key: cord-0740432-wzwjar61
authors: Nistri, Riccardo; Barbuti, Elena; Rinaldi, Virginia; Tufano, Laura; Pozzilli, Valeria; Ianniello, Antonio; Marinelli, Fabiana; De Luca, Giovanna; Prosperini, Luca; Tomassini, Valentina; Pozzilli, Carlo
title: Case Report: Multiple Sclerosis Relapses After Vaccination Against SARS-CoV2: A Series of Clinical Cases
date: 2021-10-22
journal: Front Neurol
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.765954
sha: 4bcf3d8abd8ec5f53c87e376500a0a02e8ef6347
doc_id: 740432
cord_uid: wzwjar61

Objective: To describe a temporal association between COVID-19 vaccine administration and multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Methods: This case series study was collected in four MS Centres in Central Italy, using data from 16 MS patients who received COVID-19 vaccination and presented both clinically and radiologically confirmed relapses between March and June 2021. We collected patients' relevant medical history, including demographics, MS clinical course, disease-modifying treatment (DMT) received (if applicable), and data from MRI scans obtained after the COVID-19 vaccination. Results: Three out of 16 patients received a diagnosis of MS with a first episode occurring after COVID-19 vaccination; 13 had already a diagnosis of MS and, among them, 9 were on treatment with DMTs. Ten patients received BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech, 2 patients mRNA-1273/Moderna, and 4 patients ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AstraZeneca. All MS relapses occurred from 3 days to 3 weeks after receiving the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccination or the booster. All patients had evidence of radiological activity on MRI. Discussion: Clinical and radiological findings in these cohort of MS patients confirmed disease re/activation and suggested a temporal association between disease activity and COVID-19 vaccination. The nature of this temporal association, whether causative or incidental, remains to be established.

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased risk of respiratory infections, especially patients presenting severe disability and on disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) (1) . Infections can trigger MS relapses (2) , and thus, vaccination in MS patients should be pursued as a general policy in order to reduce the risk of infections (3) . Despite the long-standing debate over an increased risk of relapse occurrence after vaccination, the existence of this phenomenon has not been confirmed (4) .

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic led to an unprecedented vaccination campaign that included MS patients. In Italy, two types of vaccines were available: (i) mRNA-vaccines (BNT162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech and mRNA-1273 Moderna) (5); (ii) adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChsdOx1 nCoV-19, AZD12222, AstraZeneca) (6) .

Here, we describe 16 cases of clinically and radiologically confirmed MS re/activation that occurred after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in MS patients regularly followed in four MS Centres in Central Italy from March to June 2021 ( Table 1) .

A 45-year-old man received a diagnosis of MS (7) in 2012 and was started on teriflunomide and then from April 2020 with Figure 1A ).

A 48-year-old woman received on March 5 her first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. 8 days later, she developed visual acuity deficit from her right eye. She underwent MRI scan on March 31, where an enhancing lesion in the corpus callosum, multiple white matter unenhanced lesions, and lesions in the occipital lobe were detected ( Figure 1B) . Diagnosis of MS was made, and she was treated with high dose of intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), with marked improvement of the visual deficit.

A 54-year-old woman was diagnosed with MS in 1993. She remained clinically stable without any therapy up to 2021. On Figure 1C) . She was treated with IVMP with complete recovery.

A 66-year-old woman received the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 on April 11, 2021 and, 1 week later, complained visual disturbance and postural instability on the right limbs. A brain MRI on May 4 showed multiple white matter lesions, four of them enhancing in the left paratrigonal and periventricular white matter ( Figure 1D ). Her CSF showed oligoclonal bands. Diagnosis of MS (7) was made, and she was treated with IVMP with partial improvement.

In she received the booster, and after 3 days, her follow-up MRI showed an enhancing brain lesion in the right corona radiata ( Figure 1E ).

