key: cord-0720565-um1yalwm
authors: Buskermolen, Maaike; te Paske, Karlijn; van Beek, Janko; Kortbeek, Titia; Götz, Hannelore; Fanoy, Ewout; Feenstra, Sabiena; Richardus, Jan Hendrik; Vollaard, Albert
title: Relapse in the first 8 weeks after onset of COVID-19 disease in outpatients: Viral reactivation or inflammatory rebound?
date: 2021-06-18
journal: J Infect
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.015
sha: 16cdda55715f6a473855dfbf048105d8d01a2c74
doc_id: 720565
cord_uid: um1yalwm

nan

We read with interest the study by Gousseff et al. about 4 mild cases with clinical recurrences of COVID-19 on day 24-36 after start of symptoms 1 . Our findings in 41 outpatients with a relapse may further help to unravel which mechanism plays a role in similar cases: viral reactivation, reinfection or inflammatory rebound.

Reinfection of COVID-19 is commonly defined as clinical recurrence accompanied by a positive PCR test more than 90 days after onset of the primary infection 2 . Within that timeframe re-positive PCR results following negative tests occur in more than 10% of recovering COVID-19 patients 1 , [3] [4] [5] . The combination of a clinical recurrence ('relapse') after a symptom-free interval and re-positive PCR results has not been explored extensively and may be rare: 0.1% in outpatients with median 25 days (max. 84) between 2 positive results 6 . To minimize transmission risk the Dutch guideline proposes a timeframe of 8 weeks instead of 90 days after disease onset to consider reinfection; only patients with a relapse 8 or more weeks after disease onset are advised to isolate and retest 7 . To provide evidence to support this approach, we aimed to determine whether an early relapse in outpatients is accompanied by concurrent SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR results with low Cycle threshold (Ct) values ('viral reactivation').

Outpatients were identified during source investigation and contact tracing by the public health service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond in local COVID-19 testing sites that became operational on 1 June 2020. Samples from nose and throat swabs from patients experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms are processed in 14 local laboratories. Not all laboratories report a Ct value in all positive RT-PCR test results due to technical characteristics of some of their RT-PCR platforms. The PHS is mandatorily notified by laboratories in case of positive SARS-CoV-2 results and all test-positive patients are routinely contacted to record clinical data.

During the study period of 1 June-15 November 2020 340,916 tests were performed; 46,073 were positive. Outpatients with a relapse were retrospectively identified from the register in two ways: 1) patients who called the PHS to enquire about the need to retest because of recurrent COVID-19-like symptoms and who were subsequently retested ( n = 17), and 2) patients with recurrence of symptoms and who self-initiated testing within 8 weeks after the first test ( n = 24).

The median age of the 41 patients was 33 years (range 11-58); 14 (34%) were female; none were immunocompromised nor admitted during either disease episode. The first symptomatic period lasted a median of 8 days (range 0-31), and patients re-ported headache (55%), muscle ache (55%), nasal cold (48%), loss of taste or smell (48%), cough (45%), sore throat (37%) and fever (35%) ( Table 1 & 2 ). The median symptom-free interval was 12 days (range 2-30). During relapse they most frequently reported cough (45%), nasal cold (39%), headache (26%) and sore throat (21%). Fever was reported by 2 patients as a new symptom among the 4 who reported fever during the relapse.

RT-PCR Ct values and RT-PCR platforms used were requested from the diagnostic laboratories. The first PCR test was performed a median of 4 days (IQR 2-6) after disease onset with a median Ct value of 22.1 (range 16.0-34.8, n = 27, Table 1 ). Out of 41 relapse patients, 33 had been retested a median of 28 days (range 10-58) after the first test and a median of 4 days (range 1-34) after relapse onset. The second test result was positive in 27 cases (82%). In 17 patients a Ct value could be retrieved, median was 34.8 (range 29.2-38.0). Paired comparison of Ct values in 10 patients showed a median increase of 14.9 cycles (range −1.0-20.0) in the second test (one case with lower Ct value in the second test: both > 33).

Consequently, in mild COVID-19 cases without risk factors such as old age or immunosuppression a relapse may occur in the first 8 weeks after disease onset without viral reactivation. Sometimes PCR results were negative or -in case of positivity of the second test -high or consistently increased Ct values can be found. This is considered to reflect the gradual decline of the initial viral load with prolonged shedding of non-replicating virus 2 . Possibly inflammatory rebound may explain the clinical recurrence, but this was not measured in these outpatients. Furthermore, onward viral transmission is improbable because Ct values around 30 or higher, as determined in our outpatients during the relapse, are unlikely to result in spread of viable virus 8 , 9 . Similarly, in the studies examining SARS-CoV-2 PCR re-positivity in non-immunocompromised patients, virus cultures were negative 1 , 3 , 4 , 10 . These data support the Dutch guidelines that do not advice re-isolation or retesting of outpatients with an early relapse 7 . Only in case of severe disease manifestations during relapse or new symptoms after direct contact with another proven COVID-19 case the standard measures of isolation and retesting are applicable also in the first 8 weeks.

There are limitations to these findings of this retrospective study. Relapse was self-reported and its true incidence, cause, and contributing factors remain unknown. Because we did not perform serology or genomic sequencing, theoretically reinfection within 8 weeks due to lack of protective immunity could not be ruled out. However, viral RNA re-positivity may occur with or without the presence of SARS-CoV-2 protective antibodies 5 . Caution must be used in interpreting Ct values of RT-PCR tests as a surrogate for viral load because these were obtained from various laboratories with distinct RT-PCR platforms or gene targets. Findings in young outpatients with a mild course of disease cannot be extrapolated to hospitalized cases, high-risk groups or viral loads associated with . Cases 2, 3 tested because of COVID-19 positive contacts and remained asymptomatic for several weeks. Cases 4, 32 tested just before start of symptoms because of COVID-19 positive contacts. Cases 7, 10, 39 did not have a symptom-free interval, but experienced a substantial exacerbation after partial recovery. Case 6 retested negative one day after the second test. Case 11 tested negative in the symptom-free interval. other SARS-CoV-2 variants than those that were circulating during the study period. We did not verify whether secondary cases arose in the households of these patients.

In conclusion, viral reactivation was unlikely in mildly affected COVID-19 outpatients without risk factors for severe disease with a relapse in the first 8 weeks of illness, and retesting or isolation seems unnecessary.

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare regarding this subject. This work had no financial support.

Clinical recurrences of COVID-19 symptoms after recovery: viral relapse, reinfection or inflammatory rebound?

Definitions for coronavirus disease 2019 reinfection, relapse and PCR re-positivity

Findings from investigation and analysis of re-positive cases

Clinical, immunological and virological characterization of COVID-19 patients that test re-positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR

A systematic review and meta-analysis of discharged COVID-19 patients retesting positive for RT-PCR

Rates of recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 swab results among patients attending primary care in Qatar

Predicting Infectious SARS-CoV-2 from Diagnostic Samples. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards

Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with potential SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection

We thank the laboratory technicians and microbiologists who put effort into tracing test results from: Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Reinier de Graafziekenhuis, Streeklab Haarlem, Star SHL, Eurofins Rijswijk, Microvida (Amphia Ziekenhuis), Microvida (Admiraal de Ruyterziekenhuis), Reinier Haga MDC, Diagnostiek voor U, Pandemielab Deventer, Groene Hartziekenhuis.

MB, KP and AV were responsible for the study design and analyses. MB, KP and AV drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors gave critical revisions on intellectual content of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.