key: cord-0712583-afwop7jj
authors: Alene, Muluneh; Yismaw, Leltework; Assemie, Moges Agazhe; Ketema, Daniel Bekele; Gietaneh, Wodaje; Birhan, Tilahun Yemanu
title: Serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
date: 2021-03-11
journal: BMC Infect Dis
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-05950-x
sha: 793e6a39b41863f36dc1112c766c637ddd3a845c
doc_id: 712583
cord_uid: afwop7jj

BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiological parameters that determine the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 is essential for public health intervention. Globally, a number of studies were conducted to estimate the average serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19. Combining findings of existing studies that estimate the average serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19 significantly improves the quality of evidence. Hence, this study aimed to determine the overall average serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA checklist to present this study. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out from international electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) by two experienced reviewers (MAA and DBK) authors between the 1st of June and the 31st of July 2020. All observational studies either reporting the serial interval or incubation period in persons diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in this study. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I(2) and Higgins test. The NOS adapted for cross-sectional studies was used to evaluate the quality of studies. A random effect Meta-analysis was employed to determine the pooled estimate with 95% (CI). Microsoft Excel was used for data extraction and R software was used for analysis. RESULTS: We combined a total of 23 studies to estimate the overall mean serial interval of COVID-19. The mean serial interval of COVID-19 ranged from 4. 2 to 7.5 days. Our meta-analysis showed that the weighted pooled mean serial interval of COVID-19 was 5.2 (95%CI: 4.9–5.5) days. Additionally, to pool the mean incubation period of COVID-19, we included 14 articles. The mean incubation period of COVID-19 also ranged from 4.8 to 9 days. Accordingly, the weighted pooled mean incubation period of COVID-19 was 6.5 (95%CI: 5.9–7.1) days. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the weighted pooled mean serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19 were 5.2, and 6.5 days, respectively. In this study, the average serial interval of COVID-19 is shorter than the average incubation period, which suggests that substantial numbers of COVID-19 cases will be attributed to presymptomatic transmission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05950-x.

The 2019 Coronavirus Disease continues to be one of the potential clinical and public health issues in the global population [1] . Globally, from the outbreak of the virus up to August 5, 2020, 18 million total confirmed cases and 700, 000 deaths were reported [2] . Rapid spread of COVID-19 causes an enormous impact on social, economic and health care system in the world [3] . Effective treatment to block the spread of COVID-19 is not developed yet, hence countries implement non-treatment intervention such as social distancing, isolation, face mask and quarantine to reduce its rapid transmission [4, 5] .

Existing evidence showed that most of the COVID-19 cases are missed by screening due to they are unaware they were exposed, and not developed symptoms yet [5] . In the absence of strong public health interventions, preliminary estimates showed that the basic reproduction number of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronovirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) ranged from 2.8 to 5.5 [6] . Serial interval and incubation period are the two main epidemiological parameters that determine the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases [7] . Serial interval is defined as the time from illness onset in the primary case to illness onset in the secondary case, while incubation period is the time from infection occurred to the onset of signs and symptoms.

Previous studies reported that the average serial interval of COVID-19 is shorter than the average incubation period, which suggests that a substantial proportion of presymptomatic transmission [8, 9] . This makes it difficult to trace contacts due to the rapid turnover of case generations. An observational study that aimed to provide the epidemiological parameters of COVID-19 using seven countries data revealed that the mean incubation period and serial interval were 7.44 days and 6.70 days, respectively [10] . A study that compares the incubation period of SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) reported that no observable difference in the incubation was noted between them [11] .

Globally, a number of studies were conducted to estimate the average serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19. However, the reported estimate of serial interval and incubation period in these fragmented studies vary depending on the number of study participants recruited, the type of design employed, the data collection period, and the country in which the study conducted. Combined findings of existing studies significantly strengthen the quality of evidence investigating the average estimate of serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19. Thus, this meta-analysis was aimed to determine the overall pooled mean serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19 using available evidences. The findings of this study are intended to improve policies and strategies for better prevention and control of COVID-19.

We identified relevant studies through searching electronic databases and gray literatures. Additionally, we were searched from the reference lists of all the included studies to identify any other studies that may have been missed by our search strategy.

We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist for this study [12] . A comprehensive search strategy was performed from international electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, CINA HL, and Cochrane Library) by two experienced review (MAA and DBK) authors between 1st of June and the 31st of July 2020. The following searching terms are used from the above databases: "serial interval" OR "generation time" AND "incubation period" OR "infectious period" AND "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "novel coronavirus".

All observational studies either reporting the serial interval or incubation period of COVID-19.

Worldwide.

All age group.

All published and unpublished articles.

Only studies reporting using the English language.

Published from the 1st of January 2020 to the 30th of June, 2020.

