 5A ). The addition of the PEDV S protein indeed retained the scFv S/P ratio = OD sample − OD negative control OD positive control − OD negative control The S/P ratio for both viruses positively correlated with the concentration of scFv. Furthermore, our scFv can cross-react to both virus strains, indicating the cross-reactivity of this recombinant scFv (Figure 4) . 

To further confirm that the PEDV S protein contains the epitope recognized by the scFv, an immunoprecipitation combined pull-down assay and SEC analysis were performed. For the immunoprecipitation assay, the purified trimeric PEDV S glycoprotein, which harbored a V5 tag and a Hisx6 tag, was incubated with scFv for 3 h and size-filtrated by centrifugation with a 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) spin column. In the absence of the PEDV S protein, all scFv passed through the 100 kDa MWCO spin column in the control group, and no protein band was detected in the respective lane of the SDS-PAGE (lane 2 in Figure 5A ). The addition of the PEDV S protein indeed retained the scFv 

To further confirm that the PEDV S protein contains the epitope recognized by the scFv, an immunoprecipitation combined pull-down assay and SEC analysis were performed. For the immunoprecipitation assay, the purified trimeric PEDV S glycoprotein, which harbored a V5 tag and a His x6 tag, was incubated with scFv for 3 h and size-filtrated by centrifugation with a 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) spin column. In the absence of the PEDV S protein, all scFv passed through the 100 kDa MWCO spin column in the control group, and no protein band was detected in the respective lane of the SDS-PAGE (lane 2 in Figure 5A ). The addition of the PEDV S protein indeed retained the scFv after the 100 kDa MWCO filtration (lane 1 in Figure 5A ). SEC analysis of the PEDV S protein with excess scFv showed a similar elution volume as that without the scFv. The lack of an apparent shift in the elution volume could potentially be due to the relatively small change in the molecular size of the PEDV S protein when bound to the scFv ( Figure 5B ). To ascertain that the scFv was indeed co-eluted with the PEDV S protein during the SEC, the elution fractions corresponding to the PEDV S protein were analyzed by Western blotting. It was clear that some scFv co-eluted with the PEDV S protein (fractions 8-13), albeit the limited quantities relative to the unbound scFv that eluted later (fractions 22-25; Figure 5C ). change in the molecular size of the PEDV S protein when bound to the scFv ( Figure 5B ). To ascertain that the scFv was indeed co-eluted with the PEDV S protein during the SEC, the elution fractions corresponding to the PEDV S protein were analyzed by Western blotting. It was clear that some scFv co-eluted with the PEDV S protein (fractions 8-13), albeit the limited quantities relative to the unbound scFv that eluted later (fractions [22] [23] [24] [25] Figure 5C) . 

The neutralizing ability of scFv against virulent G2b PEDV (PEDV-PT) and G1 PEDV CV777 was evaluated by performing a neutralization test and the end-point cell viability test. The scFv was able to completely block the infection and the development of CPEand PEDV-PT-infected Vero cells at 24 hpi by using 6.25 μg/mL scFv, at 48 hpi by using 12.5 μg/mL scFv, and at 72 hpi by using 25 μg/mL scFv ( Figure 6 ; Table 3 ). As shown in Figure 6 , at 72 hpi, no obvious CPE was observed in the no-challenged control group and in the group supplemented with 25 μg/mL scFv compared with the severe CPEs in the challenged control group. No detectable viral neutralizing ability of the E10E-1-10 scFv against PEDV CV777 was noted (data not shown). 

The neutralizing ability of scFv against virulent G2b PEDV (PEDV-PT) and G1 PEDV CV777 was evaluated by performing a neutralization test and the end-point cell viability test. The scFv was able to completely block the infection and the development of CPEand PEDV-PT-infected Vero cells at 24 hpi by using 6.25 µg/mL scFv, at 48 hpi by using 12.5 µg/mL scFv, and at 72 hpi by using 25 µg/mL scFv ( Figure 6 ; Table 3 ). As shown in Figure 6 , at 72 hpi, no obvious CPE was observed in the no-challenged control group and in the group supplemented with 25 µg/mL scFv compared with the severe CPEs in the challenged control group. No detectable viral neutralizing ability of the E10E-1-10 scFv against PEDV CV777 was noted (data not shown). 

Since 2010, the highly virulent G2 PEDV strain has significantly impacted the pork industry in several American and Asia countries [1] . With the high enteropathogenicity of the G2 PEDV strain, the suffering neonatal piglets die within a few days after infection [1] . As an enteric pathogen, the primary route to protect the neonates is to elicit passive lactogenic protection from sows [12, 35] . However, stimulation of mucosal immunity by using a safe vaccine remains challenging, not least because of coronaviruses' high heterogeneity and high mutation potential [36] . Considering the commercial importance of the global pork industry, an effective therapeutic strategy that could cut down the losses of pig numbers due to PEDV outbreaks is urgently needed.

