key: cord-0694935-92f2xg0y authors: Arnot, Megan; Brandl, Eva; Campbell, O L K; Chen, Yuan; Du, Juan; Dyble, Mark; Emmott, Emily H; Ge, Erhao; Kretschmer, Luke D W; Mace, Ruth; Micheletti, Alberto J C; Nila, Sarah; Peacey, Sarah; Salali, Gul Deniz; Zhang, Hanzhi title: How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic date: 2020-10-24 journal: Evol Med Public Health DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoaa038 sha: 18f26fc0a60d7c768195e41344b75eb00c0549b9 doc_id: 694935 cord_uid: 92f2xg0y The COVID-19 pandemic has brought science into the public eye and to the attention of governments more than ever before. Much of this attention is on work in epidemiology, virology, and public health, with most behavioural advice in public health focussing squarely on ‘proximate’ determinants of behaviour. While epidemiological models are powerful tools to predict the spread of disease when human behaviour is stable, most do not incorporate behavioural change. The evolutionary basis of our preferences and the cultural evolutionary dynamics of our beliefs drive behavioural change, so understanding these evolutionary processes can help inform individual and government decision-making in the face of a pandemic. In theory, stopping the spread of viruses is simple: limit contact with other people and prevent transmission (1) . In practice, this is hard. While many individuals promptly respond to social distancing measures, others are resistant to change, and even do things that make matters worse. Scientists may advise governments to enforce behaviour in the absence of voluntary cooperation, for example through policing 'lockdowns,' as has happened in much of the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such policy decisions have potentially profound consequences for our survival, and also for our social and economic well-being. Therefore, we would benefit from using all the tools at our disposal to help governments and individuals to make decisions successfully. Understanding the fundamental principles underlying behaviour change may seem a bit of luxury in the maelstrom of a pandemic that has killed over a million people across the globe. Tried and tested public health policies learned through hard experience of managing other epidemics are certainly a priority in the early stages of any pandemic. Public health bodies try to inform the public of health risks, in the hope that will cause individuals to change their behaviour for their own good, and especially for the public good. However, evolutionary frameworks do provide some guiding principles behind human decision-making, which is absent from most of the models used to inform public health policy (2) . The focus in behavioural ecology is on how living things have evolved to respond in different ecological conditions (3) . There is a long tradition in behavioural ecology of examining how behaviour (of humans and other species) varies in response to demography, ecology and access to resources from an evolutionary perspective, which has relevance to understanding how we behave in a pandemic, so may help improve behavioural interventions. Everybody will change their behaviour in different ways according to their circumstances, but many of those differences are predictable in an evolutionary framework. In evolutionary models of human behaviour, the currency determining the costs and benefits of behaviour is inclusive fitness. The reasons why evolution might favour such behaviours are often called the 'ultimate' explanation for behaviours (4) . The minutiae of decision-making cannot always be mapped directly onto fitness consequences, so currencies that may approximate to reproductive success are often used instead, both by behavioural ecologists modelling behaviour and presumably also by human brains when deciding how to behave. Evolutionary life history theory (Box 1) uses a cost-benefit scenario that makes explicit that the optimal behavioural responses of individuals depend on a range of contingencies; the most fundamental of these include age, sex, mortality risk in the environment and constraints. Optimal decisions in terms of maximising fitness involve trade-offs (see Box 1) . For example, as an individual living through a pandemic, we may have to decide whether to go out to work and risk infection in order to earn money for immediate and future needs, or to stay at home and avoid infection. Evolutionary models can theoretically unite different currencies, such as infection risk and economic benefit, through their impact on the common currency of reproductive success (5) , or some proxy such as long-term survival. Such models highlight the need to take into account how avoiding disease increases chances of starvation or loss of livelihood, and how these jointly influence survival and reproductive success. Avoiding disease by social distancing reduces the likelihood of meeting a reproductive partner, and any associated loss of income/employment may hinder the opportunity to reproduce or invest in the well-being of your children or grandchildren-with these "costs" potentially persisting into the future. Younger individuals of reproductive age therefore face different trade-offs from older individuals of post-reproductive age even before considering agespecific differences in mortality risk observed due to COVID-19 (6) . Infection risk is not the only consideration in optimal decision-making, and may not even be very significant in evolutionary terms. When governments make policy decisions, the trade-offs are usually evaluated at the population level. Such decisions -like many of the most challenging global problems -are social dilemmas: there is a collective benefit from widespread cooperation across the population which the government wishes to foster, but individuals have an incentive to maximize their own personal welfare and "free ride" on the cooperation of others. Whilst basic evolutionary and economic models of behaviour assume that self-interest is motivating for individuals, evolutionary models also reveal why individuals may opt to cooperate in line with the public good. There are plenty of theories as to why self-interest is also compatible with behaving cooperatively. Cooperation is most likely to evolve when it is based on kinship, reciprocity, or reputational concerns (known as indirect reciprocity) (see