key: cord-0696355-y22vke9l
authors: McGrath, Michael; Duncan, Fiona; Dotsikas, Kate; Baskin, Cleo; Crosby, Liam; Gnani, Shamini; Hunter, Rachael Maree; Kaner, Eileen; Kirkbride, James Bowes; Lafortune, Louise; Lee, Caroline; Oliver, Emily; Osborn, David P; Walters, Kate R; Dykxhoorn, Jennifer
title: Effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults experiencing financial uncertainty: a systematic review
date: 2021-04-30
journal: J Epidemiol Community Health
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-215574
sha: 62bdd417480e72fbcfa2f7b1c4b1adf7020b2142
doc_id: 696355
cord_uid: y22vke9l

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a period of global economic uncertainty. Financial strain, personal debt, recent job loss and housing insecurity are important risk factors for the mental health of working-age adults. Community interventions have the potential to attenuate the mental health impact of these stressors. We examined the effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults in high-income countries during periods of financial insecurity. METHODS: Eight electronic databases were systematically screened for experimental and observational studies published since 2000 measuring the effectiveness of community interventions on mental health outcomes. We included any non-clinical intervention that aimed to address the financial, employment, food or housing insecurity of participants. A review protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42019156364) and results are reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: From 2326 studies screened, 15 met our inclusion criteria. Five categories of community intervention were identified: advice services colocated in healthcare settings; link worker social prescribing; telephone debt advice; food insecurity interventions; and active labour market programmes. In general, the evidence for effective and cost-effective community interventions delivered to individuals experiencing financial insecurity was lacking. From the small number of studies without a high risk of bias, there was some evidence that financial insecurity and associated mental health problems were amenable to change and differences by subpopulations were observed. CONCLUSION: There is a need for well-controlled studies and trials to better understand effective ingredients and to identify those interventions warranting wider implementation.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unanticipated period of global financial insecurity. 1 The introduction of measures to contain the virus and protect health systems has resulted in increased unemployment and job insecurity, 2 personal debt, 3 food insecurity 4 and mortgage and rent stress, 3 5 all of which are risk factors for poor mental health. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Financial strain, indebtedness and the inability to provide materially for one's family may increase stress and household conflict, undermine personal autonomy and induce feelings of shame and guilt. [11] [12] [13] Further, the transition out of secure housing and employment can disrupt structures that offer emotional stability, reduce social connectedness and remove the sense of purpose and fulfilment that employment can provide. [11] [12] [13] [14] As a result, periods of financial uncertainty are associated with the incidence of common mental disorders, 15 16 increased symptoms of severe mental illness 17 and suicide and self-harm. 18 These relationships are bidirectional, reflecting both social causation and social drift. 19 Adverse financial events increase the risk of developing mental illness (ie, social causation), 14 20 and poor mental health can exacerbate financial insecurity due to experiences of stigma and discrimination, difficulties finding and maintaining employment and strained family and personal relationships (ie, social drift). 14 21 Further, differentials in exposure and vulnerability across the socioeconomic gradient mean these stressors are concentrated in deprived communities and have the potential to widen inequalities. 22 Longitudinal analysis of poverty dynamics in high-income countries shows that compared with a relatively small number of people experiencing sustained poverty, there is a substantially larger population moving in and out of poverty from 1 year to the next. 23 Importantly, longer episodes of poverty are associated with a reduced likelihood of exiting poverty and a higher risk of re-entering poverty in the future. 24 Therefore, periods of financial adversity represent a crucial juncture for preventing common mental disorders, promoting mental well-being and reducing social inequalities.

