key: cord-0719765-vrfowf0c
authors: Ziuzia-Januszewska, Laura; Januszewski, Marcin
title: Pathogenesis of Olfactory Disorders in COVID-19
date: 2022-03-27
journal: Brain Sci
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040449
sha: 877f6452c0b3f60823ca8fdd47b807b0e0b7ff08
doc_id: 719765
cord_uid: vrfowf0c

Since the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, olfactory disorders have been reported as a frequent symptom of COVID-19; however, its pathogenesis is still debated. The aim of this review is to summarize the current understanding of the pathogenesis of smell impairment in the course of COVID-19 and to highlight potential avenues for future research on this issue. Several theories have been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of COVID-19-related anosmia, including nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, oedema of the olfactory cleft mucosa, olfactory epithelial damage either within the olfactory receptor cells or the supporting non-neural cells (either direct or immune-mediated), damage to the olfactory bulb, and impairment of the central olfactory pathways. Although the pathogenesis of COVID-19-related anosmia is still not fully elucidated, it appears to be mainly due to sensorineural damage, with infection of the olfactory epithelium support cells via the ACE1 receptor and disruption of the OE caused by immense inflammatory reaction, and possibly with direct olfactory sensory neurons infection mediated by the NRP-1 receptor. Involvement of the higher olfactory pathways and a conductive component of olfactory disorders, as well as genetic factors, may also be considered.

Since the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, smell impairment has been reported as a frequent symptom of COVID-19, with reported prevalence ranging widely in the literature from 5 to 98.3% [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] . The association of olfactory disorders (OD) with COVID-19 is now established, but OD pathogenesis is still debated [12] [13] [14] [15] .

Odor detection begins with the binding of odorant molecules to odor receptors localized on the dendritic cilia of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) in the olfactory epithelium (OE) [16, 17] . OSNs axons cross the skull base through the cribriform plate and form synapses within the olfactory bulb (OB) [16, 17] . Olfactory information is sent from the OB to higher brain centers [16, 17] .

The OE is a complex tissue consisting of multiple cell types, including OSNs, sustentacular (SUS) cells, mucus-secreting Bowman's gland cells, microvillar cells, and stem cells including globose and horizontal basal cells. In addition, macrophages and dendritic cells are present in the OE [18] [19] [20] . SUS cells act to structurally support OSNs, protect OSNs by phagocyting and/or detoxifying potentially harmful agents, enable odor detection by endocytosis of the olfactory binding protein and odorant complex, supply OSNs with glucose necessary for high energy olfactory transduction cascade, and maintain local fluid and electrolyte balance [17, 18, 21] . The basal cells can differentiate to replace OSNs during normal turnover or injury [19, 20] . Bowman's glands secrete mucus, containing water, salts, mucin glycoproteins, enzymes, antibodies, and odorant binding proteins (OBPs), which transport the hydrophobic odorant molecules through the mucus to the OSNs cilia [20] . Olfactory dysfunctions can be

To discuss the pathogenesis of COVID-19-related anosmia, the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry must be elucidated. SARS-CoV-2, similarly to SARS-CoV, utilizes the S1 domain of its spike (S) protein for attaching the virion to the host cell membrane by binding to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor [32, 33] . This interaction requires cleavage and priming of the S protein by cell proteases, including transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and furin, which allows fusion between the cellular and the viral membranes, and viral entry into the cell via endocytosis [17, 32, 34, 35] . Alternative SARS-CoV-2 entry mediators have also been suggested, including receptors and cofactors such as CD147 and neuropilin-1 (NRP1), and activators such as cathepsin Figure 1 [36] [37] [38] . ACE-2 is expressed in multiple cell surfaces throughout the body, including lung parenchyma, respiratory epithelium, gastrointestinal epithelium, endothelium, arterial smooth muscles, neuronal glial cells, neurons, renal tubular cells, heart, and lymphoid tissues [33, [39] [40] [41] [42] . TMPRSS2 was also found to be expressed in multiple organs, such as in the respiratory tract, salivary glands, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidneys [34, 43] . This ubiquitous expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 may explain the pleiotropic effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection [44] . However, the primary targets of SARS-CoV-2 are the cells manifesting high expression of these proteins, especially those that co-express ACE2 and TMPRSS2, such as respiratory and olfactory epithelial cells [17, 38] . It is noteworthy that SARS-CoV-2 appears to have a particularly strong affinity for ACE2, estimated to be 10-to-20-fold higher than for SARS-CoV, which might explain its particular impact on chemosensory systems [29, 33, 45] .

