key: cord-0759614-4aa76lxy authors: Wi, Yu Mi; Lim, Su Jin; Kim, Si-Ho; Lim, Seungjin; Lee, Su Jin; Ryu, Byung-Han; Hong, Sun In; Cho, Oh-Hyun; Moon, Kyunglan; Hong, Kyung-Wook; Kim, Sunjoo; Bae, In-Gyu title: Response System for and Epidemiological Features of COVID-19 in Gyeongsangnam-do Province in South Korea date: 2020-07-16 journal: Clin Infect Dis DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa967 sha: dc3dfc242e0b5c561fef0efbddebb0aa9ae7b488 doc_id: 759614 cord_uid: 4aa76lxy BACKGROUND: The South Korean government has been combating COVID-19 outbreak using public information and extensive viral screening. We described the application of the Korean response system in one province and outlined the epidemiological features of COVID-19 in the cohort. METHODS: A Rapid Response Team tracked the patients’ activities and identified close contacts. A Patient Management Team made decisions regarding the severity of illness, hospital allocation depending on severity, and time of discharge. A national medical center with 155 beds and 4 university-affiliated hospitals with 48 negative-pressure isolation rooms were dedicated for COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: As of April 15, 17 400 residents were tested, of whom 111 were confirmed positive cases. Of the 111 patients, 78 were cured and discharged, 2 recovered after mechanical ventilation, and none died. One healthcare worker at the national center tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. All 412 staff members at the center were tested, but there were no additional infections. Cough (30.0 %) was the most common initial symptom, whereas anosmia and ageusia were the first symptoms in 14.7% and 15.7% of the patients, respectively. Overall, 25 patients (22.5%) reported having no symptoms at admission and 7 (6.3%) remained asymptomatic at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A response system that enabled the early detection of COVID-19 cases, including asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases, and timely quarantine of these patients and their contacts, along with efficient allocation of medical resources, was the key to curbing the COVID-19 outbreak in Gyeongsangnam-do Province. In December 2019, unexplained pneumonia was first reported in Wuhan, China, and on January 7, 2020, the Chinese government officially announced that the pneumonia was caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1] . The World Health Organization on March 11 declared the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a global pandemic. As of April 15, SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19, was reported to have infected nearly 2 million people in 213 countries, resulting in more than 123 000 deaths [2] . The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in South Korea was announced on January 20. As of April 15, a total of 534 552 residents had been tested, of whom 10 591 were confirmed positive cases and 225 died [3] . While many countries imposed lockdowns and closed their borders to combat COVID-19, South Korea adopted extensive viral screening of the population for patient discovery, isolation of infected people, and quarantine of their close contacts identified through contact tracing [4, 5] . We evaluated the application of the Korean response system in one province and analyzed the epidemiological features of COVID-19 in the cohort. Gyeongsangnam-do Province has a population of approximately 3.5 million (as of December 31, 2019). On January 24, a few days after the first travel-associated case of reported in South Korea, 20 local public health centers and 16 hospitals were designated to screen people for COVID-19. All screening centers were installed outside the medical buildings and followed a tent, container, or drive-through model with a patient flow that did M a n u s c r i p t 5 not overlap with the movement of the general patient population. All patients who had visited the epidemic area, regardless of the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms or fever, were screened at the screening centers. On February 20, the first two cases were confirmed in Gyeongsangnam-do Province. The province's Rapid Response Team (RRT) and Patient Management Team (PMT) were organized according to the Korean government's policy [6] . The RRT investigated each case to determine the patient's recent activities and identify people they have had contact with by interviewing patients, examining medical facility records, tracking mobile phone or credit card data, and checking CCTV footage from 1 day before the appearance of symptoms (2 days since April 2). Any enclosed space that the patient was known to have visited was closed and disinfected and then reopened a day later. The information on a patient's activities was uploaded on the province's website and disseminated through phone alerts to allow other people to determine whether they may have crossed paths with the confirmed patient. Contact persons identified through contact tracing and voluntary notifications were asked to self-isolate at home for 2 weeks, with their COVID-19 symptoms monitored every day. If a contact did not develop any COVID-19 symptoms, he/she was released on the 14 th day from the last date of contact with the confirmed patient. However, medical workers (including caregivers), residents or staff members of living facilities, students and staff at schools, household contacts, and contacts over the age of 65 were examined on the 13 th day from the last date of contact and released on the 14 th day if they tested negative. The province's governor or spokesperson provided COVID-19-related updates through the media and website twice a day (Table 1) . A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 