key: cord-0712068-77jz6p2v authors: Taibah, Hassan; Arlikatti, Sudha; Andrew, Simon A.; Maghelal, Praveen; DelGrosso, Bill title: Health Information, Attitudes and Actions at Religious Venues: Evidence from Hajj Pilgrims date: 2020-09-24 journal: Int J Disaster Risk Reduct DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101886 sha: 7674e548f5a008295b9ef72266d31b3244a031b5 doc_id: 712068 cord_uid: 77jz6p2v Mass gatherings for sporting events, music shows, and religious needs continue to grow in our urban areas, requiring local authorities to develop safety procedures to mitigate the challenges of keeping the attendees safe. These challenges are even more pronounced at pilgrimage venues where social distancing and contact avoidance are difficult as pilgrims are required to perform various rituals in close proximity with others, in a sequential manner, either daily or weekly, as per their religious tenets. Over two million pilgrims attend the Hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia annually. Keeping the local and visiting pilgrims safe from crowd crush, sunstroke, skin infections, recurrence of prior medical issues, and contagious diseases requires the Saudi government to allocate huge investments for health communication and prevention programs every year. However, there is no evidence to date that has empirically tested whether Hajj pilgrims’ are able to receive such information and are subsequently adopting various health promoting behaviors. This study aims to do that by framing it within the Health Belief Model. Data collected and analyzed from 245 pilgrims in Makkah between September 9(th)-19(th), 2017 suggests that roughly 48% of the pilgrims adopted all five protective measures. However, language barriers, limited health care facilities, and difficulties in purchasing prescription mediciens were cited as impediments to adopting healthy measures.The study concludes with recommendations for the KSA government agencies, Hajj authorities, Mission authorities and pilgrims, during various phases of travel-- i.e. pre-travel, during the pilgrimage and post-travel, in light of new emerging health threats. There is a worldwide increase in the number of mass gatherings (MGs) for sporting events, music shows, political and religious events. These have "the potential to strain the planning and response resources of the country or community" [40] , requiring local authorities and event managers to develop health safety procedures to keep the attendees safe from crowd crush and the spread of infectious diseases [1, 2, 3] . These challenges are even more pronounced at pilgrimage venues where social distancing and contact avoidance are difficult to implement and maintain because pilgrims are required to perform various rituals in close proximity with others over a short time frame, either daily or on a weekly basis, in a very prescribed format, as per their religious tenet. Every year millions of Catholics embark on a pilgrimage to attend the Papal Mass for Christmas (in December) or Easter (varies between March-April); over 30-40 million Hindu devotees visit the Sabarimala temple in Kerala; millions attend the Hindu Kumbhmela festival and pilgrimage held once in 12 years; and the Muslim pilgrims embark on the annual Hajj pilgrimage. These are made during prescribed dates and months, making these venues extremely prone to the spread of infectious diseases, respiratory diseases and gastrointestinal diseases, due to poor sanitary conditions from overcrowding, and the risk of crowd crush/ stampede [10, 11, 40] . For example, in 2014 Joseph et al. [41] queried doctors at the site of the Sabarimala shrine. The pilgrimage is made on foot by thousands during a prescribed month, through treacherous hilly terrain and forest lands. A risk prioritization index demonstrated that human stampedes and person-to-person communicable diseases were the highest threats to pilgrims. Where pilgrims are often required to make trans-continental travel, they can become both victims, or carriers of infectious diseases, or common food borne infections like Salmonella and cholera. For example in 1987, Meningococcal disease was contracted by Hajj pilgrims while in Saudi Arabia and transmitted back to their home countries [14] . J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Thus, it becomes important for pilgrims to understand the health related threats they are likely to face before they embark on their travels, so that they can take protective actions during pretravel, at the venue during the pilgrimage, and post-travel back in their home country. They need to be part of a detection capability in surveillance networks, and also individually take on the responsibility of preventing the spread of diseases. However, this is not always the case. Hamer and Conner [15] studied the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of American travelers related to health risks prior to their travel to developing nations. They found that KAP for American travelers was very low and mostly limited to the acquiring a visa for travel. When asked to assess the risk of contracting Malaria infection, respondents' based their risk perception on the country of travel. A majority were intent on practicing preventative measures including covering skin, using air conditioning, limiting drinking tap water, and using insect repellents. However, only a small percentage traveling to high risk areas were carrying anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis. Surprisingly, even though 74% agreed that vaccines could prevent infections from influenza and other such preventable infections, few sought pre-travel health care advise to enhance their health risk knowledge. A majority (82%) simply presumed that treatments would be available at their destination [15] . This last factor is alarming especially if the venues are overcrowded and creates unique challenges for the health care sector in host nations that need to surge capacity of health facilities to meet the needs of the religious tourist population. This study is focused on expanding understanding of health information, attitudes and actions of Hajj pilgrims to Makkah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), as it is the most crowded and complicated annual event in the world. Every year over 2 million believers, from more than 140 countries congregate over s few days to perform religious rituals and are faced with unique health and safety challenges including crowd crush, heatstroke and infectious diseases [6, 7, 8, 9, 10] . Despite huge built infrastructure investments year in and year out by the Saudi government, to reduce overcrowding and crowd crush accidents and technological enhancements for crowd monitoring and management, pilgrims continue to be wary. The memories of a stampede in 2004 that killed over 250, another in 2006 that claimed 360 lives, and one in 2015 near the Al Jamarat Bridge in the Mina shrine area that killed 769 pilgrims and injured hundreds, are still fresh in their memories. Furthermore, in 2013, over a million of these pilgrims (local and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f international) visited Makkah's health care facilities, predominantly complaining of crowd crush related injuries or cardiovascular problems [11, p. 899 ]. To ensure the safety and security of Hajj pilgrims, the Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) is investing in health promotion materials and suggesting preventative measures that pilgrims can take. These include requiring a medical check-up before embarking on the journey, getting the required vaccinations, carrying personal medical equipment and medications for chronic illnesses, eating healthy food, avoiding heatstroke by using an umbrella and staying hydrated, using hand sanitizer, masks and washing frequently and limiting smoking in public places etc. Although the MOH focuses on more recent contagious diseases and viruses like MERS, Corona and Ebola, it also reminds visitors of the risks from lesser known diseases like Cholera, Meningitis, Yellow fever, Rift Valley fever, and Dengue fever etc. [13] . Research in health promotion and communication have consistently highlighted how "planned, persuasive messaging and communication campaigns can change awareness and health behavior within populations" [12, p.39] . Hence, as part of their health awareness initiative in 2016, the MOH also distributed roughly 2 million health awareness information fliers, 716 Roll-up signs, 767 banners, 5,298 posters, 10 Uni-pole signs (i.e. large billboard type signs placed atop a very high pole typically on highways), 4 billboard trucks and 125 televisions placed strategically in public places. They also handed out 47,800 disposable filter masks to protect against particulate pollutants like gases, as well as bacteria and viruses, 70,640 hand sanitizers, 68,960 umbrellas to protect against the daytime summer temperatures of over 40 °C (104 °F), 9,770 'Your Health in Hajj and Umrah' booklets, and text messages to all cellphones in use at Hajj sites. The ministry further disseminated information on official social media sites as well as more traditional Public Service Announcements (PSAs) on various television and radio channels [13] . However achieving compliance from pilgrims is often difficult because they are from underdeveloped, developing and developed countries with varying risk perceptions, threat knowledge and protective action capacities and attitudes. To date there have been no studies that enquire what health related threats concern foreign Hajj pilgrims visiting Saudi Arabia, how they typically seek information to be better prepared against J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f these threats, and what economic, social, language and cultural barriers they face. This study does that and presents findings from 245 Hajj pilgrims surveyed in 2017. It uses the Health Belief Model to examine what factors influence pilgrims' choice of risk communication channels and their decisions to take protective actions. The subsequent sections begin with a description of the Health Belief Model which is used as the theoretical framework for this study and the survey research questions generated. Following this, the methods section elaborates on the convenience sampling strategy and surveying of both English and Arabic speaking pilgrims. The descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses and Cramér's V post-tests provide key findings that suggest associations between significant perceived health threats---crowd crush and pre-existing health conditions and popular preventative measures---bringing prescription drugs from home, getting vaccinated, maintaining personal hygiene and washing hands. The discussions and conclusions highlight policy implications for practitioners including Hajj authorities and travel and tours operators in the host and sending nations. Pilgrims become functionally dependent on the national and local governments in host countries to ensure safe lodging, transportation, food, water, security, and a functioning health care system. These agencies face the challenge of meeting the needs of this surge population, while maintaining the standard of care for their own citizens. They do this with the support of multimedia information and education campaigns. However, public health literature suggests that such efforts by government agencies often fail because recipients of