OSNs cilia [20] . Olfactory dysfunctions can be classified into three types: c orders caused by obstruction of the nasal cavities and subsequent block transmission to the olfactory epithelium (OE), sensorineural loss caused by OE or olfactory nerve, and central dysfunction resulting from damage t processing pathway in the central nervous system (CNS). [16, 22] Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 entry. Spike protein domain S1 is pre-activated by the host f tor binding domain (RBD) of S1 binds to the ACE2 receptor. Cleavage at S2′ site by transmembrane protease (TMPRSS2) causes further structural changes in the spike expose the fusion peptide (FP) of S2 that enables the fusion of the viral and host ce cleaved S1 fragment of the spike protein may also bind directly to neuropilin-1 (NR Loss of the sense of smell due to upper respiratory tract infections (UR considered a conductive loss secondary to rhinorrhea and mucosal edem normalizes as the infection resolves [23] . However, in some cases, loss of sm after the resolution of UTRI, suggesting a sensorineural disorder known a factory dysfunction (PVOD) [23, 24] . PVOD is one of the leading causes adults, accounting for approximately 11-40% of cases [24] [25] [26] . Accordin studies, several respiratory viruses can cause PVOD, including rhinovirus virus, Epstein-Barr virus and some coronaviruses, with previously disco viruses accounting for 10-15% of cases [24, 25, 27] .

Several theories have been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of lated anosmia. These include conductive loss of smell due to nasal obstru norrhea, oedema of the olfactory cleft mucosa that prevents odorants from olfactory epithelium, olfactory epithelial damage, infection of the olfacto through retrograde neuroinvasion, the olfactory bulb, and impairment of factory pathways. due to direct viral invasion or indirect injury caused by thelial damage, or an abnormal inflammatory response. Damage to the ol lium may be caused by direct viral invasion of the olfactory sensory neuron likely mediated by the neuropilin-1 receptor, or by infection of the non-ne the olfactory epithelium, leading to horizontal viral spread to OSNs or imp logical and physiological support of OSNs [13, 17, 22, 23, [28] [29] [30] [31] .

To discuss the pathogenesis of COVID-19-related anosmia, the mecha CoV-2 cellular entry must be elucidated. SARS-CoV-2, similarly to SARS-C S1 domain of its spike (S) protein for attaching the virion to the host cell binding to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor [32 Spike protein domain S1 is pre-activated by the host furin. The receptor binding domain (RBD) of S1 binds to the ACE2 receptor. Cleavage at S2 site by the type 2 transmembrane protease (TMPRSS2) causes further structural changes in the spike protein and expose the fusion peptide (FP) of S2 that enables the fusion of the viral and host cells. The furin-cleaved S1 fragment of the spike protein may also bind directly to neuropilin-1 (NRP-1).

Many studies have reported the early onset [2, 5, 46] and early recovery [4, 5, 7, 8, 47, 48] of olfactory disorders (OD) in the course of COVID-19. This could argue in favor of a conductive mechanism for OD, related to the inflammation of nasal mucosa [9, 47] . However, many COVID-19 patients report OD in the absence of nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea [3, 5, 6, 10, 48] . In a study by Chung et al. [47] , only 17% of patients with OD reported nasal symptoms, and minimal inflammatory infiltrates were found in nasal biopsy specimens. Moreover, many studies have reported no association between the presence and severity of OD in COVID-19 and nasal symptoms [6, 49] , and in a study by Lechien et al. [49] , some anosmic COVID-19 patients had normal acoustic rhinometry. In addition, Haehner at el. [50] , found that self-rated changes in nasal airflow were more pronounced in SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with smell loss compared to SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with OD, while smell deterioration was reported to be more severe by SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. These findings suggest that rhinitis and nasal mucosa obstruction are not the main factors in the development of COVID-19-related OD.