Articles that were not fully accessed after at least two email contacts of the principal investigator were excluded. In addition, we excluded case reports, letters, and review articles.

The eligibility assessment was undertaken by two (WG and TYB) authors, independently. The disagreement between two reviewers were fixed by consensus.

This study has two outcome variables. The first is the average estimate of serial interval. The serial interval is defined as the time from illness onset in the primary case to illness onset in the secondary case. It also measured from pairs of cases with a clear infector-infectee relationship. The second outcome variable is the average estimate of the incubation period. Incubation period is defined as the time from infection occurred to the onset of signs and symptoms. It was measured with cases of a well-defined period of exposure and symptom onset. Screening of studies and all essential data from the included studies were extracted independently by two (MA and LY) of the authors. This form includes the last name of the first author, country, data collection period, sample size, average estimate, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals. The same data extraction form was used for both outcomes. Discrepancies between the two reviewers was resolved by consensus involving all authors.

Two experienced reviewers (MA and DBK) were assessed the risk of bias of the included articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for crosssectional studies was used to evaluate the quality of studies [13] . This tool includes three categories with a maximum score of 9 points. The first is the "selection" category, which accounts for a maximum of 4 points, the second is the "Comparability" category, which accounts for a maximum of 2 points, and the third is "outcome" which accounts a maximum of 3 points. Based on the composite score from this three categories, the studies were classified as good quality if the score ≥ 6 points, fair quality 2 to 5 points inclusively and poor quality ≤1 point.

A meta-analysis of continuous outcomes was employed for this study. We analyzed the data sets for each outcome variable (serial interval and incubation period). After extracting all essential data using Microsoft Excel, data were exported to R 4.0.2 statistical software for meta-analysis. In order to pool the results of included studies in a consistent format, we estimated the sample mean and standard deviation for studies that report median and interquartile range [14] . To determine the extent of variation between the studies, we did a heterogeneity test using the Higgins method, that was quantified by I 2 value [15] . Weighted average using the inverse variance method was used to estimate the pooled average. A random-effect meta-analysis with an estimation of DerSimonian and Laird method was performed. The publication bias was also assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's tests [16] . The pooled average estimates with 95%CI confidence interval was presented using forest plots. Figure 1 indicates the overall flow of study selection, literature search and number of the included studies. During electronic literature search 14,247 articles were identified and 14, 140 duplicated articles were removed. After meticulous review of the whole articles, 28 studies that fulfill the suitability standards were included. From the included studies, a single study might report both outcomes (serial interval and incubation period). Accordingly, a total of 23 and 14 studies were combined to estimate the mean serial interval, and incubation period of COVID-19, respectively.

All the included studies are cross-sectional, and half of them were preprints. Majority of studies included in this study are conducted in China. We included a total of 23 articles to pool the mean of serial interval of COVID-19. The minimum and maximum pairs of COVID-19 patients among the included studies were 6 [17] and 1407 [18] , respectively. Among the included studies, the mean serial interval of COVID-19 was ranged from 4. 2 days [19] to 7.5 days [17] (Table 1) .

Similarly, to pool the mean incubation period of COVID-19, a total of 14 articles were included. Among those, the minimum sample size was 10 [17] and the maximum was 183 [20] . The mean incubation period of COVID-19 ranged from 4.8 days [20] to 9 days [19] ( Table 2) .

In this study, a total of 3924 pairs of COVID-19 patients were included to pool the mean serial interval. Accordingly, the weighted overall mean serial interval of COVID-19 was 5.2 (95%CI: 4.9-5.5) days (Fig. 2) . Likewise, a total of 1, 453 COVID-19 patients were included to pool the overall incubation period of COVID-19. Consequently, the weighted pooled mean incubation period of COVID-19 was 6.5 (95%CI: 5.9-7.1) days (Fig. 3) .

Of the included studies to pool the mean serial interval of COVID-19, our summary quality assessment showed that nearly three-fourth (73.9%) of the studies had a good quality (Table S1) . Similarly, among the included studies to pool the mean incubation period of COVID-19, about 71.4% of studies had a good quality (Table S2) . We assessed the issue of publication bias by visual inspection of funnel plot and by using Egger's regression test. Though the funnel plot looks asymmetrical the Egger's test showed that no relationship between the effect size and its precision (Fig. 4 ).

The current study has two main objectives. The first objective is to determine the overall mean serial interval of COVID-19. In this study, we found that the weighted pooled mean serial interval of COVID-19 was 5.2 (95%CI: 4.9-5.5) days. This result is consistent with a study conducted in China [21] , which reported that the mean serial interval of 5. 35 (95%CI: 4:63; 6:07) days. Another systematic review and meta-analysis study that combines 11 studies reported that the mean serial interval of 5.19 (95%CI: 4.37, 6.02) [22] . A study that compares the epidemiology of COVID-19, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV showed that COVID-19 had a short serial interval than SARS and MERS [23] . In addition, the pooled mean serial interval of COVID-19 obtained in this study is shorter than the mean serial interval of MERS and SARS reported in South Korea, and Singapore [24, 25] .

