key: cord-0732839-k9dlpurt
authors: Yamasaki, Eiki; Nishikawa, Hiroki; Goto, Masahiro; Matsui, Masahiro; Asai, Akira; Ushiro, Kosuke; Ogura, Takeshi; Takeuchi, Toshihisa; Nakamura, Shiro; Kakimoto, Kazuki; Miyazaki, Takako; Fukunishi, Shinya; Ohama, Hideko; Yokohama, Keisuke; Yasuoka, Hidetaka; Higuchi, Kazuhide
title: The Relevance in the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases
date: 2022-04-03
journal: J Clin Med
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11072012
sha: 7849442cdc309421fba80526fceb13fb299b6c07
doc_id: 732839
cord_uid: k9dlpurt

We sought to clarify the relevance in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the SARC-F score in patients with gastrointestinal diseases (G-Ds, n = 672, median age = 73 years). Univariate and multivariate analysis for the SARC-F score were performed. Advanced malignancy was identified in 162 patients (24.1%). The median of NLR for all cases was 2.65. The median of NLR in ECOG-PS 0 (n = 436), 1 (n = 128), 2 (n = 49) and 3 or 4 (n = 59) was 2.26, 2.97, 4.41 and 5.99 (overall p < 0.0001). NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). The median of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (recommended value for sarcopenia, n = 84) and <4 (n = 588) was 5.87 and 2.48 (p < 0.0001). In all subgroup analyses, similar trends were seen. In the multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS (p < 0.0001) and NLR (p < 0.0001) were independent factors, while age had a trend for significance (p = 0.0686). In conclusion, we would like to emphasize the usefulness of NLR, a simple marker assessed only by blood tests, in predicting the possibility for sarcopenia by the SARC-F in G-Ds.

Sarcopenia, defined by a decrease in the quantity and quality of skeletal muscle, can be broadly divided into primary sarcopenia, which is associated with aging, and secondary sarcopenia, which is due to malnutrition, physical inactivity, and disease burden itself [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] . Patients with gastrointestinal diseases (G-Ds) are prone to secondary sarcopenia due to a combination of increased protein catabolism caused by an increased inflammatory response, metabolic abnormalities, and malnutrition caused by poor dietary intake [10] [11] [12] . On the other hand, SARC-F, which is a screening method on sarcopenia, is a questionnaire with five questions [13] [14] [15] . Subjects reply to these questions on a scale of 0 to 2, and the total points are assessed (possible range: 0-10 points) [14] . Subjects with a SARC-F score of four points or more are regarded as quite likely being cases of sarcopenia [14] . The higher SARC-F score can be associated with reduced physical function [16, 17] . The latest international judging standards on sarcopenia recommend the use of SARC-F as a first screening method on sarcopenia [18, 19] . We have reported that elevated SARC-F score can be an adverse predictor in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancy [11] .

White blood cells are classified into neutrophils, lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, and monocytes. Neutrophils and lymphocytes are used not only as indicators of immune function, but also as indicators of inflammation. Neutrophils are mainly involved in acute phase inflammation, while lymphocytes are mainly involved in chronic phase inflammation [20] . The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be a helpful prognostic marker in advanced malignancies, and a recent meta-analysis has reported that elevated NLR is linked to an adverse outcome in numerous solid malignancies [21] . Neutrophils play a significant role in the production of (1) ligands that promote malignant cell proliferation and invasion and (2) cytokines that promote angiogenesis. An increase in neutrophils is therefore closely related to tumor growth and metastasis [22] . On the other hand, lymphocytes are responsible for the immune function of the host, and a decrease in lymphocytes can damage the host's anti-tumor immunity and worsen the prognosis [23] . Thus, in advanced cancer, NLR reflects the balance between tumor promotion and anti-tumor immune status [24, 25] .

However, as far as we are aware, there have been no reports regarding the relevance in the NLR and the SARC-F score in patients with G-Ds. We have decided to conduct the current research because we believe that these problems need to be solved.

In our department, we have asked each hospitalized patient to respond to the SARC-F questionnaire and to test grip strength (GS) on admission. From October 2020 until November 2021, there were 672 Japanese G-D individuals having both SARC-F score and data for GS in our medical record. Blood test results were the results on admission. First, the relevance in the NLR and baseline features such as ECOG-PS and the SARC-F score was explored. Univariate and multivariate analysis for the SARC-F score were subsequently performed. The analyzed factors in the univariate and multivariate analysis were continuous parameters. We defined advanced cancer as stage III or severer cancer. Decrease in GS was defined as <28 kg (male) and <18 kg (female) as recommended elsewhere [18] . The SARC-F score ≥4 was decided to involve highly possibility for sarcopenia [18] . The relevant ethics committee of our hospital gave an approval of ethics (approval number, 2021-165).

