key: cord-0733646-4nplavbv authors: Elsalem, Lina; Al-Azzam, Nosayba; Jum'ah, Ahmad A.; Obeidat, Nail title: Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students’ preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences date: 2021-01-23 journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054 sha: 4bba0a9d3e8ed378d9e60edb39052c595fcb82a8 doc_id: 733646 cord_uid: 4nplavbv BACKGROUND: Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), distance education has been extensively implemented in all educational institutes and remote electronic exams (E-exams) have been adopted as a primary mode of assessment. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the experience of students at faculties of Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing and Applied Medical Sciences at (Educational Institute) regarding remote E-exams preferences and academic dishonesty during the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey composed of 16 questions, prepared using Google forms and distributed through students' E-learning platforms. The survey explored factors affecting students' preference for remote E-exams, methods for course assessment/evaluation, factors related to students’ exam dishonesty/misconduct during remote E-exams and measures that can be considered to reduce this behavior. Data were analyzed using descriptive, cross tabulation and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among 730 students, approximately only one third preferred remote E-exams. This was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with academic major, efforts/time for remote E-exam preparation, questions appropriateness with study material, and academic achievements (students Grade Point Average (GPA), curriculum objectives). Combining both exams and quizzes was the most preferred method of assessment (30%), while submission of reports or short written assignments was the least preferred ones. Exam dishonesty/misconduct appears as one of the major challenges with remote E-exams. The main measures considered by students to reduce exam dishonesty included substituting the exam with other forms of assessment, using different exam forms, the use of online proctoring solutions and considering compulsory pass/fail grades. CONCLUSION: Results suggested less preference of remote E-exams among students at medical faculties. Findings from this study are highly valuable to plan for academic strategies to overcome difficulties and challenges of remote E-exams. These might include improvement for the distance teaching methodologies, rearrangement of assessment options, modification of the academic curriculum to fit the current situation, and adopting certain measures to prevent exam dishonesty and maintain academic integrity. Coronavirus disease was declared officially by the World Health organization (WHO) as pandemic on March 11, 2020 . [1] Covid-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). This new virus is very contagious, transmitted mainly by aerosols from coughing and sneezing and has rapidly spread worldwide. Among infected patients, 70% are asymptomatic or have very mild symptoms, while the remaining 30% exhibit a wide range of symptoms that can be life threating. [2] Most countries attempted restrictive measures to achieve containment of the disease. Those measures include the prevention of social contacts, the ban of movements within the national territory, the closure of all non-essential activities, and suspension of all educational activities. [3] Most universities worldwide have either suspended or canceled their campus events such as classroom lectures, conferences, workshops, and sports. Faculty members transitioned their teaching to distance online teaching. [4] [5] [6] However, online learning cannot achieve the required intended learning outcomes if students do not have internet access due to technical or economic issues. [7] The absence of face-to-face interaction between the students and the instructor as well as the lack of traditional classroom socialization are amongst the issues encountered with higher education students. [4, 8, 9] Upon the abrupt transition to distance online education, many challenges have been observed by educational institutions. In particular, students assessment and the way for exam conduction appeared as major concerns. [10] Electronic examinations (Eexams) are considered as integral element in distance education systems. [11] Incampus E-exams have long been utilized by educational institutes as a students' assessment tool. [12] Remote E-exams were adopted by most educational institutes during the pandemic. However, many difficulties were recognized including the possible technical problems related to internet connectivity/E-exam platforms and impracticality of such exams to assess clinical skills. [10, 13] In addition, concerns regarding the academic dishonesty has been recently raised. [14] With all difficulties and challenges, remote E-exams were linked to students' stress with negative impact on students' behaviors and dietary habits. [15] J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Different assessment methods were applied during distance assessment include synchronous and asynchronous methods of assessment, assignments, assessment portfolios, multiple choice questions, open book exams, and oral exams. [16] However, the possible exam dishonesty behaviors among students necessitate the application of certain measures to maintain the academic integrity. These include proctoring solutions, re-arrangement of the E-exams structure (using different forms, one way exams, reduce number of questions/page, reduce time limits), and changing the mode of assessment (oral exams, substituting exams with other forms of assessment). [10] Preparing and adopting such measures in all subjects will require additional costs, efforts and time. Likewise, the grading and evaluation problems might arise with remote E-exams particularly with practical/clinical courses. Further, new strategies and/or technologies must be applied for anti-plagiarism and avoiding dishonesty. [17] Here in (educational institution), distance online teaching has been applied as mode of learning shortly after the announcement of Covid-19 pandemic. The students experience has revealed the preference for the traditional classroom teaching methods more than the online teaching. [4] The remote E-exams were also considered as the main assessment method during the pandemic. Since it was the first experience of our students to this type of exams, it was described as being more stressful compared with in-campus exams. [15] Accordingly, the aim of this cross sectional study was to investigate, using an electronic survey, the factors affected the medical sciences students' experience with remote E-exams and various aspects associated with exam preferences and academic dishonesty in such mode of assessment. 