key: cord-0696511-yy8tf9f3 authors: Keusch, Gerald T; Lam, Sai Kit; Mackenzie, John S; Saif, Linda; Turner, Michael title: An appeal for an objective, open, and transparent scientific debate about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 – Authors' reply date: 2021-09-17 journal: Lancet DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02013-4 sha: accce351ace5a4d01456466aacada373e835e711 doc_id: 696511 cord_uid: yy8tf9f3 nan We write on behalf of our coauthors 1 to agree with Jacques van Helden and colleagues that scientists "need to evaluate all hypotheses on a rational basis, and to weigh their likelihood based on facts and evidence, devoid of speculation concerning possible political impacts". Scientific knowledge is essential to effectively guide future efforts to reduce the chance of another pandemic, 1,2 including by mitigating or blocking all relevant pathways for a pathogen to host-shift from natural hosts to humans. Endless arguments back and forth about the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, pitting evolution and spillover in nature against a laboratory leak do little to advance our critical knowledge base. We need more scientific evidence that unravels the likely pathway for the virus because real evidence that confirms or refutes hypotheses is far more important than the hypotheses and conjectures themselves. Expert reviews and new data continue to emerge tracing the evolutionary pathway of SARS-CoV-2 in nature over decades, serving to place some controversial genomic characteristics within a broader evolutionary context. 3 Science, not speculation, is essential to determine how SARS-CoV-2 reached humans Statement on advancing the next series of studies to find the origins of SARS-CoV-2 Identification of novel bat coronaviruses sheds light on the evolutionary origins of SARS-CoV-2 and related viruses Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats created a generalist virus and highly capable human pathogen The origins of SARS-CoV-2: a critical review China sets back search for covid origins with rejection of WHO investigation proposal