Some imaging studies in anosmic COVID-19 patients show olfactory cleft mucosal edema that may prevent odorants from reaching the olfactory epithelium, even in the absence of nasal congestion [51] [52] [53] . However, other reports did not reveal significant olfactory cleft obstruction [54] [55] [56] , suggesting that it is not the primary mechanism in COVID-19-related anosmia [12, 55, 56] .

Another possible pathomechanism for anosmia is the neural hypothesis, suggesting direct damage to the olfactory nerves, and a retrograde invasion of the olfactory bulb and higher olfactory pathways in the CNS [57, 58] .

The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 is supported by various neurological manifestations of COVID-19 described in the literature [1, [59] [60] [61] . In a retrospective case series by Mao et al. [1] , 36.4% of 214 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had neurologic mani-festations, including dizziness, headache, impaired consciousness, acute cerebrovascular disease, ataxia, seizure, smell or taste impairment, vision impairment, nerve pain, and symptoms of skeletal muscle injury manifestations [1] . In another retrospective study of 814 COVID-19 patients, 57.4% developed neurological symptoms, including myalgias, headache, dizziness, disorders of consciousness, myopathy, dysautonomia, cerebrovascular diseases, seizures, movement disorders, encephalitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and optic neuritis [61] . Furthermore, encephalopathy, meningitis, acute transverse myelitis, and coma have also been reported in the literature [59, 60] . It has also been hypothesized that viral infection of the respiratory center in the medulla oblongata could cause respiratory failure, which may even occur in the absence of dyspnea [33, 41] . Moreover, a study by Bhattacharjeea et al. [62] , found that COVID-19 patients have significantly reduced olfactory matching abilities, which the authors considered a sign of cognitive impairment, possibly related to infection in the higher brain centers.

However, the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 do not necessarily indicate a direct viral neuroinvasion, as they may also be due to hypoxic brain injury, cerebrovascular injury, or immune mediated damage [59, 63, 64] . Indeed, severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia may lead to systemic hypoxia and hypercapnia, peripheral vasodilatation, and anaerobic metabolism with an accumulation of toxins and subsequent brain damage due to cerebral edema [60, 63] . Cerebrovascular injury may result from viral binding to endothelial ACE2 receptors, which in turn leads to increased luminal pressure and intracranial hemorrhage. Moreover, cerebrovascular injury may be due to an abnormal inflammatory response known as the cytokine storm, which involves the overproduction and excessive release of cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL10, and TNFα, and increased activation of T lymphocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells, leading to a vascular leakage and an overactivation of the complement system and the coagulation cascade, with subsequent disseminated intravascular coagulation, thromboembolism, and multiorgan failure [59, 63, 64] . Interestingly, IL-6, which has been shown to regulate neuronal and glial cell activity, may play a role in regulating olfactory neuronal activity, and can also directly inhibit olfactory function through activating apoptosis using TNF-α, or affecting signaling by neuropoietin [65] . In a study by Cazzolla et al. [65] , OD was correlated with higher levels of IL-6, and improvement of the olfactory function was associated with decreased IL-6 levels [65] . However, Sanli et al. [66] , reported significantly lower serum IL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients with OD compared to normosmic subjects, so the role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of OD remains unclear.

Some studies reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 particles in post-mortem brain examination [67, 68] and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by RT-PCR in cerebrospinal fluid samples [60] , supporting the direct brain injury hypothesis, although the brain seems to contain either the least volume of viral particles of all of the sampled tissues, or no particles at all [29, 68] , and RT-PCR positivity does not necessarily prove the presence of whole viral particles in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [29] .

Direct invasion of the CNS could occur either through the hematogenous or the retrograde neuronal route [1] . In the hematogenous pathway, viruses may reach the bloodstream due to increased permeability of local blood vessels and epithelial disruption, and may then enter the brain by one of several ways: invasion of endothelial cells of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), paracellular transmigration enabled by increased BBB permeability caused by the release of inflammatory mediators, crossing of the blood-CSF barrier in the choroid plexus, or infection of leukocytes capable of passing through the BBB (the "Trojan horse" mechanism) [54, [69] [70] [71] . However, according to Li et al. [41] , the hematogenous route of SARS-CoV spread is unlikely since almost no viral particles were detected in the non-neuronal cells of infected brain areas [41, 54] , which may also be true for SARS-CoV-2 [72, 73] .