2019. [18] An initial questionnaire was prepared by four faculty members who are actively involved in educating students at various faculties of medical sciences (Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing and Applied Medical Sciences) in (Institute name) . Initially, the questionnaire was piloted on 30 students and was then finalized and approved. Questionnaire was prepared using Google Forms and a link was sent to medical sciences undergraduates via their E-learning accounts. A follow up reminder was sent after three and six days. The questionnaire was collected after the final exam period of the summer semester. The survey contained 16 questions that collected students' demographics (academic major and gender) and aimed to assess the students' experience of remote Eexams, with the main focus on (1) determining factors affecting the students' preference of remote E-exams compared with in-campus exams and defining students' preference regarding methods for course assessment and evaluation (2) identifying factors related to students' exam dishonesty/misconduct during remote Eexams and measures that can be considered to reduce this behavior. Students were asked about 11 factors that might contribute to students' preference of E-exams. These include exam related factors such as efforts/time needed for preparation, whether exam questions were appropriate with study material, exam structure (navigation, number of questions/page, type of exam) and exam dishonesty. Other factors also include the students' academic achievement Statistical packages Minitab version 17.0 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics were used to report students' demographics, course assessment and evaluation preference, and possible measures to curb exam dishonesty. Cross tabulation and Chi-square test were performed to identify any association between students' preference of remote E-exams and demographic factors as well as association with exam related factors and students' academic achievement. The association between exam dishonesty/misconduct during remote E-exams with students' gender and exam related factors was also analyzed using Chi-square test. In this study, 730 students from faculties of medical sciences agreed to participate and have completed the survey. More than half of respondents were from Faculty of Medicine (53.70 %), while the least participation was from Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences ( Table 1 ). The majority of participants (63.15%) were females. Participants' demographics of are shown in Table 1 . Students were asked whether they prefer the in-campus or remote E-exams ( Table 2 ). The majority of respondents (498; 68.22 %) preferred in-campus E-exams, while around one third of students (232; 31.78%) preferred the remote E-exams. This was found to be significantly associated with the students' academic major (P= 0.007). More than one third of students from Faculties of Medicine and Applied Medical Sciences (36.22% and 36.84%, respectively) preferred remote E-exams, compared with only less than fifth of students at Faculty of Pharmacy (17.86%). However, exam preference was not found to be associated with students' gender (P=0.161). Students were asked about factors that might contribute to students' preference of Eexams (Table 3) . Those include exam related factors such as efforts/time needed for preparation, whether exam questions were appropriate with study material, exam structure (navigation, number of questions/page, type of exam) and exam dishonesty. Other factors also include the students' academic achievement (expected GPA, actual GPA and achievement of curriculum goals). Around half of all respondents (49.86%) reported that more efforts and time were spent in preparation for remote E-exams compared with in-campus exams. This was found to significantly affect the students' preference of E-exams. Majority of students who preferred remote E-exams reported that similar efforts/time were needed for exam preparation (40.95%) as for in-campus exams, while the majority of students who preferred the in-campus exams reported that more preparation was needed for the remote E-exams (57.03%). Regarding the students' response about whether the questions were appropriate with study material, the percentages of students who reported that questions were not appropriate with study material were higher for all material types including theory (53.15%), lab (35.34%) and clinical (32.74%) than percentages of students who agreed that questions were appropriate. This was found to be statistically significant (P ≤ 0.004) and affect the students' preference of E-exams, with most students who considered questions as not appropriate with study material preferred the in-campus exams. Regarding the exam structure, almost all students (95.48%) preferred the free navigation between questions, half of students preferred five questions/page and more than two thirds (71.92%) preferred regular exams rather than open book exams. However, all of the aforementioned exam structure related factors were not found to affect the students' preference of Eexams (P>0.05). Students were asked whether they have exam misconduct and dishonesty during the remote E-exams. More