key: cord-0750979-fh6kcrkg authors: Jung, Hi Eun; Lee, Heung Kyu title: Current Understanding of the Innate Control of Toll-like Receptors in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection date: 2021-10-22 journal: Viruses DOI: 10.3390/v13112132 sha: 71c89729bea10c9a4f80e0555074a0ac6085c2c5 doc_id: 750979 cord_uid: fh6kcrkg The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, threatens the entire world. It has affected every aspect of life and increased the burden on both healthcare and socioeconomic systems. Current studies have revealed that excessive inflammatory immune responses are responsible for the severity of COVID-19, which suggests that anti-inflammatory drugs may be promising therapeutic treatments. However, there are currently a limited number of approved therapeutics for COVID-19. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which recognize microbial components derived from invading pathogens, are involved in both the initiation of innate responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection and the hyperinflammatory phenotype of COVID-19. In this review, we provide current knowledge on the pivotal role of TLRs in immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection and demonstrate the potential effectiveness of TLR-targeting drugs on the control of hyperinflammation in patients with COVID-19. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a threat to human life. Since the first case of infection was reported in China in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19, has been rapidly transmitted from person to person worldwide. Confirmed cases of global COVID-19 have surpassed 238 million, and more than 4.85 million people have died from the disease according to researchers at Johns Hopkins University. Patients with COVID- 19 have reported a wide range of symptoms, ranging from mild to severe illness, with several studies suggesting that robust expression of proinflammatory cytokines is involved in the pathogenesis of the most severe cases [1] [2] [3] . The dysregulated release of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, are related to a poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19 [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] . SARS-CoV-2, which belongs to the Betacoronavirus genus, is an enveloped, positivesense, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) virus. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic. Before the outbreak, two members of the Betacoronavirus genus, SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV), had previously been documented to have caused epidemics: SARS-CoV infected 8422 people and killed 916 in 2003 according to the WHO, and MERS-CoV caused 2574 confirmed cases with 886 deaths from 2012 until June 2021 [9, 10] . These zoonotic coronaviruses circulated in bats, jumping to humans via intermediate hosts, and resulted in public health emergencies. Compared with these two epidemics, the current COVID-19 outbreak has led to an unprecedented burden on both healthcare and socioeconomic systems. While the mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 triggers immune responses has not been fully elucidated, much research has been devoted to investigating the virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and host immune responses. In this review, we summarize During an infection, the immune system works to protect the host from foreign invaders. Innate immune responses are the first line of defense against pathogens entering the body and are responsible for the priming of adaptive immune responses. Innate immune cells express pattern-recognition receptors, such as TLRs, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors, C-type lectin receptors, and absent in melanoma-2-like receptors, to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on pathogens [36] . Among them, TLRs play a crucial role in the activation of innate immune responses against various pathogens (Table 1) . TLRs are expressed in immune cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells, including type II pneumocytes which highly express ACE2 in the airways [37] [38] [39] . The activation of TLRs initiates the recruitment of adaptor molecules, such as MyD88 and TRIF, that lead to the subsequent production of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines via the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs). According to the latest research [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] , several TLRs are involved in the sensing of PAMPs from SARS-CoV-2. It has been suggested that TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7/8, and TLR9 contribute to antiviral responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection ( Figure 2 ). During an infection, the immune system works to protect the host from foreign invaders. Innate immune responses are the first line of defense against pathogens entering the body and are responsible for the priming of adaptive immune responses. Innate immune cells express pattern-recognition receptors, such as TLRs, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors, C-type lectin receptors, and absent in melanoma-2-like receptors, to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on pathogens [36] . Among them, TLRs play a crucial role in the activation of innate immune responses against various pathogens (Table 1) . TLRs are expressed in immune cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells, including type II pneumocytes which highly express ACE2 in the airways [37] [38] [39] . The activation of TLRs initiates the recruitment of adaptor molecules, such as MyD88 and TRIF, that lead to the subsequent production of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines via the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs). According to the latest research [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] , several TLRs are involved in the sensing of PAMPs from SARS-CoV-2. It has been suggested that TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7/8, and TLR9 contribute to antiviral responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection ( Figure 2 ). Currently, 10 members of the TLR family have been identified in humans. TLRs are currently classified into two categories based on their cellular