A 57-year-old man had a diagnosis of MS in 2001. He was treated initially with injectables, then with teriflunomide, and, in 2015, with mitoxantrone. Since then, he remained clinically and radiologically stable without any treatment. On May 11, 2021, he received the booster of mRNA-1273 vaccine. Two weeks later, he experienced a severe motor deficit in both legs that made him bed bound. He was admitted to hospital where he underwent an MRI on June 7, 2021, showing an enhancing pontine lesion ( Figure 1F) . He was treated with IVMP with only partial recovery.

A 49-year-old woman was diagnosed with MS in November 2013. She has been on treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) since July 2014, with clinical and radiological stability. On April 1, 2021, she underwent a brain and spinal cord MRI scan, which was stable. On April 8, she received her first BNT162b2 dose of vaccine. Five days after, she developed numbness on the left hand and left side of her head. On April 20, she underwent a new scan, which detected a periventricular lesion and a spinal lesion at C3 level, both enhancing ( Figure 1G) . She was treated with IVMP with almost complete recovery.

In 2014, after the onset of hypoesthesia on his left side, a 39year-old man underwent an MRI scan, which showed multiple lesions on brain and spinal cord. He started treatment with injectables switched to DMF in 2017. After almost 3 years of clinical and radiological stability, on April 27, 2021, he received his first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, followed, 10 days later, by the onset of paraesthesia on his left leg. He underwent an MRI scan on May 13 that showed three new lesions, two of which were enhancing in the left parietal lobe and in the periventricular white matter (Figure 1H) . He was treated with oral steroids with partial recovery.

A 39-year-old woman suffered from her first clinical episode in August 2019 with a complete recovery. A diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome was made, and she was monitored by serial MRI that confirmed a radiological stability up to January 2021. On April 29, she received her first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine followed, 3 days later, by dysesthesia on her right hand and foot. A scan performed on May 11, 2021 showed a new enhancing lesion in the mesencephalon (Figure 1I) . She was treated with IV methylprednisolone with a good recovery. A diagnosis of MS was made, and a DMT was planned.

A 60-year-old female patient received a diagnosis of MS in 1998. In 2001, she started treatment with injectables switched to DMF in 2015. She was clinically and radiologically stable for 6 years. In April 2021, she performed the first BNT162b2 dose of vaccine presenting few days later with fatigue and numbness in both legs. A scan was performed, and one enhancing brain lesion was detected in the left periventricular white matter ( Figure 1L ).

A 30-year-old woman was diagnosed with MS in 2018, after a clinical onset with optic neuritis and MRI suggestive of dissemination in space and time. She was treated with DMF between September 2018 and August 2020 and then she started Cladribine. A baseline MRI at the end of October 2020 was stable. She received the BNT162b2 booster on April 8, 2021. Twenty days later, she complained of a language disturbance. A brain MRI performed on June 3, 2021 revealed the presence of two enhancing brain lesions, one in the right corona radiata and one with conspicuous oedema in the left centrum semiovale ( Figure 1M ).

A (Figure 1N) . She started IVMP with benefit.

A Figure 1O ).

A 35-year-old woman received a diagnosis of MS in the 2005. She was treated with injectables, and in February 2019, she started DMF. She remained clinically and radiologically stable until May 24, 2021, when she received the BNT162b2 booster. The day after the vaccination, she developed paraesthesia on the left side of the body. She underwent a scan 13 days later, which showed three enhancing lesions in the left temporal lobe and left centrum semiovale ( Figure 1P ).

A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with MS in 2003. He was treated with injectables and switched to teriflunomide in November 2020. He was clinically stable and without new lesions on MRI performed on February 25, 2021. On April 7, 2021, 1 week after the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (March 31, 2021), he developed a right hemiparesis. A brain scan showed two ring-enhancing lesions located in the left periventricular white matter ( Figure 1Q) . IVMP was administered with full recovery. He received the BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech booster on May 11, 2021. without any further medical problem.

A 37-year-old man was diagnosed with MS in 2019. In April 2020, he started DMF with clinical stability. On June 4, 2021, he had the BNT162b2 booster. On June 15, the patient presented with weakness on his right limbs. On June 24, he underwent a brain MRI that, compared with a previous routine scan of May 20, 2021 , showed a new tumefactive contrast-enhancing lesion in the left fronto-parietal white matter (Figure 1R) . The patient was treated with IVMP with partial recovery.