than half of the students (55.07%) reported that they have no exam dishonesty or misconduct, while the other half reported that they seek assistance from friends (20.41%) or all other possible sources (24.52%). Of note, this was found to be significantly related to the students' preference for E-exams. Among students who preferred remote E-exams, 63.36% reported no exam misconduct and dishonesty compared with 51.20% of students who preferred the in-campus exams. This might be attributed to the observation that higher percentage of students who preferred remote E-exams considered that exam questions were appropriate with study material and thus they were less likely to behave in dishonest way to answer exam questions. In comparison, higher percentages of students who preferred in-campus exams reported that remote Eexam questions were not appropriate with study material, and thus they might have behaved in dishonest way to be able to answer exam questions. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Factors related to students' academic achievements were evaluated whether they might affect the students' preference for E-exams. Among all students, 50.96% expected that their GPA will be higher with remote E-exams while 16.44% expected a lower GPA. However, upon being assessed with remote E-exams, only 30.41% of students had higher GPA, while 36.71% reported no GPA change and 32.88% got lower GPA. Of note, around 62.33% of all students reported that upon being assessed with remote E-exams, they have not achieved the objectives of their curriculum. It was found that both the actual GPA and achievement of curriculum objectives to be significantly associated with the students' preference for E-exams. Among students who preferred the in-campus exams, 41.57% reported that GPA was lower than usual and 72.69% considered that they have not achieved the curriculum objectives. In comparison, 40.09% of students who preferred the remote E-exams reported that their GPA was increased and 59.91% reported that they have achieved the goals and objectives of their curriculum. Since most students reported that remote E-exams need more efforts and time for preparation, considering other ways for assessment and evaluation might reduce these challenges with remote E-exams. Students were asked about their preference for methods of course assessment and evaluation. Students were allowed to choose more than way of assessment. As shown in Figure 1 , the majority of students chose combining both exams and quizzes as mode of assessment, while all other choices that included writing reports were the least selected. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Students were asked about the exam dishonesty during the remote E-exams. Possible factors that might be underlying this behaviour include students' gender and exam related factors (efforts/time needed for preparation, exam questions appropriate with study material). Those were assessed using Chi-square analysis (Table 4 ). There was no significant difference between male and female students regarding the exam misconduct. However, exam related factors such as efforts/time needed for preparation were found to be significantly associated with student's Eexam dishonesty. Although the majority of students reported that they spent more efforts/time for remote E-exam preparation, the percentages of students who spent less efforts/time for exam preparation were higher among students who have exam dishonesty with help from friends (34.23%) or search from all possible resources (28.49%). In addition, the appropriateness of theory and clinical exam questions with study material was found to be significantly associated with student dishonesty. Students were asked about possible measures that can be considered to reduce exam dishonesty. These include proctoring solutions, modifications of exam structure (using different forms, one way exams, reduce number of questions/page, reduce time limits), change the mode of assessment (oral exams, substituting exams with other forms of assessment) and to consider the grade as compulsory pass/fail rather than actual grades. As shown in Figure 2 14 .8% and 6.6% of students, respectively. Conducting oral exams was considered by only 6.8% of students as a measure to reduce exam dishonesty. The higher education system around the world has implemented the online teaching as an approach for distance learning shortly after the announcement of Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, E-exams were conducted from distance and considered as a primary mode of assessment for students' academic progress during the pandemic. Although E-exams were well documented to be approved by many educational institutes including (our institute) years before the pandemic, they were mainly conducted in-campus. [19, 20] Therefore, considering remote E-exams has raised valuable concerns for educational institutions, faculties and students. [21] Accordingly, in this cross-sectional study among students at faculties of Medical Sciences (Country), the students' perception about the experience of remote E-exams was evaluated. Factors that might affect students' preference of remote E-exams versus in-campus were assessed. In addition, exam dishonesty/misconduct was investigated as one of the major drawbacks of remote E-exams. In this study, remote E-exams were less preferred among two thirds of students compared with in-campus E-exams. This is the first time for students at (our institute) to be exclusively taught by online learning and assessed by remote E-exams. [4, 15] The unfamiliarity of educators and students and the lack of essential requirements in to remote E-exams might also have negatively affected the students' preference of remote E-exams. [11, 22, 23] In this study the majority of students reported that more efforts/time are needed to prepare for remote E-exams compared with in-campus. This was found to be significantly associated with students' inclination toward in-campus exams.. The needed efforts/time might be related to the diversity of teaching