this information fail to adopt health-promoting actions either due to not understanding the information, or facing economic or access challenges. In the 1950s the Health Belief Model (HBM) was developed by social psychologists Hochbaum, Rosenstock and Kegels working at the U.S. Public Health Services [23] to further understand this phenomenon, and is among one of the first theories postulating factors that influence the adoption of healthy behavior by individuals. The HBM model explains the nuanced relationship between environmental health and safety education and protective action adoption [24] . It suggests that both intrinsic factors related to oneself and extrinsic factors related to one's environment, influences a person's acceptance of J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f health information advice and associated protective actions. Since then the HBM framework has been used in various health promotion programs in the US with success and has been influential in changing individuals' perceptions towards vaccines, cancer screening, and exercising etc. It has been tested and empirically supported by many studies [17, 18] and remains "one of the most widely used social cognitive models in health behavior research" [19: p.2] . For example, Babazadeh et al. [20] conducted a cross-sectional study using HBM based questionnaire to test the key cognitive determinants of cervical cancer Screening Behavior (CCSB). The authors interviewed 280 housewives and found that those who believed they would benefit from such early screening and detection tests and had few barriers in accessing the screening and had high self-confidence were more likely to opt for such a preventive screening measure. Razmara et al. [22] used HBM to explore what prompted safe driving behavior in Iran. They sampled 184 taxi drivers and found that external cues and perceived benefits inspired drivers to adopt safe driving behavior while perceived barriers deterred such behavior. Therefore, the authors recommend using advertisements and campaigns to highlight the critical role of safe driving behavior and modification of barriers. As shown in Figure 1 , HBM has several components that explain the likelihood of a person engaging in health promoting behavior. The first is perceived threat which is influenced by perceived seriousness and perceived susceptibility [22, 25] . Perceived seriousness is the degree of danger as well as the consequences of that danger that individuals believe they will encounter from a health issue. In other words, it is the perception of how badly the threat or illness will affect an individual's health. HBM posits that people who think seriously about a certain health issue tend to be involved in behavior to prevent or reduce that health threat. For instance, individuals are not worried about catching the common cold but definitely worried if a lifethreatening disease like the Ebola virus is spreading in various parts of the world. Also, people are more serious about catching a cold during the work week as it impedes productivity, and not so much during holidays. On the other hand, perceived susceptibility is a subjective evaluation of the extent to which individuals believe that they are prone to a certain disease either due to inherent physiological weaknesses due to age or prior illnesses, which leads them to be involved in proactive health promotional behavior. Perceived benefits is another component that refers to the value or efficacy of engaging in a health promoting behavior. For instance, individuals who think that a flu shot will most likely prevent them from getting sick will be more likely to get the shot [21, 23] . Perceived barriers on the other hand are the likely obstacles that individuals may encounter in attempting to prevent or reduce potential risk. These can be a combination of monetary, capability or accessibility barriers, which make it less likely for someone to be involved in health promoting behavior [19, 26] . Individuals' make proactive behavioral changes when the perceived benefits trump perceived barriers including cost and access to medications, drugs' side effects and availability [23] . The HBM conceptual diagram highlights this interconnectedness by presenting both elements in one box. The HBM also considers certain modifying variables that refer to individual demographic characteristics such as age, gender and ethnicity, psychosocial characteristics such as personality and social class, and structural variables such as previous information and/or experiences with a disease. It assumes that these variables indirectly affect the engagement in health promoting activities by affecting the perceived seriousness, susceptibility, benefits, and barriers [23] . Cues to Action is the component that focuses on individuals' perceptions of any signal as an indication of the onset of a hazard [19, 26] . These cues are necessary to trigger or motivate individuals to act. Cues can be internal (such as pain and symptoms), or external (such as risk information received through various channels). The assumption is that raising awareness of a disease mitigates health risks because higher awareness leads to intelligent decisions [24] . Finally, Rosenstock, Strecher and Becker [27] added the Self-efficacy component to HBM to make it more accurate in describing individuals' differences. This component refers to the level of self-confidence that individuals have in their ability to take a successful action. HBM posits that individuals who are highly confident in their ability to prevent or reduce potential risk from a disease will be more likely to engage in health promoting behavior. The review of literature pertaining to the theoretical underpinnings