6 Masan Medical Center (MMC), a national healthcare facility with 155 beds in the province, was prepared for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and 4 university-affiliated hospitals with 48 negative-pressure isolation rooms were prepared for patients with severe COVID-19. Infectious disease specialists were dispatched from a university hospital to MMC. All confirmed patients were admitted to MMC or one of the four hospitals according to their severity. Those who were symptom-free and tested negative twice were released. The PMT, consisting of provincial health officers and infectious disease specialists from each hospital, determined a confirmed patient's severity and decided hospital allocation depending on severity. The team shared patients' clinical information 24 hours a day with KakaoTalk (Korean instant messenger service) and reallocated patients from the dedicated national center to one of the four hospitals or vice versa when there was a change in the patients' condition. Patients with impaired consciousness, hypotension, and a respiratory rate of ≥ 25/minute and requiring an O2 mask to maintain a SpO2 of ≥ 95% were considered as serious patients and transferred to one of the four hospitals as directed by the PMT. An improved patient was transferred back to MMC to free up the negative-pressure isolation rooms for other more serious patients. PMT also decided the discharge date of a patient. In consultation with the PMT, the MMC formulated detailed plans for safe and effective care of COVID-19 patients ( Table 2 ). All medical personnel could don and doff the personal protective equipment (PPE) in a designated space, enter the ward using a fixed route, and exit after showering. Symptomatic staff could return to work only after testing negative for COVID-19. Although the principle was to allocate 1 room per person, more than 2 patients were allowed to enter the same room when they could maintain a distance of at least 2 meters from each other. On the day of hospitalization, patients underwent portable chest A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 7 radiography, while additional blood tests were performed for those with fever, underlying comorbidity, or confirmed pneumonia on chest radiographs. These patients were administered medications such as lopinavir/ritonavir or hydroxychloroquine according to MMC's treatment guidelines. We included a total of 111 patients with confirmed COVID-19 to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreak in Gyeongsangnamdo Province until April 15. A confirmed case of COVID-19 was defined as a positive result on a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab specimens. Sputum was also collected for the test if possible. Demographic data, information on underlying co-morbidities, clinical features, and laboratory and radiological findings were collected at presentation. Therapeutic data and outcomes were also obtained during admission. The diagnosis of pneumonia was based on radiographic evidence. Patient data was censored at the time of data cutoff, which occurred on April 15, 2020. The Samsung Changwon Hospital's institutional review board approved this study with an authorization agreement from MMC. Discrete data were presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation or the median and interquartile range after the normality of data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. All analyses were conducted with SPSS Statistics 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 8 As of April 15, 2020, a total of 17 400 residents had been tested, of whom 111 patients were confirmed positive cases: 70 cases were related to travel to Daegu-si or Gyeongsangbuk-do Province, 24 to local outbreaks, 15 to overseas travel, and 2 to travel to Busan-si ( Figure 1) [4]. Of the 111 patients, 78 were cured and discharged and 2 patients recovered after undergoing mechanical ventilation; there were no casualties. As of April 15, the province's preliminary case fatality rate was 0% [5] . The oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swab test for SARS-CoV-2 became positive again in 3 patients who had been discharged after two consecutively negative results (7, 15, and 16 in Figure 1 [B]). On April 2, a healthcare worker at MMC tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Subsequently, all of the 412 healthcare workers, including 9 contacts were tested for COVID-19, but no additional case was documented (109 in Figure 1 [B]). The healthcare worker's son (110 in Figure 1 [B]) was the only confirmed patient among the people tested for COVID-19. The clinical characteristics of the 111 patients in Gyeongsangnam-do Province are provided in Table 3 . The mean age of the patients was 41.3 ± 19.0 years, and 51.4% were female. The most prevalent underlying disease was hypertension (18.9%), followed by diabetes (7.2%) and solid tumors (3.6%). Seventy-four patients (66.7%) had clear information regarding the specific date of exposure. The mean incubation period was 6.5 ± 4.3 days (range 0-17). Five patients (7.5%) among patients who develop symptoms did not show symptoms until 14 days after infection. The mean interval from symptom onset to admission was 5.3 ± 5.4 days (range 0-32). Cough (30.0 %) was the most common initial symptom, followed by myalgia A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 9 (26.1%). Only 25.2% of patients complained of fever, whereas anosmia and ageusia were the first symptoms in 14.7% and 15.7% of patients, respectively. A total of 25 patients (22.5%) reported having no symptoms at admission, of whom 18 patients developed symptoms after an average of 2.6 ± 1.9 days (range 1-8), while the remaining 7 (6.3%) remained