key: cord-0723872-nzww42bh
authors: Fraser, Anne; McNeill, Rob; Robinson, Jackie
title: Cancer care in a time of COVID: lung cancer patient’s experience of telehealth and connectedness
date: 2021-10-04
journal: Support Care Cancer
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06528-8
sha: 6dcf500238ecab1d732d920e01c114df608f8578
doc_id: 723872
cord_uid: nzww42bh

OBJECTIVE: To explore lung cancer patient’s experiences of telehealth during COVID-19 restrictions. METHODS: Thirty patients with lung cancer were recruited. Data was collected using a qualitative exploratory design with semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were thematically coded using NVivo software. RESULTS: Five key themes were identified: maintaining resilience, participants acknowledged that they were self-reliant prior to their diagnosis and that the sense of their own internal capabilities was a source of comfort for them; importance of pre-established relationships with healthcare professionals, the sense of connection established prior to the telehealth consultation supported participants to engage with healthcare professionals where the need for connectedness was amplified by a sense of isolation; seeking help, participants sought help from services that they perceived as being “expert”; convenience, factors such as costs and saving time were highlighted; and preferences for consultation type, majority of participants identified physical and emotional comfort being in their own space. For a small number of patients, continuing a face-to-face assessment was important due to expectation based on previous experience. CONCLUSION: The use of telehealth was supported during the management of COVID-19. Connectedness and convenience were key to the level of comfort and confidence for patients with lung cancer using telehealth during “lockdown.”

As healthcare systems have raced to prepare for, and manage, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID19) pandemic, we have seen a reorganization of how healthcare is delivered. Delivery of cancer care has been affected globally [1] [2] [3] . New Zealand (NZ) entered alert level 3 on 23 March 2020, restricting nonessential travel, work, and school (https:// covid 19. govt. nz/ alert-system/ about-the-alert-system/). On 25 March 2020, NZ moved to alert level 4 for five weeks, essentially locking down the country for all but essential services. People stayed home within their "bubbles" (immediate family groups), and healthcare delivery dramatically changed. People were instructed to stay at home in their "bubble" other than for essential personal movement; safe recreational activity was allowed close to home; travel was severely limited; all gatherings were cancelled, and all public venues closed; businesses were closed except for essential services; for example, supermarkets, pharmacies, clinics, petrol stations, and lifeline utilities stayed open; Educational facilities were closed; rationing of supplies and requisitioning of facilities was possible; Reprioritization of healthcare services began.

In NZ, we were afforded the benefit of learning from our colleagues around the world as they adapted rapidly to the barriers related to COVID-19 restrictions in delivering healthcare. Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service, which provides both oncology and hematology services for a population of approximately 700,000, quickly implemented pathways to protect vulnerable patients. This included screening at the entrance to hospital buildings, restriction of visitors, delay of non-urgent investigations and treatment, application of PPE, and a shift from on-site clinic visits to telehealth.

Where clinicians may have historically resisted alternatives to face-to-face clinic patient consultations, universally adopted moves to alternatives such as telehealth became common during the COVID-19 restrictions. While telehealth offers an alternative approach to care delivery, there are a number of factors for consideration. Literature describing the use of telehealth and video conferencing identifies advantages and disadvantages for patients and clinicians [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] . Virtual assessments may offer a reduction in patient related costs such as petrol, travel, time off work, and childcare. In addition, some patients report that a virtual assessment is less stressful than attending a face-to-face consultation [7] . Clinicians identified convenience and flexibility with virtual consultations and expressed that the addition of tools such as email and texting could facilitate assessments in the cases of patients who were too anxious to attend face-to-face consultations or had communication difficulties [5] However, concern regarding telehealth is expressed in a number of reviews, with the potential for increased clinical risk and future uptake of services. Challenges related to technology, including familiarity of use, access to internet and data, and confidentiality, are all ongoing concerns for services planning virtual assessments and remote care delivery [5] . Concerns on how to communicate and connect with patients are being addressed in the development of virtual conversation guides and resources [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] .

The aim of this study was to explore lung cancer patient's experiences of telehealth consultations during COVID-19 restrictions.

A qualitative exploratory design using semi-structured interviews to collect patient experiences of telehealth. An exploration of the barriers and enablers to telehealth assessments during COVID-19 lockdowns.

