key: cord-0736637-jhs4pih5 authors: Yang, Qiuyi; Kanjanarat, Penkarn; Wongpakaran, Tinakon; Ruengorn, Chidchanok; Awiphan, Ratanaporn; Nochaiwong, Surapon; Wongpakaran, Nahathai; Wedding, Danny title: Fear of COVID-19 and Perceived Stress: The Mediating Roles of Neuroticism and Perceived Social Support date: 2022-04-27 journal: Healthcare (Basel) DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050812 sha: 5fbe161c24815b34d06cddc4b3961dbae4abff85 doc_id: 736637 cord_uid: jhs4pih5 Background: Fear of COVID-19 leads to stress and may result in various kinds of mental health problems. Many factors are associated with an individual’s perception of stress, including neuroticism and perceived social support. This study aimed to examine the role of neuroticism and perceived social support as mediators of fear of COVID-19 on perceived stress. Methods: Data from 3299 participants aged ≥18 years from the HOME-COVID-19 survey in 2020 were used for analysis. Measurements used included the Fear of COVID-19 and Impact on Quality of Life Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale-10, the Neuroticism inventory and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-12. A parallel mediation model within a structural equation modeling framework with 5000 bootstrapping sampling was used to test the mediating effect. Results: Fear of COVID-19 had a direct effect on perceived stress (B = 0.100, 95% CI = 0.080–0.121, p < 0.001), whereas neuroticism, but not perceived social support, partially mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress (B = 0.018, 95% CI = 0.000–0.036). Among all types of social support, only perceived support from friends was a significant mediator (B = 0.016, 95% CI = 0.006–0.025). Conclusions: Neuroticism and perceived support from friends are critical factors in the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. Since the end of 2019, COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) has been spreading globally. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic affects the mental health of individuals and society directly and indirectly [1] . A recent report estimated the 2020 worldwide prevalence of stress symptoms, anxiety, stress response, depression, psychological distress and sleep problems at 24.1, 26.9, 36.5, 28.0, 50.0m and 27.6%, respectively [2] . Populations at higher risks of mental health problems include health workers, people with non-communicable chronic diseases, individuals with pre-existing mental health disorders, the elderly, people in isolation, patients with COVID-19, homeless people and refugees [2, 3] . COVID-19 pandemic has caused fear in people globally [4] [5] [6] . Fear of COVID-19 is described as fear of contracting COVID-19 by living with or near a person with COVID-19, failing to practice general prevention of COVID-19 or receiving or giving blood [7] . Excessive fear during crisis situations may produce harmful effects [5, 6, 8] . At a personal level, The scale comprises two parts, namely fear of COVID-19 (9 items) and impacts on quality of life (QoL) (8 items) . Regarding the fear of COVID-19 (FOC) part, each item on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 4 (I am the most fearful) to 0 (I am not fearful at all) and indicated the level of fear for each condition. A higher score indicates a higher FOC. For the Impact on QoL part, each item on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 4 (Most impacted) to 0 (Least or not at all impacted), indicated the level of impact of the fear. A higher score indicates a higher impact of fear. The total scores range from 0 to 68 with 0-36 in the FOC part and 0-32 in the impacts on the QoL part. A pilot study among 30 adult Thai participants demonstrated Cronbach's alphas of 0.925 and 0.911 in the FOC parts and impacts on QoL, respectively [54] . In the present study, the Cronbach's alpha of FOC was 0.878. The 10-item scale was developed to measure perceived stress [55] . It contains two factors-i.e., 6 items for stress and 4 items for control. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 4 (very often) to 0 (never) and indicated the frequency of feeling or thinking a particular way during the past month. A higher score indicates higher perceived stress, and scores range from 0 to 40. The Thai version was validated with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85, excellent goodness-of-fit and good validity [21] . Cronbach's alpha for the present study was 0.821. The Neuroticism Inventory (NI) was developed by Wongpakaran et al. and comprises 15 items, with a Cronbach's α of 0.83 [16] . Each item is scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 4 (Always like me) to 1 (Never like me). Scores range from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher neuroticism. Cronbach's alpha for the present study was 0.917. The MSPSS has been widely used globally [56] . The psychometric properties and factor structure of the revised Thai version were developed and studied in adult Thai samples [54] . Each item is scored on a seven-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 7 (very strongly agree) to 1 (very strongly disagree) and indicates the perception of how much exterior social support was provided by an individual. The scale demonstrates three sources of support (subscales): family (items 3, 4, 8 and 11), friends (items 6, 7, 9 and 12) and significant others (items 1, 2, 5 and 10). A higher score indicates higher perceived social support, with total scores ranging from 12 to 84, and each subscale ranging from 4 to 28. Cronbach's alpha was 0.87. The present study reported Cronbach's alphas of 0.913, 0.903, 0.916, and 0.888 for total, support from family, friends, and significant others, respectively. A total of 4004 eligible participants completed the online survey, and a related study