In analyzing continuous variables, we selected the appropriate method among Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Pearson correlation coefficient r for comparing 2 groups, and also selected the appropriate method between ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing multiple groups. Variables with statistically significant correlation with the SARC-F score were entered into a multivariate regression analysis by the least square method, and candidate parameters were finally selected. A continuous variable was shown as a median with interquartile range (IQR). A p value of 0.05 was a threshold for significance by the JMP ver. 15 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Baseline data (at the time of admission) for all analyzed subjects (n = 672, 415 males and 257 females, median (IQR) age = 73 (63-79) years) are summarized in Table 1 . The median (IQR) of body mass index (BMI) was 22.0 (19.6-24.4) kg/m 2 (missing data, n = 2). ECOG-PS 0 was seen in 436 patients (64.9%), 1 in 128 (19.0%), 2 in 49 (7.3%), 3 in 41 (6.1%) and 4 in 18 (2.7%). Upper gastrointestinal disease (U-G-D) was seen in 161 patients (advanced malignancy, 39 cases (24.2%)), lower gastrointestinal disease (L-G-D) in 178 (advanced malignancy, 30 cases (16.9%)), biliary and pancreatic disease (BP-D) in 236 (advanced malignancy, 65 cases (27.5%)) and liver disease (L-D) in 97 (advanced malignancy, 28 cases (28.9%)). Overall, advanced malignancy was identified in 162 patients (24.1%). Patients with conditions other than advanced cancer included early stage cancer and benign diseases such as benign polyp, biliary tract benign diseases, pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases such as ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal bleeding lesion, infectious diseases, etc. The median (IQR) of the SARC-F score was 0 (0-2). SARC-F score 0 was seen in 388 cases (57.7%), 1 in 105 (15.6%), 2 in 57 (8.5%), 3 in 38 (5.7%) and ≥4 in 84 (12.5%). The median (IQR) of GS in male and female was 28.9 (23.6-34.2) kg and 17.0 (13.2-20.4) kg. The proportion of decrease in GS in male (<28 kg) and female (<18 kg) was 44.6% (185/415) in male and 56.4% (145/257) in female. 

NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001) ( Figure  2A ). The median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 84) and <4 (n = 588) was 5.87 (3.35-9.41) and 2.48 (1.69-3.73) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2B ). 

In U-G-D (n = 161), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). ( Figure 3A ) In U-G-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 23) and <4 (n = 138) was 5.43 (3.07-11.44) and 2.42 (1.63-3.64) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3B ). 

In U-G-D (n = 161), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). ( Figure 3A ) In U-G-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 23) and <4 (n = 138) was 5.43 (3.07-11.44) and 2.42 (1.63-3.64) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3B ). 

In U-G-D (n = 161), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). ( Figure 3A ) In U-G-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 23) and <4 (n = 138) was 5.43 (3.07-11.44) and 2.42 (1.63-3.64) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3B ). In L-G-D (n = 178), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3C) . In L-G-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 17) and <4 (n = 161) was 6.91 (4.29-8.67) and 2.40 (1.69-4.26) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3D ).

In BP-D (n = 236), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4A ). In BP-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 27) and <4 (n = 209) was 7.0 (3.81-10.13) and 2.65 (1.84-4.01) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4B) .

In L-G-D (n = 178), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3C) . In L-G-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 17) and <4 (n = 161) was 6.91 (4.29-8.67) and 2.40 (1.69-4.26) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3D ).

In BP-D (n = 236), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4A ). In BP-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 27) and <4 (n = 209) was 7.0 (3.81-10.13) and 2.65 (1.84-4.01) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4B ). In L-D (n = 97), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4C ). In L-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 17) and <4 (n = 80) was 3.41 (2.40-7.91) and 2.09 (1.51-3.45) (p = 0.0016) ( Figure 4D ).

The median (IQR) of NLR in advanced cancer (n = 162) was 3.33 (2.25-5.69), and NLR was significantly correlated with the SARC-F score (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5A ). In advanced cancer, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 30) and <4 (n = 132) was 6.14 (3.60-11.75) and 2.91 (2.04-4.43) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5B ). In L-D (n = 97), NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4C ). In L-D, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 17) and <4 (n = 80) was 3.41 (2.40-7.91) and 2.09 (1.51-3.45) (p = 0.0016) ( Figure 4D ).

