key: cord-0739439-jnkw29aq
authors: Bangwal, Deepak; Suyal, Jyotsana; Kumar, Rupesh
title: Hotel building design, occupants’ health and performance in response to COVID 19
date: 2022-04-05
journal: Int J Hosp Manag
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103212
sha: d704b748a5493f6918077803861f12d2464db404
doc_id: 739439
cord_uid: jnkw29aq

In the COVID-19 pandemic, the employee realized the importance of a healthy workplace. A healthy workplace provides natural protection against respiratory disease and reduces exposure to viruses. Therefore, the current COVID-19 pandemic should be a wake-up call to understand the importance of building design and a dress rehearsal for future challenges because building-based prevention and control measures have become one of the most significant ways of fighting against the epidemic. This study investigates the role of hotel building design in employee health and performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study covered the LEED-certified hotel building in India. The formulated Hypothesis was tested empirically by the structural equation modeling (SEM) for determining the potential of the hotel building design. It was obtained from the study that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the hotel building design of the hospitality industry had a more significant influence on employee performance, followed by employee health.

In India, the hospitality industry was growing faster than the economy and expected 492.21 billion U.S. Dollar contributions in India's GDP in 2028. As of 2019, the hospitality industry created 4.2 crore jobs in India which were 8.1% of total employment in the country. However, this one epidemic has changed the whole scenario. The COVID-19 poses a significant threat to India's travel and tourism industry (Confederation of Indian Industry, 2020; Kaushal and Srivastava, 2021) . Due to COVID-19, there is a severe drop in domestic and international travelers. The hospitality industry is currently operating at 10-15 % occupancy. As a result, a cumulative drop of 30-50 % in income per available room throughout the financial year 2022 and a loss of 14.5 million jobs in the Indian hospitality industry are reported (IANS, 2020; UNWTO, 2020) .

The COVID-19 virus can spread readily and cause severe disease to people with existing health problems (Yu et al., 2021; Aguiar-Quintana et al., 2021; Sönmez et al., 2020; Torales et al., 2020; Guan et al., 2020 and Guo et al., 2020) . COVID-19 affects the individual's mental health (e.g., mental depression and stress) and physical health (e.g., asthma and other respiratory problems). Every country is trying hard to find a treatment for COVID-19, but no one can now succeed. The only source is to find alternative strategies and prevention methods to control the spreading of the virus. As the hospitality sector gradually recovering, the COVID-19 crisis continues to have a profound impact on how hospitality businesses function (Rivera, 2020) . The hospitality industry needs to make significant changes to its workplace and operations in the COVID-19 business environment to ensure employee health and performance (Gursoy and Chi, 2020; Yu et al., 2020; Gössling et al., 2020) . The hospitality industry is expected to shift its focus to develop healthy and safe building designs to prevent the COVID-19 virus and any other upcoming pandemics for the sustainable growth of the hospitality industry. Now slowly, the situation has become controllable, but still, people are scared to join their workplace (Gralinski and Menachery, 2020) . Fear of COVID-19 will likely cause significant concern among hospitality employees about being exposed to an infected customer or colleague at the workplace. One of the challenges is maintaining social distance while at work.

Because hospitality employees have been identified as a high-risk group for coronavirus infection as they must continue to interact with guests and colleagues face-to-face (Chen et al, 2022; Sinclair et al., 2021; Alonso et al., 2020) . For this hotel building design plays a significant role against the spreading of the novel coronavirus due to its features of providing fresh air, natural light to enhance the immunity and ability to resist viruses, best ventilation system, new touchless technologies, controllable thermal settings, layout, size, healthy and safe workplace for maintaining social distancing (Kaklauskas et al., 2021; Bangwal, 2019b) . These building features help to reduce the impacts of the virus on human health (Pinheiro and Luís, 2020) . In a few studies, the employee reported fewer sick building syndrome symptoms, fewer respiratory symptoms, less absenteeism, fewer turnover, and better physical and mental health Bangwal, 2019b; Allen et al., 2015) . Unhealthy employees find it challenging to employ their creativity (Dunnagan et al., 2001) and are more likely to exhibit reduced work effectiveness (Gilmour and Patten, 2007; Jung and Yoon, 2018; Ram, 2018) . In addition, it will J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f cause absenteeism, low performance (Blackmore et al., 2007) , which yields significant expenditure to the organization (Villanueva and Djurkovic, 2009 ).

Buildings design helps to minimize the impacts of COVID-19 on employee health and performance by decreasing the risk of contagion and preventing cross-infection. Because, if the hotel building can control the spreading of the virus, it provides mental relief to the employee, which further directly related his performance . It means buildings design, directly and indirectly, influences employee mental and physical health, directly by providing enhanced indoor environments at the individual level and indirectly by reducing the risk of getting the disease and enhancing the ability to resist viruses Bangwal, 2019b; Dodo, 2020; Yudelson, 2008) . Therefore, it is strategically vital for the hospitality organization to recognize hotel building design role in reducing the risk of disease transmission that may further affect employee mental health, physical health, and performance level. If yes, then what are the actions of linking? Numerous studies demonstrated the correlations between building design, occupant's health, satisfaction, and productivity (Awada et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2019; Samet and Spengler, 2003; Bangwal, 2019b) . However, it shall be stated that this type of relationship has not yet been tested to solidly the effect of LEED-certified hotel building design on individual hospitality employee performance through the mediating role of mental and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, this study may help to amplify the knowledge about the -mediating effect‖ that hotel building design may have through mental and physical health on employee self-rated performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. By using the job demands-resources (JD-R) model Demerouti, 2014, 2017; Demerouti et al., 2001 ) and its recent variant, the environmental demands-resources (ED-R) model (Roskams and Haynes, 2020) , we propose the relationship, which found impacts on an objective measure of health and employee self-rated performance-from exposure to three LEED-certified buildings.