Thirty patients with lung cancer who had been registered with the oncology department during level 3 and level 4 lockdowns were recruited between May and June 2020. Participants were eligible if they had a diagnosis of lung cancer regardless of their current or expected illness trajectory. Patients were approached consecutively until ten slots were filled in each cohort. Due to restrictions around translation services, patients could not be recruited if they did not speak English fluently and had required telephone interpreters during telehealth assessments.

Purposeful sampling was used to ensure Māori patients were represented, in keeping with our commitments to the Treaty of Waitangi. The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand's founding document and forms an agreement between Māori and Pakeha (English) around the principles of partnership, participation, and protection [20] .

Eligible participants' identified from electronic clinical records were invited to participate by an Oncology Research Nurse. People who expressed an interest to participate were emailed a participant information sheet and consent form. They were called a week later to obtain verbal consent.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted over the telephone, using an interview guide to facilitate discussion (see Table 1 ). Interview questions were developed following a review of the telehealth literature and from information already gathered as part of a larger study on the use of remote surveillance models in lung cancer (yet to be published). Patient's whānau (extended family; sometimes used to include friends who may not have any kinship ties) were invited to contribute to the interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim ( Table 2 ).

Interview transcripts were read and thematically coded using NVivo software, following a general inductive analysis approach [21] . An iterative process was applied across all codes, as themes were considered and developed into broader conceptual themes [21, 22] . Rigor was achieved through inter-rater reliability via independent review of codes by the co-authors, peer review and discussion of findings, and by selecting quotes which contained a rich description of the patient experience.

Ethics was obtained from the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC AH1337).

Participants were predominantly female and of New Zealand European ethnicity, but distributed evenly across the treatment trajectory: curative intent such as adjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine, palliative intent such as carboplatin and gemcitabine, and patients between treatments under surveillance. Māori indigenous peoples were purposefully recruited with the aim of having 25% representation. Participants were predominantly in the 60-69 years old age bracket ( 

Many participants talked about the convenience of consulting with healthcare professionals without leaving home. Factors such as saving time, travel costs, and not having to take time off work to attend hospital appointments were highlighted. In addition, many participants referred to barriers they had previously experienced when having to come to the hospital for appointments that no longer existed during telehealth consultations: For one participant the convenience of telehealth had an impact not only on herself but on the people she relied on to bring her to hospital since she could no longer drive:

With not being able to drive anymore, it was great that I didn't have to find somewhere that would take time, not just out of my day, but somebody else's day. And sometimes it can be a good half a day, just to attend maybe a 15-minute clinic. By the time you've got in and parked and prepared. So in terms of timing, it was really great, I really appreciated the fact that I could just pick up the phone and have a good conversation and put it down and get on with the rest of my day. (Female, NZE, Palliative, 72) Did you feel less rushed than in the hospital setting? Did you feel your concerns and needs were covered? How did being in your own environment impact your feelings of safety? What concerns did you have not seeing someone face to face?

Did telehealth feel less personal? Would you prefer human contact? What concerns, if any, did you have not having a physical exam? How did you find the technology? What was the burden at your end?

Technology, time, including whānau, utilizing interpreters? What happened for you between TH calls?

Cancer society, nurse specialist, acute oncology, ED, GP If you had symptoms that you were concerned about, what was your experience of contacting the service?

Positive experiences and difficulties you had. Did you contact those support services more than usual? Do you feel you gained a sense of independence with your healthcare, and if so, how did that impact your confidence and independence around your health? In what ways did you gain education about your healthcare, self-care, and management of your symptoms? 

Participants expressed a range of preferences around faceto-face assessments versus telehealth. For a small number of patients, continuing a traditional face-to-face assessment was important as they had an expectation based on previous experience. One participant identified that the healthcare system had always used face-to-face consultations as the standard approach:

It seems more personal with the doctor. You're so used to seeing your GP face-to-face that you've been used to for years and years. (Male, NZE, Palliative, 85)

Other participants described the importance of body language during face-to-face consultations and how this helped with communication: 

A strong preference for well-established relationships permeated the findings. The sense of connection established prior to the telehealth consultation supported participants to engage with healthcare professionals. Many participants identified the importance of connectedness during COVID-19, which was amplified by a sense of isolation and lack of perceived access to support services: 

Participants described various ways they sought help during the COVID-19 restrictions, including accessing hospital and community based support, and online information.