displayed details of study participants [57] . Data were checked for multivariate normality, with 89 cases with standardized residuals greater than ±2.5 excluded. Then, Mahalanobis distance was used to detect the outliers at p-value < 0.001, and 432 cases were excluded. After data exploration, we found that there were small proportions of participants with unidentified gender and aged 60 years or older. Thus, we decided to further exclude 136 participants with unidentified gender and 49 participants aged 60 or older. Finally, 3299 participants were included in the analysis. Characteristics of the participants were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Perceived stress, fear of COVID-19, neuroticism and perceived social support are presented as mean, standard deviation and range (min-max). The covariates in the present study, including age, sex, marital status, education level, living status, religion, region of residence, occupation status, work from home, income, history of chronic non-communicable disease, health insurance and quarantine status were analyzed by number and percentage. Pearson's correlations were analyzed to identify associations between each pair of psychological variables, i.e., fear of COVID-19, perceived stress, neuroticism, total scale of perceived social support and the subscales of perceived social support from significant others, family members and friends. To identify associations between psychological variables and potential covariates to include in mediation analyses, we performed parallel multiple mediation analysis. Structural equation modeling was performed for mediation analyses to identify direct effect of fear of COVID-19 on perceived stress and indirect effect of fear of COVID-19 on perceived stress via neuroticism and perceived social support. To examine model fitness, the following fitness indices were used: the comparative-fit index (CFI), >0.95; the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), >0.95; the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), <0.06 [58] . The model was tested using a maximum-likelihood estimation method for covariance matrices. Unstandardized regression coefficients and p-values were reported for the coefficients and bootstrap confidence intervals for the conditional indirect effects. Confidence intervals that did not include zero were indicative of statistical significance. Hypothesized model. We hypothesized that there were positive correlations between fear of COVID-19, perceived stress and neuroticism, while there were negative correlations between fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support, between perceived social support and perceived stress and between perceived social support and neuroticism. We also hypothesized that there was a significant direct effect of fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress and a significant indirect effect of fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress through neuroticism and perceived social support (parallel mediation) ( Figure 1 ). All significant covariates were controlled in the mediation model. We performed mediation analyses of overall perceived social support using the total scale (Model 1) and subscales from each source of perceived social support, i.e., support from significant others (Model 2), family members (Model 3) and friends (Model 4). Stata 14 statistical software was used for all analyses in the present study, with significance levels set at <0.05. Figure 1 . Hypothetical parallel mediation model description. The coefficient "a1" symbolizes the regression coefficient between fear of COVID-19 and neuroticism; the coefficient "b1", between neuroticism and perceived stress. The coefficient "a2" refers to the sectional regression coefficient between fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support; the coefficient "b2", between perceived social support and perceived stress; and the correlation "d", between neuroticism and perceived social support. The coefficient "c'" represents the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress when the mediators are added. The coefficient "c" stands for the coefficient in the regression model without the mediators. As shown in Table 1 , of 3299 participants (mean age, 28.52 ± 9.9 years), 1025 (31.1%) were male and 2274 (68.9%) were female, 1679 (50.6%) participants had a bachelor's degree or higher education level, 2715 (82.3%) participants were single and 2864 (86.8%) of the participants were Buddhist. The average perceived stress, fear of COVID-19, neuroticism and perceived social support scores were 17.61 ± 5.76, 20.84 ± 7.07, 36.27 ± 9.57 and 59.01 ± 13.48, respectively. . Hypothetical parallel mediation model description. The coefficient "a1" symbolizes the regression coefficient between fear of COVID-19 and neuroticism; the coefficient "b1", between neuroticism and perceived stress. The coefficient "a2" refers to the sectional regression coefficient between fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support; the coefficient "b2", between perceived social support and perceived stress; and the correlation "d", between neuroticism and perceived social support. The coefficient "c'" represents the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress when the mediators are added. The coefficient "c" stands for the coefficient in the regression model without the mediators. All significant covariates were controlled in the mediation model. We performed mediation analyses of overall perceived social support using the total scale (Model 1) and subscales from each source of perceived social support, i.e., support from significant others (Model 2), family members (Model 3) and friends (Model 4). Stata 14 statistical software was used for all analyses in the present study, with significance levels set