The building design, self-reported health, and performance of 302 participants in LEED-certified hotel buildings were tracked over the period of six months in India.

This paper aims to fill the research gap by identifying how hotel building design features can facilitate the mental & physical health and performance level of hotel employees in the outbreak situation of COVID 19 and contributes to the ongoing research about the role of the physical environment and its responses. Therefore, the outcome of this study provides valuable J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f suggestions on how hotel business owners, policymakers and operators can reduce health issues in the workplace and subsequently improve employee performance. Although many policies related to building design have emerged, it still requires to be further enhanced to reduce the risk of other health issues and epidemic.

Today the world is facing a COVID-19 pandemic, and it may stay with us for years to come.

Therefore, this will again bring the concept of building design in order to reduce the risk of coronavirus and other health issues not only today but also for a future outbreak. Furthermore, as COVID-19 spreads readily through social gathering, smaller airborne droplet nuclei take different shapes, and building design is one of the prevention steps to control (Dietz et al., 2020; Pinheiro and Luís, 2020; Larsson, 2020) . Thus, the concept of ‗servicescape' is also used to enlighten the man-made physical environment in which service products are delivered (Bitner, 1992) . This phenomenon has recently been discovered to be an essential component of employee and customer service satisfaction. In this sense, building design delivers a better indoor environment which then leads to more satisfied employees, which eventually influences the service quality of customers and better outcomes for their employees (Shen et al., 2021; Suh et al., 2015; Law et al., 2014; Lee and Jeong, 2012; Ruiz et al., 2012; Simpeh et al., 2011; Asadi et al., 2011) .

The building design is the most comprehensive and emerging strategy to enhance the quality of life and reduce the building's impact on employee health and performance. In the current study, building design is defined as an ecological building, which has plentiful indoor air quality, natural light, controllable thermal settings, layout, size, healthy and safe workplace to reduce the impacts of the building on human health and performance Cirrincione, 2020; Bangwal, 2019; Pietila et al., 2015; Zeigler, 2012) .

environmental design (LEED) is a commonly used rating system in the United States. LEED aims to reduce the environmental footprint of buildings while simultaneously protecting occupant comfort and health. They provide credits to new and existing buildings for adopting green design, operation, and maintenance. However, despite of the different rating systems, LEED is directly connected to individual occupant health. LEED standard follows a biological J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f systems approach and includes health components such as natural air, natural light, proper ventilation, acoustics, and thermal comfort. These rating systems help to reduce carbon footprint, energy consumption and provide a high level of satisfaction & performance (Bangwal, 2017; Gou et al., 2016; Hui et al., 2015; Kuziemko, 2015; Forsythe and Wilkinson, 2015; Lo et al., 2014) . Although in 2001, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) set up the Indian Building design Council (IGBC), it has adopted building design standards from USGBC for certifying building designs in India.

While the building design area has been investigated for more than decades, hardly any study had directed that investigate the role of building design features in the context of workspace and departmental space effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission according to employees. Workspace is define as an area used or required for one's work. It can be an employee cabin, cubical, or workstation. For example, the hotel reservation team and sales team do not have direct contact with employees and guests. Departmental space is defined as an area of socialization and circulation, such as a hotel cafeteria and operational area (Bangwal et al., 2017) . This study tried to investigate the direct and indirect potential relationship of building design (including workspace and departmental space effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission) with employee performance by mediating the role of employee mental and physical health. Such links are sporadic in the Indian viewpoint. The management must be careful about their building design to take advantage of the yields of superior performance. It also encourages other organizations to rethink about their building design to improve employee health and performance. Some qualitative studies have highlighted the benefits of building design on occupant health and satisfaction (Boyce and Hunter, 2003; Choi et al., 2012; Seppänen et al., 2002) . Drawing from the conceptual lenses of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model Demerouti, 2014, 2017; Demerouti et al., 2001) and its recent variant, the environmental demands-resources (ED-R) model (Roskams and Haynes, 2020) . We hypothesize that the building design would significantly affect employee performance because the building design has similar or identical effects on employee performance as other job demands and resources (Roskam et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2020) . According to the job demands-resources (JD-R) model theory, strain (i.e., health issues) is caused by a mismatch between job demands (i.e., unfavorable building design/ physical environment) and job resources (i.e., LEED-certified building design). As per the JD-R model, the existence of job demands (e.g., unfavorable J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f building design/ physical environment) can cause mental and physical health issues, leading to adverse employee outcomes such as lower employee performance Demerouti, 2014, 2017; Demerouti et al., 2001) .