asymptomatic at discharge. Pneumonia developed 7.0 days after the onset of initial symptoms, on average, in 44.1% of the patients. On admission, lymphopenia (<1 500 mm 3 ) was present in 52.2% of the patients, thrombocytopenia in 7.5%, and leukopenia in 25.4%. The mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was 24.0 ± 10.8 days (range 5-58) after symptom onset. This study described the response system adopted by a South Korean province to control the COVID-19 outbreak and the epidemiological features of COVID-19 in the cohort. The response system, which included the RRT and PMT, and the efficient allocation of medical resources were the key to controlling the outbreak in Gyeongsangnam-do Province. The response system helped in the early detection and quarantine of confirmed patients and their contacts. It made it possible to identify even patients who were asymptomatic or in the early stages. The Korean government has provided rapid, large-scale diagnostic tests to detect COVID-19 patients. As of April, a total of 5 diagnostic agents were provided fast-track approval, and the maximum daily testing capacity increased from 3 000 people in February to approximately 20 000 people in April [7] . In addition to these large-scale diagnostic tests, the strategy of tracking mobile phone and credit card data and using CCTV footage facilitated rapid and A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 10 effective contact tracing. This in turn enabled the RRT to quarantine confirmed patients and their contacts in a timely manner to avoid additional transmission, which could contribute to reducing the overall size of an outbreak or bringing it under control over a longer time period. The RRT also quarantined and disinfected the enclosed spaces that the patients had visited. Aerosols from infected persons may pose an inhalation threat in closed areas, particularly if the ventilation is poor. A recent study showed that experimentally produced aerosols containing SARS-CoV-2 virions remained infectious in tissue-culture assays, with only a slight reduction in infectivity during the 3-hour period of observation [8] . The early detection and quarantine of both confirmed patients and their contacts helped identify patients who were asymptomatic or in the early stages, which may have resulted in the lower case fatality rate. Of the 111 patients in Gyeongsangnam-do Province, only 2 patients had received intensive care and none had died as of April 15. In Chinese studies, the overall case fatality rate was 1.3%-2.3% [9] [10] [11] . However, the patient outcome differed markedly among geographic regions, highlighting the magnitude of the surge in cases and ease of access to hospitalization [9] [10] [11] . In our study, 66.7% of the patients were identified through the contact investigation or examination of the symptoms during self-isolation. A previous study have shown that asymptomatic carriers identified from close contacts were prone to be mildly ill during hospitalization [12] . In addition, the PMT's monitoring of information on patient severity on a daily basis prevented severely ill patients from awaiting hospitalization. Therefore, early identification of patients and appropriate access to medical care when infected is vital for improving chances of survival. Detecting asymptomatic or early-stage patients allowed us to describe the natural history and diverse initial symptoms of the disease. COVID-19 can cause mild flu-like symptoms, including fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, and fatigue, whereas more serious forms can cause A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 11 severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and organ failure, which can be fatal [9] [10] [11] 13] . A study from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces of China covering 1 099 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 showed that the most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%) [9] . In our study, cough (30.0%) and myalgia (26.1%) were the most common initial symptoms. Only 25.2% of patients complained of fever as an initial symptom of COVID-19. Intriguingly, anosmia and ageusia occurred as an initial symptom in 14.7% and 15.7% of patients, respectively. These findings are in line with the results of a previous cross-sectional survey on the prevalence of olfactory and taste disorders in COVID-19 patients [14] . In that study, 33.9% reported at least one taste or olfactory disorder and 18.6% both. In addition to anosmia and ageusia, one patient presented conjunctivitis in our study. A previous study reported that conjunctivitis developed in 0.8% of the study population [9] . Interestingly, our study found a higher proportion of patients requiring 14 days or more to develop symptoms (7.5%) than previous studies (1-5%) [9, 11, 15] . Therefore, additional research on mild cases is needed to understand the initial epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 for early detection and quarantine to control onward transmission of COVID-19. Notably, a total of 25 patients (22.5%) in our study reported having no symptoms at admission, of whom 18 patients developed symptoms after the mean duration of 2.6 ± 1.9 days (range 1-8) and 7 patients (6.3%) remained asymptomatic until discharge. This finding is consistent with that of a previous study, in which 56% (n=27) of residents who tested positive reported having no symptoms at the time of diagnosis in a skilled nursing facility. Some of them (24/27) developed symptoms subsequently, and 17 of the 24 specimens had viable virus by culture 1 to 6 days before the development of symptoms [16] . Several studies have confirmed the high level of SARS-CoV-2 shedding in the upper respiratory