key: cord-0728323-qxxizimr authors: Biddell, Caitlin B.; Kasow, Kimberly A.; Killela, Mary K.; Page, Kristin M.; Wheeler, Stephanie B.; Drier, Sarah W.; Kelly, Matthew S.; Robles, Joanna M.; Spees, Lisa P. title: Understanding the financial and psychological impact of employment disruption among caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients: a mixed methods analysis date: 2022-02-07 journal: Support Care Cancer DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06883-0 sha: 9437d017ef0ec43d5d612886215303a53fbe2c04 doc_id: 728323 cord_uid: qxxizimr PURPOSE: Pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) confers a substantial financial burden onto patients’ families. In addition to high direct medical costs, HSCTs typically require at least one caregiver to take time away from work or other responsibilities, often leading to reduced household income. Using mixed methods, we sought to understand the impact of pediatric HSCT on caregiver employment and financial need. METHODS: We surveyed caregivers of living pediatric patients who underwent HSCT at one of two southeastern transplant centers between 2012 and 2018 (N = 95). We then interviewed a subset of caregivers (N = 18) to understand whether and how employment disruption contributed to financial distress. RESULTS: Among caregivers surveyed, the majority of household wage earners changed their work schedules to attend medical appointments and missed workdays. This resulted in income loss for 87% of families, with 31% experiencing an income reduction of over 50%. Qualitative interviews pointed to four emergent themes: (1) employment disruption exacerbated existing financial challenges; (2) parental division of labor between caregiving and providing financially led to heightened psychological distress; (3) existing employment leave and protection resources were essential but not sufficient; and (4) the ability to work remotely and having a supportive employer facilitated employment maintenance throughout the HSCT process. CONCLUSION: Expanded employment protections and access to accommodations are needed to limit the impact of HSCT on household income, health insurance, and financial hardship. Additionally, interventions are needed to ensure caregivers are equipped with the information necessary to navigate conversations with employers and prepare for the financial and psychological reality of employment disruption. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06883-0. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasingly performed in pediatric patients with a range of lifethreatening illnesses, including hematologic malignancies, genetic and metabolic disorders, and immunodeficiencies and nonmalignant diseases such as primary immunodeficiencies and hemoglobinopathies, among others [1] . Potentially curative, HSCT is a medically intensive process, with direct medical costs for pediatric allogeneic and autologous transplants averaging $585,300 and $244,337, respectively, at 100-day follow-up [2] . As healthcare costs are increasingly passed to insured patients [3] , pediatric HSCTs can confer a substantial financial burden onto families [4] . Additionally, HSCTs require prolonged hospitalizations, ranging from a mean of 26 days for autologous to 54 days for allogeneic transplants [2] , which often require caregivers to take time away from work [4, 5] . Further, following patient discharge, caregivers must manage intensive outpatient follow-up care [6, 7] . Though the extent of employment disruption may depend on employment type and accommodations [8] [9] [10] , it is consistently associated with financial and psychological burden among caregivers of adults with cancer and other chronic illnesses [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] . Despite the unique and substantial demands faced by caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients, little is known about the emotional and financial costs associated with employment disruption in this population. To date, a single study has described the experience of financial hardship, or financial toxicity, among families of pediatric HSCT recipients during the first year post-transplant [4] . While this study found that substantial income loss (> 40%) was a primary contributor to financial distress, it used percent of annual income lost as the sole indicator of employment disruption. To comprehensively describe the long-term and nuanced impact of employment disruption on financial toxicity in this population, we conducted a mixed methods analysis of caregivers of children who underwent allogeneic or autologous HSCT in the prior 2 to 8 years. The objective of this study was to describe the financial needs of caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients. Specifically, we used quantitative survey data and qualitative interview data to understand the impact of pediatric HSCT on caregiver employment and the relationship between employment disruption and financial need. Additionally, we sought to describe the resources used by caregivers to mitigate employment disruption and identify gaps in available resources. This study was conducted between May 2020 and January 2021. Eligible participants were caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients (< 18 years of age at the time of transplant) who underwent allogeneic or autologous HSCT between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, at one of two Southeastern academic medical centers. Despite these transplant centers being located in adjacent cities, the programs differ in terms of transplant center size and the patient populations served, resulting in a cohort of participants from diverse backgrounds and experiences. We excluded caregivers of deceased patients or patients residing outside of the USA. Caregiver contact information and patient clinical information (e.g., HSCT date) were collected from patients' electronic health records. Of the 260 caregivers approached for the study, 38% completed the survey electronically (N = 49) or by phone (N = 50). Four participants were excluded due to not responding to the employment section of the survey for a final sample of N = 95 and a response rate of 36.5%. Clinical characteristics (i.e., sex, HSCT type, HSCT year, diagnosis, graft versus host disease) of patients did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents based on nonsignificant (p > 0.05) chi-squared test results. The institutional review boards at both institutions approved the study (UNC-CH IRB#19-0490). Eligible caregivers were sent the electronic survey by email. After four email reminders, the remaining caregivers were contacted by phone. Data was recorded, deidentified, and managed using REDCap, an electronic data capture tool [16] . After caregivers consented to participation, the survey collected information on the family's sociodemographic characteristics, financial toxicity, and financial resources used (Online Resource 1). Financial toxicity was measured using an adapted patient-reported outcome measure, the COST Score, which has been validated in adult patients with cancer (range: 0-44; < 22 indicates high financial toxicity) [17] . We pilot tested the survey with two caregivers to ensure questions appropriately captured domains of interest. Respondents were given a $20 Amazon gift card for their time. The survey asked participants to describe the impact of their child's HSCT on the employment of all wage earners in the family. For caregivers reporting more than one wage earner, they were asked to categorize them as primary and secondary. Employment-related survey questions were adapted from questions in the published literature investigating employment disruption in adult patients with cancer [18] [19] [20] . Upon survey completion, respondents indicated whether they would be willing to participate in a follow-up phone interview. During 30-to 60-minute semi-structured interviews, a member of our research team (SD) asked caregivers to describe the medical (e.g., insurance bills) and nonmedical (e.g., reduced income) financial impact of HSCT, discuss financial resources used, and provide recommendations for reducing financial challenges of pediatric HSCT caregivers moving forward. Caregivers with high financial toxicity (COST score < 22) were prioritized for interviews. Participants were given another $50 gift card for interview completion. We conducted interviews until reaching thematic saturation, and interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interview transcripts were organized and analyzed using Dedoose (version 9.0.15) [21]. Using directed content analysis [22] , a team of two coders (CBB, LPS) created a coding scheme with domains informed by a conceptual model of financial toxicity in pediatric oncology [23] . This model explores the financial impact of a childhood cancer diagnosis on material financial hardship, health-related coping behaviors, and psychological distress. Subcodes were deductively informed by literature on financial toxicity [24] [25] [26] [27] . Inductive codes emerged during the iterative coding of the interviews. Resources and recommendations were coded by level of influence using the socio-ecological framework (i.e., policy, community, organization, interpersonal, individual) [28] . All coders (CBB, LPS, MKK) independently coded and compared two transcripts to confirm codes were applied systematically. After reaching consensus, additional transcripts were coded independently. Coded excerpts were analyzed to identify themes and subthemes. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) was used to guide the reporting of methods and results [29] . We compared and contrasted the qualitative and quantitative findings in line with a convergent mixed methods study design [30] . The qualitative findings supplemented the quantitative survey results by adding a narrative understanding of employment disruption and identifying recommendations to minimize the impact of pediatric HSCT on caregiver employment. The average age of HSCT recipients was 7.6 years, and the median time from HSCT was 4 years (Online Resource 2). Of the 95 survey respondents, the majority of caregivers reported being mothers of the HSCT recipient (77%) and married (79%). When asked to report their 2019 household income, 21% reported making less than $50,000, 33% between $50,000 and $99,000, and 43% over $100,000 (3% did not disclose). The majority of caregivers reported that their child was privately insured at transplant (68%), followed by Medicaid (33%) and Tricare (9%). COST scores ranged from 0 (high financial toxicity) to 41 (low financial toxicity), with a median of 17 and interquartile range (IQR) of 9-28 ( Table 1) . The median COST score of the 18 interview participants was 12 . All caregivers interviewed were married but otherwise shared similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to the survey sample (Table 1 , Online Resource 2). Forty-eight survey respondents reported living in a single-earner household, and the remaining 47 respondents reported two or more wage earners. Over 80% reported that the sole or primary wage earner in their household was employed full time ( Table 2 ). In the 12 months following HSCT, caregivers in single-earner households commonly reported that the sole wage earner changed their work schedule to attend medical appointments (60%) and reduced work hours (40%). In dual-earner households, caregivers reported that both primary and secondary wage earners changed their work schedules to attend medical appointments (68%, 74%, respectively) and reduced work hours overall (49%, 54%, respectively). Missed days of work during the year following HSCT were reported by the majority of employed wage earners; sole wage earners missed a median (IQR) of 25 days, and in dualearner households, primary wage earners missed a median (IQR) of 23 (11-100) days, and secondary wage earners missed a median (IQR) of 23 (10-180) days (Table 2) . Several employment trajectories emerged from the qualitative interviews. The most common trajectory described was among families with both parents working and contributing to household income prior to the transplant. One parent, generally the secondary wage earner, left their job or severely reduced hours, some preemptively leading up to the transplant, and others after exhausting leave resources; the primary wage earner continued working and would take sporadic leave for appointments. In contrast, among families with only one wage earner prior to transplant, the non-wage-earning parent typically took on primary caregiving responsibilities for the HSCT recipient, and the other parent continued in their employment, taking time off as needed. Employment disruption commonly extended beyond