of the HBM helped generate the following research questions related to the experiences of Hajj 2017 pilgrims. • RQ1: What actions do pilgrims take or are willing to take to ensure their good health during Hajj? (Perceived Benefit) • RQ2: Which health threats---whether pre-existing or emerging during Hajj---did pilgrims (Perceived perceive to be serious and requiring the adoption of health-promoting actions? • RQ3: What are the barriers/ perceived challenges that pilgrim's encounter when attempting to prevent or reduce the health risks during Hajj? (Perceived Barriers) • RQ4: What are the internal and external cues that prompt pilgrims to take healthpromoting actions to reduce the potential of health risks during Hajj? (Cues for Action) • RQ5: How can pilgrims' perceptions of self-capacity or capability influence their willingness to take health-promoting actions? (Self-Efficacy) In the summer of 2017 (September 9-19) a research team comprising of the lead author and five surveyors with bilingual capabilities (Arabic and English only), commenced data collection. The team adopted a convenience sampling strategy to identify and collect responses from 245 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f pilgrims willing pilgrims milling around in the central marketplace or various lodges of Makkah City in Saudi Arabia or in lodges and hotels. Such as sampling strategy was adopted because a population based probability sampling technique would have been very costly, time intensive and challenging. The Hajj pilgrims population is unique as the total number of pilgrims visiting in a given year is ever changing, and socio-demographic characteristics including nationalities, income, and language proficiencies are different (more than 140 countries), making it is difficult to bring clarity in defining the target population to conduct probability sampling [42] . Two versions of the semi-structured quantitative survey instrument, one in English and the other translated into Arabic, were used. The survey instrument was pretested and fine-tuned to address any issues arising from translations and suggestions made by the local population. Respondents answers derived from face-to-face interactions were first hand written by the interviewers and then translated as required into English, transcribed, coded and analyzed using IBM SPSS software. Every effort was made to target pilgrims from as many nationalities as possible, notwithstanding their ability to speak one of the two languages, due to limitations of the bilingual team. This is likely to have left out the preferences of those speaking other languages and is a limitation that can be overcome in future research with a multi-lingual team. The final sample represents pilgrims from six world regions -Southeast Asia - (38 Indonesians and 18 Malaysians), South Asia (27 Indians and 43 Pakistanis), North Africa (52 Egyptians and 33 Algerians) and Europe and the Americas (34) . Pilgrims that come from these regions make up about 88.6% of the whole population (1,758,722 pilgrims) in the Hajj of 2017 [28] . Two types of questions were used to measure the research concepts. Likert scale rating type question with responses ranging from 1 = Not at all, 2 = Some extent, 3 = Great extent, and 4 = Very great extent, and binary response questions, recorded as 1 = Yes, 0 = No. Finally, a Chisquare analysis was conducted to determine the significance followed by a Cramér's V post-test to measure the relative strength of the association between the perceived seriousness of a health risk and the adoption of health promoting actions. A Cramér's V coefficient ranges from 0 to 1 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f (perfect association). In practice, even a 0.10 value, may be considered a good minimum threshold for suggesting a substantive relationship between two variables [32, 33] . The questionnaire structure for each concept measured are detailed below. The questionnaire asked respondents to report their demographic characteristics-age, gender (coded male = 0, female = 1), number of days to spend in Saudi Arabia during the visit, highest level of education (post graduate, undergraduate, some education, no education), household income (computed using a proxy of 'accommodation type i.e. whether in tents, three Star, Four Star or Five Star hotels, that a pilgrim stayed in), and Nationality. their country government's International office), and Face-to-Face from other Pilgrims. Actions -To measure subsequent decisions to take the various health promoting actions, respondents were provided with a list of five----brought medicines from country of origin, taken vaccination/s prior to travel for Hajj, were maintaining personal hygiene were using hand sanitizer, and were washing their hands. Their binary responses to taking the action or not, were recorded as 1 = Yes, 0 = No. Threats -To assess which health threats were a major concern to pilgrims, respondents were asked the extent to which (1=not at all, 2= some extent, 3= great extent, 4 = very great extent) they were concerned with five health related threats which were at the physiological level ----heatstroke, vomiting, diarrhea, pre-existing conditions, epidemics and six environment related health threats ---car accident, crowd crush. Subsequently a nominal variable was created in such a way that respondents who were 'not at all' concerned with a J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f particular health threat, was coded as '0' and concerned to 'some extent/ great extent/ very great extent' was coded as '1'. For the purposes of this paper only responses related to the first five are presented as this paper is concerned with presenting pilgrims' attitudes