Motivation to contact certain services varied. For example, for some, participants sought help from services that they perceived as being the "experts": In part, the sense of expertise came from "conditioning" during orientation to oncology services, and therefore strong relationships with hospital based support did not alter during COVID-19 restrictions: Contact through the oncology department allowed participants to be triaged over the telephone and have medication scripts emailed out to community pharmacies. Remote management was more convenient than attending their family physician, as no appointments were required, and they were accessing oncology expertise directly: 

Many participants expressed a growing sense of independence during the COVID-19 restrictions and found various ways to build resilience, while they "got used to" a new normal: A small number of participants were concerned to access support as they believed that the health service was already "overwhelmed" managing COVID issues". Participants identified confidence in the telehealth process; however, this was impacted by concerns around communication. Confidence is a key factor in building resilience, and the importance of communication during COVID-19 restrictions was raised by participants. There was fear that clinicians would not understand the symptoms being described; that they themselves may not understand communications from the oncology team; and fear around how they may have coped if they were told their cancer was progressing:

But that was my main concern, whether they could understand what I was trying to say properly. ( More positively, many participants described how telehealth gave them a chance to include whānau in a way they were unable to with on-site clinic visits. Participants described difficulties in coordinating whānau to attend a clinic appointment. However, with telehealth and family being at home during level 3 and 4 COVID-19 restrictions, involving them in the telehealth consultations was easier:

I think that in the interviews there were opportunities to ask a lot of questions, I had support and in many of those interviews I had wither my wife with me, or my daughter with me, and they'd written things down that I had wanted to ask beforehand. (Male, NZE, Curative, 59)

This study is the first conducted in NZ exploring experiences of lung cancer patients during level 4 COVID-19 restrictions. While there are a growing number of publications exploring or describing various aspects of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic globally, currently, none describes the patient experience and any barriers or enablers to carrying out telehealth assessments during this time. Participants in this study expressed a range of views associated with using telehealth. Most found the use of telehealth acceptable. For some participants, telehealth was preferable to usual clinic attendance. Participants expressed anxiety about visiting the hospital during COVID-19 restrictions, for fear of contracting COVID-19, or being around other sick patients.

While a number of themes relating to patient experience of telehealth are well described in the literature [6, 8, 12, 23, 24] , two new themes emerged in this study: how patients seek help and resilience.

A systematic review found that patients using telehealth were reassured by a sense of having a safety net, with timely access to healthcare providers (HCP) [25] . Such a safety net may be considered active (where patients made active connections with HCP) or passive (where patients were being monitored passively by their HCP). Findings from this study suggests that how patients chose to seek help during COVID-19 telehealth did not vary hugely from their usual routine, with patients tending towards making contact where they had already established relationships, or where had built a sense of trust around perceptions of expertise. However, some participants found that their sense of independence grew and that they managed their own healthcare in ways they may not have prior to COVID-19 management, becoming less passive. Established relationships, ease of access to support, and communication were key values for patients when seeking help.

A sense of personalized care can play an important role in how patients engage with telehealth and in managing their own health care [23, 26] . In this study, having a range of options for patients to choose how they accessed support gave them a sense of personalized care, even in this pandemic setting. Less well understood is the concept of orientating patients in healthcare settings [25] . Patients are orientated at the start of oncology treatment and orientated to who, how, and when they should seek help. Due to the serious nature of side effects from oncology treatments, clinicians reinforce the importance of contacting the oncology department, rather than a family physician. Findings from this study suggest that during the COVID-19 restrictions, this heightened sense of needing to seek "expert help" from oncology services was exacerbated. In addition, the messages being relayed through the media around "vulnerable populations" including those having cancer treatment may have resulted in greater contact with "oncology experts."

The fear of contracting COVID-19 from a community source was a factor in decisions regarding contact with the family physician; however, factors such as inconvenience and associated costs may also be relevant. These issues may influence a patient's need to seek help from a trusted source. Similar to findings in this study, the importance of relationships with healthcare providers is identified in the literature [6, 27] . Maintaining key relationships to adapt to a "new normal" may be utilized alongside personal resources and psychological tools to develop and maintain resilience. Participants in this current study identified the challenges of developing a trusted relationship with a member of the oncology team if they had not previously met them.