During the COVID-19 crisis, job resources are primarily focused on building design features that assist employees in minimising the negative impact of job demands (e.g., an unfavorable building design/ physical environment) and their consequences (i.e., health issues and performance). LEED-certified building design makes the workplace more manageable by integrating nature into the employee workplace environment, which results, low mental and physical health issues, higher productivity, and improved employee performance. Hence, building design features may also function as environmental job resources. These resources activate a distinct motivational pathway, which boosts motivation and mitigates the effects of demands. In this way, environmental job resources (i.e., LEED-certified building design) support physical and mental health, which helps employees to perform better.

Additionally, the Hypothesis also draws upon the works of Nieuwenhuis et al. (2014) , Raanaas et al. (2011) , and Smith and Pitt (2009) that support the argument that biophilic designs have instorative effect and thus positively influence the various employee-related outcomes, including performance. All these studies view the physical environment as the resources or environmental resources that enhance the ability to cope with demands and/or higher levels of work engagement. Even though an unfavorable physical environment was identified as a potential job demand in the JD-R model, which is initially conceptualized (Demerouti et al., 2001 ), very few studies have clearly expressed building design with environmental factors as potential job demands or resources (Bangwal, 2019a) . Therefore, this study tries to address these gaps by identifying the relationship of hotel building design features with employee self-rated performance of hotel employees in the outbreak situation of COVID 19 under the theoretical framework of the JD-R model and ED-R model. Therefore, based on these arguments, we hypothesize H1. "Building design would significantly affect the employee performance".

In addition to the positive effect of building design on employee performance. The environmental demands-resources model supports a regenerative culture of wellbeing within organizations Serafeim et al., 2020; McNeely, 2018; Wahl, 2016) . Public health science and building science have proven that buildings design plays a significant part in our mental and physical health (MacNaughton et al., 2017; Weschler, 2009 ). According to Tennant (2007) , mental health is employee feelings (e.g., mental depression and stress) and how it copes with everyday life difficulties. However, physical health is employee feelings regarding Insomnia, asthma, and other respiratory problems (Spence et al., 1987) . The building design of any hospitality industry can affect the mental health and physical health of the employee due to the lack of fresh air, natural light, excess humidity, poor ventilation, cleanliness, hygiene, layout, and ergonomic design (Jablonska and Trocka-Leszczynska, 2020; Abdulaali et al., 2020; Amerio et al., 2020; Pietila et al., 2015; Thatcher, 2012; Henneberger, 2006; Hoskins, 2003) These unfavorable conditions cause employee dissatisfaction, poor health, and less performance. The number of researchers and associations supports the positive benefits of building design. In 2018,

Manufacturers Association (BIFMA, 2018) revealed a strong positive relationship between the building design and occupants' mental health. Another study has revealed that how building design features such as acoustic, indoor air quality, layout, thermal, size, and ventilation also exhibited a higher level of performance Geng et al., 2017; Leder et al., 2016) , it protects the employee from unwanted noise through acoustical design (Jahncke, 2012; Hatvani et al., 2016) , social distance between the employees by providing sufficient space and a building can also connect us to the nature (Da Silva et al., 2015) . As we know that COVID-19 is a severe respiratory disease, and a building design with a sound ventilation system, good air quality, and sufficient workspace help to reduce statistically significant 23% to 76% in respiratory infections among the building occupants (Fisk, 2000) . Few other studies also reported mental and physical health metrics with LEED-certified building design features. The study was conducted with 58 participants of renovated LEED-certified building and found a significant 8 % improvement in occupants' health and a significant decrease in respiratory infections in 18 months. (Jacobs et al., 2014; Breysse et al., 2011) . Building on the works of (e.g., Yu et al., 2020; Jablonska and Trocka-Leszczynska, 2020; Abdulaali, et al., 2020; Amerio et al., 2020; Pietila et al., 2015; Hatvani et al., 2016; Pereira et al., 2015; Da Silva et al., 2015; Thatcher, 2012; Jahncke, 2012;  J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Thayer et al., 2010) and recommendations of International Interior Design Association (IIDA), Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association (BIFMA) and theoretical frameworks of the JD-R model Demerouti, 2014, 2017; Demerouti et al., 2001) and ED-R model (Roskams and Haynes, 2020) , we hypothesize that building design would significantly affect employee mental and physical health. The environment demands-resources model along with SHINE (Sustainability and Health Initiative for Net-Positive Enterprise) model, highlight the importance of building design features as a key component of a regenerative work environment. Thus, we try to test it empirically through presenting the hypotheses, i.e., Building design would significantly affect employee mental health (H2a), and Building design would significantly affect employee physical health (H3a) in the context of the hospitality industry during COVID-19.

