key: cord-0727752-1bfr9she
authors: Hulikal, Narendra; Kumar, Singaram Nagesh; Gopinath, Kodaganuru S.
title: Surgery for Cancer in the Wake of Second and Future Waves! Challenges and Opportunities in the Indian Context
date: 2021-07-30
journal: Indian J Surg Oncol
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01392-8
sha: f5484f3a312c5a621f4caffea5fef55a1c9f3f48
doc_id: 727752
cord_uid: 1bfr9she

The pandemic situation created by newly discovered severe acute respiratory disease corona virus 2019 has thrown up many challenges to surgical fraternity across world. All surgeons particularly cancer surgeons are facing dilemmas not only in managing patients but also in appropriate personal as well as employee’s health protection as well. Since the pandemic is not expected to recede unless it affects a considerable proportion of population or up to 60% of population is vaccinated, we need to be aware of prevailing best practices. This is important in ensuring continuity of care for cancer patients as well as to limit the consequences of one getting infected with the COVID-19. This review article focuses on the current challenges and the ways to mitigate them.

The pandemic situation created by newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome corona-2 virus (SARS Cov-2) disease 2019 has severely impacted all spheres of life including medical care. The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in India was reported from Kerala in late January last year [1] , followed soon by first wave of pandemic, reaching nearly 100,000 infections per day at peak, receding by late September after claiming 150,000 lives [2] . Several measures including months of lockdown and gradual opening may have succeeded in limiting the final numbers, though the economic consequences were severe. The current wave which started in late March is proving to be more dangerous as the nation seems to be underprepared. All the epidemiologists are of the view that the pandemic will not end unless a substantial population is vaccinated, or the population acquires a reasonable degree of herd immunity through natural infection. In this regard planning to carry on with the routine medical care for non-COVID-19 diseases especially cancer becomes important. The cocktail of COVID in cancer patient throws up many challenges to a clinician.

Incidence of COVID-19 in cancer patients is variable, most data suggesting 1-8% with highest risk among hematologic and lung cancers [3, 4] . Centre for Disease Control (CDC), USA, considers cancer as one of established risk factor for severe COVID-19 but data is weak to say the risk is same across all cancers. Patients with advanced age, progressive disease and comorbidities are at increased risk of death [4] . Though international guidelines vary regarding routine COVID testing, generally testing is advisable given the community prevalence of the infection in India (> 10% PCR positivity in a community), for time sensitive surgeries and procedures involving aerosol generation. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends testing only in the presence of COVID symptoms [5] , whereas Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends routine testing for patients undergoing immunosuppressive procedures like chemotherapy [6] . As antigen tests carry low sensitivity, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Further, repeat testing is not needed if infected in the past 3 months as there is less chance of active infection, even if tested positive.

The actual management of COVID-19 infection will not differ from non-cancer patients and available data suggest that patient with cancer who develop COVID-19 are not necessarily at increased risk of hypercoagulable state [7] . The need for ventilatory support in any cancer patient with advanced stages or comorbidity for severe COVID infection carries a grim prognosis and needs a proactive discussion about goals of care with patient relatives [8, 9] .

Multidisciplinary care of cancer when a patient tests positive poses unique challenge as it involves ethical, consistent, and transparent decision-making process involving all frontline stakeholders [10] . As of September 2020, ASCO guidelines recommended that until more definitive information is available, decision about withholding anti-cancer treatment should be based on clinical risk benefit analysis that considers the risk of interrupting cancer treatment versus yet poorly defined risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patient receiving active cancer treatment. Further, when treatment decisions are made, such patients should be treated in specific areas with adequate COVID care facilities and dedicated staff [11] . The risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality may be increased in patients with COVID, and decision to perform urgent or emergent surgery must balance this risk against the risk of delaying or avoiding the planned procedure. Procedures that are not time sensitive should not be performed in symptomatic COVID patients, who are suspected of having COVID-19 or who are likely to be still infected after having had COVID-19. One study showed that patients who underwent surgery within 7 weeks after diagnosis of COVID had higher 30-day mortality compared to those who underwent surgery after 7 weeks with odd's ratio of 4:1.5. Even after 7 weeks, persistence of symptoms was associated with higher mortality and hence wherever possible, surgery can be delayed beyond 7 weeks [12] . According to ASCO for anti-cancer treatment to start in immunocompromised patients, one has to wait for 20 days and 10 days for non-immunocompromised patients with two negative COVID tests, more than 24 h apart along with absence of symptoms like cough and fever (in the absence of any antipyretic medication). Persistent viral shedding after recovery has several implications such as infectivity, continued infection control precautions, delay in investigations, and treatment. For most patients, prolonged or recurrent viral RNA detection does not necessarily indicate prolonged infection; isolation of infectious virus from upper respiratory tract specimen more than 10 days after onset of illness has rarely been documented in an asymptomatic patient with non-severe infection. It is recommended not to delay cancer procedures or surgeries if patient is persistently COVID-19-positive based on cycle threshold as measured by RTPCR [13] . Though It is established well that patient with active cancer are at increased risk for severe COVID disease and mortality, whether cancer survivors who have completed treatment are at increased risk for COVID-19 or its complications is still unclear. Other emerging issue at the time of writing this article is challenge of managing post-COVID complications including mucor mycosis in immunocompromised patients including cancer patients.