tract even A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 12 before symptom development [15, 17] . Recent reports have also suggested that patients might be infectious 1 to 3 days before symptom onset and that up to 40-50% of cases may be attributable to transmission from asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people [18, 19] . Because asymptomatic cases would continue to contribute to transmission, symptom-based screening alone is not enough to control transmission in a COVID-19 outbreak as a high proportion of infectious cases would go undetected. In Gyeongsangnam-do Province, mass screening was performed in highly vulnerable facilities, such as nursing hospitals and nursing homes. These facilities restricted the entry of visitors and non-essential personnel and made it obligatory for all staff members, residents, and visitors to wear a facial mask. These response measures may have helped control onward transmission of COVID-19. Interestingly, 3 recovered patients tested positive again using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. These patients had been asymptomatic at first diagnosis and taken no medication. A computed tomography of the chest had been performed during previous admission and immediately after readmission, images of which did not report any abnormal finding. It remains uncertain whether recovered COVID-19 patients who test positive again using RT-PCR can transmit the infection to others through close contact. Investigations are underway to understand this aspect. This study has several limitations. First, we described the demographic characteristics of the 111 COVID-19 patients, but we could not compare the characteristics with those of individuals who tested negative. Comparative research involving people with negative results is needed to obtain better information on the demographic characteristics of COVID-19 patients. Second, not all close contacts were confirmed to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 before their release from quarantine, which suggests that the strategy could have missed some asymptomatic infections among the contacts. For efficient use of the limited diagnostic A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 13 capacity, we focused on several groups, including high risk groups for mass outbreak, groups with high infection rate, and groups showing poor outcomes, such as medical workers (including caregivers), residents or staff members of living facilities, students and staff at schools, household contacts, and contacts over the age of 65. Finally, although our response system was used only as an auxiliary tool to rapidly track confirmed COVID-19 cases in compliance with legal provisions and limitations, the disclosure of a patient's whereabouts and activities for public benefit violate the patient's privacy. In South Korea, people have agreed that infectious disease information should be disclosed in a transparent and timely manner. Following the Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak in 2015, the Korean government was legally allowed to collect mobile phone, credit card, and other data from patients to reconstruct their recent whereabouts [20] . This strategy has been continually modified, but it is still needed constant efforts to protect privacy. Whether South Korea's contact tracing strategy can be generalized to other locations worldwide would depend on their legal systems and public consensus. The at-scale diagnostic capacity resulted in early detection and quarantine of confirmed patients and their contacts, and the efficient allocation of medical resources resulted in lower case fatality rates. This response system may have helped us identify asymptomatic or presymptomatic patients and control onward transmission of COVID-19. The government continued to advise people to wear masks at all times in public, wash their hands, avoid crowds and meetings, and maintain a 2-meter distance from each other. The response system implemented in Gyeongsangnam-do will be successful only with public cooperation. M a n u s c r i p t 14 M a n u s c r i p t A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China World Health Organization The updates on COVID-19 in Korea as of 15 April Contact Transmission of COVID-19 in South Korea: Novel Investigation Techniques for Tracing Contacts Epidemiology and Case Management Team, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Early Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of 28 Cases of Coronavirus Disease in South Korea COVID-19 Response and Management Guidelines Republic of Korea. Coronavirus Disease-19 Republic of Korea. COVID-19 Information for Foreigners Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing Mild or Moderate Covid-19 Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in SARS-CoV-2 patients: a cross-sectional study The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 -Singapore Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 Quarantine Management Team, COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center Coronavirus Disease-19: Quarantine Framework for Travelers Entering Korea Note: ALT, Alanine aminotransferase Aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BUN, Blood urea nitrogen National Early Warning Score; ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Chain Reaction White blood cells *One patient received both mechanical ventilation and ECMO We thank the relevant ministries of South Gyeongsang Province, the medical staff at the health centers, and the medical facilities for their efforts to combat COVID-19. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing. Conflict of Interest: None to declare A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t