The existing literature recommends that performance can be measured in various ways, depending on the subject population and the type of study being conducted. In this study, we use the objective measurement to evaluate objective performance from the speed of task completion (such as service speed), quality of task, effectiveness, and absenteeism. Building designs produced consistent evidence that buildings design increased 28% of employee performance Abdulaali et al., 2020; Thatcher and Milner, 2012) due to a reduction in absenteeism. However, the only reduction in absenteeism cannot improve employee performance, it can also be improved by giving quality of work while at work (presentism), and these conditions commonly occur when the employees are mentally and physically satisfied (Saah et al., 2021; Amerio et al., 2020; Pieper, 2019; Monzani, 2018; Karatepe, 2012; O'neill and Davis, 2011) . Even employees' mental and physical health influence one another (Parks et al., 2006 ). An employee with mental health issues is more likely to be experiencing physical health symptoms (Huang et al., 2020; Shigemura et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2020 ). An employee with chronic physical conditions has a 41% increased relative risk of having a mental condition (Katon and Sullivan, 1990) , including poor diet, hypertension, asthma, diabetes, chronic pain and Alzheimer's disease (Shantanu and Kearsley, 2020; Sederer et al., 2006) . These mental and physical health conditions decrease employee performance levels (Saah et al., 2021; Aguiar-Quintana et al., 2021; Yeh, 2019; Pereira, 2015) .

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Burton et al. (2005) researched 28375 employees to identify the relationship between employee health and performance and found the unhealthy employees were 12.2% less productive than their counterparts. Various other researchers also investigate the relationship between health and performance (Yu et al., 2021; Tu et al., 2021; Saah et al., 2021; Aguiar-Quintana et al., 2021; Street and Lacey, 2019; Grawitch, 2017; Yang et al., 2008) . For example, Dewa and Lin (2000) conducted a study using the Ontario Health Survey data and found that employees suffering from mental and physical problems are less likely to show up for work and require more effort to function while at work relative to those who are mentally and physically fit (Khan et al., 2021; Teng et al., 2020; Pieper, 2019; Hemp, 2004) .

Employee weak mental (e.g., depression and stress) and physical health (e.g., asthma and other respiratory problems) is one of the vital sources of less performance and, thus, are tremendously expensive to employers (Shani and Pizam, 2009; Goetzel, 2001) . It has been estimated that more than $80 billion is lost each year in loss of performance related to health issues (Mann, 1996) . Thus, staying healthy is essential to the organization and its stakeholders, i.e., customers and employees. In the hospitality industry, it becomes necessary for the employee to stay mentally and physically healthy to provide better and safe services for increasing their demands in the market. Otherwise, it will decrease employee as well as organization performance (Wong et al., 2021; Tu et al., 2021; Pieper, 2019; Monzani, 2018; Grawitch, 2015; Evans et al., 2006; Faragher et al., 2005) . Therefore, based on the previous works and drawing from the theoretical framework of environment demandresources model, biophilia hypothesis (Ostner, 2021) , and nudging philosophy (Venema and van Gestel, 2021) grounded in these theoretical frameworks, we propose the Hypothesis, employee mental health would significantly affect employee performance (H2b) and employee physical health would significantly affect employee performance (H3b).

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

Based on the literature, we formulated the Hypothesis and conceptual model as shown in Fig.1:   Fig. 1 

The conceptual model is composed of one exogenous latent variable, ' Building design (GBL)', represented by workspace and departmental space effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission. One endogenous latent variable 'employee performance (EPM)' and two meditating variables' employee mental health (MHL)' and 'employee physical health (PHL)'.

Three LEED-certified hotels are referred to herein as Vana Malsi Estate located in northern India, Uttarakhand, ITC Grand Chola located in southern India, Chennai, and JW Marriott located in western India, Mumbai were selected for conducting the study. ITC Grand Chola and Vana Malsi Estate is LEED Platinum certified, whereas JW Marriott is LEED gold-certified Hotel by using a self-administered questionnaire with closed-ended items.

Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, an internet survey questionnaire was designed to facilitate users filling out on a mobile device. For developing the items for various constructs such as the (2007) and Spence et al.'s (1987) were used. Cronbach's alpha was used to ensure items' internal reliability and further validate by the discriminant and convergent validity by using AMOS v.26.

During January-June 2020, questionnaires were distributed to respondents via the internal mail systems by using a random sampling method. Out of 450 questionnaires, 302 were used for investigation, and others were omitted due to partial information. In our case, the response rate was 67% that was noticeably high, and representative of the population studied. It is considered a satisfactory response rate of the questionnaire survey based on recommended practices as discussed in many published literature. To validate the conceptual model fitness, the collected data were analyzed by using structural equation modeling. The survey questionnaire was divided into five sections: the first section comprises employee demographic details, such as organization name, age, gender, and education. The second part included a description of building design, employee health, and performance. A five-point Likert scale was used to measure the items ranging from strongly disagree (represented by 1) to strongly agree (represented by 5).

The demographic profile of the respondents shown in Table 1 , out of 302 respondents, 61% were male, and 39% were female. Selected respondents who came under the full-time employee category were 93%, and part-time (industrial trainees) were 7%. In addition, 59% of respondents were falling in the age group of 30-40 years, 41% of respondents were falling in the age group of 40-50 years. 

This multivariate statistical analysis technique is a combination of multiple regression analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). This statistical analysis technique has two mechanisms:

measurement model and structural model.

In this study, to establish the proposed theoretical model, model fit, and to test the construct reliability and validity of the measurement model (Ifinedo, 2006) , CFA was performed by adopting AMOS 26.0. The measurement model comprises five constructs, namely, Building design (GBL), which is represented by workspace effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission (WRK) and departmental space effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission (DMT), mental health (MHL), physical health (PHL), and employee performance (EPM). According to Sekaran (2003) , the value of Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.6 to 0.7 is reliable and above 0.7 consider as a good degree of reliability. As presented in Table 2 , the value of Cronbach's alpha is above 0.7 and close to 0.9. It means the internal consistency of the measurement items was acceptable.