Box 2) . These factors can only favour the evolution of cooperation in small or at best medium-sized groups (7) ; it is difficult to keep track of defectors in larger groups, which may have implications for how governments design and implement policy based on voluntary cooperation. Behavioural ecologists generally assume that in most cases our psychology is somehow equipped to evaluate inclusive fitness trade-offs through cues from our environment; our psychological preferences therefore guide us to behave in a broadly adaptive way. However, the assumption that fitness is maximised by our behaviour does not always hold. Evolution takes time to work, and full knowledge of what is happening may not be available. This is especially relevant when facing a new disease in a rapidly change environment. Cultural transmission, which is an important evolutionary mechanism behind establishing our norms of behaviour, may not be as fast at spreading fitness-maximising behaviour as the spread of the virus. It can also lead to the spread of behaviours that do not maximise inclusive fitness (8) , nor benefit an individual in any wider sense (see Box 3). Nor will it necessarily lead to behaviour that benefits the wider group; although some argue cultural transmission is better placed to generate the establishment of group-beneficial norms than is natural selection on genes (9) . A central insight from evolutionary theory is that our psychological preferences and behaviours evolved not to maximise our health, or the health of our group, but our inclusive fitness. Such insights can help us better understand why individual-and group-level behaviours may conflict with policies designed to mitigate the health and social impact of COVID-19. Here, we examine the underlying 'ultimate' causes of behaviour and decision-making and argue that it can help develop more effective strategies for tackling problems such as: compliance with health-promoting rules and social distancing, domestic violence, preventing the spread of misinformation, and engendering cooperation within and between groups. While the topics covered below are by no means comprehensive, they provide examples of how an evolutionary approach can be used to understand the global challenges experienced during a pandemic. Long-term compliance with health guidelines, as required to contain COVID-19, requires rules that fit with our evolved preferences as much as is possible. Public health guidelines and advice is often predicated on the notion that knowledge of risk will improve compliance. Knowledge can be helpful, but lack of knowledge may not necessarily be the constraint on compliance. Individuals have different priorities based on their own circumstances and ecology, and behavioural change in response to exposure and knowledge of risk itself has its own complicated relationship with behavioural outcomes related to compliance (10) . To understand people's response to competing risks, a life history framework is useful (Box 1). A central tenet of life history theory is that high mortality risk is associated with a preference for earlier and faster reproduction and a more 'live fast die young' strategy (11) (12) (13) (14) . While the preference for reproduction over health is not necessarily verbalised, such phenomenon has been observed in young African men who were less likely to respond to advice on wearing condoms if they were of a lower socioeconomic position, despite being the most at risk of HIV, because they were subject to a greater risk of mortality than wealthier individuals (15) . From a life history perspective, the reproductive benefits of unprotected sex (attracting partners, fathering offspring) outweighed the marginal benefits of reducing one of many mortality risks; lack of knowledge of HIV was not their reason for avoiding condom use (15) . Similarly, sex education does not necessarily reduce pregnancy rates among those teenagers with few opportunities to gain from continuing their education: they evaluate the costs of delaying reproduction as greater than the cost of leaving school (16). As male reproductive success is far more variable than female reproductive success, risk taking is generally considered to be more adaptive in males. This may underpin a greater prevalence in males of healthharming behaviours ranging from criminality (17) to a reluctance to wear face-masks if they are perceived as 'not cool' (18) . A fast life history strategy has been linked to poorer health outcomes (such as obesity (19) ) and a lower socioeconomic position (20) , meaning the individuals for whom the health risk is highest might be those least likely to respond to public health measures. Government lockdowns affect people of a lower socioeconomic position in a disproportionate way through creating greater economic insecurity (21) , running the risk that an uncertain environment makes some people more likely to engage in risky behaviour and disobey government rules ( Figure 1 ). It is possible that the government and media strategies of constantly drawing attention to mortality resulting from the pandemic could have perverse effects through enhancing risk-taking, as the salience of mortality has been shown to cause people to prioritise speeding up reproduction, as recently observed in Indonesia in response to COVID-19 (22) . Alternatively, those with longer time horizons may perceive the risk of COVID-19 as short-term and thus delay child-bearing until it is over, as recently predicted in the USA (23). As our evolved instincts are often selfish or family oriented (Box 2), compliance with measures that benefit the public at some cost to ourselves rely on institutions enforcing punishment. Punishment could be enforced by the passage of laws or, more effectively just by reputational costs (24). In the UK, whilst rules require individuals in certain categories that may be ill with or recently exposed to COVID-19 to quarantine for up to 14 days, any legal enforcement was extremely unlikely over the summer of 2020. A study found that, whilst the theoretical intention to quarantine if contacted by contact tracers was high (around 65%), less than 18% self-reported that they complied (25). Non-adherence was associated with men, younger age groups, having a dependent child in the household, lower socio-economic status, greater hardship during the