key: cord-0693019-2f44bstk
authors: Scagnolari, Carolina; Trombetti, Simona; Alberelli, Alessia; Cicetti, Simona; Bellarosa, Daniela; Longo, Roberta; Spanò, Alberto; Riva, Elisabetta; Clementi, Massimo; Antonelli, Guido
title: The Synergistic Interaction of Interferon Types I and II Leads to Marked Reduction in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus Replication and Increase in the Expression of mRNAs for Interferon-Induced Proteins
date: 2006-12-22
journal: Intervirology
DOI: 10.1159/000098242
sha: 31194a0404aac899340fd592a5da116df18534b1
doc_id: 693019
cord_uid: 2f44bstk

Interferon (IFN)-α, -β and -γ have been shown to be only marginally effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) replication in Vero cell lines. We investigated the combination of type I IFNs (IFN-α or -β) and IFN-γ for antiviral activity and found that such combinations synergistically inhibited SARS-CoV replication in Vero cells, using yield reduction assay and the isobologram and combination index methods of Chou and Talalay for evaluation. The highly synergistic anti-SARS-CoV action of type I IFNs and IFN-γ parallels the marked increase in 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase and p56 mRNAs following exposure in Vero cells to either IFN-α or -β and IFN-γ compared with the transcriptional levels obtained after stimulation with either IFN alone. These results demonstrate that SARS-CoV, although only moderately sensitive to the antiviral action of the individual types of IFN, is highly sensitive to a combination of type I and II IFNs, which suggests that such combinations may have potential in the treatment of SARS-CoV infections.

mates experimentally infected with SARS, but the actual therapeutic efficacy of post-exposure treatment with pegylated IFN-␣ has yet to be established [9] . With regard to the antiviral activity of IFNs, we have previously reported that simultaneous treatment with IFN-␤ , at various concentrations, and 100 IU/ml of IFN-␥ acted synergistically against SARS-CoV replication in Vero cells [10] . Similar synergistic antiviral activity of IFN-␤ and IFN-␥ against SARS-CoV has also been demonstrated by others [11] under different experimental conditions, namely using higher doses of IFN-␥ in combination with IFN-␤ . However, recently, Paragas et al. [12] have reported that a combination of IFN-␣ consensus 1 and IFN-␥ did not exhibit any synergistic antiviral activity against SARS-CoV.

Because of the importance of this issue and in support of the search for effective anti-SARS-CoV treatment, our previous study was extended to evaluate the in vitro antiviral activity of IFN-␣ or -␤ both alone and in combination with IFN-␥ against SARS-CoV infection. Our specific goal was to determine whether combinations of both IFNs would produce enhanced antiviral effects that could, indirectly, suggest potential combination IFN therapy strategies for the treatment of SARS-CoV. The effect of combinations of both IFNs against SARS-CoV were analysed by yield reduction assay. Specifically, African green monkey kidney epithelial cells (Vero cells) were seeded into 96-well plates (2 ! 10 4 cells per well) and cultured overnight. Triplicate cell cultures were treated with concentrations (1-100,000 IU/ml) of recombinant IFN-␤ (rIFN-␤ 1a , specific activity 270 MIU/mg; Rebif , Ares-Serono, Basel, Switzerland) or natural IFN-␣ (nIFN-␣ , leukocyte IFN, specific activity 200 MIU/mg; Alfaferone , Alfa-Wasserman, Bologna, Italy), either alone or in combination with rIFN-␥ (specific activity 20 MIU/mg; Imukin , Boehringer Ingelheim, Reggello-Firenze, Italy) 24 h before infection with SARS-CoV [multiplicity of infection = 0.1 TCID 50 /cell (50% tissue culture infectious dose)]. Infection with SARS-CoV (HSR1 strain) [13] was allowed to develop for 72 h, depending on the time required for specific cytopathic effects to become clearly visible by optical microscopy [10, 13] . Culture supernatants were then collected and titration of SARS-CoV was performed in Vero cells by determination of the TCID 50 using the method of Reed and Muench [14] .