The median (IQR) of NLR in advanced cancer (n = 162) was 3.33 (2.25-5.69), and NLR was significantly correlated with the SARC-F score (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5A ). In advanced cancer, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 30) and <4 (n = 132) was 6.14 (3.60-11.75) and 2.91 (2.04-4.43) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5B ). 

The median (IQR) of NLR in patients without advanced cancer (n = 510) was 2.49 (1.71-4.0), and NLR significantly had a significant correlation the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5C ). In patients without advanced cancer, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 54) and <4 (n = 456) was 5.48 (3.26-9.07) and 2.32 (1.66-3.51) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5D ).

In males, NLR was significantly correlated with GS (r = −0.33, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6A ). Likewise, in females, NLR was significantly correlated with GS (r = −0.31, p < 0.0001) (Figure 6B) . NLR in patients with decrease in GS (n = 330, median (IQR) = 3.31 (2.23-5.69)) was significantly higher than that without decrease in GS (n = 342, median (IQR) = 2.14 (1.58-3.21) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6C ). 

The median (IQR) of NLR in patients without advanced cancer (n = 510) was 2.49 (1.71-4.0), and NLR significantly had a significant correlation the SARC-F score (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5C ). In patients without advanced cancer, the median (IQR) of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (n = 54) and <4 (n = 456) was 5.48 (3.26-9.07) and 2.32 (1.66-3.51) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5D ).

In males, NLR was significantly correlated with GS (r = −0.33, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6A ). Likewise, in females, NLR was significantly correlated with GS (r = −0.31, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6B ). NLR in patients with decrease in GS (n = 330, median (IQR) = 3.31 (2.23-5.69)) was significantly higher than that without decrease in GS (n = 342, median (IQR) = 2.14 (1.58-3.21) (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6C ). 

In the univariate analysis of factors linking to the SARC-F score, age, ECOG-PS, hemoglobin, serum albumin, NLR, C reactive protein (CRP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significant factors ( Table 2 ). In the multiple regression analysis (multivariate analysis), ECOG-PS and NLR were independent factors linking to the SARC-F score, while age had a trend for significance (p = 0.0686) ( Table 3) . 

In the univariate analysis of factors linking to the SARC-F score, age, ECOG-PS, hemoglobin, serum albumin, NLR, C reactive protein (CRP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significant factors ( Table 2 ). In the multiple regression analysis (multivariate analysis), ECOG-PS and NLR were independent factors linking to the SARC-F score, while age had a trend for significance (p = 0.0686) ( Table 3) . 

Sarcopenia is at the central part of physical frailty, and frailty control is one of the health measure projects promoted by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan [5] . The number of published papers on sarcopenia research has been also rapidly increasing worldwide [5] . In recent years, the Asian and European sarcopenia assessment criteria have been revised one after another, and the use of the SARC-F (i.e., screening method) has been recommended in the revised guidelines [18, 19] . On the other hand, the close relevance in the NLR and prognosis has been reported in various malignancies in recent years. Although the mechanism is still unclear, it has been implied that the cancer-associated inflammatory microenvironment is involved in the process of cancer progression. Neutrophils are involved in tumor promotion, while lymphocytes play a role in anti-tumor immunity. Therefore, elevated NLR may reflect tumor growth and progression, and may be a predictive marker of poor prognosis [26] . NLR is attracting attention as one of the most sensitive indicators of inflammatory status not only in the field of oncology, but also in the fields of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and infectious diseases [27] [28] [29] . Recently, the usefulness of NLR in assessing the severity of COVID-19 infection and determining treatment response has also been reported [30] [31] [32] [33] . NLR is inexpensive to measure, can be measured at any facility, and can be measured frequently in daily practice, making it more valuable and clinically applicable than existing markers that are complicated to measure. However, reports on the relevance in the NLR and SARC-F in patients with G-Ds are scarce. Therefore, the results of this study, which analyzed a large number of cases (n = 672), are significant and worth reporting.