pandemic, and working in a key sector. support is necessary for successful reproduction and childrearing. Alloparental investments have been associated with better child outcomes (37) and, in most populations, formal education via "institutional alloparenting" is a key determinant of long-term wellbeing (38) . The disruption to learning as a result of a pandemic was observed during SARS, in which children experienced delayed developmental milestones such as counting and saying a complete sentence (39) . Constraining our social support networks by social distancing means that practical support will no longer be transferred between households. For parents, caring for children who would otherwise be at school or cared for by others can lead to increased stress, loss of income (40) and, potentially delayed or reduced fertility (23) . This may have a profound effect for our most vulnerable children. Humans are one of the few primate species known to withdraw parental investment and, in extreme cases, commit infanticide where there is a lack of resources and alloparental support (41). With social distancing severing support networks, some children may be put at increased risk of child neglect and abuse. School closures and holidays are associated with an increased incidence of child maltreatment (42) ; and, in the UK, during the first month of lockdown there was a 1493% rise in the incidence of suspected abusive head trauma in infants (43) . Even without abuse, social distancing measures are likely to have a negative impact on children's development. Evidence from non-pandemic circumstances shows that a long period of school absence is likely to lead to substantially reduced educational outcomes for children (44, 45) . long period of isolation from peers is likely to be detrimental for socio-emotional development (46, 47 Social distancing rules therefore pose dilemmas for families, as it is unclear whether the benefits of social distancing and avoiding the virus outweighs the immediate and long-term costs (e.g. potential fitness costs of higher mortality risk for infants or grandparents, lower mating opportunities for young adults, etc.). The magnitude of these costs may be missed by policy makers who, in Western contexts at least, typically view intensive parenting as the "normal" form of childrearing and significantly underestimate the costs of severing a parent's social ties. Lockdown measures mean most people spend more time with their household than ever before, and under some circumstances, this is having harmful consequences. Domestic violence and femicide have increased during lockdown, which is generally attributed to the close confinement of victims and perpetrators and the removal of victims' support systems, which both facilitate the violence (58) . An evolutionary approach suggests that a tendency to control a mate has a strategic function in a way that is distinct from a conventional analysis that views domestic violence as deviant behaviour in order to assert dominance (59) . If the tendency to resort to violence to control access to a mate has an evolved function, then it should have increased reproductive success in ancestral environments, through either securing more mates or more mating (60) . Intimate partner violence is indeed associated with higher marital fertility in a forager-horticulturalist population (61), where men may use wife abuse both as a means of increasing family size, and also as a means of pursuing their own extra-marital affairs (62) . Domestic abuse may also be coercive behaviour used to ensure continued access to a sexual partner. Indeed, survey data collected by Safe Lives (63) during the pandemic shows that while a large proportion of abusers are current partners (~20%), a greater proportion (~63%) are ex-partners. Under lockdown, we could be witnessing increased attempts by ex-partners to regain control and coerce women into re-entering into a partnership with them. Safe Lives (63) argues that the uncertainty of the current period may cause victims to return to their perpetrators, and abusers may recognise this and use it to their advantage. Risk of domestic violence does decline as women age, with younger women being more likely to be a victim due to their higher fecundity and mate value (i.e. increasing the fitness benefit of coercion for the abuser) (64) . This pattern was seen following Hurricane Katrina, where it was observed that younger women were more likely to experience an increase in violence (65) . Furthermore, financial insecurity is associated with unstable partnerships (66) ; the loss of jobs caused by pandemic mitigation strategies may increase women's incentives to separate. This may motivate some males to retain partners through coercion, while at the same time lockdowns can inhibit female escape strategies and reduce their bargaining power, thus increasing instances of domestic violence. There is an understanding that the rise in abuse is not new perpetrators but previous abusers whose violence has increased (67) . Given the financial instability of the post-COVID world, new abusers may have emerged or will emerge, and data should be collected to elucidate this. We cannot assume that this rise in domestic violence will decrease as lockdowns end and women's refuge services resume, as previous research into abuse following natural disasters has shown that increased demands for services persists for up to a year following the incident (68) . We suggest that policy should focus on demographic groups that an evolutionary approach would highlight as being at a heightened risk of abuse, such as younger women and women whose partners are under economic stress or risk of job loss. Additionally, policies that reduce the bargaining power of women should be highlighted as facilitating domestic violence. For example, in the UK, the aggregation of child benefits, which had previously gone to the mother, into universal credit which is allocated to the head of the household (usually the man) removes a crucial lifeline to victims of domestic violence, making them further reliant on their abusers (69) . Using evolutionary theory to understand under what circumstances abuse might be expected may allow policy makers to target certain individuals and anticipate when during the pandemic violence may increase. Our behaviour is determined partly by