Composite reliability (C.R.) is used to measure the reliability of a construct in the measurement model (Bangwal, 2019a; Hair et al., 2010; Netemeyer, 2003) . Table 2 shows that in the measurement model, Composite reliability (C.R.) of "WRK" is 0.971, "DMT" is 0.965, "MHL" is 0.972, "PHL" is 0.943 and "EPM" is 0.850, which is more than 0.7. Hence, all constructs have good reliability in the measurement model.

Convergent validity is a sub-type of construct validity. It is the extent to which an indicator relates to other indicators of the same phenomenon (Hair et al., 2019) to shows the degree to which indicators of a particular construct have a high percentage of variation in general (Hair et al., 2010) . The convergent validity is calculated by standard factor loading, standard factor loadings are correlation coefficients between measured and latent variables. It shows that the indicator significantly represents the latent variables. Above 0.50 is the acceptable value of standard factor loading (Hair et al., 2010) . As presented in Table 2 , the standard factor loading of the measured variable falls between 0.75 and 0.95. It means the measured variables are acceptable and proportionate to their latent variable. Thus, the convergent validity should be confirmed. (Hair et al., 2010) . Discriminant validity is considered reliable when average variances extracted (AVE) of the particular constructs are always more than the average shared variances (ASV) between the constructs, and the level of square root AVE should be greater than the correlation involving the constructs. "WRK" has low positive correlation with "MHL", "PHL" and "EPM" (0.52, 0.18, and 0.27), similarly, "DMT" has low positive correlation with "MHL", "PHL" and "EPM" (0.13, 0.05 and 0.01). It shows that all the variables are independent in the measurement model. Table 2 , shows that the particular constructs AVE are more than the ASV.

In Table 3 , the square roots of the AVEs are more than the off-diagonal elements in the related rows and columns go above the correlation between a specified construct, this shows that in the measurement model, a construct is more strongly correlated with its indicators as compared to the other construct. Therefore, we can determine that constructs discriminant validity is acceptable. Lewis index, and root mean square of error approximation were considered to determine the model fit (Hair et al., 2010) . To get the model fit the standard values of χ2/df < 3, CFI, GFI, NFI and TLI>0.9 and the RMSEA<0.08 (Gefen and Straub, 2000) . The result shows that we can proceed to test the structural model. 

The purpose of testing the structural model was to examine the hypothesised conceptual research model. Table 5 , depicts the goodness-of-fit for the model and the structural model properties such as Standard error, standard path coefficients (b), critical ratio, and proposed hypotheses result. It indicates that our structural model is accepted to examine the hypotheses. 

This study carried out a Parallel mediation analysis to test the mechanism between an independent variable and an outcome after including a third hypothetical variable, which we called a mediating variable. This study considers two mediating variables that are not causally interrelated. Therefore, we called it parallel mediation (Hayes, 2013) . Parallel mediation allows investigators to investigate different mediation theories concurrently in a model (Guevarra and Howell, 2015) . The path theory implicit three structural paths, one from GBL  EPM without

Mediating variables, Second from GBL  MHL EPM and third GBL  PHL  EPM with mediating variable. The significant mediation is supported via GBL  MHL EPM; however, the other meditational path, i.e. GBL PHL EPR is also supported as shown in Table 7 . 

As shown in Fig. 2 . Hypothesis 1 proposed that building design would significantly affect employee performance. Results of the SEM support this Hypothesis (β = .56, t = 4.53, p < .001),

indicating that LEED-certified building employees tend to be satisfied with their performance.

After running the structural model with mediating variable, the standardised path coefficient (β) from GBL  EPM was reduced by a non-trivial amount (β = 0.44) though still significant; thus, the mediation analysis supports the partial mediation.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f The path via GBL MHL EPM exhibit statistically significant indirect effects on EPM through employee mental health (z = 4, p < 0.001). Hypothesis H2a postulated a positive relationship between building design and employee mental health, employees experience more mentally fit while working inside the building after the COVID-19 pandemic and significantly supporting the Hypotheses H2a. As shown in Table 6 model 2, The path (Direct effect) from GBL to MHL was positive and statically significant (b = .765, s.e.= .0556 p<.001). However, Hypothesis H2b, which proposed that employee mental health would significantly affect employee performance, was also supported, therefore employee mental health positively leads to employee performance. As shown in Table 6 

In turn, the path via GBL  PHL EPM, the statistically significant indirect relationship was found between GBL and EPM through employee physical health (z = -2, p < 0.001). Hypothesis

H3a addressed that building design would significantly affect employee physical health; as expected, hotel building employees experience that building design support to access their work comfortably during COVID-19 and significantly support the hypothesis H3a. As shown in Table   6 model 1, the path (Direct effect) from GBL to PHL was positive and statically significant (b = 1.205, s.e.= .0610 p<.001). As shown in Table 6 model 3, the path (Direct effect) from GBL to EPM was positive and statically significant (b = .8478, s.e.= .0627 p<.001), indicating that employees feel more physically fit inside the building. The direct effect of PHL to EPM is negative but significant (b = -.2361, s.e.= .0313 p<.001). Thus, our Hypothesis H3b, which stated employee physical health would significantly affect employee performance, is also supported.

