key: cord-0711550-nz1jasgs
authors: Cho, Hwa Jin; Heinsar, Silver; Jeong, In Seok; Shekar, Kiran; Li Bassi, Gianluigi; Jung, Jae Seung; Suen, Jacky Y.; Fraser, John F.
title: ECMO use in COVID-19: lessons from past respiratory virus outbreaks—a narrative review
date: 2020-06-06
journal: Crit Care
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02979-3
sha: ab35e4d3c00a2bb71134c64b0671722fa525d1ac
doc_id: 711550
cord_uid: nz1jasgs

The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to grow exponentially in most countries, posing an unprecedented burden on the healthcare sector and the world economy. Previous respiratory virus outbreaks, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), pandemic H1N1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), have provided significant insights into preparation and provision of intensive care support including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Many patients have already been supported with ECMO during the current COVID-19 pandemic, and it is likely that many more may receive ECMO support, although, at this point, the role of ECMO in COVID-19-related cardiopulmonary failure is unclear. Here, we review the experience with the use of ECMO in the past respiratory virus outbreaks and discuss potential role for ECMO in COVID-19.

On December 2019, the district of Wuhan in central China announced detection of a previously undescribed virus that led to clusters of pneumonia. The disease caused by this novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was subsequently named coronavirus disease 2019, the COVID-19. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was declared as a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 30 January and a pandemic on 11 March [1] . Despite lessons learnt from previous outbreaks, the preparedness and awareness for such a transmittable virus was inadequate to stop its spread of COVID-19 to over 4,700,000 patients with crude mortality of 6.6% as of May 19 2020 [2] . The mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients remains high, and it is unclear if some of these patients may be rescued with ECMO.

There have been several viral outbreaks in recent memory, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), pandemic H1N1 influenza and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (Fig. 1) . Whilst the SARS outbreak in China in 2002 [3] caused an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome through coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] , there is minimal reported data on the use of ECMO. This was because ECMO was not commonly used at that time, even in those critically ill patients who did not respond favourably to conventional mechanical ventilation and other adjuncts [9] . There is some data on use of ECMO in MERS [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] . The 2009 H1N1 pandemic witnessed the rise of ECMO, and this in part can be attributed to the significant "age shift" with younger patients (< 65 years of age) getting more affected by the virus. Improvements in technology over time have certainly played a significant role too.

Since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, more evidence has emerged support venovenous (V-V) ECMO use in ARDS [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] . The use of venoarterial (V-A) ECMO for cardiac support is an evolving area and certainly needs further evidence. Although ECMO has a role in selected patients in context of the current pandemic, the criteria for patient selection and timing of ECMO initiation are yet to be defined. This is important to allow judicious use of available resources such resource-consumptive circumstances [21] . In this narrative review, the focus will be on the use of ECMO during previous viral outbreak as well as in COVID-19 to learn lessons regarding guidance of treatment that will benefit all of healthcare workers and patients.

Whilst significant pulmonary pathology is the hallmark of recent viral outbreaks which was respiratory, the incidence of significant injuries to cardiovascular system has also been reported.

Both H1N1 and MERS were associated with significant cardiopulmonary involvement. Although severe pneumonia and ARDS were mostly commonly seen complications, Dawood et al. conducted calculations of crude respiratory and cardiovascular mortality rates from H1N1, estimating the total attributable deaths at 200,000 and 80,000, respectively [22] . Fulminant myocarditis was reported during the H1N1 pandemic [23] ; acute myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, pericarditis and shock were also reported in patients with MERS [13, [24] [25] [26] .

In COVID-19, whilst most commonly reported pulmonary complications in critically ill patients were also pneumonia and ARDS [27] [28] [29] [30] , there are substantial concerns regarding micro-and macro-vascular complications, perhaps relating to intravascular thromboses or endothelial dysfunctions [31, 32] . Regarding cardiovascular complications, acute cardiac injury (7~17%), shock (8-7%), septic shock (20%), arrhythmia (16.7%) and heart failure (23%) were reported in hospitalised patients [27] [28] [29] [30] . There are few case reports of myopericarditis with cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion [33, 34] . Ruan et al. reported up to 7% of patients die of fulminant myocarditis and this may be a contributing factor in up to 33% of deaths [35] .

Thus, the respiratory viral outbreaks may lead to significant cardiopulmonary failure that is refractory to conventional medical management. During a pandemic, carefully selected patients may be rescued with ECMO, as it warrants excess amounts of limited assetspersonnel. Recently published Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) COVID-19 guidelines provide recommendations for ECMO use in this setting [36] . The reported complications in COVID-19 are described in Table 1 .

The spring of 2009 in Mexico saw the nascence of the first pandemic of the twenty-first century, the influenza A, H1N1 [37] . This H1N1 virus initially spread through North America, but eventually caused a global pandemic that lasted beyond the usual influenza season in the Northern Hemisphere [38, 39] .

Eight studies that reported ECMO use during H1N1 are summarised in Table 2 . H1N1-induced ARDS in 2009 resulted in the rapid uptake of ECMO use, and ECMO played an evolving role in critically ill patients [40, 48] . Pham et al. have reported factors associated with death in 123 ECMO treated patients for H1N1induced ARDS [45] . They concluded that ECMO initiation facilitated the use of ultra-protective ventilation [40] . Although a systematic review to inform decisions concerning the use of ECMO in acute respiratory failure during H1N1 pandemic was published, there was insufficient evidence to strongly recommend use of ECMO for patients with H1N1-induced acute respiratory failure [48] . However, it highlighted that in selected patients, ECMO was associated with improved outcome. Similar to H1N1-induced ARDS, patients with MERS received lung-protective mechanical ventilation and application of early prone positioning with neuromuscular blockade for patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO2:FiO2 < 150 mmHg) [52] . Approximately 6% of patients were reported to receive ECMO support as they were unresponsive to conventional treatment [13] . Alshahrani et al. conducted a retrospective chart review on 35 MERS-CoV patients with refractory respiratory failure [14] . Of these, 17 received ECMO and had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than those who received conventional oxygen therapy. We have summarised 6 studies regarding study populations during MERS and ECMO data in Table 3 , although we found limited data regarding ECMO use details during MERS outbreak.

