key: cord-0733939-y00fffqx
authors: Frédéric, Rivière; François, Lefèvre; Julien, Burger; Guilherme, Dias de Melo; Nicolas, Tournier Jean; Emmanuelle, Billon-Denis
title: Two-photon microscopy analysis reveals different pulmonary damage after infection by influenza or SARS-CoV-2
date: 2021-10-02
journal: Respir Med Res
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmer.2021.100862
sha: 4efb0834d7852356f562e6ae68a33ca525cdecf1
doc_id: 733939
cord_uid: y00fffqx

nan

Dear Editors, COVID-19 and influenza have different epidemiology and clinical features (1) (2) (3) but histological data has indicated that both cause same epithelial lesions and diffuse alveolar damage (4) . To investigate these pandemic respiratory system viruses we used 2-photon microscopy (2PM) on animal model to compare structural lung damage, viral localization and macrophage recruitment in pulmonary epithelial tissue 72 hours after infection with either the A/PR8 Influenza strain infection in mice or SARS-Cov-2 infection in hamsters. The use of 2PM enabled the visualisation of a thick section of an entire lung while maintaining excellent resolution.

The method section has been divided into sub-parts describing animals, viruses, infection modalities and antibodies used for each virus. For Influenzavirus infection, Mice. Six-to 8-week old male transgenic mice (C57BL/6 background) expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) under the control of the CD11c promoter (a kind gift of Dr. Lefevre F., Molecular Immunology and Virology Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy en Josas, France) called CD11c-YFP mice. Mice were handled under specific pathogenfree conditions. Influenzavirus. A/Puerto Rico/8/34/H1N1, which express a fluorescent protein (Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP)) fused to the NS1 protein (RFP-NS1-PR8), were generated previously by using reverse genetics. Infection protocol. Three mices were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and were intranasally infected with 10 5 PFUs (plaque-forming units) of RFP-NS1-PR8. Three hamsters were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and were intranasally infected with 6.10 4 PFUs of SARS-CoV-2. For both species, 1 Mock-infected animals received the physiological solution only with the same procedure. Infected and mock-infected animals were housed in separated isolators for each species and all animals were followed-up daily with body weight and clinical score. At day 3 post infection, mices and hamsters (infected and mock) were euthanized by cervical dislocation, prepared with intracardiac perfusion of 10ml PBS then 10ml 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution. After lung harvesting, left lobe was glued on Vibratome® stage (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and immersed in PBS. In order to achieve smooth sectioning of lung, lung was cut in two parts at 10 μm/s with vibration amplitude of razor blade of 3mm. Lower section (4mm thick) was glued on 83mm Petri dish and immersed in PBS for imaging.

We chose day 3 post infection because hamsters had lost 25% weight (ethical endpoint), so we compared with mice infected at the same day post infection. Immunofluorescence staining protocol was described in legend of each figure.

For both species, infected and mock-infected lung sections have followed the same experimental protocol.

Ethics. All animal care and experiments conformed to the guidelines for animal experiments of the European legislation about animal experimentation, and were approved by the animal research committee of Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées.

Two-Photon microscopy. The intravital imaging was performed by using an LSM 780 NLO (Carl Zeiss) equipped with an infrared laser (Chameleon; Coherent). To acquire images, the wavelength of the first laser was set to 1100nm for excitation of RFP and AF568. The wavelength of the second laser was set to 850nm for excitation to YFP, second harmonic and BV421. Each lung section of infected and mock-infected animals of both species was fully explored by microscopy to map of affected areas.

The results have been illustred and described on figures 1 and 2 and their legends (above). M2P has clearly highlighted several differences between 2 viruses about viral localization, repartition and localization of pulmonary damage and macrophage recruitment.

After infection, the figure 1 showed that SARS-Cov2 was localized within alveolar epithelium (C) while Influenzavirus was mainly bronchial (D). This figure also showed bronchial epithelium integrity was preserved during a SARS-CoV-2 infection (E) but destroyed by Influenzavirus (F).

The figure 2 showed that infection with SARS-CoV-2 induced focal damage and focal macrophage infiltration, resulting patches of healthy (B) and diseased tissue (A). While infection with Influenzavirus caused diffuse, homogenous lung damage and diffuse macrophage recruitment from the perivascular area (C).

In conclusion, SARS-Cov-2 and Influenzavirus are both respiratory viruses with microscopic pathophysiological differences. This could help to explain their observed clinical differences and the need for different therapeutic approaches. M2P could explain some physiopathological difference: bronchial integrity after SARS-Cov2 infection could be one of explanation of less risk of bacterial infectious complication comparatively with important risk due to epithelium damage after influenza infection. 2MP appears to be promising tool for exploring viral pathophysiology, comparing respiratory viruses and testing therapeutic strategies in preclinical stage. Spike antibody and a secondary antibody coupled with AF568, an orange-red dye. In (F) the mouse tissue was stained with an endogen fluorescence NS1 coupled with a red fluorescent marker (RFP) to visualise the influenza virus. The bronchial epithelium (E) had a normal structure 72 hours following infection with Sars-Cov-2 in contrast to the epithelium (F) which showed signs of severe injury following infection with Influenzavirus. . In all slides an F4/80 antibody coupled with a blue BV421 fluorescent marker was used to stain the macrophages. In slides (A) and (B) the SARS-Cov-2 Spike antibody and a secondary antibody coupled with AF568 (an orange-red dye) were used to stain the SARS-Cov-2 virus and in slide (C) an endogenous, fluorescent NS1 coupled with a red fluorescent marker (RFP) were used to visualise the influenza virus. Macrophage recruitment in SARS-Cov-2 infected lungs was heterogenous, with diseased (A) and healthy areas (B) in the same organ. This variation in macrophage distribution differed from the general, diffuse macrophage recruitment from the perivascular area observed in lung tissue after infection with influenza (C).

Coronaviruses: a paradigm of new emerging zoonotic diseases

Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study

COVID-19 is not "just another flu": a real-life comparison of severe COVID-19 and influenza in hospitalized patients in

Lung Histopathology in Coronavirus Disease 2019 as Compared With Severe Acute Respiratory Sydrome and H1N1 Influenza