Coming to cancer care for a patient who has no COVID infection, the world is not the same anymore. Oncologists must balance the risk of delaying cancer treatment versus risk of SARS Cov-2 exposure and its complications while navigating with limited health care resources. In order to provide safe care, one can follow general guidelines given by CDC and ASCO and several associations including Indian Association of Surgical Oncology [14] . Generally, ASCO recommends segregating patients based on their COVID test status to avoid contact with symptomatic COVID patients; mandatory universal wearing of face mask, following a strict hand washing protocol, to cancel all routine screening and follow-up visits and extending the time between follow-up visits. Pre-visit COVID screening via telephone calls or digital platforms 48 to 72 h before scheduled appointment for any history of COVID exposure in the past 14 days or any COVID symptoms in the preceding 10 days is highly recommended [15] . Majority of routine surveillance consultations can be done with teleconsultations following the guidelines issued by erstwhile Medical council of India [16] . Screening clinics should be developed to allow for patient with symptoms to be evaluated. Routine cancer screening and diagnostic clinics should be based on the status of COVID-19 in that community. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends postponing screening clinics to decrease the burden on health care system and to preserve the resources. Screening clinic can be restarted once the infection rate comes down in the community.

Though at present, there is no evidence that COVID-19 interferes with or influences the diagnosis and staging of cancer, it is important to limit the number of staging procedures to decrease number of visits. There is an evolving situation that COVID-19 vaccination can cause axillary and supraclavicular adenopathy which may interfere with cancer staging and one needs to be cautious in reporting and interpreting these findings. A screening mammogram may be planned either before first dose of vaccination or 4 to 6 weeks following the second dose [17] . Though a delay in cancer treatment can result in adverse oncologic outcomes depending on cancer type and stage, one must weigh the risk and benefit given the current pandemic situation in each community. One study revealed that a delay of 4 weeks was associated with increased mortality across surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for bladder, breast, colon, head, and neck including nasopharyngeal, cervical, and non-small cell lung cancers [18] . Some of the online tools such as oncCovid can help clinicians to estimate the risk of delaying treatment for individual patient. It can give a reasonable estimate of 5-year mortality, cancer-specific mortality, hazard ratios of treatment delays for various intervals and risk of developing and dying from COVID-19 over 6 months period [19] .

Since many cancer surgeries including some palliative procedures are time sensitive need special mention. Treatment of many cancers such as brain tumors, cancers of breast, colon, stomach, pancreas, liver, bladder, kidney, and lung cannot wait for 2 to 3 months as patients would be deprived of significant surgical benefit [20] . In some like breast, prostate, and rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy may be used as a means of delaying surgery. In rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy can be safely followed neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal treatment in breast cancer and neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in risk prostate cancer can be employed [21] . Similarly, radiotherapy can be used for many of oral cancers and cancers of upper aero digestive tract including esophagus. When such decisions are made risk of tumour progression with delay in definitive surgery should be weighed against the potential added burden on hospital resources, case complexity and risk of COVID-19 exposure. However, neoadjuvant therapy that is immunosuppressive or requires frequent clinic visit has potential incremental risk. The rationale for delaying surgeries is conservation of resources, limitation of viral spread, and minimizing postoperative infection and mortality [22] . Non-emergent, non-time-sensitive surgeries can be resumed if there is downward trend of community infection rate; resources are available, where testing of patient and staffs is adequate. One of the useful model could be on the lines of American College of Surgeons who endorse use of cross discipline surgical prioritization system called "Medically-Necessary, Time-Sensitive Procedures" (MeNST) score which is calculated for each case over 21 distinct items [23] . One more approach could be conceptual approach to decision-making regarding timing cancer treatment which attempts to balance the risk of progression with risk of significant morbidity from COVID-19. In this approach, owing to low risk of progression, it may be safer to delay treatment for more than 3 months for certain cancers like non-melanoma skin cancer or hormone receptor positive her-2 negative early breast cancer regardless of age. Some of the cancers with intermediate risk of progression, a delay of approximately 3 months, may be acceptable in individuals less than 50 years old and older with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (can be on hormonal treatment), low-risk melanoma, and colon cancer without impending obstruction. For certain cancers with high risk of progression, ideally there should be no delay in treatment for individuals under the age of 70. This category includes patients with more than 2 cm lung mass, colon cancer with imminent obstruction, type 2 endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, pancreatic, ovary, liver malignancy, high-risk non-muscle invasive, and muscle invasive bladder cancer who are not eligible for chemotherapy, early testicular cancer, invasive penile cancer, and patients who completed preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer [24] [25] [26] . Again, a note should be made that most of these frame works are expert opinion than evidence-based recommendations. Data from National Cancer Database (NCDB) reveals that for common solid tumors, such as cancers of breast, prostate, lung, and colon, shorter time to initiation of treatment is associated with lower mortality. In addition to potentially altering treatment protocols, other actions suggested to increase the safety of managing oncologic care during pandemic include screening for COVID-19, limiting exposure to contacts on treatment, minimizing non-essential visits, restricting visitors, and increased engagement in telemedicine. COVID-19 pandemic has put telemedicine into limelight because it is accessed by people directly from home, reduces viral transmission, and safeguards patient and staff. Some of the challenges include data privacy, medical liability access to devises, difficulty in understanding how to use telemedicine equipment, incompleteness of physical examination, decreased ability to participate in clinical trials, and hampered resident training and difficulties in coordinating care. Accumulating data support mostly favorable outcomes. Appropriate and agile implementation of a virtual care delivery system successfully enabled the continuity of outpatient cancer care delivery during pandemic [27, 28] .