As expected ( table 1 ) , exogenously added IFN-␣ , -␤ and -␥ exhibited only a minor inhibitory effect on the yield of infectious SARS-CoV in Vero cells when used alone. Values of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) ranged from 400 IU/m (IFN-␤ ) to 3,700 IU/ml (IFN-␣ ). However, when different concentrations of IFN-␣ or -␤ were used in combination with different concentrations of IFN-␥ , inhibition of the virus yield was more pronounced. Indeed, the IC 50 values decreased markedly when the different IFNs were used in combination. Specifically, the IC 50 values for SARS-CoV yield for IFN-␣ in combination with IFN-␥ were up to 1.2 and 3.6 log fold lower compared with the IC 50 value for treatment with IFN-␣ alone. The IC 50 values for IFN-␥ showed a 1.0-2.5 log fold decrease when used in combination with IFN-␣ relative to the value recorded for IFN-␥ alone. Interestingly, the synergistic antiviral effect of the combination of IFN-␣ or -␤ with IFN-␥ was also observed with low concentrations of IFN-␥ ( ! 10 IU/ml).

As expected, these results ( table 1 ) also confirmed our previous findings on the synergistic effects of IFN-␤ and IFN-␥ [10] . Here, the extended experiments and statistical analysis clearly show that the concentrations of IFN-␤ or IFN-␥ required to inhibit 50% of viral yield production were significantly decreased when used in combination compared with single IFN-␤ or IFN-␥ treatments (p ! 0.05).

A detailed analysis of the nature of antiviral interaction between type I and II IFNs on the replication of SARS-CoV was undertaken using the isobologram and combination index (CI) method of Chou and Talalay [15] . The general equation for the classic isobologram is given as follows: Isobolograms were constructed for viral yield reduction values ranging from 5 to 95%. Experimental combination therapy data points plotted well below the expected additive line at each viral yield reduction value for type I IFN (IFN-␣ or -␤ ) plus IFN-␥ combinations, indicating a strong synergism across a broad range of doses (data not shown). The CI values for the interaction between type I IFNs (IFN-␣ or -␤ ) and IFN-␥ were ! 1 over the entire range of viral yield reduction values tested (2-99%), indicating a strong synergism ( fig. 1 ) .

The mechanism by which type I and II IFNs synergise to inhibit SARS-CoV is as yet unclear. Previous studies have suggested that MxA, a type-I-induced protein, is not the critical factor that mediates inhibition of SARS-CoV, despite its high-level induction by IFN-␤ as well as by a mixture of IFN-␤ and IFN-␥ [10, 16] . Hence, in order to discover a possible mechanism responsible for the observed synergism between type I and II IFNs, we examined the expression of two other well-known IFN-inducible proteins: 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase [17] and p56 (also known as IFIT1) [18] . The mRNA copy content of their genes was measured in untreated versus IFN-treated Vero cells by a real-time 5 -exonuclease reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan ) assay using the ABI 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosys- tems, Monza, Italy). Briefly, total cellular RNA was extracted from 5 ! 10 6 Vero cells using phenol and guanidine isothiocyanate reagent (Trizol , Gibco BRL, Grand Island, N.Y., USA), following the manufacturer's instructions, and was transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems). Next, the following primer pair and probes were added to the Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) at 300 and 100 n M , respectively, in a final volume of 50 l: 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase [19] forward 5 -TCAG-CGAGGCCAGTAATCTTG-3 ; reverse 5 -TCAGCCA-TTGCCAGCATATTT-3 ; probe 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)-5 -TCCAGTTGACCCAACCAATAATGT-GAGTGG-3 -6-carboxy-tetramethyl rhodamine (TAM-RA); p56 forward 5 -TGAAGAAGCTCTAGCCAACAT-GTC-3 ; reverse 5 -GAGCTTTATCCACAGAGCCTTT-TC-3 ; probe 6 -FAM-5 -TATGTCTTTCGATATGCA-GCCAAGTTTTACCG-3 -TAMRA). Co-amplification of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase mRNA housekeeping gene (TaqMan endogenous controls, No.