Community interventions present one means of attenuating the mental health impact of episodes of Review financial insecurity. 25 These interventions draw on resources and expertise within communities and beyond the healthcare system to provide individuals with non-clinical forms of support to improve their psychosocial circumstances. 26 By acknowledging that individuals are embedded within wider social, economic and political contexts, community interventions operate across all levels of the socioecological model of health promotion (from the individual to the policy level) to prioritise both health and social outcomes. [26] [27] [28] [29] While implementing interventions that act on the social determinants of mental health has been highlighted as a global priority, a substantial implementation gap exists. 30 31 Barriers to wider implementation include limited evidence of effectiveness, the complexity of addressing social and economic challenges, and that action can be seen as inherently political. 32 As the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, there have been renewed calls to pre-empt the mental health impacts of increasing household debt, unemployment and food insecurity by implementing interventions that provide social and financial support. 33 34 Previous reviews have examined the effectiveness of community interventions for improving the mental health of specific subpopulations, such as the long-term unemployed, 35 36 people experiencing homelessness 37 38 and people with pre-existing mental illness. 39 40 However, a stronger evidence base regarding the delivery of these interventions to the general population is required. A review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of interventions aiming to reduce the impact of financial hardship on mental health found limited evidence of effectiveness for most types of interventions. 41 All participants in the studies identified were unemployed, and the authors emphasised the need for further research and evaluation of interventions delivered in both primary care settings and within statutory and voluntary sector organisations. Therefore, we examine community interventions that seek to address acute financial stressors and their consequences (such as recent or imminent job loss, debt and legal issues, and housing and food insecurity) in a broader population and draw on evidence from a wider range of study designs. Specifically, this systematic review aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of community interventions for improving the mental health of working-age adults in high-income countries during periods of financial uncertainty, and (2) evaluate the impact of these interventions on health inequalities.

We conducted a systematic review to identify effective community interventions for improved mental health and highlight priorities for future research. A review protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD 42019156364) and results are reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. 42

An electronic search of eight academic and grey literature databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, the Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, Social Care Online) was conducted in August 2019. The search strategy incorporated a mix of keywords, and subject headings adapted for each database. Based on our study aims, the search strategy was built around three concepts: (1) personal or household financial insecurity, including recent unemployment, precarious employment, personal debt, food and housing insecurity; (2) community interventions; and (3) mental health and well-being outcomes (see online supplemental material). Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles, with discrepancies reconciled through discussion. Only studies reporting primary research and published in English since January 2000 were included. Additional studies were identified by manually searching relevant systematic reviews and study protocols identified during screening and backward-forward citation searching all studies meeting our inclusion criteria.

For inclusion, studies needed to report the effectiveness of a community intervention on mental health outcomes for working-age adults (aged 18-64) in high-income countries, as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 43 experiencing personal or household financial uncertainty (table 1) . We draw on an established definition of community interventions and include non-clinical programmes, services and policies that (1) operate at any level of health promotion (from the individual level to the policy level), (2) draw on resources and expertise found within communities and beyond the healthcare system, and (3) address both health and social outcomes. 26 28 We included interventions adopting universal or selective prevention strategies, which attempt to attenuate the impact of financial insecurity on mental health and well-being in the general population, rather than in people with existing mental health problems. 44 Interventions were included if they addressed acute episodes of financial insecurity and their consequences, such as programmes for the recently unemployed (defined as a period of Working-age adults (18-64 years) living in high-income, OECD countries experiencing periods of personal or household financial uncertainty relating to employment (eg, recent or imminent unemployment, precarious employment), personal debt and legal issues, housing security (eg, mortgage or rent stress, threatened eviction) or food insecurity.

Other chronic stressors or populations with more complex needs (eg, long-term homelessness, refugees and asylum seekers, recently released offenders, people experiencing domestic violence).

Community or social interventions. Defined as any non-clinical programme, service or policy that draws on resources beyond the healthcare system to improve the psychosocial living conditions of participants or their community.

Clinical or pharmaceutical interventions, including psychotherapies.

Experimental or quantitative observational studies that employ either preintervention and postintervention measurements, or intervention and control arms.

Studies without preintervention and postintervention measurements or a comparison group, formative and process evaluations, qualitative studies.

Primary outcomes Mental health outcomes broadly defined to include any objective measure of: ► Psychological distress (eg, worry, stress, shame). ► The symptoms of common mental disorders (eg, anxiety, depression). ► Well-being and positive affect (eg, quality of life, happiness, selfesteem, resilience). ► Mental health service utilisation (eg, consultations, referrals, prescribing).

Any data relevant to the cost-effectiveness of the intervention (from an individual, societal or government perspective).

OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

less than 12 months) or those at risk of homelessness, the provision of legal or debt advice, or services for the food insecure, rather than those addressing persistent problems such as longterm unemployment or homelessness. The primary outcome, mental health and well-being, was broadly defined to include psychological distress, the symptoms of common mental disorders, aspects of well-being and positive affect, and mental health service utilisation. In order to measure effectiveness, only quantitative studies employing experimental, quasiexperimental or observational designs (with either a nonexposed comparison group or before-after intervention measurement) were included. Data relevant to an economic evaluation were extracted as secondary outcomes.

A data extraction framework was adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist 45 and included the following elements: study location, participant characteristics, intervention description, financial stressor targeted, procedure and activities, mode/location of delivery, duration, frequency/intensity of intervention, study design, sample size, follow-up period and primary and secondary outcomes.

Two reviewers independently assessed individual study quality and risk of bias using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. 46 Mental health outcomes of each study were assessed on a three-point scale and against eight domains: selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, withdrawals, intervention integrity and analysis. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion, and each study was given an overall quality rating of 'high', 'moderate' or 'low', following instrument scoring guidelines. Studies were not excluded based on their quality assessment.

2326 non-duplicate titles identified were identified, 2304 from database searches and 22 from manual searches. Of these, 15 studies met our inclusion criteria (figure 1). Ten studies (67%) were identified from the UK, two (13%) from the USA and one study each (7%) from Finland, Germany and Canada. Four studies used experimental research designs (three RCTs 47-49 and one quasiexperimental controlled study 50 ) and the remaining 11 employed either controlled or uncontrolled before-after methods. Based on our quality assessment, three studies were rated 'moderate' quality 47 48 50 and the remaining 12 studies 'low' quality.

Most studies (n=12) measured mental health outcomes using standardised screening instruments for the symptoms of anxiety and depression, stress, psychological distress, well-being and functioning (table 2) . Four studies reported mental health service utilisation, including primary care consultations, referrals, and antidepressant, hypnotic and anxiolytic prescribing. 47 50-52 

Following data extraction, the included studies were categorised by the two reviewers into five intervention types: welfare and advice services colocated in healthcare settings (n=7), 50 52-57 link worker social prescribing (n=2), 47 51 telephone debt advice (n=2), 48 58 active labour market programmes for the recently unemployed (n=3) 49 59 60 and food insecurity interventions (n=1) 61 (table 3) .

Seven studies measured the effectiveness of colocated welfare and advice services on mental health outcomes. A quasiexperimental controlled study in London rated of moderate quality reduced self-reported financial strain among participants at 3-month follow-up, compared with controls. 50 Overall, participants showed no changes in well-being, the symptoms of common mental disorders or self-reported general practice (GP) consultations. However, well-being scores did improve for those participants for whom advice resulted in positive financial outcomes, while symptoms of common mental disorders declined for women and Black participants. 

A further six uncontrolled before-after studies, which were assessed to be of low quality, showed inconsistent results. [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] Reduced stress and increased well-being were observed among low-income earning, legal advice recipients in a family practice in Arizona, USA. 55 Three studies in England reported improvements in some, but not all, 36-item Short Form Survey domains for welfare and financial advice recipients. 53 54 57 However, there was little evidence these improvements were sustained in the Randomised controlled trial (5-month follow-up) STAI-S, EQ-5D

Roncarolo et al (2016) 61 Food insecure individuals (n=824, 58% female, 36% foreign born) recruited from 24 non-profit organisations in Montreal, Canada.

Controlled before-after study (9-month followup)

Active labour market programmes 

Welfare and advice services colocated in healthcare settings (n=7) 50 52-57 Services operating in primary care and hospital settings that provide information, support and advocacy for people dealing with financial insecurity. These services assist participants with problems relating to welfare (eg, benefits entitlement and appeals), housing (eg, tenancy agreements, repossessions and eviction), employment problems (eg, redundancy, unfair dismissal and training), finances (eg, income maximisation and financial literacy) and legal issues (eg, debt, compensation and court action).