As shown in Table 6 , the Direct and Indirect effects of X on Y. If Zero falls within the LICI and ULCI, then null Hypothesis is accepted, which is Zero and insignificant. In this case, PHL and MHL are both significant. Whereas total effect is insignificant as Zero falls within the limit of LI The outcome of hypothesis testing is indicated in Table 7 .

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Notes: β, standardized beta coefficients; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

As discussed before, employee satisfaction and health is the most important factors for the hospitality industries during COVID 19. Hospitality industries understand the value of employee satisfaction and health because it improves loyalty and preference and eventually increases the organizational image and ultimately the organization's profit. However, this is only possible if the employee is mentally and physically satisfied in their workplace. Then, they can treat their customers more pleasantly and ensure a superior level of service. For this, we chose three LEEDcertified hotels in India. The results confirmed that the employees of LEED-certified buildings show their agreement that the hotel building design had positively affected their performance during the COVID-19 pandemic because they felt that the building design is compatible enough to prevent them from spreading coronavirus. It gives them a mental and physical relaxation.

These outcomes are significant in light of fact that organizations have confidence in building design and felt the necessity of building design to improve employee health and performance to fight with situation like COVID-19. Therefore, the hospitality industries, who design their J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f building as per the LEED standards, should generate higher employee performance due to its building design features, which provide a healthier workplace.

COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way of living, interaction, and working. COVID-19

increased the need of a healthy workplace, built environment, buildings, and offices, where the employee can maintain physical distancing and hygiene to be mentally and physically healthy.

This makes sense as a certified building designed to improve employee comfortability and privacy by reducing the possibility of virus transmission, unwanted microorganisms, overhear conversations and providing visual privacy, proper space, thermal comfort, natural air, and light (GBCA, 2013; Kim and de Dear, 2013; Schiavon and Altomonte, 2014) . Such initiatives provide a healthy platform for employee health and performance and develop new innovative approaches that will help in environmental and business sustainability.

The finding suggests that during this uncertain and unsustainable era, organization building design features will bring a sustainable value to our employees' mental and physical wellbeing. Hospitality organizations need to identify the importance of building design for sustainable development. Organizations building design can provide such a working platform, which reduces employee stress and absenteeism and boosts its health and performance. It is recommended to the stockholder, shareholder, building designer, architect, and engineers to understand what makes employees happy at work while following building design and construction. Because to work and stay in a safe and healthy working environment is the right of every individual and without the occupants mental and physical satisfaction within the building.

No one can perform better (Gou et al., 2016) .

There is some agreement as to how buildings, i.e., enclosed spaces where the number of occupants, either customers and employees, are brought together, are possible vectors for the transmission of infectious diseases like COVID-19, whether by airborne transmission or by aerosolised particles. With the advance of the COVID-19 pandemic, various temporary mitigation measures are already taken, such as closing schools, universities, and hotels, but we need a potential solution to stop this transmission. The building design is one of the prevention to protect occupants.

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitality employees spent the maximum of their time in the building. So that we need a radically new take on the building design. When building design, which directly affects the health and performance of the employee, is compromised, employees become more exposed to various syndromes that can be worsened by both economic and social factors in India. The expected yearly cost associated to sick building syndrome in commercial place of work is between $10 billion and $70 billion in the USA. This study suggest that the hospitality industry can improve employee mental and physical satisfaction and increase employee performance by focusing on their building design. While designing building structure, organizations and architecture designers think more about the cost that is always been important during building planning, whereas occupant cost is much higher than the cost of building construction and design. Therefore it is recommended to the hospitality industry leaders, public health experts, policymakers, researchers, practitioners and designers to think more about building design priorities, where occupants will connect to nature, able to find natural air, light, privacy, sufficient workspace for maintaining social distancing and promoting the importance of building design in maintaining physical and mental wellbeing in healthier working places.

The current study makes a significant theoretical contribution to the ongoing research about the physical environment and its responses by assessing how hospitality employees perceive hotel building design to mitigate the health risk of contracting the COVID virus in their workplace and further how it is associated with employee self-rated performance. After the COVID-19, many studies have been conducted in the hospitality sector about the safety of hospitality employees through cleanliness and hygiene (Byrd et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2021) .

However, little attention has been paid to how hotel building design acts as an important resource to reduce the risk of COVID-19 virus infection among hospitality employees.