the immediate transplant period. Several interviewees explained that the ongoing caregiving responsibilities precluded them from returning to work for several years following the transplant. Across the different employment trajectories Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of survey and interview participants COST, COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation a Among survey participants who were willing to be interviewed, we prioritized those with the lowest COST scores (i.e., participants who experienced high financial toxicity) b Participants reported their marital status, household size, and employment status during February 2020, prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic c Participants reported their annual income from 2019, prior to the year that the survey was conducted d Participants could select multiple types of insurance, so sum does not add up to total participants described, four major themes emerged (see Table 3 for representative quotations). These themes chronologically describe the financial and psychological consequences of employment disruption, followed by an assessment of policy-and employer-level resources to ameliorate this disruption. Employment disruption following HSCT led to income loss for most families surveyed (87%), with 31% of families experiencing an income reduction of over 50% and an additional 17% experiencing a 25-50% reduction. Interviewees described financial challenges being exacerbated by the simultaneous experience of income loss, large medical bills, and additional HSCT-related household expenses. As a result, interviewees described using savings and retirement funds to pay household bills after losing one parent's income (Table 3 ). In addition to income loss, privately insured families worried about maintaining employer-based health insurance. Though most interviewees were able to keep their child on the employer-sponsored health insurance of the parent who continued working, the threat of insurance loss loomed. The psychological impact of financial distress also emerged as an important, and related, dimension of employment disruption. Gendered social norms influenced caregiving responsibilities; specifically, male caregivers, who most commonly maintained employment and made up 87% of wage earners in single-earner households and 59% of primary wage earners in dual-earner households (Table 2) , felt pressure to provide financially and experienced psychological distress when they felt they could not provide sufficiently. In contrast, female caregivers felt the pressure of being the primary caregiver for the HSCT recipient, which often involved substantial emotional labor as well (Table 3) . Several families discussed that this division of labor led to distress, bred resentment, and harmed their partnerships: "I felt like I was working to pay the medical bills that the insurance was not paying…that affected our marriage because we were not able to spend time as a couple…it really did both financially and emotionally touch on every aspect of our lives." (Participant #33) Major theme #3: Existing employment leave and protection resources were essential but not sufficient Among employed wage earners (sole, dual primary, and dual secondary) who reported missing work during the year following HSCT, resources used included paid vacation (60%, 77%, 54%, respectively), paid sick leave (51%, 77%, 57%), FMLA (43%, 54%, 38%), and unpaid leave (37%, 34%, 27%). Between 14 and 20% of wage earners reported not having any resources available for work absences (Table 4) . While job protection policies, such as FMLA and paid leave, including donated sick leave, were emphasized in both surveys and interviews, the interviews illustrated that the primary challenge with FMLA and paid leave is that they were finite. Given the intensive nature of HSCT, even 12 weeks of job protection (through FMLA) was not sufficient to cover staying in the hospital with the HSCT recipient for up to 3 months, often followed by several years of intensive outpatient follow-up care (Table 3) . Similarly, the amount of paid vacation and sick leave available was widely variable across employers. Though interviewed caregivers almost universally described using paid leave when available, only those who had access to coworkers willing to donate their leave or held senior positions with highly flexible paid leave could take substantial time off for caregiving responsibilities. However, paid leave was highlighted as an important resource for the secondary caregiver to attend important appointments or provide intermittent relief to the primary caregiver. Though the majority of interviewees were employed in traditional work settings qualifying under FMLA and offering some paid leave, several interviewees described nontraditional work settings, such as being self-employed. The lack of benefits and protections in these arrangements exacerbated the financial impact of employment disruption: "If he doesn't work, he doesn't get paid. There's no vacation, no holiday, no nothing." (Participant #237). The majority of employed wage earners in both single-earner households (71%) and dual-earner households (68% primary, 64% secondary) discussed their child's transplant and its impact on their work with their employer or the human resources department. Conversely, most wage earners did not discuss employment with their child's clinician (Table 4 ). Sole wage earners in single-earner households and primary wage earners in dual-earner households most commonly reported that their employer offered a flexible work schedule (60%, 56%, respectively), discussed different leave options (52%, 46%), and provided additional paid time off (43%, 32%) ( Table 4 ). In interviews, participants with jobs amenable to remote work described working from the hospital while staying with their child. Though working remotely was often paired with a reduction in hours, or increased scheduling flexibility, it meant that caregivers were not forced to exhaust their FMLA while in the hospital. Several interviewees pointed to the ability to work remotely as the primary reason that they were able to maintain employment throughout the HSCT process (Table 3) . Supportive employers were described as being flexible about scheduling and time off, knowledgeable about employer-sponsored health insurance and other resources