The olfactory pathway was hypothesized as a potential route for direct viral neuroinvasion. In this mechanism, the virus reaches the brain through the olfactory epithelium by invading peripheral nerve terminals and propagating via axonal transport towards the OB, from where it may spread trans-synaptically using retrograde and anterograde transport to other brain areas [1, 59, 63, 74, 75] . Alternatively, the virus may pass from the OE through the olfactory ensheathing cells directly to the CSF surrounding the olfactory nerve bundles and the OB [20, 45] .

This transneuronal route of CNS involvement is supported by the post-mortem examinations revealing SARS-CoV-2 viral particles and related damage to be more present in the OSNs and the OB than in the brainstem [76, 77] . Interestingly, it has also been hypothesized that inflammatory infiltration of the OB with increased INF-I levels may be responsible for the development of anosmia, and at the same time contributes to the arrest of viral spread into the brain [75] . The hypothesis of neuronal damage as the causative mechanism in SARS-CoV-2-related OD is further supported by reports of OB abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including features of micro bleeding and oedema, observed in anosmic COVID-19 patients [78, 79] . Moreover, transient cortical hyperintensity in the right gyrus rectus has been described [78] . Other studies have also shown the reduction in OB volumes, indicative of its atrophy [53, 80] . On the other hand, Akkaya et al. [81] found no significant difference in OB volumes between anosmic and normosmic COVID-19 patients. However, they observed an association between OB morphology and OD, with normal, oval or inverted J-shaped OBs (type N) more common in normosmic patients, while shrunken or flattened OBs (type R) and the presence of asymmetric contour lobulation or more than one hyperintense focus on T2 images (type D) were dominant in the anosmia group [81] . In another study, Esposito et al. [82] found no significant difference in OB volume between the previously SARS-CoV-2-infected hyposmic patients and healthy controls; however, diffusion and functional MRI revealed an increase in neural connectivity within the olfactory cortex and functional connectivity of the anterior piriform cortex, indicating a characteristic brain connectivity response in COVID-19-related hyposmia.

Moreover, several animal studies on previous human coronaviruses support the neuronal route of infection [74, 83] . HCoV-OC43 was reported to be found in mouse OSNs and OB 3 days after intranasal inoculation and in the brain 4 days post infection [84] . Moreover, in a study using K18-hACE2 transgenic mice expressing human ACE2, Netland et al. [81] demonstrated that intranasal infection with SARS-CoV resulted in neuroinvasion through the OB and rapid viral spread to the brain regions connected to the OB, such as the piriform and infralimbic cortices, the basal ganglia, and the midbrain, with significant neuronal death [54, 83] . Similarly, intranasal administration of SARS-CoV-2 in mice with the human ACE2 gene caused a rapid infection of the brain [85] . Additionally, Jiao et al. [86] demonstrated that in rhesus monkeys, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detectable in the CSF, the olfactory trigone, and the entorhinal area on days 1, 4, and 7 after intranasal inoculation, respectively.

However, it should be noted that the studies in mouse models utilized transgenic mice with human ACE2 that could be ectopically expressed in many cells, including OSNs, and therefore may not be a reliable model of the viral tropism [28, 29] . Indeed, several sequencing studies found ACE2 and TMPRSS2 to be co-expressed in non-neuronal cells of the OE rather than in the OSNs [29, 38, 87] . Moreover, sequencing and immunostaining studies revealed that OB neurons also do not express detectable levels of ACE2 [17, 29] . Similarly, no significant expression of ACE2 or TMPRSS2 was found in neurons in the brain [17, 29] .

Moreover, the higher incidence of anosmia compared with CNS symptoms, as well as the commonly observed early recovery of OD, argue against the central mechanism of SARS-CoV2-related OD [47, 58, 88, 89] .

Another mechanism for COVID-19-related anosmia may be sensorineural damage, with the disruption of the OE.

