key: cord-0709245-taows7cf authors: Focosi, Daniele; Franchini, Massimo title: IMPACT OF PATHOGEN-REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON COVID19 CONVALESCENT PLASMA POTENCY date: 2021-03-03 journal: Transfus Clin Biol DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.02.005 sha: 08136e5be9c183bdbc0b73882a2a7fad620c8560 doc_id: 709245 cord_uid: taows7cf Pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) have been recommended by many regulatory authorities to minimize the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections associated with COVID19 convalescent plasma. While its impact on safety and its cost-effectiveness are nowadays well proven, there is theoretical concern that PRT could impact efficacy of convalescent plasma by altering concentration and/or function of the neutralizing antibodies (nAb). We review here the evidence supporting a lack of significant detrimental effect from PRTs on nAbs. Several pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) have been approved and are currently marketed. In recent years, photo-inactivation in the presence of a photosensitizer has become the standard for single donation inactivation: approved technologies include combination of methylene blue + visible light [1] (Theraflex®), amotosalen (S-59) + ultraviolet A [2] (Intercept®), and riboflavin + ultraviolet B [3] (Mirasol®). Although neither the US Food and Drug Agency (FDA) [4] nor the European Center for Disease Control (ECDC) [5] [5] [5] are mandating PRT for COVID19 convalescent plasma. The European Commission indicates that "The processing that is routinely applied in the country or blood establishment for the preparation of plasma for transfusion should be applied. Thus, pathogen reduction should be applied (to CP) if it has been the normal practice in the blood establishment and should not be introduced for this particular blood component if not normally applied for plasma for transfusion" [6] . The Working Party on Global Blood Safety of the International Society for Blood Transfusion (ISBT) initially recommended it as "highly desirable" [7] , but this position was later tempered as "the benefit of PR in the context of SARS-CoV-2 is unclear", and "most countries have elected not to implement PR specifically for convalescent plasma" [8] . Many national authorities consider that under emergency settings the donor screening and conventional viral nucleic acid testing (NAT) (i.e. HIV, HCV and HBV NAT) would not be enough to ensure convalescent plasma safety [9] : most convalescent plasma donors have no donation history, and their donations should be considered at higher risk. Under this scenario, the introduction of additional virological testing (e.g. HAV, HEV, and B19) and PRT would approximately double the final cost of the therapeutic convalescent plasma dose. Since these additional nonenveloped viruses are nevertheless inactivated by PRT, PRT has finally remained the sufficient precautionary measure [10] . Viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detectable at low viral loads in a minority of serum samples collected from patient with acute infection, but it is not associated with infectious virions [11] . Some PRT have Page 4 of 10 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 4 nevertheless been shown to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 RNA in plasma, with very similar mean log reduction of >3.32 for Intercept® [12] and up to ≥ 4.79 for Mirasol® [13, 14] . No SARS-CoV-2 inactivation data have been published for methylene blue technology (Theraflex® Methylen Blue, MacoPharma) as of now. The demonstration of the maximum inactivation capacities is limited by the maximum viral titers of the clinical isolates available :so an even higher overall inactivation capacity is to be expected (the Intercept® inactivation capacity for SARS-CoV-1 was demonstrated to be as high as ≥ 5.5 log [2] ). Given the increased risk profile of convalescent plasma donors and the highly vulnerable condition of recipients suffering from COVID19, the inactivation capacity a broad range of pathogens should be taken into account when aiming at making the convalescent plasma as safe as possible. Also in this regard large differences are apparent for the different technologies with Intercept® having the largest dataset [15] . Last but not least, the clinical experience with PR-treated plasma should be taken into account. While Intercept® treated plasma has been shown to be safe and efficacious to treat acquired or inherited coagulopathies and in therapeutic plasma exchange [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] , and also for Theraflex® Methylen Blue a series of studies have been performed, we did not find data from randomized, controlled trials for Mirasol® treated plasma. The potency of convalescent plasma can be affected by several variables, whose impact need to be formally studied. For example the type of collection (apheresis vs. recovered plasma) or storage temperature [22] have been shown not to affect the antibody content. PRT treatment is one of the main variables which needs to be assessed when manufacturing convalescent plasma. On December 7 th , we searched both peer-reviewd (PubMed and Google Scholar) and not peerreviewed (medrXiv and biorXiv) online repositories using the query: ("pathogen inactivation" OR "pathogen reduction technologies") AND ("immunoglobulins" or "neutralizing antibodies"). Table 1 Page While most studies found no significant decline [25] [26] [27] , in the largest head-to-head comparison study to date, PRT with methylene blue or with amotosalen provided the greater likelihood of preserving nAb in convalescent plasma compared to riboflavin [28] . Nevertheless, this study suffers from major methodological limitations. It is worth noting though that studies showing decrease in levels of plasma proteins, including antibodies as well as complement after PRT treatment, clearly demonstrated that remaining levels were maintained within reference levels [29, 30] . In addition to the specific antibodies, the overall retention of coagulation factors and anti-thrombotic factors is of highest interest also for the treatment of COVID19 patients. CP can include different soluble factors expected to be of special benefit such as antithrombin III [31] , decoy receptors (e.g. ACE2 + exosomes [32] ), anti-inflammatory cytokines, complement factors, or, in partially ABO-matched units, anti-A isoagglutinins) (expected to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 entry (11)), for which effect from PRT remains to be investigated [33] . PRT have been successfully used to prepare convalescent plasma which has been transfused in many clinical trials to date without any detrimental effect (namely Intercept® [27, 34, 35] , and Mirasol® ( [35] , NCT04385186)). One advantage of Mirasol® is the lower minimum required volume of convalescent plasma to be