our ecology, and also partly determined by culture i.e. local conventions, institutions, and symbolic practices that exist upon a common recognition and acceptance by all group members. Culture also evolves over time (Box 3). How people respond to government guidelines may be influenced strongly by the people they are surrounded by and the culture they are a part of (10). In WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) societies (70), there is a rising scepticism and resistance against contact-tracing measures, which results from perceiving privacy as a moral imperative, safeguarding ideals of political freedom and moral autonomy (71) . A strong belief in individual rights to privacy hampers the introduction of surveillance and contact-tracing infrastructures as these measures are politically costly (72). The strength of this belief is culturally contingent (73) ; in some East Asian countries mass surveillance has been the norm for some time. This means that there is greater acceptance of various contact tracing technologies, and the existing tracking infrastructure has given a head start to the epidemic response (74) . Increased acceptance of contract-tracing in East Asian countries may also stem from experience with recent lethal epidemic outbreaks such as SARS and MERS (75) . Some argue that culturally specific attitudes towards individual versus collective welfare stem from historical differences in farming practices (76) . Experiments show people from WEIRD populations are more likely to adopt more asocial, individualistic learning strategies than other populations (77, 78) . Many attributed national differences in epidemic response to cultural differences of the collectivist attitude, that is, the tendency to sacrifice personal interests for collective gains, in contrast to "individualism", which prioritises individual autonomy (79) . Some attempted to draw a causal link between collectivism and historical exposure to pathogen stress experienced by the group (78), but this correlation does not hold after differences in government effectiveness is taken into consideration (80) . The reality is likely more complex. Immediate concerns for material insecurity, historical contingencies, such as the spread of Protestant values of self-reliance and individualism (81), and reputational concerns are all likely to shape the level of collectivism in different cultural groups (80) . One way to tackle non-compliance to contact tracing is to obtain a consensus from the public that we are now in a different social context from pre-pandemic times, so a new moral norm (i.e. more Vaccination decisions are also shaped by omission bias -when people are faced with a choice between taking a specific action or doing nothing, they often prefer to do nothing if taking action introduces costs or risks that would not have impacted them otherwise (98) . Even when the risk of catching a disease is higher than that of vaccine side-effects, people prefer not to vaccinate (98) (99) (100) . Similarly, our sense of disgust may play a role in vaccine hesitancy (100) , which is associated with aversion to blood and needles (101) and concern for bodily purity (102, 103) . This is evident in the misconception that vaccines contain harmful 'toxins' (94, 104). Superstitious treatments may proliferate when people observe and copy others using them (105) . Determining what cures disease is difficult, when patients can recover spontaneously. This is particularly relevant with COVID-19, as many people are able to recover at home without specialist treatment (106). Ineffective remedies may be popular because their very ineffectiveness means patients are ill for longer, prolonging usage, which is then copied more frequently (105) . However, the same processes that produce misinformation can motivate compliance with effective measures. As people are more likely to trust information and conform to behaviours they observe in their in-group, appeals by peers are more successful. Shelby and Ernst (96) recommend parents whose un-vaccinated children contracted preventable diseases and parents who immunized their children without adverse effects should share their stories. If people are told that many peers vaccinate, they are more likely to follow suit (107) . Engaging social media users to combat misinformation from others in their network has proven effective in previous outbreaks. For example, a conspiracy theory circulated stating the Zika virus was being transmitted using genetically modified mosquitoes. This was successfully countered on social media by providing links to corrective information and encouraging other users to refute misinformation (108) . Similar methods are now being implemented globally, with the track-and-trace system and mask wearing being promoted in the UK through government paid advertisements by ex-Love Island contestants and other influencers (109) . Ethnographic studies can help shed light on local views and responses to an outbreak. Standard bio-medical messages, such as "science and medicine are our only hope", do not lead to behaviour change (110) , in part because communities often have different beliefs on the effectiveness of treatment methods for different conditions. For example, while Congo hunter-gatherers trust in the effectiveness of Western medicine for certain diseases, for others they rely on traditional practices (111) . Anthropological studies on the local perceptions of the Ebola outbreak found that while certain cultural practices contributed to the spread of the disease, others can be used to slow down epidemics especially considering that most of these communities already lived in high mortality environments (112) . Identifying health-enhancing cultural practices and incorporating them in the design of public health messaging can be helpful. If a practice contributes to group identity, many people will only abandon it if the link between that behaviour and their group identity can be disrupted (113) . For example, campaigns to end female genital mutilation (FGM) can produce a backlash if they imply that local values must be abandoned or supplanted by outside ones (114) . Doing so threatens the target audience's identity. Interventions were more successful if they employ locals to model anti-FGM views and emphasize that conflicting attitudes already exist within