As the COVID-19 situation becomes controllable, employees still feel unsafe in their workplace (Gralinski and Menachery, 2020) . One of the challenges is maintaining social distance to protect the safety of customers and employees while at work. It requires a low level of social contact was regarded as a solution for service industries (Chen et al., 2022; Sinclair et al., 2021; Alonso et al., 2020) . Some studies support physical environment, satisfaction, and productivity J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f integration (Yu et al., 2021 Choi et al., 2012; Bangwal et al., 2017; Schiavon and Altomonte, 2014; Newsham et al., 2013; Altomonte and Sachiavon, 2013; Menadue et al., 2013; Thatcher and Milner, 2012; Yang et al., 2010) . The current study complements these efforts by further unveiling the dilemma faced by hospitality employees during the COVID-19

pandemic. The current study help to recognize how we can ensure proper building design to mitigate health risks among hospitality employees in the hotel buildings. After the COVID-19

pandemic, this field of research seems to have grown in importance as many people suffer, especially hospitality employees who lost their jobs and health. This study also brings additional insights by introducing employees' mental and physical health as an imperative intervening construct between building design and employee performance. It was found that hospitality employees' mental and physical health strongly contributed to employee self-rated performance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our results recommend that when hospitality management and administration are convinced from the prominence of building design features, then, they perform a facilitator role.

In order to get better employee performance and productivity, the hospitality industry requires to motivate their employees by providing a green workplace for a healthy and satisfactory outcome and creating a sense of accountability among employees towards the workplace environment.

Such initiatives not only influence employee satisfaction but also influence the hospitality industry's image.

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed many aspects of our lives and is offering an opportunity to change how we design our buildings and working spaces. A comfortable and healthy building is an important contributor to mental and physical health. This study presents a need of changes in the sustainability requirements for buildings design that can be proper sanitization system to weaken the possibility of getting infected, new touchless technologies, sufficient spaces for better mental health, proper waste management system, are just a few solutions that can improve health and safety protection in our building.

The building design is a fascinating and emerging concept, but its relationship with employees' health and performance during COVID-19 is not well acknowledged yet in the field J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f of the tourism and hospitality sector. Building designers and architects need to make bold decisions to provide safe and healthy to end-users. Building design is becoming an increasingly important part of making our environment and employee greener and healthier for a better future.

Finally, although the study has reached its aim and got evidence to support the research hypotheses, there were some inescapable limitations. First, because of the large-scale outbreaks of infectious disease COVID-19 that create fear and mortality all across the globe, this research was conducted only in the selected geographical area in India. Secondly, we collect small sample sizes that increase type II error chance. Finally, there will be a need to check the spill-over effect of mental and physical health on employee performance across other industries in the future. Bangwal et al. (2017) Have easy access to equipment without direct contact with others during COVID-19

The layout of departmental space supports socialization/operation during COVID-19

Satisfaction with the ease of interaction with coworkers with proper distancing during COVID-19

Mental health This building design help to minimize the stress level during COVID-19

Warwick-Edinburgh,

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

The building design reduces the risk of depression during COVID-19

During COVID-19, I have been feeling relaxed while working inside the building

The building design reduces the risk of infection during This building helps to minimize health anxiety during COVID 19

Physical health

The building reduces the risk of respiratory problems Spence et al.'s (1987) The building reduces the risk of contagious viral infection (That made you feel uncomfortable) Building design makes me feel physically healthy Building design helps to minimize the chance of headache which occur due to poor ventilation in the workplace Building design reduces the risk of Insomnia Performance During COVID-19, Building design foster a positive, healthy work environment, which reduce my absenteeism Scale developed through discussion with experts from academics and industry During COVID-19, I feel mentally and physically healthy with building design, it directly helps me to complete my task in time During COVID-19, I feel mentally and physically healthy with building design, which helps to improve my quality of work During COVID-19, Building design provides the best indoor environment quality to perform effectively During COVID-19, Building design provides the best indoor environment quality to work with full capacity J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

A review on green hotel rating tools, indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and human comfort

Do job insecurity, anxiety and depression caused by the COVID-19 pandemic influence hotel employees' self-rated task performance? The moderating role of employee resilience

Green buildings and health

COVID-19, aftermath, impacts, and hospitality firms: an international perspective

Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings

COVID-19 lockdown: housing built environment's effects on mental health

Indoor air quality audit implementation in a hotel building in Portugal

Occupant health in buildings: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the opinions of building professionals and implications on research

Job demands-resources theory

Job demands-resources theory: taking stock and looking forward

Environmental design and awareness impact on organization image. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Workplace environment, employee satisfaction and intent to stay

Workplace design features, job satisfaction, and organization commitment

About BIFMA

Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees

Major depressive episodes and work stress: results from a national population survey

The Benefits of Daylight Through Windows. Lighting Research Center

Health outcomes and green renovation of affordable housing

The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity

Restaurants and COVID-19: what are consumers' risk perceptions about restaurant food and its packaging during the pandemic?

The fear of being infected and fired: examining the dual job stressors of hospitality employees during COVID-19

Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines

COVID-19 pandemic: prevention and protection measures to be adopted at the workplace

Impact of COVID-19 on Hospitality Sector -Estimated Revenue Losses

Building Certification Schemes and the Quality of Indoor Environment

The job demands-resources model of burnout

Chronic physical illness, psychiatric disorder and disability in the workplace

novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: built environment considerations to reduce transmission

Green buildings: a post COVID-19 analysis of preventive measures of spreading the virus

Mental health issues in the workplace: a case for a new managerial approach

Mental health, burnout and job satisfaction among mental health social workers in England and Wales

The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis

Estimates of potential nationwide productivity and health benefits from better indoor environments: an update. Lawrence Berkeley national laboratory report