4333768F, Applied Biosystems) was used to normalise the amount of total RNA present. Considering that the different IFN preparations have different specific activities (IU/mg protein), Vero cells were exposed to 5 ng/ml of either IFN-␣ (1,000 IU/ml), IFN-␤ (1,350 IU/ml), IFN-␥ (100 IU/ml) or both type I IFNs (IFN-␣ /IFN-␤ ) and IFN-␥ (5 ng/ml each) for 18-20 h.

The results show that all IFNs tested induced detectable amounts of 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase and p56 mRNAs ( fig. 2 ) . Interestingly, the 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase and p56 transcriptional levels increased significantly after stimulation of the Vero cells by both IFN-␣ or -␤ and IFN-␥ , compared with the transcriptional levels obtained after stimulation with either IFN alone.

It is tempting to speculate that the increased expression of 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase and p56, when a combination of both types of IFN is used, could be due to a synergistic interaction between type I and II IFNs through the induction of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 and type I receptors [20, 21] . Such a possibility should be addressed by performing further and more focused studies; at present, no definite conclusions can be drawn on the mechanism underlying the strong synergism recorded here.

In summary, our data extending and accomplishing previous results demonstrate that the combination of IFN-␣ or -␤ with IFN-␥ produced significantly enhanced antiviral activity against SARS-CoV infection compared with any individual IFN, and this synergism parallels the increase in expression of 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase and p56 mRNAs. It should be emphasised that our in vitro study has thus far been performed only in Vero cells. We were unable to obtain viral progeny from other human cell lines, including Caco and Huh7, employed by others [5, 22, 23] ; thus, we were unable to assess the activity of the various IFNs in a proper human system. Further, no firm conclusions or extrapolations can be drawn from the IFN inhibitory concentration values obtained with regard to potential therapeutic concentrations of IFNs that might be expected to be required in a clinical situation. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that further investigation may be warranted to determine the role of IFN-␣ or -␤ plus IFN-␥ as a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of SARS-CoV infections.

This work was supported in part by a grant to G.A. from University La Sapienza (Fondi Ateneo quota 60%). Data, normalised to hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase mRNA, were calculated by using the arithmetic formula 2 -⌬ ⌬ Ct according to the supplier's guidelines. * p ! 0.05 compared with fold change of 2 -5 -oligoadenylate synthetase and p56 after exposure of Vero cells to IFN-␣ , IFN-␤ or IFN-␥ separately using Student's t test.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome: scientific and anecdotal evidence for drug treatment

Development of antiviral therapy for severe acute respiratory syndrome

Role of interferons in the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome

Treatment of SARS with human interferons

In vitro inhibition of SARS virus replication by human interferons

Interferon-␤ 1a and SARS coronavirus replication

Potent inhibition of SARS-associated coronavirus (SCoV) infection and replication by type I interferons (IFN-␣ / ␤ ) but not by type II interferon (IFN-␥ )

Pegylated interferon-␣ protects type 1 pneumocytes against SARS coronavirus infection in macaques

Increased sensitivity of SARS-coronavirus to a combination of human type I and type II interferons

Interferon-␤ and interferon-␥ synergistically inhibit the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV)

Interferon-␣ con1 is an inhibitor of SARS-corona virus in cell-based models

Coronaviridae and SARS-associated coronavirus strain HSR1

A simple method of estimating fifty percent end-points

Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors

The antiviral effect of interferon-␤ against SARS-coronavirus is not mediated by MxA protein

The human 2 ,5 -oligoadenylate synthetase family: interferon-induced proteins with unique enzymatic properties

Novel functions of proteins encoded by viral stress-inducible genes

Interferon-stimulated gene expression in black and white hepatitis C patients during peginterferon ␣ -2a combination therapy

Synergistic interaction between interferon-␣ and interferon-␥ through induced synthesis of one subunit of the transcription factor ISGF3

Upregulation of type I interferon receptor by IFN-␥ . J Interferon

Comparative host gene transcription by microarray analysis early after infection of the Huh7 cell line by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus 229E

Ribavirin and interferon-␤ synergistically inhibit SARS-associated coronavirus replication in animal and human cell lines

Intervirology 2007;50:156-160