methods and the variable study materials/resources used during the distance education. Here in (our institute), lectures were given in a hybrid method including Synchronous (online live classes) and Asynchronous (pre-recorded) learning. [4, 9] The latter involved the use of narrated power point, recorded videos, PDF handouts and slides. [4] Therefore, students might have spent more efforts to study for remote E-exams from all sources collectively. In this study, higher percentage of all respondents reported that questions were not appropriate with course' study material including theory, laboratory and clinical components. This was found to significantly affect the students' preference and might be related to the challenges encountered during distance education. [24] The optimal online course delivery necessitates the adoption of audio/video-designed classes as well as optimization of delivery methods and teaching materials. [25] In addition, robust infrastructure/platforms and well-skilled technology support teams are considered as essential elements for the success of online education. [26] The abrupt shift to distance education and assessment due to the COVID-19 pandemic revealed many challenges for educators such as inadequacies in their online curriculum teaching experience, training, and support from educational technology teams. [24, 26] Further, the practical and clinical contents cannot be optimally provided without a supervised interactive experience. [27] This is a major concern in Faculties of Medical Sciences with a strong professional orientation or practical components that are difficult to be assessed and validated by remote E-exams. [10, 26] Considering the aforementioned factors might have contributed to the note of inappropriateness of exam questions with study material. Factors related to students' academic achievements were also found to significantly affect the students' preference for E-exams. Around 62.33% of all students reported that upon being assessed with remote E-exams, they have not achieved the objectives of their curriculum. Previous studies also reported that one of the major challenges with remote education during the pandemic was the ability to maintain and guarantee curriculum delivery integrity, its assessment, educational outcome achievement, and curriculum objective fulfillment. [26, 28, 29] . Instructors were asked abruptly to initiate online teaching without a previous preparation. [30] Students had also to cope with sudden changes in teaching methods, despite the possible connectivity problems, resources constraints, and variations in knowledge and skills related to online learning. [31, 32] Student's GPA might contribute to students' preference of remote E-exams. Half of students surveyed in this study expected to have higher GPA with remote E-exams. However, upon being assessed only one third of students have higher GPA, and thus might significantly contributed to students' preference of E-exams. Further, a large part of practical objectives in the curricula of Faculties of Medical Sciences that were difficult to be provided using online tools had put students at these faculties at highly challenging situations. [26] Based on aforementioned observations, educational administrators had to carefully balance between students' safety, educational standard, and their responsibility toward the community in graduating skilled and safe health care providers. [24, 26, 33] The second main part of this survey concerned with exam dishonesty/misconduct as a major challenge with remote E-exams. [34] [35] [36] Students during in-campus E-exams receive similar exam invigilation. However, in remote E-exams students will take the exam from home. [14] In this study, around 40% of students reported that they seek assistance from friends or all other possible sources. This was found to be significantly associated with student's efforts/time spent for exam preparation and the appropriateness of theory and clinical exam questions with study material. Recent studies also have revealed exam dishonesty as an obstacle related to remote E-exams. [35, 37] Considering all these observations, many educational institutions have recommended several measures to prevent academic dishonesty. [36] In this study, the main measures considered by students included substituting the exam with other forms of assessment, using different exam forms, the use of online proctoring solutions and considering compulsory pass/fail grades. Student authentication checking systems might influence the assessment process. [38, 39] Online proctoring relies on many technological tools to prevent or reduce exam dishonesty. [10] Many educational institutions have applied online proctoring systems as being effective measures for the supervision of remote E-exams. [40, 41] Recent study comparing non-proctored and proctored online exam scores revealed significant differences in exam average between the two sections and supported the necessity for proctored exams. [41] However, such systems require financial and human supports. In addition, a negative impact on students mental health and wellbeing was recently raised as a concern with the use of online proctoring systems, [42] and therefore, educational institutions have recommended other measures to prevent academic dishonesty. [37, 43] Substituting the exam with other forms of assessment could include asking students to write an essay on a controversial issue, analyze and interpret data, or solve a realworld problem. [10, 44] Although cheating cannot be totally eliminated, educators can design questions for which students need to reflect on their personal situation or their own experience with the course. [44] However, this might be more suited to assess students' mastery of the course content and capacity to think at higher cognitive levels. [10] Further, it will be impractical to apply such assessment method for bigger classes where students number might exceed 200. Administering different sets of exam questions to different students in E-exams reduces the risk of student