key: cord-0714303-p3m6ywha authors: Gavin, Dominic J.; Wilkie, Bruce D.; Tay, Jia; Loveday, Benjamin P. T.; Furlong, Timothy; Thomson, Benjamin N. J. title: Assessing the risk of viral infection from gases and plumes during intra‐abdominal surgery: a systematic scoping review date: 2020-08-17 journal: ANZ J Surg DOI: 10.1111/ans.16242 sha: e4dfc7cf55d16b89d55b0172b8db0135f1180bdd doc_id: 714303 cord_uid: p3m6ywha BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the current evidence regarding the risk of acquiring viral infections from gases or plumes during intra‐abdominal surgery. Peritoneal fluids may contain cellular material and virus particles. Electrocautery smoke and plumes from energy devices may aerosolize harmful substances and viral particles. Insufflation and desufflation during laparoscopic surgery may also aerosolize and distribute biological material. A systematic scoping review was performed to assess the evidence and inform safe surgical practice. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed and Medline databases was undertaken until June 2020, observing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology, to identify articles associating viral infection of operating room staff from surgical gases and plumes. All evidence levels were included. The search strategy utilized the search terms ‘surgery’, ‘laparoscopy’, ‘laparoscopic’ ‘virus’, ‘smoke’, ‘risk’, ‘infection’. RESULTS: The literature search identified 74 articles. Eight articles relevant to the subject of this review were included in the analysis, two of which specifically related to intra‐abdominal surgery. Of the remaining six, four involved gynaecological surgery and two were in‐vitro studies. No evidence that intra‐abdominal surgery was associated with an increased risk of acquiring viral infections from exsufflated gas or smoke plumes was identified. CONCLUSION: There is currently no evidence that respiratory viruses can be found in the peritoneal fluid. Whilst there is currently no evidence that desufflated carbon dioxide or surgical smoke plumes present a significant infectious risk, there is not a wealth of literature to inform current practice. Further clinical research in this area is required. The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for the global health community. In the midst of the crisis, non-urgent elective surgical operations have been cancelled and extensive preparations have been made to perform operations on patients who are suspected or proven to have contracted the virus. 1 As of April 2020, The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), The Royal College of Surgeons (UK) and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons have issued statements designed to protect the surgical workforce, and ensure that patients with surgical emergencies or time-critical surgical problems are able to access safe, evidence-based and high-quality surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. [2] [3] [4] The imperative remains to provide the same best-practice surgery undertaken pre-pandemic, in terms of caseload, technical approach and patient outcomes. The risk of acquiring viral infections from surgical gases and plumes during intra-abdominal surgery is unclear. The risk profile comparing open to laparoscopic approaches is also uncertain. It is not clear whether viruses that primarily affect the respiratory system are also shed into the peritoneal cavity; and if so, whether there is a risk that laparoscopic insufflation-desufflation under standard pressures increases the aerosolization and dissemination of infectious material in the operating theatre. This may lead to clinicians opting for open surgery over laparoscopic approaches, which in turn may have implications regarding complications and hospital length of stay. 5 It is important that decisions made about operating theatre policies, personal protective equipment and the safety of laparoscopic approaches for intra-abdominal surgery is based on evidence. Therefore, the aim of this systematic scoping review was to identify and map the current evidence regarding the risk surgical gases and plumes during intra-abdominal surgery to act as a vector for viral transmission. This review intends to clarify the nature of the existing evidence, to better inform current practice, future planning and further research in the area. This manuscript was prepared in conjunction with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement for scoping reviews. Following pilot testing, a systematic search of PubMed and Medline was undertaken for studies up to June 2020, with screening completed by two investigators. The search incorporated key words including 'virus', 'surgical smoke', 'aerosol', 'diathermy', 'electrocautery', 'laparoscopy', 'laparoscopic' and 'open surgery'. The reference lists of all studies identified by the initial search were examined to locate any potential additional studies. All studies that investigated the presence, identification or infectivity of virus or viral particles in the peritoneal cavity or in surgical smoke plumes, including those from human tissue, the peritoneal cavity, and gastrointestinal, biliary or urogenital tracts were included. All types of publications, of any language, with primary data on the study question were eligible. Studies that reported outcomes for transmission of cells and particles other than virus during intra-abdominal surgery, did not report data on infection risk associated with intra-abdominal surgery separately from other types of surgery, or not published or adequately translated into English were excluded. The initial searches were performed by one author (JT), which was verified independently by another author (BDW). All abstracts and full-text articles were considered for eligibility by two authors (DJG, BDW). Discrepancies were discussed and resolved by consensus. Data were extracted into predefined tables. Study quality and level of evidence were not formally assessed. With regards to terminology, we refer to the viral agent as the SARS-CoV-2 virus, whereas the clinical syndrome and pandemic are referred to as COVID-19. The initial literature search identified 933 articles; 859 were excluded on initial screening of titles and abstracts. Of the 74 remaining articles, 72 were published originally in English, one in Mandarin/Cantonese and one in German. The PRIMSA flow diagram is shown in Figure 1 . Eight articles that specifically assessed viral transmission from electrosurgical techniques or were related to intra-abdominal surgery were included in the final analysis (Table 1) . Two studies were specific to intra-abdominal surgery. One reported on patients who underwent robotic and laparoscopic surgery, and the other was a case report of Ebola transmission during laparotomy. 