localization [64] : TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10 belong to cell surface TLRs that recognize microbial components including proteins and lipids derived from invading pathogens, whereas TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 are intracellular TLRs that sense nucleic acid ligands [65] . TLR2 is a surface receptor that recognizes diverse ligands derived from viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites [66] . TLR2 forms heterodimers with TLR1 and TLR6, utilizing MyD88 for signal transduction. While the involvement of TLR2 in immune responses Currently, 10 members of the TLR family have been identified in humans. TLRs are currently classified into two categories based on their cellular localization [64] : TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10 belong to cell surface TLRs that recognize microbial components including proteins and lipids derived from invading pathogens, whereas TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 are intracellular TLRs that sense nucleic acid ligands [65] . TLR2 is a surface receptor that recognizes diverse ligands derived from viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites [66] . TLR2 forms heterodimers with TLR1 and TLR6, utilizing MyD88 for signal transduction. While the involvement of TLR2 in immune responses against coronavirus infections has not been elucidated, a recent study revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein is sensed by TLR2 [40, 67] . Zheng and colleagues reanalyzed the expression of MyD88 and TLRs in patients with different severity grades of COVID-19 using a public dataset and found that the expression of MyD88, TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR8, and TLR9 was increased in patients with severe to critical illness. To clarify which TLRs were essential for the sensing of Betacoronavirus, they infected bone marrow-derived macrophages deficient in TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, or TLR9 with mouse hepatitis virus, which belongs to the Betacoronavirus genus, and found that TLR2 deficiency resulted in the abrogated expression of inflammatory cytokine genes. They then investigated the role of TLR2 in SARS-CoV-2 infection using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with a TLR2 inhibitor. They performed experiments using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 to identify the viral components responsible for TLR2 activation, and structural proteins were identified as promising targets. Among four viral structural proteins identified, the E protein activated the TLR2 signaling pathway. In addition, the authors found that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein induced TLR2-dependent inflammation in mice and that the TLR2 inhibitor protected mice from lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein is a novel ligand for TLR2 activation. However, a separate group identified the SARS-CoV-2 S protein as a TLR2 ligand in non-peer reviewed preprints [68] . They observed that recombinant S protein induced inflammatory mediators in macrophages, monocytes, and human lung epithelial A549 cells via the activation of the TLR2-mediated NF-κB pathway. Indeed, intraperitoneal injection of recombinant S protein triggered TLR2-mediated proinflammatory cytokine production in mice. While further studies are required, these results offer valuable insight into TLR2-dependent immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection. TLR4 is well known to recognize lipopolysaccharides produced by Gram-negative bacteria. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, an in silico study suggested a possible interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and TLR4 [69] . Investigators used a computational approach to study the interaction between the S protein and host receptors. Interestingly, they found that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein strongly bound to TLR4, suggesting a potential role for TLR4 in SARS-CoV-2 recognition. This hypothesis has been supported by other evidence demonstrating that TLR4 and its downstream signaling molecules are significantly upregulated in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to those with mild illness [40, 70] . Recently, two groups confirmed that the S protein leads to proinflammatory cytokine production in monocytes and macrophages in a TLR4-dependent manner [43, 44] . However, the identity of TLR4-binding sites in the S protein remains unclear. Shirato and Kizaki showed that the S1 subunit (residues 16-671) induced the activation of the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways as well as subsequent proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages [44] . S1-induced proinflammatory responses in macrophages were abrogated following treatment with a TLR4 antagonist or by transfection with TLR4 siRNA. On the other hand, Zhao and colleagues demonstrated that only the trimeric S protein, rather than its N-terminal domain (NTD) (residues 1-307) or RBD (residues 319-541), activates immune responses in macrophages [43] . They suggested that a conformational binding site composed of the RBD and NTD of the S protein was likely to interact with TLR4. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between TLR4 and the S protein. Nucleic acid-sensing TLRs (TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9) are localized in endosomes to prevent the recognition of self-DNA or -RNA. As SARS-CoV-2 is an ssRNA virus and produces double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) during replication in host cells [34, 71] , intracellular RNA sensors are thought to be involved in the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 infection. TLR3 senses dsRNA in endosomes, and TLR3 stimulation leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs via the activation of the TRIF signaling pathway. In contrast, ssRNA is recognized by TLR7 and TLR8, which use MyD88 as a downstream adapter protein. Recently, the roles of TLR3 and TLR7 in antiviral responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified using three-dimensional lung multicellular spheroids [41] . The relative expression levels of TLR3 and TLR7, as well as the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs, were elevated in SARS-CoV-2-infected