and health protective behavior at the individual level. to assess what were the perceived barriers that pilgrims encounter in taking health promoting actions, respondents were asked to rate the extent to which (1=not at all, 2= some extent, 3= great extent, 4 = very great extent) the six listed challenges----not enough hospitals/clinics, accessing prescription medicines, no help from service providers, language barriers, trust in service providers and expensive, were impediments. Responses that were 'not at all' was coded '0', while 'some extent/ great extent/ very great extent' was coded '1'. health-promoting actions, respondents were asked to rate the extent to which (1=not at all, 2= some extent, 3= great extent, 4 = very great extent), five internal cues--shortness of breath, sweating, rash, cough and cold, and stomachache and five external cues--information from the newspapers/TV/Radio, people wearing mask, social media, overcrowding on roads, and overcrowding in tents, prompted their actions. Individual responses that said 'not at all' by a particular internal or external was coded as '0' while 'some extent/ great extent/ very great extent' was coded as '1'. 3.2.7. Self-efficacy -to assess how can pilgrims' perceptions of self-capacity or capability influenced their willingness to take health-promoting actions a question that asked pilgrims how confident they were in their ability to take successful health protective actions was analyzed. The response was rated from (1=not at all, 2= some extent, 3= great extent, 4 = very great extent). The descriptive statistics suggest that the average age of respondents was 45 years and ranged When there is trust in an information source, there is more acceptance of the health information provided by that source and greater rate of adoption of protective behavior, to reduce one's health threat [4, 5] . This led to the tabulation of the frequency of responses (see Table 1 ) for the various channels of communication that pilgrims received health information from, during their time in Saudi Arabia. Given the responses were on a Likert scale, the central tendency was measured by computing both mean and median measures. As both reportedly fall in the same response category, the mean values are discussed further. The mean values indicate pilgrims sought information from face-to-face interactions the most (mean ranging from 2.1 to 2.3), followed by information from text messaging and billboards (mean of 2.1). Use of radio and Twitter reported the lowest means of 1.2 and 1.3 respectively. While face-to-face interactions with family, friends and other pilgrims within their tour group is inevitable and to be expected, it is worth noting that pilgrims depend on Hajj authorities, Mission authorities, and religious leaders in mosques to provide them with authentic information. Sharing this finding will be assuring to these agencies and the KSA who are expending resources annually to enhance these modes of communication. Highlighting the continued gaps created due to language barriers will likely focus attention on recruiting seasonal multi-lingual speakers to ensure the information is not limited to only English and Arabic but covers other most commonly spoken language among pilgrims. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f In response to RQ1, (What actions do pilgrims take or are willing to take to ensure their good health during the Hajj pilgrimage?), frequency responses were first tabulated (see Table 2 ). A majority of the respondents had taken at least one of the five actions listed---brought medicines from country of origin (75%), taken vaccination/s prior to travel for Hajj (80%), were maintaining personal hygiene (95%), were using hand sanitizer (77%), and were washing their hands (98%). Upon cross-tabulating the responses it was found that 48% of the respondents had adopted all five health promoting behavior (i.e. health threat preventative measures). Furthermore, statistically significant associations between the health information communication channels accessed and adoption of health promoting behavior was computed (see Table 3 ) Individuals who did not receive any information from the listed sources were coded '0' and '1' otherwise. Findings suggest that information received from Hajj and Mission authorities reported In response to RQ2, "Which health threats---whether pre-existing or new during Hajj---did pilgrims perceive to be a serious concern and requiring the adoption of health promoting , a majority of the respondents i.e. 78% noted their concerns related to getting a actions?) heatstroke, which is not surprising considering that in 2017 the Hajj pilgrimage during the unforgiving summer months (began on the evening of Wednesday, 30 August and ended the evening of Monday, 4 September) with very high temperatures. In Saudi Arabia which is a desert country the temperatures range between lows of 13°C (55°F) in January and highs of 43°C (110°F) starting from June to October. Pre-existing conditions was reported as a threat by just over 50% respondents, while vomiting was reported by 44% respondents as shown in Figure 2 . Table 4 , presents statistically significant associations between the respondents' concerns related to various health threats and the likelihood of adopting health-promoting behavior. The argument is that those who perceive the seriousness of a threat as well as the negative consequences of that threat, are far more likely to take preventative measures to enhance their good health. Perception of threats such as vomiting, diarrhea, pre-exiting conditions and epidemics are strongly to very strongly related to individual's behavior of bringing their own medicines, and getting vaccinated (0.000