Resilience associated with the use of telehealth has not been well explored in the literature. However, a recent literature review identified a number of factors which contribute to a sense of resilience for cancer patients [28] . While a diagnosis of cancer may feel overwhelming, it can give patients the opportunity to develop personal skills and better coping strategies. Personal attributes such as "hardiness," which may be developed as a coping strategy, are important buffers for cancer patients [29, 30] . Family and friends are often a source of support and are important in making meaning of the cancer process [27, 28] . However, barriers exist which exclude family from outpatient clinic consultations including inability to get time away from work to attend appointments, the size of clinic rooms precluding more than one support person to attend, or the resistance to patients calling family members to "listen in" on the consultation. Participants in the current study identified similar concerns, stating that during telehealth, they could coordinate whānau involvement. Furthermore, being at home in a familiar surrounding helped participants to feel relaxed, whereas the clinic environment could be intimidating or unsupportive of cultural needs.

Strengths of this study are that the sample represented a range of gender, ethnicity, stages of disease, and ages. In addition, the interview questions were informed by previous literature on telehealth. Patient experiences informed findings, and the interviews took place during COVID-19 restrictions.

Numbers within each treatment intent group were small, and therefore it may not be possible to draw firm conclusions from the data gathered. The period of time patients had experienced telehealth assessments was also relatively short, and patient's experiences may alter over time, as they get used to telehealth appointments. Whilst New Zealand has been identified as a country that was more successful at managing waves of the virus, in part that was due to far more rigorous lockdown plans than other countries. Despite these restrictions being strictly enforced, telehealth ensured that the majority of cancer care could continue and could be used as a model for countries with healthcare systems overrun with COVID-19 support. A further limitation was the exclusion of patients who could not speak English and required translators. The group this impacted were Cantonese and Mandarin speaking patients, and if there was to be further expansion of this work, this would need addressing.

Future research including quality of life data would be useful to compare patient's understanding of resilience, how they maintained resilience, and the impact such active coping had on their quality of life. Follow-up of the impact of telehealth on cancer care beyond COVID-19 management would be useful to explore once there is a return to a new "normal." Currently in our own local practice, there has been a push from clinicians and systems to return to faceto-face assessments, which is being net with mixed response from patients. Many patients in our lung cancer clinics are requesting that they continue with telehealth assessments now where systems and processes are in place.

This study supports the use of telehealth during the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the setting of lung cancer. The strength of relationships developed between healthcare providers, both within the hospital setting and the community, were key to this level of comfort and confidence. Participants identified the convenience of telehealth and a level of safety. Further research including a range of different cancer types may help to better understand relationships between active coping, resilience, and quality of life in the setting of telehealth.

Author contribution Study concept and design, AF/RM. Data collection and analysis, AF. Draft, AF. Revision of manuscript, AF/RM/JR.

The research leading to these results received funding from the Cancer Society of New Zealand under Grant Agreement as a Research Training Grant.

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publically available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Code availability Not applicable.

Ethics approval AH1337 Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC).

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

COVID-19: impact on cancer workforce and delivery of care

Mossialos E (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care

Oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study

A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers

Cancer survivors' experience with telehealth: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care

Telehealthcare for long term conditions

The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview

What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American

Virtual visits -confronting the challenges of telemedicine

Feasibility and acceptance of a telehealth intervention to promote symptom management during treatment for head and neck cancer

Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study

Gippsland Region Palliative Care Consortium

Covid-19: A remote assessment in primary care

Communication challenges and COVID -19

Specialty guides for patient management during the coronavirus pandemic: Clinical guide for the management of remote consultations and remote working in secondary care during the coronavirus pandemic

COVID-19 Communication skills

The Treaty in brief

Using thematic analysis in psychology

Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry

Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective

Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study

Information interventions for orienting patients and their carers to cancer care facilities

Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses

Resilience among patients across the cancer continuum: diverse perspectives

Resilience in Cancer Patients Frontiers in Psychiatry 10

The role of psychological hardiness and marital satisfaction in predicting posttraumatic growth in a sample of women with breast cancer in Isfahan. Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention 9:e4080 30. Hamama-Raz Y (2012) Does psychological adjustment of melanoma survivors differs between genders

The participants have consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

The authors declare no competing interests.