Indeed, Vaira et al. [88] , reported massive olfactory epithelium disruption in a patient with anosmia persisting for three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similarly, de Melo et al. [13] , in a study of the olfactory neuroepithelium of seven COVID-19 patients presenting with acute loss of smell, reported the SARS-CoV2 infection in multiple cell types within the OE, including OSNs, support cells, and immune cells. Interestingly, sampling of the olfactory mucosa of the patients with long-term anosmia revealed the persistence of virus transcripts up to 6 months after initial diagnosis, accompanied by the protracted inflammation [13] . Moreover, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in OSNs was shown in intranasally infected Syrian hamsters [90] .

As mentioned above, several sequencing studies found ACE2 and TMPRSS2 to be co-expressed in non-neuronal cells of the olfactory epithelium, including sustentacular (support) cells, stem cells, and perivascular cells, rather than in the OSNs [17, 38, 87] . It was therefore hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 infects high-ACE2-expressing non-neuronal cells of the OE before passing to OSNs [45] . Infection of OSNs may result from horizontal viral spread from the adjacent support cells or from dissemination of the virus within the OE after its tissue architecture is disrupted by inflammatory infiltrates [13] . Of note, in the aforementioned study by Netland et al. [83] , SARS-CoV was detected in the OB after approximately 60 h post inoculation, and subsequent transport in the brain only took a further 12-20 h, suggesting that initial replication and accumulation took place within the OE before the neural invasion [6, 45, 83] . In addition, in a study by de Melo et al. [13] , infection of the neuroepithelium was associated with the loss of OSN cilia, which are necessary for odor detection and transduction [13, 28] , and recovery of olfactory function was observed after the restoration of cilia in the late phase of infection [13] . Furthermore, Zazhytska et al. [91] , in a study of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters and humans, found no depletion in OSNs, but observed significant and persistent, non-cell autonomous downregulation of the olfactory receptor and their signaling pathway genes, preceded by reorganization in OSNs nuclear architecture, indicating that the virus may alter the physiology of OSNs without their direct infection.

Moreover, as SUS cells play an important role in the structural and functional support of the OSNs, it appears that their infection could cause impaired olfactory function even without direct neuronal invasion, by architectural OE damage and lack of physical support, impaired signaling, ionic imbalance, and initiating an immune response [17, 22, [28] [29] [30] . Indeed, a study by Bryche et al. [28] in a golden Syrian hamster model demonstrated that, after intranasal instillation, SARS-CoV-2 infected SUS cells, with immense infiltration of the immune cells, massive and rapid desquamation of the OE and a significant loss of OSN cilia, but the virus was not detected in the OSNs or OB [28] . This hypothesis is also in agreement with the relatively rapid recovery of most patients, occurring within weeks after infection, which may reflect the regenerative capability of the SUS cells. The infection of OE stem cells, including horizontal basal cells (HBCs), may be responsible for longer lasting OD in some cases [29, 30] . A noteworthy study by Torabi et al. [92] of mucosal samples taken from COVID-19 patients found increased levels of proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α, and the activation of an antiviral signaling cascade in the OE is hypothesized in the literature as reducing the expression of odorant receptors in OSNs [89] . Moreover, the involvement of Bowman's gland can deteriorate mucus production, further affecting odor detection [29] . Indeed, as olfactory receptors turn over every 24 h, but do not contain blood and lymphatic vessels or exhibit mitosis, their generation and maturation depend on stem cells activated by growth or transcription factors secreted into nasal mucus from nasal serous glands. SARS-CoV-2 infects these serous glands, and therefore may cause inhibition of stem cell activity and subsequent loss of smell [14] .

However, it should be noted that although almost no expression of ACE2 is found in the OSNs, they do express NRP1, which could account for direct OSNs infection [12, 13, 36] .

Cantuti-Castelvetri et al. [36] found abundant expression of NRP1 in almost all cell types of the OE, and study of human autopsies revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infected NRP1-positive cells in the OE and OB. In addition, the same study reported NRP1-mediated transport of virus-sized particles into the CNS after intranasal inoculation in mice [36] . Moreover, the expression of NRP1 has also been found in neuronal progenitor cells [12, 36] , which could also play a role in the persistent anosmia observed in some COVID-19 patients [12] .

