key: cord-0763966-heyf6iuu
authors: Rallis, Kathrine S.; Wang, Yuxiao Alice
title: Overview of Undergraduate Oncology Interest Groups: Medical Students’ Insights from a National Collaborative Network
date: 2020-09-24
journal: J Cancer Educ
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01887-y
sha: f6d6d6fbea490580d3b73eba16d9d812acc72677
doc_id: 763966
cord_uid: heyf6iuu

nan

To the Editor, We read with interest the article by Malik et al. [1] , "Mapping the Current State of Canadian Medical School Oncology Interest Groups," characterizing the activity level, resource availability, challenges, and employment perceptions reported by medical student leaders of Canadian Oncology Interest Groups (OIGs). As previous medical student lead of a London medical school OIG, and ambassador for the British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS), this article resonates with us. We agree that OIGs offer tremendous potential to cultivate student interest in oncology alongside undergraduate medical curricula, though their full potential has yet to be recognized. In response to this, we offer insights from our experience with OIGs from our role in BONUS, highlight barriers in their function, and propose strategies to maximize benefits.

BONUS is a student-led collaborative network for undergraduate oncology societies across the United Kingdom (UK) that aims to increase collaborations between OIGs and promote oncology amongst students. In October 2019, we identified 21 OIGs each corresponding to one out of 42 recognized UK medical schools. Of these, 20 groups were active. The majority of OIGs were based at larger institutions, with smaller medical schools less likely to feature one. Anecdotally, UK OIGs comprise 5-15 student committee members, far more than the 2-3 reported in Canada [1] . Nevertheless, we report similar goals including increasing oncology exposure, enhancing education, promoting specialty selection, and establishing student-mentor relations. Events are also held, which include talks, conferences, networking meetings, and mentorships. Additionally, UK OIGs often "adopt" and support local cancer charities.

Although we face similar barriers including time restrictions, limited funding, and unsustainable student interest, we also encounter challenges recruiting mentors. Less than 25% of all contacted mentors agreed to participate in an organized mentorship program in 2019-2020, the results of which are due to be published. This was even more discouraging considering the high volume of student applications. Secondly, limited technology skills pose an obstacle in creating online platforms to advertise oncology-related opportunities including research projects, conferences, competitions, and electives [2] . Third, we agree that maintaining continuity is challenging; with committees reformed annually, connections are lost, and collaborations discontinued. Medical students who assume leadership roles are predominantly in senior years and face more time restrictions despite having more experience and connections, thus creating a vacancy upon graduation.

To address these issues, we strongly advocate for medical schools to provide infrastructure for online platforms, liaising with faculty oncologists to produce research, mentorship, and shadowing experiences. OIGs can assist in recruiting mentors and sourcing opportunities. Secondly, we propose the formation of a Canadian OIG network. From hosting events open to all students, to organizing conferences, UK OIGs have frequently succeeded in collaborations. Collaborations can sustain interest by increasing student numbers which may dwindle at single institutions. In addition, with the expanding role of telemedicine amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [3] , further emphasis should be placed on creating online education and sharing resources. Virtual symposia are a promising strategy offering access to all [4, 5] . Moreover, professional associations are key in supporting OIGs through funding or providing points of contact. Elective bursaries, academic prizes, and annual career days are effective at motivating students and cultivating specialty interest [6, 7] . We urge oncologists to proactively seek out undergraduate OIGs to inspire a future generation of successors.

Mapping the current state of Canadian medical school oncology interest groups

Internet skills of medical faculty and students: is there a difference?

Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19

Scientists discover upsides of virtual meetings

Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: the TROG 2020 experience

Rapid response: attracting students and junior doctors to apply for specialty training: lessons from the NANSIG-SBNS Neurosurgery Careers Day

Life science professional societies expand undergraduate education efforts

Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services

Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education

A nationwide medical student assessment of oncology education