at <0.05. As shown in Table 1 , of 3299 participants (mean age, 28.52 ± 9.9 years), 1025 (31.1%) were male and 2274 (68.9%) were female, 1679 (50.6%) participants had a bachelor's degree or higher education level, 2715 (82.3%) participants were single and 2864 (86.8%) of the participants were Buddhist. The average perceived stress, fear of COVID-19, neuroticism and perceived social support scores were 17.61 ± 5.76, 20.84 ± 7.07, 36.27 ± 9.57 and 59.01 ± 13.48, respectively. As shown in Table 2 , age, sex, education level, religion, marital status, region of residence, income and quarantine status were significantly associated with perceived stress, neuroticism and fear of COVID-19 at p < 0.05. In contrast, occupation, education level, religion, health insurance, work from home and history of chronic non-communicable disease were related to perceived social support. In Table 3 , fear of COVID-19 negatively correlated with perceived social support (r = −0.037, p < 0.01) and positively with perceived stress (r = −0.176, p < 0.001) and neuroticism (r = 0.050, p < 0.001). Notably, perceived stress had a stronger positive correlation with neuroticism (r = 0.685, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with perceived social support (r = −0.381, p < 0.001). Moreover, neuroticism negatively correlated with perceived social support (r = −0.330, p < 0.001). The subscales with three different sources of perceived social support had similar results to the total scale with other psychological variables. From multivariable regression analysis, fear of COVID-19, perceived social support, neuroticism and the following covariates, i.e., age, sex, education level, religion, occupation status, history of chronic non-communicable disease and quarantine status were shown to be associated with perceived stress (R 2 =0.533, F (16, 3282) = 234.42, p < 0.001). These variables were included in the mediation analysis. The direct, indirect and total effects of fear of COVID-19 on perceived stress, while considering neuroticism and perceived social support as a presumed mediator, are displayed in Table 4 . The mediation analysis is visually presented in Figures 2-5 . First, as reported in Figure 2 (Model 1), when controlling covariates, neuroticism, the first mediator, was regressed on perceived stress and fear of COVID-19 (paths a1,b1). Results showed a significant positive association between neuroticism and fear of COVID-19 (B = 0.048, p = 0.047) as well as perceived stress (B = 0.347, p < 0.001). The second mediator, perceived social support, was regressed on fear of COVID-19 (path a2), which was not significant, p > 0.05. When perceived social support was regressed on perceived stress (B = −0.074, p = 0.001), a significantly negative path (b2) was revealed. Then, we analyzed the subscale of perceived social support, i.e., social support from significant others, family members and friends in the parallel mediation model (Model 2/Model 3). The results indicated that fear of COVID-19 was not significantly associated with perceived social support from family members and significant others when controlling covariates, p > 0.05. Fear of COVID-19 was only significantly associated with perceived social support from friends (B = −0.047, p = 0.001). Through two mediators, neuroticism and perceived social support from friends, we observed a strong positive effect both for neuroticism (a1b2 = 0.018, 95%CI = 0.000-0.036) and for perceived social support from friends (a2b2= 0.016, 95%CI = 0.006-0.025). In Figure 5 (Model 4), the direct effect of fear of COVID-19 on perceived stress (c') was 0.100 (95%CI = 0.080-0.121, p < 0.001). The total indirect effect through two mediators (a1b1 + a2b2) was 0.023 (95%CI = 0.005-0.042, p = 0.013). Regarding the model fitness, all models were shown to have the best fit model, resulting in the following fitness statistics: CFI = 1.000, TFI = 1.001, RMSEA < 0.001. In summary, neuroticism and perceived social support from friends were significant mediators of the relationships between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress when controlling covariates. Regarding the model fitness, all models were shown to have the best fit model, resulting in the following fitness statistics: CFI = 1.000, TFI = 1.001, RMSEA < 0.001. In summary, neuroticism and perceived social support from friends were significant mediators of the relationships between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress when controlling covariates. Figure 2 . Mediation analysis test on fear of COVID-19 concerning perceived stress and mediating role of neuroticism and perceived social support and controlling covariates, i.e., age, sex, education level, religion, occupation status, history of chronic non-communicable disease and quarantine status (n = 3299). Note: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. Regarding the model fitness, all models were shown to have the best fit model, resulting in the following fitness statistics: CFI = 1.000, TFI = 1.001, RMSEA < 0.001. In summary, neuroticism and perceived social support from friends were significant mediators of the relationships between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress when controlling covariates. Mediation analysis test on fear of COVID-19 concerning perceived stress and mediating role of neuroticism and perceived social support and controlling covariates, i.e., age, sex, education level, religion, occupation status, history of chronic non-communicable disease and quarantine status (n = 3299). Note: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. Figure 3 . Mediation analysis test on fear of COVID-19 concerning perceived stress and mediating role of neuroticism and subscale of perceived social support from significant others and controlling covariates, i.e., age, sex, education