6, 7 The remaining six studies involved the collection of aerosols generated from gynaecological procedures (n = 4), and virus-infected cells tested in vitro (n = 2). In the only study investigating potential viral transmission during abdominal surgery, Kwak et al. 6 collected surgical smoke during 11 robotic and laparoscopic procedures of hepatitis B virus (HBV)positive patients of at least one-hour duration, with five cases of robotic or laparoscopic colorectal surgery, three cases of laparoscopic gastrectomy and three cases of laparoscopic hepatic wedge resections. HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was detected in surgical smoke in 91% of cases (10/11), suggesting that HBV may be transmitted via aerosols during abdominal surgery. Similarly, the case report by Khan et al. 7 describes the transmission of Ebola virus from a patient with suspected abdominal perforation to 13 health-care workers during laparotomy in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The studies involving gynaecological procedures revealed largely similar results. Sood et al. 8 collected smoke plumes from 49 patients undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and reported the presence of HPV DNA in 37% of the smoke filters. In a similar study, Neumann et al. 9 found HPV DNA in 16.7% of smoke plumes from LEEP for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of cervix. However, the potential to cause human infection was unclear in both studies. Sawchuk et al. 10 determined 57% (4/7) of smoke plume samples collected from the electrosurgical treatment of genital warts contained HPV DNA. Similar findings were demonstrated by Bergbrant et al., 11 with HPV DNA isolated from the nasolabial folds and nostrils of operators in 31.6% and 15.8%, respectively. This was also the only study to assess infective potential of aerosolised viral particles, demonstrating the transmission of infectious BPV particles from surgical plumes. Conflicting results were obtained from the in-vitro studies. Stephenson et al. 12 showed that viable P22 bacteriophage could be transferred through aerosols by using electrocautery on a P22-inoculated agarose growth media. On the contrary, Johnson et al. 13 did not detect HIV-1 in aerosol generated from electrocautery to fresh human tissue samples. This scoping review assessed the literature for evidence regarding the risk of acquiring viral infection from surgical gases and plumes during intra-abdominal surgery. We identified eight relevant articles from the literature, of which one prospective cohort study 6 and one case report 7 specifically related to intra-abdominal surgery were identified. This study highlights that there is a paucity of highquality evidence available specifically regarding the infectious risk of viral particles in the peritoneum and during intra-abdominal surgery. Further, there have been no studies that have conclusively demonstrated a risk of infection from aerosolised peritoneal fluid or diathermy smoke plumes. The only study that investigated the risk of viral transmission during intra-abdominal surgery reported the detection of HBV DNA in 91% of surgical smoke samples collected. 6 These laparoscopic or robotic operations were performed on known HBV positive patients. A single article related to open abdominal surgery was a case report of the likely transmission of Ebola virus from patient to health-care staff after laparotomy for an acute abdomen in the Democratic Republic of Congo. 7 Animal studies have shown transmission of Ebola virus through aerosols, 14 a finding yet to be demonstrated convincingly in humans. 7 Despite this, aerosolgenerating procedures are still thought to confer increased risk of human-to-human transmission, 15 as reported by Khan et al. 7 Most studies investigating the risk of intra-operative viral transmission have been focused on the treatment of genital papillomas and cervical malignancy. LEEP is commonly performed for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine cervical lesions. The studies reported in this review detected HPV in surgical smoke in 16.7-37.0% of cases during electrocautery treatment of cervical neoplasia. 8, 9 Similarly, studies focusing on the treatment of genital papillomas detected HPV DNA in surgical smoke and on operating personnel in up to 57% of cases. 10, 11 This was further supported by one in-vitro study which demonstrated transfer of viable bacteriophage within electrocautery smoke. 12 On the contrary, the in-vitro study by Johnson et al. 13 did not demonstrate the presence of HIV-1 in surgical smoke. There is an abundance of literature regarding the potential for aerosolization of viral particles from CO 2 laser treatment of warts and upper airway papillomas. CO 2 laser treatment produces larger particles than electrocautery (0.31 versus 0.07 μm, respectively), which is of greater relevance to viral transmission. 16 There is conflicting evidence for the presence of HPV DNA in CO 2 laser vapour generated during the treatment of anogenital warts [17] [18] [19] and laryngeal papillomas, 20,21 despite case studies reporting transmission of HPV infection to operating room staff. 16, 22 However, infectivity by laser plume containing bovine papillomavirus was demonstrated by the development of cutaneous tumours after inoculation of calves with BPV obtained from laser smoke plume. 23 Although laser techniques have been utilized in urological and gynaecological procedures, 24, 25 it has no routine use in intra-abdominal surgery. This conflicting evidence raises the concern for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during intra-abdominal procedures. SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from the airways, upper and lower gastrointestinal canal, respiratory secretions, blood, bile and faecal matter. 