multicellular spheroids, and both IRF3 and NF-κB appeared to participate in the signaling pathway downstream of TLR3 and TLR7. Furthermore, another group demonstrated that an ssRNA fragment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA was responsible for the activation of the TLR7/8-dependent MyD88 pathway in human DCs [45] . As TLR7/8 is activated by guanosine (G)-and uridine (U)-rich ssRNA [72] , this group scanned putative TLR7/8 ligands within the SARS-CoV-2 genome and selected two GU-rich ssRNA sequences-termed SCV2-RNA-to test their hypothesis. Using human monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs), the authors found that SCV2-RNA treatment induced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, as well as the secretion of the T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL9. SCV2-RNA-stimulated MoDCs exhibited a mature form and triggered cocultured CD4 and CD8 T cells to produce IFN-γ, suggesting that SCV2-RNA can mediate DC activation. Similar results were observed in pDCs. SCV2-RNA induced the upregulation of CD86 expression and the production of IFN-α and TNF-α in pDCs. The authors suggested that such ssRNA-induced activation is mediated via the TLR8/MyD88/NF-κB pathway in MoDCs and by TLR7 in pDCs. Taken together, these results indicate that ssRNA and dsRNA produced by SARS-CoV-2 are recognized by endosomal RNA sensors. TLR9 recognizes CpG-rich DNA fragments derived from bacteria, viruses, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) [60] . While the relationship between TLR9 and the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 infection is not clear, the coding region of the E protein and ORF10 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome was shown to be enriched with CpG [73] . Recently, TLR9 was suspected of inducing severe COVID-19 [42] . This TLR9-COVID-19 hypothesis, presented by Bezemer and Garssen, proposes that CpG islands in SARS-CoV-2 or mtDNA released from damaged host cells could trigger TLR9 activation and subsequently elicit pathogenic hyperinflammatory responses. As it is still unclear whether TLR9 directly detects viral components derived from SARS-CoV-2, future studies are needed to address this issue. While it is well known that intracellular TLRs are physically separated from the cell surface to prevent autoimmune responses following receptor activation by host nucleic acids [74] , interestingly, several studies have suggested the cell surface positioning of endosomal TLRs in certain cell types [75] [76] [77] [78] . Cell surface expression of TLR3 was observed in human fibroblast cell lines [79] , mouse splenic CD8 + dendritic cells, and marginal zone B cells [80] . Mouse bone marrow (BM)-derived macrophages, BM-conventional dendritic cells, BM-plasmacytoid DCs and B cells expressed TLR7 on the cell surface [77] . TLR9 was expressed on the surface of mouse splenic DCs [78] , monocytes [81] , and human neutrophils [82] . These findings suggest that both the cell surface and intracellular expression of nucleic acid-sensing TLRs may participate in the activation of immune responses. Interestingly, human airway epithelial cells expressed TLR3, TLR7 and TLR9 on the apical cell membrane [76] , indicating that nucleic acid-sensing TLRs on the epithelial cell surface may play a crucial role in innate responses against inhaled pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. However, further studies are required to prove this hypothesis. TLRs participate in the first line of defense against invading pathogens. They recognize a broad range of PAMPs derived from microorganisms, and the main function of TLRs is the ability to activate innate immune responses, including cytokine production. At present, TLR2, TLR4, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 have been suggested as possible receptors capable of recognizing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Viral components including the S protein, E protein, ssRNA, and dsRNA seem to serve as ligands for these TLRs. TLRmediated immune responses are essential for host protection; however, uncontrolled and exacerbated inflammation can result in pathologic responses such as tissue damage. In patients with COVID-19, robust innate immune responses and hyperinflammation were observed in severe cases [3, 4, 7] , resulting in septic shock [83] , acute lung injury [84] , and acute respiratory distress syndrome [85] . Therefore, immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies, including the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, have been suggested as promising treatments for severe COVID-19. Many approaches targeting TLR signaling pathways have been tested for their ability to attenuate hyperinflammation following SARS-CoV-2 infection. For example, the U.S. FDA has approved an investigation into the efficacy of a PUL-042 inhalation solution that blocks TLR2/6/9 to reduce the infection rate, progression, and disease severity of COVID-19 (NCT04312997, NCT04313023) [42, 86] . Additionally, a clinical study to evaluate the inhibition of TLR3-mediated inflammatory responses by Famotidine [87] to improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19 has been conducted (NCT04389567, NCT04504240, NCT04724720, NCT04370262) [88, 89] . Various TLR4 modulators, such as EB05 (NCT04401475), Eritoran (NCT02735707), Naltrexone [90] (NCT04604704, NCT04604678), Curcumin [91] (NCT04382040), and Berberine [92] [93] [94] (NCT04479202) are undergoing clinical trials for COVID-19. Although current studies have not produced sufficient encouraging results, based on the evidence presented in this review, targeting TLRs could be an effective treatment for COVID-19. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China Re-analysis of Single Cell Transcriptome Reveals That the NR3C1-CXCL8-Neutrophil Axis Determines the Severity of COVID-19 The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19 An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival Impaired immune cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19 is IL-6 dependent Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Synergism of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma Triggers Inflammatory Cell Death, Tissue Damage, and Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cytokine Shock Syndromes The first pandemic of the 21st century Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus-The need for global proactive surveillance, sequencing and modeling A human coronavirus responsible for the common cold massively kills dendritic cells but not monocytes Genome Composition and Divergence of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Originating in China Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: A descriptive study Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel humanpathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein is dynamic, disordered, and phase separates with RNA Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein RNA binding domain reveals potential unique drug targeting sites Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2 Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy SARS-CoV-2 tropism, entry, replication, and propagation: Considerations for drug discovery and development SARS-CoV-2 infects cells after viral entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor Cathepsin L plays a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and humanized mice and is a promising target for new drug development Targeting TMPRSS2 and Cathepsin B/L together may be synergistic against SARS-CoV-2 infection SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Pathogenesis The coding capacity of SARS-CoV-2 Structure of replicating SARS-CoV-2 polymerase Correlative multi-scale cryo-imaging unveils SARS-CoV-2 assembly and egress Localization of SARS-CoV-2 Capping Enzymes Revealed by an Antibody against the nsp10 Subunit Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 Is an Interferon-Stimulated Gene in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Is Detected in Specific Cell Subsets across Tissues Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Single cell RNA sequencing of 13 human tissues identify cell types and receptors of human coronaviruses TLR2 senses the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein to produce inflammatory cytokines TLR3 and TLR7 RNA Sensor Activation during SARS-COV-2 Infection. Microorganisms 2021 A Multidisciplinary Theory of a Multifaceted Therapeutic Target SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages SARS-CoV-2-associated ssRNAs activate inflammation and immunity via TLR7/8 Cutting edge: Role of Toll-like receptor 1 in mediating immune response to microbial lipoproteins Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components Recognition of lipopeptide patterns by Toll-like receptor 2-Toll-like receptor 6 heterodimer Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3 Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: Mutations in Tlr4 gene Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G activates a specific antiviral Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway Involvement of toll-like receptor 4 in innate immunity to respiratory syncytial virus Pattern recognition receptors TLR4 and CD14 mediate response to respiratory syncytial virus The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5 Cutting edge: Bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression Recognition of singlestranded RNA viruses by Toll-like receptor 7 Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8 A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury Human TLR10 is a functional receptor, expressed by B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which activates gene transcription through MyD88 TLR10 Is a B Cell Intrinsic Suppressor of Adaptive Immune Responses Its Unique Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Potential Use as a Target in Therapeutics Toll-like Receptor 2 in Autoimmune Inflammation. Immune Netw. 2021, 21, e18 Toll-like receptor signaling pathways The Role of TLR2 in Infection and Immunity SARS-CoV-2 takes its Toll SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-kappaB pathway In silico studies on the comparative characterization of the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein with ACE-2 receptor homologs and human TLRs COVID-19 Patients Upregulate Toll-like Receptor 4-mediated Inflammatory Signaling That Mimics Bacterial Sepsis SARS-CoV-2 induces double-stranded RNA-mediated innate immune responses in respiratory epithelial-derived cells and cardiomyocytes Extraordinary GU-rich single-strand RNA identified from SARS coronavirus contributes an excessive innate immune response. Microbes Infect Intra-genome variability in the dinucleotide composition of SARS-CoV-2. Virus Evol. 2020, 6, veaa057 Intracellular toll-like receptors Cell Surface Expression of Endosomal Toll-Like Receptors-A Necessity or a Superfluous Duplication? Front Toll-like receptor expression and induction of type I and type III interferons in primary airway epithelial cells Targeting cell surface TLR7 for therapeutic intervention in autoimmune diseases An essential role for the N-terminal fragment of Toll-like receptor 9 in DNA sensing Establishment of a monoclonal antibody against human Toll-like receptor 3 that blocks double-stranded RNA-mediated signaling Roles of the cleaved N-terminal TLR3 fragment and cell surface TLR3 in double-stranded RNA sensing The protective effect of the anti-Toll-like receptor 9 antibody against acute cytokine storm caused by immunostimulatory Primary blood neutrophils express a functional cell surface Toll-like receptor 9 Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 disease by controlled modulation of innate immunity Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection The Efficacy of Famotidine in improvement of outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial COVID-19: Famotidine, Histamine, Mast Cells, and Mechanisms Pharmacological characterization of the opioid inactive isomers (+)-naltrexone and (+)-naloxone as antagonists of toll-like receptor 4 Inhibition of homodimerization of Toll-like receptor 4 by curcumin Berberine and Obatoclax Inhibit SARS-Cov-2 Replication in Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cells In Vitro Berberine reduces circulating inflammatory mediators in patients with severe COVID-19 Role of berberine in anti-bacterial as a high-affinity LPS antagonist binding to TLR4/MD-2 receptor The authors would like to thank the members of the Laboratory of Host Defenses for helpful advice. The authors declare no conflict of interest.