Measuring office fit-out changes to determine recurring embodied energy in building life cycle assessment

The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption

The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity

Depression at work

Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers

Pandemics, tourism and global change: a rapid assessment of COVID-19

Green building for office interiors: challenges and opportunities

Return of the Coronavirus: 2019-nCoV

To be or not to be (stressed): the critical role of a psychologically healthy workplace in effective stress Management

Productivity loss due to mental-and physical-health decrements: distinctions in research and practice

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

To have in order to do: exploring the effects of consuming experiential products on well-being

The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak -an update on the status

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitality industry: review of the current situations and a research agenda

Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson Education

When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

Drivers and barriers to heat stress resilience

The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis

Presenteeism: at work--but out of it

The frequency of workplace exacerbation among health maintenance organisation members with asthma

Health effects due to indoor air pollution

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan

The effect of LEED certification on Shanghai's prime office rental value

Coronavirus impact: the impact of COVID-19 on the hospitality sector

Extending the Gable et al. enterprise systems success measurement model: a preliminary study

About IIDA. Vision and Mission

Advances in Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure

Health and housing outcomes from green renovation of low

Open-plan office noise: the susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech

Understanding workplace bullying

COVID-19 and green housing: a review of relevant literature

The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus

Job resources, work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a timelagged analysis

Depression and chronic medical illness

Hospitality and tourism industry amid COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on challenges and learnings from India

The effect of COVID-19 on the hospitality industry: the implication for open innovation

Workspace satisfaction: the privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices

LEED Buildings Outperform Market Peers According to Research

Progress in Chinese hotel research: a review of SSCI-listed journals

Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: a new analysis

Indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, and acute building-related health symptoms in green mark-certified compared with non-certified office buildings

Effects of e-servicescape on consumers' flow experiences

The benefits of sustainable office buildings in people's republic of China (PRC): revelation of tenants and property managers

The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health

Employee stress: an important cost in mergers

The effect of internal environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in commercial office buildings

Anxiety and the severity of tension-type headache mediate the relation between headache presenteeism and workers' productivity

Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications

Do ‗green' buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence

The relative benefits of green versus lean office space: three field experiments

Work stress and well-being in the hotel industry

A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment between People and the Office Environment

Morbidity and Mortality in People with Serious Mental Illness. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors

Report%20on%20Morbidity%20and%20Mortaility%20-%20Final%2011-06.pdf)

The impact of onsite workplace health-enhancing physical activity interventions on worker productivity: a systematic review

Evidence of workplace interventions-a systematic review of systematic reviews

Relationships between exposure to urban green spaces, physical activity and self-rated health

COVID-19 could leverage a sustainable built environment

Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting

Hostility or hospitality? A review on violence, bullying and sexual harassment in the tourism and hospitality industry

Hitting the reset button for hospitality research in times of crisis: covid 19 and beyond

Parental burnout around the globe: a 42-country study

Salutogenic workplace design

Creating customer value through service experiences: an empirical study in the hotel industry

Prevalence and predictors of work-related depression, anxiety, and stress among waiters: a cross-sectional study in upscale restaurants

Indoor environments and health: moving into the 21st century

Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings

Integrating care for medical and mental illnesses

Research Methods for Business a Skill Building Approach

Ventilation rates and health

Sustainability, business, and health

Work-related depression among hotel employees

How should clinicians integrate mental health into epidemic responses?

Assessment of indoor environmental quality in budget hotels using text-mining method: case study of top five brands in China

Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: mental health consequences and target populations

Servicescape and customer patronage of three star hotels in Ghana's metropolitan city of Accra

Caught between scylla and charybdis: how economic stressors and occupational risk factors influence workers' occupational health reactions to COVID-19

Healthy workplaces: plantscaping for indoor environmental quality

Understanding the effects of COVID-19 on the health and safety of immigrant hospitality workers in the United States

Impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern: differential effects on students' health and academic achievement

Accounting for employee health: the productivity cost of leading health risks

Invisible and intangible, but undeniable: role of ambient conditions in building hotel guests' loyalty

Mental health impact of COVID-19 on quarantine hotel employees in China

The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation

The impact of a ‗green' building on employees' physical and psychological wellbeing

Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress

The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health

COVID-19-induced layoff, survivors' COVID-19-related stress and performance in hospitality industry: the moderating role of social support

UNWTO, 2020. Tourism and Covid-19

A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment between People and the Office Environment

Occupational stress and intention to leave among employees in small and medium enterprises

Designing a Regenerative Culture

Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s

How the COVID-19 pandemic affected hotel employee stress: employee perceptions of occupational stressors and their consequences

Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: an empirical study

Job stress and well-being: an examination from the view of person-environment fit

Workplace health asset management: establishment of a potential health-related productivity loss estimation model

Hotels' ecofriendly physical environment as nature-based solutions for decreasing burnout and increasing job satisfaction and performance

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on employees' work stress, well-being, mental health, organizational citizenship behavior, and employeecustomer identification

The Green Building Revolution

What is a Green Building? And Fundamental Principles of Green Building and Sustainable Site Design. Governor's Green Government Council (GGGC)

Responding to a major global crisis: the effects of hotel safety leadership on employee safety behavior during COVID-19