populations that practice FGM (114) . These interventions show that people who share the target audience's cultural values can reject FGM, and that doing so is compatible with being a member of that group. Policymakers should be aware that cultural groups, and those within groups, may have different beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment methods and vaccines against COVID-19. It is important to first understand these beliefs and co-design health promotion messages with local groups (115) . Stigmatisation risks entrenching hostile attitudes further (113) . Campaigns are likely to be more successful if they rely on peer interactions with people that members of the target audience share a social identity with, for example by encouraging people who already follow guidelines to become peer educators in their real-life social networks. Peer intervention (e.g. on social media) can be used to refute harmful information that is liable to prevent people from following guidelines, such as the idea that COVID-19 is caused by 5G masts (108) . Conformist social influence can be used to emphasise how others in a social environment or target audience peer group are currently complying with regulations so that others then adopt these behaviours (113) . In the absence of a vaccine, the primary tool at our disposal to prevent the spread of the virus is behavioural change, such as mask wearing and social distancing. Misinformation and conspiracy theories are found to be one of the primary reasons that people are hesitant to adopt these behaviours (116) . Cultural evolutionary theory can help us understand who is most vulnerable in regards to believing untruths about factors relating to COVID-19, and what we can do to minimize the spread of such misinformation. We respond to crises not just as individuals, but also as members of a series of nested communities. Often we have to entrust institutions with devising and enforcing health-related policies on behalf of the whole group. Modern states have multiple levels of organization (national, regional, municipal), and the authority granted to each of them varies greatly depending on the government system (117) . Supranational bodies, such as the European Union or the World Health Organization, play increasingly important roles in guiding policy or coordinating international initiatives on preventative measures (118) . Therefore, a successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic requires not only cooperation between individuals, but also intercommunity coordination, both between nations (international cooperation) and between levels of governance within a nation (intergovernmental cooperation). Evolutionary behavioural sciences are being applied to investigating the evolution of societal organisation and the drivers of intergroup cooperation, employing historical data analysis, experimental studies, and mathematical modelling. Mathematical models have started to explore how our species' ability to form coalitions has made these shifts possible, exploring drivers of cooperation especially in the context of warfare (119, 120) . Throughout human evolution, cooperation between groups has been driven by two main classes of benefits: protection from common threats and resource sharing, especially during times of shortfall ('risk pooling') or if some resources are not available locally (121) . Both these benefits are relevant in the context of the current pandemic, as COVID-19 is a threat to all countries and many communities have faced shortages of medical equipment that have been mitigated, at least in part, through international and intergovernmental cooperation (122) . Despite the potential benefits, collaboration between communities can often fail; just like individuals, groups might experience different costs and benefits that can result in conflicts of interest and, crucially, these may depend on the 'ecology' experienced by different groups and their current status (121) . For example, a recent evolutionary game theoretic model predicts that resource inequalities between players can facilitate intergroup cooperation, because the rich invest more in the public good to protect their wealth and this creates the conditions for the poor to contribute as well (123) . However, a behavioural experiment simulating individuals ability mitigate climate change has demonstrated that, when resource inequalities are coupled with higher risks for poorer groups, conflict can ensue, as richer players are both at less risk and less incentivised to invest (124). But to understand which conditions will result in intergroup cooperation, it is not enough to consider potential conflicts between groups only at one level. The interests of groups at multiple organizational levels -and ultimately of the individual citizens within them -must be analysed simultaneously, since conflict within lower levels might influence cooperation between higher levels (120, 121 ). pandemic from states and communities are likely to be found in these conflicts of interest and their 'ecological' drivers. It is possible that South Korea and Taiwan responded more effectively than Italy or the United States because the former implemented unified national plans rapidly, while the latter struggled, having multiple decision-making centres in regions/states (125) . Although greater centralisation is not necessarily the only possible solution. Research in evolutionary anthropology has shown that conflict resolution is one of the primary functions of leaders in both in small-scale and large-scale human societies, whether egalitarian or stratified (126) . A central leadership capable of mediating between regions, together with clarification of national and regional roles, might be the key to a more effective response, especially in federal systems as an initially successful response in Germany suggests (127). A recent mathematical model of the evolution of military alliances (120) suggests that it might be necessary for conflicts between lower levels (e.g. cities, regions) to be resolved or kept in check for cooperation between higher levels (e.g. states) to be sustained. Given how easily the virus is spread, countries working together to share vaccine developments, including subsidising those countries that cannot afford it, is likely to be essential to eradicating this disease