The impact of COVID-19 on surgical training of oncological residents is many folds. In many of the public sector hospitals, workforce has been diverted from their field of specialization to care of COVID-19 patients, thereby leading to compromises in speciality training. Multiple lockdowns have also resulted in reduction in patient volume leading to non-uniform effects across hospitals. Even the mode of conduct of exams has been modified to suit the new norm. At the time of writing this article, the national board of examinations has extended the period of training by 3 months and national eligibility entrance test for admission to first year broad and super speciality courses have been indefinitely delayed [29, 30] . All these would have certain impact on over all cancer care, the magnitude of which is unknown at this time. The role of clinical trials in transforming cancer care is beyond doubt. The conduct of clinical trials is often seamlessly integrated into routine oncology care offering eligible patients additional treatment options. The COVID-19 pandemic has become the major barrier for new patient recruitment as well as following up with the enrolled patients [31] . The funding opportunities for new projects have also been severely hit across globe.

The emergence of vaccines for COVID-19 is a boon, though the practicality of immunizing considerable population to achieve herd immunity is challenging in the Indian context. If everything goes according to estimates as given by the government, we may expect vaccination of at least 50-60% of population by this year end. All individuals with active or prior cancer who are eligible for vaccination according to local allocation priorities should be advised by oncologists to get vaccinated. Although immunogenicity is attenuated, still vaccination is recommended in immunocompromised population. There is no reliable way to find whether vaccine has elicited protective immune response and CDC specifically recommend against the antibody testing to asses post vaccination immunity. Data are not currently available to establish vaccine safety and efficacy in patient with immunocompromised conditions such as cancer or immunosuppressive treatment.

First confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in India: a case report

SARS-CoV-2 sero-prevalence among general population and healthcare workers in India

Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China

Prevalence and outcome of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: a national veterans affairs study

Managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO multidisciplinary expert consensus

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease

Incidence of thrombosis and hemorrhage in hospitalized cancer patients with Covid-19

Managing cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: agility and collaboration toward a common goal

The importance of addressing advance care planning and decisions about do-notresuscitate orders during novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19)

Treating the SARS-CoV-2-positive patient with cancer: a proposal for a pragmatic and transparent ethical process

A systematic review and meta-analysis: the effect of active cancer treatment on severity of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 and timing of elective surgery

Case study: prolonged infectious SARS-CoV-2 shedding from an asymptomatic immunocompromised individual with cancer

Safety at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: how to keep our oncology patients and healthcare workers safe

Multidisciplinary recommendations regarding post-vaccine adenopathy and radiologic imaging

Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis

Integrated survival estimates for cancer treatment delay among adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

Executive Committee at Memorial Sloan Kettering (2020) Cancer Surgery and COVID19

Taking a second look at neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for the treatment of early stage estrogen receptor positive breast cancer during the COVID-19 outbreak

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

A critical appraisal of the American College of Surgeons Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive Procedures (MeNTS) scoring system, urology consensus recommendations and individual surgeon case prioritization for resumption of elective urological surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

A war on two fronts: cancer care in the time of COVID-19

Cancer, COVID-19 and the precautionary principle: prioritizing treatment during a global pandemic

Surgical oncologists and the COVID-19 pandemic: guiding cancer patients effectively through turbulence and change

Implementation and outcomes of virtual care across a tertiary cancer centre during COVID-19

Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19

/ viewN otice. php? NBE= T3NNN VRoc0 9xUW5 kTHhL MXpJZ FFRdz 09

Clinical characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with haematological diseases: a retrospective case study in four hospitals in Italy

The day after COVID-19-time to rethink oncology clinical research