key: cord-0750385-qo8patdv
authors: Facio, Fernando Nestor; Nagle Spessoto, Ana Clara; Warick Facio, Maria Fernanda; Fava Spessoto, Luís Cesar
title: Impact of the Pandemic on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Urological Tumors at a University Hospital
date: 2022-01-18
journal: Cureus
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21357
sha: 612ba37f54b406a56eafaf40f8a0fab682ae6333
doc_id: 750385
cord_uid: qo8patdv

Background The rapid dissemination of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) had dramatic effects on individuals and healthcare systems in 2020. At our tertiary hospital, surgeries were recommended for patients at high oncological risk, with the prioritization of the maintenance of care and treatment of cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors under the care of a university hospital. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was performed of the charts of patients with urological tumors (prostate, kidney, bladder, and testicle) under the care and treated surgically at the Hospital de Base in 2019 and 2020, independently of ethnicity. The results were compared by the chi-square test (with a significance level of 5%). Results A discrete increase occurred in the quantity of appointments in 2020 (n = 5,846) compared to 2019 (n = 5,726). The most frequent types of cancer in 2019 and 2020 were, respectively, prostate (70.97% and 73.37%), bladder (18.07% and 12.52%), kidney (7.96% and 8%), and testicle (29.24% and 70.76%). Analyzing 279 surgeries performed on patients with prostate tumors, a 12.7% increase occurred in the year of the pandemic. Analyzing 271 surgical procedures on patients with bladder cancer, no considerable change occurred. Conclusion The analysis of the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors at a university hospital revealed a discrete increase in the number of outpatient appointments and a slight reduction in the number of patients and surgical procedures in the year of the pandemic (2020). More surgical procedures were conducted on patients with prostate cancer in 2020. More patients with bladder cancer sought medical care in the year of the pandemic, and practically the same quantity was submitted for surgical treatment. There was no statistically significant difference among types of cancer.

The disease, denominated coronavirus 2019 in Wuhan, China [1] , spread quickly to other regions of the country and around the world [2, 3] . This pandemic has had implications regarding the continuity of the treatment of patients, especially oncological patients. A change in priority occurred, with human, medical, and paramedical resources being directed at the care of patients infected with COVID-19. Moreover, measures to confine the population have led to restrictions on travel for appointments, examinations, and treatment (clinical and surgical).

Patients with cancer are considered immunocompromised due to the nature of the disease as well as the treatment to which they are submitted (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery). Considering the more advanced age, the impossibility of receiving adequate medical care, and the fact that patients with cancer have a 3.5-fold greater risk of developing severe events related to COVID-19, all elective surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy procedures in stable patients should be postponed [4] [5] [6] . The decision to postpone clinical appointments or oncological surgeries currently depends on the capacity of the hospital in 1 2 3 1 terms of infrastructure and the support necessary for these types of procedures [7] .

In this context, the majority of urological medical centers must prioritize surgical procedures for oncological patients, applying restrictions to elective non-oncological procedures with the aim of optimizing health resources and minimizing the risk of hospital infection [8] . At our tertiary hospital, surgeries were recommended for patients at high oncological risk, prioritizing the maintenance of care and treatment for these patients.

Considering the changes to the care of oncological patients caused by the pandemic, an investigation is warranted into the impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors at the secondlargest hospital complex in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Theoretically, a reduction would be expected in the quantity of appointments and surgical procedures for these patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors at a university hospital in terms of the number of outpatient appointments with a diagnosis of urological tumors and the quantity of surgical procedures performed on patients with urological tumors.

A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted involving the analysis of the charts of patients with urological tumors (prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicle) at the Hospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil, independently of ethnicity. The period study was 2019 and 2020 (pandemic). This study received approval from the institutional review board (certificate number: 44639621.0.0000.5415).

The inclusion criterion was a diagnosis of urological tumors in 2019 and 2020 (pandemic) in pediatric and adult patients who may have undergone surgical treatment in the period. The exclusion criterion was a diagnosis in the period prior to 2019.

An analysis was conducted on the quantity of outpatient appointments for patients with a diagnosis of urological tumors, the quantity of surgical procedures performed on these patients, and the possible association between the patients diagnosed and the respective surgical treatment. All the data used in this study were from the institutional computational system.