interaction with each other. This was adopted by many universities during the pandemic. [37] However, additional investment is needed from exam developers to design large panel of questions. In addition, the questions should be with the same level of difficulty to ensure the reliability and fairness Further, it has limited value with other forms of cheating such as searching for answers from the Internet. [10] Strict E-exams duration is another solution to limit dishonest behaviors. However, it was only chosen by 6.6% of surveyed students. It can reduce dishonesty when the time for cheating competes with the time needed to answer exam questions. [10] The exam durations are set to allow the highest performing students just to have enough time to complete the test within the given time limits, while average students would only be able to answer between 60 to 80% of exam questions. [10] It is also important J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f to ensure a fair treatment of students as they do not always take their exams under the same conditions. If all requirements are met, limited exams duration can be an effective way to reduce academic dishonesty without the need of proctoring technologies. [10] However, the major drawback will be on students with special needs who cannot take the privilege of extra time for their exams since the online exam settings cannot be changed. The mode of navigation between questions might be considered as a measure to reduce exam dishonesty. Recent studies reported the mode of navigation as students' concern and the one-way exams not allowing students to access the previous questions is not a favorable mode. [11, 15] However, it might be valuable if the same questions set will be used combined with shuffling in the order of questions and choices. In our study only 10%of students considered one-way exams to reduce exam cheating. Conducting oral exams was considered by only 6.8% of students as a measure to reduce exam dishonesty. E-exams can be redesigned as synchronous oral exams. Oral exams provide other advantages such as limiting the risk of technical failure and ensuring that assessment and grading can, where appropriate, be adjusted to students' individual situations and constraints. [10, 43] This was considered as one of the best solutions to reduce dishonesty by other educational institutions. [37, 43] However, given the large number of students as in Faculties of Medical Sciences, oral exams need a significant time investment from faculty members. [43] Here in (our institute), most faculties adopted the use of different exam forms, limit the exam duration and applying one way navigation mode to reduce the students' dishonest behaviors. This study was conducted in a single institution, and therefore the lack of generalizability of the findings might be a limitation. In addition, the study was conducted at the early phase of the pandemic where most faculty members have minimal experience in distance education and most students have a first-time experience for distance education and E-exams. Further, most students were under the stress of the pandemic and its associated lifestyle changes. In this cross-sectional study, approximately only one third of students from Faculties of Medical Sciences preferred the remote E-exams as a mode of assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic. This was found to be significantly associated with more efforts/time needed for exam preparation, inappropriateness of exam questions with study material and students' academic achievements. Findings from this study are highly valuable to plan for academic strategies that will help in overcoming difficulties of remote E-exams. These might include improvement for distance teaching methodologies, rearrangement of assessment options and modification of the academic curriculum to fit the current situation. Exam dishonesty/misconduct appears as one of the major challenges with remote Eexams that negatively affects the academic integrity and was significantly associated with efforts/time spent for exam preparation and inappropriateness of exam questions with study materials. Considering the experience of other worldwide educational institutes and based on the recommendations of exam committees at faculties of medical sciences in (educational institute), most faculties adopted the use of different exam forms, limit the exam duration and applying one way navigation mode to reduce the students' dishonest behaviors. Many thanks for all students from faculties of medical sciences who participated in this study. Authors declare no conflict or competing interest. No funding received. Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed 9. References J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Outbreaks and emergencies/Novel Coronavirus 2019 Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus School Closure During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: An Effective Intervention at the Global Level? JAMA Pediatr Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff. Cureus COVID-19 and dental clinical practice: Students and clinical staff perceptions of health risks and educational impact Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives Perception of health and educational risks amongst dental students and educators in the era of COVID-19 A cross-sectional study to determine factors affecting dental and medical students' preference for virtual learning during the COVID-19 outbreak. Heliyon A Pilot Study of an Electronic Exam System at an Australian University e-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment Emergency remote teaching during Coronavirus pandemic: the current trend and future directive at Middle East College Oman. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Cheating in e-exams and paper exams: the perceptions of engineering students and teachers in Norway. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Stress and behavioral changes with remote E-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID 19 Pandemic. Pakistan journal of medical sciences Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery An international review of eExam technologies and impact E-Assessments Systems: A Comparison of the Views of Samples of Students and Professors A novel approach to medical school examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic Attitude of Ash-Shobak University College Students to E-Exam for Intermediate University Degree in Jordan Remote electronic examinations: student experiences COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Use of online technology for multimedia education Framework for curriculum delivery during COVID-19 pandemic in a health sciences university Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial Challenges of Online Medical Education in Pakistan During COVID-19 Pandemic Perspectives From Rising Fourth Year Medical Students Regarding Strategies to Counteract the Effects of COVID-19 on Medical Education COVID-19 and medical education. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Medical Education and Path to Residency in Ophthalmology in the COVID-19 Era: Perspective from Medical Student Educators Response to COVID-19 pandemic: Beyond medical education in Brazil What lies in the year ahead for medical education? A medical student's perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic Online Delivery and Assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding Academic Integrity. Education Sciences Academic Integrity During COVID-19: Reflections From the University of Calgary. International Studies in Educational Administration Is Online Assessment in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 Pandemic Reliable? Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: teachers' perspectives A Comparative Study of Online Remote Proctored versus Onsite Proctored High-Stakes Exams Implementing remotely proctored testing in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing Examining the Necessity of Proctoring Online Exams Exploring academic integrity and mental health during COVID-19: Rapid review Journal of Contemporary Education When old becomes new: a case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Evaluation of academic integrity of online open book assessments implemented in an undergraduate medical radiation science course during COVID-19 pandemic Unique Identifying number or registration ID Hyperlink to your specific registration J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Highlights:• Remote E-exams are less preferred in two third of students from faculties of medical sciences. • Efforts/time needed for remote E-exam preparation, questions inappropriateness with study material, and academic achievements were the main factors for students less preference of remote E-exams.• Exam dishonesty appears as one of the major challenges with remote Eexams.J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f The following information is required for submission. Please note that failure to respond to these questions/statements will mean your submission will be returned. If you have nothing to declare in any of these categories then this should be stated. All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Please state any sources of funding for your research All sources of funding should be declared as an acknowledgement at the end of the text. Authors should declare the role of study sponsors, if any, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. If the study sponsors had no such involvement, the authors should so state. Research studies involving patients require ethical approval. Please state whether approval has been given, name the relevant ethics committee and the state the reference number for their judgement. Authors must obtain written and signed consent to publish a case report from the patient (or, where applicable, the patient's guardian or next of kin) prior to submission. We ask Authors to confirm as part of the submission process that such consent has been obtained, and the manuscript must include a statement to this effect in a consent section at the end of the manuscript, as follows: "Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request".Patients have a right to privacy. Patients' and volunteers' names, initials, or hospital numbers should not be used. Images of patients or volunteers should not be used unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and explicit permission has been given as part of the consent. If such consent is made subject to any conditions, the Editor in Chief must be made aware of all such conditions. Even where consent has been given, identifying details should be omitted if they are not essential. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic pedigrees, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning and editors should so note.This study was approved by the Deanship of Research and the Institutional Review Board at Jordan University of Science and Technology (IRB number: 12/135/2020). The survey started with the following sentence: "Please note that your valid participation in this research study is voluntary. You may choose not to participate. This survey is anonymous, and we do not collect identifying information such as your name or email/IP address. Please specify the contribution of each author to the paper, e.g. study concept or design, data collection, data analysis or interpretation, writing the paper, others, who have contributed in other ways should be listed as contributors.L.E: study concept, design, data collection, data interpretation, writing the paper. N.A: study design, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper. A.J: data Collection, writing the paper N.O: data collection, editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript and responsible for similarity index.J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, all research involving human participants has to be registered in a publicly accessible database. Please enter the name of the registry and the unique identifying number (UIN) of your study.