Link worker social prescribing (n=2) 47 51 Trained link workers refer patients who present to their general practitioner with psychosocial problems to voluntary and community sector services, including cultural activities, befriending services and physical activity groups.

Telephone debt advice services (n=2) 48 58 Advice delivered via telephone providing financial planning and budgeting, credit counselling, assistance with repossession and bailiffs, and referral services, in conjunction with self-help material delivered online or by post.

Active labour market programmes (n=3) 49 59 60 Programmes delivered as part of national labour policies for the recently unemployed. These policies differ by country but involve early intervention when people become unemployed and regular monitoring of activities based on principles of 'mutual obligation'. Unemployed people may be required to undertake job-seeking activities, participate in vocational and life skills training, complete work placements or volunteer their time in order to receive welfare benefits and avoid sanctions. 83 Food insecurity interventions (n=1) 61 Programmes that aim to alleviate food insecurity, including food banks, collective kitchens and bulk-buying clubs.

Review longer term. Another advice outreach service in deprived areas of England reported reductions in GP appointments and prescriptions for hypnotics and anxiolytics but found no evidence of a change in antidepressant prescribing. 52

Two studies from the UK measured the effectiveness of link workers providing referral from primary care to voluntary and community sector organisations. Both studies focused on the mechanism of referral rather than the specific social prescription that patients received. An RCT in England used trained project facilitators to encourage participation in programmes managed by local and national voluntary organisations. 47 The study failed to report all quality assessment domains adequately and received a moderate quality assessment. Compared with controls, at 4-month follow-up, participants in the intervention arm showed greater improvements in anxiety and functional health status. No difference was observed in depression or perceived social support. These patients also received more mental health prescriptions and fewer mental health referrals than controls. In an uncontrolled before-after study in London rated low quality, link workers directed, and if necessary, accompanied GP-referred patients to community programmes. 51 At 3-month follow-up participants showed reductions in psychological distress, primary care consultations or mental health prescriptions.

Two studies describing telephone debt advice services were identified, and both received a low-quality rating. 48 62 An RCT in England and Wales recruited individuals experiencing debtrelated stress from unemployment centres. 48 Participants in the intervention arm received telephone advice, which included assistance with repossession and bailiffs, financial planning, written self-help material and a referral service. The trial encountered difficulties recruiting participants and delivering telephone advice and, because of higher than anticipated attrition, stopped before completing 12-month follow-up. However, at 20 weeks, there was no evidence of improved anxiety or general health scores. A not-for-profit debt management programme in the USA provided telephone credit counselling and online material. 58 In a before-after evaluation of the programme, at 18-month follow-up participants reported small improvements in a composite health score, which included self-reported stress.

A non-randomised study of food insecure, low-income households in Canada was rated low quality and compared traditional food banks to 'alternative' food insecurity interventions (collective kitchens, bulk-buying clubs and community gardens), which aim to promote empowerment, social inclusion and skill development. 61 Improvements in food security and mental health were observed in food bank users at 9-month follow-up, but not for participants of alternative interventions.

Three studies examined mental health outcomes following participation in active labour market programmes. 49 59 60 An RCT in the USA assigned recently unemployed people into either week-long, job search workshops or a control group receiving an advice booklet. 49 The intervention comprised daily 4-hour group sessions, which aimed to increase participants' sense of mastery and motivation by teaching job search skills and protecting against setbacks. At 2-year follow-up, participants in the intervention arm had lower depression scores, higher levels of role and emotional functioning, and were less likely to have experienced a major depressive episode in the previous year. The study received a moderate rating as not all quality assessment domains were reported. Another two programmes for the recently unemployed were identified and received low-quality assessments. In Germany, participants in labour schemes who received wage and selfemployment subsidies or undertook training courses showed increased life satisfaction at 12-month follow-up, compared with baseline (measured within 2 weeks of becoming unemployed). 59 At the conclusion of vocational training programmes in Finland, no improvements were observed in participants' psychological distress, stress symptom scores or sense of coherence, compared with baseline. 60 Nevertheless, subgroup analyses revealed improvements in these outcomes for people with a tertiary education, those studying courses in 'white-collar' occupations, but not for those studying 'blue-collar' occupations.