available, and empathetic to the family's situation. Some interviewees even described employers going out of their way to help the family financially, by personally raising funds or upgrading the family's health insurance plan to reduce out-of-pocket costs. "I work for a fabulous company…They did a fundraiser, and they raised [money] for us." (Participant #211) In contrast, other interviewees described negative employer-employee relationships characterized by indifference or a lack of empathy or concern, which influenced their ability to maintain employment. "I would say that the human resources at our places of employment were-I'm not sayin' they weren't concerned, but they…I don't know whether they went out of their way to help or throw other options out there… other than just get you on the Family Medical Leave Act." (Participant #23) The majority of caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients experienced employment disruption during the transplant period and extending into the years following HSCT. The loss of income and potential loss of health insurance associated with this disruption contributed to financial hardship and distress among families of pediatric HSCT recipients. In our cohort, existing employment protections were insufficient for the majority of caregivers to maintain employment throughout HSCT. However, employment accommodations, such as the ability to work remotely, gave caregivers more flexibility to maintain employment during the transplant period. Our findings regarding the prevalence of employment disruption are largely in line with the only prior study of this topic among families of pediatric HSCT recipients [4] . A greater proportion of our sample reported substantial income loss (> 50% of annual income), which may be, in part, explained by our longer follow-up period following HSCT (caregivers of patients who underwent HSCT in the prior 2 to 8 years included). Substantial employment disruption has also been previously reported among working-age caregivers of dependent pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer [31] [32] [33] . Consistent among this and prior studies is the association between employment disruption and financial burden [4, 31, 34] , which has also been documented extensively in the adult cancer and HSCT populations [35, 36] . This suggests the need for comprehensive solutions addressing the employment challenges faced by all caregivers in their productive working years, regardless of the patient's diagnosis or treatment regimen. However, for caregivers of pediatric patients undergoing HSCT, these resources may be even more essential due to the high costs and extended treatment and recovery periods required. Understanding employment outcomes and related challenges in caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients is a critical first step toward developing programmatic and policy interventions to meet caregiver employment needs and mitigate the long-term financial burden. To date, the unmet supportive care, psychological, and informational needs of caregivers have been well documented as they relate to medical caregiving responsibilities [37] [38] [39] [40] . However, less attention has been paid to the resource and informational needs stemming from employment and financial disruption. Our findings point to the limitations of existing workplace protections and accommodations in the context of pediatric HSCT. Though FMLA provides job protection through 12 weeks of unpaid time off, caregivers only qualify if they meet criteria related to hours worked and are working at a firm with more than 50 employees [10, 41] . Additionally, 12 weeks may not be sufficient to accommodate the prolonged hospitalization and intensive outpatient follow-up care associated with HSCT. Workplace accommodations, such as flexible scheduling arrangements and remote work, were identified in our analysis as critical to balancing employment and caregiving responsibilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which grants reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, does not apply to caregivers [10, 42] . Policies are needed to ensure caregivers, particularly caregivers of pediatric patients undergoing intensive procedures such as HSCT, have equitable access to workplace accommodations and protections [43] . Such policy changes would also likely benefit caregivers of pediatric and AYA patients with cancer undergoing other intensive treatment regimens. In the meantime, to ensure caregivers can best utilize all available employment protections, caregivers must be informed about both their employment-related needs and their rights to existing protections in order to advocate for themselves in the workplace. Equipping caregivers with this information in preparation for conversations with employers would increase the likelihood that caregivers are able to take advantage of all available accommodations and protections, despite employerrelated factors. To our knowledge, no hospital-based interventions addressing the employment and financial needs of pediatric HSCT caregivers have been developed to date. However, several evidence-based interventions, specifically web-based applications, have been developed to provide HSCT caregivers with real-time patient-specific clinical information during the transplant period [44, 45] . Future work could expand on these applications to include information related to employment and financial planning, navigating conversations with employers, and legally mandated protections and accommodations. These findings must be viewed in the context of several limitations. The sample for the quantitative survey was relatively small, though in line with prior studies in this population [4] , and had a response rate of 36.5%. This may have imposed selection bias if caregivers responding to the survey experienced more extreme financial and employment disruption. However, it is also possible that caregivers experiencing severe financial consequences post-transplant did not have the capacity to complete the survey, thus biasing results in the opposite direction. Furthermore, data collection occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which may have also contributed to our relatively low survey response rate. Second, results are subject to recall bias, given that we included caregivers of patients who were between 2 