key: cord-0746174-69cxd255
authors: Fargeot, G.; Périllaud-Dubois, C.; Deback, C.; Noël, N.; Adam, C.; Cauquil, C.; Echaniz-Laguna, A.
title: Parvovirus B19-related peripheral nerve necrotizing vasculitis following SARS-CoV-2 infection
date: 2021-08-09
journal: Rev Neurol (Paris)
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.013
sha: 8250ce8c3b0031dbcbf2738665ae287c6c2dc039
doc_id: 746174
cord_uid: 69cxd255

nan

Letter to the editor Parvovirus B19-related peripheral nerve necrotizing vasculitis following SARS-CoV-2 infection A 39-year-old nurse with no past medical history developed ageusia and anosmia during the COVID-19 epidemic. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in a nasopharyngeal swab, and symptoms spontaneously resolved in a few days. Six weeks later, she developed bilateral wrist and ankle pain, and a necrotic purpuric rash involving limbs and trunk. One week after, she developed successively over one week numbness and neuropathic pain in the right hand, left hand and feet, followed by right hand and right foot weakness. Physical examination showed severe weakness of intrinsic muscles and abductor pollicis brevis of the right hand and right ankle dorsiflexors. Electrodiagnostic evaluation demonstrated multiple mononeuropathy. Total blood count, CRP, fibrinogen, complement levels and protein electrophoresis were normal. Antinuclear and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, cryoglobulin, hepatitis B and C viruses, HIV, and Lyme disease were not found. SARS-CoV-2 IgG, PVB19 IgG and Epstein-Barr virus IgG antibodies were found in serum, and IgM antibodies were negative for all three viruses. Biopsy of the superficial fibular nerve revealed small-to-mediumsized vessel vasculitis with epineural vessel wall fibrinoid necrosis (Fig. 1A) . Skin biopsy showed small-vessel vasculitis with capillary wall fibrinoid necrosis and perivascular C3 deposits (Fig. 1B) . The patient was diagnosed with nerve and skin necrotizing vasculitis, and treated with oral corticosteroids 1 mg/kg/day. Neurological status remained unchanged after 4 weeks. Both SARS-CoV-2-and PVB19-related vasculitis were considered, and viral load of both viruses was analyzed in blood, skin and nerve using real-time PCR. PVB19 viral DNA load was estimated at 3650, 21,467, and 1,150,000 copies per one million cells (copies/Mc) in blood, skin and nerve respectively whereas SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load was undetectable in all 3 tissues (Fig. 1C) . As a result, PVB19-related peripheral nerve vasculitis was considered, and the patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) at the dose of 2 g/kg, which allowed dramatic clinical improvement with only residual feet paresthesia six months later.

Viruses may provoke peripheral nerve vasculitis, either by a direct cytopathic or an indirect autoimmune response [1] . Skin and nerve vasculitis has been reported in association with acute PVB19 infection, and systemic necrotizing vasculitis has been observed in association with chronic PVB19 infection, with good IVIg-responsiveness [2, 3] . Skin vasculitis has been described in association with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection [4] . In our case, vasculitis may have been the result of PVB19 infection, SARS-CoV-2 infection, or both. To untie the knot, we performed viral load analysis in blood, skin and nerve, and observed an absence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in all samples, and a high PVB19 DNA load in blood, skin and nerve. The much higher PVB19 DNA load in the nerve of our patient in comparison with blood argues against passive blood contamination and suggests that PVB19 is very likely present in peripheral nerve. In addition, although EBV DNA was found in blood, it was not found in skin and nerve (Fig. 1C) , supporting the absence of blood contamination in our nerve sample. Interestingly, it has been shown that PVB19 DNA may persist in tissues and induce pro-inflammatory changes, even in a non-proliferative state [5] . In our patient, weak corticosteroids response and dramatic IVIg response were also in favor of PVB19-related vasculitis [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] . Interestingly, vasculitis appeared shortly after SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting SARS-CoV-2 may have triggered PVB19-related vasculitis. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that infection with viruses such as Adenovirus and Human Herpesvirus-6, can stimulate PVB19 capsid gene expression and lead to PVB19 replication in endothelial cells [6] . To summarize, this case demonstrates that peripheral nerve viral load analysis is a useful tool for the diagnosis of viral-linked vasculitis. In our patient, this technique allowed us to demonstrate the likely causative role of chronic PVB19 infection and ruled out SARS-CoV-2 direct implication.

The authors declare that they have no competing interest. r e f e r e n c e s

revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides

Chronic parvovirus B19 infection and systemic necrotising vasculitis: opportunistic infection or aetiological agent?

Mononeuropathy multiplex associated with acute parvovirus B19 infection: Characteristics, treatment and outcome

COVID-19 vasculitis and novel vasculitis mimics

Recent advances in replication and infection of human parvovirus B19

Antibody-Mediated Enhancement of Parvovirus B19 Uptake into Endothelial Cells Mediated by a Receptor for Complement Factor C1q

Noë l d,e C. Adam h C. Cauquil a,f A. Echaniz-Laguna a,d,f,g a Neurology Department

SARS-CoV-2 ARN was not found in blood, skin and nerve. EBV viral load was only found in blood.