26- 28 Wang et al. 27 identified, using electron microscopy, 'live' SARS-CoV-2 in polymerase chain reaction-positive stool samples of five patients, suggesting potential for faecal transmission. On the contrary, Wolfel et al. 28 did not identify infectious virus from stool samples despite high SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid concentrations. To date, SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated from peritoneal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid or urine. HBV was reported to be present in surgical smoke produced during laparoscopic and robotic intra-abdominal surgery. 6 It is worth noting that HBV is relatively robust and may better survive electrosurgical temperatures than members of the coronavirus family, with 29 Therefore, specific implications for SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. Despite this paucity of evidence, there is concern regarding the theoretical risk of viral transmission during abdominal surgery. Both open and laparoscopic procedures generate aerosolised particles, with some evidence that laparoscopic procedures produce higher concentrations of particles with electrocautery than open techniques. 30 In addition, the issue of increased aerosol generation during the establishment and exsufflation of artificial pneumoperitoneum has also been raised. 31 The most recent guideline from the SAGES suggests that strong consideration be given to the potential for viral transmission during surgery, but concedes there is little to no evidence regarding the risk of transmission during minimally invasive surgery. 2 Similarly, the 'Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID' statement suggests that laparoscopic surgery should only be considered in select patients where the benefit of a minimally invasive approach outweighs the risk of viral transmission. 32 This presents a dilemma for surgeons and their patients. Considering the potential for increased risk of viral transmission during laparoscopic procedures, clinicians may modify their usual operative approaches. This may inadvertently affect patient outcomes and increase hospital length of stay during a time where exposure to hospital environments should be limited, 33 a view also supported by the SAGES guidelines. 2 Recent recommendations suggest that the optimal surgical approach is one that will be completed in the shortest time possible and one that is most familiar to the clinician. 31 This view is supported by authors from China and Italy, who suggest that extra precautions should be taken peri-and intra-operatively to reduce transmission risk during laparoscopic surgery rather than abandon it altogether. 1 This scoping review has some limitations. Scoping reviews are not intended to make judgements of the quality of evidence presented, which makes it difficult to draw generalisable conclusions and inform direct changes in clinical practice. There were no studies that directly addressed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from surgical gases and plumes, and therefore it is not possible to address this specific concern based on primary evidence. This review highlights a lack of evidence regarding the risk of acquiring respiratory viral infections from surgical gases or plumes during laparoscopic or open intra-abdominal operations. If this is not addressed, there will be ongoing concerns regarding the risks of performing abdominal surgery on patients who are suspected or proven COVID-19 positive both now and in the future. Further research must be conducted to determine if SARS-CoV-2 is present in peritoneal fluid and if it is able to be aerosolised during operations. None declared. Minimally invasive surgery and the novel coronavirus outbreak SAGES and EAES Recommendations Regarding Surgical Response to COVID-19 Crisis -SAGES. SAGES. 2020 The Surgical Royal Colleges of the United Kingdom and Ireland. Guidance for Surgeons Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic -The Surgical Royal Colleges of the United Kingdom and Ireland Royal Australian College of Surgeons. RACS Guidelines for the Management of Surgical Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of laparoscopic versus open surgery on hospital costs for colon cancer: a populationbased retrospective cohort study Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery The reemergence of Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Democratic Republic of the Congo Human Papillomavirus DNA in LEEP Plume Is surgical plume developing during routine LEEPs contaminated with high-risk HPV? A pilot series of experiments Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection Polymerase chain reaction for monitoring human papillomavirus contamination of medical personnel during treatment of genital warts with CO 2 laser and electrocoagulation The presence of P22 bacteriophage in electrocautery aerosols Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) in the vapors of surgical power instruments Transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to uninfected control monkeys in a biocontainment laboratory Ebola virus shedding and transmission: review of current evidence Surgical smoke: a review of the literature Low risk of contamination with human papilloma virus during treatment of condylomata acuminata with multilayer argon plasma coagulation and CO 2 laser ablation Risk of papillomavirus infection in carbon dioxide laser treatment of genital lesions Carbon dioxide laser energy disperses human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid onto treatment fields Is papillomavirus detectable in the plume of laser-treated laryngeal papilloma? Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts Larynxpapillomatose -erstmalige Anerkennung als Berufskrankheit bei einer OP-Schwester Viral disease transmitted by laser-generated plume (aerosol) Laser ablation as focal therapy for prostate cancer The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Use of Lasers in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical%20-% 20Training/Use-of-lasers-in-obstetrics-and-gynaecology(C-Trg-4)-Nov17. pdf?ext=.pdf 26. SAGES. Resources for Smoke & Gas Evacuation During Open, Laparoscopic, and Endoscopic Procedures Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS coronavirus Characterization of smoke generated during the use of surgical knife in laparotomy surgeries Protecting surgical teams during the COVID-19 outbreak: a narrative review and clinical considerations Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19 UPDATE Covid 19 pandemic and gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: knowns and unknowns. Facts Views Vis