globally. Evolutionary insights help explain the underlying drivers of behaviour, which can help explain why some people take more risks and may not comply with government rules, and why conflicts of interest between generations, between partners or between groups can all impede pandemic mitigation strategies. While attention to conflicts of interest is not exclusive to evolutionary theory, the insights from evolutionary approaches to behaviour can inspire novel solutions, complimenting work in political science, economics and public health on national-and international-level responses to the current pandemic (128) as evidenced in previous responses, such as with Ebola (129) . An evolutionary framework gives guidance as to what is likely to be sustainable in terms of policy to mitigate the costs of this disease. Three main guiding conclusions are: i) 'Good of the group' arguments will not go far. Whilst individuals are willing to pay costs for the good of society, anything that involves long term costs to the individual may not be sustainable unless balanced by other motivations to cooperate. Individual and family-based incentives need to be prioritised. Reputational costs are effective at the local level, but are highly context specific and may vary between communities. Top down diktats will be judged on their success at improving the lives of individuals. Anything that is generating conflict in society, from elections to wars, is likely to make large-scale cooperation at a national or international level more difficult to achieve. ii) Behaviour is heterogenous. 'One size fits all', while improving clarity of message, does not acknowledge the very different costs and benefits experienced by different individuals in society, which will lead to non-compliance. Social distancing policies may need to make exceptions for different kinds of interactions (such as forming 'social bubbles' with elderly relatives, or romantic partners living alone). A behavioural ecology perspective highlights that sustained behaviour change is much more likely to emerge from environmental changes, rather than by just telling people how to behave. The widespread adoption of long-term changes in behaviour that would help keep pandemics at bay may require profound ecological and structural changes that improve life experiences, particularly for disadvantaged groups. Policies may need to look at modifying the costs and benefits of certain lifestyles or behaviours in favour of more security and prosperity. This involves not just modifying the risks of dangerous jobs in cleaning, nursing or public transportation, but also improving neighbourhoods, general public health and general education and reducing other impediments to security such as racism. Improving the prospects of an individual by changing their socioeconomic and physical environment is clearly much more challenging and costly for governments than just issuing advice about behaviour. But behavioural ecology, and other evolutionary frameworks, suggest there are few short cuts to successful mitigation strategies. Adaptive: A fixed or flexible behavioural response that is optimal; it maximises the inclusive fitness of an individual in a particular ecology Behavioural ecology: the study of the evolutionary basis of behaviour as an adaptation to local ecological conditions. Cultural transmission: Transmission of cultural traits (i.e. beliefs, skills, ideas, etc.) between individuals or within or between groups. The quantity that is being maximised by individuals or by a process. Norms: Shared rules and expectations that govern the behaviour of people within specific social and cultural groups. Reciprocity: Performance of a cooperative act in which one agent provides a benefit to another on the premise that the other shall return the favour in due course. Any short-term cost associated with such an act is counterbalanced by the benefit obtained over repeated interactions. Indirect reciprocity: Performance of a cooperative act where reciprocation does not come necessarily from the receiver but from the wider community as a reward for status or reputation as a co-operator. A measure of the number of viable offspring who in turn go on to have viable offspring. Evolutionary life history theory predicts the optimal timing of key life events (e.g. growth, reproduction, death). Initially developed to understand the phenotypic variation in animal behaviour and morphology, life history theory is based on the idea that resources, such as time and energy, are finite (133) . Individuals face 'trade-offs' regarding how to optimally allocate resources, with phenotypes that allocate resources to maximise Darwinian fitness being selected for (134, 135) . Optimal resource allocation is contingent upon the risk of extrinsic mortality (risk of death from an external force, such as a disease) (135) and degree of ecological uncertainty/harshness (136) . More energy is allocated to reproduction when the threat of mortality is greater, whereas when the risk of mortality is lower, energy can be invested into somatic activities and more parental investment. One classic trade-off studied from within a life history framework is the timing of first reproduction, the point at which an individual forgoes investment in growth in favour of increasing direct fitness (137) . Harsher environments tend to associate with an earlier age of first birth (138), greater number of offspring (139) , an increased rate of senescence (140) , risky behaviour (141) and less future orientated thinking (136) . Thus, ecological uncertainty is associated with behaviours that are more rewarding in the short-term. Behavioural variation emerges with age (142), sex (143) , and other population characteristics (144) . From an evolutionary perspective, post-reproductive individuals can only increase their inclusive fitness by investing in their kin, and indeed menopause may have evolved precisely to enable this (145) . This is why intergenerational support within families tends to flow down generations (146) , even if governments are more inclined to spend money gathered from taxing the younger generations on the older generation (147). As the presence of a virus imposes a new risk of extrinsic mortality, life history theory lends itself as an appropriate framework to understand variation in behavioural responses to