key: cord-0697245-tw7zj99o authors: Wang, Yushu; Ao, Guangyu; Nasr, Basma; Qi, Xin title: Effect of antiplatelet treatments on patients with COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis date: 2021-01-13 journal: Am J Emerg Med DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.016 sha: f76b6ddf914dcb1d4a46a874791b70ed7d2572b5 doc_id: 697245 cord_uid: tw7zj99o Despite the rationale that early anti-platelet would lower the risk of major organ dysfunction, the effectiveness of this approach remains controversial. Therefore, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of antiplatelet treatments on patients with COVID-19 infection. An electronic search was carried out in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Meta-analysis and statistical analyses were completed with using the RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. A total of 9 articles representing data from 5970 participants were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed antiplatelet agents were not associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.64 to 1.50, P = 0.94; I 2 = 65%), while an adjusted analysis indicated that antiplatelet agents was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.40 to 1.06, P = 0.498; I 2 = 0%). The results of this study reveal that while there is no significant benefit on mortality demonstrated with the use of antiplatelet agents, the upper bound of the confidence interval suggests that there is unlikely to be a compelling risk of harm associated with this practice. The benefit and risk of the use of antiplatelet agents should be fully considered especially in the presence of thrombocytopenia status in patients with COVID-19. Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to an unprecedented global health crisis with over 8.5 million confirmed cases worldwide and over 107,600 deaths as of 12 October 2020. Patients with s Severe SARS-COV-2 Infection associated with sepsis, respiratory failure, heart failure, and acute kidney and cardiac injury are prone to develop multiple organ injury resulting in unsuppressed platelet activation that induces a destructive inflammation [1] . Furthermore, the interaction of activated platelets with neutrophils contributes to the degradation of extracellular matrix proteins and thrombin generation, which could relate to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and a hypercoagulable state [2] . Thus, an early anti-platelet, which inhibits uncontrolled platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activation, would lower the risk of major organ dysfunction. However, despite the rationale for antiplatelet therapy, the effectiveness of this approach remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to investigate the effect of antiplatelet treatments on patients with COVID-19 infection. An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases was conducted from inception to September 2020 with no language restrictions. The following key words and/or medical subject heading terms searched were applied: ("novel coronavirus" or "2019-nCoV" or "coronavirus disease 2019" or "SARS-CoV-2" or "COVID-19") and (antiplatelet or aspirin or ticagrelor or prasugrel or clopidogrel). A manual search of additional articles was conducted using references from related articles and published reviews to seek potentially relevant citations. Two independent investigators (YW and GA) performed the initial screening of titles and abstracts. Full-length articles of identified studies were retrieved. Studies were included if they (1) enrolled patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection; (2) provided information on antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis events in patients with severe or non-severe cases or between death and survivors; (3) the availability of an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival, or relevant clinical events from which it could be calculated. Studies were excluded if they were abstracts, conferences, editorials, or reviews. Decisions regarding eligibility were exclusively made according to pre-specified selection criteria. Any differing decision was resolved by consensus or discussion with the third investigator (XQ). Two main investigators (YW and GA) independently extracted the data and reached a consensus on all items. The following items were extracted from each study if available: name of the first author, the year of publication, study design, region, number of participants, age of patients, number of male and female participants, type of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents, and outcomes of interest. The endpoint was the effect of antiplatelet agents on mortality and disease severity of COVID-19. For non-random controlled studies, risk of bias/quality of studies was evaluated using a nine-item Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) by two investigators independently (YW and GA). If necessary, a third investigator was consulted for any discrepancies. Studies with a NOS score of ≥7 were considered high-quality studies, whereas ones with <7 were considered low-quality studies. Meta-analysis and statistical analyses were performed using the RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata 12.0 (StataCorp). Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs were used as the summary statistics for dichotomous outcomes. Cochrane chi-square test (Q test) and the I 2 statistics were calculated to detect heterogeneity, with an I 2 less than 25%, 25% to 50%, and greater than 50% corresponding to low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. In case of low level of heterogeneity (I 2 < 50%), a fixedeffect model was used, otherwise a random-effect model was used. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate a single trial's influence on overall effect estimated by sequentially excluding one study. If substantial heterogeneity was presented in the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the countries. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020214382. We meticulously retrieved 483 potentially eligible literatures by searching electronic databases. Among them, 92 literatures were excluded due to duplicated searches. Subsequently, 349 studies were regarded as absolute irrelevant studies by examining titles and abstracts. A full-text of 42 studies was entirely reviewed; however, 33 records were excluded because they were abstract, conferences, reviews, had no comparison between antithrombic therapy and control groups, or outcomes were not reported. Therefore, a total of 9 full-text studies with 5970 patients were included in the final analysis ( Fig. 1 ) [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] . The sample size of patients ranged from 50 to 3772. Seven studies were mainly from European countries and two studies from America. Among these studies, only two studies were prospective in design, and the rest were retrospective. All studies were published in English. Pooled analysis of adjusted results included studies from Russo et al. [4] and Trembay et al. [6] which used propensity-score matching methods by adjusting factors including age, gender, race, and commodities. The characteristics of the study are shown in Table 1 . The overall quality of included studies was high with NOS scores ≥7. The quality of the included articles is assessed and displayed in Table S1 . The meta-analysis showed that antiplatelet agents were not associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.64 to 1.50, P = 0.94; I 2 = 65%) (Fig. 1A) . Moreover, a significant association between antiplatelet agents and higher risk of mortality were found in patients with COVID-19 (OR = 2.29, 95%CI: 1.35 to 3.89, P = 0.002; I 2 = 57%) (Fig. 1B) . The results were derived from three studies that provided the unadjusted estimates. However, the adjusted results of two studies were pooled which indicated that antiplatelet agents were not associated with an increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.40 to 1.06, P = 0.498; I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 1C) . According to the subgroup analysis based on countries, analysis of studies from European countries indicated that antiplatelet agents were associated with lower risk of severe COVID-19 disease (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.58 to 1.25, P = 0.41; I 2 = 0%). In addition, sensitivity analyses by omitting each study at a time did not significantly alter the overall results. The current systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that while there is no significant benefit on mortality demonstrated with the use of antiplatelet agents, the upper bound of the confidence interval suggests that there is unlikely to be a compelling risk of harm associated with this practice. However, the benefit and risk of the use of antiplatelet agents should be fully considered especially in the presence of thrombocytopenia status in patients with COVID-19. Combined adjusted analysis of two studies using a propensity matching analysis where patients were matched to co-morbidities showed no advantage or disadvantage of using antiplatelet agents. A number of risk factors for severe or dead COVID-19 have been reported, including old age, male, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease [12, 13] . In our pooled analysis of adjusted results of two studies, Russo et al. [4] and Tremblay et al. [6] have adjusted comorbidities such as age, smoke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, obesity, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. While the results of our unadjusted analysis, in which it revealed an association of increased mortality in COVID-19 patients on antiplatelet agents, could be accounted for co-morbidities as patients on antiplatelet agents may already have existing comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or other factors that can lead to increased risk of higher mortality rate not directly associated with the efficacy of antiplatelet agents. Our results should be interpreted with caution. Most of the studies included were retrospective in design and results were based on unadjusted analysis, which could be subject to selection bias and potential confounders. Data on type and dose of antiplatelet agents were lacking in most included studies, hence, cannot be further analyzed. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that antiplatelet agents might protect against the development of severe COVID-19 disease. Randomized controlled trials are highly needed and of paramount importance to investigate whether the use of antiplatelet agents might be beneficial in COVID-19 infection. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.016. Yushu Wang and Xin Qi design this study together. Yushu Wang was working for literature review and data collection. Xin Qi was working for organizing and analyzing data. Guangyu Ao and Yushu Wang were working for article writing and revise. Funding/Acknowledgments none. None of the authors have conflicts of interest to declare. CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells The neutrophil's choice: phagocytose vs make neutrophil extracellular traps Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan Clinical impact of pre-admission antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study 30-day mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first wave of the Italian epidemic: a prospective cohort study Impact of anticoagulation prior to COVID-19 infection: a propensity score-matched cohort study Characterization and clinical course of 1000 patients with COVID-19 in New York: retrospective case series Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 COVID-19 mortality in patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents The characteristics of 50 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without ARDS Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients in a Swiss university hospital: an observational retrospective study Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Cardiac Involvement in COVID-19 Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study