Furthermore, although the previously reported rare occurrence of parosmia during recovery was considered to suggest the absence of damage to peripheral sensory neurons [89, 93] , it should be noted that its prevalence may have been overlooked in early reports, due to the short observation period [94] . In a study by Hopkins et al. [94] , the prevalence of parosmia after a median interval of 2.5 months (range 0-6) from the onset of OD was as high as 43.1% [94] , which may indicate the presence of disturbed regrowth and the domination of immature neurons in the OE [15] . Moreover, Di Stadio et al. [95] found that 40% of COVID-19 patients with persistent OD reported parosmia, and 16.6% of the parosmic individuals misperceived odors used during olfactory training. The authors hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation of the neuroepithelium and OB may result in impaired olfactory recovery with aberrant OSNs regeneration and misperception of odors in the neuroepithelium, as well as altered olfactory receptor mapping in the OB. Therefore, stimulation of these inflamed areas during olfactory training could increase both olfactory recovery and parosmia [95] .

There may be also a genetic link to the pathomechanism of OD in COVID-19. Indeed, in a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of COVID-19-related self-reported loss of smell or taste, Shelton et al. [96] identified a single associated locus in the vicinity of the UGT2A1 and UGT2A2 genes, encoding uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes. Interestingly, these enzymes are expressed in the OE and in rats UGT2A1 is involved in metabolizing odorants and olfactory signal termination [96] [97] [98] . This argues for a possible role of the identified genes in the dysfunction of OE cells and the associated olfactory disorders [96] .

The pathogenesis of COVID-19 related anosmia is still not fully elucidated; however, it appears to be mainly due to sensorineural damage, with infection of the OE support cells via the ACE1 receptor and disruption of the OE caused by immense inflammatory reaction, and possibly with direct OSNs infection mediated by the NRP-1 receptor. Involvement of the higher olfactory pathways and a conductive component of OD, as well as genetic factors, may also be considered. 

Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease

Smell dysfunction: A biomarker for COVID-19

Self-reported Olfactory and Taste Disorders in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Study

Features of anosmia in COVID-19

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 1420 European patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019

Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A multicenter European study

Prevalence and Duration of Acute Loss of Smell or Taste in COVID-19 Patients

Smell and taste alterations in COVID-19: A cross-sectional analysis of different cohorts

Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction as an Early Identifier of COVID-19 in Adults and Children: An International Multicenter Study

Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Anosmia and Ageusia: Common Findings in COVID-19 Patients

More that ACE2? NRP1 may play a central role in the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 and its association with enhanced survival

COVID-19-Related anosmia is associated with viral persistence and inflammation in human olfactory epithelium and brain infection in hamsters

How does Covid-19 infection affect smell?

Anosmia: An evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered

Position paper on olfactory dysfunction

Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia

Sustentacular Cell Enwrapment of Olfactory Receptor Neuronal Dendrites: An Update

Anatomy and Cellular Constituents of the Human Olfactory Mucosa: A Review

Viral infection and smell loss: The case of COVID-19

Anosmia in COVID-19: A Bumpy Road to Establishing a Cellular Mechanism

ACE2, TMPRSS2, and Furin expression in the nose and olfactory bulb in mice and human

Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunctions as a Clinical Manifestation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in a Malaysian Tertiary Center

Identification of Viruses in Patients With Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction

Loss of Sense of Smell Asmarker of COVID-19 Infection: Joint Statement from the British Rhinological Society and ENT-UK

Olfactory Disorders following Upper Respiratory Tract Infections

Coronaviruses and the Chemical Senses: Past, Present, and Future

Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters

COVID-19 and the Chemical Senses: Supporting Players Take Center Stage

The olfactory nerve: A shortcut for influenza and other viral diseases into the central nervous system: The olfactory nerve: A shortcut for viruses into the CNS

Evolution of Olfactory Disorders in COVID -19 Patients

SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor

Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms

Neurological Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Mechanisms and Manifestations. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 1039

Sinonasal pathophysiology of SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review of the current evidence

Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity

Neuropilin-1 as a new potential SARS-CoV-2 infection mediator implicated in the neurologic features and central nervous system involvement of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 Receptors and Entry Genes Are Expressed in the Human Olfactory Neuroepithelium and Brain

The Spatial and Cell-Type Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 in the Human and Mouse Brains

Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis

The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients

High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa

Expression of transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 in mouse and human tissues

Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19

CoV-2: Olfaction, Brain Infection, and the Urgent Need for Clinical Samples Allowing Earlier Virus Detection