level, religion, occupation status, history of chronic non-communicable disease and quarantine status (n = 3299). Note: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. Figure 3 . Mediation analysis test on fear of COVID-19 concerning perceived stress and mediating role of neuroticism and subscale of perceived social support from significant others and controlling covariates, i.e., age, sex, education level, religion, occupation status, history of chronic non-communicable disease and quarantine status (n = 3299). Note: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. The major objective of the study was to test whether and how fear of COVID-19 affects perceived stress during the primary stage of the pandemic in Thailand. Consequently, neuroticism and perceived social support were studied as presumed mediators in that relationship. The present study documented a parallel model of neuroticism and perceived social support from friends that mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. In line with other related studies, the results of this research indicated that fear of COVID-19 positively correlated with perceived stress and neuroticism [31] [32] [33] 38, 49, [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] . These results confirmed the findings from other countries during the pandemic. Fear of COVID-19 directly affected perceived stress in the present study. This suggests that aggravated fear of COVID-19 was related to increased perceived stress levels in the Thai population. Infectious diseases can cause instinctive fear [5, 6, 65, 66] , and fear of COVID-19 varies in different regions and different populations [5, 33, 34, 49, 50, 62, [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] . At the same time, heightened fear is concerned with the social learning of fear, in that fear can be learned through other individuals or social media [72] , and people repeatedly exposed to COVID-19 information express more fear of COVID-19 [57] . Another significant factor involved the associated state quarantine, which may have exacerbated their fear [5, 8, 72, 73] . A partial intersection was observed between stress and fear mechanisms [74] . The increasing fear of COVID-19 level activates those parts of the brain that trigger the release of stress hormones such as cortisol. These, together with the loss of economic resources and uncertainty about the future, put considerable pressure on the population studied [74, 75] . In line with previous studies [47, 48, 76, 77] , individuals with higher perceived social support had lower perceived stress. Perceived social support serves as a significant factor in psychological adjustment, leading to reduced stress [78, 79] . Findings from other studies among Chinese students have found that social support can prevent negative psychological and emotional effects [80, 81] Perceived social support from friends was the most negatively correlated with fear of COVID-19. This could be because most of the participants in the study were young. Previous evidence demonstrated that the mere perceived existence of social support, or even just reminders of such, could decrease physical and psychological responses to threats [82] . The mechanism of this effect remains unclear, but we speculate that social support may reduce individuals' physical and psychological responses to COVID-19 threats, consequently reducing fear of COVID-19 [47, 48, 51, 76, 77] . We found a negative correlation between neuroticism and perceived social support, which was in line with previous research [83, 84] . Higher neurotic individuals may experience lower perceived social support because their poor relationship satisfaction leads to limited socialization due to their characteristic negative emotions [85, 86] . Neuroticism mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress in the present study. In general, individuals with higher neuroticism levels tend to have higher perceived stress levels when exposed to the same levels of fear of COVID-19 in Thailand. Neuroticism was not only positively associated with fear of COVID-19 but was positively associated with panic buying and fear of death during the pandemic [87, 88] . The findings from the present study reinforce the previous finding that neuroticism was associated with stronger emotional responses, poorer emotional perceptions, emotional coping and emotional experience [89] . Neuroticism was also found to be the most significant factor influencing the perception of threat from COVID-19 [38] . Further, the relationship between neuroticism and stress was the same as that in studies reported during the pandemic [40, 42, 89] . Individuals with higher neuroticism levels also focused more on COVID-19-related information and worried more about the aftermath of the pandemic [41] . These factors all led individuals to experience higher levels of neuroticism, more negative emotions and higher stress levels during the pandemic [41, 42, 90] . Some longitudinal studies have found that neuroticism increases the possibility of stressful experiences in the lifestyles of highly neurotic individuals, and these stressors in turn trigger common mental disorders [91] [92] [93] . Longitudinal data also showed that higher neuroticism levels resulted in higher levels of subjective stress and cortisol, and that neuroticism could predict the accumulation of biological stress during the COVID-19 period [43] . The current study is the first to discover that perceived social support from friends has a mediating role between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. Family and friends provide practical and emotional support when individuals need help coping with stressful life events [94] . Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government implemented social distancing policies (e.g., work from home, online study, or even lockdown) [28, 73, 95] . Subsequently, people spent more time with their families at home or with friends who live together. For young adults, social support from a friend had an important impact on the psychological effects of the pandemic. Previous studies of Chinese students found that peer support was an important source of social support for college students [80, 81] . We speculate that perceived social support from family did not moderate the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress, but rather had a direct effect on perceived stress due to high perceived social support in Thai adults in the present study, even during the pandemic. A study of Thai adults during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that about 40-58% of the participants reported better relationships with family by providing care, communicating, offering emotional support, supporting problem-solving for each other and participating in family activities [96] . Direct association of perceived social support from family on perceived stress during the pandemic in adult populations has been reported in adult populations in different countries [77, 97] . In addition, numerous studies have shown that perceived social support plays a role as a moderator or regulator of stress [82, 98, 99] by altering the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which is associated with the stress response system [100, 101] . A moderation effect of perceived social support was not tested in the present research, but we will investigate this moderation effect in a future analysis. Compared with participants from other countries, the Thai participants exhibited lower perceived stress and fear of COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic [13, 34, 68, 95, 102, 103] . Among Southeast Asian countries, the first COVID-19 cases outside of China were reported in Thailand [104] . During the data collection period, Thailand was at the primary stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, with about 3000 confirmed cases reported, of which most were concentrated in Bangkok [105] . The situation was not considered as serious as in other countries during this period [106] . The Thai government implemented lockdown measures nationwide on April 3, 2020 (e.g., declaring a nationwide curfew, requiring people to wear masks, maintaining social distancing and enforcing nighttime curfew in some areas), which effectively stopped the viral transmission and the number of new cases continued to decline [104] . These may be the reasons that Thais were less fearful of COVID-19 than those in other countries during this period. Regarding other sociodemographic variables, it is anticipated that fear, perceived stress and neuroticism, but not perceived social support, are associated with advanced age, female gender and low income. However, for other variables, i.e., religion, occupation and work from home, the findings cannot be simply explained. The present study is the first investigation of the relationship between COVID-19 fear and perceived stress though neuroticism and perceived social support. The sample size is large. The study has some limitations. First, the current study design is cross-sectional, and it cannot offer definitive conclusions about causal effects among fear of COVID-19, neuroticism, perceived social support and perceived stress. Second, the online and selfreported surveys may contain response biases. In particular, the study design did not allow us to reach residents without Internet access who might have suffered during the pandemic. Not only that, but some participants with higher perceived stress might not have been able to complete the questionnaire. Finally, the study did not address whether families or friends tested positive for COVID-19; this would obviously affect fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. In order to reduce perceived stress as a result of fear of COVID-19 during the beginning of the pandemic, governments must provide sufficient and accurate information about the transmission and preventive actions to the public to counterbalance false information that triggers more fear. In addition, all sectors of society should carry out education campaigns to further disseminate public health information and prevent the spread of the disease; in particular, signs of perceived stress should be communicated to the public. If this was done, people could easily and earlier identify the perceived stress experienced by themselves and their family, friends and social network. In addition, healthcare providers, family and friends should observe and monitor stress from fear of COVID-19, particularly in individuals at high risk of stress, such as individuals with neuroticism personality traits, and prioritize support to these individuals. Although, there was some limitation to social gathering during the pandemic, for young adults it is important to keep connections and communication with close friends and family members through available methods (e.g., social media) to provide mutual support. Political leaders should organize alternative quarantine protocols for people who experienced fear and stress and should arrange for them to stay with family or friends. Moreover, cooperation between family, friends and significant others, including schoolteachers, counselors, colleagues, healthcare providers and community leaders to provide instrumental, emotional support and reliable information support to reduce stress during the pandemic are crucial to prevent future mental health problems. These findings suggest that neuroticism, fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support affected perceived stress in adults during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. The most important finding was that social support from friends proved particularly important for young people, and highly neurotic individuals were at higher risk for stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, neuroticism and perceived social support from friends significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. Specifically, higher levels of neuroticism were related to higher levels of fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. Higher levels of perceived social support from friends were related to lower levels of fear of COVID-19 and perceived stress. In the future, an intervention related to providing support from friends might be designed to decrease the perception of stress, especially among young people during the COVID pandemic. Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis Incremental validity of coronaphobia: Coronavirus anxiety explains depression, generalized anxiety, and death anxiety Badri, T. Phobia and Fear of COVID-19: Origins, complications and management, a narrative review Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 Mental health circumstances among health care workers and general public under the pandemic situation of COVID-19 (HOME-COVID-19) Psychological distress associated with COVID-19 quarantine: Latent profile analysis, outcome prediction and mediation analysis Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in Discrimination, and Hate Crimes in Chinese-Speaking World amid COVID-19 Pandemic Commentary: Physiological and Psychological Impact of Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of anxiety and fear for COVID-19 toward infection control practices among Thai healthcare workers Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia Baseline characteristics of depressive disorders in Thai outpatients: Findings from the Thai Study of Affective Disorders Role of perceived stress in postoperative delirium: An investigation among elderly patients The role of perceived stress and cognitive function on the relationship between neuroticism and depression among the elderly: A structural equation model approach Personality disorders and perceived stress in major depressive disorder Sleep problems during COVID-19 pandemic and its' association to psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on weight status and factors associated with weight gain among adults in Massachusetts The Relationship between Psychological Distress during the Second Wave Lockdown of COVID-19 and Emotional Eating in Italian Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Emotional Dysregulation The Thai version of the PSS-10: An Investigation of its psychometric properties Food and mental health: Relationship between food and perceived stress and depressive symptoms among university students in the United Kingdom Associations of chronic stress burden, perceived stress, and traumatic stress with cardiovascular disease prevalence and risk factors in the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study The relationship between perceived stress and emotional distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: Effects of boredom proneness and coping style Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis The global prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and, insomnia and its changes among health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis Survey on perceived work stress and its influencing factors among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan Perceived stress and generalized anxiety in the Indian population due to lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Palestinian Health Care Workers' Stress and Stressors During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study Mental distress and influencing factors in nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 Relationship between the fear of COVID-19 disease and sleep quality: The mediating role of stress How does stress affect life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic? Moderated mediation analysis of sense of coherence and fear of coronavirus Examining the Mediating Effects of Stress on Fear of COVID-19 and Well-being Using Structural Equation Modeling Fear of COVID-19 as a buffer in the relationship between perceived stress and life satisfaction in the Polish population at the beginning of the global pandemic Public health significance of neuroticism Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship From neuroticism to anxiety: Examining unique contributions of three transdiagnostic vulnerability factors The Role of Personality, Political Attitudes and Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Explaining Individual Differences in Fear of Coronavirus: A Comparison over Time and Across Countries Neurotic Generation of COVID-19 in Eastern Fear of death in the shadow of COVID-19: The mediating role of perceived stress in the relationship between neuroticism and death anxiety Neuroticism and emotional risk during the COVID-19 pandemic Personality and perceived stress during COVID-19 pandemic: Testing the mediating role of perceived threat and efficacy Resilience and personality as predictors of the biological stress load during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany Which personality traits can mitigate the impact of the pandemic? Assessment of the relationship between personality traits and traumatic events in the COVID-19 pandemic as mediated by defense mechanisms Social support: A review. In The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes The Effect of Fear of the COVID-19 on Depression Among Chinese Outbound Students Studying Online in China Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: The Role of Resilience and Social Support Fear of COVID-19 and general self-efficacy among Turkish teachers: Mediating role of perceived