Data analysis involved the calculation of relative frequencies using Microsoft Office Excel® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA). The results were compared by the chi-square test (with a significance level of 5%).

A discrete increase occurred in the quantity of appointments in 2020 (n = 5,846) compared to 2019 (n = 5,726). The most frequent types of cancer in 2019 and 2020 were, respectively, prostate (70.97% and 73.37%), bladder (18.07% and 12.52%), kidney (7.96% and 8%), and testicle (29.24% and 70.76%) ( A discrete reduction, not significant, occurred in the quantity of patients with a diagnosis of urological tumors at the university hospital in 2020 (n = 421) compared to 2019 (n = 447). In the year of the pandemic, a reduction occurred in the number of patients with prostate, kidney, and testicular tumors, whereas an increase occurred in the number of patients with bladder cancer ( The quantity of patients with a diagnosis of urological tumors and surgical procedures on these patients is expressed in Table 4 . 

The analysis of the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors at a university hospital revealed a discrete increase in the quantity of outpatient appointments and a slight reduction in the quantity of patients and surgical procedures in the year of the pandemic (2020). Regarding the organs affected, a reduction occurred in the quantity of patients with prostate cancer who sought treatment, but more surgical procedures were performed on these patients in 2020. More patients with bladder cancer sought treatment in the year of the pandemic, and practically the same quantity was submitted for surgical treatment. For kidney and testicular tumors, reductions occurred in both the demand for hospital care and the quantity of surgeries.

Exposure to possibly contaminated environments, such as medical centers, was expected to lead to a possible absence of patients during the current pandemic. However, only a slight decrease was found in the present study regarding the quantity of patients who sought hospital care for urological treatment and the number of surgical procedures performed. This may be related to the fact that care was not suspended in the period, as patients with urological tumors should receive care to ensure the earliest possible diagnosis and treatment.

A 12.7% increase occurred in the quantity of surgeries performed on patients with prostate tumors in the year of the pandemic. Early treatment in such cases is of the utmost importance, as 15,983 deaths due to prostate cancer occurred in Brazil in 2019 [9] . Moreover, there are no symptoms in the initial stages of this disease. Due to the reduction in the quantity of elective surgeries, oncological surgical interventions, including cases of prostate cancer, were considered a priority, which may explain the increase in the number of these procedures during the pandemic.

Analyzing patients with bladder cancer, no change occurred in the quantity of surgeries in the year of the pandemic. In such cases, patients have clinical conditions that hasten the prompt search for medical care, such as hematuria, clot formation, and urinary retention.

A reduction occurred in the quantity of surgical procedures on patients with kidney and testicular tumors during the pandemic. Patients with these tumors generally have few symptoms to justify the search for urgent medical care.

In times of crisis, uro-oncological surgeries should be concentrated at tertiary urology centers, which should ideally remain COVID-19-free environments to ensure high-complexity treatment for oncological patients. The adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on urological health care will certainly include significant harm due to the postponement of oncological therapy, including surgeries [10] .

Despite the pandemic, the authors believe that uro-oncological patients must have close follow-up because some neoplasias, such as prostate cancer, could disseminate metastatic with a poor prognosis.

This work is based on a retrospective study performed at a single medical center. Moreover, urological tumors less frequently, such as penile tumors, were excluded. Therefore, long-term and multi-centric studies are necessary to confirm our results.

In the present study, the analysis of the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with urological tumors at a university hospital revealed a discrete increase in the quantity of outpatient appointments as well as a slight reduction in the quantity of patients and surgical procedures in the year of the pandemic (2020). More surgical procedures were conducted on patients with prostate cancer in 2020. More patients with bladder cancer sought medical care in the year of the pandemic, and practically the same quantity was submitted for surgical treatment.

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China

First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States

First imported case of 2019 novel coronavirus in Canada, presenting as mild pneumonia

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection

Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China

COVID-19 and urology: a comprehensive review of the literature

Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

Assessing the burden of nondeferrable major uro-oncologic surgery to guide prioritization strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from three Italian highvolume referral centres

Estimativas para o ano 2020 de número de casos novos de câncer

The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on uro-oncological practice across Europe: which burden of activity are we facing ahead?

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP) issued approval 44639621.0.0000.5415. This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP) (certificate number: 44639621.0.0000.5415). Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.