Olfactory and gustatory function impairment in COVID-19 patients: Italian objective multicenter-study

Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: Single-center experience on 72 cases

Objective olfactory evaluation of self-reported loss of smell in a case series of 86 COVID-19 patients

Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Sudden and Complete Olfactory Loss of Function as a Possible Symptom of COVID-19

Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia

Olfactory Bulb MRI and Paranasal Sinus CT Findings in Persistent COVID-19 Anosmia

Brain Imaging of Patients with COVID-19: Findings at an Academic Institution during the Height of the Outbreak

Paranasal sinuses computed tomography findings in anosmia of COVID-19

Clinical and Radiological Evaluations of COVID -19 Patients With Anosmia: Preliminary Report

Anosmia in COVID-19: Mechanisms and Significance

Potential pathogenesis of ageusia and anosmia in COVID-19 patients

Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19: A literature review

A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2

Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry

Quantitative assessment of olfactory dysfunction accurately detects asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers

Neurological Consequences of 2019-nCoV Infection: A Comprehensive Literature Review

The Spectrum of Neuroimaging Findings on CT and MRI in Adults With COVID-19

Taste and Smell Disorders in COVID-19 Patients: Role of Interleukin-6

Relationship between disease severity and serum IL-6 levels in COVID-19 anosmia

Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Multiorgan and Renal Tropism of SARS-CoV-2

Encephalitic syndrome and anosmia in COVID-19: Do these clinical presentations really reflect SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism? A theory based on the review of 25 COVID-19 cases

Unraveling the Possible Routes of SARS-COV-2 Invasion into the Central Nervous System

Neuroinvasive and Neurotropic Human Respiratory Coronaviruses: Potential Neurovirulent Agents in Humans. In Infectious Diseases and Nanomedicine I

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells and Brain Organoids Reveal SARS-CoV-2 Neurotropism Predominates in Choroid Plexus Epithelium

SARS-CoV-2 Infects the Brain Choroid Plexus and Disrupts the Blood-CSF Barrier in Human Brain Organoids

Human Coronaviruses and Other Respiratory Viruses: Underestimated Opportunistic Pathogens of the Central Nervous System? Viruses

COVID-19-Related Anosmia: The Olfactory Pathway Hypothesis and Early Intervention

First ultrastructural autoptic findings of SARS-CoV-2 in olfactory pathways and brainstem

Postmortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings in lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Alteration of the Brain in a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Anosmia

Bilateral transient olfactory bulb edema during COVID-19-related anosmia

Olfactory bulb and mucosa abnormalities in persistent COVID-19-induced anosmia: A magnetic resonance imaging study

Evaluation of the olfactory bulb volume and morphology in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Can differences create predisposition to anosmia?

Tessitore, A. Olfactory loss and brain connectivity after COVID-19. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2022

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection Causes Neuronal Death in the Absence of Encephalitis in Mice Transgenic for Human ACE2

Axonal Transport Enables Neuron-to-Neuron Propagation of Human Coronavirus OC43

A Mouse Model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Pathogenesis

The olfactory route is a potential way for SARS-CoV-2 to invade the central nervous system of rhesus monkeys

Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 Entry Proteins, ACE2 and TMPRSS2, in Cells of the Olfactory Epithelium: Identification of Cell Types and Trends with Age

Olfactory epithelium histopathological findings in long-term coronavirus disease 2019 related anosmia

Innate immune signaling in the olfactory epithelium reduces odorant receptor levels: Modeling transient smell loss in COVID-19 patients

Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters

Non-cell-autonomous disruption of nuclear architecture as a potential cause of COVID-19-induced anosmia

Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Olfactory Mucosa Result in COVID-19 Induced Anosmia

More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis

Six month follow-up of self-reported loss of smell during the COVID-19 pandemic

Parosmia after COVID-19: Olfactory training, neuroinflammation and distortions of smell

The UGT2A1/UGT2A2 locus is associated with COVID-19-related loss of smell or taste

Visualizing in deceased COVID-19 patients how SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory and olfactory mucosae but spares the olfactory bulb

Odorant signal termination by olfactory UDP glucuronosyl transferase

The authors declare no conflict of interest.Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 449