social support Anxiety, depression, stress, fear and social support during COVID-19 pandemic among Jordanian healthcare workers COVID-19 Fear, Resilience, Social Support, Anxiety, and Suicide among College Students in Spain The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnant Women: Perceived Stress, Social Support and Sleep Quality Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) Fear of COVID-19 and impact on QoL Scale A global measure of perceived stress The multidimensional scale of perceived social support Exposure to COVID-19-Related Information and its Association With Mental Health Problems in Thailand: Nationwide, Cross-sectional Survey Study Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Association between perceived stress, fear and anxiety of COVID 19 with self-care in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study College students' stress and health in the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of academic workload, separation from school, and fears of contagion Covid-19 fear, happiness and stress in adults: The mediating role of psychological resilience and coping with stress Fear of COVID-19, Stress, and Anxiety in University Undergraduate Students: A Predictive Model for Depression Investigating Links Between Fear of COVID-19, Neuroticism, Social Networks Use Disorder, and Smartphone Use Disorder Tendencies Neuroticism and Fear of COVID-19. The Interplay Between Boredom, Fantasy Engagement, and Perceived Control Over Time Evolution, Culture, and the Human Mind Handbook of Emotions Fear and Practice Modifications among Dentists to Combat Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak Fear of COVID-19 and the mental health consequences in America Fear of COVID-19, psychological distress, work satisfaction and turnover intention among frontline nurses Worry and Workplace Harassment Related to the COVID-19 Epidemic Among Employees in Japan Prevalence and Impact on Mental and Physical Health Knowledge, attitudes, and fear of COVID-19 during the Rapid Rise Period in Bangladesh Social learning of fear Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations Sex differences in anxiety disorders: Interactions between fear, stress, and gonadal hormones Mental Health Care Evaluation Survey Research, G. Association of job loss, income loss, and financial burden with adverse mental health outcomes during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Thailand: A nationwide cross-sectional study Well-being of Polish university students after the first year of the coronavirus pandemic: The role of core self-evaluations, social support and fear of COVID-19 Does social support affect perceived stress? A research during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey The Effects of Social Support on Sleep Quality of Medical Staff Treating Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China Social support as a moderator of the relationship between anxiety and depression: An empirical study with adult survivors of Wenchuan earthquake Academic Stress, Depression, and Social Support: A Comparison of Chinese Students in International Baccalaureate Programs and Key Schools Role of perceived social support on depression in Chinese adolescents: A prospective study examining the buffering model Unpacking the buffering effect of social support figures: Social support attenuates fear acquisition Healthcare 2022 Predicting change in perceived social support in late life: The role of personality and gender The Relationship Between Big Five Personality and Social Well-Being of Chinese Residents: The Mediating Effect of Social Support The interaction between neuroticism and gender influences the perceived availability of social support Pandemic buying: Testing a psychological model of over-purchasing and panic buying using data from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic The Relationship of Fear of Death Between Neuroticism and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Toward a neurogenetic theory of neuroticism The role of extraversion and neuroticism for experiencing stress during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic Corumination, interpersonal stress generation, and internalizing symptoms: Accumulating effects and transactional influences in a multiwave study of adolescents Life events, anxious depression and personality: A prospective and genetic study life events and negative thoughts in the development of depression in adolescent girls Networks in the Knowledge Economy COVID-19 Pandemic: Demographic Predictors of Self-Isolation or Self-Quarantine and Impact of Isolation and Quarantine on Perceived Stress A study of the stress, anxiety and family relationships among Thai people after the COVID-19 pandemic in the early stages Perceived stress of Cypriot college students during COVID-19: The predictive role of social skills and social support Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis A Safe Haven: Investigating Social-Support Figures as Prepared Safety Stimuli Social Support Can Buffer against Stress and Shape Brain Activity Perceived social support and children's physiological responses to stress: An examination of the stress-buffering hypothesis Examining Anxiety, Life Satisfaction, General Health, Stress and Coping Styles During COVID-19 Pandemic in Polish Sample of University Students Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general Chinese population: Changes, predictors and psychosocial correlates Positive impact of lockdown on COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand COVID-19-WHO Thailand Situation Reports, WHO Thailand Situation Report-71 World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard We thank the HOME-COVID-19 researchers for conducting the HOME-COVID-19 study. The authors declare no conflict of interest.