ECMO may be considered in patients who develop severe cardiopulmonary failure due to COVID-19 which is refractory to optimal mechanical ventilation and other medical therapies [21] . We have summarised data from recently published clinical reports, ELSO registry report and EuroELSO weekly survey in Table 4 to highlight ECMO use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the early outbreak of COVID-19 in China, ECMO was employed for those unresponsive to conventional treatment. Initial reports suggested that ECMO has been used in approximately 3% of severe cases with restoration of adequate oxygenation [28] . Wang and colleagues described clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalised patients during very early stage of outbreak in Wuhan, China [28] and reported 36 intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients. Among these, 17 (47%) required mechanical ventilation and 4 (11.1%) required Additionally, ELSO registry dashboard [57] provides live updates of ECMO use for COVID-19 cases on ECMO ( Table 4 ). As of April 22, the suspected or confirmed cases were 487. Whilst 288 patients (59%) are still on ECMO, among 90 patients who discharged, 36 patients (40%) survived to discharge. ECMO support type was mostly respiratory (95%), and ECMO mode was mostly V-V (91%). Furthermore, in 4% of patients, ECMO was provided via V-A mode for cardiac and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 3% had conversion. The EuroELSO survey [58] has now reported ECMO use in over 800 patients as of April 18. Whilst V-V ECMO being the predominant modality used, 423 patients are still on ECMO, 217 patients were weaned from ECMO and 189 ECMO were discontinued due to patients' death. Further data on patient demography, clinical management aspects and outcomes are awaited. Organisations such as the International ECMO Network (www.internationalecmonet.org) will play a significant role in delivering high-quality research in ECMO.

As the COVID-19 pandemic grows, it is essential that we characterise the pathophysiology in those critically ill patients to guide management and optimise outcome. To assist in obtaining as much clinical data as possible from all ICU patients admitted with COVID-19, the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium Registry was formed in mid-January 2020 to facilitate data collection, decision support mechanisms through artificial intelligence and a vehicle for future studies regarding ventilation and treatments (ref, unpublished data). Since its initiation to end of March, more than 300 hospitals from 6 continents are participating to characterise critically ill patients and ultimately to reduce their global burden of this disease.

The experience from previous pandemics has provided preliminary guidance for ECMO use in the current pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic is unfolding at a time where the better systems for ECMO provision are developed. ECMO is now a well-organised service in many parts of the world; however, inequality remains in terms of access to ECMO. ECMO may not be a therapy that can be extensively used in such pandemic given the resource constraints and availability issues; a responsible use in selected patients is recommended. Although ECMO has a role in critically ill patients, there is currently inadequate data to determine the efficacy, optimal patient selection and management on ECMO. It is essential that we learn and understand throughout the current pandemic, in order determine the risk-benefit ratio of ECMO in COVID-19. 

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19

Accessed 22

COVID-19) World Health Organization Overview

The severe acute respiratory syndrome

A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong

Hospital Outbreak Investigation T: Investigation of a nosocomial outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Toronto

Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong

Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions

Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome

Group ftTSCC: Critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Clinical presentation and outcomes of Middle East respiratory syndrome in the Republic of Korea

Clinical implications of 5 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in a South Korean outbreak

The critical care response to a hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection: an observational study

Critically ill patients with the Middle East respiratory syndrome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Critically ill healthcare workers with the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a multicenter study

Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and posterior probability of mortality benefit in a post hoc Bayesian analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe influenza infection with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Extracorporeal life support: the next step in moderate to severe ARDS-a review and metaanalysis of the literature

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: the potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study

Myocarditis associated with influenza A H1N1pdm2009

Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia

Hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan

Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan

Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

COVID-19 complicated by acute pulmonary embolism

Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19

Life-threatening cardiac tamponade complicating myo-pericarditis in COVID-19

Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization COVID-19 Interim Guidelines

Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico

Infection and death from influenza A H1N1 virus in Mexico: a retrospective analysis

Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome

Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A(H1N1)

The Italian ECMO network experience during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic: preparation for severe respiratory emergency outbreaks

Retrieval of critically ill adults using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an Australian experience

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) severe respiratory failure in Japan

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A(H1N1)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study and propensity-matched analysis

Extracorporeal lung support in H1N1 provoked acute respiratory failure: the experience of the German ARDS Network

Predicting mortality risk in patients undergoing venovenous ECMO for ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia: the ECMOnet score

A systematic review to inform institutional decisions about the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the H1N1 influenza pandemic

Middle East respiratory syndrome

World Health Organization: MERS Situation Update

Middle East respiratory syndrome: what we learned from the 2015 outbreak in the Republic of Korea

Critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 Novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for coronavirus disease

Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a nationwide analysis in China

ELSO COVID-19 Registry Dashboard

EuroELSO Survey on ECMO use in Adult COVID-19 Patients in Europe

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Authors' contributions HJC and JFF constructed this review. HJC and SH wrote the initial manuscript. HJC was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. KS and ISJ critically evaluated the manuscript and made substantial contributions to the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors revised the initial manuscript and approved its final version.Funding HJC acknowledges the support of a grant NRF-2018R1D1A1A02085975 from the National Research Foundation of Korea and a grant BCRI18028 from the Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute.

Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

1