the risk of catching COVID-19 and to compliance with emergency regulations. It should be noted that the application of life history theory to humans has drawn recent criticism due to the way in which the theory was abstracted from animal biology into human behavioural ecology and evolutionary psychology (148, 149) . For example, life history theory was developed originally for comparison across taxa rather than between individuals of the same species effects attenuate (158). How to encourage individuals to pay personal costs for the public good is a key issue in a pandemic (159) . Local community support for governmental enforcement of rules is important given that reputational costs and benefits are likely to be key. Cultural evolution is a field of research that suggests that cultural traits (e.g. ideas, skills, artefacts, etc.), like biological ones, are transmitted from person to person, exhibit variation, and are subject to selection (160) . These traits can be studied quantitatively using an evolutionary framework. Human culture is cumulative: our knowledge and skills accumulate over generations and increase in diversity and complexity (161) . Biases in whom we learn from have evolved because individuals who have those biases were better able to survive and reproduce (8), especially when the costs and benefits of behaviour are hard for an individual to estimate. For example, prestige bias (copying/learning from highly respected and admired individuals in a group) can be adaptive if prestige is associated with high skill and knowledge (162) . Conformist bias (copying what the majority does or believes in), can be adaptive unless environments change too rapidly or individual learning is error free (8, 163) . By facilitating the spread of specific norms and behaviours, evolved learning mechanisms also contribute to the formation of cultural groups with shared beliefs, social norms and symbolic markers (164, 165) , which can be linked to in-group favouritism and cooperation beyond the family (166) . Humans are exceptional collective thinkers. By the age of three, human children already recognise mutually binding commitments to joint goals (167) , and have sophisticated understanding of the context-specificity of normative rules in their pretend games (82) . In small-scaled hunter-gatherer societies, social conventions exist that help enforce an egalitarian social structure (168, 169) . In large-scale societies, cooperative rules are often realised and enforced through institutions (governments, police, religions), which -in the past 13,000 years -have increased in scope and complexity (170, 171) . 43x29mm (300 x 300 DPI) Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology On aims and methods of ecology Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in the linked electronic health records of 17 million adult NHS patients Large-scale cooperation driven by reputation, not fear of divine punishment Culture and the Evolutionary Process Smith D; Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review Dynamics of behavior change in the COVID world Does extrinsic mortality accelerate the pace of life? A bare-bones approach. Evolution and Human Behavior Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies Nettle D; Flexibility in reproductive timing in human females: integrating ultimate and proximate explanations Oster E; HIV and sexual behavior change: why not Africa? The effect of spending cuts on teen pregnancy Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission Implications of life-history strategies for obesity The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Risk and Delayed Rewards: A Life History Theory Approach Fancourt D; Are we all in this together? Longitudinal assessment of Indonesia's New Coronavirus Concern: A Post-Pandemic Baby Boom The COVID-19 pandemic and human fertility Hunter-gatherer multilevel sociality accelerates cumulative cultural evolution How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition Educational Attainment and Adult Mortality International Handbook of Adult Mortality. International Handbooks of Population SARS pandemic exposure impaired early childhood development: A lessfon for COVID-19 Hrdy SB; Evolutionary context of human development: The cooperative breeding model Parenting in a time of COVID-19 Rise in the incidence of abusive head trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic Student attendance and educational outcomes: Every day counts. Canberra: Report for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Pre-kindergarten attendance matters: Early chronic absence patterns and relationships to learning outcomes The many faces of social isolation in childhood An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives Men's violence against women from an evolutionary perspective Proximate and ultimate explanations are required for a comprehensive understanding of partner rape. Aggression and Violent Behaviour Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population Infidelity, jealousy, and wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: Testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict Understanding domestic violence against women: using evolutionary psychology to extend the feminist functional analysis Intimate partner violence and Hurricane Katrina: predictors and associated mental health outcomes Adult sex ratio and social status predict mating and parenting strategies in Northern Ireland Trapped at home: Coronavirus could be disastrous for domestic violence victims Enarson E; Violence against women in disasters: A study of domestic violence programs in the United States and Canada Universal Credit and Financial Abuse: Exploring the links. Summary and Recommendations. Women's Budget Group Norenzayan A; Most people are not WEIRD Etzioni A; A Communitarian Perspective on Privacy The Fall of Public Man South Korea's success in controlling disease is due to its acceptance of surveillance Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS? The Lancet Infectious Diseases Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture Higher frequency of social learning in China than in the West shows cultural variation in the dynamics of cultural evolution Pathogen prevalence predicts human crosscultural variability in individualism/collectivism Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations The causes of corruption: a cross-national study Normativity and context in young children's pretend play The evolution of superstition through optimal use of incomplete information Cultural Evolution in the Digital Age Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic Use of rapid online surveys to assess People's perceptions during infectious disease outbreaks: a cross-sectional survey on COVID-19 Life under lockdown: coronavirus in the UK Whom Do You Trust? Doubt and Conspiracy Theories in the 2009 Influenza Pandemic The black death and the burning of jews The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories Kata A; Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement The online competition between pro-and antivaccination views Story and science: how providers and parents can utilize storytelling to combat anti-vaccine misinformation Modelling anti-vaccine sentiment as a cultural pathogen Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity Prestige-biased social learning: current evidence and outstanding questions Cognitive Obstacles to Pro-Vaccination Beliefs The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy Kata A; A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet From Traditional Medicine to Witchcraft: Why Medical Treatments Are Not Always Efficacious The roles of altruism, free riding, and bandwagoning in vaccination See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media Through using evolutionary theory to understand why abusers behave the way they do, and under what circumstances this would be expected, it may allow policy makers to target certain individuals and anticipate when during the pandemic violence may increase Ebola: limitations of correcting misinformation Global WEIRDing: transitions in wild plant knowledge and treatment preferences in Congo hunter-gatherers Cultural contexts of Ebola in northern Uganda The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions Changing cultural attitudes towards female genital cutting culture and politics: the anthropology of emerging disease: Cengage Learning Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample The Political Science of Federalism The Rise of International Regime Complexity Evolution of complex hierarchical societies Evolutionary theory of human warfare: genes, individuals, groups. School of Biology Inter-group cooperation in humans and other animals Critical Supply Shortages -The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic Combined inequality in wealth and risk leads to disaster in the climate change game Thinking Globally, Acting Locally -The U.S. Response to Covid The evolutionary anthropology of political leadership COVID-19 as a Complex Intergovernmental Problem Analyzing Variability in Ebola-Related Controls Applied to Returned Travelers in the United States Covid-19: UK government's defence of senior aide has damaged public and NHS confidence, says experts Gravlee CC; Systemic racism, chronic health inequities, and COVID-19: A syndemic in the making? Racism, not genetics, explains why Black Americans are dying of COVID-19 A General Theory of Clutch Size The evolution of life histories Evolution of life history variation among female mammals Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women Evolution and genetics for psychology Death, hope and sex: Steps to an evolutionary ecology of mind and morality Uggla C, Mace R; Effects of local extrinsic mortality rate, crime and sex ratio on preventable death in Northern Ireland The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behaviours: Implications for science, policy, and practice Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span Reproducing in cities Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories Lee R; The formal demography of population aging, transfers, and the economic life cycle On the use of "life history theory" in evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Human Behavior Sear R; Do human 'life history strategies' exist? OSF 2020 Using sequence analysis to test if human life histories are coherent strategies The genetical evolution of social behaviour Evolutionary explanations for cooperation Intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in human warfare Intergenerational and sibling conflict under patrilocality. A model of reproductive skew applied to human kinship Female reproductive competition within families in rural Gambia Milinski M; Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions Powers ST, Lehmann L; When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours Evolutionary perspectives on human behavior during the Coronavirus pandemic: insights from game theory Cultural Evolution: A Review of Theory, Findings and Controversies Cultural evolution by capital accumulation The evolution of prestige -Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of betweengroup differences Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution Transmission and development of costly punishment in children The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition The natural selection of altruistic traits Knauft BM; Violence and Sociality in Human-Evolution How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions Despite this, the logic of tradeoffs and optimality modelling of life history is still useful for understanding human behaviour and decision making under the conditions of a global pandemic. Box 2. Cooperation A behaviour performed by an individual (the 'actor') is cooperative if it results in a fitness benefit for other individuals (the 'recipients'). Natural selection favours cooperation if the actor obtains a fitness benefit either for genetically related individuals (indirect fitness benefits, where benefits are weighted by degree of relatedness) or for themselves (direct fitness benefits) (151, 152) Direct benefits explanations for cooperation rely on reciprocity, reputation or enforcement Behavioural economics research suggests that reputation effects can help solve social dilemmas (156) and, in some small scale-societies, a higher reputation is associated with additional benefits that can translate into fitness, such as greater social support (157). Finally, cooperation can be maintained by enforcement mechanisms -including punishment, rewards, sanctioning and policing (152)