There have been few cases reported of neurological complications associated with COVID-19 vaccination. These include cases of transverse myelitis (8), of Bell's palsy (9) , of unusual variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome, and of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (10, 11) . In MS, there are suggestions of an unchanged rate of relapse in vaccinated, when compared to nonvaccinated, patients following the vaccination (12) . However, this latter finding has not been supported by radiological evidence of disease activity and the period of observation was limited.

Only two cases of acute relapse after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported so far (13, 14) , both having a good outcome.

Here, we describe a series of 16 patients with MS relapses occurring from 3 days to 3 weeks after their COVID-19 vaccination, between March and June 2021. During this period, at least 2500 patients with MS accessed the four MS Centres. During this period, a total of 69 verified (i.e., treated with high dose IV steroids) relapses were observed in the Centers, while 52 relapses were measured in the preceding 4 months. Although seasonal variation in relapse rate associated with monthly hours of sunshine should be taken into account (15) , an increase in the total number of relapses was observed during the SARS-COV-2 vaccination campaign.

Out of 16 cases, 3 received a diagnosis of MS after COVID-19 vaccination; the remaining 13 had already a diagnosis of MS made from few months to several years before the vaccine administration. Nine patients were on DMTs; four patients were no longer on DMTs, although they had used them in the past, and were clinically and radiologically stable. Disease reactivation is reported after both the first vaccine administration (n = 10) and the booster (n = 6). All patients had evidence of radiological activity on MRI to support the relapse diagnosis. Age, sex, and level of disability reflect what may be expected for a relapsing MS cohort. The characteristics of the enhancing lesions varied from small to large lesions, in both the brain and the spinal cord.

The role of vaccines on the risk of developing MS and MS relapses remains to be elucidated, with no sufficient data to support or refute an association between the development of MS and the antiviral vaccinations (16, 17) . Therefore, currently, there are no contraindications for vaccination in patients with MS, with the only exception regarding live-attenuated vaccines that are contraindicated for MS patients who receive immunosuppressive or immunomodulating treatments. Unless the risk of infection outweighs the risk of adverse reactions induced by the vaccine, MS relapses are not a contraindication for vaccination, but they are a reason to delay vaccination until remission (17) .

Although the evidence of an association between vaccination and MS activity is still debated (18) , a link between them has been suggested, within the first 30 days after immunization, given the possibility of vaccines to accelerate the transition from subclinical to clinical disease through a stimulation of the immune system (19) . In a previous case series, we have looked into the safety of receiving the influenza vaccine in MS patients by clinical and MRI studies, adding a note of caution in those subjects with evidence of recent disease activity (20) .

The exact mechanisms through which autoimmune reactions can be triggered by vaccination are not fully understood, although they probably vary according to the type of vaccine and individual genetic susceptibility (21, 22) .

Immunological studies have shown that coordinated interactions between T and B lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system are necessary for the successful generation of immunological memory and the production of neutralizing antibodies following recognition of antigens by the innate immune cells (3) . However, the T/B cell interaction may be altered in MS even in the absence of DMTs (23, 24) . In addition, new technologies currently used for mounting an immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine, such as mRNA vaccines, have not been tested in populations suffering from autoimmune conditions before the vaccination campaign.

Although the clinical cases described here experienced neurological symptoms that were temporally associated with administration of the vaccine, causality cannot be assumed. Indeed, it cannot be disentangled whether radiologically confirmed relapses occurring after vaccination are triggered by the vaccination-induced inflammatory state or are relapses that would have happened anyway, independently from vaccination.