In this study, we established the repertoire of the VL chain and VH chain of the anti-PEDV S1 A neutralizing monoclonal antibody, E10E-1-10, based on which an engineered scFv was constructed. The selectivity of the scFv for the parental virus, namely PEDV-PT (G2 PEDV), and the heterologous virus, CV777 (G1 PEDV), were confirmed by the ICC, IFA, virion-based ELISAs, and SEC. While the scFv was capable of recognizing both G1 and G2b PEDV S proteins and neutralizing the homologous G2b PEDV, the scFv was unable to neutralize the heterologous G1 PEDV CV777. Indeed, effective antigen-binding does not necessarily warrant efficient neutralization against the target virus. Nevertheless, this PEDV-specific neutralizing scFv has the potential to be further developed into a therapeutic against homologous PEDV.

We previously reported that E10E-1-10 recognizes amino acids 435-485 of the G2b PEDV S protein [18] . Despite the two substitutions (V 441 I and S 477 A) within the G2b PEDV-PT S protein compared to the classical vaccine strain of G1 PEDV, CV777, our scFv could recognize both viruses, but it failed to neutralize the heterologous G1 PEDV CV777 [7] . Our result suggests that the V 441 I and S 477 A substitutions of the PEDV S protein may be critical for the binding strength between the paratope and epitope, therefore contributing to the different outcomes of virus neutralization. Interestingly, the V 441 I and S 477 A substitutions identified in the historic PEDV CV777 strain were not identified in the recently emerged Australian and European G1 PEDV strains, such as PEDV-25-10-2015-AUT (Australia, GenBank no. KT206204.1), PEDV-OH851 (USA, GenBank no. KJ399978), PEDV-UU (Netherland, GenBank no. KU985229.1), PEDV 1842/2016 (Italy, GenBank no. KY111278.1), and PEDV-GER/L00719/2014 (Germany, GenBank no. LM645058.1). The cross-reactivity and the neutralizing ability of the scFv against novel G1 PEDV strains and other G2 PEDV stains may be further characterized by constructing the strain-specific infectious clones [37] . The mechanisms and the critical determinant of the cross-reactivity and neutralizing ability of the S1 A -specific scFv may be further studied and characterized by comparing the ultrastructural differences of binding patterns between G1 and G2 PEDV strains.

In veterinary medicine, therapeutic mAbs have been developed for years, especially in the treatment of cancer and chronic inflammation in companion animals. Nevertheless, licensed therapeutic mAbs remain rare [38] . The caninized anti-IL31 Ab, also known as lokivetmab, has been granted a conditional license for use in improving canine atopic dermatitis [39] . Although the officially approved therapeutic Ab is rare in veterinary medicine, several mAbs are now in clinical trials for therapeutic purposes in response to the increasing market [38] . Along with the anti-cancer and anti-inflammation mAb, therapeutic mAbs have been developed and applied in treating several infectious diseases. The scFv and single-domain antibody (sdAb) against Staphylococcus aureus were designed and utilized to control bovine mastitis [40, 41] ; the use of mouse-pig chimeric antibody against Haemophilus parasuis showed increasing survival rates in vivo [42] ; the anti-foot and mouth disease (FMD) sdAb was able to reduce the viremia and viral shedding in pigs after challenge [43] .

The route of administrating therapeutic mAbs depends on the infection routes of the diseases of interest and the pharmacokinetics of the mAb. Based on our understanding of mucosal immunity and host defense systems, oral administration is the most direct way to block the infection of enteric antigen [12, 36] . Although there are challenges associated with oral delivery of proteinous therapeutics due to the low gastric pH, high proteolytic activity caused by gastric enzymes, bacterial metabolism, and other factors, successful oral administration of several therapeutic antibodies has been documented [44] . For instance, the administration of anti-F5 fimbriae scFv is used prophylactically for controlling neonatal calf colibacillosis [45] ; a reduction of oocysts in the feces of chickens fed with anti-Eimeria scFv-expressing plants was observed [46] ; and the oral administration of an scFv against PEDV was also developed and significantly increased the survival rates and resolved the clinical signs in neonatal piglets [37] .

In the future, the scFv described herein will be evaluated for the following: proteomic stability in a harsh environment mimicking the digestive tract, the effective dosage in neonatal pigs, the practical formula, and the efficacy of oral treatments in vivo, to evaluate its effectiveness in mitigating urgent pig losses during outbreaks in farms. To achieve this goal, further optimizations for improving the stability of scFv in the digestive tract, such as compacting with mucoadhesive polymers, packing into emulsions or nanoparticles, surface displayed by the probiotics, and applying with enzymatic inhibitors [47] . Based on the neutralizing antibody we had, it is worth establishing a method for developing oral therapeutic antibodies in pigs and referring to other economic animals.