The mean value of NLR in healthy subjects has been reported to be 1.65 [34] , and our median NLR in the present study was 2.65. In patients with G-Ds, NLR may be elevated due to increased inflammation and decreased immune status. The present study showed a good correlation between the NLR and the SARC-F score in the overall cases and all subgroups, and the relationship between GS and the NLR was similar. These results suggest that NLR can be a marker that well reflects the severity of sarcopenia. Although CRP is a marker of acute inflammation, it was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis. While NLR is a complex marker of inflammatory and immune status, and the difference in the nature of CRP and NLR as inflammatory markers may have affected the present results. NLR has been reported to be unaffected by cytokines that affect CRP [35] . ECOG-PS was extracted as an independent factor, and a significant positive correlation was seen in ECOG-PS and the NLR (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). As mentioned earlier, the NLR is easy to measure and correlates well with the SARC-F score and ECOG-PS, so this marker appears to be useful in the daily clinical practice. It is worth mentioning that the strong correlation between ECOG-PS and the SARC-F score (r = 0.79) was found, although it is a little beyond the purpose of this study. The NLR has been reported to be elevated mainly in advanced cancers, and in this study, the median of NLR in advanced cancer cases and non-advanced cancer cases was 3.33 and 2.49 (p < 0.0001), which is consistent with previous reports [21] . The group with BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 showed a tendency to have higher NLR. The median BMI of patients with advanced and non-advanced cancer (21.3 kg/m 2 vs. 22.2 kg/m 2 , p = 0.0160) may also have influenced the current results. Age showed a significant trend in the multivariate analysis. It can be inferred that the development of sarcopenia in G-Ds is a complex interplay of aging and disease pathogenesis. It may also be necessary to evaluate whether primary or secondary factors are more strongly involved in sarcopenia in G-Ds [6] .

It is necessary to point out several limitations of this study besides the fact that this study was a single-center and retrospective observational study. Firstly, as data for skeletal muscle mass in our cohort were missing, it is possible that we were missing cases of sarcopenia that are included among cases with a SARC-F score of less than 4. Secondly, the present cohort included a lot of types of G-Ds. Thirdly, in this study, data at the time of admissions were used, which may lead to bias, especially in patients with infectious diseases where data fluctuate widely. Therefore, meticulous care should be paid on interpreting the study results. Nevertheless, our study results implied that NLR in patients with G-Ds well correlates with the SARC-F score. Finally, we would like to emphasize the usefulness of NLR, a simple marker that can be assessed only by blood tests, in predicting the possibility for sarcopenia by the SARC-F in patients with G-Ds.

Cachexia and Sarcopenia in Older Adults with Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Chronic inflammation and sarcopenia: A regenerative cell therapy perspective

Nutrition and Sarcopenia-What Do We Know? Nutrients

Malnutrition and sarcopenia

Pathophysiology and mechanisms of primary sarcopenia (Review)

Recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment criteria

Nutritional Aspects in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Management of diet in gastrointestinal cancer

Sarcopenia as a predictor of postoperative risk of complications, mortality and length of stay following gastrointestinal oncological surgery

Disease-Related Malnutrition and Sarcopenia as Determinants of Clinical Outcome

Prognostic Impact of the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Advanced Cancers

The Relationship between the SARC-F Score and the Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases

Designing pharmaceutical trials for sarcopenia in frail older adults: EU/US Task Force recommendations

SARC-F: A symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes

SARC-F for Screening of Sarcopenia among Older Adults: A Meta-analysis of Screening Test Accuracy

Validation of the Korean Version of the SARC-F Questionnaire to Assess Sarcopenia: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study

Utility of SARC-F for Assessing Physical Function in Elderly Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment

Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis

Aging and cancer: The role of macrophages and neutrophils

Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Inflammation and colon cancer

Role of infiltrated leucocytes in tumour growth and spread

Cancer Cachexia: Its Mechanism and Clinical Significance

Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in advanced pancreatic cancer

Tumour-associated neutrophils in patients with cancer

Usefulness of the neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity of coronary artery disease: A Gensini score assessment

The relationship between neutrophil lymphocyte ratio with urinary protein and albumin excretion in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes

Neutrophil/lymphocyte and C-reactive protein/mean platelet volume ratios in differentiating between viral and bacterial pneumonias and diagnosing early complications in children

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis

Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Determines Clinical Efficacy of Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients with COVID-19

Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Potential immune-inflammatory parameters to identify severe and fatal forms of COVID-19

What is the normal value of the neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio?

Characterization of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a measure of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis

We would like to thank the medical staff of the department for their cooperation in the clinical data collection.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 

Informed Consent Statement: Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.

The data are not publicly available due to personal information of our study cohort.