After the authorization of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in Italy, MS patients were prioritized for vaccination starting in March 2021. The availability of COVID-19 vaccines met the willingness of approximately 80% of European MS patients to receive vaccination (ref). The greatest interest in vaccination was observed in older patients and in those with comorbidities (25) . This evidence is reflected in our case series, where mean age was 46.7 ± 10.3 and median EDSS score was 2.5. Immunosenescence increases the risk of adverse events in older adults. Beyond reduced response to vaccines, changes that take place in the immune system with aging generally result in higher susceptibility to infections and prevalence of autoimmunity (26) , factors that can precipitate reactivations in MS patients. During mass immunization campaign, such as that occurred in France between 1995 and 1997, several cases of MS were reported a few weeks after HBV vaccination, suggesting that vaccine may accelerate the transition from subclinical to clinical disease (27) . However, two subsequent case-control studies showed a nonsignificant increase in risk of developing MS following the HBV vaccine (ref). Therefore, conclusions derived from case reports and case series are not free from biases and should not influence vaccine hesitancy (28) .

Adverse events of vaccination can occur in rare cases, but benefits generally outweigh adverse effects, given that acute infections may have dangerous consequences (29) . Indeed, patients with MS have an increased mortality risk from COVID-19, especially if older and with significant disability and/or comorbidities (30) .

The elevated number of MS patients with relapse after COVID-19 vaccine coming to our observation during a relative short period of time suggests the need for robust post-vaccination surveillance in patients with MS. Large prospective controlled studies are required to estimate the frequency of MS relapses, both clinically and MRI proved, which might occur during the post-vaccine period when a new COVID-19 vaccination program will be planned.

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Infections in patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: a multi-database study

Immunization in patients with multiple sclerosis

Vaccine considerations for multiple sclerosis in the COVID-19 Era

Vaccines and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies

Intranasal vaccination of recombinant adeno-associated virus encoding receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike protein induces strong mucosal immune responses and provides long-term protection against SARS-CoV infection

Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine efficacy

ANA investigates: neurological complications of COVID-19 vaccines

Guillain-Barré syndrome variant occurring after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

AstraZeneca's COVID-19 Vaccine: EMA Finds Possible Link to Very Rare Cases of Unusual Blood Clots With Low Blood Platelets (2021)

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis: what we have learnt by

Acute relapse and poor immunization following COVID-19 vaccination in a rituximabtreated multiple sclerosis patient

Severe multiple sclerosis relapse after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report

Seasonal variation in multiple sclerosis relapse

Immunization and multiple sclerosis: recommendations from the French multiple sclerosis society

Practice guideline update summary: vaccine-preventable infections and immunization in multiple sclerosis: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the american academy of neurology

Vaccination in multiple sclerosis: friend or foe? Front Immunol

Vaccines and the risk of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system demyelinating diseases

Clinical and MRI assessment of disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis after influenza vaccination

Infections and autoimmunity: Friends or foes?

Epidemiology of autoimmune reactions induced by vaccination

B cells in multiple sclerosis

T-Cells in Multiple Sclerosis

Willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19: an exploratory online survey in a Portuguese cohort of multiple sclerosis patients

Immunosenescence in multiple sclerosis: the identification of new therapeutic targets

Hepatitis B vaccination and the risk of multiple sclerosis

Vaccine hesitancy in patients with multiple sclerosis: preparing for SARS-Cov 2 vaccination challenge

Vaccination in multiple sclerosis -challenging practices (Review)

COVID-19 among patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

CP and RN wrote the manuscript with support from EB, AI, LT, FM, LP, GD, VP, and VT. CP and VR conceived of the presented idea. All authors have collected the data.Conflict of Interest: FM has received consulting fees, speaker honoraria, and/or travel grants from Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, and Roche; GD served on scientific advisory boards for Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Roche, and has received travel and/or speaker honoraria from Merck, Roche, Teva, Biogen, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. LP has received consulting fees from Celgene, Biogen, and Novartis; speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Teva; research grants from the Italian MS Society (Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla) and Genzyme. VT has received consulting fees and/or travel grants and/or research grants from Bristol Myer Squibb, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Roche; research grants from the Italian MS Society (Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla) and the MS Society UK, and from the Italian Ministry of Health. CP has served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Genzyme, Teva, and Actelion; received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme, Actelion, and Novartis; received research support from Biogen, Teva, Novartis, and Genzyme.The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.Publisher's Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.Copyright © 2021 Nistri, Barbuti, Rinaldi, Tufano, Pozzilli, Ianniello, Marinelli, De Luca, Prosperini, Tomassini and Pozzilli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.