treated, namely 150 ml (vs. 385 ml in Intercept®), which makes PRT of recovered plasma or thawed apheresis aliquots possible without pooling. On the other hand, Intercept allows generation of up to 3 aliquots in the same inactivation kit, thus saving time and resources. Additionally, in-hospital-made methylene blue and light treatment has been used in a Chinese trial [36] . In conclusion, while the choice to mandate or not PRT for convalescent plasma in individual countries largely depend on pharmacoeconomics, there are enough evidences to conclude that the approach preserves potency. Further studies are needed to assess whether PRT improves the safety of convalescent plasma in regard to reduced transfusion-transmitted infections. We declare we have no conflict of interest to disclose. -2% to -4% EBOV IgG 1 [38] no significative difference in SARS-CoV-2 nAb titer 5 [25] -3.8% anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein IgG 48 [39] no difference in SARS-CoV-2 nAb titer and N-protein antibodies 110 [26] no significative difference in SARS-CoV-2 nAb titer 30 [27] among units with the initial SARS-CoV-2 nAb titre ≥ 80 : -12.7% anti-SARS-CoV-2 N-protein IgG 20 [39] among units with the initial SARS-CoV-2 nAb titre ≥ 80:  43% (26%-61%, CI) were unchanged  50% had a one-dilution decrease 140 [28]  7% had a two-dilution decrease Theraflex MB® -4.8% anti-SARS-CoV-2 N-protein IgG 22 [39] among units with the initial SARS-CoV-2 nAb titre ≥ 80 :  81% (71%-91%, CI) of units remained unchanged  19% decreased by one dilution 1401 [28] Practical limitations of convalescent plasma collection: a case scenario in pandemic preparation for influenza A (H1N1) infection. Transfusion Photochemical treatment of plasma with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light inactivates pathogens while retaining coagulation function Characterization of plasma protein activity in riboflavin and UV lighttreated fresh frozen plasma during 2 years of storage at −30°C. Vox Sanguinis FDA. Recommendations for Investigational COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and supply of substances of human origin in the EU/EEA -second update An EU programme of COVID-19 convalescent plasma collection and transfusion. Guidance on collection, testing, processing, storage, distribution and monitored use Points to consider in the preparation and transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma Guidance for the procurement of COVID-19 convalescent plasma: differences between high-and low-middle-income countries Operational protocol for donation of anti-COVID-19 convalescent plasma in Italy Protocollo operativo per la raccolta del plasma convalescente da donatore guarito da COVID19 per l'uso clinico nei pazienti affetti da COVID19 in fase attiva SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in blood products from patients with COVID-19 is not associated with infectious virus Amotosalen and ultraviolet A light treatment efficiently inactivates severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in human plasma Inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in plasma and platelet products using a riboflavin and ultraviolet light-based photochemical treatment Pathogen reduction of SARS-CoV-2 virus in plasma and whole blood using riboflavin and UV light Inactivation of a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites by photochemical treatment of plasma and platelets using amotosalen and ultraviolet A light Fresh frozen plasma prepared with amotosalen HCl (S-59) photochemical pathogen inactivation: transfusion of patients with congenital coagulation factor deficiencies A randomized, controlled Phase III trial of therapeutic plasma exchange with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) prepared with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light compared to untreated FFP in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Characterization of efficacy and safety of pathogen inactivated and quarantine plasma in routine use for treatment of acquired immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Comparative effectiveness of plasma prepared with amotosalen-UVA pathogen inactivation and conventional plasma for support of liver transplantation Amotosalen-inactivated fresh frozen plasma is comparable to solventdetergent inactivated plasma to treat thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Independent evaluation of tolerance of therapeutic plasma inactivated by amotosalen-HCl-UVA (Intercept ™) over a 5-year period of extensive delivery Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies are stable in convalescent plasma when stored at 4° Celsius for at least 6 weeks Role of IgM and IgA Antibodies in the Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. medrXiv IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 Stability and neutralising capacity of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma. The Lancet Microbe Preservation of Sars-Cov-2 Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) or Anti-Nucleocapsid Proteins (NP) in Convalescent Donor Plasma (CCP) Treated with Amotosalen/UVA Illumination (A/UVA) (P-LB-22) Convalescent plasma therapy for B-cell-depleted patients with protracted COVID-19 Impact of pathogen reduction technologies on immunological properties of the COVID-19 convalescent plasma. medrXiv Characterization of plasma protein activity in riboflavin and UV lighttreated fresh frozen plasma during 2 years of storage at −30°C. Vox Sang Treatment of blood with a pathogen reduction technology using ultraviolet light and riboflavin inactivates Ebola virus in vitro Impact of convalescent and nonimmune plasma on mortality of patients with COVID-19: a potential role for antithrombin Circulating ACE2-expressing Exosomes Block SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection as an Innate Antiviral Mechanism. biorXiv Paired analysis of plasma proteins and coagulant capacity after treatment with three methods of pathogen reduction Efficacy of COVID-19 pathogen inactivated convalescent plasma for patients with moderate to severe acute COVID19: a case matched control study Mortality reduction in 46 severe Covid-19 patients treated with hyperimmune plasma. A proof of concept single arm multicenter interventional trial Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients Characterization of Ebola convalescent plasma donor immune response and psoralen treated plasma in the United States Pathogen-reduced Ebola virus convalescent plasma: first steps towards standardization of manufacturing and quality control including assessment of Ebola-specific neutralizing antibodies How Inactivation of Pathogens in Plasma with Amotosalen and UV-A Affects the Activity of Antibodies to the New Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2? Plasma constituent integrity in pre-storage vs. post-storage riboflavin and UV-light treatment--a comparative study