and 8 years post-HSCT. This was necessitated, however, by our belief in the importance of capturing the long-term impacts of HSCT on employment and finances. Lastly, this mixed methods analysis was descriptive in nature and did not examine predictors of employment disruption. Future work should consider patient, caregiver, and employment characteristics in examining the multilevel contributors to employment outcomes in this population. In summary, employment disruption and resulting income loss were experienced by the majority of caregivers of pediatric HSCT recipients, both during the transplant period and in the years after HSCT, in two academic transplant centers in central North Carolina. Expanded employment protections and access to accommodations are needed to limit the impact of HSCT on household income, health insurance, and financial hardship. Additionally, interventions are needed to ensure caregivers are equipped with the information necessary to navigate conversations with employers and prepare for the financial and psychological reality of employment disruption. Pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant The cost of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in the United States Increases in cost-sharing payments continue to outpace wage growth Prevalence and impact of financial hardship among New England pediatric stem cell transplantation families Financial hardship after hematopoietic cell transplantation: lack of impact on survival Group-based trajectory modeling of distress and well-being among caregivers of children undergoing hematopoetic stem cell transplant Psychological distress and psychiatric diagnoses among primary caregivers of children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: an examination of prevalence, correlates, and racial/ethnic differences Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors Economic burden associated with cancer caregiving Cancer survivorship and employment: intersection of oral agents, changing workforce dynamics, and employers' perspectives Employment outcomes, financial burden, anxiety, and depression among caregivers of African American cancer survivors Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers The multidimensional burden of informal caregivers in primary malignant brain tumor Work productivity and health of informal caregivers of persons with advanced cancer Caregiver experience during advanced chronic illness and last year of life Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) A UK survey of the impact of cancer on employment The impact of cancer diagnosis on employment: is there a difference between rural and urban populations? Dedoose version 9.0.15, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data Three approaches to qualitative content analysis A conceptual model of financial toxicity in pediatric oncology A theoretical model of financial burden after cancer diagnosis Financial hardships experienced by cancer survivors: a systematic review Multilevel determinants of financial toxicity in breast cancer care: perspectives of healthcare professionals and Latina survivors It still affects our economic situation": long-term economic burden of breast cancer and lymphedema Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups A concise introduction to mixed methods research Financial burden of pediatric cancer for patients and their families Economic impact of advanced pediatric cancer on families Facilitators and barriers to return to work and meet financial needs in parents of children with cancer The hidden impact of childhood cancer on the family: a multi-institutional study from Singapore Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer Relationship between paid leave, financial burden, and patient-reported outcomes among employed patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation Barriers to psychological care among primary caregivers of children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Identifying unmet informational needs in the inpatient setting to increase patient and caregiver engagement in the context of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation The need to support caregivers during pediatric bone marrow transplantation (BMT): a case report Supporting caregivers during hematopoietic cell transplantation for children with primary immunodeficiency disorders Fact Sheet #28A: Employee Protections under the Family and Medical Leave Act Protecting family caregivers from employment discrimination BMT Roadmap: a user-centered design health information technology tool to promote patient-centered care in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation Development of a health-related website for parents of children receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant: HSCT-CHESS Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations We are grateful to all of the caregivers who participated in this study. We would also like to acknowledge Savannah Coble, Andrew Sharf, Richard Vinesett, Walter Armstrong, Laura Danku, Sloan Kojis, Sandi Bream, and Christina Conlin for their assistance in various phases of the data collection process. Competing interests SBW has received funding paid to her institution from the Pfizer Foundation. JMR serves as a volunteer medical advisory board member for the nonprofit organization, The Sumaira Foundation for Neuromyelitis Optica. All other authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose. The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00520-022-06883-0.Author contribution All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Funding was acquired by Lisa Spees and Kimberly Kasow. Data collection and analysis were performed by Caitlin Biddell, Lisa Spees, Sarah Drier, and Mary Killela. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Caitlin Biddell, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. . NIH did not have any role in the study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the report for publication. The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to their confidential nature.Code availability Not applicable. The study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Boards at both institutions (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Duke University) (UNC-CH IRB#19-0490). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.