A full economic evaluation was not conducted in any of the studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Nevertheless, five studies measured the impact of services on healthcare staffing, appointments and prescribing, 47 50-52 57 three studies calculated financial returns to participants 50 56 57 and one study reported the cost of delivering the service 47 (table 4) .

Interviews with healthcare workers revealed a perception that colocated welfare and advice services reduced staff workloads 57 and the number of GP appointments, mental health referrals and prescriptions. 52 However, changes to the frequency of GP consultations were not confirmed using either retrospective analysis of medical records 52 or patient self-report. 50 Colocated welfare advice services produced substantial financial gains for participants due to increased welfare payments and reduced debt. 50 56 57 A return on investment analysis of one service showed a total financial gain to participants of £15 for every £1 spent by the service provider after 8 months. 50 A link worker service found that participants received more mental health prescriptions and fewer mental health referrals. 47 However, the intervention arm accrued a higher mean cost per participant compared with controls after the cost of delivering the service was taken into account.

This review identified five categories of community interventions for working-age adults during periods of financial adversity. None of the included studies received a high-quality assessment and we find insufficient evidence to conclude that any one of these diverse categories of interventions is effective for improving mental health and well-being. Further, none of the studies identified conducted a full economic evaluation and there is limited evidence of an impact on costs to the health system.

Three studies without a high risk of bias showed some evidence of effectiveness. 47 49 50 Participation in group job skills training reduced the symptoms of depression and enhanced emotional functioning, 49 which aligns with the wider literature confirming the effectiveness of similar job search programmes on the mental health of the long-term unemployed. 63 64 There was some evidence that the provision of legal and welfare advice in primary care 50 and referral to community sector programmes 47 improved outcomes, at least for some subpopulations. The remaining studies received low-quality assessment ratings, Review primarily due to self-selected samples, 53 55 57 58 uncontrolled designs 51-57 60 and poor study retention. 48 53 54 58 61 Four studies used primary care and mental health service utilisation as outcome measures. 47 50-52 However, it is unclear whether these outcomes indicated improved access to services or quality of care, or declining mental health.

This overall lack of evidence mirrors the findings of reviews examining the effect on health and social outcomes of colocated advice services 65 and social prescribing, 66 and interventions to reduce the impact of poverty and inequality, 67 and unemployment and economic hardship. 41 Studies identified in our review described the challenges of conducting trials in populations experiencing financial uncertainty 48 and within primary care and voluntary sector settings 47 highlighting the difficulties of measuring the impact of community interventions using traditional effectiveness studies. 67 68 The studies we identified provide useful insights for intervening on health inequalities, which is particularly important in light of emerging evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing patterns of inequalities. [69] [70] [71] Since the introduction of measures to contain the pandemic, those living in deprived communities and low-income households have been more likely to experience both financial adversity (employment sector shutdowns, reduced income and job losses) 69 70 and declining mental health. 71 Most interventions we identified aimed to reach deprived communities, either through targeted delivery in deprived neighbourhoods 50 52 53 56 or through eligibility based on income or employment status. 48 49 55 59 60 As might be expected, there was some evidence that mental health outcomes improved only for those participants who saw improvements in their financial circumstances. 49 50 53 54 61 This indicates that the social determinants of health are amenable 56 Low For those participants who complete preintervention and postintervention questionnaires (n=81), no change in SF-12 score (pre: mean=34.1, post: mean=35.6, p=0.335). Over the 12-month period, £356 754 gained on behalf of clients.

Abbott et al (2006) 54 Low At 6-month follow-up, no improvements in SF-36 domains (vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health) among those who saw an increase in income following participation (n=160) compared with those who did not (n=84). At 12-month follow-up, improvements observed in emotional role (adjusted mean difference: 16.37 (2.72-30.01), p=0.02) and mental health (adjusted mean difference: 6.85 (0.72-12.98), p=0.03) for participants with increased income (n=134), compared with those who did not (n=50). No change in vitality and social functioning scores between the two groups.

Harris (2013) 48 Low Trial stopped early due to attrition. However, after 20 weeks, no changes were observed in anxiety or general health score for either the intervention group (n=119) or the control group (n=115). 