The anti-PEDV S1 A NmAb-derived scFv was successfully constructed and expressed in milligram quantity by a mammalian protein expression system. This recombinant scFv was capable of probing the virus-infected cells as well as the virions of both G1 and G2 PEDVs by recognizing the PEDV S. The scFv had cross-reactivity and showed great binding ability toward both parental G2b PEDV-PT, a PEDV strain with high virulence, and G1 PEDV-CV777, a highly passaged vaccine strain with low virulence. This scFv only showed neutralizing ability in vitro against the parental G2b PEDV-PT but not the G1 PEDV-CV777. The breadth of the neutralizing ability of the scFv should be further characterized. Based on the neutralizing pattern, the anti-PEDV S1 A scFv presented herein may serve as a potential therapeutic candidate against the virulent G2b PEDV in the field.

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV): An Update on Etiology, Transmission, Pathogenesis, and Prevention and Control

Epidemic Diarrhea Virus: An Emerging and Re-emerging Epizootic Swine Virus

A New Coronavirus-like Particle Associated with Diarrhea in Swine

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection: Etiology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Immunoprophylaxis

Re-emergence of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in A Piglet-producing Farm in Northwestern Germany in 2019

Evolutionary and Genotypic Analyses of Global Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Strains

Phylogenetic Analysis of the Spike (S) Gene of the New Variants of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea Virus in Taiwan

Evolution, and Genotyping of Emergent Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Strains in the United States

Current Status of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea (PED) in European Pigs

Emerging and Re-emerging Coronaviruses in Pigs

Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease: A Review of 4 Years with Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea Virus and Porcine Deltacoronavirus in the United States and Canada

Host Factors Affecting Generation of Immunity Against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in Pregnant and Lactating Swine and Passive Protection of Neonates

Strategies for Design and Application of Enteric Viral Vaccines

Efficacy of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines 2020, 8, 642

Status of Vaccines for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in the United States and Canada

The 3.1 Å Cryo-electron Microscopy Structure of the Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Spike Protein in the Prefusion Conformation

Cell Attachment Domains of the Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Spike Protein Are Key Targets of Neutralizing Antibodies

Identification of Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Novel Conformational Epitopes of the Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea Virus Spike

Identification of the Epitope Region Capable of Inducing Neutralizing Antibodies against the Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus

Spike Protein Region (aa 636789) of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus is Essential for Induction of Neutralizing Antibodies

The S2 Glycoprotein Subunit of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Contains Immunodominant Neutralizing Epitopes

Development of Therapeutic Antibodies for the Treatment of Diseases

Therapeutic Antibodies for Infectious Diseases

Antibody Therapies for the Prevention and Treatment of Viral Infections

Current Status of Dengue Therapeutics Research and Development

Universal Influenza Virus Vaccines and Therapeutic Antibodies

Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of the Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody mAb114 Targeting Ebola Virus Glycoprotein (VRC 608): An Open-label Phase 1 Study

A Review of SARS-CoV-2 and the Ongoing Clinical Trials

Recombinant Antibodies in Veterinary Medicine: An Update. Front

Egg Yolk Antibodies (IgY) and Their Applications in Human and Veterinary Health: A Review

A Guide for In-house Design of Template-switch-based 5 Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends Systems

A Simplified Workflow for Monoclonal Antibody Sequencing

Fusion Protein Linkers: Property, Design and Functionality

Efficacy of Heat-labile Enterotoxin B Subunit-adjuvanted Parenteral Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Trimeric Spike Subunit Vaccine in Piglets

Stage of Gestation at Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection of Pregnant Swine Impacts Maternal Immunity and Lactogenic Immune Protection of Neonatal Suckling Piglets

Mucosal Vaccines and Technology

Single Chain Fragment Variable (scFv) Antibodies Targeting the Spike Protein of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Provide Protection against Viral Infection in Piglets

Challenges and Opportunities for Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Veterinary Oncology

A Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose Determination Trial of Lokivetmab (ZTS-00103289), a Caninized

Monoclonal Antibody in Client Owned Dogs with Atopic Dermatitis

Construction of ScFv that Bind Both Fibronectin-binding Protein A and Clumping Factor A of Stapylococcus Aureus

Staphylococcus Aureus β-hemolysin-neutralizing Single-domain Antibody Isolated from Phage Display Library of Indian Desert Camel

Development of a Neutralizing Mouse-pig Chimeric Antibody with Therapeutic Potential Against Haemophilus Parasuis in Pichia pastoris

Passive Immunization of Pigs with Bispecific Llama Single-domain Antibody Fragments Against Foot-and-mouth Disease and Porcine Immunoglobulin

Challenges and Future Prospects for the Delivery of Biologics: Oral Mucosal, Pulmonary, and Transdermal Routes

Reduction of Enterotoxin Induced Fluid Accumulation in Ileal Loops of Neonatal Calves with Anti-F5 Fimbriae Recombinant Antibody

We thank the Protein Facility of the Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, for supporting mammalian cell-based recombinant protein production, protein purification, and biophysics characterizations. 

[CrossRef]