The second objective of this study was to determine the overall mean incubation period of COVID-19. Consequently, the weighted pooled mean incubation period of COVID-19 was found 6.5 (95%CI: 5.9-7.1) days. This result is consistent with a study conducted in Hong Kong [26] . A result obtained from a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis showed that median incubation period of COVID-19 is 5.1 (95% CI: 4.5-5.8) days. Furthermore, the average incubation period of COVID-19 obtained in this study is longer than the average incubation period of SARS that reported in Toronto, Hong Kong, and Beijing [24, 27] . In addition, the average incubation period of COVID-19 obtained in the current study is longer than a systematic review study that reported the average incubation period of SARS [28] .

Moreover, the average incubation period of COVID-19 obtained in the current study is longer than the mean incubation period of MERS reported in Hong Kong, and the Middle East [29, 30] . The possible explanation for this result might be the associations between shorter incubation periods and greater severity of infectious disease [31] . A longer incubation period was associated with a reduction in the risk of death [32] . The estimated fatality rate of COVID-19, SARS, and MERS are 2.3, 9.5, and 34.4%, respectively [33] [34] [35] . Conversely, another study showed that there is no observable difference between the incubation periods for SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and MERS-CoV. This study reported that the estimated incubation periods for SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV were 4.9, 4.7, and 5.8 days, respectively [11] .

In the current study, we included more studies by making longer searching date than the previous published articles. As the number of studies in meta-analysis increases, the power of estimating the pooled serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19 will be improved.

The current study has a number of limitations. Firstly, the overall estimate of serial interval and incubation period were computed with in a considerable heterogeneity. The source of heterogeneity might be difference in study population, data collection period, and method of analysis. Secondly, the majority of the included studies had relatively small study participants which may decrease the power of the study. Thirdly, the review was limited to only articles published in the English language. Lastly, since the included articles are limited to few countries, it may not represent the global figure.

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the weighted pooled mean serial interval and incubation period of COVID-19 were 5.2, and 6.5 days, respectively. The average serial interval of COVID-19 is shorter than the average incubation period, which suggests that substantial numbers of COVID-19 cases will be attributed to presymptomatic or asymptomatic transmission. 

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi. org/10.1186/s12879-021-05950-x.

Additional file 1: Table S1 . Assessing the risk of bias for the included studies to estimate the pooled avarage of serial interval of COVID-19, 2020.

Additional file 2: Table S2 . Assessing the risk of bias for the included studies to estimate the pooled avarage incubation period of COVID-19, 2020.

WHO. Media briefing on COVID-19 -2020

COVID-19. Dashboard by the

The global economic outlook during the covid-19 pandemic: a changed world

Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review

Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19

Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV: early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic predictions

Transmission dynamics, serial interval and epidemiology of COVID-19 diseases in Hong Kong under different control measures

Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections

Incubation period and serial interval of Covid-19 in a chain of infections in Bahia Blanca (Argentina)

Epidemiological parameters of coronavirus disease 2019: a pooled analysis of publicly reported individual data of 1155 cases from seven countries

Does SARS-CoV-2 has a longer incubation period than SARS and MERS?

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Scale customized for cross-sectional studies In

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from metaanalyses

Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a metaepidemiological study

Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia

Reconstruction of transmission pairs for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in mainland China: estimation of super-spreading events, serial interval, and hazard of infection

Transmission interval estimates suggest pre-symptomatic spread of COVID-19

Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study

Meta-analysis of several epidemic characteristics of COVID-19

Estimates of serial interval for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Insight into 2019 novel coronavirus-an updated intrim review and lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV

Preliminary epidemiological assessment of MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea

Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome

Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong

A comparative epidemiologic analysis of SARS in Hong Kong, Beijing and Taiwan

Incubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: a systematic review

MERS transmission and risk factors: a systematic review

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibility

Incubation period duration and severity of clinical disease following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

Association between severity of MERS-CoV infection and incubation period

COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related?

Comparison of confirmed COVID-19 with SARS and MERS cases-clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, radiographic signs and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A comparison of mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19, SARS, and MERS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

We would like to thank primary authors.

Authors' contributions MA, LY, and MAA: conceived the design; DBK and WG develop the search strategy; MA, LY, MAA and TYB: searched, screened, and appraised the studies, and extract the data: MA analyze the data; MAA, LY, MAA and TYB: drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Not applicable.

All the materials and data on which the findings of this review based are presented within the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable.

Not applicable. Competing interests