Rose (2019) 59 Low Labour programmes that most closely replicate employment (wage subsidies and subsidised self-employment) had the largest effect on improving the wellbeing of participants. When results were disaggregated by sex, no differences in well-being were observed participating in the ALMP schemes, compared with non-participants.

Saloniemi et al (2014) 60 Low Overall, no change in psychological distress, sense of coherence or stress at the end of the training course, compared with baseline. However, improvements in all three measures were seen among participants with a tertiary education and those who were previously employed in a 'white-collar' occupation. 

to change through focused community interventions and that reducing financial uncertainty could be an actionable pathway towards improved mental health. Colocated welfare and advice services produced substantial financial gains for participants. 50 56 57 This underscores the capacity for these programmes to correct the historical underclaiming of welfare entitlements observed in many deprived communities, 65 which has been highlighted as a persistent problem during the implementation of COVID-19 employment protection policies. 72 Nevertheless, evidence from vocational training programmes showing psychological distress reduced only among participants previously employed in salaried professions or with a tertiary education warns of the potential for community interventions to widen health inequalities. 60 There is some evidence that integrating community services into healthcare settings can improve mental health, 47 50 which is important within a policy context that increasingly emphasises third sector organisations' role in providing care. 73 Nevertheless, all 13 studies that adequately reported sample characteristics recruited more female participants than males (range 52%-75%). As more than half of our studies recruited participants from GPs, this may in part reflect lower primary care consultation rates observed in men. 74 75 Therefore, variation in service utilisation and quality of care by gender, age, economic deprivation and language and ethnicity [76] [77] [78] should be considered when implementing programmes in these settings.

A focus on universal and selective prevention during the acute stages of financial adversity means we have systematically excluded studies evaluating community interventions on specific subpopulations with recognised pre-existing challenges, such as the long-term unemployed and homeless, and people with severe mental illness. Similarly, we excluded a wider body of literature examining the effectiveness of interventions that seek to address chronic financial hardship and neighbourhood-level poverty. 79 80 In general, the interventions we identified were not mental health interventions. Instead, their primary aim was to improve the material circumstances of participants. Therefore, we will have excluded studies evaluating the impact of these, and other promising interventions, on non-mental health outcomes, particularly those operating outside of healthcare settings where mental health outcomes are not routinely collected. We included only studies published since 2000 in order to identify evidence most relevant to contemporary service configuration and contexts; however, this may have introduced some bias. Reviewing studies from across high-income countries with divergent welfare provision models means the effect of an intervention observed in one country is unlikely to be generalisable to another. 81 Finally, excluding qualitative research and process evaluations further limits our findings. For many studies, limited information could be extracted regarding the intervention setting, the procedures and resources involved and any underpinning theory of change. A better understanding of the mechanisms through which these interventions act and the pathways towards improved mental health is required. 82

The evidence base for community interventions delivered to individuals experiencing personal or household financial adversity was marked by the presence of small, uncontrolled studies drawn from self-selected samples. However, our review highlights that community interventions can successfully reduce financial uncertainty, which is increasingly important given the deteriorating economic situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

What is already known on this subject ► Episodes of financial adversity, such as recent job loss, precarious employment, personal debt and housing and food insecurity, represent a crucial period for the protection and promotion of mental health in working-age adults. ► Community interventions are one means through which to address these social determinants of mental health. ► A stronger evidence base regarding the effectiveness of community interventions delivered to the general population during periods of financial insecurity is required.

► The evidence base for effective and cost-effective community interventions is marked by the presence of small, uncontrolled studies including potentially non-representative samples. ► Nevertheless, job search programmes, welfare and advice services located in healthcare settings, and link worker referral services show some evidence of effectiveness, at least for some subpopulations. ► The social determinants of health are amenable to change through focused community interventions and mitigating the impact of financial adversities could be an actionable pathway towards improved mental health.

Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future

OECD employment outlook

Early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household finances in Quebec

Vulnerability to food insecurity since the COVID-19 lockdown. London: King's College London & The Food Foundation

COVID-19 and mortgage and rental payments

Precarious employment and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Perceived job insecurity, unemployment and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

The relationship between personal unsecured debt and mental and physical health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Food insecurity and mental health among females in high-income countries

Home foreclosure, health, and mental health: a systematic review of individual, aggregate, and contextual associations

The relationship between personal debt and mental health: a systematic review

Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study

Food insecurity and mental health status: a global analysis of 149 countries

Mental health affects future employment as job loss affects mental health: findings from a longitudinal population study

Socioeconomic circumstances and common mental disorders among Finnish and British public sector employees: evidence from the Helsinki health study and the Whitehall II study

The relationship between personal debt and specific common mental disorders

The public mental health significance of research on socio-economic factors in schizophrenia and major depression

Personal debt and suicidal ideation

Poverty and mental health: a review of practice and policies

Interventions to address household food insecurity in high-income countries

Global mental health: principles and practice

Equity, social determinants and public health programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization

Poverty persistence in Britain: a multivariate analysis using the BHPS, 1991-1997: ISER working paper series

Poverty dynamics in six OECD countries

World Health Organization. Social determinants of mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization

Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity

Community-based interventions

Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations

Social interventions: an effective approach to reduce adult depression?

Social interventions: a new era for global mental health?

Public mental health: key challenges and opportunities

Social interventions in mental health: a call to action

Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic

Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

Vocational interventions for unemployed: effects on work participation and mental distress; a systematic review. database of Abstracts of reviews of effects (Dare): quality-assessed reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination

Mental health promoting interventions for the unemployed: a systematic review of applied techniques and effectiveness

Effects of housing first approaches on health and well-being of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Interventions to improve the health of the homeless: a systematic review

A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems

A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness

Interventions to reduce the impact of unemployment and economic hardship on mental health in the general population: a systematic review

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Country classification

World Health Organization. Prevention of Mental Disorders -Effective Interventions and Policy Options

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies

A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector

Changing fortunes: results from a randomized trial of the offer of debt advice in England and Wales

Two years after a job loss: long-term impact of the jobs program on reemployment and mental health

Impact of co-located welfare advice in healthcare settings: prospective quasi-experimental controlled study

Facilitating access to voluntary and community services for patients with psychosocial problems: a before-after evaluation

Evaluation of welfare advice in primary care: effect on practice workload and prescribing for mental health

Welfare benefits advice in primary care: evidence of improvements in health

What is the impact on individual health of services in general practice settings which offer welfare benefits advice?

Pilot study of impact of medical-legal partnership services on patients' perceived stress and wellbeing

Evaluation of the Warrington district cab GP outreach project

Delivering welfare rights advice in the acute hospital setting. London: Health Protection Agency

Relationships among credit counseling clients' financial well being, financial behaviors, financial stressor events, and health

The impact of active labour market policies on the well-being of the unemployed

Training for the unemployed: differential effects in white-and blue-collar workers with respect to mental well-being

Short-Term effects of traditional and alternative community interventions to address food insecurity

Is an insecure job better for health than having no job at all? A systematic review of studies investigating the health-related risks of both job insecurity and unemployment

The impact of active labour market policies on health outcomes: a scoping review

The health and wellbeing effects of active labor market programs. Wellbeing

A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in healthcare settings

Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence

Interventions to mitigate the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health

Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?

COVID-19 and Inequalities*

Are we all in this together? longitudinal assessment of cumulative adversities by socioeconomic position in the first 3 weeks of lockdown in the UK

Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts

Why inequality could spread COVID-19

Social prescribing

Do men consult less than women? an analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data

Why do men go to the doctor? sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with healthcare utilisation among a cohort of Australian men

Variations in GP-patient communication by ethnicity, age, and gender: evidence from a national primary care patient survey

Factors associated with consultation rates in general practice in England, 2013-2014: a cross-sectional study

Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care

Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: evidence from moving to opportunity

The health impact of policy interventions tackling the social determinants of common mental disorder: a systematic review

Welfare state regimes, unemployment and health: a comparative study of the relationship between unemployment and self-reported health in 23 European countries

Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways

The effectiveness of European active labor market policy